Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English 102 Portfolio Submitted by Tessa Mccann Presented To L. Hemmings Spring Quarter 2015 New England Institute of Technology
English 102 Portfolio Submitted by Tessa Mccann Presented To L. Hemmings Spring Quarter 2015 New England Institute of Technology
English 102 Portfolio Submitted by Tessa Mccann Presented To L. Hemmings Spring Quarter 2015 New England Institute of Technology
INTRODUCTION
The city of Boston has recently been chosen as a potential host for the 2024 Olympic Games.
The Olympic Games are an ancient event, originating almost three thousand years ago in Greece. The
first modern Olympic Games was held in Athen in 1896 (The Olympic Games 2010) and since then the
games have expanded and become revered as the most prestigious sporting event in the world.
Boston should not be chosen to host the Summer 2024 Olympic Games, because it will hurt the
economy by causing a decrease in tourism and in hotel occupancy. Another reason that hosting the
Olympics could be devastating to Boston is because the cost of hosting would leave Boston taxpayers
on the hook for paying the bill. And lastly, the amount of revenue that would be acquired during the
games would be nothing compared to the cost of hosting the games, building and sustaining the venues,
MOTIVATION
Being from Boston, I have a personal interest in this topic. I have never been the biggest fan of
the Olympic Games, but with a brother living in Boston and the rest of my family living in
Massachusetts, the last thing I want is for them to be paying for the Olympic games for another thirty
years. I have a passion for the city of Boston, its rich history, beautiful landmarks, and how so much of
the architecture points to its colonial history. It would truly be a tragedy for the city to fall into
METHODOLOGY
The methodology I used was a variety of websites, from online articles to the official website of
EXPERT OPINIONS
Context. Why Oppose Boston 2024 is an article that talks about the realities behind hosting
the Olympics and what it would really do to the people of Boston. They back up their information with
references to researchers and facts from cities that have hosted the Olympics in the past.
Economics. The Olympics is said to improve a cites economy, but according to this article, there
doesn't seem to be a lot of evidence to support that idea. Studies have shown that the opposite tends to
happen. In London and Beijing, the number of visitors actually decreased during the Olympics. Many
people who are for Boston hosting the Olympics say that it will cause Bostons hotels to take in more
business resulting in economic growth. The reality is that Bostons hotels, during the summer, tend to be
at 90% capacity. This article suggests that hosting the Olympics will actually result in a decrease in
hotel business, because many people will likely be trying to avoid the city during the months of the
Olympics.
Price. Hosting the Olympics, on average, costs 15 billion dollars, which is nearly four times the
amount Boston plans to spend on the Olympics. According to this article, that is more than the annual
income taxes that are collected by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The International Olympic
Committee requires a guarantee that the host city will be able to pay the costs of hosting the Olympics,
when the budget untimely goes over the initial estimate it leaves the taxes payers responsible for paying
the rest.
Unimportant. This article stressed an idea that many other articles don't emphasize. The article
pointed out that there are many issues in Boston which need to be resolved, such as, improving the
school system and lowering the cost of health insurance. These are issues that are vital to Boston as a
city, but will be over shadowed if Boston wins the bid and becomes the hosting city for the 2024
Olympics.
Boston Olympics 4
The Author. Why Oppose Boston 2024, is an article that was written by an organization called
NoBostonOlympics, which was created by Chris Dempsey, Kelley Gossett, and Liam Kerr. No
Boston Olympics is registered with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. According to Adam Vaccaro,
author of an article that covered No Boston Olympics, the three creators are politically polished, with
backgrounds similar to many of those working with the Olympic organization committee Boston
2024.
Economics. If the idea of massive debt, living in a police state, and turning Boston into the
planets largest graveyard of used rubbers sounds like paradise, then by all means, cross your fingers
that Boston will bring the 2024 Olympic Summer Games to town. If, however, you like your city pretty
much the way it is, then you may want to think twice about wanting to host the worlds biggest party
and construction project. (Vogel 2013). Its a very grim idea, but Vogel's quote does give an idea of
how drastically the consequences of hosting the Olympics might be. The article uses examples from
past Olympic hosts to illustrate the average cost of hosting. London spent 20 billion, Athens owed 16
billion, and Beijing topped it off at 40 billion. All that money gets spent on building venues, new
housing, and repairing roads, but on average only about 6 billion is made in revenues.
Displacement. An aspect of hosting the Olympics that isn't usually publicized is stressed in this article.
Each time the Olympic Games come to a city, thousands of homeless are moved or displaced. In
Beijing, 1.5 million people were relocated. Seoul moved 200,000 people and Atlanta moved 30,000.
While the Olympics were being held in Atlanta, over 2,000 public housing units were destroyed, and
homelessness was actually criminalized. In the hopes that the city could look more appealing to the
world.
Author. Chris Vogel, who is the author of this article is an award winning investigative journalist. He is
the winner of the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism and the James Aronson Award for Social
Justice. He attended graduate school in Dublin, Ireland and taught magazine writing at UCLA.Vogel
Boston Olympics 5
has written articles about many sensitive topics from murders to drug wars, kidnappings, and
environmental crimes. Although the Olympic Games are not as sensitive as those topics, it shows that
Economy. The promise that no public money will be spent on the Boston Olympics is
unrealistic according to Zimbalist's article. Ideally this is how the cost is suppose to be spread out. The
cost of operating the games is to be paid for by revenues, construction costs are to be covered by
private funds, and the federal government is expected to pay 100% of the security costs. However,
Zimalist presents a few very important questions for his readers to ponder on. Firstly, Why would a
US company build an Olympic stadium that will be torn down? and secondly, Why has no company
stepped forward and declared its intention even to explore this opportunity?.
Expectations. It is rare that the economical predictions before the Olympics are accurate to the reality
after the games are over. For instance, Boston intends to build a temporary stadium that seats 60,000
people and plan to make 1.15 billion dollars in ticket sales. In London, a stadium that seated 80,000
people was built and only 990 million dollars was made in ticket sales. As the titles suggest, the
numbers don't add up. Another famous Olympic assumption is that the Games will bring more tourism
to the host city, but according to Zimbalist that is not the reality. In the summer of 2012, London saw a
8% decrease in the amount of tourists compared to the year before. Beijing saw even more devastating
results, tourism decreased by 20% after the Olympic Games. These numbers do not show much
Author. Andrew Zimbalist received a B.A. from the University of Wisconsin and a Ph.D. from
Harvard University. He has been a professor of economics at Smith College since 1974. He is a known
consultant for the sporting world and has published 22 books, including Circus Maximus: The
CONCLUSION
Boston Olympics 6
Boston should not host the Olympics in 2024 because it will not provide economical growth or
new jobs. And regardless of what promises the Olympic committees might say, it will cost the people
The potential for Boston, my home, to be the host of the Olympics is a enticing thought, but it
will cause more harm than good. According to Andrew Zimbalist's article, both London and Beijing
saw a decrease in the amount of tourism after the Olympic Games. London saw an eight percent
decrease, while Beijing saw a staggering twenty percent decrease in tourism. Boston intends on making
huge benefits from the Olympics, but the numbers simply don't add up. For the London Olympics, a
stadium with the capacity to seat eighty thousand spectators. That stadium took in nine hundred and
ninety million dollars in ticket sales. Boston has plans to build a stadium with the capacity to seat sixty
thousand people and intends to make over one billion dollars in ticket sales.
In 2009, the Associated Press produced an article that stated many facts from past Olympics that
make hosting the Olympics a less than appealing idea. After researching and reading many articles, its
becoming overwhelmingly clear that the Olympic predictions, regarding the benefits for the hosting
city, are rarely accurate. In 1996, Atlanta was intending to make roughly five billion dollars from the
Olympic Games, but they evidently made twenty percent less than what was predicted. That same city
was expecting the games to create seventy seven thousand jobs, but the games only created about half
of the initial estimate. Lastly, I don't think many people realize how devastating the Olympics can be.
The Olympics only last for a short time, but in reality the games last much longer for the hosting city.
The city of Montreal, which hosted the Olympics in 1976, didn't fully pay off the debt made by the
games until 2006, thirty years after the games took place.
As stated in many articles, the Olympics seemed to have a negative effect on the latest summer
Olympic hosts, London and Beijing. Another reason the Olympics are supposedly economically
beneficial for the hosting city is that it is expected to bring occupy the cities hotels and inns. However,
Boston Olympics 7
some articles have predicted that Boston hotels will see a decrease in occupancy. According to
Vaccaro's article, Bostons hotels are usually at ninety percent capacity during the summer months.
Lastly with the past Olympics as evidence, we can say that hosting the Olympics costs, on average,
fifteen billion dollars. Boston claims its budget is going to be four billion dollars. How does Boston
intend on spending only four billion dollars, when the average cost is four times the initial budget?
In my opinion, I do not think Boston should host the Olympics in 2024 because I believe it
would inflict long lasting damage on the city ad its economy. When I first heard that Boston might be
considered to host the Olympics, I was ecstatic. Yet after I began to research the topic, I came to realize
how devastating the Olympic Games can be on the hosting city. The last thing I want is for Boston to
REFERENCES
1. Boston 2024 Olympics: Be Careful What You Wish For. (2013, March 7). Retrieved May 20, 2015,
from http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2013/03/07/boston-2024-olympics/
2. Vaccaro, A. (n.d.). How No Boston Olympics Has Steered the 2024 Bid Debate. Retrieved May 18,
olympics/f9MFnZxsY8WOx4Hbw68gpM/story.html?p1=feature_pri_hp
http://www.nobostonolympics.org/why_oppose_the_games
4. Zimbalist, A. (n.d.). Olympics numbers dont add up - The Boston Globe. Retrieved May 19, 2015,
from http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2015/03/20/olympics-numbers-don-
add/BqrAaenp4tKK3Q7ASU5OrJ/story.html