Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Capital Region
Division of Pasay City
Pasay City North High School Main Campus
Virginia St., M. Dela Cruz, Pasay City
Tel. #: 804-99-85

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: OLIVA C. PARANGA Name of Rater: MRS. PAMFILA P. ABINAL

Position: Teacher II Position: DEPARTMENT HEAD III
Review Period: 1ST SEM, S.Y. 2017 2018 Date of Review:
Division: Pasay
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING
EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs TIMELI WEIGH PERFORMANCE
OBJECTIVES ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
NE T INDICATORS
per (Quality, Efficiency,
Q E T AVE.
KRA Timeliness)
*Daily lesson I. TEACHING Prepares daily lesson plans June 10% QUALITY
plan LEARNING and daily logs of activities 2017 5 - 100 % DLP/DLL and
PROCESS including appropriate, October instructional materials
*List of adequate and updated 2018 prepared
instructional (40%) instructional materials within 4 90 99% DLP/DLL and
materials used the rating period instructional materials
per rating prepared
period 3 - 80 89% DLP/DLL and
instructional materials
*Lesson Guides prepared
2 70 79% DLP/DLL and
instructional materials
prepared
1 70% and below
DLP/DLL and instructional
materials prepared

TIMELINESS
5 - DLP/DLL and
instructional materials

Classroom Initiates discipline of
rules and guide students including classroom
lines rules, guidelines and
individual and group tasks
within the rating period
Progress Monitors attendance,
Report on diversity appreciation, safe,
Remediation positive and motivating
/Enrichment environment, overall physical
Program atmosphere, cleanliness and
orderliness of classrooms
including proper waste
disposal were monitored
daily
prepared as scheduled
4 - DLP/DLL and
instructional materials
prepared 1 day delayed
3 - DLP/DLL and
instructional materials
prepared 2 days delayed
2 - DLP/DLL and
instructional materials
prepared 3 days delayed
1 - DLP/DLL and
instructional materials
prepared more than 3 days
delayed
June 15% QUALITY
2017 5 - 100% of the learners
October have shown improvement in
2018 discipline
4 - 90 99% of the learners
have shown improvement in
discipline
3 - 80 89% of the learners
have shown improvement in
discipline
2 - 70 89% of the learners
have shown improvement in
discipline
1 - Below 70% of the
learners have shown
improvement in discipline
June 15% QUALITY
2017 5 - 100% of attendance
October diversity appreciations, safe,
2018 positive and motivating
environment, overall physical
atmosphere, were monitored
4 90 99% of attendance
diversity appreciations, safe,
positive and motivating
environment, overall physical
 atmosphere, were monitored
3 80 89% of attendance
diversity appreciations, safe,
positive and motivating
environment, overall physical
atmosphere, were monitored
2 70 79% of attendance
diversity appreciations, safe,
positive and motivating
environment, overall physical
atmosphere, were monitored
1 70% and below of
attendance diversity
appreciations, safe, positive
and motivating environment,
overall physical atmosphere,
were monitored

TIMELINESS
5 Required accomplished
monitoring report submitted
on time/as scheduled
4 - Required accomplished
monitoring report submitted
1 day delayed
3 - Required accomplished
monitoring report submitted
2 days delayed
2 - Required accomplished
monitoring report submitted
3 days delayed
1 - Required accomplished
monitoring report submitted
more than 3 days delayed
Test II. STUDENT Monitors and evaluates and June 20% QUALITY
noteboo OUTCOME maintain students progress 2017 5 100% of the evidences
k with (40%) October and varied assessments
TQS 2018 were evaluated and
Unit/Cha monitored through the
pter Test students outcome
Periodic 4 90 99% of the
test evidences and varied
Grading assessments were evaluated
 sheets and monitored through the
Pupils/st students outcome
udents 3 80 89% of the
Portfolio evidences and varied
Pre assessments were evaluated
Test and and monitored through the
Post students outcome
Test 2 70 79% of the
Results evidences and varied
Initiated assessments were evaluated
Intervent and monitored through the
ion students outcome
program 1 70% and below of the
E evidences and varied
Class assessments were evaluated
Record and monitored through the
students outcome

TIMELINESS
5 - Accomplished the
evidences and varied
assessments as scheduled
and submitted on time/as
scheduled
4 - Accomplished the
evidences and varied
assessments 1 day delayed
3 - Accomplished the
evidences and varied
assessments 2 day delayed
2 - Accomplished the
evidences and varied
assessments 3 days delayed
1 - Accomplished the
evidences and varied
assessments more than 3
days delayed

Progres Conducts June 10% QUALITY

s Report Remediation/enrichment 2017 5 - Conducted
on Programs to improve October Remediation/enrichment
Remedi Performance indicators 2018 program to 100% of the
ation/ identified learners
Enrichm
ent 4 - Conducted
Program Remediation/enrichment
program to 90 99% of the
identified learners

3 - Conducted
Remediation/enrichment
program to 80 89% of the
identified learners

2 - Conducted
Remediation/enrichment
program to 70 79% of the
identified learners

1 - Conducted
Remediation/enrichment
program to 69% and below
of the identified learners

TIMELINESS
5 Remediation/ Enrichment
Program was conducted on
time or as scheduled

4 - Remediation/ Enrichment
Program was conducted 1
day delayed

3 - Remediation/ Enrichment
Program was conducted 2
days delayed

2 - Remediation/ Enrichment
Program was conducted 3
days delayed

1 - Remediation/ Enrichment
Program was conducted
 more than 3 days delayed
Test results for Attains the required MPS for June 10% QUALITY
learning area grade level and learning 2017 5 81% and above MPS
areas October 4 70 79% MPS
Grading sheets 2018 3 60 69 MPS
and Report 2 50 59% MPS
Cards 1 49% and below MPS

HRPTA III. COMMUNITY Conducts regular PTA June 8% QUALITY

Matrix of INVOLVEMENT meetings/ conferences 2017 5 - Conducted
Activities (10%) October Two PTA meetings
Organized 2018 and
HRPTA Four conferences
Meetings/Co with 90 100%
nferences attendance
Minutes of 4 - Conducted
Meetings Two PTA meetings
Attendance and
Accomplish Four conferences
report with 80 89%
attendance
3 - Conducted
Two PTA meetings
and
Four conferences
with 70 79%
attendance
2 - Conducted
Two PTA meetings
and
Four conferences
with 60 69%
attendance
1 - Conducted
Two PTA meetings
and
Four conferences
with 60 attendance

TIMELINESS
5 Conducted PTA
 meetings as needed and
conferences per grading
period
4 Conducted PTA
meetings as needed and
conferences per grading
period delayed for one week
3 - Conducted PTA
meetings as needed and
conferences per grading
period delayed for two
weeks
2 - Conducted PTA
meetings as needed and
conferences per grading
period delayed for three
weeks
1 - Conducted PTA
meetings as needed and
conferences per grading
period delayed for one more
than three weeks

Academic Visits parents of students June 1% 5 - 90 - 100% of the

Monitoring needing academic 2017 identified parents were
report monitoring/ follow up within October visited
Home Visit the rating period 2018 4 - 80 - 89%
Report of the identified parents
Accomplishm were visited
ent report 3 - 70 - 79%
Intervention of the identified parents
report were visited
Log Book 2 - 60 - 69%
Parent of the identified parents
Teacher were visited
Agreement 1 - Below 60%
of the identified parents
were visited

List of Undertakes/ Initiates June 1% QUALITY

Projects/ projects/ events/ activities 2017 5 - 100% accomplishment of
events/ with external funding/ October initiated projects/ events/
 activities/ sponsorship within the target 2018 activities
initiated or date. 4 - 90 99%
undertaken accomplishment of
initiated projects/ events/
activities
3 - 80 89%
accomplishment of
initiated projects/ events/
activities
2 - 70 79%
accomplishment of initiated
projects/ events/ activities
1 Below 70%
accomplishment of initiated
projects/ events/ activities

Participation IV. Initiates/ Participates in co- June 7% QUALITY

on co PROFESSIONAL curricular school activities 2017 5 - Initiated and participated
curricular GROWTH AND within the rating period October at least 2 co curricular
school DEVELOPMENT 2018 school activities with
activities (10%) documented results
with 4 - Initiated and participated
documented at least 1 co curricular
results school activities with
documented results
3 - Participated in most co
curricular school
activities with
documented results
2 - Participation only without
documented results
1 - No participation in
school activities

Published Produces publication/ June 1% QUALITY

Work creative work for scholl 2017 5 - Produced publication/
paper/ Pasay educourier/ October Creative work in DepEd
DepEd post or any national 2018 post or any national
circulation within the target circulation
date 4 - Produced publication/
creative work in NCR
Gazette
 3 - Produced publication/
creative work in
Edu courier
2 - Produced publication/
Creative work in school
1 - No work has been
Published

Certificate/ Receives Special Award/ June 2% QUALITY

Trophy/ Citation/ Recognition for 2017 5 - Received Special award
Plaque exemplary performance October recognition for exemplary
2018 performance in the
national level and or
award giving body
authorized/ sanctioned by
DepEd Central Office
4 - Received Special award
recognition for exemplary
performance in the
NCR level and or
award giving body
authorized/ sanctioned by
DepEd Central Office
3 - Received Special award
recognition for exemplary
performance in the
division level and or
award giving body
authorized/ sanctioned by
DepEd Central Office
2 - Received Special award
recognition for exemplary
performance in the
district level and or
award giving body
authorized/ sanctioned by
DepEd Central Office
1 - Received Special award
recognition for exemplary
performance in the
 national level and or
award giving body
authorized/ sanctioned by
DepEd Central Office

OVERALL RATING
FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

_________________________ ___________________________ _________________________________

Rater Ratee Approving Authority
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives

Rater Ratee Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee: Oliva C. Paranga Name of Superior: Pamfila P. Abinal

Signature: Signature:
Date: Date:

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs ( Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention )

___________________________ _____________________________ _________________________________

Rater Ratee Approving Authority