Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No Srat 2015
No Srat 2015
Abstract
Introduction: Although the internal anatomy of
mandibular molars has been extensively studied, infor-
mation about middle mesial (MM) canals is limited.
T he aim of root canal therapy is to eliminate all irritants from the root canal system.
These irritants include necrotic pulp tissue, microorganisms, and their byproducts.
A detailed knowledge of the pulp canal anatomy is necessary to effectively clean and
The primary aim of this retrospective study was to eval- shape the root canal system. Mandibular molars are the most frequent tooth type to
uate the incidence of MM canals in mandibular first and be endodontically treated (1). Traditionally, mandibular molars are described as 2-
second molars. The secondary aim was to correlate the rooted teeth with 2 canals in the mesial root and 1 or 2 canals in the distal root (2).
incidence of MM canals with variables of molar type, However, studies have shown several variations in the anatomy of mandibular molars
sex, age, ethnicity, and presence of a second distal ca- that are thought to be determined by race and genetics (3). These variations include
nal. Methods: All mature permanent first and second a separate distolingual root (4), C-shaped anatomy of the roots and/or canals (5),
mandibular molars treated from August 2012 to May an isthmus between the mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual (ML) canals (6), and a
2014 were included in the analysis. After completion third canal in the mesial root known as the middle mesial (MM) canal (7).
of root canal instrumentation in all main canals, the The reported prevalence of the MM canal in mandibular molars varies among
clinician inspected the isthmus area of the mesial root studies. Methods of detection include plastic casts (2), clearing (8), scanning electron
using the dental operating microscope. If there was a microscopy (9), microcomputed tomographic (mCT) imaging (10), and use of a file
catch point in this area with a file or explorer, the oper- under magnification (11).
ator spent more time attempting to negotiate an MM ca- Based on the method used, the prevalence of the MM canal ranged from 0% (2) to
nal. Results: Seventy-five mandibular first and 36% (10). Clinical studies on negotiable MM canals show results different from studies
second molars were treated during the specified period. involving extracted teeth. Two older clinical studies reported an incidence of 2.6% and
Fifteen (20%) teeth had negotiable MM canals. The inci- 12% for negotiable MM canals (7, 12).
dence of MM canals was 32.1% in patients #20 years Pomeranz et al (7) described the anatomy of MM canals as follows: (1) fin: The file
old, 23.8% in patients 2140 years old, and 3.8% in pa- passes freely between the main mesial canal (ML or MB) and the MM canal (transverse
tients >40 years. Analysis of data revealed a significant anatomies), (2) confluent: The MM canal originates as a separate orifice but apically
difference in the distribution of MM canals among joins the MB or ML canal, and (3) independent: The MM canal originates as a separate
different age groups (P < .05). The differences in the dis- orifice and terminates as a separate apical foramen.
tribution of MM canals based on sex, ethnicity, molar Clinical studies show that magnification significantly increases the probability of
type, and presence of a second distal canal were not sig- locating and negotiating a second MB canal in maxillary molars (1315). Compared
nificant. Conclusions: The incidence of negotiable MM with the dental operating microscope, there was no significant difference when loupes
canals overall and their frequency of identification in were used (13). In an attempt to locate and negotiate MM canals in mandibular molars,
younger patients were higher than in previous reports. investigators showed in vitro that using the dental operating microscope can increase the
(J Endod 2014;-:16) number of located and negotiated canals (11). To date, there are no studies that report
the incidence of negotiable MM canals in mandibular first and second molars using the
Key Words dental operating microscope. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence
Dental operating microscope, isthmus, mandibular of negotiable MM canals in mandibular first and second molars using the dental operating
molar, middle mesial canal, root canal anatomy microscope for magnification. The secondary aim was to correlate the incidence of MM
canals with variables including molar type (first or second mandibular molar), sex, age,
ethnicity, and the presence of a second distal canal.
From the Department of Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Materials and Methods
Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Mary-
land, Baltimore, Maryland. The study period was from August 2012 to May 2014. All cases with mature first
Address requests for reprints to Dr Ashraf Fouad, Depart- and second permanent mandibular molars referred to the first author for nonsurgical
ment of Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry, root canal treatment or retreatment and had treatment completed after informed con-
School of Dentistry, University of Maryland, 650 W Baltimore sent were included. The data were extracted from the Maryland endodontic record un-
Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. E-mail address: afouad@
umaryland.edu der a protocol previously determined to be exempt by the Institutional Review Board at
0099-2399/$ - see front matter the University of Maryland.
Copyright 2014 American Association of Endodontists.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.004 Root Canal Treatment Procedures
After local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation, carious dentin and all defective
restorations were removed. If there were no caries visible clinically or in bitewing
TABLE 1. The Frequency Distribution (%) of Middle Mesial Canals (MMCs) in Mandibular Molars (N = 75) Based on Sex, Age, and Ethnicity
Sex, n (%) Age, n (%) Ethnicity, n (%)
Figure 1. (A) A preoperative view of tooth #30 in a 20-year-old black man. (B) A distal angle radiograph after obturation. The orifice of the MM canal is located
close to the MB canal orifice. The MM canal showed confluent anatomy and joined the ML canal in the apical third. (C) A straight-on view of the tooth after
obturation. (D) A magnified view (8) of the 3 mesial canals.
Figure 2. (A) A preoperative radiograph of tooth #30 in a 16-year-old black man. (B) A distal angle radiograph after obturation. The MM canal orifice is located
close to the orifice of the MB canal. The MM canal showed a separate apical foramen (independent anatomy). (C) A mesial angle radiograph after obturation. (D)
A magnified view (8) of the 3 mesial canals.
reduction in the complex root canal system. In an in vitro study on the cians ability to visualize the anatomy of the pulp chamber (11, 14).
effectiveness of Self Adjusting Files (ReDent Nova Ltd, Raanana, Israel) Our study is the first in vivo evaluation of the incidence of MM
in removing bacterial biofilm from the mesial root of mandibular canals using the dental operating microscope. The high incidence
molars, no difference between Self Adjusting Files and other rotary (20%) of MM canals in this study is likely attributable to the use of
files was found (26). the microscope.
The negotiation of MM canals with hand/rotary files provides ac- Several of our anatomic findings regarding MM canals are
cess for irrigating solutions into the otherwise inaccessible isthmus. We consistent with other studies. Pomeranz et al (7) reported that the
hypothesize that negotiation and chemomechanical preparation of the orifice of the MM canal was always located close to the ML canal.
isthmus area can substantially reduce the bacterial biofilm and bacterial Our findings were similar for the majority of teeth with a separate
load. We also hypothesize that this reduction in bacterial biofilm may MM orifice (8/10). Only 2 of 10 (20%) of teeth had the orifice of
improve the outcome of nonsurgical root canal treatment in mandibular the MM canal located near the MB canal (Figs. 1 and 2). Our
molars. Clinical outcomes studies with long-term follow-ups are needed findings were also consistent with the observations made under
to test these hypotheses. magnification in a recent ex vivo study on extracted mandibular
Anatomic variations of mandibular molars such as the distolingual molars (11). A separate apical foramen for an MM canal was a
root/canal and C-shaped root/canal anatomy are well recognized by end- rare finding (7, 11, 12). Nevertheless, in the present study, 20%
odontic clinicians. Studies have shown an overall prevalence of 13% for (3/15) of the MM canals had a separate apical foramen
distolingual root in mandibular first molars (20) with a higher preva- (independent anatomy). Pomeranz et al (7) reported that the
lence of 22% (4) to 28.5% (27) in Asian ethnic groups. Studies have most prevalent anatomy was a fin (67%). Karapinar-Kazandag
shown a prevalence of 10%31.5% for C-shaped anatomy in mandibular et al (11) found that all MM canals showed a confluent anatomy.
second molars in different Asian populations (5, 28). However, in this No independent or fin anatomy was found. In our study, the
study, the prevalence of a distolingual root and C-shaped anatomy was most prevalent (46.7%) anatomy was confluent.
less than other reports. This may be related to the fact that no patients In conclusion, using magnification and careful tactile search tech-
of Asian heritage were included in the patient sample. niques, the incidence of MM canals in mandibular molars was found to
In contrast, data on the incidence/prevalence of MM canals are be higher than previously reported. The probability of finding and nego-
limited. Clinical studies on the incidence of negotiable MM canals are tiating an MM canal in younger patients is significantly higher than in
limited to those performed in the 1980s without using magnification older individuals. Using the operating microscope is key to locating
(7, 12). Pomeranz et al (7) reported the highest incidence (12%). It and negotiating MM canals. Clinical studies with long-term follow-ups
is now well documented that using magnification enhances the clini- are needed to determine the effect of preparation of MM canals on
Figure 3. (A) A preoperative view of tooth #31 in an 18-year-old white man. (B) A distal angle view of the gutta-percha cone fit. There are 2 fins in the mesial
root adjacent to the MB and ML canals. (C) A mesial angle radiograph after obturation. (D) A magnified view (8) of the access cavity. Note the presence of fins
adjacent to the MB and ML canals.
the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment in mandibular first 11. Karapinar-Kazandag M, Basrani BR, Friedman S. The operating microscope en-
and second molars. hances detection and negotiation of accessory mesial canals in mandibular molars.
J Endod 2010;36:128994.
12. Fabra-Campos H. Three canals in the mesial root of mandibular first permanent mo-
lars: a clinical study. Int Endod J 1989;22:3943.
Acknowledgments 13. Buhrley LJ, Barrows MJ, BeGole EA, Wenckus CS. Effect of magnification on locating
The authors deny any conflict of interest related to this study. the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. J Endod 2002;28:3247.
14. Baldassari-Cruz LA, Lilly JP, Rivera EM. The influence of dental operating micro-
scope in locating the mesiolingual canal orifice. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:1904.
References 15. Rampado ME, Tjaderhane L, Friedman S, Hamstra SJ. The benefit of the operating
1. Hull TE, Robertson PB, Steiner JC, del Aguila MA. Patterns of endodontic care for a microscope for access cavity preparation by undergraduate students. J Endod 2004;
Washington state population. J Endod 2003;29:5536. 30:8637.
2. Skidmore AE, Bjorndal AM. Root canal morphology of the human mandibular first 16. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr, Bate AL, Pitt Ford TR. Histologic investigation of root canal-
molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:77884. treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a retrospective study from twenty-four pa-
3. Curzon ME. Miscegenation and the prevalence of three-rooted mandibular first mo- tients. J Endod 2009;35:493502.
lars in the Baffin Eskimo. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1974;2:1301. 17. Nair PN. On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J 2006;
4. Huang RY, Cheng WC, Chen CJ, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the root 39:24981.
morphology of mandibular first molars with distolingual roots. Int Endod J 2010; 18. Teixeira FB, Sano CL, Gomes BP, et al. A preliminary in vitro study of the incidence
43:47884. and position of the root canal isthmus in maxillary and mandibular first molars. Int
5. Zhang R, Wang H, Tian YY, et al. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to eval- Endod J 2003;36:27680.
uate root and canal morphology of mandibular molars in Chinese individuals. Int 19. Fan B, Pan Y, Gao Y, et al. Three-dimensional morphologic analysis of isthmuses in
Endod J 2011;44:9909. the mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod 2010;36:18669.
6. Gu L, Wei X, Ling J, Huang X. A microcomputed tomographic study of canal isth- 20. de Pablo OV, Estevez R, Peix Sanchez M, et al. Root anatomy and canal configuration
muses in the mesial root of mandibular first molars in a Chinese population. of the permanent mandibular first molar: a systematic review. J Endod 2010;36:
J Endod 2009;35:3536. 191931.
7. Pomeranz HH, Eidelman DL, Goldberg MG. Treatment considerations of the middle 21. von Arx T, Steiner RG, Tay FR. Apical surgery: endoscopic findings at the resection
mesial canal of mandibular first and second molars. J Endod 1981;7:5658. level of 168 consecutively treated roots. Int Endod J 2011;44:290302.
8. Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng YL. Root and canal morphology of Burmese 22. Toure B, Faye B, Kane AW, et al. Analysis of reasons for extraction of endodontically
mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2001;34:35970. treated teeth: a prospective study. J Endod 2011;37:15125.
9. Navarro LF, Luzi A, Garcia AA, Garcia AH. Third canal in the mesial root of perma- 23. Susin L, Liu Y, Yoon JC, et al. Canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two irri-
nent mandibular first molars: review of the literature and presentation of 3 clinical gant agitation techniques in a closed system. Int Endod J 2010;43:107790.
reports and 2 in vitro studies. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007;12:E6059. 24. Gutarts R, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M. In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic
10. Harris SP, Bowles WR, Fok A, McClanahan SB. An anatomic investigation of the mandib- irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars.
ular first molar using micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2013;39:13748. J Endod 2005;31:16670.