CHAPTER-IV

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATIONS

TABLE 4.1

Age
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
27 24.5 24.5 24.5
Below-30

Valid 31-40 52 47.3 47.3 71.8

41-50 31 28.2 28.2 100.0
Total 110 100.0 100.0
CHART

INTERPRETATION:

From the table 1 24.5% of the employees come under the age group of below 30,
47.3% of the employees come under the age group of 31-40. 28.2% of the employees
come under the age group of 41-50.
TABLE 4.2
Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Male 54 49.1 49.1 49.1

Valid Female 56 50.9 50.9 100.0
Total 110 100.0 100.0
CHART

INTERPRETATION:
The above table 2 indicates that 49.1% of respondents are from male, 50.9% of
respondents are from female.
TABLE 4.3

Educational Qualification
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

SSLC 16 14.5 14.5 14.5

HSC 31 28.2 28.2 42.7
Graduate 33 30.0 30.0 72.7
Valid
Post 30 27.3 27.3 100.0
Graduated
Total 110 100.0 100.0
CHART

INTERPRETATION:
The above table 3 states that 14.5% of the respondents are SSLC and 28.2% of the
respondents are HSC, 30.0 of the respondent Graduate, 27.3 of the respondent Post
Graduate It can be inferred that most of the respondents are aware of the employee
welfare facilities provided at the company.
TABLE 4.4

Salary
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

24 21.8 21.8 21.8

20000-30000

32 29.1 29.1 50.9

30000-35000

Valid 29 26.4 26.4 77.3

35000-40000

25 22.7 22.7 100.0

Above 50000

Total 110 100.0 100.0

CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 4 it can observe that 21.8% of the respondents feel that the overall
welfare facilities provided by the organization are 20000-30000, 29.1% of
respondents think 30000-35000 about the overall satisfaction level about the welfare
facilities, 26.4% feel 35000-40000, 22.7% of them feel above 50000, it can be
inferred that the opinion of the respondents regarding the overall welfare facilities
are salary.
TABLE 4.5

Experience
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

16 14.5 14.5 14.5

2-3 year experience

39 35.5 35.5 50.0

3-4 year experience

Valid
35 31.8 31.8 81.8
4-5 years experience

above 5 years 20 18.2 18.2 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 5 it can observe that 14.5% of the respondents feel that the overall
welfare facilities provided by the organization are 2-3 years experience, 35.5% of
respondents think 3-8 years experience about the overall satisfaction level about the
welfare facilities, 31.8% feel 4-5 years experience, 18.2% of them feel above 5
years, it can be inferred that the opinion of the respondents regarding the overall
welfare facilities are Experience.
TABLE 4.6

Employee Welfare Facilities

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

yes 56 50.9 50.9 50.9

Valid no 54 49.1 49.1 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

CHART

INTERPRETATION:

The above table 6 states that 50.9% of the respondents are aware and 49.1% of the
respondents are unaware of the statutory and non statutory employee welfare
facilities provided at industry. It can be inferred that most of the respondents are
aware of the employee welfare facilities provided at the company.
TABLE 4.7
Medical facilities
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Excellent 11 10.0 10.0 10.0

19 17.3 17.3 27.3
Very Good

Good 33 30.0 30.0 57.3

Valid
18 16.4 16.4 73.6
Satisfactory

poor 29 26.4 26.4 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 7 it can observe that 26.4% of respondents feel that the medical and
First aid facilities are poor, while 30.0% of respondents feel medical and First aid
facilities are good and another 16.4% of the respondents convey as satisfactory,
17.3% of the respondents feel medical and first aid facilities are very good and
10.0% of respondents think medical and first aid facilities are excellent. It can be
inferred that medical and first aid facilities such as mini clinic, free medical checkup,
free first aid availability pills, tonic and tablets are poor.
TABLE 4.8

Canteen Facilities
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Excellent 18 16.4 16.4 16.4
19 17.3 17.3 33.6
Very Good

Good 29 26.4 26.4 60.0

Valid
23 20.9 20.9 80.9
Satisfactory

poor 21 19.1 19.1 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 8 it can observe that 26.4% of the respondents say that the canteen
facilities are good, 20.9% of respondents think canteen facilities are satisfactory,
17.3% say canteen facilities are very good whereas 16.4% say excellent and 19.1%
of respondents say canteen facilities are poor.
TABLE 4.9
Transport
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Excellent 17 15.5 15.5 15.5
Very Good 30 27.3 27.3 42.7

Good 23 20.9 20.9 63.6

Valid
Satisfactory 27 24.5 24.5 88.2

poor 13 11.8 11.8 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0
CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 9 it can observe that 20.9% of the respondents say that the Transport
and parking facilities are good, while 24.5% of them think Transport and parking
facilities is satisfactory and the 11.8% respondents say poor, whereas of the
27.3%respondents convey that the Transport and parking facilities are very good and
15.5% say parking facilities are excellent. It can be inferred that employees opinion
on parking facility of the company ranges from good to satisfactory.
TABLE 4.10
Uniform
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Excellent 22 20.0 20.0 20.0

22 20.0 20.0 40.0
Very Good

Good 30 27.3 27.3 67.3

Valid
20 18.2 18.2 85.5
Satisfactory

poor 16 14.5 14.5 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0
CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 10 it can observe that 18.2% of the respondents say that the Uniform
and safety shoe are satisfactory, while 14.5% of the respondents say uniform and
safety shoes are poor, whereas 20.0% think Uniform and safety shoes are very good
and another 27.3% of the respondents say good and 20.0% think Uniform and safety
shoes are excellent. It can be inferred that uniform and safety shoes provided by the
company to the employees are satisfactory.
TABLE 4.11

Restroom
Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative Percent
Percent
Excellent 33 30.0 30.0 30.0

Very Good 18 16.4 16.4 46.4

Good 28 25.5 25.5 71.8

Valid
Satisfactory 17 15.5 15.5 87.3

poor 14 12.7 12.7 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0
CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 11 it can observe that 12.7% of the respondents feel that the rest
rooms/ wash rooms are poor, while 15.5% think rest rooms are satisfactory whereas
25.5% of the respondents feel good about rest rooms, 16.4% convey rest rooms are
very good and 30.0% say rest rooms are excellent. It can be inferred that respondents
feel Rest rooms/ wash rooms/Recreational facilities provided by the company are
poor.
TABLE 4.12
Commitment
Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Percent Percent

Strongly Agree 18 16.4 16.4 16.4

Agree 30 27.3 27.3 43.6

Neutral 34 30.9 30.9 74.5
Valid
Disagree 17 15.5 15.5 90.0
11 10.0 10.0 100.0
Strongly disagree

Total 110 100.0 100.0

CHART

INTERPRETATION:
The table 12 depicts that 15.5% of the respondents are indecisive about the
commitment of the company in promoting employee welfare facilities, respondents
disagree with the organization is committed in promoting employee welfare
facilities, 27.3% of respondents agree towards welfare facilities and 10.0% of the
respondents disagree that the companys commitment in employee welfare facilities
and 16.4% of the respondents strongly agree that the companys commitment
towards employee welfare facilities. It can be inferred that the opinion of the
respondents is moderate regarding the commitment of the organization in the
promotion of employee welfare facilities.
TABLE 4.13

Employee Counselling
Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Percent Percent

Highly Satisfied 18 16.4 16.4 16.4

Satisfied 26 23.6 23.6 40.0

Neutral 22 20.0 20.0 60.0
Valid
Dissatisfied 31 28.2 28.2 88.2
Highly 13 11.8 11.8 100.0
Dissatisfied
Total 110 100.0 100.0
CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 13 it can observe that 20.0% of the respondents are Neutral about the
employee counseling, while 28.2% are dissatisfied about the counseling and 23.6%
of the respondents are satisfied whereas 11.8% of the respondents are highly
dissatisfied 16.4% of the respondents are highly satisfied with employee counseling.
It can be inferred that respondents have moderate opinion about the employee
counseling of the company.
TABLE 4.14

Attitude
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Excellent 19 17.3 17.3 17.3
Very Good 25 22.7 22.7 40.0

Good 24 21.8 21.8 61.8

Valid
Satisfactory 23 20.9 20.9 82.7

poor 19 17.3 17.3 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0
CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 14 it can observe that 21.8% of the respondents feel that the overall
welfare facilities provided by the organization are good, 22.7% of respondents think
very good about the overall satisfaction level about the welfare facilities, 17.3% feel
excellent, 20.9% of them feel satisfied, whereas 19% say they have poor satisfaction
towards facilities, it can be inferred that the opinion of the respondents regarding the
overall welfare facilities are good.
TABLE 4.15
Safety Facilities
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Strongly Agree 15 13.6 13.6 13.6
Agree 31 28.2 28.2 41.8
Neutral 39 35.5 35.5 77.3
Valid
Disagree 18 16.4 16.4 93.6
Strongly disagree 7 6.4 6.4 100.0
Total 110 100.0 100.0
CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 15 it can observe that 35.5% of the respondents are indecisive about
the safety facilities, 28.2% of them agree with the adoption of safety facilities
whereas 16.4% of the respondents disagree, whereas 13.6% of the respondents
strongly agree and 6.4% of respondents strongly disagree about safety facilities and
standard adopted by the Company. From the above analysis it can be said that the
opinion of the respondents is moderate about the safety facilities of the company.
TABLE 4.16
Safety Equipments
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

yes 56 50.9 50.9 50.9

Valid no 54 49.1 49.1 100.0
Total 110 100.0 100.0
CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table-16 it can observe that 50.9% of the respondents feel they are provided
with the safety equipments during work, while 49.1% do not feel that the safety
equipments are provided. It can be inferred that the company provides safety
equipments to its employees during work.
TABLE 4.17

Condition
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Excellent 12 10.9 10.9 10.9

Very Good 27 24.5 24.5 35.5

Good 29 26.4 26.4 61.8

Valid
Satisfactory 30 27.3 27.3 89.1

poor 12 10.9 10.9 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0
CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 17 it can observe that 26.4% of the respondents say that the working
conditions are good, while 24.5% think working conditions are very good, whereas
27.3% feel Satisfactory about the working conditions, 10.9% feel poor and 10.9%
think excellent about the working conditions respectively.
TABLE 4.18

Drinking Water

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

yes 55 50.0 50.0 50.0

Valid no 55 50.0 50.0 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 18 it can observe that 50.0% of the respondents agree that the
company provides sufficient drinking water and 50.0% do not agree towards
company providing sufficient drinking water. It can be inferred that the company
provides sufficient drinking water its employees.
TABLE 4.19

Present job
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent

Strongly Agree 14 12.7 12.7 12.7

Agree 18 16.4 16.4 29.1

Neutral 22 20.0 20.0 49.1
Valid
Disagree 32 29.1 29.1 78.2
24 21.8 21.8 100.0
Strongly disagree

Total 110 100.0 100.0

CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 19 it can observe that 20.0% of the respondents are neutral indecisive
about the safety facilities, 16.4% of them agree with the adoption of safety facilities
whereas 29.1% of the respondents disagree, whereas 12.7% of the respondents
strongly agree and 21.8% of respondents strongly disagree about safety facilities and
standard adopted by the Company. From the above analysis it can be said that the
opinion of the respondents is moderate about the safety facilities of the company.
TABLE 4.20
My job
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

14 12.7 12.7 12.7

Strongly Agree

Agree 31 28.2 28.2 40.9

Neutral 35 31.8 31.8 72.7
Valid
Disagree 19 17.3 17.3 90.0
11 10.0 10.0 100.0
Strongly disagree

Total 110 100.0 100.0

CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 20 it can observe that 31.8% of the respondents are neutral indecisive
about the safety facilities, 28.2% of them agree with the adoption of safety facilities
whereas 17.3% of the respondents disagree, whereas 12.7% of the respondents
strongly agree and 10.0% of respondents strongly disagree about safety facilities and
standard adopted by the Company. From the above analysis it can be said that the
opinion of the respondents is moderate about the safety facilities of the company.
TABLE 4.21

Personal job
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

21 19.1 19.1 19.1

Strongly Agree

Agree 21 19.1 19.1 38.2

Neutral 24 21.8 21.8 60.0
Valid
Disagree 21 19.1 19.1 79.1
23 20.9 20.9 100.0
Strongly disagree

Total 110 100.0 100.0

CHART

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 21 it can observe that 21.8% of the respondents are indecisive about
the safety facilities, 19.1% of them agree with the adoption of safety facilities
whereas 19.1% of the respondents disagree, whereas 19.1% of the respondents
strongly agree and 20.9% of respondents strongly disagree about safety facilities and
standard adopted by the Company. From the above analysis it can be said that the
opinion of the respondents is moderate about the safety facilities of the company.