CHAPTER IV

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

TABLE 4.1

GENDER OF THE RESPONDENT

GENDER
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Male 26 52.0 52.0 52.0
Valid Female 24 48.0 48.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that the gender of the respondent are 52% of the respondent
is male and 48% of the respondent is female.
CHART 4.1

GENDER OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE 4.2

AGE OF THE RESPONDENT

AGE
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Below 30 14 28.0 28.0 28.0
years
30-40 years 19 38.0 38.0 66.0
Valid
40-50 years 8 16.0 16.0 82.0
50 above 9 18.0 18.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that the age of the respondent are 30 % of the respondent is
age group is below 30 years , 38 % of the respondent is age group is 30-40 years and 16% of
the respondent is age group is 40-50 years, 30 % of the respondent is age group is above years.
CHART 4.2

AGE OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE 4.3

MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENT

MARITAL
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Married 25 50.0 50.0 50.0
Un 25 50.0 50.0 100.0
Valid
married
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that the maritial status of the respondent are 50 % of the
respondent is married , 50 % of the respondent is unmarried
CHART 4.3

MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE 4.4

EDUCATION OF THE RESPONDENT

EDUCATION
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
SSLC 13 26.0 26.0 26.0
HSC 20 40.0 40.0 66.0
Valid Graduate 8 16.0 16.0 82.0
Post graduate 9 18.0 18.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that the education qualification of the respondent are 26 %
of the respondent is completed sslc , 40 % of the respondent is completed hsc , ,16 % of the
respondent is completed graduate , 16 % of the respondent is completed as post graduate.
CHART 4.4

EDUCATION OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE 4.5

YEAR OF EXPERIENCE

EXPERIENCE
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
0-1 12 24.0 24.0 24.0
1-2 21 42.0 42.0 66.0
2-3 8 16.0 16.0 82.0
Valid
3 and 9 18.0 18.0 100.0
above
Total 50 100.0 100.0
INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that the experience of the respondent are 24 % of the
respondent are experience is 0-1 years , 42 % of the respondent is 1-2 years experience , ,16 %
of the respondent is 2-3 years experience , 18 % of the respondent is above 3 years experience .
CHART 4.5

YEAR OF EXPERIENCE
TABLE 4.6

DO YOU LIKE TO ATTEND THE TRAINING PROGRAM

attend
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Yes 24 48.0 48.0 48.0
Valid No 26 52.0 52.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that attend the training program of the respondent are 48%
of the respondent are says that attend the training program and 52 % of the respondent are says
that not attend the training program .
CHART 4.6

DO YOU LIKE TO ATTEND THE TRAINING PROGRAM

TABLE 4.7

DO YOU FEEL TRAINING IS NECESSARY FOR ANY EMPLOYEE FOR

DEVELOPING HIS SKILLS

skills
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Yes 26 52.0 52.0 52.0
Valid No 24 48.0 48.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that training is necessary for any employee for developing his
skills of the respondent are 52 % of the respondent are says that yes and 52 % of the
respondent are says that no.
CHART 4.7

DO YOU FEEL TRAINING IS NECESSARY FOR ANY EMPLOYEE FOR

DEVELOPING HIS SKILLS
TABLE 4.8

TRAINING IS ORGANIZED

Training
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Quarterly 13 26.0 26.0 26.0
Half yearly 18 36.0 36.0 62.0
Annually 10 20.0 20.0 82.0
Valid
Every 2 9 18.0 18.0 100.0
years
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that training is organized of the respondent are 26 % of the
respondent are says that training is organized quarterly, 36 % of the respondent are says that
training is organized Half yearly, 20 % of the respondent are says that training is organized
Annually, 18 % of the respondent are says that training is organized Every 2 years. ,
CHART 4.8

TRAINING IS ORGANIZED
TABLE 4.9

SINCE HOW MANY YEARS TRAINING IS BEING PROVIDED

provided
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
0-5 18 36.0 36.0 36.0
5-10 22 44.0 44.0 80.0
Valid
10-15 10 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that years training is being provided of the respondent are 36
% of the respondent are says that 0-5 years training is being provided, 44% of the respondent are
says that 5-10 year training is being provided, 20 % of the respondent are says that 10-15 years.
CHART 4.9

SINCE HOW MANY YEARS TRAINING IS BEING PROVIDED

TABLE 4.10

WHICH TECHNIQUE IS MOST SUITABLE FOR TRAINING

Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative

y Percent Percent
On the job 17 34.0 34.0 34.0
Off the job 22 44.0 44.0 78.0
Valid Depends on 11 22.0 22.0 100.0
need
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that technique is most suitable for training of the respondent
are 34 % of the respondent are says that on the jop training , 44% of the respondent are says that
5-10 year of the job training , 22 % of the respondent are says that depends on need,
CHART 4.10

WHICH TECHNIQUE IS MOST SUITABLE FOR TRAINING

TABLE 4.11

WHICH METHOD IS MOST SUITABLE FOR TRAINING?

suitable
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Step by step 17 34.0 34.0 34.0
instruction
Coaching/lecture 18 36.0 36.0 70.0
Conference/Discussi 8 16.0 16.0 86.0
Valid
ons
Programmed 7 14.0 14.0 100.0
instruction
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that technique is most suitable for training of 34 % of the
respondent are says that Step by step instruction , 36 % of the respondent are says that
Coaching/lecture , 16 % of the respondent are says that Conference/Discussions, 14 % of the
respondent are says that Programmed instruction.
CHART 4.11

WHICH METHOD IS MOST SUITABLE FOR TRAINING?

TABLE 4.12

DO YOU EXPERIENCE FRUITFUL CHANGES IN WORKING EFFICIENCY AFTER

BEING TRAINED
 efficiency
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Yes 23 46.0 46.0 46.0
Valid No 27 54.0 54.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that experience fruitful changes in working efficiency after
being trained 46 % of the respondent are says that yes and 54% of the respondent are says that
no.
CHART 4.12

DO YOU EXPERIENCE FRUITFUL CHANGES IN WORKING EFFICIENCY AFTER

BEING TRAINED
TABLE 4.13

DOES TRAINING IMPROVE PERFORMANCE?

performance
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Yes 26 52.0 52.0 52.0
Valid No 24 48.0 48.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that training improve performance is 52 % of the respondent
are says that yes and 48 % of the respondent are says that no.
CHART 4.13

DOES TRAINING IMPROVE PERFORMANCE?

TABLE 4.14

THE TRAINING IS PROVIDED FOR SHORT DURATION OR LONG DURATION

duration
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Short 26 52.0 52.0 52.0
Valid Long 24 48.0 48.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The above table it can be observed that is 52 % of the respondent are says that The training is
provided for short duration and 48 % of the respondent are says that The training is provided
for long duration.

CHART 4.14

THE TRAINING IS PROVIDED FOR SHORT DURATION OR LONG DURATION

FINDING:
The above table 4.1 find cthat the gender of the respondent are 52% of the respondent
is male and 48% of the respondent is female.

The above table 4.2 find that the age of the respondent are 30 % of the respondent is
age group is below 30 years , 38 % of the respondent is age group is 30-40 years and
16% of the respondent is age group is 40-50 years, 30 % of the respondent is age group
is above years.

The above table 4.3 find that the maritial status of the respondent are 50 % of the
respondent is married , 50 % of the respondent is unmarried
 The above table4.4 find that the education qualification of the respondent are 26 % of
the respondent is completed sslc , 40 % of the respondent is completed hsc , ,16 % of
the respondent is completed graduate , 16 % of the respondent is completed as post
graduate.
The above tableb4.5 find that the experience of the respondent are 24 % of the
respondent are experience is 0-1 years , 42 % of the respondent is 1-2 years experience ,
,16 % of the respondent is 2-3 years experience , 18 % of the respondent is above 3
years experience .
The above table 4.6 find that attend the training program of the respondent are 48% of
the respondent are says that attend the training program and 52 % of the respondent are
says that not attend the training program .
The above table4.7 find that training is necessary for any employee for developing his
skills of the respondent are 52 % of the respondent are says that yes and 52 % of the
respondent are says that no.
The above table 4.8 find that training is organized of the respondent are 26 % of the
respondent are says that training is organized quarterly, 36 % of the respondent are says
that training is organized Half yearly, 20 % of the respondent are says that training is
organized Annually, 18 % of the respondent are says that training is organized Every 2
years. ,
The above table 4.9 find that years training is being provided of the respondent are 36 %
of the respondent are says that 0-5 years training is being provided, 44% of the
respondent are says that 5-10 year training is being provided, 20 % of the respondent are
says that 10-15 years.
The above table4.10 find that technique is most suitable for training of the respondent
are 34 % of the respondent are says that on the jop training , 44% of the respondent are
says that 5-10 year of the job training , 22 % of the respondent are says that depends on
need,
The above table4.11 find that technique is most suitable for training of 34 % of the
respondent are says that Step by step instruction , 36 % of the respondent are says that
Coaching/lecture , 16 % of the respondent are says that Conference/Discussions, 14 % of
the respondent are says that Programmed instruction.
 The above table4.12 find that experience fruitful changes in working efficiency after
being trained 46 % of the respondent are says that yes and 54% of the respondent are
says that no.
The above table 4.13 find that training improve performance is 52 % of the respondent
are says that yes and 48 % of the respondent are says that no.
The above table 4.14 find that is 52 % of the respondent are says that The training is
provided for short duration and 48 % of the respondent are says that The training is
provided for long duration