, vol. XLV (2011), no. 4, .

459476

: 327(5/9)

: 14. 11. 2011.

--:
21. *
.
-
.
,
, -
. -
, .
, -
-
, . -
, , -
: , .
: -
, ; , , -
. -
, , , -
.
: , , , , ,

* , III 47029 -

21. .

. .

459
 , , : 21.

***
20
.
, , , -
, , , -
. -
, , -
. -
, -
, , , -
. ,
.
, ,
. , :
, , ,
, -
, - , -
-
, , .
, ,

.
-
. -

.
, , -
-
, . ,
, , ,
. , -
/ , . ,
, -
, -
: , . -
?
, , -, - -
. ,
. , (

460
 , vol. XLV (2011), no. 4, . 459476

, 1,3 , National Bureau of

Statistics of China, 2011), -
. ,
,
( , ), ,
. -
, (), -
14% , 2% -
. , , -
, , ,
.
, -
.
,
, ,
, , -
, . , ,
.
,
. 19.
, -
, , -
. , . (, -
, 1994: 204)
( -
), ,
. , -
, ( -
), , -

.

1.
-
,
() . -
,
(), , 2010. 14,62, 5,7, 1,477 -
(The World Fact Book, 2011). ,

461
 , , : 21.

, , 2010. -
. ,
, 14,8 14,6 .
, ,
, ,
. , .
, '' -
''.
( ) , -
, -
1,38 ; 13, -
32 .
16. 2011. , 14 -
(97% ), ,
(). ,
-
, .. .
-
. -
, (3,6 ), -
, . -
, 2010. , (769
$) (755 $). -
(, 2011.
).
, , -
.
,
, ,
. , ,

,
' (, , 838 (31): 11).
, ,
2010. , 480 $ (34% ), -
12
. , -
, -
. , 1998. ,

462
 , vol. XLV (2011), no. 4, . 459476

100% 1999. , 146% . , -

, 406 -
$ (The World Factbook-Rank Order-CIA, 2011). , -
-
. , , 12.
2011. ,
, (-
, 2011. ).
, ,
, -
- - -
. , , -
. -
, -
.
, -
, . -
, -
; ; , -
, ;
; -
- -3; . ( : -
, 2011).
, (Stratfor), 10.
2011, : -
. , -
.
, -
,
.
, :

.
-
, . ,
.
( ..
..) (Stratfor, 2011).

463
 , , : 21.

2.
-
. , , -
. ,
.
,
, 12. 2007. -
, -
, 865 , Feng Yun 1C, -
1999. . , 15. 2003. , -
, 12. 2005. -
, ?enc?ou -6 -
.
2006. ,

. -
. , -
,
.
(), 15. 2001.
( : , , 2011),
,
(Asian Curency Unit, ACU), 1. 2006. ,
, , -
.
, , -
2008. , -
,
51 , , -
, - 100 110.
, , , -
.
21. .
(), 15-21. -
2007. , ,
10. .
, -
, . , -
, (

464
 , vol. XLV (2011), no. 4, . 459476

), . -
, , 1.
,
, (Klaus Tpfer),
, , ,
, -
.
(2000-
2010) , . ,
10,3% ,
(2,7%). 2009.
. 2010. ,
-
. -
. 2010. , -
2,85 . Financial Times 2010. -
, ,
, , , . -
, 2,85 2003. , 56,5
2009. . Financial Times-, BBC -
(China Development Bank China Import
Bank), 2009. 2010. -
. ,
110 (, 2011).
, , , -
. ,
, 2570 119 -
.
,
. 2010. , -
2011. , -
-
. 10% .

1 , -

12. 1982. . -
70 . 21. -
, ,
, , .

465
 , , : 21.

, -
.
, , -
, ( 5 556
), .
,
. -
, . -
-
. , -
, -
21D2. , -
-
, , 2 000
. -21,
, , -
( , -
, )3.

-
. ,
- Czanj-20 (-20), -
. (Robert Gates), 11. 2011.
. -
-. -
6. ,
. -
. , -
, , , -
( ,
2011).
,
- , .
(Wall Street Journal),

2 -21 -

2 000.
3 , -

, .

466
 , vol. XLV (2011), no. 4, . 459476

, -
, -
.
, -
( INFO, -
, 2011).
, , 2010. -
, , -
( ). ,
. -
- -
, , -
- -
. ,
, '70-
: ,
, , -
(, 2011). ,
, . , -
,
.
, -
, . -
, (18-21. 2011.), -
:
(, 2011). , -
, ,
, .
, , -
,
. ,
, ,
.
.
, 19. , ,
-
, .
, , , -
, -

467
 , , : 21.

, . , -
International Energy Agency (IEA), , 2010.
, 28%, 2008. .
, : ,
(, , ) -

; , -
, ,
.
, -
, , . -
, -
,
, . , , -
,
, . ,

.

3.
, , -
. - - -
. -
, , -
, , , . -
1990. . -
, , -
1998. . ,
, , , -
. , , -
, -
.
-
.
: -
; ()
(); ;
; 201. -
;

468
 , vol. XLV (2011), no. 4, . 459476

, , -
.
-
()
; ; -
; ;
,
, -
, .
,
, ,
- . -
. . , -
60 -
; 150 , 30
24 , . , 15%
85% , 57% , 92%
96% .
,
, 76 (
17, -124), 60. (
8, -81), 161 ( 46, 104) (Wor-
ldbank, 2011).
, ,
, , -
. .
,
, ,
, , -
, . -
-
, , ,
.
, , -
,
, , -
. , . -
, -
'90- , -

469
 , , : 21.

. - -
, ,
. , -
, . -
, -
. , -
, , ,
, -
.

4.
, , -
,
. , -
, -
,
, -
. , , -
,
. ,
, -
,
-
.
, , ,
, .
, -
, , . ,

, , , ,
. ,

.
, :
; : -
, , ;
, ; -

. ( 150 300 ),

470
 , vol. XLV (2011), no. 4, . 459476

,
, , .
-
( ) 20
( , 2011).
,
, - . , , ,
. -
: ( )
( -
).
. ,
, -
. , ! , , -

, .

: -, ,
-
, , -
( -
).

, :
)
;
) ;
-
;
) 10-15
-
.
e , , , -
,
.
- - ,
, , -
. -
( ) , -

471
 , , : 21.

.
, ,
.
-
, '80- -
. . ,
20-25 , , ,
,
, , -
, , ,
. -
-
, -
.
, -
, , , -
. , -
,
. , -
,
, , () -
-
.

.
,
, , -
,
.
,
.
.
-
.
, .
( ), -
, .
, -
,

472
 , vol. XLV (2011), no. 4, . 459476

, . ,
(, , ), , -
-
, . ,
, . -
? -
-
, ?
?
, ,
? (Keane, 2010:31).
, -
, ,
, '' '' (-
, 2006: 23), .
, , -
, .
, .
, ,
.


(, 2010:440).
,
, .
( -
), .
, -
-
, (,
, 1994:201).
,
.
, , -
.
,

, -
.

473
 , , : 21.

Ahrari, J.B. (1996). The New Great Game in Muslim Central Asia. McNair Paper (47)
<http://www.ndu.edu/inss/ McNair/mcnair47/mcnair47> 26.5.2011.
, . . (2007). : -
. : .
Bentley, M. (editor). (1996). Companion to Historiography. London and New York: Routledge.
, . (2004). . : , : .
, . (2011). . 26.1.2011.<
http://www.chaskor.ru/article/hu_tszintao_v_ssha_21982> 26.5.2011
, B., , P. (1977). . : -
.
: (2008).
, 3 (12), : ;
--. (1993). . : .
, . (2011). BBC Russian. ,
<http://www.bbc.co.uk/russian/international/2011/01/110118_chinese_bank_loans.shtml>
26.5.2011.
Huntington, S. P. (1957). The Soldier and the State The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relati-
ons. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
, ., , ., , . (2010). -
. 62 (4):146-164.
Keane, J. (2010). ta je dobro u demokratiji? : M. Podunavac (prir), Drava i demokratija, Beo-
grad: Slubeni glasnik.
, K. (1983). . : .
, . (2011). , , ? <
http://www.rian.ru/analytics/20110111/320191029.html > 26.5.2011.
, . (2011). . -, 838 (31).
<http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1681739>26.5.2011;
, . (2006).
21. . : .
, X. 81968). . : .
, . (2010). . :
.
, ., , . (2011). . , (1): 24-
40.
. , , , . <http://www.rf-
agency.ru/acn/stat_ru> 26.5.2011.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. < http://www.stats.gov.cn> 26.5.2011.
. < http://vpk.name> 26.5.2011.
Nye, J. (1990). Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of AmericanPower. New York: Basic books.
Nye, J. (2004). Soft Power. New York: Public Affairs.
Paret, P. (ed.) (1986). Makers of Modern Strategy from Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age. Princeton,
New Jersy: Princeton University Press;

474
 , vol. XLV (2011), no. 4, . 459476

, ., , . (1994). . : .
, . . (2011). . <http://www.fondsk.ru>
26.5.2011;
, .. (2007). .
: .
, . . (2011). . <http://www.mgimo.ru> 26.5.2011.
25 2005 <www.kremlin.ru> 26.5.2011.
, . (2009). ? ? :
.
, . (2011). .
< http://russian.cri.cn/841/2011/05/12/1s381407.htm> 12.5.2011.
, .. (2006). XXI : . : Academia.
, IV. (1989). : .
Stratford (2011). March 10. U.S.-Russian Relations: Biden Visits Moscow <http://www.america-rus-
sia.net/eng/geopolitics/270251604> 26.5.2011.
, . (1996). . : .
The World Fact Book (2011). <www.cia.gov> 26.5.2011.
The World Factbook-Rankrder-CIA (2011). <www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbo-
ok/rankorder/2079rank.htm> 26.5.2011.
, . (1998). . : .
, B. (2010). . : . (),
, : .
(2011). < http://ru.wikipedia.org> 26.5.2011.
(2011). .info <http://zaiprotiv.info/novosti/prezident-kitaya-xu-dzintao-
dal-intervyu-amerikanskim-gazetam003289> 26.5.2011.

475
 , , : 21.

Miroslav Mladenovi Summary

University of Belgrade
Faculty of Security Studies

Jelena Ponomareva
Moskow State Institute of international Relations
(University) of the MFA of Russia

CHINA-UNITED STATES- RUSSIA: THE GLOBAL

TRIANGLE OF THE 21 ST CENTURY

After the cold war, when the Eastern block collapsed, considerable changes were made in
the world security architecture. Althought it seemed like a beginning of more certain and secu-
re era, cold war ending didnt fulfil expectations neither the main actors in the cold war con-
flict, nor the expectations of the rest of the world. Besides, collaps of one block, didnt stop
growth dynamic of new power centers. Tendencies for power are not new and unfamiliar to hu-
man. When bypolar system collapsed, other subjects started fighting for the positions. PRC ro-
le with her enormous people potential, growing economy and strengthened military is evident.
Soviet Union, accordingly Russian Federation, believed that there was no more need for streng-
htening the other block, especially when the oposite doesnt exist. But, former partners inclu-
ded the opposite side, and that made more tensions between Russia and United States. Rest of
the world didnt get better chance to create own future. On the contrary, especially for the pe-
ripheral and semiperipheral countries, new threats appeared that destabiliyed individual and
collective security. Efforts to make human communitiy rational, were always idealism and tho-
se efforts were considered utopian, but under the givven circumstances, for the international
stability, the most accseptable model is model of global triangle China, Russia, USA. Reason
why this three countries is ther specific potention: USA is powerfull technological, military and
political center, RF is worlds warehouse and China is the worlds manufacture. In the globa-
lism domination over nationalism era that model could be the optimal braking and balance
system in the international relations- political ideal that all liberal schools wanted to acchieve-
starting Lock, Montesquieu, Rousseau till today.
Key words: People Republic of China, United States of America, Russian Federation, glo-
balisation, security, collaboration

476