Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

C O M M E N T A R Y

Special session may be a good


investment for Texans
By Bill Peacock, James Quintero, and Vance Ginn
This piece originally appeared in TribTalk on July 18, 2017.

Not everyone, it seems, is excited lature uses this summers special session excessive regulation in order to reduce
about the Texas Legislature assembling to keep state and local spending under the costs of housing and doing business
in Austin for the special session set to control. in our cities.
begin on July 18. Also on the call is school choice Overall, government regulation
One common complaint by those for special-needs students. But what if can add up to 25 percent to the price of
whod prefer members stay home is the the call was expanded to include school housing units, much of that due to local
high cost of a special session to taxpay- choice for all Texas students? Texans restrictions. On the business side, one
ers. Past estimates for the cost of a 30- would not only see a tremendous finan- researcher found that permitting delays
day special session have topped $1 mil- cial benefit, but an increase in flourish- on average add 3.5 months to the devel-
lion. ing and prosperity for Texans from all opment process in Austin, while in Har-
However, if the Legislature actually economic, cultural, and ethnic back- ris County media outlets have reported
passes bills on the 20 charges specified grounds. delays of up to six months.
in the call by Gov. Greg Abbott, Texans The Texas Public Policy Founda- Imagine the benefit to Texas low-
could see a return on their investment in tions research shows that a universal to-middle income earners, who are
the special session far surpassing their educational savings account program being priced out of living in our urban
wildest expectations. would generate more than 11,000 new centers, if the Texas Legislature could
Spending caps and reform of the high school graduates by 2022. These erase even 10 percent of the cost of rent-
rollback process for property taxes new graduates would provide as much
ing or buying a home. Consumers, too,
would reduce the rapid growth of both as $5 billion in economic benefits to all
would benefit through lower prices and
state and local government spending. Texans; their chances of living in pov-
better service if businesses could operate
Previous proposals on these issues have erty as adults drop by half when they
more efficiently because the Legislature
focused on keeping spending growth obtain a high school diploma. Public-
reduced the regulatory burden placed
below population growth plus inflation, and private-school teachers would also
on them by local governments.
which would be substantially less than benefit, with budget reallocations in dis-
Citizens usually dread when their
recent growth. tricts and schools increasing the salaries
elected representatives gather to pass
For instance, local government of good teachers by as much as $28,000
direct spending in Texas from 2001 in the first year. new laws because the result is usually
through 2014, the latest Census Bureau Taxpayers would also benefit from higher taxes, more regulations, and less
data available, increased 23 percent the introduction of education choice. freedom, but the upcoming special ses-
faster than population growth plus in- Our public schools are highly inef- sion provides a unique opportunity for
flation, costing taxpayers a total annual ficient, spending almost $13,000 per the Texas Legislature to move in the
difference of an astonishing $144 billion student with dropout rates from 14 to direction of liberty and opportunity.
per the Foundations calculations. Simi- 25 percent and with only 18 percent That would be an investment well worth
larly, for the 14 years ending in 2017, of graduates meeting the SAT or ACT making.
increases in state spending outpaced college-readiness standards. Through Bill Peacock is vice president of re-
population growth plus inflation by a education choice, Texas could actually search and director of the Center for Eco-
cumulative difference of $116 billion. spend less on K-12 education over time nomic Freedom at the Texas Public Policy
In other words, if Texas taxpayers while increasing graduation rates and Foundation. Vance Ginn is an economist
had spent $1 million or so on a special improving student performance. at the Center for Fiscal Policy at the
session to limit state and local spend- Finally, Texans could see a signifi- Texas Public Policy Foundation. James
ing 14 years ago, they could have saved cant return on their $1 million invest- Quintero is director of the Center for Lo-
$260 billion over time. They could see ment in a special session as the Legisla- cal Governance at the Texas Public Policy
similar returns in the future if the Legis- ture tackles local permitting delays and Foundation.
Texas Public Policy Foundation | 901 Congress Avenue | Austin, Texas 78701 | 512.472.2700 | www.TexasPolicy.com

You might also like