Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LVTHS Cac Nhan To Anh Huong Den Thoa Man Cong Viec Cua NVVP PDF
LVTHS Cac Nhan To Anh Huong Den Thoa Man Cong Viec Cua NVVP PDF
Chu vn Ton
CC NHN T NH HNG N
S THA MN CNG VIC CA
NHN VIN KHI VN PHNG TP.HCM
Li cam oan
Chu Vn Ton
ii
Li cm n
Tm tt lun vn
Mc lc
1.1. t vn ................................................................................................................... 1
1.2. Mc tiu nghin cu ................................................................................................... 2
1.3. i tng v phm vi nghin cu .............................................................................. 2
1.4. Phng php nghin cu ............................................................................................ 3
1.5. ngha ti.............................................................................................................. 4
1.6. Cu trc ca lun vn.................................................................................................. 5
CHNG 2: C S L THUYT ...................................................................................... 6
2.1. Gii thiu .................................................................................................................... 6
2.2. L thuyt v s tha mn cng vic ........................................................................... 6
2.2.1. Khi nim............................................................................................................. 6
2.2.2. L thuyt v s tha mn cng vic .................................................................... 8
2.2.2.1. Thuyt nhu cu cp bc ca Maslow (1943) ................................................ 8
2.2.2.2. Thuyt ERG ca Alderfer (1969) ................................................................. 9
2.2.2.3. Thuyt thnh tu ca McClelland (1988)................................................... 10
2.2.2.4. Thuyt hai nhn t ca Herzberg (1959) .................................................... 10
2.2.2.5. Thuyt cng bng ca Adam (1963)........................................................... 11
2.2.2.6. Thuyt k vng ca Vroom (1964)............................................................. 12
2.2.2.7. M hnh c im cng vic ca Hackman & Oldham (1974) .................. 13
2.2.2.8. Cc nguyn nhn dn n s tha mn trong cng vic............................. 14
2.3. Cc nghin cu lin quan n s tha mn cng vic .............................................. 16
2.4. M hnh nghin cu v ch s nh gi cc nhn t ca s tha mn cng
vic ............................................................................................................................ 21
2.4.1. nh ngha cc nhn t ...................................................................................... 22
2.4.2. M hnh nghin cu........................................................................................... 25
2.4.3. Ch s nh gi cc nhn t ca s tha mn cng vic.................................... 26
2.5. Tm tt ...................................................................................................................... 27
CHNG 3: PHNG PHP NGHIN CU................................................................. 28
U
Danh mc ph lc ................................................................................................................ 79
vii
Danh mc cc hnh v, th
Hnh 2.1 Cc cp bc ca nhu cu Maslow ...........................................................................8
Hnh 2.2 Thuyt ERG ca Alderfer .......................................................................................9
Hnh 2.3 Thuyt hai nhn t ca Herzberg..........................................................................11
Hnh 2.4 Thuyt k vng ca Victor Vroom .......................................................................13
Hnh 2.5 M hnh c im cng vic ca Hackman & Oldham........................................14
Hnh 2.6 M hnh hi quy tuyn tnh ban u .....................................................................26
Hnh 4.1 Mu phn chia theo gii tnh ................................................................................41
Hnh 4.2 Mu phn chia theo tui...................................................................................41
Hnh 4.3 Mu phn chia theo thi gian cng tc .................................................................42
Hnh 4.4 Mu phn chia theo trnh .................................................................................42
Hnh 4.5 Mu phn chia theo chc danh cng vic.............................................................43
Hnh 4.6 Mu phn chia theo loi hnh doanh nghip .........................................................43
Hnh 4.7 M hnh hi quy tuyn tnh c iu chnh ...................................................56
Chng 1 M u 1
CHNG 1: M U
1.1. t vn
Cng vi s pht trin ca nn kinh t Vit Nam trong nhng nm gn y, nhu cu
v ngun nhn lc cng ngy cng gia tng. Doanh nghip ngy cng ch trng hn
vn xy dng ngun nhn lc, nht l tuyn chn ng ngi cho cng ty mnh.
Tuy nhin, chn c ng ngi mnh cn l cha , doanh nghip cn phi
bit cch gi chn nhn vin ca mnh nht l nhng nhn vin nng ct, gi vai tr
ch cht trong cng ty. Vi s thiu ht ngun nhn lc c nng lc nh hin nay,
vic gi chn nhn vin gii tr thnh vn c cc ch doanh nghip ht sc
quan tm.
S n nh trong i ng nhn vin s gip doanh nghip tit kim c thi gian
v chi ph (tuyn dng, o to, v.v.), gim cc sai st (do nhn vin mi gy ra khi
cha quen vi cng vic mi), to nim tin v tinh thn on kt trong ni b doanh
nghip. T nhn vin s xem doanh nghip l ni l tng cho h pht huy nng
lc ca mnh cng nh gn b lu di vi doanh nghip. Cui cng quan trng hn
ht, s n nh ny s gip doanh nghip hot ng hiu qu hn, to c s tin
cy ca khch hng v cht lng sn phm v dch v ca doanh nghip.
- Th ba, so snh s tha mn cng vic gia nhn vin vn phng c s khc nhau
v gii tnh, tui, thi gian cng tc, trnh hc vn, v tr cng vic v loi
hnh doanh nghip h ang cng tc.
Lun vn s dng thng k suy din phn tch kt qu thu thp c t mu.
Cronbachs alpha c dng la chn v cng c thnh phn ca ca thang o,
phn tch nhn t EFA c dng xc nh cc nhn t n cha ng sau cc
bin s c quan st. So snh trung bnh ca cc tng th con chia theo c im
khc nhau ca tng th cho php suy lun s ging v khc nhau gia cc tp tng
th con c quan tm. Cui cng phn tch hi quy tuyn tnh c s dng xc
nh cc nhn t thc s c nh hng n s tha mn cng vic cng nh h s
ca cc nhn t ny trong phng trnh hi quy tuyn tnh.
1.5. ngha ti
ti c mt s ngha sau:
CHNG 2: C S L THUYT
cng vic cc kha cnh khc nhau lin quan n cng vic. ng cng cho rng s
tha mn cng vic ni chung khng phi ch n thun l tng cng s tha mn
ca cc kha cnh khc nhau, m s tha mn cng vic ni chung c th c xem
nh mt bin ring.
Theo Spector (1997) s tha mn cng vic n gin l vic ngi ta cm thy
thch cng vic ca h v cc kha cnh cng vic ca h nh th no. V n l s
nh gi chung, nn n l mt bin v thi . Cn Ellickson v Logsdon (2001) th
cho rng s tha mn cng vic c nh ngha chung l mc ngi nhn vin
yu thch cng vic ca h, l thi da trn s nhn thc ca ngi nhn vin
(tch cc hay tiu cc) v cng vic hoc mi trng lm vic ca h. Ni n gin
hn, mi trng lm vic cng p ng c cc nhu cu, gi tr v tnh cch ca
ngi lao ng th tha mn cng vic cng cao.
T
th hin
T trng
X hi
An ton
Sinh l
Nhu cu
lin i
Nhu cu Nhu cu
tn ti pht trin
- Nhu cu v quyn lc l nhu cu khin ngi khc c x theo cch h mong mun.
Nhn vin
Nhn t ng vin
Nhn t duy tr
J. Stacey Adams cho rng nhn vin c xu hng nh gi s cng bng bng cch
so snh cng sc h b ra so vi nhng th h nhn c cng nh so snh t l
ca h vi t l ca nhng ng nghip trong cng ty. Nu kt qu ca s so
snh l s ngang bng nhau tc cng bng th h s tip tc duy tr n lc v
hiu sut lm vic ca mnh. Nu th lao nhn c vt qu mong i ca h, h
s c xu hng gia tng cng sc ca h trong cng vic, ngc li nu th lao h
nhn c thp hn so vi ng gp ca h, h s c xu hng gim bt n lc
Chng 2: C s l thuyt 12
hoc tm cc gii php khc nh vng mt trong gi lm vic hoc thi vic
(Pattanayak, 2005).
Vroom cho rng hnh vi v ng c lm vic ca con ngi khng nht thit c
quyt nh bi hin thc m n c quyt nh bi nhn thc ca con ngi v
nhng k vng ca h trong tng lai. Khc vi Maslow v Herzberg, Vroom
khng tp trung vo nhu cu ca con ngi m tp trung vo kt qu. L thuyt ny
xoay quanh ba khi nim c bn (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2007) hay ba mi quan h
(Robbins, 2002 ):
Vroom cho rng ngi nhn vin ch c ng vin khi nhn thc ca h v c ba
khi nim hay ba mi quan h trn l tch cc. Ni cc khc l khi h tin rng n
lc ca h s cho ra kt qu tt hn, kt qu s dn n phn thng xng ng
v phn thng c ngha v ph hp vi mc tiu c nhn ca h.
Chng 2: C s l thuyt 13
nht nh nhm to cho nhn vin cm nhn c trch nhim v kt qu cng vic
ca mnh. Cui cng, cng vic phi m bo c tnh phn hi t cp trn, ghi nhn
thnh tu ca nhn vin cng nh nhng gp , ph bnh nhm gip nhn vin lm
vic tt hn ln sau. N gip nhn vin bit c kt qu thc s ca cng vic
mnh lm.
- ng lc lm vic ni ti cao
Tri nghim trch - Hiu sut cng vic cao
- Quyn quyt nh nhim i vi kt qu - S tha mn cng vic cao
cng vic - Ngh vic v thi vic thp
Nhn thc v kt qu
- Phn hi thc s ca cng vic
Theo Kreitner & Kinicki (2007) v Alam & Kamal (2006) c nm nguyn nhn dn
n tha mn cng vic. Th nht l s p ng v cc nhu cu. Cc nhu cu ny
Chng 2: C s l thuyt 15
Boeve (2007) tin hnh cuc nghin cu s tha mn cng vic ca cc ging
vin khoa o to tr l bc s cc trng y ti M trn c s s dng l thuyt
hai nhn t ca Herzberg v ch s m t cng vic ca Smith, Kendall & Hulin.
Theo , nhn t s tha mn cng vic c chia lm hai nhm: nhm nhn t ni
ti gm bn cht cng vic v c hi pht trin thng tin v nhm nhn t bn
ngoi gm lng, s h tr ca cp trn v mi quan h vi ng nghip. Mc ch
ca nghin cu ny l kim nh tnh ng n ca c hai l thuyt trn. Trong
nghin cu ny ca Boeve, cc thng k mang tnh nh lng c p dng nh
h s alpha ca Cronbach, h s tng quan Spearman v hi quy tuyn tnh.
chc, cm gic v thi gian rnh vic v nh mun b vic) nh hng nhiu n
s tha mn cng vic.
Vit Nam, TS. Trn Kim Dung (2005) thc hin nghin cu o lng mc
tha mn cng vic trong iu kin ca Vit Nam bng cch s dng Ch s m t
cng vic (JDI) ca Smith v ng nghip. Tuy nhin, ngoi nm nhn t c
ngh trong JDI, tc gi a thm hai nhn t na l phc li cng ty v iu kin
lm vic ph hp vi tnh hnh c th ca Vit Nam. Mc tiu chnh ca nghin
Chng 2: C s l thuyt 21
Thang o Likert by mc , phn tch nhn t (EFA) v phn tch nhn t khng
nh (CFA) c s dng. Mt nhc im ca nghin cu ny l c im ca
mu nghin cu, i tng tr li bng cu hi nghin cu l nhn vin ang thc
hin cc kha hc bui ti ti trng i hc Kinh t TP.HCM. H c nh gi
l nhng ngi c nh hng hc hnh ln nh hng v tng li nhiu hn, h
cng c nh gi l ngi c nhu cu phi vt cht cao hn nhu cu vt cht. Kt
qu cng cho thy nhn t bn cht cng vic v c hi c o to thng tin
c nh gi l quan trng nht i vi s tha mn cng vic ca i tng kho
st. Do vy kt qu nghin cu c th phn nh cha ng thi ca ton b nhn
vin ti TP. HCM cng nh ti Vit Nam.
+ Thu nhp
+ o to v thng tin
+ Cp trn
+ ng nghip
+ c im cng vic
+ iu kin lm vic
+ Phc li cng ty
Thu nhp (Income): l s tin m c nhn, t chc, khu vc, quc gia, v.v. c c
t vic lm, t vic u t, t vic kinh doanh, v.v. Trong ng ngha ca ti
nghin cu ny th thu nhp l s tin m c nhn c c t vic lm cng cho mt
doanh nghip, t chc no , thu nhp ny khng bao gm cc khon thu nhp khi
h lm cng vic khc (khng lin quan n doanh nghip, t chc h ang lm
thu). Theo , khon thu nhp ny s bao gm cc khon lng c bn, cc khon
Chng 2: C s l thuyt 23
o to v thng tin
Vit Nam, cc phc li m ngi nhn vin quan tm nht bao gm bo him x
hi, bo him y t, c ngh php theo lut nh, c ngh bnh v vic ring khi
c nhu cu, c cng on bo v li ch hp php ca nhn vin, c i du lch
hng nm, c lm n nh lu di ti cng ty (khng s mt vic), c cng ty
h tr mua nh, c quyn mua c phn cng ty vi gi u i, v.v.
Thu nhp
o to v thng tin
Cp trn
S tha mn cng vic
ng nghip
c im cng vic
iu kin lm vic
Phc li
Nhn t Ch s cu thnh
Cng vic s dng nhiu k nng
Hiu r cng vic
Tm quan trng ca cng vic
c im cng vic
Quyn quyt nh trong cng vic
S phn hi v gp ca cp trn
Cng vic ph hp vi nng lc
Thi gian lm vic
Lm thm gi
iu kin lm vic Phng tin, my mc thit b cho cng vic y
Ni lm vic an ton thoi mi
Thi gian i li t nh n c quan
Bo him x hi, bo him y t
Ngh php, ngh bnh
Du lch ngh dng
Phc li cng ty
H tr ca cng on
S m bo ca cng vic
Phc li khc
2.5. Tm tt
T cc l thuyt v s tha mn cng vic, cc nghin cu lin quan n s tha
mn cng vic m hnh hi qui tuyn tnh ban u c xy dng vi bin ph
thuc l s tha mn cng vic ca nhn vin vn phng ti TP.HCM cn by bin
c lp ln lt l s tha mn i vi thu nhp, s tha mn i vi o to thng
tin, s tha mn i vi cp trn, s tha mn i vi ng nghip, s tha mn
i vi c im cng vic, s tha mn i vi iu kin lm vic v s tha mn
i vi phc li cng ty. T cc nh ngha v cc nhn t ca s tha mn cng
vic cng vi cc nghin cu lin quan, ta cng xy dng c tng cng 37 ch s
(kha cnh/ bin quan st) cu thnh o lng s tha mn tng nhn t nh
hng n s tha mn cng vic.
Chng 3: Phng php nghin cu 28
Tip theo hai chng trc, chng ny s gii thiu v phng php nghin cu
vi hai phn l thit k nghin cu v k thut phn tch d liu thng k. Phn thit
k nghin cu s gii thiu v cch xy dng thang o, cch thc chn mu, cng
c thu thp thng tin kho st v qu trnh tin hnh thu thp thng tin. Phn k
thut phn tch d liu thng k s gii thiu cch thc kim nh tin cy ca
thang o bng xc nh cronbachs alpha, phn tch nhn t, thng k suy din vi
kim nh s bng nhau ca cc tng th con v phn tch hi quy tuyn tnh.
Cng vic tip theo l xc nh mu cho nghin cu ny. Phng php chn mu
phi xc sut thun tin c s dng vi quy m mu l khong 200 nh c
trnh by phn Chn mu ca chng ny.
Bc tip theo l la chn cng c thu thp thng tin cn nghin cu. Bng cu
hi t tr li c s dng thu thp thng tin. Ni dung cc cu hi trong bng
cu hi c trnh by phn Cng c thu thp thng tin Bng cu hi ca
chng ny.
Chng 3: Phng php nghin cu 29
Sau y, chng ta s xem xt chi tit cch la chn thang o, chn mu, chn cng
c thu thp thng tin v qu trnh thu thp thng tin v x l s liu thng k.
3.1.1. Thang o
3.1.2. Chn mu
3.1.2.1. Tng th
Theo Cooper v Schindler (1998), l do quan trng khin ngi ta s dng phng
php chn mu phi xc sut l tnh tit kim v chi ph v thi gian. V mt ny th
phng php chn mu phi xc sut vt tri so vi chn mu xc sut. Ngoi ra,
hai tc gi cng nhc nh rng chn mu xc sut khng phi lc no cng m bo
tnh chnh xc v trong mt s trng hp chn mu xc sut l khng th thc hin
c. Tuy nhin hai tc gi ny cng khng nh nhc im ln nht ca phng
php chn mu phi xc sut l s ch quan thin v trong qu trnh chn mu v s
lm mo m bin dng kt qu nghin cu. Gio s Tin s Nguyn Th Cnh (2007)
cho rng chn mu phi xc sut l d phc tho v thc hin nhng n c th cho
kt qu sai lch bt chp s phn on ca chng ta, do ngu nhin nn c th
chng khng i din cho tng th.
Chng 3: Phng php nghin cu 33
- T l tr li i vi cc bng cu hi l kh thp;
Sau khi xem xt nhu cu thu thp thng tin, nhng im mnh v im yu ca
cng c ny cng nh cng c thu thp thng tin m cc nghin cu lin quan s
dng, bng cu hi t tr li c thit k v s dng thu thp thng tin cn
Chng 3: Phng php nghin cu 35
Ngi tr li sau khi hon tt phn tr li bng cu hi trn Forms Google Docs
ch cn nhn nt Gi l thng tin tr li s c lu tr trn mng. Sau khi s
ngi tr li (kch thc mu) cn thit, bng cu hi c ng li v vic thu thp
thng tin kt thc.
Cronbachs alpha s kim tra tin cy ca cc bin dng o lng tng nhn t
ca s tha mn cng vic. Nhng bin khng m bo tin cy s b loi khi
thang o v s khng xut hin phn phn tch nhn t.
CHNG 4: KT QU NGHIN CU
Tip theo chng Phng php nghin cu, chng ny s gii thiu v cc kt qu
nghin cu thng qua vic x l, phn tch d liu thu thp c. Nh trnh by
chng trc, kt qu nghin cu c gii thiu chng ny s gm ba phn
l m t mu, phn tch tin cy v ph hp ca thang o v thng k suy din.
Tuy nhin, trc khi c th x l cc d liu bng phn mm ng dng th cc d
liu thu thp cn c lc li, lm sch v m ha.
4.1.3. M ha d liu
4.2. M t mu
4.2.1. Kt cu mu theo cc c im
Nam
38.1%
N
61.9%
120
100
80
S ngi
60 114
40
50
20 27
14
0
tui 22-24 tui 25-29 tui 30-34 tui 35 tr
ln
tui
tng ng l 29.3%, 39.5% v 31.2%. iu ny cng cho thy t l ngi tham gia
kho st ny c thi gian cng tc di 1 nm l kh cao.
90
80
70
60
S ngi
50
81
40
60 64
30
20
10
0
Di 1 nm T 1-3 nm Trn 3 nm
Thi gian cng tc
160
140
120
100
S ngi
80 158
60
40
20 26
6 15
0
T trung Cao ng i hc Sau i
hc tr hc
xung
Trnh
140
120
100
S ngi
80
123
60
40
45
20 33
4
0
1 2 3 4
Chc danh
1. Nhn vin tc nghip
2. Trng nhm/ trng i
3. Trng ph phng/ k ton trng
4. Gim c/ Ph gim c/ Tng gim c/ Ph tng gim c
Cui cng, xt theo loi hnh doanh nghip mu nghin cu c s ngi lm cho
cng ty c phn v doanh nghip nc ngoi bng nhau l 60 ngi, cng ty trch
nhim hu hn c 40 ngi, cng ty nh nc c 22 ngi, cn li l nhng ngi
lm cho doanh nghip t nhn, cng ty lin doanh, v loi hnh doanh nghip khc.
Doanh nghip
nc ngoi
29% C phn
29%
Doanh nghip t
nhn Trch nhim hu
4% hn
20%
Sau phn tch tin cy Cronbachs s l phn tch nhn t. Theo Hair et al. (1998,
c trch bi Garson, n.d) th h s ti nhn t trn 0.6 c xem l cao v di
0.4 l thp. i vi nghin cu ny nhng bin no c h s ti nhn t nh hn 0.5
s b loi m bo tnh hon chnh (validity) ca thang o. Phng php trch
(extraction method) c s dng l phn tch nhn t chnh (principal component
analysis) v phng php quay quanh trc ta (orthogonal rotation method) l
Varimax with Kaiser Normalization (chun Kaiser).
N i =1 Yi
N 2
= 1
N 1 X2 (4.1)
Trong :
N: l s bin a vo phn tch.
Y2
i
: phng sai ca bin quan st th i.
Phn tch nhn t thng c dng trong qu trnh xy dng thang o lng cc
kha cnh khc nhau ca khi nim nghin cu, kim tra tnh n kha cnh ca
thang o lng (Hong Trng & Chu Nguyn Mng Ngc, 2005). Nh vy, phn
tch nhn t va gip ta rt gn tp hp nhiu bin thnh mt s bin tng i t
ng thi kim tra kt dnh hay tin cy ca cc bin trong cng mt thang o.
Sau khi cc bin ca nhn t iu kin lm vic b loi khi thang o, phn tch
nhn t c tin hnh. Nh vy, t s bin quan st ban u l 37 bin, nay ta ch
cn li 32 bin. Mong i ca chng trc khi tin hnh phn tch nhn t ny l 32
bin ny s c rt gn thnh 6 nhn t l s tha mn i vi thu nhp, o to
thng tin, cp trn, ng nghip, c im cng vic v phc li cng ty.
Cng nh cc phng php phn tch thng k khc, trc khi tin hnh phn tch
nhn t, ta cng cn kim tra xem vic dng phng php ny c ph hp hay
khng. Vic kim tra ny s c thc hin bi vic tnh h s KMO and Bartletts
Test. Tr s ca KMO trong trng hp ny kh ln t 0.877 v Sig. ca Bartletts
Chng 4: Kt qu nghin cu 49
Test nh hn 1/1000 cho thy 32 bin ny c tng quan vi nhau v hon ton ph
hp vi phn tch nhn t. Bartletts Test dng kim nh gi thuyt Ho l cc
bin khng c tng quan vi nhau trong tng th cn KMO dng kim tra xem
vi kch thc mu ta c c c ph hp vi phn tch nhn t hay khng. Theo
Hong Trng & Chu Nguyn Mng Ngc (2005), gi tr KMO nm gia 0.5 n 1
c ngha l phn tch nhn t l thch hp.
Phng php trch trong phn tch nhn t ca nghin cu ny l phn tch nhn t
chnh (Principal component analysis) vi gi tr trch Eigenvalue ln hn 1. iu
ny c ngha l ch nhng nhn t c trch ra c gi tr Eigenvalue ln hn 1 mi
c gi li trong m hnh phn tch.
Sau khi xoay cc nhn t s tp trung ca cc bin theo tng nhn t hin r rng.
Trong nhn t u tin l ton b cc bin thuc nhn t s tha mn i vi cp
trn. Nhn t th hai l ton b cc bin thuc nhn t s tha mn i vi ng
nghip. Nhn t th ba l cc bin thuc nhn t s tha mn i vi c im cng
vic, ngoi tr bin nhn c phn hi t cp trn. Bin ny c h s ti nhn t
ln hn 0.5 nhn t th nht, do n s c a vo nhn t ny. Nhn t th
Chng 4: Kt qu nghin cu 50
Sau khi loi bin khng s mt vic ra khi phn tch nhn t, kt qu cng cho
ra by nhn t nh trn, nhng lc ny cc h s ti nhn t sau khi xoay c
ci thin so vi lc cn c bin khng s mt vic. Kh nng gii thch ca by
nhn t ny c ci thin ln 65.471%.
Kt qu cui cng sau khi loi cc bin khng ph hp phn phn tch nhn t, ta
cn li 31 bin trong thang o v c chia lm by nhn t vi tn gi tng ng
vi su nhn t ca s tha mn cng vic ta xy dng ban u (nhn t iu
kin lm vic b loi v nhn t phc li c chia lm hai). By nhn t gm
s tha mn i vi thu nhp, o to thng tin, cp trn, ng nghip, c im
cng vic, phc li c bn v phc li cng thm.
Trong :
Fi : nhn t th i c gii thch bi 31 bin quan st.
Wik: nhn s ca bin th k khi gii thch nhn t th i.
Xk: bin th k.
Chng 4: Kt qu nghin cu 51
Nh vy, sau phn phn tch nhn t ny, ta s chn ra c 6 nhn t nh hng
n s tha mn cng vic, l s tha mn i vi thu nhp, o to thng tin,
cp trn, c im cng vic, iu kin lm vic v phc li cng ty.
kim nh xem s tha mn cng vic gia nam v n c khc nhau khng,
kim nh theo phng php Independent samples T-Test v phng php phi tham
s 2-samples Mann-Whitney Test c s dng. Hai phng php ny u cho
ra kt lun ging nhau.
Levene test cng c tin hnh trc kim nh xem phng sai ca s tha
mn cng vic ca tng nhm tui c phn phi chun hay khng. Kt qu sig.
bng 0.448 ngha l cc phng sai ny c phn phi chun. iu ny s gip tng
kh nng chnh xc ca kim nh ANOVA hn v v mt trc quan ta d dng thy
rng vic so snh cc tng th c gi tr trung bnh bng nhau nhng phn tn
(c th qua phng sai) li hon ton khc nhau l khp khing. Vi sig. l 0.149
v tin cy 95% chng ta khng c s bc b gi thuyt khng c s khc
nhau v s tha mn cng vic ca nhn vin thuc cc nhm tui khc nhau.
Kim nh v s bng nhau ca phng sai bng Levene Test cng c thc hin
trc khi phn tch ANOVA i vi s tha mn cng vic gia cc nhm nhn
vin c thi gian gn b vi cng ty khc nhau. Sig. ca Levene Test l 0.372 cho
thy phng sai ca cc nhm l bng nhau. Kt qu sig. ca ANOVA bng 0.031
cho thy vi tin cy 95% th c s khc bit v s tha mn cng vic gia
nhng nhm nhn vin c thi gian lm vic khc nhau.
gn bng nhau t khong 3.4, ring ch c nhm nhn vin c thi gian cng tc
trn 3 nm l c s tha mn cng vic thp hn ng k so vi hai nhm trn, t
im trung bnh ch c 3.13. Do , ta s tin hnh so snh s tha mn cng vic
ca nhn vin c thi gian cng tc trn 3 nm so vi nhng nhn vin c thi gian
cng tc di 1 nm v t 1-3 nm, xem c thc s tn ti s khc bit ny.
Kim nh Dunnett Test s gip ta thc hin vic ny. Kt qu cho thy vi tin
cy 95% th ng l c s khc bit v s tha mn cng vic gia nhn vin c
thi gian cng tc trn 3 nm so vi nhn vin c thi gian lm vic t 1 3 nm.
Nu tin cy 90% th ta c th kt lun rng nhn vin c thi gian cng tc trn 3
nm c s tha mn cng vic khc so vi cc nhn vin thuc hai nhm cn li.
Nh vy, dng nh thi gian cng tc cng lu th s tha mn cng vic cng
gim xung.
4.4.5. S tha mn cng vic theo trnh , chc danh v loi hnh doanh
nghip
Cch kim nh s tha mn cng vic gia cc nhm chia theo trnh hc vn,
theo v tr chc danh v theo loi hnh doanh nghip cng ging nh trn, hai
phng php kim nh ANOVA v Kruskal-Wallis cng c s dng.
Cui cng, kt qu kim nh i vi s tha mn cng vic theo loi hnh doanh
nghip vi tin cy 95% cng cho kt qu khng c s kt lun rng nhn
vin vn phng TP.HCM lm vic cc doanh nghip thuc cc loi hnh khc
nhau c s tha mn cng vic khc nhau.
Thu nhp
o to v thng tin
Cp trn
S tha mn cng vic
c im cng vic
Phc li c bn
Phn tch hi quy tuyn tnh s gip chng ta bit c cng nh hng ca
cc bin c lp ln bin ph thuc. Phng php hi quy c s dng y l
phng php bnh phng b nht thng thng OLS vi bin ph thuc l s tha
mn cng vic cn bin c lp l cc bin th hin m hnh iu chnh trn.
Bc u tin khi phn tch hi quy tuyn tnh ta s xem xt cc mi quan h tng
quan tuyn tnh gia bin ph thuc v tng bin c lp, cng nh gia cc bin
Chng 4: Kt qu nghin cu 57
Kt qu bng h s tng quan cho thy bin ph thuc c mi quan h tng quan
tuyn tnh vi c su bin c lp, trong h s tng quan gia s tha mn cng
vic v s tha mn vi cp trn v thu nhp l ln nht, h s tng quan gia bin
ph thuc vi s tha mn i vi phc li c bn l thp nht, ch t 0.384. Kim
nh t-test v mi quan h gia bin ph thuc vi tng bin c lp cho thy c su
bin c lp trong m hnh hi quy u c quan h tuyn tnh vi bin ph thuc.
Tuy nhin gia cc bin c lp cng c tng quan vi nhau mc d h s tng
quan gia chng khng ln lm. Nhng ta cng khng phi qu bn tm v phn
kim nh a cng tuyn bn di s xc nh xem gia cc bin c gi li trong
m hnh hi quy tuyn tnh c xy ra hin tng a cng tuyn hay khng.
Bc tip theo ta tin hnh xy dng phng trnh hi quy tuyn tnh. Da vo c
s l thuyt v kt qu phn tch h s tng quan Pearson trn, ta s a tt c
cc bin c lp trong m hnh hi quy iu chnh bng phng php a vo
cng mt lc (Enter).
Tip theo l cn kim nh gi thuyt m hnh (phn tch phng sai) ca tng th.
trn sau khi nh gi gi tr R2 ta bit c m hnh hi quy tuyn tnh xy
dng l ph hp vi mu. Tuy nhin c th suy din m hnh ny thnh m hnh
ca tng th ta cn phi tin hnh kim nh F thng qua phn tch phng sai. Ta
c sig. ca F < 1/1000 nn ta c th bc b gi thuyt h s xc nh ca tng th
R2pop = 0. iu ny c ngha l c t nht mt bin c lp no nh hng n
bin ph thuc.
Phng trnh hi quy tuyn tnh trn gip ta rt ra kt lun t mu nghin cu rng
s tha mn cng vic ca nhn vin vn phng TP.HCM ph thuc vo su nhn
Chng 4: Kt qu nghin cu 59
M hnh hi quy tuyn tnh bng phng php OSL c thc hin vi mt s gi
nh v m hnh ch thc s c ngha khi cc gi nh ny c m bo. Do vy,
m bo cho tin cy ca m hnh, chng ta cn phi thc hin mt lot cc d
tm s vi phm cc gi nh cn thit trong hi quy tuyn tnh.
Cui cng, ta s xem xt s vi phm a cng tuyn ca m hnh. phn phn tch
h s tng quan trn, ta thy rng gia bin ph thuc c quan h tng quan
kh r vi cc bin c lp nhng ta cng thy c gia cc bin c lp cng c
tng quan vi nhau. iu ny s to ra kh nng a cng tuyn ca m hnh. V
vy, ta phi d tm hin tng a cng tuyn bng cch tnh chp nhn ca bin
(Tolerance) v h s phng i phng sai (Variance inflation factor VIF).
chp nhn trong trng hp ny ca bn bin trong m hnh kh cao, u ln hn
Chng 4: Kt qu nghin cu 61
Nh vy m hnh hi quy tuyn tnh c xy dng theo phng trnh (4.4) khng
vi phm cc gi nh cn thit trong hi quy tuyn tnh.
4.6. Tm tt kt qu nghin cu
Chng ny gii thiu cc kt qu nghin cu c c t vic x l v phn tch
s liu thu thp c. Trc tin, d liu c sn lc, lm sch v m ha trc
khi c th cho tin hnh x l v cho ra kt qu thng k suy din.
Cui cng, phn tch hi quy tuyn tnh c tin hnh vi phng php bnh
phng b nht thng thng OSL gip ta c c phng trnh hi quy tuyn
tnh cng nh cng nh hng ca cc nhn t i vi s tha mn cng vic.
Kt qu phn tch hi quy cho thy c ba nhn t c cng nh hng mnh n
s tha mn cng vic l s tha mn i vi thu nhp, cp trn v c im cng
vic. Ba nhn t cn li cng c nh hng n s tha mn cng vic nhng vi
cng nh hn nhiu.
Chng 5: Kt lun v kin ngh 63
Khi s tha mn c xt di tng nhn t ring bit th nhn vin vn phng tha
mn cao nht i vi iu kin lm vic. Tip n l tha mn i vi ng nghip,
c im cng vic, cp trn, phc li cng ty v thu nhp. Nhn t c s tha mn
thp nht l o to thng tin. Khi xt s tha mn theo tng kha cnh (bin quan
st) c th th hai kha cnh v bo him x hi, bo him y t v ngh bnh, ngh
php c mc tha mn cao nht trong khi kha cnh phc li khc c mc tha mn
thp nht. Kt qu ny cho thy cn nhiu iu ngi s dng lao ng c th lm
ci thin s tha mn i ca nhn vin vi thu nhp v o to thng tin.
Kt qu phn tch thng k cho thy vi tin cy 95% khng c s khc nhau v
s tha mn cng vic gia nhn vin nam v n, gia nhng nhn vin thuc cc
tui khc nhau, gia nhng nhn vin c trnh hc vn khc nhau, gia nhng
nhn vin c chc danh v tr cng vic khc nhau v gia nhng nhn vin lm
vic nhng cng ty thuc loi hnh doanh nghip khc nhau. Tuy nhin, nhn vin
c thi gian cng tc t 3 nm tr ln c s tha mn cng vic thp hn nhng
Chng 5: Kt lun v kin ngh 64
nhn vin c thi gian cng tc ngn hn. y l iu ngi s dng lao ng cn
lu .
Phn tch hi quy tuyn tnh bi bng phng php bnh phng b nht gip ta
xc nh cng ca su nhn t nh hng n s tha mn cng vic l s tha
mn i vi thu nhp, c im cng vic, cp trn, o to thng tin, phc li c
bn v phc li cng thm. Trong , s tha mn i vi thu nhp c tc ng ln
nht. K n l s tha mn i vi c im cng vic v cp trn. S tha mn
i vi o to thng tin, phc li c bn v phc li cng thm c cng nh
hng nh hn nhiu.
Chng 5: Kt lun v kin ngh 65
Trc ht, vi mc tha mn cng vic trung bnh 3.33 l tng i thp nn ngi
s dng lao ng cn phi thc hin nhiu bin php nhm tng s tha mn cng
vic ca nhn vin mnh. Khi c s tha mn cng vic cao nhn vin s lm vic
hiu qu hn v gn b lu di vi cng ty hn. Vi kt qu phn tch hi quy cho
thy cc nhn t nh hng s tha mn cng vic bao gm s tha mn i vi thu
nhp, c im cng vic, cp trn, o to thng tin, phc li c bn v phc li
cng thm. Cng nh hng ca cc nhn t ny c th hin qua h s hi
quy ca cc bin trong phng trnh gip ngi s dng lao ng thy c mnh
Chng 5: Kt lun v kin ngh 66
m bo vic phn phi thu nhp c cng bng, trc ht doanh nghip cn
phi tham kho, xem xt, so snh thu nhp ca nhn vin mnh vi nhn vin cc
doanh nghip khc cng ngnh, nh gi ng v tr v vai tr ca tng nhn vin
trong t chc xc nh mc thu nhp ph hp cho tng nhn vin. Ngoi ra, v
s cng bng y ph thuc rt nhiu vo nhn thc ca ngi lao ng nn
doanh nghip phi tm cch gip nhn vin nhn thc rng h c tr thu nhp
mt cch cng bng. lm vic ny, doanh nghip cn c bng m t cng vic
cho tng v tr c th, gip tng nhn vin thy c v tr, vai tr v ng gp ca
mnh cng nh ca thnh vin khc trong cng ty. C nh vy nhn vin mi cm
thy mnh c tr thu nhp cng bng (t nht l trong ni b doanh nghip). Cui
cng, doanh nghip cng phi lu trnh vic u i thu nhp (cng khai) i vi
nhng ngi thn thch, h hng trong doanh nghip v iu ny cng nh hng
n cm nhn v s cng bng ca ngi lao ng.
mn i vi cc khon thng, doanh nghip phi xy dng cho mnh chnh sch
thng r rng v ton din ngay t ban u vi cc mc thng c th cho tng
thnh tch c th. n lc xt thng doanh nghip phi da v nhng g ra
m thng.
Ngoi ra, bn cnh nhng phn thng vt cht th phn thng tinh thn nh
nhng li tn dng, ng vin cng c vai tr ht sc quan trng.
Doanh nghip phi trnh thng trn lan bnh qun thng thy cc doanh nghip
nh nc v n t c tc dng to s tha mn hay ng vin ngi lao ng lm
vic tt hn m c xem nh l mt khon lng khc v khon thng ny khng
ph thuc vo hiu sut lm vic ca h.
Trong trng hp trong thi gian th vic pht hin nhn vin khng ph hp
vi v tr cng vic th phi mnh dn t chi ngi v tm ngi khc ph hp
hn. Nu cm thy ngi l ngi ph hp vi v tr khc ang trng trong
doanh nghip th c th thng lng li vi ngi lao ng.
Sau mt thi gian cng tc ti doanh nghip, nhn vin c th c nhu cu hon i
cng vic sang v tr khc, lc ny doanh nghip cng cn tn trng mong mun ny
ca nhn vin v phi tin hnh hon i v tr cng vic nu c v tr cng vic ph
hp vi nhn vin .
5.2.3. Cp trn
Song song vi vic thc s quan tm n nhn vin ca mnh, cp trn cng cn
phi ghi nhn ng gp ca nhn vin cp di khi h t c cc mc tiu
ra. Nhng li ng vin v tn dng s khng bao gi d tha khi cp trn mun
cp di ca mnh lm vic tt hn. Cp trn cng khng c thin v trong i x
gia cc nhn vin cp di ch v l do c nhn hay v nhn vin no hay a dua
mnh.
Chng 5: Kt lun v kin ngh 70
Cui cng, doanh nghip phi chng minh cho ton th nhn vin thy nhng ngi
c nng lc v n lc trong cng vic s c to iu kin thng tin. Khi c v
tr qun l trng hay mi trong doanh nghip cn u tin xem xt nhng ngi
n lc ng gp cho doanh nghip hn l tuyn ngi qun l mi t bn ngoi.
5.2.5. Phc li
Trong cc phc li cng thm trn, doanh nghip no cng c th s dng mt cng
c l c phn ca doanh nghip. C phn ny cho php nhn vin nm gi n c
chia c tc nht nh hng nm cng nh to thm ng lc lm vic tt hn v khi
nm gi c phn th bn thn nhn vin l mt c ng trong doanh nghip. Ty
trng hp c th m doanh nghip c th cho tng (vi iu kin rng buc nht
nh) hay to iu kin cho nhn vin mua vi gi u i.
5.2.6. Lu khc
Ngoi ra, t kt qu kim nh s tha mn cng vic gia nhng vin c thi gian
cng tc khc nhau, doanh nghip cng phi lu rng nhn vin vn phng c thi
gian cng tc lu nm (t 3 nm tr ln) thng c s tha mn cng vic gim i
so vi nhn vin c thi gian cng tc ngn hn. Do vy, doanh nghip cn c
nhng bin php nhm ngn chn tnh trng gim st s tha mn cng vic ny
bng cch to iu kin cho h c m nhn cng vic mi (c im cng vic),
thc hin vic lng tng theo thm nin cng tc (thu nhp), to c hi cho h
c o to thng tin, v.v.
Ting Vit
1. Nguyn Th Cnh (2007), Gio trnh Phng php & phng php lun
nghin cu khoa hc kinh t, Nh xut bn i hc Quc gia TP.HCM.
2. Trn Kim Dung (2005), o lng mc tha mn i vi cng vic trong
iu kin ca Vit Nam, Tp ch Pht trin Khoa hc Cng ngh, i hc
Quc Gia TP.HCM.
3. Hong Trng & Chu Nguyn Mng Ngc (2005), Phn tch d liu nghin
cu vi SPSS, Nh xut bn Thng k.
Ting Anh - English
4. Alam, S.M. Ikhtiar & Kamal, Mostafa (2006), Job Satisfaction of Female
Workers in Different Garments Factories in Dhaka City: An Intertemporal
Comparison, Daffodil International University Journal of Bussiness and
Economics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2006, p. 87-99.
5. Artz, Benjamin (2008), Fringe benefit and Job satisfaction, University of
Wisconsin White water, USA
6. Bellingham, R. (2004), Job Satisfaction Survey, Wellness Council of
America.
7. Bless, C., Higson-Smith, C., & Kagee, A. (2006), Fundamentals of Social
Research Methods: An African Perspective, Juta and Company Limited, 4th
Edition.
8. Boeve, W. D (2007), A National Study of Job Satisfaction factors among
faculty in physician assistant education, Eastern Michigan University
9. Chami, R. & Fullenkamp, C. (2002), Trust as a means of Improving
Corporate Governance and Efficiency, International Monetary Fund Institute.
10. Cooper, D. R. & Schindler, P. S. (1998), Business Research Methodolygy,
McGrawHill Book Co Singapore, Sixth Edition.
76
35. Tuck, Allene (1998), Oxford Dictionary of Business English, 8th Edition,
Oxford University Press.
36. Warren, E. (2008), The relationship between communication, supervision
and job satisfaction, The University of North Carolina at Asheville.
37. Weiss et al (1967), Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionaire, The
University of Minnesota Press.
38. Wesley, J. R. & Muthuswamy, P. R. (2008), Work Role Characteristics as
determinants of job satisfaction: An Empirical Analysis, XIMB Journal of
Management., p. 65 74.
39. Worrell, T. G. (2004), School psychologists job satisfaction: Ten years later,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
40. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Job_satisfaction
41. http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_alderfer_erg_theory.html
Ting Hoa
42. 1977
8 43 1977
Ph lc 1 79
Danh mc ph lc
Ph lc A: Kt qu phn tch thng k t phn mm SPSS 15.0 ........................................ 80
Ph lc A.1: Thng k m t s tha mn cng vic ca mu........................................ 80
Ph lc A.2: Phn tch tin cy Cronbachs Alpha (Reliability).................................. 82
Ph lc A.3: Phn tch nhn t ........................................................................................ 90
Ph lc A.4: Kt qu kim nh T-Test, ANOVA v phi tham s ................................ 106
Ph lc A.5: Phn tch hi quy tuyn tnh (Phng php chn bin Enter).................. 116
Ph lc B: Th in t gi cho i tng kho st .......................................................... 122
Ph lc C: Bng cu hi chnh thc gi i kho st.......................................................... 123
Ph lc 1 80
CHNG A: DUMMY
N Std.
Devia- Min- Max-
Valid Missing Mean tion Range imum imum
Dong nghiep tan tam voi cong
205 0 3.50 .905 4 1 5
viec
Dong nghiep dang tin cay 205 0 3.36 .905 4 1 5
Su dung ky nang khac nhau 205 0 3.79 .987 4 1 5
Hieu ro cong viec 205 0 4.17 .875 4 1 5
Cong viec quan trong 205 0 3.86 .864 4 1 5
Quyen quyet dinh trong cong
205 0 3.84 .894 4 1 5
viec
Nhan duoc phan hoi tu cap tren 205 0 3.47 .958 4 1 5
Cong viec phu hop voi nang luc 205 0 3.55 .952 4 1 5
Thoi gian lam viec 205 0 3.87 1.040 4 1 5
Lam them gio 205 0 3.75 1.194 4 1 5
Phuong tien lam viec 205 0 4.01 .921 4 1 5
Noi lam viec an toan thoai mai 205 0 4.02 .934 4 1 5
Thoi gian di lai 205 0 3.13 1.419 4 1 5
Bao hiem xa hoi, y te 205 0 4.27 1.025 4 1 5
Nghi phep nghi benh 205 0 4.27 .909 4 1 5
Du lich nghi duong 205 0 3.69 1.425 4 1 5
Cong doan 205 0 2.89 1.424 4 1 5
Khong lo mat viec 205 0 3.78 1.106 4 1 5
Phuc loi khac 205 0 2.31 1.276 4 1 5
Hai long voi thu nhap 205 0 3.17 .957 4 1 5
Hai long voi dao tao thang tien 205 0 2.96 1.033 4 1 5
Hai long voi cap tren 205 0 3.39 1.040 4 1 5
Hai long voi dong nghiep 205 0 3.60 .906 4 1 5
Hai long voi dac diem cong viec 205 0 3.46 .936 4 1 5
Hai long voi dieu kien lam viec 205 0 3.61 .941 4 1 5
Hai long voi phuc loi 205 0 3.30 1.041 4 1 5
Hai long voi cong viec 205 0 3.40 .889 4 1 5
Ph lc 1 82
Ph lc 1
Chuong trinh dao tao .049 .271 .290 .344 .594 .603 1.000 .557 .232 .244 .257 .238
Co hoi thang tien .127 .253 .321 .393 .473 .559 .557 1.000 .385 .491 .456 .453
Giao tiep voi cap tren .171 .197 .237 .229 .268 .307 .232 .385 1.000 .628 .557 .498
Cap tren dong vien ho tro .084 .170 .276 .310 .299 .351 .244 .491 .628 1.000 .794 .591
Cap tren quan tam .136 .239 .369 .409 .326 .387 .257 .456 .557 .794 1.000 .744
Cap tren ghi nhan dong gop .253 .389 .474 .494 .316 .349 .238 .453 .498 .591 .744 1.000
Cap tren bao ve nhan vien .140 .280 .325 .309 .321 .344 .285 .454 .408 .632 .694 .584
Cap tren co nang luc .198 .216 .254 .290 .205 .226 .181 .387 .354 .616 .595 .448
Cap tren uy quyen .155 .242 .233 .305 .169 .214 .160 .283 .388 .553 .479 .438
a
. Do gii hn ca trang giy, ch mt phn ca kt qu c th hin bng ny.
Ph lc 1 91
Component
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Cong doan -.023 .003 .017 -.011 -.114 -.039 .455
Khong lo mat viec -.120 -.043 .185 .032 -.037 .149 .154
Phuc loi khac .020 -.035 -.021 -.098 .064 -.223 .530
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
Component Scores.
Su thoa man trung binh d/v cong Nam 79 3.4159 .67091 .07548
viec noi chung
Nu 126 3.2721 .76333 .06800
Ph lc 1 107
Oneway
Bng A-96. Descriptives
Su thoa man trung binh d/v cong viec noi chung
95% Confidence
Std. Interval for Mean
Deviati Std. Lower Upper Min- Max-
N Mean on Error Bound Bound imum imum
Nha nuoc 22 3.1169 .75675 .16134 2.7814 3.4524 1.14 4.29
Co phan 60 3.1738 .75322 .09724 2.9792 3.3684 1.71 5.00
Trach nhiem huu
40 3.4250 .75765 .11979 3.1827 3.6673 1.71 5.00
han
Doanh nghiep tu
8 3.5179 .49450 .17483 3.1044 3.9313 2.86 4.00
nhan
Doanh nghiep
60 3.4667 .73168 .09446 3.2777 3.6557 1.71 5.00
nuoc ngoai
Lien doanh 11 3.4286 .54586 .16458 3.0619 3.7953 2.43 4.00
Khac 4 3.0714 .24744 .12372 2.6777 3.4652 2.86 3.43
Total 205 3.3275 .73079 .05104 3.2269 3.4282 1.14 5.00
Ph lc A.5: Phn tch hi quy tuyn tnh (Phng php chn bin Enter)
Bng A-101. Correlations
Su thoa Su thoa Su thoa Su thoa Su thoa
man trung Su thoa man trung Su thoa man trung man trung man trung
binh d/v man trung binh d/v man trung binh d/v dac binh d/v binh d/v
cong viec binh d/v thu dao tao binh d/v cap diem cong phuc loi co phuc loi
noi chung nhap thang tien tren viec ban cong them
Su thoa man trung binh d/v cong viec noi chung 1.000 .644 .509 .663 .572 .384 .425
Pearson Correlation
Su thoa man trung binh d/v thu nhap .644 1.000 .388 .452 .310 .337 .363
Su thoa man trung binh d/v dao tao thang tien .509 .388 1.000 .477 .335 .307 .411
Su thoa man trung binh d/v cap tren .663 .452 .477 1.000 .558 .359 .344
Su thoa man trung binh d/v dac diem cong viec .572 .310 .335 .558 1.000 .223 .154
Su thoa man trung binh d/v phuc loi co ban .384 .337 .307 .359 .223 1.000 .405
Su thoa man trung binh d/v phuc loi cong them .425 .363 .411 .344 .154 .405 1.000
Su thoa man trung binh d/v cong viec noi chung . .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
Su thoa man trung binh d/v thu nhap .000 . .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
Sig. (1-tailed)
Su thoa man trung binh d/v dao tao thang tien .000 .000 . .000 .000 .000 .000
Su thoa man trung binh d/v cap tren .000 .000 .000 . .000 .000 .000
Su thoa man trung binh d/v dac diem cong viec .000 .000 .000 .000 . .001 .014
Su thoa man trung binh d/v phuc loi co ban .000 .000 .000 .000 .001 . .000
Su thoa man trung binh d/v phuc loi cong them .000 .000 .000 .000 .014 .000 .
Su thoa man trung binh d/v cong viec noi chung 205 205 205 205 205 205 205
Su thoa man trung binh d/v thu nhap 205 205 205 205 205 205 205
Su thoa man trung binh d/v dao tao thang tien 205 205 205 205 205 205 205
Su thoa man trung binh d/v cap tren 205 205 205 205 205 205 205
N
Su thoa man trung binh d/v dac diem cong viec 205 205 205 205 205 205 205
Su thoa man trung binh d/v phuc loi co ban 205 205 205 205 205 205 205
Su thoa man trung binh d/v phuc loi cong them 205 205 205 205 205 205 205
Ph lc 1 117
Adjusted Error of R
R R the Square F Sig. F Durbin-
R Square Square Estimate Change Change df1 df2 Change Watson
1 .813(a) .661 .651 .43165 .661 64.455 6 198 .000 2.017
a Predictors: (Constant), Su thoa man trung binh d/v phuc loi cong them, Su thoa man trung binh d/v dac diem cong viec,
Su thoa man trung binh d/v phuc loi co ban, Su thoa man trung binh d/v thu nhap, Su thoa man trung binh d/v dao tao
thang tien, Su thoa man trung binh d/v cap tren
b Dependent Variable: Su thoa man trung binh d/v cong viec noi chung
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
Regression 72.056 6 12.009 64.455 .000(a)
1 Residual 36.891 198 .186
Total 108.948 204
a Predictors: (Constant), Su thoa man trung binh d/v phuc loi cong them, Su thoa man trung binh d/v dac diem cong viec,
Su thoa man trung binh d/v phuc loi co ban, Su thoa man trung binh d/v thu nhap, Su thoa man trung binh d/v dao tao
thang tien, Su thoa man trung binh d/v cap tren
b Dependent Variable: Su thoa man trung binh d/v cong viec noi chung
Ph lc 1 118
a
Bng A-106. Residuals Statistics
Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N
Predicted Value 1.7478 4.9731 3.3275 .59432 205
Residual -1.23721 1.32817 .00000 .42525 205
Std. Predicted Value -2.658 2.769 .000 1.000 205
Std. Residual -2.866 3.077 .000 .985 205
a
. Dependent Variable: Su thoa man trung binh d/v cong viec noi chung
Ph lc 1 119
A A
A A
A
2.00000 A
A A A
Standardized Residual
A
A AA A
A A A
A
A A A
A A A A AA A A A
A A A A A
AA AAAA A AA A A
A AAA A
A
A A
A AA A
A A A
A A A
A A A A
A
A AA AA
A A
A A
AA A
A A A
A
A A A A AA AA A AA
0.00000 AAA AA AA A A
A AA
A A
A A
A AA AA A A A A
A
A
A A
A A
A AA A
A AA
A
A A A
A
A A A A
A A A A A
AA A A AAA
A
A
A A A A
AA A AA AAA A A
A A AA A
A A A A
A A
A A
AA
-2.00000 A A
A A
A
A
A
Nonparametric Correlations
Su thoa man trung binh Correlation Coefficient -.079 .438(**) .464(**) 1.000 .531(**) .360(**)
d/v cap tren Sig. (2-tailed) .260 .000 .000 . .000 .000
N 205 205 205 205 205 205
Su thoa man trung binh Correlation Coefficient .060 .302(**) .334(**) .531(**) 1.000 .255(**)
d/v dac diem cong viec Sig. (2-tailed) .395 .000 .000 .000 . .000
N 205 205 205 205 205 205
Su thoa man trung binh Correlation Coefficient .061 .330(**) .318(**) .360(**) .255(**) 1.000
d/v phuc loi co ban Sig. (2-tailed) .385 .000 .000 .000 .000 .
N 205 205 205 205 205 205
Su thoa man trung binh Correlation Coefficient .046 .348(**) .416(**) .340(**) .134 .415(**)
d/v phuc loi cong them Sig. (2-tailed) .508 .000 .000 .000 .056 .000
N 205 205 205 205 205 205
**
. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Ph lc 1 121
Graph: Histogram
40
30
Frequency
20
10
Mean =-8.59E-16
Std. Dev. =0.98518
N =205
0
-2.00000 0.00000 2.00000 4.00000
Standardized Residual
2
Expected Normal Value
-1
-2
-3
-2 0 2 4
Observed Value
Ph lc 2 122
Trc ht xin chc mng nhng anh/ch no bo v xong lun vn cao hc. Tip n mong cc bn
cha lm hoc hoc ang lm th nhanh chn ln hon tt nha. Ton ch mi lm xong cng
nghin cu thi v ang tin hnh gi bng cu hi i thu thp thng tin nn nh anh ch tr li gip.
ng thi, nu c th, nh anh ch chuyn gip cho bn b ca mnh (tt nht l khng cng 1 cng ty)
tr li thm dm.
Ton.
Ph lc 3 123