Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Et Al.,: in The United States District Court For The District of Columbia
Et Al.,: in The United States District Court For The District of Columbia
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
The parties jointly move the Court for a 30-day extension of briefing deadlines in view of
the U.S. Food and Drug Administrations announcement of a new comprehensive plan for the
regulation of tobacco products. In support of this motion, the parties state as follows:
1. Plaintiffs challenge, among other things, U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) rules that deem cigars and pipe tobacco to be tobacco products subject to FDA
regulation and that assess users fees on manufacturers and importers in some, but not all, of the
newly-regulated tobacco product industries to fund the regulatory scheme. See FDA, Deeming
Tobacco Products To Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as Amended by
the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; Restrictions on the Sale and
1
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Dr. Thomas Price and Dr. Scott Gottlieb are substituted for
their predecessors in office.
Case 1:16-cv-01460-APM Document 40 Filed 08/01/17 Page 2 of 4
Distribution of Tobacco Products and Required Warning Statements for Tobacco Products, No.
FDA-2014-N-0189, 81 Fed. Reg. 28,973 (May 10, 2016), and Requirements for the Submission of
Data Needed to Calculate User Fees for Domestic Manufacturers and Importers of Cigars and Pipe
2. Plaintiffs filed their motion for summary judgment on February 13, 2017. See ECF
No. 22. Under the current briefing schedule, Defendants opposition and cross-motion are due on
August 1; Plaintiffs reply and opposition are due on September 14; and Defendants reply is due
on October 16. See id. Oral argument is currently scheduled for December 8. See id.
3. After the recent change in administrations, the Court granted two similar joint
motions to extend briefing deadlines, together extending those deadlines by a total of four months,
to allow new leadership personnel at the Department of Health and Human Services additional
time to more fully consider the Rules and the issues raised in this case and determine how best to
proceed. See Minute Order (Mar. 22, 2017); Order (May 2, 2017) (ECF No. 35).
4. On July 28, 2017, the FDA announced a new comprehensive plan for the
regulation of tobacco products. FDA, Press Release, FDA Announces Comprehensive Regulatory
Plan to Shift Trajectory of Tobacco-Related Disease, Death (July 28, 2017), available at
https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/ PressAnnouncements/UCM568923.htm.
5. As part of that plan, the FDA announced that it intends to issue guidance describing
a new enforcement policy that, among other things, would extend until August 2021 the
compliance period for submitting applications for newly-regulated combustible products such as
cigars and pipe tobacco that were on the market as of August 8, 2016, and the FDA expects that
manufacturers would continue to market the products while those applications are pending. Id.
The agency also intends to issue Advanced Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRMs)
seeking, among other things, public comment on (a) the role that flavors in tobacco products play
2
Case 1:16-cv-01460-APM Document 40 Filed 08/01/17 Page 3 of 4
in attracting youth and (b) the patterns of use and resulting public health impacts of premium
cigars. Id. And the agency intends to issue regulations outlining the information it expects to be
included in SE reports, PMTAs, and modified risk tobacco product (MRTP) applications. Id.
6. The approach outlined in the FDAs new comprehensive plan may affect several
claims raised in this case. Accordingly, the parties respectfully seek a 30-day extension of the
August 1 deadline for Defendants to file an opposition to Plaintiffs motion for summary
judgment, as well as the parties subsequent opposition and reply deadlines, to consider the
consequences of the new comprehensive plan on this litigation, to discuss ways to reduce the need
to litgate some of the issues presented in this case, and, if necessary, to confer regarding the most
efficient path forward for presenting any remaining challenges to the Rules.
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court extend briefing deadlines in
3
Case 1:16-cv-01460-APM Document 40 Filed 08/01/17 Page 4 of 4
4
Case 1:16-cv-01460-APM Document 40-1 Filed 08/01/17 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties joint motion to amend the scheduling order, it is hereby
FURTHER ORDERED that the [35] scheduling order in this case is amended as follows:
Briefs of any amici granted leave to file in support of Defendants shall be filed by:
September 7, 2017
Plaintiffs reply in support of their motion for summary judgment and opposition to
Defendants cross-motion for summary judgment shall be filed by: October 16, 2017
Defendants reply in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment shall be filed
by: November 15, 2017
1
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Dr. Thomas Price and Dr. Scott Gottlieb are substituted for
their predecessors in office.
Case 1:16-cv-01460-APM Document 40-1 Filed 08/01/17 Page 2 of 2
Plaintiffs shall file the appendix of excerpts of the administrative record by: November
29, 2017
Oral argument shall be rescheduled for a date and time that suits the Court.
SO ORDERED.