Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Βραχνός, Μοντέλα Εκθετικών Γραφημάτων PDF
Βραχνός, Μοντέλα Εκθετικών Γραφημάτων PDF
Βραχνός, Μοντέλα Εκθετικών Γραφημάτων PDF
TMHMA MAJHMATIKWN
DIPLWMATIKH ERGASIA
P P
D M
ROSARMOGH, ROSOMOIWSH
E T
KAI IAGNWSH ONTELWN
G
KJETIKWN UQAIWN
RAFHMATWN
QRHSTOS I. BRAQNOS
Epiblpwn
MWUSHS A. MPOUNTOURIDHS
Anaplhrwt Kajhght
'Ena ek bajwn euqarist sthn oikognei mou kai pio sugkekrimna stou
gone
mou, Eustrata kai Iwnnh, pou qwr
auto
, me apl kai lit lgia, de
ja briskmoun sthn euqristh jsh na sa
parajtw tra aut
ti
lxei
.
Ousiastik, epiplon, uprxe kai h bojeia th
uploiph
oikogneia
mou,
pou me endiafron agkliasan kti pou pragmatik agapw: ta Majhmatik.
2 To Dktuo Florentine 31
2.1 Exerenhsh Diktou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.2 Prosarmog Montlou Ekjetiko Tuqaou
Grafmato
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
2.3 Statistik
Diktou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
2.4 Prosomowsh Diktou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
2.5 Prosarmog Montlou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.6 Ekfulism
kai Diagnwstik . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
3 To Dktuo FMH 43
3.1 Exerenhsh Diktou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
3.2 Prosarmog Montlou Ekjetiko Tuqaou
Grafmato
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
3.3 Anagnrish Ekfulismo tou Montlou . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
3.4 Mh Ekfulismna Montla Duadik
Exrthsh
. . . . . . . . 58
i
3.5 Poithta Prosarmog
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
5 Parrthma 81
5.1 To Peribllon R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
5.1.1 Genik Parousash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
5.1.2 Pakta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
5.1.3 Diansmata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Bibliografa 86
ii
Katlogo
Sqhmtwn
1.1 Sqhmatismo kai parmetroi gia ta montla tuqawn grafhm-
twn Markov. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.2 (A-H) Sqhmatismo gia na montlo qarakthristikn Markov
montlo koinwnik
epilog
grafmato
Markov. . . . . . 17
1.3 2-, 3- kai 4-trgwna. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
1.4 2-, 3- kai 4-anexrthte
2-diadrom
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
1.5 Kateujunmena 2-, 3- kai 4-trgwna. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.1 To dktuo Flomarriage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
2.2 H prosomowsh tou prosarmosmnou diktou Flomarriage. . . 39
2.3 Dignwsh poithta
prosarmog
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
3.1 To dktuo FMH qwr
ti
memonwmne
koruf
. . . . . . . . . 45
3.2 To dktuo FMH me ti
memonwmne
koruf
. . . . . . . . . . . 46
3.3 To dktuo FMH (qwr
ti
memonwmne
koruf
) me ti
koru-
f
qrwmatismne
anloga th
bajmologa
twn majhtn. . . 47
3.4 Sgkrish katanom
bajmn metax twn diktuakn dedomnwn
FMH kai tou deterou montlou (model 2). . . . . . . . . . . 54
3.5 Diagnwstik MCMC tou trtou montlou. . . . . . . . . . . . 56
3.6 Sgkrish montlwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
3.7 Sgkrish trignwn se 100 prosomoisei
tou montlou 4 (i-
stgramma) kai twn arqikn dedomnwn (kkkino blo
). . . . 63
3.8 Poithta prosarmog
gia bajmo
tou montlou 4. . . . . . . 64
3.9 Poithta prosarmog
tou montlou 4 gia thn katanom twn
akmiak diamoirasmnwn etarwn kai thn katanom th
gewdai-
tik
apstash
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
4.1 To dktuo IPRED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
4.2 To dktuo IPRED qrwmatismno anloga me to qarakthristik
tou tpou twn drntwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
4.3 To dktuo IPRED qrwmatismno anloga me to qarakthristik
twn topojetsewn twn drntwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
4.4 To dktuo SWPAT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
4.5 To dktuo SWPAT qrwmatismno anloga me to qarakthristi-
k tou tpou twn drntwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4.6 To dktuo SWPAT qrwmatismno anloga me to qarakthristi-
k twn topojetsewn twn drntwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
iii
1
Eisagwg
H parosa diplwmatik ergasa brsketai ston eurtero qro th
majhmati-
k
statistik
jewra
twn grafhmtwn. Krio
stqo
ma
, pw
anaf-
rei kai o ttlo
, enai h montelopohsh grafhmtwn, me aptero skop thn
prosarmog, prosomowsh kai dignwsh autn msw montlwn ekjetikn tu-
qawn grafhmtwn.
1. To dktuo Florentine.
Tlo
, sto parrthma th
ergasa
dnoume mia sntomh eisagwg sto peribl-
lon R kai se kpoie
genik
entol
auto.
1 MONT
ELA EKJETIK
WN TUQA
IWN GRAFHM
ATWN MARKOV 3
Bma Detero: H upjesh exrthsh kai h tuqaa sunfeia metax twn di-
ktuakn metablhtn
riorismn
pou (i) to jroisma enai pnw se lou
tou
sqhmatismo
A, (ii) A enai
h parmetro
, pou antistoiqe sto sqhmatism A (kai enai mh mhdenik mno
en la ta zeugria twn metablhtn sto A upoteje ti enai up sunjkh
1
exarthmna ), (iii) gA (y) =
yij A yij enai h diktuak statistik, pou anti-
Q
Epomnw
, h upjesh exrthsh
enai krsimh gia ton periorism twn pijann
sqhmatismn sto montlo. Ja dsoume kpoia sugkekrimna paradegmata
paraktw. 'Ena
sqhmatism
A anafretai se na uposnolo metablhtn,
pou apotelontai ap desmo
, kai antistoiqe se mia mikr diktuak upodom.
Gia pardeigma, en se na kateujunmeno dktuo efarmsoume thn upjesh
duadik
exrthsh
, petai ti oi parmetroi amoibaithta
ja sumperilhfjon
sto montlo. Se autn thn perptwsh, na
sqhmatism
sto montlo enai
to snolo twn metablhtn {Y12 , Y21 }, na
llo
enai to snolo {Y13 , Y31 }
k.o.k., me kje duda na ddei to dik th
sqhmatism. Profan
, gia kje
nan ap auto
tou
sqhmatismo
, en kai oi duo desmo enai parnte
sto
parathromeno grfhma, blpoume nan amoibao (antapodidmeno) desm kai,
gia aut, o sqhmatism
anaparist na tpo diktuak
upodom
, pou mpore
na parathrhje sto grfhma y. Mporome na skeftome autn to sqhmatism
diagrammatik san thn dia thn upodom, dhlad, ton amoibao (antapodidme-
no) desm.
All uprqoun arketo lloi trpoi, me tou
opoou
oi periorismo sti
pa-
ramtrou
mporon na eisaqjon kai, tsi, diaforetiko periorismo isqoun
se diaforetik montla. Smfwna me mia llh mjodo efarmog
periorismn,
exissoume ti
paramtrou
gia isomorfiko
sqhmatismo
tan emplkon-
tai moioi tpoi drntwn. Gia pardeigma, sthn perptwsh th
amoibaithta
sta sqolik dktua fila
, ja mporosame na protenoume llh parmetro a-
moibaithta
gia sqhmatismo
dudwn th
morf
kortsi-kortsi, llh gia
sqhmatismo
agri-kortsi kai llh gia sqhmatismo
agri-agri.
Parathrome ti, sugkrnonta
me thn exswsh (1), kje snolo A, pou peri-
lambnei mia mno pijan akm Yij , enai na
sqhmatism
auto tou montlou
kai uprqei h parmetro
ij gia kje nan ttoio sqhmatism. H diktuak
statistik gA (y) = gij (y) = yij ma
lei en aut
o sqhmatism
parath-
retai qi. En epiblloume thn upjesh th
omoiogneia
, tsi ste kje
desm
na sumperifretai me ton dio trpo, exisnoume ti
paramtrou
ste
ij = , gia la ta i kai j , kai, ra:
!
1
Pr(Y = y) = exp(L(y)) (2)
pou L(y) = i,j yi,j enai o arijm
twn txwn sto grfhma y kai h parme-
P
pou L11 (y) enai o arijm
twn txwn msa sto prto mplok kai L12 (y) o
arijm
twn txwn ap to mplok 1 sto mplok 2 k.o.k.
Mia elafr
pio perplokh (all qi suqn pol realistik) upjesh gia
kateujunmena grafmata enai ti oi dude
, ant twn akmn, enai anexrth-
te
h ma ap thn llh. Me autn thn upjesh exrthsh
, qoume duo tpou
sqhmatismn sto montlo, apl
akm
kai amoibae
(antapodidmene
) akm
.
Afo epiblloume thn omoiogneia, to montlo gnetai:
! !
1 X X
Pr(Y = y) = exp yij + yij yji
i,j i,j
!
1
= exp(L(y) + M (y)) (3)
pou L(y) enai o arijm
twn desmn sto y kai M (y) = i,j yij yji enai o
P
Metax kpoiwn llwn sqetikn, all pio polplokwn kai realistikn mont-
lwn, enai to montlo p2 (Lazega & van Duijn, 1997 [17], van Duijn et al.,
2004 [41]), pou upotjetai ti qoume duadik anexarthsa all kai exrthsh
ap ta qarakthristik twn kmbwn (drntwn). To montlo p2 enai katllhlo,
se periptsei
pou perimnoume th dom na diamorfwje ap ta qarakthristi-
k. Enai mia proktash tou montlou p1 me ti
epidrsei
tou apostola kai
tou paralpth na antimetwpzontai san tuqae
epidrsei
, sumperilambano-
mnwn kai twn epidrsewn twn drntwn kai twn dudwn drntwn. 'Oso pio
polploke
upojsei
sthrzoun aut to montlo, tso pio realistik aut
gnetai gia pragmatik diktuak dedomna, eidik tan oi epidrsei
twn qa-
rakthristikn anamnontai na enai isqur
. Diafrei ap ta snhjh montla
ekjetikn tuqawn grafhmtwn w
pro
thn enswmtwsh twn tuqawn epi-
drsewn. Bebaw
, sthn perptwsh twn mh kateujunmenwn grafhmtwn, ta
montla Bernoulli kai ta montla duadik
exrthsh
enai tautshma: gia mh
kateujunmena grafmata, h parmetro
amoibaithta
p sthn exswsh (3)
den pazei kanna rlo kai to montlo angetai sthn exswsh (2).
!
1
Pr(Y = y) = exp L(y) + 2 S2 (y) + 3 S3 (y) + T (y) (4)
pou S2 (y) kai S3 (y) enai oi arijmo twn 2-asterin kai twn 3-asterin,
antstoiqa, msa sto dktuo y kai T (y) enai o arijm
twn trignwn sto
y. Parathrome ti, gia tuqaa grafmata Markov, enai epsh
pijan na
1 MONT
ELA EKJETIK
WN TUQA
IWN GRAFHM
ATWN MARKOV 16
Mia apl upjesh exrthsh
anmesa sta qarakthristik kai sti
diktuak
metablht
enai tan to qarakthristik tou i ephrezei pijano
desmo
,
pou sundoun to i (dhlad, Yij ), kai anafermaste se autn thn upjesh
w
upjesh twn qarakthristikn Markov. Gia pardeigma, se na organw-
tik plasio, h arqaithta en
drnto
(p.q., arqaithta sti
dieujuntik
ikanthte
) mpore na ephresei tou
pijano
desmo
auto tou drnto
.
An jewrsoume qarakthristik Markov maz me diktuak
exartsei
Marko-
v, gia na mh kateujunmeno grfhma, to montlo perilambnei tou
sqhma-
tismo
(mqri 3-astria), pou fanontai sto sqma 1.2, pou oi gkri kmboi
7
Mia llh mjodo
enswmtwsh
twn qarakthristikn twn drntwn enai msw mo-
ntlwn koinwnik
epdrash
, sta opoa oi desmo tou diktou problpoun exwgen
ta
qarakthristik (Robins et al., 2001b [33]).
1 MONT
ELA EKJETIK
WN TUQA
IWN GRAFHM
ATWN MARKOV 18
nwnik plasia. Basismnoi sthn doulei tou Feld (1981) [6, prteinan gia pa-
radegmata koinwnik
dom
msa se na qwroqronik plasio, pw
mia omda
anjrpwn sugkentrwmnwn thn dia stigm sto dio mro
. Epsh
jerhsan
koinwnik
dom
msa se na perisstero afhrhmno koinwnikopolitistik
qro, pw
zegh atmwn sundedemnwn msw twn politikn desmesen
tou
, kaj
kai dom
, pou antanaklon kpoiou
exwteriko
periorismo
,
pw
oi organwtik
dom
.
'Ena epiprsjeto knhtro gia thn eisagwg twn koinwnikn plaiswn enai to
gegon
ti h exrthsh Markov fanetai mh realistik gia megla dktua, sta
opoa oi drnte
mpore akmh kai na mh gnwrzoun kai gia thn parxh k-
poiwn llwn drntwn kai na mh diajtoun trpou
na rjoun se epaf
maz
tou
, all mw
oi endeqmenoi desmo tou
jewrontai akma ti mporon
na ephresoun kai llou
pijano
desmo
. An h upjesh gia th dom en
koinwniko plaisou enai kal jemeliwmnh, uprqoun epiptsei
ston tpo
twn dedomnwn, pou prpei na sugkentrwjon, gia mia plrh katanhsh tou
koinwniko diktou. Gia peraitrw epexergase
se autn thn katejunsh
dete Schweinberger & Snijders (2003) [35].
1.4 Ektmhsh
pou (i) to jroisma enai gia lou
tou
sqhmatismo
A, pou periqoun ta
Yij , (ii) A enai h parmetro
, pou antistoiqe sto sqhmatism A, (iii) dA (y)
1 MONT
ELA EKJETIK
WN TUQA
IWN GRAFHM
ATWN MARKOV 20
enai h statistik twn metaboln, dhlad, twn metaboln sthn tim th
di-
ktuak
statistik
zA (y), tan to yij allzei ap 1 se 0, kai (iv) yij
C enai
tuqawn grafhmtwn.
1.5 Ne Prodiagraf
H statistik (6) perilambnei astria lwn twn txewn, all, gia megalte-
ro th
monda
, h epdrash twn asterin anterh
txh
meinetai, gia megla
k kai gia enallassmena prshma. Me autn thn nnoia, h upjesh enai ml-
lon genikterh ap thn apl epibol sti
paramtrou
twn asterin anterh
txh
th
tim
0, pou enai h upjesh, pou uponoetai sthn (4).9
Aut pou enai shmantik enai p
ermhneetai aut h parmetro
msw twn
sunepein, pou qei gia th dom tou grafmato
. Fusik, h ektmhsh mia
pa-
ramtrou gia mia dojesa topik dom enai sunjw
endeiktik th
ktash
,
me thn opoa h dom empeirik parathretai (arke na mhn uprqoun zhtmata
ekfulismo ditropikthta
). All h sussreush autn twn domn ja pa-
rgei idiatere
sunolik
diktuak
dom
, opte, tan na dktuo emfanzei
ttoie
dom
, ja mporosame na perimnoume ti
ektimsei
twn sqetikn pa-
ramtrwn na enai megle
kai axioshmewte
.
Yrs kai Ysv (k.o.k.) upotjetai epsh
ti enai anexrthta. Den enai dskolo
na parathrsoume diaisjhtik ti, tan isqoun oi upojsei
th
exrthsh
koinwnikn kuklwmtwn kai exrthsh
Markov, kpoioi sqhmatismo, pou e-
nai pio polplokoi ap ti ta apl trgwna, enai shmantiko gia to montlo.
Oi Snijders et al. (2006) [38 prteinan epsh
mia parmetro, pou enai -
na
sqhmatism
mikrterh
txh
gia na k-trgwno, thn k-2-diadrom. Oi
sqhmatismo twn k-2-diadromn paristnoun ton arijm twn diakekrimnwn
2-diadromn anmesa se na zeugri kmbwn. Mporon na jewrhjon w
k-
trgwna qwr
na sumperilambnoun th bsh. To knhtro gia ti
k-2-diadrom
enai h eisagwg mia
paramtrou, pou tan qrhsimopoietai se sunduasm me
ta k-trgwna, ja kajist ikano
tou
ereunht
na diakrnoun ti
tsei
sqh-
matismo akmn sth bsh sti
pleur
en
k-trignou. Parathrome ti
oi pleur
en
k-trignou, tan den uprqei h bsh, pariston nan tpo o-
madopohsh
akmn, pou apotele mno thn propjesh th
metabatikthta
,
en h parousa th
akm
th
bsh
antanakl th metabatik kleistthta.
'Etsi, aut
o sunduasm
twn paramtrwn pistopoie thn pesh gia metaba-
tik kleistthta (all mia pesh, pou den auxnetai grammik me to k ston
ekjth). To sqma 1.4 deqnei dom
2-, 3- kai 4-2-diadromn. Akolojw
,
oi metrsei
autn twn domn enswmatnontai se mia statistik anlogh me
thn (7).
thn katanom twn bajmn, all jtei megaltero bro
sto pljo
twn kmbwn me tou
qamhlterou
bajmo
, me ta brh na meinontai
gewmetrik so oi bajmo auxnontai.
2 To Dktuo Florentine
2.1 Exerenhsh Diktou
R> library(statnet)
R> library(ergm)
R> library(sna)
Gia na dome to snolo twn dedomnwn, pou enai diajsima sto statnet, ekte-
lome:
R> data()
R> data(florentine)
R> flomarriage
kai parnoume:
Network attributes:
vertices = 16
directed = FALSE
hyper = FALSE
loops = FALSE
multiple = FALSE
2 TO D
IKTUO FLORENTINE 32
total edges= 20
Vertex attribute names:
vertex.names wealth priorates totalties
edgelist matrix:
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 9 1
[2,] 6 2
[3,] 7 2
[4,] 9 2
[5,] 5 3
[6,] 9 3
[7,] 7 4
[8,] 11 4
[9,] 15 4
[10,] 11 5
[11,] 15 5
[12,] 8 7
[13,] 16 7
[14,] 13 9
[15,] 14 9
[16,] 16 9
[17,] 14 10
[18,] 15 11
[19,] 15 13
[20,] 16 13
R> plot(flomarriage)
pou lambnoume:
Newton-Raphson iterations: 5
MLE Coefficients:
edges
-1.609
Mia arket pio eqrhsth, pio analutik kai qwr
peritt
plhrofore
entol
enai h ktwji:
R> summary(flomodel1.01)
pou parnoume:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 5
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -1.6094 0.2449 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 *** 0.001 ** 0.01 *
0.05 . 0.1 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood
and are suspect.
Aut pou ma
endiafrei mesa enai h ermhnea tou montlou. Ap ,ti bl-
poume, to log-odds na uprqei mia akm enai 1.609, me antstoiqh pijanth-
ta 0.1667275 (= exp(1.609)/[1 + exp(1.609)]). To apotlesma aut to
perimname dedomnou ti h puknthta tou diktou upologzetai ti enai sh
me 0.16 (= 20/(16 15/2)).
Ta antikemena tou R katqoun pnta mia klsh. Gia na dome thn klsh tou
flomodel.02, den qoume par na ektelsoume thn entol:
R> class(flomodel.02)
pou lambnoume:
[1] "ergm"
'Ena llo montlo prosarmog
enai to ex
, sto opoo ddetai barthta sto
qarakthristik wealth:
me antstoiqa apotlesma:
R> summary(flomodel.03)
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 4
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -2.594929 0.536056 NA <1e-04 ***
nodecov.wealth 0.010546 0.004674 NA 0.0259 *
---
Signif. codes: 0 *** 0.001 ** 0.01 * 0.05
. 0.1 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood
and are suspect.
Null Pseudo-deviance: 166.355 on 120 degrees of freedom
2 TO D
IKTUO FLORENTINE 36
R> help("ergm-terms")
Basic terms
Edges X X
mutual X
Degree terms
degree X vec. of degrees attrname
idegree X vec. of degrees attrname
odegree X vec. of degrees attrname
gwdegree X alpha, fixed
isolates X
Star terms
Kstar X vec. of degrees attrname
istar X vec. of degrees attrname
ostar X vec. of degrees attrname
m2star X
Actor-specific effects
receiver X
sender X
sociality X
Bounded terms
bounded.degree X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.idegree X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.odegree X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.kstar X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.istar X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.ostar X bound, vec. of degrees
Aut pou ma
endiafrei sthn prosomowsh enai kat pso ja lboume dktua,
ta stoiqea twn opown antapokrnontai qwr
idiatere
apoklsei
sta arqik
2 TO D
IKTUO FLORENTINE 38
12 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
13 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
14 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
15 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
en ap thn trth entol kai thn dignwsh th
poithta
th
prosarmog
prokptei to paraktw sqma.
Goodnessoffit diagnostics
0.5
0.4
proportion of nodes
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
degree
A
jewrsoume loipn arqik kpoia diagnwstik gia thn akrbeia tou algor-
jmou prosomowsh
kai trpou
beltws
tou:
me apotelsmata:
R> mcmc.diagnostics(fit,center=F)
Correlations of sample statistics:
, , cor
edges kstar2 kstar3 triangle
edges 1.0000000 0.8999023 0.7366523 0.4254382
kstar2 0.8999023 1.0000000 0.9510883 0.7219644
kstar3 0.7366523 0.9510883 1.0000000 0.8255294
triangle 0.4254382 0.7219644 0.8255294 1.0000000
, , lag1
R> mcmc.diagnostics(fit,center=F)
, , lag1
R> mcmc.diagnostics(fit,center=F)
3 To Dktuo FMH
3.1 Exerenhsh Diktou
Afo fortsoume to statnet kai ti
bibliojke
tou ergm kai tou sna,
diabzoume ta dedomna tou diktou Faux Magnolia High:
R> data(faux.magnolia.high)
To dktuo aut to metonomzoume fmh:
R> fmh
Dedomnou mw
ti to apotlesma th
prohgomenh
entol
enai idiate-
ra ektetamno (perilambnei kai th lsta akmn tou diktou), mporome na
ektelsoume thn dia entol me thn paraktw sntomh morf:
R> summary(fmh)
opte parnoume:
Network attributes:
vertices: 1461
directed:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
hyper:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
loops:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
multiple:
Mode FALSE
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 44
logical 1
bipartite:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
density = 0.000913242
Vertex attributes:
vertex.names:
Grade:
7 8 9 10 11 12
185 210 317 299 257 193
Sex:
F M
768 693
Blpoume ti to dktuo qei 1461 koruf
kai 974 akm
. Profan
, upr-
qoun poll
memonwmne
koruf
(memonwmnoi majht
). Epsh
, blpoume
ti oi koruf
(majht
) qoun tra qarakthristik: ful, bajmologa kai
flo (majhtn).
R> plot(fmh,displayisolates=FALSE)
'Opw
blpoume, uprqei mia meglh sunistsa kai arket
lle
, faner
mikrtere
. Prpei na pome pli ti qoume {afairsei} ti
memonwmne
koruf
. An den ti
afairosame, ja prokupte na arket pio pukn kai
{dusangnwsto} dktuo, pou fanetai sto sqma 3.2.
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 45
Gia na proume tra thn katanom twn sunistwsn tou diktou ektelome
thn entol:
R> table(component.dist(fmh)$csize)
h opoa dnei:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 19 23 439
524 64 29 11 12 4 7 4 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mporome na sqedisoume to dktuo me ti
koruf
qrwmatismne
anloga
th
bajmologa
twn majhtn (sqma 3.3). H entol qei w
ex
:
R> plot(fmh,displayisolates=FALSE,vertex.col="Grade")
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 46
R> fmh.degreedist<-table(degree(fmh,cmode="indegree"))
R> fmh.degreedist
parnoume:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
524 403 271 128 85 30 13 5 2
H entol aut mpore na prei kai thn ex
morf:
R> summary(fmh~degree(0:8))
Gia thn katanom twn bajmn anloga me ta qarakthristik twn majhtn, h
entol enai:
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 47
R> summary(fmh~degree(0:8,"Attribute")),
pou sth jsh tou Attribute bzoume, kat antistoiqa, aut pou ma
en-
diafrei (Grade, Sex, Race).
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Grade")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
7 8 9 10 11 12
7 110 11 3 3 0 0
8 11 165 9 7 0 2
9 3 9 152 24 10 4
10 3 7 24 151 38 11
11 0 0 10 38 152 32
12 0 2 4 11 32 90
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Sex")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
F M
F 430 285
M 285 259
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Race")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
Asian Black Hisp NatAm Other White
Asian 7 4 0 1 0 35
Black 4 85 9 3 0 57
Hisp 0 9 1 0 0 48
NatAm 1 3 0 3 0 25
Other 0 0 0 0 0 5
White 35 57 48 25 5 691
R> model1<-ergm(fmh~edges)
R> summary(model1)
kai parnoume:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 8
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -6.99760 0.03205 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 *** 0.001 ** 0.01 * 0.05 .
0.1 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive
pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
R> names(model1)
[1]"coef" "sample" "iterations" "mle.lik"
"MCMCtheta" "loglikelihoodratio" "gradient"
[8]"hessian" "covar" "samplesize" "failure"
"mc.se" "glm" "glm.null"
[15]"null.deviance" "aic" "theta1"
"offset" "drop" "network" "newnetwork"
[22]"formula" "constraints" "prop.weights"
'Omw
ta plon endiafronta stoiqea gia thn anlus kai thn sgkrish tou
montlou enai oi suntelest
(coefficients) kai h pijanofneia (likelihood):
R> model1$coef
edges
-6.997596
R> model1$mle.lik
[1] -7790.104
'Ena kal montlo, gia na arqsoume, enai aut pou protenei mia tsh gia
taxinomhmnh anmeixh - dhlad, ti uprqei megalterh pijanthta sqhmati-
smo sundsewn metax atmwn th
dia
ful
, flou bajmologa
. Au-
t to montlo enai to katllhlo gia na proqwrsoume thn reuna, dedom-
nou ti emfanzei duadik anexarthsa. 'Opw
exhgetai ap tou
Hunter et
al. (2008b) [16], ttoia montla jewrontai genik
ti enai pio ekolo na
prosarmoston ap ti lla montla kai h diadikasa prosarmog
aut kje
aut den ephrezetai ap to en to montlo enai akatllhlo gia ta dedomna.
Se autn thn perptwsh aut apotele epsh
mia arket logik upjesh pou
mpore na protaje gia ttoia montla.
A
elgxoume loipn thn tsh gia taxinomhmnh anmeixh, h opoa enai omoimor-
fh gia kje klsh qarakthristikn dhlad, thn perptwsh pou uprqei h
dia tsh gia snayh sqsewn metax majhtn th
dia
ful
(gia pardeig-
ma), anexrthta ap th ful, sthn opoa anafermaste. Aut to montlo
mpore na prosarmoste qrhsimopointa
thn entol nodematch me to proka-
jorismno risma th
diff=FALSE:
Opte parnoume:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Formula: fmh ~ edges + nodematch("Grade") + nodematch("Race") +
nodematch("Sex")
Newton-Raphson iterations: 9
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -10.01277 0.11526 NA <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Grade 3.23105 0.08788 NA <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Race 1.19646 0.08147 NA <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Sex 0.88438 0.07057 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 *** 0.001 ** 0.01 * 0.05 .
0.1 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive
pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
Null Pseudo-deviance: 1478525 on 1066530 deg. of freedom
Residual Pseudo-deviance: 13057 on 1066526 deg. of freedom
Pseudo-deviance: 1465467 on 4 deg. of freedom
AIC: 13065 BIC: 13113
R> model2$coef
kai
Blpoume ti kai oi tsserei
roi enai shmantiko. Epsh
blpoume mia dra-
matik axhsh sthn pijanofneia tou montlou auto se sqsh me to prto
montlo. Ja mporose kane
na kane, an jele, nan tupik legqo tou
lgou pijanofanein metax twn do montlwn.
Ap ti blpoume, to posost ton protsewn pou gnane dekt
enai 33%. 'H,
alli
, epeid allxame ton arijm twn bhmtwn sthn alusda th
prosomow-
sh
(thn tim tou burn-in) ap ton prokajorismno arijm 1.000 se 1.000.000,
mporome na pome ti 330.000 protsei
ap ti
sunolik
1.000.000 gnane
dekt
. Epiprsjeta, to risma verbose=TRUE ma
deqnei sta apotelsmata
to posost th
epituqa
th
prosomows
ma
.
Kti pou krnetai idiaitrw
qrsimo enai h extash twn mixing matrices gia
ta qarakthristik tou diktou gia na dome p
aut mporon na sugkrijon:
R> mixingmatrix(sim2,"Sex")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
F M
F 420 295
M 295 290
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Sex")
F M
F 430 285
M 285 259
Hisp 0 9 5 1 0 32
NatAm 0 0 1 0 0 16
Other 1 0 0 0 0 2
White 20 112 32 16 2 760
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Race")
Asian Black Hisp NatAm Other White
Asian 7 4 0 1 0 35
Black 4 85 9 3 0 57
Hisp 0 9 1 0 0 48
NatAm 1 3 0 3 0 25
Other 0 0 0 0 0 5
White 35 57 48 25 5 691
R> mixingmatrix(sim2,"Grade")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
7 8 9 10 11 12
7 64 6 9 8 12 3
8 6 89 15 12 4 10
9 9 15 234 14 17 8
10 8 12 14 214 19 10
11 12 4 17 19 146 7
12 3 10 8 10 7 104
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Grade")
7 8 9 10 11 12
7 110 11 3 3 0 0
8 11 165 9 7 0 2
9 3 9 152 24 10 4
10 3 7 24 151 38 11
11 0 0 10 38 152 32
12 0 2 4 11 32 90
Epsh
, kti pou endiafrei mesa, enai h sgkrish th
katanom
twn baj-
mn:
R> plot(summary(fmh~degree(0:10)),type="l",lty=1)
R> lines(summary(sim2~degree(0:10)),lty=2)
Tlo
, a
dome kai th sgkrish tou pljou
twn trignwn:
R> summary(fmh~triangle) triangle
169
R> summary(sim2~triangle) triangle
2
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 54
500
400
summary(fmh ~ degree(0:10))
300
200
100
0
2 4 6 8 10
Index
R> model3<-ergm(fmh~edges+triangle)
R> pdf("model3diagnostics.pdf")
R> mcmc.diagnostics(model3)
R> dev.off()
Ap thn llh meri, prpei kane
na enai prosektik
na mhn apodeqje po-
l grgora ton ekfulism tou montlou. Ta problmata sgklish
, pou
perigrfhsan, mporon, se orismne
periptsei
, na ofelontai qi epeid
to montlo enai ekfulismno, all apl
epeid h alusda Markov den qei
afeje na trxei gia arket meglo qronik disthma ste na mporsei na ka-
lyei to deigmatoqro epark
. Idiatera, kti ttoio mpore na sumbe, en
oi arqik
tim
th
ektmhsh
brskontai pol makri ap thn ektmhsh th
mgisth
pijanofneia
(MLE). Prin loipn katalxei kane
sth dignwsh
tou ekfulismo, ja prpei na diereunsei kpoie
epiprsjete
epilog
. Gia
aut to idiatero montlo, kama ap ti
epilog
aut
den mpore na bohjsei
shmantik, all ja ti
ektelsoume en edei exskhsh
.
Mia mesh lsh ja tan h axhsh tou megjou
diastmato
kai twn do
tou degmato
sto MCMC:
Warning:
The network has more than 50000 edges, and the model is
likely to be degenerate.
Warning: The diagnostics indicate that the model is very
unstable.
They suggest that the model is degenerate,
and that the numerical summaries are suspect.
Mia llh lsh ja tan h mewsh tou mkou
tou bmato
h axhsh tou
sunoliko arijmo epanalyewn kai ta do:
prokajorismnh tou morf to MCMC sto ergm den qei periorismo
, all
diabajmzei thn epilog twn desmn (yi,j = 1) kai twn mh desmn (yi,j = 0)
tsi ste na exasfalzetai h epilog kje txh
me sunolik pijanthta 0.5
anexrthta ap thn puknthta tou diktou. Sto statnet h lsh aut o-
nomzetai TNT (dhlad, tie/no-tie desm
/mh-desm
). 'Omw
, ja
mporose na epilege mia lsh, pou periorzei to deigmatik qro, p.q., me
th stajeropohsh tou sunoliko arijmo akmn tou bajmo kmbwn. Aut
mporon na epilegon prosjtonta
to risma constraints=~edges con-
straints=~degrees sthn entol ergm, antistoqw
. H lsh aut sthrzetai
sth jewrhtik pepojhsh ti oi periorismo mporon na sullboun th genik
ida th
stoqastik
diadikasa
pou dipei to dktuo. An aut de sumbanei,
ja uprqei kpoio
ekfulism
. 'Alle
epilog
gia periorismo
diabajm-
sei
tou MCMC dnontai sthn ergasa twn Morris et al. (2008) [20] mporon
na brejon sth bojeia th
entol
ergm.
gwesp.fixed.0
1.7899988
W
pardeigma, ja upojsoume ti qoume na zeugri drntwn, pou diaf-
roun se la ta qarakthristik tou
. An den qoun koino
flou
, tte to
log-odds tou
na gnoun floi enai 9.795. En qoun ton opoiodpote jetik
arijm koinn flwn kai kje na
ap auto
enai se na toulqiston tr-
gwno me lou
tou
llou
, tte to log-odds autn na gnoun floi anrqetai
se 7.997 (= 9.795 + 1.798). Epiplon, en to eqe jetik tim (antjeta
me thn perptwsh aut pou = 0), tte to log-odds tou
na gnoun floi
ja eqe auxhje montona (all up-grammik) w
pro
ton arijm twn koinn
filn. En kpoioi ap tou
koino
flou
twn do drntwn den tan se
kpoia trgwna metax tou
, tte to log-odds auxnetai akma perisstero:
sthn perptwsh = 0, prostjetai to 1.798 gia kje akm, pou den enai se
kpoio trgwno, kai to 1, tan oi do drnte
gnoun floi.
R> model4.take1$mle.lik
R> model4.take2$mle.lik
R> model4.take3$mle.lik
me apotelsmata:
[1] -5604.138
[2] -5550.591
[3] -5500.916
R> summary(model4.take1)
R> summary(model4.take2)
R> summary(model4.take3)
Parathrome ti, anexrthta th
tim
tou , loi oi roi enai statistik sh-
mantiko kai oi suntelest
den allzoun kat pol. Epilgoume thn perptw-
sh = 0.2, gia na suneqsoume (ja mporosame na eqame prei opoiadpote
llh tim):
R> class(sim4)
[1] "network.series"
R> names(sim4)
[1] "formula" "networks" "stats" "coef"
R> class(sim4$networks[[1]])
[1] "network"
R> model4.tridist<-sapply(1:100,function(x){summary(sim4
R+ $networks[[x]]~triangle)})
R> hist(model4.tridist,xlim=c(50,200))
R> fmh.tri <- summary(fmh~triangle)
R> arrows(fmh.tri,20,fmh.tri,5,col="red",lwd=3)
Me thn entol:
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 63
Histogram of model4.tridist
30
25
20
Frequency
15
10
5
0
model4.tridist
Oi Goodreau et al. (2008) [10] qoun anaptxei kpoion kdika, pou ulopoie
autmata le
ti
parapnw fsei
poithta
prosarmog
gia kpoie
koin
katanom
diktwn. Aut
perilambnoun thn katanom bajmn, thn katanom
twn akmiak diamoirasmnwn etarwn (edgewise shared partners, dhlad, to
pljo
twn akmn, sti
opoe
do floi qoun akrib
k koino
flou
)
kai thn gewdaitik katanom (to pljo
twn zeugn drntwn gia ta opoa
h plhsisterh metax tou
diadrom qei mko
k, gia kje tim tou k). A
dokimsoume prta na dome thn katanom twn bajmn:
R> gof4.deg <- gof(model4~degree,verbose=TRUE,burnin=1e+5,
R+ interval=1e+5)
O kdika
aut
prosomoinei na pljo
diktwn (me prokajorismnh tim
100), upologzei ti
statistik
gia aut se sqsh me to arqik dktuo, kaj
kai ti
p-tim
. Molonti lh h plhrofora apojhkeetai sto antikemeno
gof4.deg kai mpore na diereunhje amsw
, enai mllon eukoltero na exeta-
ste (toulqiston arqik) me mia apl grafik parstash twn dedomnwn.
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 64
Goodnessoffit diagnostics
0.4
0.3
proportion of nodes
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
degree
Tra a
pme sthn katanom twn akmiak diamoirasmnwn etarwn kai sthn
katanom th
gewdaitik
apstash
:
Sto sqma 3.9 qoume th grafik parstash twn katanomn autn sthn
klmaka log-odds, h opoa lambnetai ap ti
entol
:
R> get(getOption("device"))(width=8,height=4)
R> par(mfrow=c(1,2))
R> plot(gof4.esp.dist,plotlogodds=TRUE)
Ap thn llh pleur, den qoume sumperilbei tpote sqetk me thn apstash
sto montlo ma
, parti h apstash enai mia sunolik idithta tou diktou.
Gia aut, paramnoun anapnthta erwtmata pw
: Pso kal tairizoun oi
prosomoiomene
katanom
apstash
me thn parathromenh? Po ofelontai
oi diafor
? Mporome na epektenoume to montlo, gia na petqoume mia
kalterh poithta prosarmog
? Ttoia erwtmata diereunntai sth bibli-
ografa, pw
oi Morris et al. (2008) [20], pou dnoun mia plrh lsta twn
diajsimwn orismtwn gia autn th diadikasa.
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 66
0
Goodnessoffit diagnostics
0
logodds for an edge
5
4
10
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 4 7 11 15 19 23 27 31 35 39 43
Sqma 3.9: Poithta prosarmog
tou montlou 4 gia thn katanom twn
akmiak diamoirasmnwn etarwn kai thn katanom th
gewdaitik
apstash
.
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 67
Arqzoume loipn me thn exerenhsh tou diktou IPRED. Kat' arqn, prpei
na kataskeusoume to dktuo (msw tou R) ap ta emepirik dedomna pou -
qoume. Epeid ta dedomna aut tan diajsima sto SPSS, msw tou Excel, ta
eisaggame sto statnet. Afo loipn fortsoume ta dedomna, proqwrme
sth melth tou diktou.
Network attributes:
vertices: 289
directed:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
hyper:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
loops:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
multiple:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
bipartite:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
total edges= 424
density = 0.01018839
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 68
Vertex attributes:
vertex.names:
Length Class Mode
289 character character
IPRED_Actor_Coalitions:
IPRED_Positions:
Summaqe drntwn.
Onmata drntwn.
Gia na proume ton plrh arijm twn sunistwsn (anloga tou megjou
),
ektelome:
R> table(component.dist(ipn)$csize)
me apotlesma:
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 69
289
1
'Etsi, blpoume ti uprqei mia mno meglh sunistsa me 289 drnte
. 'Ara,
den uprqoun memonwmnoi drnte
.
R> plot(ipn,vertex.col="IPRED_Actor_Types"))
kai
R> plot(ipn,vertex.col=""IPRED_Positions""))
Ta sqmata, pou prokptoun, fanontai sthn epmenh selda.
R> ipn.degreedist<-table(degree(ipn,cmode="indegree"))
R> ipn.degreedist
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 70
me apotelsmata:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 14 15
216 30 5 7 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 2 1
16 18 41 44 59 61 72
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
R> summary(ipn~edges+triangle)
parnoume:
edges triangle
424 197
R> mixingmatrix(ipn,"IPRED_Actor_Types")
R> mixingmatrix(ipn,"IPRED_Positions")
Sth sunqeia, ja knoume akrib thn dia melth kai gia to dktuo SWPAT.
Arqik h metonomasa:
R> summary(swn)
Network attributes:
vertices: 691
directed:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
hyper:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
loops:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
multiple:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
bipartite:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
total edges= 1004
density = 0.004211498
Vertex attributes:
vertex.names:
Length Class Mode
691 character character
SWPAT_Actor_Coalitions:
ALDE BSA COM EconomicMajorityCom
1 53 1 98
EDRi EICTA EICTA-SMEs
1 91 53
EPP-ED Eurolinux FFII Greens-EFA
1 286 1 1
GUE-NGL Independent MEP
1 1 1
Other-Unknown PatentFreiDe PSE UEN
84 15 1 1
SWPAT_Actor_Types:
Firm Indiv MEP-Party Orgs
533 9 8 141
SWPAT_Positions:
Contra Neutral Pro
407 70 214
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 73
R> table(component.dist(swn)$csize)
parnoume:
691
1
Pli uprqei mia meglh sunistsa me 691 drnte
kai kajlou memonwmnoi
drnte
.
R> plot(swn)
R> plot(SWPAT,vertex.col="swn_Actor_Types"))
R> plot(SWPAT,vertex.col="swn_Positions"))
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 74
parnoume:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15
588 26 7 6 7 1 10 5 10 6 3 3 2 2
R> summary(swn~edges+triangle)
dnei:
edges triangle
1004 723
R> mixingmatrix(swn,"SWPAT_Actor_Types")
kai
R> mixingmatrix(swn,"SWPAT_Positions")
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 7
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -4.57627 0.04881 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 *** 0.001 ** 0.01 * 0.05 . 0.1 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
exp(logodds)
P = .
(1 + exp(logodds))
R> exp(-4.57627)/(1+exp(-4.57627))
[1] 0.01018835
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 77
Aut pou gnwrzoume kai perimnoume na isqei enai ti, epeid douleoume
me montlo akmn, h pijanthta parxh
mia
akm
ja enai sqedn sh me
thn puknthta tou diktou, gegon
to opoo epalhjeetai, pw
mporome na
dome me thn entol summary(ipn), ap thn opoa parnoume thn puknthta
sh me 0.01018839.
dnei:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 7
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -5.5291 0.1071 NA < 1e-04
*** nodematch.IPRED_actor_types 0.2967 0.0986 NA
0.00263 ** nodematch.IPRED_Positions 1.4363 0.1088 NA <
1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 *** 0.001 ** 0.01 * 0.05 . 0.1 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
R> model2$coef
edges nodematch.IPRED_Actor_Types nodematch.IPRED_Positions
-5.5290993 0.2966679 1.4363335
P () = 0.003953868,
P (1 ) = 0.005312155,
P (2 ) = 0.01641892,
P (3 ) = 0.02196494.
Sth sunqeia, knoume thn dia akrib
melth kai gia to dktuo SWPAT.
Pragmatopoiome thn arqik prosarmog se na montlo akmn:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 8
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 79
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -5.46572 0.03163 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 *** 0.001 ** 0.01 * 0.05 . 0.1 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
Pli perimnoume h pijanthta parxh
mia
akm
na enai sqedn sh me thn
puknthta tou diktou, gegon
to opoo epalhjeetai, pw
mporome na
dome me thn entol summary(swn), ap thn opoa parnoume thn puknthta
sh me 0.004211498.
dnei:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 8
Pseudolikelihood Results:
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 80
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
R> model2$coef
P () = 0.002628387,
P (1 ) = 0.0003878042,
P (2 ) = 0.02005366,
P (3 ) = 0.003003542.
5 Parrthma
5.1 To Peribllon R
5.1.1 Genik Parousash
Sto parrthma aut ja knoume mia pol sntomh parousash tou peribllon-
to
R, to opoo apotele na oloklhrwmno pakto elejerou logismiko, pou
qrhsimopoietai gia th diaqerish dedomnwn, upologismo
, grafik
anapa-
rastsei
kai gia statistik
analsei
(Venables & Smith, 2008 [42]). To
peribllon R diatjetai elejera ap ton isttopo http://cran.r.org/.
$ mkdir work
$ cd work
$ R
$ q()
$ help(solve)
$ ?solve
$ source ("Commands.R")
5.1.2 Pakta
'Ole
oi sunartsei
tou R, kaj
kai ta snola twn dedomnwn, enai apojhk-
eumna se pakta (packages). Mno tan fortnoume na pakto, ta peri-
eqmen tou enai diajsima. To R prosfrei th dunatthta se proqwrhmnou
epipdou qrste
na dhmiourgsoun ta dik tou
pakta, kti pou profan
fanetai na enai idiatera eqrhsto. Epeid mw
sto parrthma aut knou-
me apl
mia eisagwg sto R, de ja anaferjome sto exeidikeumno aut jma.
Gia na dome tra poia pakta enai diajsima, ektelome thn entol:
$ library(),
$ library(boot)
$ help.start(),
5.1.3 Diansmata
'Opw
kai stou
pragmatiko
arijmo
, tsi kai sta diansmata, oi stoiqei-
dei
arijmhtiko telest
enai oi + , - , * , / kai .
sqrt(-17)
sqrt(-17 + 0i)
$ seq(-5, 5, by=.2)
TRUE, tan to x enai megaltero tou 13 kai thn tim FALSE, tan to x enai
mikrtero tou 13.
Bibliografa
[1 Anderson, C.J., Wasserman, S., & Crouch, B. (1999). A p primer: logit
models for social networks. Social Networks, 21, 37-66.
[2] Besag, J. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of latti-
ce systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36, 96-127.
[3] Besag, J.E. (1975). Statistical analysis of non-lattice data. The Stati-
stician, 24, 179-195.
[4] Boudourides, M., & Haunss, S. (2008). A social network analysis of two
European intellectual property conflicts. Paper presended at the 2008
ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Rennes, 11-16 April 2008.
[6] Feld, S. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Jour-
nal of Sociology, 86, 1015-1035.
[8] Frank, O., & Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the Ame-
rican Statistical Association, 81, 832-842.
[9] Goodreau, S.M., Handcock, M.S., Hunter, D.R., & Butts, C.T. (2006).
Statnet Tutorial, Sunbelt XXVI, Vancouver BC, 26 April 2006.
[10] Goodreau, S.M., Handcock, M.S., Hunter, D.R., Butts, C.T., & Morris,
M. (2008). A Statnet Tutorial. Journal of Statistical Software, 24, 1-26.
[11] Handcock, M.S. (2003). Statistical models for social networks: dege-
neracy and inference. In R. Breiger, K. Carley, & P. Pattison (Eds.),
Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis. Washington, DC: Na-
tional Academies Press, pp. 229-240.
[12] Handcock, M., Hunter, D., Butts, C., Goodreau, S., & Morris, M.
(2006). Statnet: An R Package for the Statistical Analysis and Simu-
lation of Social Networks. Manual. University of Washington. URL:
http://www.csde.washington.edu/statnet.
[27] Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E., & Woolcock, J. (2004). Models for social
networks with missing data. Social Networks, 26, 257-283.
[28] Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E., & Woolcock, J. (2005). Social networks
and small worlds. American Journal of Sociology 110, 894-936.
[29] Robins, G.L., & Pattison, P.E. (2005). Interdependencies and social
processes: generalized dependence structures. In: P. Carrington, J.
Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and Methods in Social Netw-
ork Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 192-214.
[30] Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2007a). An Introdu-
ction to Exponential Random Graph (p ) Models for Social Networks.
Social Networks, 29, 173-191.
[31] Robins, G., Snijders, T., Wang, P., Handcock, M., & Pattison, P.
(2007b). Recent Developments in Exponential Random Graph (p ) Mo-
dels for Social Networks. Social Networks, 29, 192-215.
[32] Robins, G.L., Elliott, P., & Pattison, P.E. (2001a). Network models for
social selection processes. Social Networks, 23, 1-30.
[33] Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E., & Elliott, P. (2001b). Network models for
social influence processes. Psychometrika, 66, 161-190.
[34] Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E., & Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models
and logistic regressions for social networks. III. Valued relations. Ps-
ychometrika, 64, 371-394.
[35] Schweinberger, M., & Snijders, T.A.B. (2003). Settings in social netw-
orks: a measurement model. Sociological Methodology, 33, 307-341.
[36] Skvoretz, J., & Faust, K. (1999). Logit models for affiliation networks.
Sociological Methodology, 29, 253-280.
[37] Snijders, T.A.B. (2002). Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of ex-
ponential random graph models. Journal of Social Structure, 3, 2.
[38] Snijders, T.A.B., Pattison, P., Robins, G.L., & Handcock, M. (2006).
New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological
Methodology, 36, 99-153.
[40] Strauss, D., & Ikeda, M. (1990). Pseudo-likelihood estimation for social
networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 204-212.
BIBLIOGRAF
IA 89
[41] Van Duijn, M.A.J., Snijders, T.A.B., & Zijlstra, B.J.H. (2004). p2 : A
random effects model with covariates for directed graphs. Statistica Ne-
erlandica, 58, 234-254.
[42] Venables, W. N., Smith, D.M., & the R Development Core Team (2008).
An Introduction to R, Version 2.6.2.
[43] Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P.E. (1996). Logit models and logistic re-
gressions for social networks. I. An introduction to Markov graphs and
p. Psychometrika, 61, 401-425.