11 Malmaison 1600

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 23

Intuitive, parametric and topology

optimization applied on rollover protective


structures of agriculture tractors

Igor Saveljevas Rodrigues


VirtualCAE
PRESENTATION TOPICS

Company Overview (2-3 minutes);

Problem Description;

Methodology;

Goals;

Conclusion and next steps.


VirtualCAE
Problem Description

Reduce costs of the ROPS


6.218 wheeled tractors per year
(ANFAVEA 2014)

Min : R$ 50.000,00
Max : R$ 73.500,00
Methodology

Modify the material to reduce costs. However


ensuring the safe criteria
Test materials: SAE 1010, S420 MC, S500 MC
How? Using optimization
Intuitive
Parametric
Topology
ABNT NBR ISO 5700:2009

Static test method and acceptance conditions for


ROPS

Rear longitudinal OECD


Rear Crush 12003-1
Side 12003-2
Front Crush ISO 5700:2015

E = 1,4 mt
Intuitive

Change plastic strain location

Original
ASTM A500 grade C
Energy : 1960 J
Superior tube has not
plastic strain
Intuitive

How? Change superior tube to SAE 1010


Why? More space to deformation.
Intuitive upper ROPS SAE 1010

Design 1
Superior tube : SAE 1010
Inferior tube : ASTM A 500
grade C
Parametric
Parametric model validation

Same strain energy


Parametric
Parametric SAE 1010

Design 2
Both tubes as SAE 1010
Topology

Design extended First design Test Final design


Topology

[ASTM A 500 GRADE C] : E = 1960J [SAE 1010] : E = 3096J


S420MC

There is the possibility to reduce thickness.


S420MC

Instead of earning by a
cheap material, you earn
reducing the total weight.

In this case, 25% less


weight.
S500MC

In this case, 35% less


weight.

The rise of the yield


strenth implies in the
raise of the strain energy.
Validation
How much?
Conclusion

$
S500MC
S420MC

Original

SAE 1010
Conclusion

$
S500MC
S420MC

Original

S500MC S420MC SAE 1010


Next steps

Optimize a complete cabin

You might also like