Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MIS - Desalter Case Study
MIS - Desalter Case Study
MIS - Desalter Case Study
Within many refineries there is a growing When applied to the relatively dirty service experienced
within a desalter a number of existing interface control
tendency to process heavier crudes or instruments have been found to demonstrate many
blend these with lighter feed stocks. shortcomings. Upon a request by a major oil refiner,
During crude oil refining, it is Tracerco redesigned its TRACERCO ProfilerTM instrument
that is commonly used in three phase separation devices
advantageous to optimise the blend to within the upstream oil and gas industry to withstand the
reduce overall feedstock costs whilst at the elevated operating temperatures typically experienced
within a desalter vessel.
same time ensuring the final mix can be
This case study offers information on the development and
adequately processed with minimal upset. application of a profiling instrument that provides vertical
real time phase density measurement in desalter vessels.
One fundamental need within a refinery process is the
It allows the position and extent of oil, emulsion, water and
efficient separation of wastewater from crude feedstock
solids to be measured.
using a desalter vessel after water washing the material
to reduce chloride levels and suspended solids. In order to
optimise this separation requirement, appropriate vessel
and internals design must be used alongside reliable level
and interface instrumentation.
Figure 1: General arrangement - Internally mounted source Figure 2: Rag layer presence resulting in Guided Wave Radar signal loss
Conventional Radiation Instruments However, if in the case of an interface where the two
Conventional nucleonic interface gauges use a radioactive phases are difficult to separate and hence an emulsion
source or sources, that are mounted internally using a band (rag layer) is formed, the system will continue to
sealed dip-pipe that looks similar to a thermo-well. The measure bulk density at the detector.
radioactive source is located at the end of the dip-pipe Using its calibration algorithm the instrument will offer an
inside the vessel. Figure 1 shows a typical arrangement. interface point. This point will be based upon the average
One or more radioactive sources are located within a density position between phases and will not take into
sealed dip-pipe inside the vessel. When the source beam consideration the upper and lower parts of the interface
shines through the phase of lower density, the signal gradient. In a worst case situation, if an emulsion band
intensity at the external detector is high. When the more spreads to a position greater than the vertical
dense material phase increases through the vessel the measurement width of the detector, the system will
radiation intensity at the detector is reduced. Through continue to select an interface position using the 50% bulk
calibration of the system using the densities of both fluids density reading. This will occur even though the lower
involved, the interface position within the vessel can be phase is mixed and present above the average interface
measured and controlled. measurement range and the upper phase is mixed and
present below the average measurement point.
Figure 3: Views of Density Profiler in a Desalter Vessel Figure 4: Detail of single source and single detector
Density Profiling Technology A narrow dip-pipe holds an array of low energy gamma
Density profiling technology can define all fluids inside a emitters. The other dip-pipes hold a vertical array of up
separation vessel to a greater degree than conventional to 150 radiation sensors. Each sensor is matched to the
instruments. It measures the density and extent of different radiation source on the same plane as shown in figure 4.
phases within a vessel. It maps different densities of On the screen the fluid density at each vertical point is
materials such as gases, liquids and interface spans depicted.
between phases. These materials can be separated into Principle of Operation
different user variable density bands or phases. The
interface of the various phases can then be calculated with Radioactive level measurement methods are normally
respect to the vessel height. based on absorption of radiation. The absorption principle
utilises the reduction in radiation passing through the
In place of traditional single point measurements for interface process material with increasing mass density. The
and bulk level, an operator can measure the position of each difference in the absorption coefficient for radioactive
phase in real time and determine the quality of each interface. materials between oil, water and solids is sufficiently
This level of measurement gives the operator confidence to large to detect interface levels. Ion sensors detect the
increase fluid throughput and minimise the use of various radiation passing through the process material. An ion
separation enhancement chemicals. sensor is a gas ionisation detector. An electric field is
The information provided can also be used to applied between two electrodes in a gas (e.g. argon) filled
automatically control interface levels in a DCS system and tube. The radioactive signal produces an ionisation
influence the injection of effect chemicals. process in the gas and because of the electric field the
A density profiler is housed in dip-pipes (sealed pockets free electrons and positive ions produce an electric
similar to thermo-wells) installed within the vessel through current that is proportional to the amount of radiation.
a single flange as shown in figure 3.
Materials of Construction The material between the two dip-pipes will attenuate the
Due to its density, titanium was chosen for the dip-pipes radiation and so the intensity of radiation seen by a
as it is relatively transparent to the low energy radiation radiation sensor is related to the density of the intervening
emitted from the sources. If steel dip-pipes were used the material. Each sensor produces a train of voltage pulses
radiation employed would require a higher energy source. as its output signal. The rate at which these pulses are
This high energy radiation is less sensitive to density produced is directly proportional to the intensity of the
changes. This would make it necessary to employ a much radiation incident on the sensor that is determined by the
larger source to detector separation, in the region of density of the process fluid at the sensor elevation.
500mm between the dip-pipes, i.e. more than one vessel Pulses from the radiation sensor are counted in the signal
nozzle would be required. In addition, because radiation processor unit mounted above the dip-pipe assembly.
from a higher energy source is difficult to shield, the beam The count period is user selectable so that the random
from each source would appear as a patch covering about nature of the radiation pulses can be smoothed out.These
150mm vertical length on the detector assembly. This counts are transmitted for analysis via a fibre optic link and
would mean that vertical resolution would be at least a converter to a PLC that collects the information and
150mm for a higher energy source based profiler calculates the density of the material for each individual
compared with 30mm for lower energy emitting devices. radiation sensor. Thus, a density profile of the vessel can
It is the use of low density, high strength titanium for the be achieved. Density bands are allocated for each of the
dip-pipes that make it possible to use low energy sources different phases, the top level of these phases can then
in the profiler. Lower energy sources are much easier to be calculated with respect to vessel or instrument height.
shield, allowing a much smaller source/detector distance, These heights and phase band thickness can then be
which allows a single nozzle on the vessel and allows used for control loop process variables. Instrument set
much improved vertical resolution, and hence provides a up is shown in figure 5.
better density profile.
Contact Us:
Tel: +44 (0)1642 375500 Email: tracerco@tracerco.com For more information on
For your local representative please visit our website: The TRACERCO Profiler TM
Tracerco Limited is a subsidiary of Johnson Matthey PLC, 5th Floor, 25 Farringdon Street, London EC4A 4AB.
Registered in England No. 4496566. Tracerco is a trading name of Tracerco Limited.
TRACERCO, The TRACERCO Profiler, Johnson Matthey and the Johnson Matthey logo are trademarks of
the Johnson Matthey Group of companies.
XM0564/0/A