Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Production Facilities: Technology Focus
Production Facilities: Technology Focus
Production Facilities
Every year, SPE organizes more than 30 conferences worldwide. Critical issues of Hisham Saadawi, SPE, is Vice
current interest to the oil industry are reflected in the SPE papers presented at these President (Engineering) for Abu Dhabi
conferences. When selecting papers for this feature, I was not surprised that many Company for Onshore Oil Operations
papers deal with topics related to safety in facilities design and to asset integrity. (ADCO). He has more than 30 years
With recent publicized accidents and the industrys continuing concern about
its public image, operating companies are focusing on process safety and improv- experience in the design, construction,
ing asset integrity, and are addressing these issues early in facilities design. startup, and operation of oil- and gas-
Indeed, it can be argued that enhancing safety performance and dealing with processing facilities. Saadawis current
the increased environmental risks remain the key challenges facing the industry areas of interest include multiphase
today. Some concepts relevant to these topics are briefly outlined. pumping, CO2 enhanced oil recovery,
Asset integrity can be defined as the ability of the asset to perform its required
technical safety, as well as training and
function effectively and efficiently while managing health, safety, and the envi-
ronment. In this context, asset integrity refers to hydrocarbon systems and development. He is a recipient of the
includes support systems and infrastructure, such as platform structures. 2011 SPE Regional Projects, Facilities,
Critical safety elements are those systems and equipment that prevent, control, and Construction Award. Saadawi is a
or mitigate major accidents. They include elements such as pressure-relief valves, 20102011 SPE Distinguished Lecturer
shutdown systems, fire- and gas-detection systems, and firefighting equipment. and an SPE course instructor. He has
Safety instrumented systems (SISs)since its publication in 2003, the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61511 standard is becoming the served on several committees and sub-
basis for the specifications and implementation of SISs in the oil industry. Initially, committees of SPE conferences and
the industry was relatively slow to adopt this standard. A dilemma facing operat- workshops, and he serves on the JPT
ing companies is what to do about the existing shutdown safety systems that were Editorial Committee. Saadawi holds a
installed before 2003 and that are not in compliance with IEC 61511. PhD degree in mechanical engineering
Papers selected for this feature along with those recommended for additional
from the University of Manchester, UK,
reading highlight industry progress in these issues. I hope that they will be of
interest to you. JPT and is a Chartered Engineer in the UK.
SPE 141174 Replacement of Existing ESD Valves With New SIL Rated
ESD Valves: A Case Study of Production Optimization and Enhancement of
Process Safety and Integrity in Kuwait Oil Company by Sadoun Mutar Bezea
Al-Khaledi, Kuwait Oil Company, et al.
The safety of an onshore facility is bly lead to equipment failure, personnel tive that the piping system be designed
a function of how safely the facil- injuries, and environmental damage. properly. Because upstream oil and gas
ity was designed. People are injured, The full-length paper details 12 key facilities are not covered specifically by
and sometimes killed, when explosions, areas for facility designers and engineers codes, it is the users responsibility to
fires, and toxic-gas releases occur at oil- to include when designing facilities for select the applicable piping code. Codes
and gas-producing facilities that were safe operation. The following is a short for process piping and for materials used
designed without including measures summary of these areas that should in H2S-containing environments in oil
that could have prevented such inci- enable designing and building safe and gas production are applicable.
dents. The safety of people and equip- facilities that reduce the risk of major
ment must be considered and included incidents. See the full-length paper for Proper Pressure Vessel. Pressure ves-
along every step in the engineering and citing of applicable recommended prac- sels are generally defined as those hav-
design of oil and gas facilities. tices, codes, and standards. ing an internal pressure greater than
15 psig and an inside diameter great-
Introduction Design-Standards Policy. Each pro- er than 6 in. The US Department of
Many wellsites, tank batteries, and pro- ducing company, no matter how small, Labor Occupational Safety and Health
duction facilities are at risk because of must implement a policy regarding the Administration (OSHA) set rules that
design or installation errors. These errors use of industry design standards that require pressure vessels used in flam-
may have occurred when the facility was can be articulated to the production mable- and combustible-liquid service
built or because the facility had been and operations groups regarding how to be built in accordance with the code
enlarged or upgraded through the years. surface facilities should be built. Setting for unfired pressure vessels set forth
Lack of proper engineering design can a design policy to use industry stan- by the American Society of Mechanical
lead to equipment failure, lost produc- dards will reduce the risk of injury to Engineers (ASME).
tion, human injury, or harm to the envi- personnel or the occurrence of an envi- The manufacturers nameplate,
ronment. Design and equipment selec- ronmental event at the facility. Most which should remain affixed perma-
tion will affect the safety and health of industry standards and regulations nently to the pressure vessel, must
perhaps generations of workers who will were developed in response to safety- display the U stamp as an indica-
be working on and near the equipment. related events and continually evolve to tion that the design, fabrication, and
incorporate lessons learned from other testing were conducted in accordance
Safe Facilities safety-related events. Building a facility with that code. To maintain the integ-
When designing a facility for a discov- to industry standards provides the user rity of pressure vessels, they must be
ery, companies may choose to make with industry-accepted safety criteria. inspected periodically. Vessels repaired
sure that all facilities are designed and or rerated as a result of an inspection,
operated in accordance with standards Site Layout for Safety. One of the should have an additional nameplate
and good engineering practices and first tasks when building a new facility added with an R stamp displayed.
with regulatory requirements. The other is to lay it out on the pad properly. In
choice is to make decisions that inevita- planning the equipment layout, one Picking the Proper Tank. According to
must obtain a plot plan of the site and OSHA, there are two types of tanks used
This article, written by Senior Technology a list of the equipment to be installed. in upstream oil and gas operations. Low-
Editor Dennis Denney, contains high- Start with placement of the most-haz- pressure tanks have a maximum allow-
lights of paper SPE 141974, Twelve ardous items on the sitevents; flares; able working pressure (MAWP) of 0.5
Steps To Engineering Safe Oil and fired process equipment; engines and to 15 psig, with OSHA requirements that
Gas Facilities, by J.E. Johnstone, rotating equipment; separators, tanks, are very similar to those for pressure ves-
SPE, and J.V. Curfew, SPE, Contek and unfired vessels; and site offices, sels. Atmospheric tanks have an MAWP
Solutions, prepared for the 2011 SPE electronic control equipment, batteries, of 0 to 0.5 psig and must be used only for
Americas E&P Health, Safety, Security, and electrical switchgear. storage of crude petroleum.
and Environmental Conference, Houston,
2123 March 2011. The paper has not Design Piping Properly. To design a Specifying Rotating Equipment for
been peer reviewed. safe and reliable facility, it is impera- Safety. Centrifugal pumps can be used
For a limited time, the full-length paper is available free to SPE members at www.jptonline.org.
The main objectives of independent ing technologies and practices used UK Offshore Installations
verification are to help substantiate in the offshore industry to update the (Safety Case) Regulation
that current oil and gas best prac- requirements and evaluate compliance. Lord Cullens report was adopted in
tices are used; to provide assurance The maintenance of detailed regula- 1992 in The Offshore Installations
that facilities have been designed to tory requirements on how to construct (Safety Case) Regulationslater re-
operate safely throughout their life- safe installations or operate them prop- vised in 2005and several support-
time; and to ensure that all health, erly is resource intensive, and these ing regulations. Named the Safety
safety, and environmental risks requirements lag behind best indus- Case Regulations (SCR), it describes a
have been managed to acceptable try practices. framework of activities that are either
and as-low-as-reasonably-practicable The owner of offshore installations required or implied to demonstrate the
(ALARP) levels. Independent verifica- must be completely knowledgeable in safety of installations. The duty holder
tion anticipates the lack of applicable the regulations (or lack thereof) of each demonstrates its intention to manage
laws or standards, especially in new country in which it operates. its installations safely through safety
environments. This approach, initially The owner of offshore installations cases and by proving achievement of
introduced in the UK after the Piper is responsible only for complying with the regulators goals. Key steps that
Alpha disaster in 1988, is becoming an individual regulatory requirements. support the safety case are presented in
industry standard. Particularities of each offshore in- the following subsections.
stallation are not considered and, as
Introduction such, may not be analyzed as a whole, Identification of Major-Accident
A prescriptive approach to safety and within the context in which they Hazards (MAHs). To define the safety
environmental management of offshore operate. goals for an installation, the first step
installations relies on a selection of Complex working situations occur comprises identifying MAHs. The SCR
specific regulatory requirements devel- on offshore installations, possibly creat- defines a major accident as:
oped for all phases from design to ing dangerous conditions that must be Fire, explosion, or the release of a
decommissioning, which are imposed examined carefully and organized in dangerous substance involving death
by a regulator. The owners of the off- the best way possiblethe details of or serious personal injury
shore installations must follow exist- which cannot be foreseen in a prescrip- Any event involving major damage
ing standards, practices, guidelines, tive approach. to the structure of the installation or
and procedures. The same regulator loss of its stability
will evaluate the compliance through Goal-Setting Approach Collision of a helicopter with the
review, auditing, and inspections of The goal-setting approach was intro- installation
plans, permits, and related documents. duced through Lord Cullens 1990 Accidents linked to diving activities
Relying on this approach alone has report on the Piper Alpha disaster. Any other event arising from a
revealed several disadvantages. Instead of imposing rules, the regula- work activity involving death or serious
The regulator must understand and tor proposed specific quantifiable goals personal injury to five or more persons
be capable of keeping up with evolv- that the offshore installations owners The duty holder can extend this defi-
must meet. Hence, the owners have nition with additional requirements,
This article, written by Senior Technology flexibility on how they will meet these such as environmental concerns or
Editor Dennis Denney, contains highlights goals. An important change is that the economical or reputation effects.
of paper SPE 136392, Independent responsibility for managing safety and
Verification of Safety-Critical Elements, environmental aspects rests on the Strategy for Risk Reduction. UK regu-
by Julien Marty, Sophie Theys, SPE, duty holder, which is either the owner lations require a hierarchy of strategies
Christian Bucherie, Andy Bolsover, or the operator of the offshore instal- for managing and reducing risk from
and Philippe Cambos, Bureau Veritas, lation. The goal-setting approach does MAHs and adherence to the ALARP
prepared for the 2010 SPE Russian Oil & not exclude prescriptive regulations. principles. Hence, this step comprises
Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition, Often, hybrid solutions use elements finding ways to reasonably reduce the
Moscow, 2628 October. The paper has from both goal-setting and prescrip- risk for each MAH. A typical risk-
not been peer reviewed. tive approaches. management hierarchy prioritizes risk-
For a limited time, the full-length paper is available free to SPE members at www.jptonline.org.
For a limited time, the full-length paper is available free to SPE members at www.jptonline.org.
Registration Deadline
23 January 2012
www.iptcnet.org/2011
SCAN ME TO
DOWNLOAD NOW
Host Organisation: Supported by: Ofcial Airline: Sponsored by:
For more information, please contact International Petroleum Technology Conference (IPTC)
c/o SPE Asia Pacific Office (Kuala Lumpur)
Suite 23-02, Level 23, Centrepoint South, Mid Valley City Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: 60.3.2288.1233; 60.3.2182.3000 Fax: 60.32282.1200; 60.3.2182.3030 E-mail: iptc@iptcnet.org
Register Now
68 March 2012
San Diego, California, USA
Town & Country Resort & Convention Center
www.spe.org/events/dc
www.tamintl.com
EQUIPMENT MATTERS