Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 3
Chapter 3
METHODOLOGY
Project Design
This study used the experimental method to determine the most effective
combination of waste Endocarp of the Mango as raw material with isocyanate resin. The
composite board that was developed using the following composition was subjected to
considered. The first variable is the proportion (%) of endocarp of the mango and
isocyanate and secondly, the board densities. Three board densities were considered. All
The design parameters in this study adopted the existing design parameters for
CBB using Kauyan Tinik from the Forest Product Research and Development Institute by
Project Development
The waste endocarp of the mango is the main component used in this study.
Preliminary, waste endocarp of mangoes are shredded and dried for 3 days. Two
replications per treatment level will be subjected to Modulus of Rupture, Nail Head Pull
Thru, and Thickness Swelling and Water Absorption test respectively for each
composition.
Gathering of Materials
Preparation of Materials
Molding
Pressing
Curing
Trimming
The following are the methods and procedures of particle board development
1. Gathering of Materials
Waste Endocarp of mangoes will collect from the Sancorp Best Fruit,
2. Material Preparation
3. Mixing of materials
a container, mix the isocyanate and pour it into the mixture. Mix it properly.
4. Molding of Specimen
5. Pressing of Specimen
After the moulding process, the specimen will undergo in the process
within 24 hours.
4
6. Curing of Specimen
Place the board in a drying area to protect it from getting wet and let
Trim the board into its test pieces. For modulus of rupture cut 3 pcs
50 mm x 230 mm board per treatment level, for Face Screw Holding 3 pcs
100mm x 50 mm board per treatment level and for the thickness swelling and
8. Testing of Boards
The testing of specimen was done after 3 curing days .In completion
of the study, the specimen will undergo through Physical and Mechanical
Testing Procedures
All Testing procedure were in accordance to the PNS 230:1989 Specification for
Particle Board.
5
Physical Properties
The Thickness Swelling (TS) and Water Absorption (WA) are the tests conducted
to measure the moisture resistance of the particleboard and determine the moisture
its side 2.5 cm away from the edge of the test specimen, and use the average
d. After 24 hours, remove the specimen and allow draining vertically for 10
minutes;
Mechanical Properties
The Modulus of Rupture (MOR) is a test conducted that measures the flexural
a. Using a standard testing machine with apparatus. Carefully place the specimen in
the Universal Testing Machine below the center of the upper bearing block;
b. Apply a load to the surface of the test specimen at a uniform rate of about 5
The Face Screw Holding (FSH) is a test conducted on screws threaded into the
a. The specimen shall be at least 2.5 cm thick, otherwise, glue two or more pieces
b. Using a 2.8 mm diameter drill, bore lead holes into the test specimen 17 mm at
d. Perform the test immediately after the screw has been embedded;
e. Attached the specimen holding fixture to the lower plate of the testing machine;
7
f. Insert the specimen in the fixture with the head of the screws up;
g. Engage the head of the screws by the load applying fixture with a slot for easy
attachment;
h. Attach this loading fixture to the upper plate of the testing machine;
i. Apply load to the specimen throughout the test by a uniform motion of the
Evaluation Procedure
Developed Prototype was used to determine the acceptability of Particle Boards with the
following criteria: Aesthetics, Workability, Durability, Economy, Safety and Sale ability.
1. Evaluation forms were distributed to five (5) Project Managers, five (5) Building
2. After explaining the details, the respondents rated the product for the above
mentioned criteria based on the Likert Scales as shown in Table 3. One (1) being
the lowest (Poor) and five (5) being the highest (Highly Acceptable);
3. Evaluation results were tabulated to compute for the mean of each criterion and
Table 2.
Likert Scale
Numerical Scale Interpretation
5 Highly Acceptable
4 Very Acceptable
3 Acceptable
2 Fairly Acceptable
1 Not acceptable
Table 3.