Rights Of Fetus And Mother In The Abortion Debate

In recent years, abortion [1] has become a live topic both at national and international...

CHAPTER 1

I. Introduction..

II. Issues addressed by the paper

III. Hypotheses put forward in the paper.

CHAPTER 2

I. Rights of the Mother V. Rights of the Fetus....................................................

II. Abortion and Right of fetus..

Fetus has right to life.

Abortion is violation of fetuss right to life.

III. Abortion and Right of mother.........

Fetus does not have right to life..

Violation of right to liberty of mother..

Right to privacy........

Right to dignity and health........

CHAPTER 3

I. SUGGESTIONS..

CHAPTER 4

I. Conclusion.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Word Count (Excluding Footnotes, references)-

CHAPTER 1
I. Introduction
In recent years, abortion [1] has become a live topic both at national and international levels, attracting great
academic, legislative and judicial comments. Abortion is in many jurisdictions, a crime; though the sanctions for its
violation differ. Its incidence in the world is increasing rather than decreasing.

This law essay is an example of a student's work

Disclaimer
This essay has been submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies. This is not an example of the
work written by our professional law writers.

Law Essay Writing ServiceLaw Assignment Writing ServiceLaw Coursework Writing Service

Who wrote this essay?Freelance Writing JobsPlace an Order

When confronted with the question of legal regulation of abortion, some argue that law should not compel an
individual to carry an unwanted pregnancy and that "the State has no business in the bedrooms of the nation". [2] On
the contrary, most of the religious heads and some others argue that "the child in the womb has the right to life, to
the life he already possesses and no one has authority to deny it"; [3] and hence law should regulate abortion with
iron hands. Even within the medical profession itself, there is a great divergence of views. Some are of the opinion
that the womans desire is a sufficient justification. [4] On the other hand, there are doctors who for purely religious
reasons object abortion in toto. [5] It is submitted that both the views are extreme and hence not sound. Mere desire
of a woman to be relieved of her pregnancy should not be the sole justification for performing abortion. At the same
time, where abortion is necessary to save the life of a woman, the doctors refusal on religious grounds may lead to
her death making him guilty of manslaughter by negligence. Here arose the debate of right of fetus and right of
mother.

The laws regarding abortion vary widely by country to country. Some states like Chile, El
Salvador, Nicaragua, Malta and Vatican City ban the procedure of abortion exclusively. No exception is available
for these strict rules. On contrary, some states like Canada and the United States of America and many other places
no restriction on the provisions relating abortion. They are having the most liberal attitude towards abortion and
right of mother to choose her pregnancy. Both the supporters and the opponents of legal abortion take a pose that
their arguments address the fundamental human right.

For the purpose of conducting research, the project has been divided into four chapters.

The project starts with a general introduction on abortion and abortion debate and its position in the globe.

The second chapter deals with the abortion debate. Arguments on both fetal right groups and right to choose group,
on the perspective of right has been discussed in this chapter.

The third chapter deals with the discussions of different scholars like Dworkin, Judith Thomson and Rawls on
abortion debate. In the very chapter, the paper is pointing out the suggestion regarding abortion debate and making
its stand.

Finally the fourth chapter concludes the paper.

II. Issues Addressed By The Paper:

In the light of abortion debate, following research questions are addressed by the paper.

Whether the government has an obligation to preserve all human life regardless their viability?

Does fetus have the status of a legal person?

Whether individuals have unlimited autonomy with respect to their own reproductive systems?

Does the government have the right to impede a woman's right to decide whether or not to continue a pregnancy?

III. Hypothesis Put Forward By The Paper

This paper is intended to analyze the rights of mother and fetus in the perspective of abortion. The paper has put
forward the following hypotheses,

The government should protect the reproductive rights of mother.

Though it does not have any interest of its own, a fetus has no right to life. Abortion in such a case, does not amount
to violation of right to life.

Any laws which criminalizes or prohibiting abortion is violation of womans right to privacy, right to dignity, right
to health, right to liberty and ultimately the right to life.

CHAPTER 2
I. Rights of the Mother V. Rights of the Foetus

Women have the same rights as other people, but these are often seemed to be in conflict with those of her unborn
child. Maternal-fetal conflict describes the ways that law, social policies and medical practices sometimes treat a
pregnant womans interests in opposition to those of the fetus. This dichotomy creates a justification for restricting
the autonomy of the pregnant woman. [6] Different arguments of these two groups, on violation of right, are
addressed in this chapter.

II. Abortion And Right Of Fetus

Roe v. Wade [7] 's granting of constitutional protection for the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy was, in
many ways, just the beginning of the true abortion rights debate. The rights of the unborn are a main issue in this
debate--mainly whether they have rights as a human person that could protect their lives from ending before birth.
While the Court has since declined to officially and fully address the issue, there is a growing recognition of the
personhood of the unborn child both from a medical and social standpoint.

This law essay is an example of a student's work

Disclaimer
This essay has been submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies. This is not an example of the
work written by our professional law writers.

Law Essay Writing ServiceLaw Assignment Writing ServiceLaw Coursework Writing Service

Who wrote this essay?Freelance Writing JobsPlace an Order

Fetal rights are the legal or ethical rights of fetuses. In the context of abortion debates, fetal right is used as an
argument in support of pro-life stand. The term Pro-life deals with the political and ethical opposition to the system
of abortion, and asks for the legal prohibition or restriction of the same. The main claim of these pro-life movements
is that fetus is a person. Therefore a fetus has a right to life. The pro-life stance is commonly supported by
several religions. Pro-life persons argue that the value of human life is of supreme importance and believe that
human life should be valued from fertilization until natural death. That is, a fetus is a person and any action which
destroys an embryo or fetus is murder of a person. Any deliberate destruction of human life is considered ethically
or morally wrong. The arguments of these schools of thought are discussed below.

Fetus Has Right To Life

Today, there is a trend toward recognizing the unborn as both a human as well as a person afforded lawful
protection. Modern scientific advances in the understanding of human development show that the fetus is indeed a
human being from her first day of existence [8] .

The scientific and medical community has widely recognized the existence of human life from the very moment of
conception. Many contemporary human embryologists maintain that a new human being comes to be at fertilization,
which is the point at which the maternal and paternal chromosomes merge to form a set [9] .

At the time a woman become pregnant, she is carrying a new life. Science has proved that she is carrying a new
human being from the moment of fertilization. Science has proved that, heart of the fetus will start to beat from 18-
25 days and from the 43rd day itself electrical brainwave will start working. The absence of brain wave means
indicates death. So at the time of abortion, the baby already has a beating heart and identified brain waves. So the
baby living inside his/her mother is a distinct and unique person or human being.

The modern understanding of biologists is that the discovery of human DNA after just a few days of fertilization
irrefutably demonstrates that the child, no matter how small, "is human life; it is not potential life or potentially
human life." [10] Thus, "It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception, when
egg and sperm join." This is no theory: scientific proof of a separate embryonic personhood is an indisputable and
fundamental truth--a human being exists from conception [11]

"In fusing together, the male and female gametes produce a fertilized single cell, the zygote, which is the start of a
new individual." [12] So the fetus is fully developed even before the mothers pregnancy gets noticed.

Thus the fetus is a person from the conception itself and the new person deserves full protection of the law as any
other person. The fetus has a right to life and the government is obliged to protect the supreme right.

B) Abortion Is Violation Of Fetuss Right To Life

Medical and scientific research has proven that life begins at conception [13] . Thus abortion is akin to murder as it
is the fact of taking human life. Abortion is direct disobedience of the commonly accepted idea of the sanctity of
human life.

No civilized societies in the globe permit a person to intentionally harm or take life of another person. Such an act is
offence everywhere and is punishable. Abortion is not an exception or not a different to this general principle. The
process of abortion is nothing but taking life of a person. So such an act of taking life of a person should not be
allowed.

A mother cannot claim that it is my body and absolutely my choice". Though fetus is a person, he/she has the right
to life. According to pro-life advocates, Mothers action should not infringe the right of fetus because right to life is
the supreme right for a human being.

Viability, however, is not a useful concept in the feticide context. Viability occurs at different points in different
pregnancies and requires medical expertise to diagnose. Except in the very last stages of pregnancy, no one other
than a physician could be expected to know the fetus is viable [14]

This law essay is an example of a student's work

Disclaimer
This essay has been submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies. This is not an example of the
work written by our professional law writers.
Law Essay Writing ServiceLaw Assignment Writing ServiceLaw Coursework Writing Service

Who wrote this essay?Freelance Writing JobsPlace an Order

The fetus's life interest still warrants the state's protection under these circumstances, and the unwanted termination
of the pregnancy must be separately recognized and vindicated. A crime that results in the death of a fetus,
regardless of the specific knowledge of the actor, is objectively more traumatic and culpable than violence
committed against a non-pregnant person because two separate harms result. [15]

The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany has addressed the issue of abortion and fetal right in 1975, two years
after Roe v. Wade [16] .In the judgment [17] , the court held that respect of human dignity requires the
criminalization of abortion.

The court has considered the full range of arguments for abortion [18] , and then it specifically rejected the main
points of reasoning in Roe v. Wade as well as its "term solution" as inconsistent with the constitutional guarantee of
the right to life. The Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany [19] guarantees that Everyone has the right to
life" and it must be extended to the life of the unborn. In 1993, the Federal Constitutional
Court of Germany [20] held that [21] life begins, according to the established biological-physiological knowledge,
on the 14th day after conception" and the constitution guarantees the right to life to a fetus and recognizes him/her as
a legal person from conception itself.

Many Legislative measures have been taken in order to assign a fetus the right to life even from the time of
fertilization. Such a kind of law intends to give the fetus the same status as that of every member of the Homo
sapiens species.

Article 4.1 of the American Convention on Human Rights, 1978 [22] states "Every person has the right to have his
life respected. This right shall be protected by law and, in general, from the moment of conception."

In 1983, the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland, which is known as the "Pro-Life Amendment," has
been added by popular referendum. The amendment has recognized "the right to life of the unborn".

III. Abortion And Right Of Mother

Mature woman, as mature human beings with all respect and dignity to be awarded the right to decide whether or
not they carry a specific pregnancy to term. [23] In Roe, it was held that a womans right to choose not to bear a
child was fundamental and could not be infringed. Right to privacy found broad enough to encompass a womans
decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.

The pro-life schools ask for the right of fetus and demand for abolition of abortion. But here occurs a violation on
the right of mother for choice. Pro-choice is a school of thought and movement which demands the protection of the
rights of the mother to choose her fertility. Accordingly, a woman has a right to choose whether to continue or
terminate her pregnancy.

Pro-choice advocates argue whether or not to continue with a pregnancy is an inviolable personal choice, as it
involves a woman's body, personal health, and future. They believe that both parents' and children's lives are better
when abortions are legal, thus preventing women from going to desperate lengths to obtain illegal abortions. More
broadly, pro-choice advocates frame their beliefs in terms of individual liberty, reproductive freedom, and
reproductive rights.
A) Fetus Does Not Have Right To Life
Another argument on this side is that, embryo is not a legal person, thus it does not have any right. So there is no
matter of violation of any personal rights if one got aborted.

When Roe v. Wade was decided, Pro-choice activists celebrated their "staggering victory," calling the Supreme
Court opinion a "thunderbolt". [24] The core of Roe's judgment was that women could abort unwanted fetuses as the
word person used in the Fourteenth Amendment, does not include the unborn. The supreme court of United States
has upheld the decision in some other recent judgments [25] too.

Nearly all abortions take place in the first trimester, when a fetus cannot exist independent of the mother. As it is
attached by the placenta and umbilical cord, its health is dependent on her health. Thus, a fetus cannot be regarded
as a separate entity as it cannot exist outside her womb.

Although science at that time was unclear as to when "viability" began, the Court [26] set standards based on
"present medical knowledge" of the trimester progress of the pregnancy and declared that viability was reached only
after the first trimester. Within the first trimester, no state interference was permissible; any decision to abort the
pregnancy was left to the mother and her physician. In the second trimester, the state may begin to assert
regulations, but only if reasonably related to the mother's physical well-being. Even into the third trimester when the
state interest becomes compelling, any regulations must contain an exception "to preserve the life or health of the
mother." [27]

This law essay is an example of a student's work

Disclaimer
This essay has been submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies. This is not an example of the
work written by our professional law writers.

Law Essay Writing ServiceLaw Assignment Writing ServiceLaw Coursework Writing Service

Who wrote this essay?Freelance Writing JobsPlace an Order

B) Violation Of Right To Liberty Of Mother

Elective abortion was legalized by the Canadian Supreme Court in its landmark judgment on 1988 [28] . In this case,
the Court determined that the national law banning abortion was unconstitutional in its entirety. Interestingly, the
court relied--in part--on the fundamental nature of conscience to liberty when rendering its decision:

The right to liberty . . . guarantees a degree of personal autonomy over important decisions intimately affecting
their private livesin a free and democratic society, the conscience of the individual must be paramount to that of
the state" [29]

The Canadian Court drew an internal connection between abortion rights and liberty of mother.

C) Right To Privacy
The right to privacy of a woman implies some duties to the government for non interference in her private or
personal matters, which includes the right to make decisions for her own child's future. [30]
In Eisenstadt v. Baird [31] , Justice Brennan, for the court, pointed out the privacy in a way that, If the right of
privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual, married or not, to be in free from government intrusion into
matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child" [32]

The U.S has introduced The Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) which declares the policy [33] of the United States that
every woman has the fundamental right to choose to bear a child, to terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal viability,
or to terminate a pregnancy after fetal viability when necessary to protect the life or health of the woman."The Act
further says that the government is prohibited to interfere in her right to choose pregnancy.

The ultimate goal of the Act was to remove the substantive obstacles against the right to privacy and liberty of the
women. The U.S Supreme Court in Roe held that right to privacy extends to a woman's decision to have an abortion.
So, the abolition of abortion is violation of right to privacy of women.

D) Right To Dignity And Health

In the case of rape or incest, a woman is forced to carry pregnancy as a result of such a violent act, which would
cause further psychological harm and clear violation of her right to dignity and right to health. Often a woman is too
afraid to speak up or is unaware she is pregnant, thus the morning after pill is ineffective in these situations. It will
violate her right to dignity if government prohibits abortion

If abortion is banned, or just more restricted, we would return to the days of 'back-street abortions'. That is the
woman will be forced to resort the unhygienic and wild non-medical practices. These procedures obviously cause
risks to womens health.

The ability of a woman to have control of her body is critical to civil rights. Take away her reproductive choice is an
utter violation of her right to life.

Former American President Thomas Jefferson once explained, "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance" He also
warned, "It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of
others." [34] As this Note demonstrates, even in constitutional democracies that have provided their people with
broad, enumerated individual liberties, the threat of erosion of rights is ever-present. No rights, even those that seem
most fundamental are immune. They must be avidly protected and defended. [35]

Each woman has bodily sovereignty, which is she has the duly qualified right to decide matters regarding her body.
No one should intrude in her affairs against her will. The right to choose pregnancy is only up to that woman and the
government and others only have a duty to take care her rights.

CHAPTER 3
I. SUGGESTIONS
Abortion may be classified into three broad categories depending upon the nature and circumstances under which it
occurs. Like,

Natural abortion- Natural abortions is a very common phenomena and that may occur due to many reasons, such as
bad health, defect in generative organs of the mother, shock, fear, joy, etc.

Accidental abortion- Accidental abortion very often takes place because of pathological reasons where pregnancy
cannot be completed and the uterus empties before the maturity of fetus
 Artificial or induced abortion - Induced abortions is denied in law as an untimely delivery voluntarily procured with
intent to destroy the fetus. It is the most controversial kind of abortion. In these abortions, a physical attack on the
fetus is normally required. It is not a just failure to aid the fetus.

This law essay is an example of a student's work

Disclaimer
This essay has been submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies. This is not an example of the
work written by our professional law writers.

Law Essay Writing ServiceLaw Assignment Writing ServiceLaw Coursework Writing Service

Who wrote this essay?Freelance Writing JobsPlace an Order

Abortions falling under the first two categories should not be punishable. This doctrine is followed by almost all of
the states. The disagreement is regarding the third class of abortion.

Judith Jarvis Thomson, in her well known paper A defense of abortion analyzed the controversy. According to her,
if the fetus threatens its mother with death; two persons are involved, one whose life is threatened and one who
threatens it. Both of them are innocent. One who is threatened is not threatened because of any fault. Similarly, the
one who threatens does not threaten because of any fault. So the bystanders have no role in this issue, but the person
threatened only can. That is, a woman surely can defend her life against the threat posed by the unborn child, even if
doing so involves its death. [36]

While replying the pro-lifers argument that fetus have the same right to life as that of his/her mother, she contended
that right to life means right not to be killed unjustly. Thus abortions for just reasons [37] do not violate the right to
life. [38]

John Rawls critically analyzed the abortion right and equal status of women in the political systems and held that
any reasonable balance of [the values of due respect for human life, ordered reproduction of political society over
time, and the equality of women as equal citizens] will give a woman a duly qualified right to decide whether or not
to end her pregnancy during the first trimester. The reason for this is that at this early stage of pregnancy the
political value of the equality of women is overriding, and this right is required to give it substance and force [39]

Ronald Dworkin has been aware of this controversy and he made a detailed study on this issue. Dworkin has bore in
mind the issues, the right of fetus to live and the right of mother to choose. He did not accept the extreme position
taken by the derivative claimers of prohibition of abortion that, the fetus is a complete moral person from the
moment of conception. Hence the unborn has the right to live and abortion is a murder or nearly a wrong as murder.
Dworkin argued that everything that can be destroyed has an interest in not being destroyed.

Dworkin further argue that a fetus has no interest before the third trimester [40] .According to him; nothing can have
interest without having some form of consciousness. A fetus cannot feel pain until late in pregnancy, because its
brain is not sufficiently developed before then. The scientists have agreed that fetal brain will be sufficiently
developed to feel pain from approximately the twenty sixth week [41] .

Thus, whether abortion is against the interest of a fetus must depend on whether the fetus itself has interests, not on
whether interests will develop if no abortion takes place [42] . Something that is not alive does not have interests.
Also, just because something can develop into a person does not mean it has interests either. Once a fetus can live on
its own it may have interests. This is only after the third trimester. [43]
Dworkin, Rawls and Thomson are pointing out the same thing but in different words. The summary of their
arguments is, a woman has a constitutionally protected right to control the use of her own body. A decision to have
children is fundamental to womens physical, psychological and social health. They are in a way upholding the
decision in Roe.

The paper putting forward the suggestion that Artificial or induced abortion should be allowed in the first two
trimesters, because the fetus has not attained viability. Though the fetus attains sort of viability in the third semester,
it has some interests of its own. So, the abortion will amount to the violation of its rights. The abortions in these
periods should be regulated. Abortion in the last trimester should be punishable with some exceptions,

Abortion of pregnancies caused as a result of crimes like rape or incest

Abortion on the ground of health (physical and mental) condition of mother and health of fetus

Family planning

Abortion of pregnancies of minors

CHAPTER 4
I. Conclusion
Abolition of a woman's right to abortion, when and if she wants it, amounts to compulsory maternity: a form of
rape by the State."

Edward Abbey [44]

Any law relating abolition of abortion is nothing but a clear violation of a woman. It violates womens rights to
health, right to dignity, right liberty, right to privacy and in general, her right to life. Abortion must be legally
permitted in order to protect these most basic rights of women. Unless making such provisions, it will be a heinous
crime against a woman, as like rape, by the government.

Reproductive choice, as a general rule, should not be subject to government regulation. The decisions of whether,
when, how, and with whom to bear or begat a child are personal choices made well within the protected zone of
privacy doctrine. Therefore, the fundamental right of reproductive choice must be free of unwanted governmental
intrusion except in very limited circumstances where there is an unreasonable risk to maternal heath, fetal viability,
or both.

The paper came into a conclusion that, a fetus does not get a position of legal person till it has some interests of its
own. The government has no obligation to preserve all human life despite their viability. The woman has ultimate
autonomy to decide her reproductive rights and government should not impede her rights.

Chapter 3
Research Methodology

3.1 Overview of the Chapter

 This study was conducted in order to assess the challenges post by the new
accounting rules and practices in HK with regards to real estate industry. To be able to
gather the necessary data, the researcher utilized the descriptive method, using both
qualitative and quantitative approaches. Herein, the chosen responded were randomly
selected from various real estate industry in HK. The survey methods were the research
instruments used for the data-gathering.
The employees of real estate who have been chosen in this study accomplished
a survey questionnaire to evaluate the challenges facing the real estate industry in
Hong Kong. The results of the survey were then processed by computing the weighted
mean of each survey item. The computed values were compared to the Likert scale for
data interpretation. Relevant literatures were also used to support the gathered findings.
The credibility of findings and conclusions extensively depend on the quality of
the research design, data collection, data management, and data analysis. This
chapter will be dedicated to the description of the methods and procedures done in
order to obtain the data, how they will be analysed, interpreted, and how the conclusion
will be met. This section is to justify the means in which the study was obtained and will
help in giving it purpose and strength as it will then be truthful and analytical. All these
will help in the processing of the data and the formulation of conclusions.
Specifically, this research will cover the following: the research design and
method, the respondents or subjects to be studied (which will include the sampling
method), the data collection instrument, and the data analysis. These will be presented
below.

3.2 Research Methods

This study utilized the descriptive method of research. As widely accepted, the
descriptive method of research is a fact-finding study that involves adequate and
accurate interpretation of findings. Descriptive research describes a certain present
condition. Relatively, the method is appropriate to this study since it aims to describe
the present condition of technical analysis as it is used in the stock market. The
technique that was used under descriptive method is the normative survey approach
and evaluation, which is commonly used to explore opinions according to respondents
that can represent a whole population. The survey is appropriate in this study because it
enables the researcher in formulation of generalizations. Specifically, two types of
direct-data survey are included in this study. These are questionnaire survey and
interviews. Interviews with researchers, venture capital practitioners, and other
colleagues in the academy were conducted to provide further insight about the results of
the survey. The direct-data type of survey is a reliable source of first-hand information
because the researcher directly interacts with the participants. The questionnaire survey
respondents were given ample time to assess the challenges facing the real estate in
HK. Their own experiences with real estate in practice are necessary in identifying its
strengths and limitations.
The purpose of employing the descriptive method is to describe the nature of a
condition, as it takes place during the time of the study and to explore the cause or
causes of a particular condition. The researcher opted to use this kind of research
considering the desire to acquire first hand data from the respondents so as to
formulate rational and sound conclusions and recommendations for the study.
According to Creswell (1994), the descriptive method of research is to gather
information about the present existing condition. Since this study is focused on the
perception or evaluation of the consultancy firm's effective human resource
management, the descriptive method is the most appropriate method to use.
Two types of data were used: the primary and the secondary data. The primary
data were derived from the answers respondents gave in the self-administered
questionnaire prepared by the researcher. In addition, the information obtained from
the interview also provided primary research data that supported the study. The
secondary data on the other hand, were derived from the findings stated in published
documents and literatures related to the research problem. These were based from the
recent literatures related to real estate in HK and the factors that challenge it and the
accounting rules and practices in HK and the concepts cited by the respondents.
In terms of approach, the study employed both qualitative and quantitative
approaches. The quantitative approach focused on obtaining numerical findings was
used with the survey method. The interview on the other hand, made up the qualitative
approach of the study as this focused on personal accounts, observations, description
and individual insights of the respondents. This study employed the combined approach
so as to overcome the limitations of both approaches.

3.3 Direct-data Survey

 Direct-data survey aims on collecting pertinent data about technical analysis.
Accordingly, direct-data survey is used to reveal the status of some phenomenon within
an identified class of people, organisations, or regions at a particular time through
questionnaire and interview to directly collect information (Brubaker & Thomas, 2000).
The aim of the survey is to obtain pertinent data to achieve the research
objective. The site of the study was the prime real estate industries and accountants.
Representative samples were taken using a random sampling approach. In this
research study, the critical examination of the HK government's accounting policy
regarding was made. The responses, observation and approval of the respondents
towards these policies were gathered.
In this study, the chosen respondents will be selected from industries and other
people who are related to real estate and decision-making. Interview questions will focus on
the research problems and questions. The dissertation used self-administered questionnaire as
the main tool in collecting data from a large number of respondents.

3.4 Respondents of the Study

The study will have respondents directly from the chosen real estate industries in
HK. This may include managers, accountants and other knowledgeable employees. All
of these participants were selected through random sampling. This sampling method is
conducted where each member of a population has an equal opportunity to become
part of the sample. As all members of the population have an equal chance of becoming
a research participant, this is said to be the most efficient sampling procedure. In order
to conduct this sampling strategy, the researcher defined the population first, listed
down all the members of the population, and then selected members to make the
sample. For this purpose, a self-administered survey questionnaire in Likert format was
given to the respondents to answer.
Herein, there were 100 participants for the questionnaire survey and five individuals
for the interviews. The respondents were given 5 days to complete the survey
questionnaire upon request. After collecting the questionnaires, the responses will be
tallied, computed, analysed, and recorded.
One the other hand, for the personal interviews, most of the interviewees were
given time according to their convenience. Choices were given for the interviewees who
will answer the interview questions, through phone, email, online conversation, chat or
personal interview. There were only five participants who were willing and/or had the
chance to share their time and talk about their experience in real estate.

3.5 Instrumentation
1. Content analysis
Content analysis was done to analyse communications in order to answer two
levels of questions the descriptive and the interpretive. Descriptive questions focused
on what the communication contains. Interpretative questions focused on what the
contents was likely to mean. The process entailed searching through one or more
communication to answer questions that an investigator brings to the search (Brubaker
& Thomas, 2000). Content Analysis was used to analyze and interpret the interviews.

2. Statistical Treatment
The Likert scale was used to interpret items in the questionnaire. These
responses were based on the respondents' assesHK Real Estatent of the current
investment process model. There were instances that the respondents were asked to
rate the effectiveness of implementing the phases in the investment process. The range
and interpretation of the five-point scale are shown in Table 2.

Table 2
The Five-point Likert Scale

Scale Range Interpretation

5 4.01 5.00 Strongly Agree

4 3.01 4.00 Agree

3 2.01 3.00 Uncertain

2 1.01 2.00 Disagree

1 0.01 1.00 Strongly Disagree

 Weighted mean was used to measure the general response of the survey
samples, whether they agree to a given statement or not.
The formula in computing weighted mean is as follows:
Where: f weight given to each response
x number of responses
xt total number of responses
The survey result was analysed with the use of statistical approach and Microsoft Excel
spreadsheets.

3.6 Ethical Considerations

As this study utilized human participants and investigated on real estate and
accounting rules and practices in HK, certain issues were addressed. The consideration
of these issues is necessary for the purpose of ensuring the privacy as well as the
security of the participants. These issues were identified in advance so as prevent
future problems that could have risen during the research process. Among the
significant issues that were considered included consent, confidentiality and data
protection.
In the conduct of the research, the survey forms and interview methods were
drafted in a very clear and concise manner to prevent conflicts among
respondents. People who participated in the research were given an ample time to
respond to the questions posed on them to avoid errors and inaccuracies in their
answers. The respondents were given a waiver regarding the confidentiality of their
identity and the information that they did not wish to disclose. The respondents'
cooperation was eagerly sought after, and they were assured that the data gathered
from them would be treated with the strictest confidence, so that they would be more
open. This was done with the hope that this would promote trust between the
researcher and the respondents.