Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Banking System Overview Q4'11
Banking System Overview Q4'11
retail deposits and despite lower pricing versus 2010. 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
On the other hand, provision charges helped the Assets/GDP Loans/GDP Deposits/GDP
10%
parent funding.
8%
Loan book rose 4.1% YoY to BGN 56bn at end- 6%
2011 led by the corporate segment (up 6.2%
4%
YoY). Mortgage loans delivered 1.1% annual growth
in 2011, while consumer continued to stagnate with 2%
KEY FIGURES AND RATIOS 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) 14.5% 13.8% 14.9% 17.0% 17.5% 17.53%
Net Profit in m 413 585 709 399 315 300
Net Interest Margin /NIM/* 4.9% 5.0% 4.9% 4.6% 4.6% 4.4%
Cost / Income 55.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.2% 49.1% 50.4%
ROaE* 20.2% 21.5% 19.2% 8.7% 6.4% 5.75%
ROaA* 2.14% 2.26% 2.10% 1.12% 0.86% 0.78%
Provisions / Gross loans to NFI 3.0% 2.7% 2.4% 4.0% 5.9% 7.3%
NPLs**/ Gross loans to NFI n.a. 2.1% 2.5% 6.4% 11.9% 14.9%
Loans / Assets 73% 76% 80% 82% 79% 79%
Loans / Deposits 93% 96% 105% 109% 104% 102%
Tereza Trifonova FFBH Research team PLEASE REFER TO THE TEXT AT THE END OF THIS REPORT
+359 2 460 64 56 +359 2 460 64 15 FOR OUR DISCLAIMER AND ALL RELEVANT DISCLOSURES
tereza.trifonova@ffbh.bg research@ffbh.bg
BULGARIAN BANKING SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2012
HIGHLIGHTS
Loans with delay in payment of more than 90 days continued to mount but slowed
down growth pace to reach 14.9% of gross loans at 2011 YE (14.5% at end-Sept).
NPLs advanced After a steep increase of BGN 564m in Q311, new NPLs totalled BGN 416m in
slower in Q411, Q4, as mortgage and consumer bad loans lost velocity, while corporate continued
as mortgage and to pick up speed and added BGN 368m in the last quarter of the year.
consumer bad
loans lost velocity, Flash estimates of the National Statistics Institute revealed grim macro picture with
while corporate a feeble 1.5% YoY GDP growth in Q411, while full year 2011 GDP carried a 1.6%
continued to pick YoY increase (lower than the governments forecast of 2.8%), with FDIs hitting a
up speed minimum level. The expected slowdown in Bulgarias exports this year and still
depressed domestic demand signal weak economic growth in 2012. At the same
time unemployment rate is still on the rise as in January it hit 11.1% up from 10.4%
in Dec11. In view of the subdued economic outlook NPLs generation should
continue in 2012, albeit with waning strength.
Meanwhile, impaired loans (loans overdue more than 90 days and restructured
loans) moved up further to 21.9% of gross loans as of end-December 2011 (21.6%
at the end of the previous quarter). The increase came from corporate and
mortgage loans, while impaired consumer loans shrank by 1.5% QoQ and came at
BGN 1.48bn at 2011 YE.
400 8%
19%
6%
200 4%
16%
2%
0 0%
13%
0 0 1 1 1 1
Q 3'1 Q 4'1 Q 1'1 Q 2'1 Q 3'1 Q 4'1
0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
n-1 ug -1 ct-1 ec -1 eb-1 pr -1 un-1 ug -1 ct-1 ec -1
Ju A O D F A J A O D
New NPLs (lhs) NPLs/Gross loans (rhs)
Source: BNB
2
BULGARIAN BANKING SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2012
Q4 net income shrank by 40% on a quarterly basis, after NII contracted by 2.7% and
administrative expenses jumped 6.9%. Provision costs also influenced negatively the
Long-expected bottom line by adding 3% QoQ to BGN 338m in Q4.
peak in NPLs
should finally be FY2011 bad-debt charges were down by 2% YoY, after a steep increase of 29% YoY
reached by end- in 2010. This, in combination with the 4.6% YoY increase in gross loans, brought cost
2012, which of risk to 203bp in 2011 from 217bp a year ago. Our opinion is that long-expected
prompts lower risk peak in NPLs should finally be reached by the end of the current year, which would
costs and less prompt lower risk costs and less pressure on banks bottom line vs. 2011.
pressure on banks
bottom line vs.
2011 Profitability Net income
7% 225
600
6% 220
500
5% 215
400
4% 210
in B G N m
in b p
3% 205 300
ROE deteriorated
2% 200 200
to 5.75% in 2011
from 6.36% in 1% 195 100
2010
0% 190 0
YE 10 Q1 11 H1 11 9m 11 YE 11
'0 9 '10 '1 0 '1 0 '10 '1 1 '11 '1 1 '11
Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Cost of risk (rhs) NIM (lhs) ROaE (lhs) Pre Provision profit Net profit Provision charge
* Net provisions and ROaE calculated on a TTM basis; Cost of risk is defined as net provisioning expenses
(ttm) divided by average gross loans
Source: BNB
2011 ROE edged down to 5.75% against 6.36% in 2010, after FY2011 net income
NIM deterioration marked a 5% YoY decrease on 1.7% YoY lower NII and 2% YoY increase in OPEX.
which started in Despite 2% YoY fall in bad-debt costs in 2011, provisioning needs remain high and eat
Q311 continued up significant portion of Bulgarian banks bottom line result, thus contributing to a lower
into Q4 ROE vs. that of CEE peers. Therefore, the expected decline of impairment should ease
bottom line pressure in the coming quarters.
We should note that the deterioration in the net interest margin, which started in Q3
continued into the last quarter of 2011. Thus, NIM contracted to 4.4% in 2011, from
4.5% as of 9m11 and versus 4.6% in 2010. Spreads narrowed to 427bp in 2011 from
451bp in 2010 as result of loan rates decreasing faster than deposit rates and higher
share of liquid assets in total assets vs. 2010.
3
BULGARIAN BANKING SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2012
Deposits add 2.6% QoQ and 13% YoY to BGN 52.8bn at 2011YE
Deposits from customers grew 2.6% QoQ to BGN 52.8bn at end-2011 due to 4.5%
QoQ increase in retail deposits, while at the same time corporate segment shrank by
0.3%. 2011 marked a hefty 13% annual growth in the deposit base, on 14% rise in
deposits from individuals and households and 11% pick-up in corporate deposits. The
Retail deposits structure of the deposit base remained unchanged compared to 2010, as
marked a retail/corporate deposits stood in 60/40 ratio. Parent banks continued to withdraw
substantial 14% financing from their local units as Q4 saw BGN 1bn decrease in deposits from credit
annual increase, institutions (the bulk of which represents parent funding) leading to BGN 3bn decrease
fully offsetting the for FY 2011. Hence, the share of deposits from credit institutions in total liabilities fell to
continuing outflow 9% at 2011YE from 14% a year ago, while the share of deposits from customers grew
of parent support to 80% from 74% at end-2010. We see that the substantial inflow of retail deposits was
more than enough to compensate the outflow of foreign funding.
Stabilization of deposit rates would limit further more significant reduction in lending
rates, while domestic perception of risk remains high. In Q411 average rates on both
new ST and LT loans increased slightly QoQ to 7.65% and 10.66%, respectively. 2011
average rates, however, remained lower versus 2010 by 1pp. and 0.6pp respectively
and came at 7.28% and 10.71%.
Source: BNB
*Loans and deposits from NFI
2011 YE L/D ratio remained unchanged from end-September at 99% but was below
the 108% at the end of 2010, as deposits accumulated faster than loans.
Gross external debt of the banking sector declined to 5.8bn as of end-Nov (14.8% of
4
BULGARIAN BANKING SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2012
9 30%
8
25%
7
percentage of GDP
6 20%
in EUR bn
5
15%
4
3 10%
2
5%
1
0 0%
Nov-09 Mar-10 Jul-10 Nov-10 Mar-11 Jul-11 Nov-11
Grossl debt (lhs) As % of GDP (rhs)
*GDP for 2011 - 38.9bn (NSI flash estimates); GDP for 2010 36.03bn (NSI data as of 11.03.2011) and
GDP for 2009 - 35.04bn.
Source: BNB
Loan book picks up 1.9% QoQ due to growth in the corporate segment
Gross loans marked a 1.9% QoQ increase to BGN 56bn at 2011YE led by growth in
the corporate segment, while consumer and mortgage loans retreated 1.1% and 0.1%
QoQ respectively. The annual increase in loans came at 4.1% mostly as a result of the
6.2% expansion of corporate loans; mortgages also climbed by 1.1% versus 2010, but
consumer contracted by 1.8% YoY.
Gross loans added
4.1% YoY at end- We see loan growth in 2012 in the low single-digit territory with fairly weak business
Dec on 6.2% activity, while at the same time households would remain reluctant to borrow,
growth in the especially if unemployment continues to increase. Given high lending standards and
corporate segment funding constraints (which limit further more significant reduction in deposit pricing) as
and 1.1% YoY well as the weak demand and low income from new lending, rates on loans should not
growth in fall significantly in 2012.
mortgages, while
consumer loans QoQ growth of gross loans
stagnated
5% Corporate
Consumer
4%
Mortgage
3%
2%
1%
0%
Q4 09 Q1 10 Q2 10 Q3 10 Q4 10 Q1 11 Q2 11 Q3 11 Q4 11
-1%
-2%
Source: BNB
5
BULGARIAN BANKING SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2012
A detailed look into the loan sector breakdown reveals that except for transport and
real estate sectors, which contracted in Q4, all other expanded with the highest QoQ
growth rates registered in energy, mining and agriculture. Unlike in the previous two
quarters, loans to the tourist sector increased. Looking at full year 2011, construction
and hotels&restaurants turned out to be the sectors most disfavored by banks,
shrinking by 1.8% YoY and 4.7% YoY, respectively. Full-year loan growth was
strongest in the energy sector (up 30% YoY), followed by agriculture (up 16% YoY)
and mining (up 11% YoY).
Pr
O
En
Tr
Tr
R
th
in
ot
on
ea
oc
at
a
ric
er
-4%
in
er
de
ns
el
er
l
es
g
ul
s
tru
es
s
po
y
,s
&r
tu
s
in
ta
in
ct
r
ew
r
-6%
es
d
t
e
io
te
g
us
ta
ag
n
in
try
ur
d
e
us
a
sy
nt
try
st
s
em
s
Source: BNB
25.9% 25.6%
25.1%
24.4% 24.5%
Source: BNB
6
BULGARIAN BANKING SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2012
FOR RECENT NEWS ON THE BANKS, CLICK BELOW AND SCROLL DOWN:
7
BULGARIAN BANKING SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2012
8
BULGARIAN BANKING SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2012
Provisions / Gross loans to NFI 3.0% 2.7% 2.4% 4.0% 5.88% 7.11%
Provisions (incl. general provisions
charged directly to equity) / Gross
loans to NFI 5.31% 9.03% 10.25%
Non-performing loans** / Gross
loans to NFI 2.1% 2.5% 6.4% 11.9% 14.9%
Provisions / Non-performing loans** 130% 97% 63% 49% 48%
Provisions (incl. general provisions
charged directly to equity) / Non-
performing loans** 130% 97% 83% 76% 69%
Gross loan portfolio mix
Corporate 64% 65% 65% 64% 65% 65%
Consumer 21% 19% 18% 19% 18% 17%
Mortgage 16% 16% 17% 17% 18% 17%
9
BULGARIAN BANKING SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2012
Source: BNB
10
BULGARIAN BANKING SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2012
Forex Gain (losses) 55 662 60 345 51 881 63 580 54 971 17 699 13 442 14 978
Other Operating
Income 54 395 26 699 28 652 17 920 24 968 8 638 9 172 7 882
Net Non-Interest
Income 466 640 471 777 483 232 519 010 534 531 150 113 146 052 145 663
Total Operating
Income 1 576 951 1 897 070 1 938 896 2 010 568 2 001 414 537 562 511 695 501 584
Operating expenses
Administrative
Expenses (747 244) (948 648) (975 226) (980 856) (1 001 351) (264 421) (246 110) (262 988)
Other Operating
Expenses, net (264) (534) 1 815 (5 568) (8 166) (2 508) (662) (5 153)
Credit Provisions,
Decrease (increase) (182 269) (159 438) (520 480) (673 237) (659 760) (189 084) (167 671) (172 666)
Total Expenses (929 777) (1 108 620) (1 493 891) (1 659 662) (1 669 277) (456 013) (414 442) (440 807)
Net Operating
Income 647 174 788 450 445 004 350 907 332 136 81 549 97 252 60 778
Extraordinary items
Income (loss) Before
Tax 647 174 788 450 445 004 350 907 332 136 81 549 97 252 60 778
Tax expenses (63 512) (79 417) (46 099) (39 320) (39 693) (9 828) (10 603) (8 805)
Minority interest +
other after-tax items 1 029 3 708 7 246 0 (1) 1
Net Income 584 692 709 034 398 906 315 295 299 689 71 721 86 649 51 973
Source: BNB
11
BULGARIAN BANKING SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2012
DISCLAIMER
This report has no regard to the individual investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any
specific recipient and should not to be relied upon as authoritative, or taken in substitution for the exercise of
judgment by any receiver. Each recipient should consider the appropriateness of any investment decision
having regard to their own circumstances, the full range of information available and appropriate professional
advice, and should consult their advisors to make sure all involved risks are fully understood.
The information and opinions in this report constitute judgment as at the date of this report, have been
compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or
implied, is made as to their accuracy, completeness or correctness. Opinions expressed herein are subject to
change without notice. This report is not intended to be a complete statement or summary of the securities,
markets or developments mentioned in this report.
Any forecasts or price targets shown for companies discussed in this report may not be achieved due to
multiple risk factors including, without limitation, market volatility, sector volatility, corporate actions, the
unavailability of complete and accurate information and/or the subsequent transpiration that underlying
assumptions made by FFBH, or by other sources relied upon in the report, were inapposite. FFBH accepts no
liability whatsoever for any loss or damage arising from any use of this report or its contents.
The recipient should presume that FFBH, or persons or entities associated with it, or any of its clients, own or have a
position in any securities or investments mentioned in this study, which position may change at any time. FFBH or its
Affiliates may buy, sell or offer to buy or sell, such securities or any related investments as principal or agent on the
open market. FFBH does not act as market maker in the securities mentioned herein.
The analysts certify that their views regarding the companies in this report are independent and that they have
not received nor will receive direct or indirect compensation in exchange for publishing specific views or
recommendations in this report. The recommendation has not been derived as a result of an agreement
between FFBH and the companies mentioned in this report and it has not been presented to the said
companies.
The analysts or persons related to the analysts do not hold 5% or more in any of the companies
mentioned in this report. The analysts or persons related to the analysts do not hold executive positions
or positions of control in any of the companies mentioned in this report. None of the companies
mentioned in this report hold 5% or more in First Financial Brokerage House, but FFBH and First
Investment Bank have common indirect majority owners.
FFBH has not managed an IPO or provided other corporate finance services to the companies mentioned in
this report in the last 12 months. FFBH may provide in the future corporate finance services, or solicit such
business, for the issuers of the securities mentioned in this report.
FFBH is under no obligation to update or keep current the information contain herein.
The procedures undertaken by FFBH to avoid conflicts of interest with regard to investment research
publications are described at http://www.ffbh.bg/Disclaimer.aspx?lan=EN&pid=36.
FFBH uses a three-level recommendation scale: Sell, Hold, and Buy. The recommendations are for
evaluative purposes only.
12
BULGARIAN BANKING SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2012
Count 11 5 4 1 0
Count 0 0 0 1 1
* Corporate Finance Clients are companies from which FFBH has received compensation for providing
corporate finance services within the last 12 months.
13