Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oral Hairy Leukplakia
Oral Hairy Leukplakia
Oral Hairy Leukplakia
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2010.01649.x
John Wiley & Sons. Printed in Singapore Journal of
Cutaneous Pathology
A) B)
D)
C)
Fig. 2. A) Low-power views showing parakeratosis, mild basal cell hyperplasia and ballooning keratinocytes. B) There were co-existing
features of morsicatio mucosae oris with prominent bacterial colonization of the epithelial surface. C) Examination on high-power showed the
characteristic eosinophilic intranuclear inclusions and beaded nuclear chromatin. D) EpsteinBarr virus RNA within keratinocyte nuclei as
shown by chromogenic in situ hybridization.
276
Iatrogenic oral hairy leukoplakia
A) B)
Fig. 3. A) Low-power magnification showing hyperkeratosis, ballooning keratinocytes and superficial papillary dermal inflammation without
superimposed features of morsicatio mucosae oris. B) High-power magnification demonstrating perinuclear clearing, eosinophilic intranuclear
inclusions and nuclear beading of chromatin.
arthritis who presented with a several week history or via a direct entry of cell virions through basolateral
of a non-removable white plaque on the tongue membranes with adjacent epithelial cell spread after
and floor of her mouth measuring approximately initial infection.9 OHL could be because of contin-
2.5 cm 2.0 cm. The patient had a 40-year-long uous or repeated infection of the more superficial
history of methotrexate and prednisone therapy use epithelium by infected cells or alternatively might
for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. She was a stem from reactivation of latent lytic proteins in basal
non-smoker without any history of recreational drug cells.3,4,10 13 Differences in OHL pathogenesis may
use or risk factors for HIV. Despite being on long- also reflect differences in the immune status of the
term steroid therapy, she had no history of recurrent affected patients.
infections or hospitalizations. An initial biopsy of OHL has also been documented in less
her oral lesion was inconclusive. The patient was profoundly immunocompromised patients in the
initially treated for possible candidiasis with nystatin settings of inhaled steroid therapy for asthma, steroid
and fluconazole without response. The clinical therapy for chronic medical conditions and, in
diagnosis of oral lichen planus was entertained rare instances, immunocompetent patients.2,14 18
and the patient was treated with fluticasone Interestingly, there may be some pathogenetic
propionate irrigation, again, without response. A differences between OHL in HIV patients and OHL
repeat biopsy 4 months later showed parakeratosis in other patient groups. While EBV replication is
with ballooning degeneration of keratinocytes present in normal tongue epithelium in HIV-positive
and intranuclear eosinophilic inclusions, without patients, EBV replication is a rare occurrence in
evidence of dysplasia or carcinoma (Fig. 3). immunocompetent patients.8,13,19,20 Therefore, a
Chromogenic in situ hybridization for EBV (EBER) latent reservoir in mucosal epithelium does not
was performed and was strongly positive, confirming appear to be an underlying mechanism for these
the diagnosis of OHL. GMS and PAS stains were non-HIV patients, but rather OHL is probably the
negative for fungi. result of new/persistent infection with EBV.
Our two cases highlight the fact that OHL
is less frequently considered in the clinical
Discussion differential diagnosis of leukoplakia in less profoundly
OHL was originally described in immunocompro- immunocompromised patients. They underscore the
mised homosexual men infected with HIV. It was importance of a biopsy to establish the diagnosis,
considered an early diagnostic and prognostic fac- especially in the setting where patients do not respond
tor of immunosuppression and early progression to medical therapy. OHL can be recognized by
to AIDS and was found in up to 25% of that its defining histopathological features: acanthosis,
patient population.2 The precise pathogenesis of parakeratosis, ballooning keratinocytes with small
OHL is incompletely understood. It is well known pyknotic nuclei with intranuclear inclusions (Cowdry
that EBV can remain in latent form in circulat- type A) and clear perinuclear halos.3,4 The
ing B lymphocytes.2,5,6 Establishment of OHL in vacuolated keratinocytes often show margination
HIV-positive patients may be the result of active of the nuclear chromatin giving it a nuclear
exchange of multiple EBV strains by B-cell transfer7,8 beading appearance.2,3 The cytoplasm can have a
277
Rushing et al.
ground glass appearance similar to other herpesvi- candidiasis.24 The recognition of the yeast may result
ral infections and there may be a sparse associated in underlying OHL being overlooked.
inflammatory infiltrate.3,4 Demonstration of EBV Morsicatio mucosae oris is perhaps the most diffi-
within the mucosal epithelium is requisite for the cult consideration in the histopathological differential
diagnosis.3,4 Chromogenic in situ hybridization for diagnosis. This entity represents frictional hyper-
EBV (EBER) is the most sensitive technique for keratosis that presents as leukoplakia clinically. It
practical clinical use.4,21 represents a reactive alteration that is the result
The differential diagnosis of OHL includes other of persistent chewing/biting of the mucosa. Most
causes of leukoplakia. As in our cases, lichen planus is commonly, it presents on the buccal mucosa (mor-
often the first clinical diagnosis considered in patients sicatio buccarum) but also may present on the
with OHL. Patients with lichen planus can present tongue (morsicatio linguarum) or lips (morsicatio
with features similar to OHL, with hyperkeratotic labiorum).25 Microscopically, morsicatio mucosae
white plaques involving the lateral tongue and buc- oris bears a striking resemblance to OHL. Both
cal mucosa, and clinical relapses and remissions can have acanthosis with ballooning degeneration of
ensue.22 However, OHL and lichen planus are read- keratinocytes and parakeratosis. Morsicatio charac-
ily separable based on histopathological analysis. teristically has prominent bacterial colonization of
In solitary lesions of OHL, squamous dyspla- the mucosal surface and lacks the EBV intranu-
sia, squamous cell carcinoma or tobacco keratosis clear inclusions of OHL.25 Like candidiasis, the
could be considered. Although the acanthosis and findings of morsicatio can coexist with OHL. This
was observed in our case 1 and can further com-
ballooning degeneration can cause confusion with
plicate interpretation. As the intranuclear inclu-
a neoplastic process, OHL lacks hyperchromasia,
sions seen in OHL may be difficult to see in
pleomorphism, a disordered growth pattern or atyp- individual cases, we recommend in situ hybridiza-
ical mitotic figures, as can be seen with dysplasia tion for EBER in immunocompromised patients
or carcinoma. Smokeless tobacco keratosis typically before rendering the diagnosis of morsicatio mucosae
presents in the mandibular sulcus, as opposed to the oris.
lateral tongue. Microscopically, smokeless tobacco
keratosis also shows superficial pallor as a result of
ballooning keratinocytes, but the affected epithelium Conclusion
typically has pyknotic nuclei without the intranu- OHL represents a benign oral infection that may be
clear inclusions of OHL.23 Furthermore, smokeless misdiagnosed both clinically and histopathologically.
tobacco keratosis will show amyloid-like PAS-positive Our cases emphasize that OHL should be consid-
material deposited around the minor salivary glands. ered in the differential diagnosis of leukoplakia even
Candidiasis can bear a clinical resemblance to in patients who are not profoundly immunocompro-
OHL, but the plaques of candidiasis can usually mised. OHL should be considered in patients not
be scraped off on physical examination. Candidiasis responding to medical treatment for other entities
has less ballooning of the keratinocytes, but compli- such as lichen planus or candidiasis. Poor response
cating the pathological differential diagnosis is the to medical therapy is always an indication for biopsy
fact that patients with OHL may have co-existing in patients with leukoplakia.
References
1. Greenspan D, Greenspan JS, Conant M, 5. Thomas JA, Felix DH, Wray D, et al. 9. Tugizov SM, Berline JW, Palefsky JM.
Petersen V, Silverman S, De Sousa Y. Oral Epstein-Barr virus gene expression and epithe- Epstein-Barr virus infection of polarized
hairy leukoplakia in male homosexuals: evi- lial cell differentiation in oral hairy leuko- tongue and nasopharyngeal epithelial cells.
dence of association with both papillomavirus plakia. Am J Pathol 1991; 139: 1369. Nat Med 2003; 9: 307.
and a herpes-group virus. Lancet 1984; 2: 6. Slots J, Saygun I, Sabeti M, Kubar A. 10. Itin PH. Oral hairy leukoplakia - 10 years on.
831. Epstein-Barr virus in oral diseases. J Periodont Dermatol 1993; 187: 159.
2. Piperi E, Omlie J, Pambuccian S, Koutlas IG. Res 2006; 41: 235. 11. Niedobitek G, Young LS, Lau R, et al.
Oral hairy leukoplakia in HIV-negative 7. Palefsky JM, Berline J, Greenspan D, Epstein-Barr virus infection in oral hairy
patients: report of 10 cases. Int J Surg Pathol Greenspan JS. Evidence for trafficking of leukoplakia: virus replication in the absence of
2008; 20: 1. Epstein-Barr virus strains between hairy a detectable latent phase. J Gen Virol 1991;
3. Triantos D, Porter SR, Scully C, Teo CG. leukoplakia and peripheral blood lympho- 72: 3035.
Oral hairy leukoplakia: clinicopathologic fea- cytes. J Gen Virol 2002; 83: 317. 12. Walling DM, Ling PD, Gordadze AV,
tures, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and clinical 8. Walling DM, Etienne W, Ray AJ, Flaitz CM, Montes-Walters M, Flaitz CM, Nichols CM.
significance. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 25: 1392. Nichols, CM. Persistence and transition of Expression of Epstein-Barr virus latent genes
4. Ikediobi N, Tyring S. Cutaneous manifesta- Epstein-Barr virus genotypes in the patho- in oral epithelium: determinants of the patho-
tions of Epstein-Barr virus infection. Dermatol genesis of oral hairy leukoplakia. J Infect Dis genesis of oral hairy leukoplakia. J Infect Dis
Clin 2002; 20: 283. 2004; 190: 387. 2004; 190: 396.
278
Iatrogenic oral hairy leukoplakia
13. Walling DM, Flaitz CM, Nichols CM, Hud- 17. Eisenberg E, Krutchkoff D, Yamase H. Inci- 21. Gully ML. Molecular diagnosis of Epstein-
nall SD, Adler-Storthz K. Persistent produc- dental oral hairy leukoplakia in immunocom- Barr virus related diseases. J Mol Diagn 2001;
tive Epstein-Barr virus replication in normal petent persons. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 3: 1.
epithelial cells in vivo. J Infect Dis 2001; 184: Pathol 1992; 74: 332. 22. Epstein JB, Wan LS, Gorsky M, Zhang L.
Oral lichen planus: progress in understanding
1499. 18. Felix DH, Watret K, Wray D, Southam JC.
its malignant potential and the implications
14. Fluckiger R, Laifer G, Itin P, Meyer B, Hairy leukoplakia in an HIV-negative nonim- for clinical management. Oral Surg Oral Med
Lang C. Oral hairy leukoplakia in a patient munosupressed patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 2003; 96: 32.
with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1994; Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 563. 23. Pindborg JJ, Reibel J, Roed-Petersen B,
106: 506. 19. Herrmann K, Frangou P, Middeldorp J, Mehta FS. Tobacco-induced changes in oral
15. Zakrzewska JM, Aly Z, Speight PM. Oral Niedobitek G. Epstein-Barr virus replication leukoplakic epithelium. Cancer 1980; 45:
hairy leukoplakia in a HIV-negative asthmatic in tongue epithelial cells. J Gen Virol 2002; 2330.
patient on systemic steroids. J Oral Pathol 83: 2995. 24. Sciubba JJ. Opportunistic oral infections in
the immnosuppressed patient: oral hairy
Med 1995; 24: 282. 20. Frangou P, Buettner M, Niedobitek G.
leukoplakia and oral candidiasis. Adv Dent
16. Lozada-Nur F, Robinson J, Regezi JA. Oral Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in epithe- Res 1996; 10: 69.
hairy leukoplakia in non-immunosuppressed lial cells in vivo: rare detection of EBV repli- 25. Woo SB, Lin D. Morsicatio mucosae oris - a
patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol cation in tongue mucosa but not in salivary chronic oral frictional keratosis, not a leuko-
1994; 78: 599. glands. J Infect Dis 2005; 191: 238. plakia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 140.
279