Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Petronas STD
Petronas STD
Petronas STD
34
January 2011
Page 3
PREFACE
PETRONAS Technical Standards (PTS) publications reflect the views, at the time of publication, of
PETRONAS OPUs/Divisions.
They are based on the experience acquired during the involvement with the design, construction,
operation and maintenance of processing units and facilities. Where appropriate they are based on,
or reference is made to, national and international standards and codes of practice.
The objective is to set the recommended standard for good technical practice to be applied by
PETRONAS' OPUs in oil and gas production facilities, refineries, gas processing plants, chemical
plants, marketing facilities or any other such facility, and thereby to achieve maximum technical and
economic benefit from standardisation.
The information set forth in these publications is provided to users for their consideration and
decision to implement. This is of particular importance where PTS may not cover every requirement
or diversity of condition at each locality. The system of PTS is expected to be sufficiently flexible to
allow individual operating units to adapt the information set forth in PTS to their own environment and
requirements.
When Contractors or Manufacturers/Suppliers use PTS they shall be solely responsible for the
quality of work and the attainment of the required design and engineering standards. In particular, for
those requirements not specifically covered, it is expected of them to follow those design and
engineering practices which will achieve the same level of integrity as reflected in the PTS. If in
doubt, the Contractor or Manufacturer/Supplier shall, without detracting from his own responsibility,
consult the owner.
Subject to any particular terms and conditions as may be set forth in specific agreements with users,
PETRONAS disclaims any liability of whatsoever nature for any damage (including injury or death)
suffered by any company or person whomsoever as a result of or in connection with the use,
application or implementation of any PTS, combination of PTS or any part thereof. The benefit of this
disclaimer shall inure in all respects to PETRONAS and/or any company affiliated to PETRONAS that
may issue PTS or require the use of PTS.
Without prejudice to any specific terms in respect of confidentiality under relevant contractual
arrangements, PTS shall not, without the prior written consent of PETRONAS, be disclosed by users
to any company or person whomsoever and the PTS shall be used exclusively for the purpose they
have been provided to the user. They shall be returned after use, including any copies which shall
only be made by users with the express prior written consent of PETRONAS.
The copyright of PTS vests in PETRONAS. Users shall arrange for PTS to be held in safe custody
and PETRONAS may at any time require information satisfactory to PETRONAS in order to ascertain
how users implement this requirement.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 6
1.1 SCOPE........................................................................................................................ 6
1.2 DISTRIBUTION, INTENDED USE AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS ......... 6
1.3 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................. 6
1.4 ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................... 8
1.5 CROSS-REFERENCES ............................................................................................. 9
2. MATERIALS ............................................................................................................. 10
2.1 GENERAL ................................................................................................................. 10
2.2 THERMOPLASTIC LINER MATERIALS .................................................................. 11
2.3 MATERIAL SELECTION GUIDE .............................................................................. 18
2.4 MATERIAL TESTING ............................................................................................... 19
2.5 END CONNECTORS ................................................................................................ 23
3. DESIGN .................................................................................................................... 24
3.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 24
3.2 MINIMUM LINER THICKNESS................................................................................. 25
3.3 LINER DESIGN PROCEDURE................................................................................. 26
3.4 VENT POINT DESIGN .............................................................................................. 32
3.5 PULL-IN LOADS AND INSERTION LENGTH .......................................................... 34
3.6 DESIGN OF END CONNECTORS ........................................................................... 35
4. MANUFACTURE OF THE THERMOPLASTIC LINER ............................................ 37
4.1 PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE .............................................................................. 37
4.2 FINISH AND WORKMANSHIP ................................................................................. 37
4.3 DIMENSIONS, WEIGHTS AND TOLERANCES ...................................................... 38
4.4 QUALITY PROGRAMME .......................................................................................... 38
4.5 EQUIPMENT MARKING ........................................................................................... 41
4.6 HANDLING AND STORAGE .................................................................................... 42
5. LINER INSTALLATION ............................................................................................ 43
5.1 GENERAL - INSTALLATION TECHNIQUES ........................................................... 43
5.2 PREPARATION PHASE ........................................................................................... 45
5.3 LINER FABRICATION PHASE ................................................................................. 47
5.4 LINER INSTALLATION ............................................................................................. 49
5.5 END FLANGES AND IN-LINE FLANGED JOINTS .................................................. 51
5.6 TESTING................................................................................................................... 52
6. OPERATION ............................................................................................................. 53
6.1 START-UP ................................................................................................................ 53
6.2 DE-PRESSURISING ................................................................................................. 53
6.3 PIGGING ................................................................................................................... 53
6.4 FLOW VELOCITY ..................................................................................................... 53
6.5 VENTING .................................................................................................................. 53
6.6 MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................ 53
6.7 REPAIR ..................................................................................................................... 54
6.8 OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE FOR A LINED PIPELINE ....................................... 54
7. DOCUMENTATION .................................................................................................. 55
7.1 INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE PRINCIPAL ..................................... 55
7.2 INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR .............................. 55
8. REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 56
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 CURRENT RANGE OF SERVICE EXPERIENCE .......................................... 59
APPENDIX 2 EXAMPLE OF OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE ............................................... 61
APPENDIX 3 LINER DESIGN DATA SHEET ........................................................................ 63
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 5
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 SCOPE
This PTS specifies requirements and gives recommendations for the selection, design,
manufacture, installation and operation of thermoplastic liners in carbon steel pipelines and
flowlines. It covers both the retro-fitting of thermoplastic liners inside existing carbon steel
pipelines and flowlines as well as new pipelines and flowlines.
In the context of this PTS, a liner consists of a number of thermoplastic pipe lengths which
are fused together into sections of up to approximately 1 km. After pressure testing, the
section of liner is inserted into a pre-welded carbon steel pipeline or flowline section. The
carbon steel pipe provides the pressure containment and the liner the internal corrosion
protection. At the ends of the section the liner is terminated in a thermoplastic flange or
other (usually mechanical) connection system, to enable sections to be joined together.
Onshore, offshore, buried and above-ground applications are considered. Within certain
limitations, thermoplastic lined pipelines and flowlines may be used in oil, gas or water
service. Although the scope is directed towards thermoplastic liners for carbon steel
pipelines and flowlines, much of the content is also relevant for liners inserted in flexible
flowlines and risers.
The liners covered in this PTS are based both on currently applied thermoplastic materials
and on those materials that have the potential to be applied in future, more demanding
applications.
This PTS only gives requirements for the thermoplastic liner. It is assumed that the carbon
steel pipeline or flowline into which the liner is to be inserted has been designed and
constructed in accordance with PTS 31.40.00.20.
Amended per
Circular 05/02
Factory-applied liners inside steel pipe and fittings are covered by PTS 31.38.01.11-Gen.
Hose lining techniques, using polyester materials with fibre tubes and epoxy to bond these
to the pipe wall, are not covered by this PTS. Pipelines lined with thermoset materials such
as GRE (Glass fibre Reinforced Epoxy) are not covered by this PTS either.
1.3 DEFINITIONS
maintenance of a facility. The Principal may undertake all or part of the duties of the
Contractor.
The Manufacturer/Supplier is the party which manufactures or supplies equipment and
services to perform the duties specified by the Contractor.
The Principal is the party which initiates the project and ultimately pays for its design and
construction. The Principal will generally specify the technical requirements. The Principal
may also include an agent or consultant to act for, and on behalf of, the Principal.
The word shall indicates a requirement.
The word should indicates a recommendation.
1.4 ABBREVIATIONS
CRA Corrosion Resistant Alloy
ESC Environmental Stress Cracking
ID Nominal internal diameter
HDPE High Density Polyethylene
MDPE Medium Density Polyethylene
OD Nominal outside diameter
PA Polyamide
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 9
PE Polyethylene
PK Polyketone
PP Polypropylene
PPS Polyphenylene Sulphide
PTFE Polytetrafluoroethylene
PVC Polyvinylchloride
PVDF Polyvinylidenefluoride
SDR Standard Dimension Ratio
UV Ultra violet light
XLPE or PEX Cross-linked Polyethylene consisting of long polymer chains in
a 3-dimensional structure.
1.5 CROSS-REFERENCES
Where cross-references to other parts of this PTS are made, the referenced section
number is shown in brackets. Other documents referenced in this PTS are listed in (8).
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 10
2. MATERIALS
2.1 GENERAL
The Contractor shall be responsible for the selection and supply of all materials required to
meet the specified installation and service conditions (7). The Contractor shall have either
measured test data (preferred) or documented methods for predicting the thermoplastic
liner material properties for the specified service conditions. For the predictive methods, the
Contractor shall have available, for review by the Principal, records of tests and
evaluations, which demonstrate that the predictive method yields conservative results. If the
conveyed fluid contains gas, it shall be demonstrated by testing or documented evidence of
standard testing that the thermoplastic will not blister or degrade during service, i.e. start-
up, continuous operation or shut-down (rapid de-pressurisation).
The Contractor shall also be responsible for documenting the mechanical, thermal, fluid
compatibility and permeability properties of the thermoplastic liner material (2.4).
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 11
Numerous PE grades are available. The differences between them primarily result from the
polymerisation processes for the production of the base polymer, chemical modifications or
enhancements with additives. Base polymer density is used to indicate PE type. Low,
medium and high-density grades are distinguished as LDPE, MDPE and HDPE. This
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 12
characterisation applies to most vendor data. For lining applications, three types of PE are
used; in increasing order of strength and chemical resistance, they are:
MDPE, used in low-pressure water and gas distribution applications;
HDPE, used in all types of service;
Ultra High Molecular Weight (UHMW-HDPE) used in demanding applications.
MDPE (or PE 80) is a relatively soft grade and is used in (low) pressure applications at
ambient conditions. It has good 50-year creep-rupture performance and is easy to
manufacture (extrude) and install.
HDPE (or PE 100) is the basic engineering grade of PE. Compared to MDPE, it has a
higher yield and ultimate strength, a higher modulus and better chemical resistance. These
improved properties come with the penalty of slightly more difficult extrusion and
installation. However, HDPE is more sensitive to notches and has a lower environmental
stress cracking (ESC) resistance than MDPE.
UHMW-HDPE is developed for aggressive chemical environments and high toughness.
Compared to HDPE it has a higher yield and ultimate strength, a higher modulus and better
chemical resistance. This results in reduced swelling in crude oil and an increased
capability of bridging pinhole leaks in the carbon steel outer pipe. However, these improved
properties come with a penalty of considerably more difficult extrusion and installation.
The above description is for general information only. There is a general trend away from
merely specifying PE grades, and it is recommended to specify the material properties of
PE listed in (Table 2.2.1b) instead.
A summary of typical material properties of PE in ambient conditions is presented in (Table
2.2.1b). This Table is for comparison purposes only. Manufacturers shall submit the
relevant (minimum) material property specifications at the specific service conditions.
Table 2.2.1b "Typical" material properties of PE
Typical properties PE (MD) PE (HD) PE (UHMW)
Tensile properties at
23 C
Yield strength (MPa) 18 25 32
Stress at break (MPa) 20 20 25
Elongation at break >400 >400 >400
(%)
Modulus (MPa) 400 700 1100
Thermal conductivity 0.35 0.4 0.4
(W/m.K)
Coefficient of thermal 200 x 10-6 200 x 10-6 200 x 10-6
expansion
1
(K )
Mechanical properties 23 C 40 C 60 C 23 C 40 C 60 C 23 C 40 C 60 C
(function of
temperature)
Modulus (MPa) 400 250 130 700 450 250 1100 600 400
Poisson ratio 0.35 0.38 0.4 0.35 0.38 0.4 0.35 0.38 0.4
All PE pipe and fittings supplied to this PTS shall be stabilised against degradation by UV-
light in accordance with standard practices by a minimum of 2% (by mass) of Carbon Black
(ASTM D 3350).
A UV stabiliser as specified by ASTM D 3350, code C or D shall be added.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 13
PA liners shall comply with the requirements of ASTM D 4066 and ASTM F 1733.
PVDF has good mechanical properties. The modulus and yield strength are high but the
yield strain is low. The pure polymer is difficult to extrude and to overcome this, plasticised
grades (both homopolymer and co-polymer) are used, for example as pressure sheaths in
flexible flowlines and risers. Only co-polymer grades of PVDF should be used to minimise
problems associated with leaching out of the plasticiser.
A summary of typical material properties of PVDF is presented in (Table 2.2.3b). This Table
is for comparison purposes only. Manufacturers shall submit the relevant (minimum)
material property specifications at the specified service conditions.
Table 2.2.3b "Typical" material properties of PVDF
Typical properties PVDF (homopolymer) PVDF (co-polymer)
Density (g/cm3) 1.78 1.78
Tensile properties at
23 C
Yield strength (MPa) 55 25
Stress at break (MPa) 40 35
Elongation at break (%) >20 >50
Modulus (MPa) 2200 1000
Thermal conductivity 0.19 0.18
(W/m.K)
Coefficient of thermal 130 x 10-6 140 to 180 x 10-6
1
expansion (K )
Mechanical properties 23 C 40 C 75 C 90 C 120C 23 C 40 C 75 C 90 C 120C
(function of
temperature)
Modulus (MPa) 2200 1750 1000 750 400 1000 650 250 150 110
Poisson ratio 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.5 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.5
PVDF liners shall comply with the requirements of ASTM D 3222 and ASTM F 491.
In general, the mechanical properties of PP, i.e. high modulus and high yield strength with
sufficient strain to failure, are sufficient for liner installations. A summary of typical material
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 15
properties of PP is presented in (Table 2.2.4b). This Table is for comparison purposes only.
Manufacturers shall submit the relevant (minimum) material property specifications at the
specified service conditions.
Table 2.2.4b "Typical" material properties of PP
Typical properties PP
Density (g/cm3) 0.9
Tensile properties at 23 C
Yield strength (MPa) 35
Stress at break (Mpa) 40
Elongation at break (%) >100
Modulus (MPa) 1200
Thermal conductivity (W/m.K) 0.22
Coefficient of thermal expansion 180 x 10-6
1
(K )
PP liners shall comply with the requirements of the ASTM D 2657, ASTM D 4101 and
ASTM F 492.
There are many different grades of PPS available but because of its molecular structure
PPS shall be plasticised to enable extrusion and to provide the flexibility required to enable
insertion as a liner.
PPS has good mechanical properties, high modulus and strength but a limited strain to
failure. A summary of typical material properties of PPS is presented in (Table 2.2.5b). This
Table is for comparison purposes only. Manufacturers shall submit the relevant (minimum)
material property specifications for the liner material at the specified service conditions.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 16
Specifications for PPS liners shall be agreed between the Contractor and the Principal.
The cross-linking of PE implies that PEX is stiffer than PE with a corresponding reduction in
flexibility. For liner applications the material properties, modulus and yield strength are
good, with a strain-to-failure strength sufficient for insertion.
A summary of typical material properties of PEX is presented in (Table 2.2.6b). This Table
is for comparison purposes only. Manufacturers shall submit the relevant (minimum)
material property specifications for the liner material at the specified service conditions.
Table 2.2.6b "Typical" material properties of PEX
Typical properties PEX
Density (g/cm3) 0.95
Tensile properties at 23 C
Yield strength (MPa) 25
Stress at break (MPa) 30
Elongation at break (%) >50
Modulus (MPa) 800
Thermal conductivity (W/m.K) 0.35
Coefficient of thermal expansion 120 x 10-6
1
(K )
Specifications for PEX liners shall be agreed between the Contractor and the Principal.
Specifications for PK liners shall be agreed between the Contractor and the Principal.
The material selection process involves matching the material properties of the candidate
thermoplastic liner materials to the loads and boundary conditions listed in (Table 2.3) to
provide the most appropriate material option.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 19
The following list of tests (mechanical, thermal, permeation, compatibility and ageing tests)
represents a complete material qualification programme (Table 2.4). For most applications
only a restricted qualification programme will be required. Additional tests, specific to the
unique operating conditions, shall be agreed between the Contractor and the Principal.
Other standard test procedures may replace those listed in (Table 2.4) on agreement
between the Contractor and the Principal. (Table 2.4) also indicates for which applications
the tests are required along with the purpose of the tests.
A chemical analysis of the compounds comprising the thermoplastic pipe material shall be
available for review by the Principal.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 20
Table 2.4 Standard test procedures required in the materials qualification procedure
Characteristic Applications Tests Test Purpose Comments
procedure
Mechanical/ All applications Creep modulus ASTM D2990 Collapse calculation
physical properties
Yield strength/elongation ASTM D 638 Installation requirement
Ultimate strength/elongation ASTM D 638 Installation requirement
Stress relaxation properties ASTM E 328 Installation requirement or ISO 527 R
Modulus of elasticity ASTM D 790 Collapse calculation or ISO 868
Hardness ASTM D 2240 QA/QC or ISO 180
Impact strength ASTM D 256 QA/QC
Abrasion resistance ASTM D 4060 Flow conditions or ASTM D 1044
Density ASTM D 792 QA/QC or ASTM D 1505
Notch sensitivity ASTM D 256 Defect assessment and QA/QC
Thermal properties All applications Coefficient of thermal expansion ASTM E 831 Installation requirement and collapse
assessment
Melt flow index ASTM D 1238 QA/QC ISO 1133
Heat distortion temperatures ASTM D 648 QA/QC upper temperature limit Method A
Brittleness temperature ASTM D 746 QA/QC lower temperature limit Or glass transition temperature
(ASTM E 1356)
Permeation/ Only if gas phase present Fluid permeability See (2.4.1) Collapse calculation venting rates For gas phase components at
Characteristics design conditions
Blistering resistance See (2.4.2) No blistering for gas phase At design conditions
components
Compatibility and Only if gas phase present Ageing test See (2.4.3) Degradation in modulus collapse
ageing calculation
All applications Swelling test See (2.4.4) Collapse calculation
Environmental stress cracking ASTM D 1693 QA/QC durability Method C. For PE only
Weathering resistance ISO 4427 QA/QC only if liner exposed Effectiveness of UV stabiliser
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 21
5 cubic specimens, each approximately 125 mm3, shall be machined from a sample of
the actual thermoplastic liner.
Specimen dimensions shall be recorded to the nearest 0.01 mm.
Specimen weight shall be recorded to the nearest 0.001 g.
3
The samples shall be exposed to 500 cm of the liquid hydrocarbon mixture of the pipeline
fluid for 500 h and at the design temperature in a sealed container.
After exposure, the dimensions and weights shall be recorded to the same accuracy as the
pre-expose samples.
Linear swell of the liner, swell (%), is related to the volumetric swell and shall be calculated
as follows;
3. DESIGN
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The Contractor shall be responsible for the design of the liner system and shall take into
account the selected installation method and service requirements.
Thermoplastic liners in carbon steel pipelines can fail due to (in no order of preference):
Environmental stress cracking.
Collapse of the liner due to pressure build-up in the annulus between the liner and the
carbon steel pipe. Gases can permeate through certain thermoplastics and can
accumulate in the annulus. During depressurisation of the pipeline, expansion of this
accumulated gas may cause collapse of the liner.
Excessive material shrinkage.
Buckling due to excessive swelling.
Lack of strength (short term but also long term after ageing).
Cracks due to lack of liner impact resistance or prior exposure to UV light.
Material defects.
Construction defects (gouges, scores).
End termination failures due to creep.
Factors that influence such failures include:
Choice of liner material (amounts and type of thermoplastic, fillers and plasticisers,
anti-oxidants, UV stabilisers).
Thickness of liner.
Quality assurance and control during manufacturing, fabrication and installation.
Exposure to UV light prior to installation.
Installation method used and tightness of fit inside the carbon steel pipe line.
Fluid composition (incl. inhibitors, chemicals, etc.).
Minimum and maximum operating temperatures.
Rate of depressurisation.
Spacing of vent points.
Frequency of venting.
For liners in hydrocarbon service, factors such as stress relaxation, loss of plasticiser,
permeation and absorption of gases and liquids into the polymer should be taken into
account.
The design procedure for a thermoplastic liner consists of determining the thickness to limit
both stress and strain to acceptable levels and to prevent collapse. Factors such as creep
rate, permeation rate and ESC should also be considered, particularly in terms of how they
are affected by liner wall thickness. The outside diameter of the liner shall be determined
taking into account the inside diameter of the carbon steel pipe, the requirements of the
installation technique and handling and storage requirements. Thermoplastic liners often
have to be tailor-made to the application implying that often non-standard dimensions are
used.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 25
Table 3.3 Design procedure as a function of fluid type and tightness of fit
Fluid type Tightness of fit Design procedure
Water Loose, partially Liner thickness determined from maximum of
loose, tight handling or storage (3.3.1) and installation (3.3.2)
requirements
Liquid Loose, partially Liner thickness determined from maximum of
hydrocarbons loose, tight handling and storage (3.3.1) or installation (3.3.2)
requirements or swelling (3.3.5)
Gas, liquid Loose Liner thickness determined from maximum of
hydrocarbons handling and storage (3.3.1) or installation (3.3.2)
and water requirements or collapse (3.3.3.2)
mixtures
Gas, liquid Partially loose Liner thickness determined from maximum of
hydrocarbons handling and storage (3.3.1) or installation (3.3.2)
and water requirements or collapse (3.3.3.3)
mixtures
Gas, liquid Tight Liner thickness determined from maximum of
hydrocarbons handling and storage (3.3.1) or installation (3.3.2)
and water requirements or collapse (3.3.3.4)
mixtures
3.3.1 Liner thickness - handling and storage
To maintain roundness of the liner and dimensional stability during storage, possibly for
several months and to minimise distortion during handling, Manufacturers recommend a
minimum Standard Dimension Ratio (SDR) ranging from 26 to 17.
A minimum SDR of 26 is recommended for less onerous applications, although in
consultation with the Manufacturer a thinner liner may be used. For all other applications
an SDR of 17 is recommended.
where (mm) is the difference between the inner radius of the carbon steel pipe and the
outer radius of the thermoplastic liner. The following inequalities define the liner fit:
where,
t= liner wall thickness (mm)
R= average radius of the liner (mm) defined as
where the subscripts o and i refer to the outer and inner radius of the thermoplastic liner
pipe.
where,
E= liner Youngs modulus (MPa)
= liner Poisson ratio
If liquids present in the service conditions cause swelling of the liner, then the collapse
pressure, Pc (bar), is given by:
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 30
where,
swell = Liner swell (%), (refer 2.4.4)
NOTES: 1. Liner swell is defined as the average swell across the liner thickness.
2. The modulus used in the above Sections should be representative of the thermoplastic polymer
material at the design temperature and include allowance for any possible reductions or
increases due to chemical absorption or de-absorption. The visco-elastic nature of some
polymers may also need to be considered.
where,
Rs = Inside radius of the steel pipe (mm)
For a tight fitting liner it is conservatively assumed that the annulus volume is proportional
to the surface roughness of the outer steel pipe. The initial volume is given by:
where,
= Surface roughness of the steel pipe (mm).
NOTE: Determining the initial volume is imprecise due to the uncertainties in the actual situation. It is
therefore recommended that conservative estimates of Vinit be taken if gas expansion is allowed for
in this way.
During the collapse process the product of annulus pressure times annulus volume
remains constant. If the collapse pressure, Pc, calculated from (3.3.3.1) to (3.3.3.4), times
the annulus volume at collapse, Vc, is less than the design pressure, Pdes, of the pipeline
times the initial annulus volume at collapse, Vinit, then the liner wall thickness is not
sufficient to prevent collapse. If the product is greater then the liner will not collapse. The
following inequality defines the allowance for gas expansion procedure:
3.3.5 Swelling
If the pipeline fluids are liquid then a possible collapse mechanism can be driven through
swelling of the liner. For example, PE can swell by up to 10% in certain hydrocarbon
environments (aromatics). To prevent the liner from collapsing due to swelling only, then
the following design inequality formula shall be used to determine if the liner wall thickness
is sufficient to prevent liner collapse (refer 2.4.4):
NOTE: Swell is defined as the average swell across the liner thickness.
If there is a possibility of the liner swelling while gas is present in the pipeline fluids, then
(3.3.3) shall be used to determine the collapse pressure.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 32
where Pinit is the initial pressure in the annulus. The other terms are defined in (3.3). The
units for pressure and volume are (bar) and (mm 3) respectively.
The initial volume may be difficult to accurately determine. (3.3.4.2) provides a guide for
estimating this initial volume as a function of liner fit. Summarising (3.3.4.2), the initial
volume per unit length of the lined pipe (mm3/mm) is given by;
where = gap between the liner and the steel pipe (mm).
The initial annulus volume, Vinit (mm3), is determined from the product of the vent point
spacing, Lvent (mm), and the initial volume per unit length, Vinit/L, (3.3.4.2) and is given by:
The annulus volume at collapse per unit length Vc/L (mm3/mm), is given by:
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 33
To calculate the collapse volume, Vc (mm3) at collapse, the following assumptions are
made to determine the axial collapse length, Lc:
Under these assumptions the total critical volume at collapse, Vc (mm3), is:
Using values of Pinit, Vinit, Pc and Vc, defined above, the vent point spacing, Lvent (mm), is
given by:
It is assumed (conservatively) that the initial pressure in the annulus, Pinit is equal to the
bore pressure.
A sensitivity analysis with respect to the influence of initial annulus gap size, (mm), on
the vent point spacing, Lvent, shall be performed.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 34
The calculation procedure for determining the maximum loads and stresses acting on the
liner during installation shall be as outlined in this Section. If the Contractor wishes to use
an alternative procedure this shall be submitted to the Principal for agreement.
The friction load contribution to the overall liner pull-in load is derived from two
components. One component is due to the weight of the liner and the associated friction
factor, the other is due to superficial damage to the outside of the thermoplastic liner, i.e.:
where Lliner is the length of liner (m) to be installed and W is the weight of the liner per unit
length (N/m). f is the friction factor and for new pipelines is taken as 0.4. For retro-fitting,
higher friction factors may be required to simulate the surface roughness of the pipe. If the
installation procedure includes liner lubrication then f should be reduced to 0.1.
Fscore is generally zero, unless otherwise quoted by the installer.
The bending load is defined as a function of the pull-in load, the friction factor and the
angle of the bend:
where f is the friction factor, Fpull (N) is the pull-in load and is the bend angle (radians).
The reduction load, Freduce (N) is a function of the installation technique. For each
installation technique a reduction pressure, Preduce (MPa), is quoted and the reduction load
is derived by multiplying this pressure by the cross-sectional area of the liner:
where t (mm) is the liner wall thickness and D (mm) is the internal diameter of the steel
pipe. For the different installation techniques (Table 3.5.3) lists the reduction pressure.
Table 3.5.3 Reduction pressure as a function of installation technique
Installation technique Reduction pressure
(MPa)
Slip-lining 0
Roll-down 0
Tite-lining 5
Swage-lining 5
3.5.4 Total pull-in load and maximum installation length
The total pull-in load, Fpull (N), is calculated from the individual load components described
in (3.5.1) to (3.5.3).
The maximum allowable tensile load on the liner is limited to 50% of the tensile yield
strength, yield (MPa).
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 35
3.6.1 General
The Contractor shall select the end connection and shall submit this for approval to the
Principal. The Contractor shall demonstrate by means of a qualification test that the end
connections meet the same operational requirements as the thermoplastic liner. The
design shall account for shrinkage, creep, ageing of the thermoplastic material and
operational pressure fluctuations.
In general, only flanged connections shall be considered for termination at the ends of
pipeline sections, see (Figure 3.6.2) for typical arrangement. Screwed connectors shall not
be allowed. Compression-type fittings may be allowed for in-situ retro-fitting. An example
of a compression type fitting is presented in (Figure 3.6.1).
FIGURE 3.6.1 TYPICAL THERMOPLASTIC LINER COMPRESSION JOINT
The inside diameter of the steel flange shall be identical to that of the carbon steel pipeline.
The outside diameter of the thermoplastic flange face shall have the same diameter as the
raised face of the carbon steel flange.
The liner weld shall be made by butt fusion welding. If the liner has been pulled in from the
other end, then the flange shall be welded to the liner before the axial tension is released.
The thermoplastic flange shall be made from the same material as the liner and have the
same internal diameter as the liner. The minimum length of the flange shall be 150 mm.
The steel retainer rings shall be such that they fit between the thermoplastic flange and
inside the bolt circle of the steel flanges.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 37
There shall be no reliance on adhesion of the polymer to the steel surface. For live crude
or gas service, vents shall be provided on the spool pieces.
4.2.2 Finish
The internal and external surfaces of the plastic liner shall be free from defects such as
blisters, cracks, scratches, dents, nicks or sharp tool marks which can affect the
performance of the liner. Absence of these defects shall be determined visually or with a
liquid penetrant.
The tolerance on the liner wall thickness shall be -0%/+5% of the specified value.
4.4.4.1 Conditioning
Unless otherwise specified, all Quality Control (QC) specimens shall be conditioned for a
minimum of 4 hours prior to test in air or 1 hour in water at 23 C 2 C.
When conditioning is required for witness tests the specimens shall be conditioned in
accordance with Procedure A of ASTM D 618 at 23 C 2 C and at an agreed level of
relative humidity and conditioning time.
The melt flow rate shall not deviate by more than 30% from the value specified by the
Manufacturer. The change in melt flow rate caused by processing, i.e. the difference
between the measured value for material from the pipe and the measured value for the
compound, shall not be more than 25%.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 40
(Table 4.4.4.3) lists the quality control tests that are required along with the appropriate
standard test procedure, testing frequency and acceptance criterion. The total number of
QC tests shall be agreed between the Contractor and the Principal.
Table 4.4.4.3 QC requirements on material properties during production
Property ASTM Acceptance criteria Frequency
Outside diameter D 2122 API Spec 15 LE, Table 3 Once every hour or once
Wall thickness D 2122 API Spec 15 LE, Table 3 every coil, whichever is
Burst pressure (up D 1599 To be agreed between less frequent
to 100 mm diameter) Contractor and Principal
Strength (Over 100 D 2122 To be agreed between
mm diameter) Contractor and Principal
Hydro-test See 4.4.4.4 Once every coil
Out of roundness D 2122 < 5% of quoted value Once per lot (production
Ovality D 2122 < 5% of quoted value run)
Density D 1505 < 2% of quoted value
Melt flow rate D 1238 < 30% of quoted value
Modulus D 638 < 5% of quoted value
ESC resistance D 1693 < 5% of quoted value
Carbon black D 1603 2% min. unless otherwise
agreed.
4.4.4.4 Hydro-testing
Liner pipe sections shall not show any sign of leakage (burst or weep) or ballooning when
subjected to a hydrostatic pressure test. The hydrostatic test pressure shall be agreed
between the Principal, Contractor and Manufacturer and is maintained for at least 3
minutes. As a guide the test pressure should be 1.5 times the rated pressure for the
stand-alone thermoplastic pipe.
Failure is defined as:
Ballooning Any abnormal localised expansion of a pipe specimen while under
internal hydraulic pressure.
Burst Failure by a break in the pipe with immediate loss of test liquid and
continual leakage of test liquid independent of applied pressure.
Weep Failure that occurs through microscopic breaks in the pipe wall,
frequently only at or near the test pressure. At lower pressures, the
pipe may maintain its integrity.
Scratches in pipe: Surface scratches and nicks in thermoplastic liner may not exceed a
depth of 5% of the nominal wall thickness.
Scratches in flanges: thermoplastic flange surfaces shall be free of scratches and nicks.
Bends: bend angles in thermoplastic liner pipes shall not exceed 5. Bend radii shall not be
less than 5 times the nominal liner diameter.
Dents: The maximum depth shall be the lower of 6.5 mm or 2% of the pipe OD.
4.4.6.1 Purpose
Quality control records are necessary to substantiate that all pipe manufactured to this
PTS conforms to the specified requirements.
4.4.6.3 The following records shall be maintained and supplied by pipe supplier:
1. Quality manual in accordance with (Section 4.4.1).
2. Quality control test results in accordance with (Section 4.4.4).
3. Design and material qualification data in accordance with (Section 3.1) and
(Section 4.1).
4. All procedures utilised by the pipe supplier in the process of fulfilling the order
5. Quality assurance records for all materials supplied by the pipe supplier.
4.6.1 Storage
Coils shall be stored stacked flat one on top of another. Straight lengths shall be stored on
horizontal racks and given support to prevent damage. In either storage form, pipe shall
not come into contact with hot water or steam and shall be kept away from hot surfaces.
Coils containing pipes of diameters greater than 1.5 inches (38 mm) and larger shall not be
stored on edge.
Pipe shall be covered with adequate protection from direct sunlight. If the pipe has to be
stored in the open air before, during or after shipment, it shall be protected from
environmental contamination.
Pipe end covers shall be used to prevent ingress of moisture or dirt to the inside of the
pipe.
4.6.2 Handling
All pipes shall be cleaned, dried and packed before handling and transportation.
Thermoplastic pipe can be susceptible to damage by abrasion and by sharp objects.
Dragging pipe sections or coils over rough ground shall not be permitted. If, due to
unsatisfactory storage or handling, a pipe is damaged it shall be rejected.
4.6.3 Transportation
The minimum requirements for transportation shall be as specified in the following:
API RP 5L1 for railroad transportation;
API RP 5LW for marine transportation.
Pipe transported by sea shall not be shipped as deck cargo.
4.6.4 Coiling
Coil diameter should be sufficiently large to prevent excessive strain being applied to the
pipe. The minimum recommended inside coil diameter shall be determined by:
Coiling diameters are based on maximum allowable axial strain. For thin-walled pipes,
buckling could induce extra axial strain and therefore, before coiling thin-walled pipe, the
Manufacturer should be consulted for recommendations.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 43
5. LINER INSTALLATION
5.1.1 Undersizing
Undersized liner installation involves inserting a liner of outside diameter less than the
inside diameter of the host pipe. The difference in diameter is the insertion clearance. It is
the simplest technique for lining pipes and has been applied for many years in oilfield
applications.
5.1.1.1 Slip-lining
Slip-lining is a technique where the undersized liner is simply pulled into the host steel
pipe. The liner is expanded in place by internal pressure, with or without heating, to yield
the liner while the annulus is vented. There is always a remaining annular gap. Internal
pressure, creep and swell are relied upon to obtain a tight liner fit, often after weeks of
operation. This time period depends strongly on the insertion clearance, liner material
properties and service conditions. If the pipeline is not pressurised for long periods then
there is a risk of the liner reverting to its original undersized dimensions.
5.1.1.2 Grouting
Grouting is a technique where an undersized liner is pulled into the steel host pipe, as in
slip-lining. The insertion clearance is filled with a liquid grout that solidifies, e.g. Bentonite
based systems (concrete-type materials). To ensure complete filling of the annulus, the
initial insertion clearance has to be comparatively large. The consequence of this is that
liner installation is simple but a significant reduction in pipe inside diameter results.
therefore stable in its reduced state. The diameter reduction results in a wall thickness
increase. Installation is by slip-lining, with the pressure expansion step applied to achieve
the initial fit with the annulus continuously vented. As the liner has been plastically
deformed its yield strength is lowered. This implies that the initial liner fit is tighter than with
standard slip-lining. Also the time to establish a stable fit is much shorter with little risk of
reversion to initial liner diameter.
5.1.4 Summary
(Table 5.1.4) summarises the pros and cons in terms of liner fit, installation length and
internal pipe dimensional tolerances of the various installation techniques, where + is
defined as a strength, 0 as neutral and a weakness.
Table 5.1.4 Pros and cons of liner installation techniques
As-installed Installed Dimensional
liner fit section length tolerances
Undersized + +
Consecutive 0 + 0
reduction
Simultaneous + 0
reduction
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 45
5.2.1 General
Whether the liner is to be installed in a new pipeline or retro-fitted into an existing pipeline
will influence the preparation of the inside surface of the carbon steel pipeline. An accurate
assessment of the condition of the host pipeline is critical to ensure a successful lining
operation.
For rehabilitation of existing pipelines, the preparation considerations shall include:
corrosion damage;
presence of leaks;
internal deposits;
diameter variations and mismatches;
weld protrusions and misalignment;
general lay-out with bends, road, river crossings, pig traps, manifolds etc.
In particular, the following checks should be performed.
The condition of the steel pipe should be assessed to determine that sufficient
mechanical strength is retained to meet the design pressure rating for the proposed
service, based on hydrotest and/or inspection survey data. This test should be carried
out at a minimum test pressure of 1.25 times the design pressure with the aim to reach
a stress level as defined by PTS 31.40.00.10-Gen.
The internal condition and dimensions of all lines should be evaluated to ensure that
the liner can be pulled through each segment without significant damage e.g. due to
excessive local weld penetration (icicles). These should be checked by gauging
pigs/plates and/or by pulling a test sample of liner through every flanged pipe section.
Locations for cutting and flanging of the line and any requirement for separate spooled
sections should to be determined. The longest continuous length of liner which can be
installed in straight pipe depends on diameter and wall thickness, but is generally
reduced in practice by local curvature of the line. Breaks are also required at road
crossings, changes in ID and any bends of radius less than 20D, (recommended
minimum where possible is 40D).
Flanges welded to the steel line should be of matching bore and with a minimum
radius at the inside edge of about 6 mm. Vents shall be welded to the line in
accordance with (Section 3.4) of this PTS.
For lining existing buried pipelines, bellholes should be placed at the ends of the line and
at any other locations where breaks in the liner need to be made. In addition to the normal
safety considerations in excavating, sizing and ensuring stability of the bellholes, the
following factors should also be considered:
The working area within the bellhole should be of sufficient size to accommodate the
pipe fusion machine and operator.
The entry slope should be sufficiently shallow to enable the liner pipe to bend
smoothly from ground level to the pipeline depth without severe abrasion against the
steel flange during pull-through. (Provision may also be required for pulling from two
directions within a single bellhole).
Provision of sufficient length and width to enable the pipe ends to be offset for flange
welding and pulling in of the liner.
For new installations, preparation consideration shall include:
site conditions;
steel material selection (surface roughness);
weld specification.
For both a new or existing pipeline, the pipe inner surface shall be thoroughly cleaned
before liner installation.
Particularly for offshore liner installation, special attention shall be paid to ensuring that
there are sufficient space, weight and anchoring provisions (e.g. for pull-in winch) for all
the equipment required for the installation and testing of the liner.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 46
5.2.3.1 General
Material which shows injurious defects on site inspection shall be marked and rejected and
the Contractor so notified.
5.2.3.2 Defects
a) In pipe, surface scratches and nicks shall not exceed a depth of 5% of the nominal
liner wall thickness.
b) Flange surfaces shall be free of scratches and nicks
c) The maximum depth of dents shall be the smaller of 6.5 mm or 2% of the pipe OD.
5.3.1 General
The thermoplastic liner pipe shall be joined using the butt fusion welding process, as
defined in ASTM D 2657, Technique II. Any proposal by the Contractor to use a different
technique, e.g. hand welding, shall be subject to agreement by the Principal.
Contractor personnel performing the butt fusion welding shall be certified by the liner
Manufacturer in the liner joining procedure.
Joining of liners with a wall thickness difference of more than 2 mm shall not be permitted.
Procedures requiring the introduction of additional filler may also be used where
appropriate. Measures to avoid oxidation and thermal degradation of the liner shall be
taken.
After completion of the fusion weld, the internal and external bead of the weld shall be
trimmed. After trimming, the surface of the joint shall be visually examined for evidence of
good fusion. Nicks, gouges or undercuts caused by bead trimming are not acceptable and
shall be removed or cut-out.
5.3.3 Testing
The Contractor shall conduct an air test on the fused liner section prior to installation of the
liner. A maximum pressure of 0.3 bar shall be applied for a duration of not more than 3
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 48
hours unless otherwise specified by the Principal. The pipe should be anchored at 5 to 7
metre intervals with back-fill material before pressuring. A vacuum should not be pulled. All
fusion joints shall be soap-tested in the presence of an Inspector, approved by the
Principal.
Alternatively a water test may be performed. The pressure of the water test shall be 1.5
times the equivalent pressure rated (stand-alone) thermoplastic pipe. This test pressure
shall be agreed between the Principal and the Contractor.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 49
5.4.1 General
All equipment and material required for the installation and testing of the liner shall be
provided by the Contractor unless otherwise agreed.
Procedures to cover the installation of the thermoplastic liner inside the carbon steel
pipeline shall be prepared by the Contractor and submitted to the Principal for approval.
5.4.2 Preparation
The liner test segment attached to the pig train should emerge without serious damage.
Scuffing of the liner surface is permissible but sharp longitudinal scars or other penetration
damage exceeding 0.5 mm or 5% of the wall thickness, which ever is larger, is
unacceptable and would require rectification by further pigging using a breaker pig or by
other means before continuing with liner installation. After rectification another liner test
segment should be pulled through.
5.4.3 Insertion
5.4.3.1 General
Liner insertion techniques depend on the method of installation chosen as outlined in (5.1).
Installation methods and procedures proposed shall include as a minimum:
description of equipment used;
length of sections;
maximum allowable and planned axial pull load. The maximum allowable axial stress
in the liner should be limited to 50% of the tensile yield stress;
type of lubrication - Lubricants can be water or bentonite. The use of grease is not
allowed unless by testing it is proven to be compatible with the thermoplastic liner and
will not lead to stress cracking;
pull-in rate;
methods for continuous load monitoring with calibrated equipment;
precautions shall be taken to ensure that no debris is introduced into the line on the
external or internal surface of the liner.
5.4.4 Expansion
5.4.4.1 General
For all methods, with exception of grouting, the liner shall be expanded. The Contractor
shall propose procedures for this to the Principal.
Thermoplastic polymers have a thermal coefficient of expansion greater than that of
carbon steel. Consequently, allowance for thermal expansion and contraction after pull-in
and during service should be made during the liner expansion phase of installation. A
practical allowance is 20 mm per 10 m of pipe for each 10 C change in temperature. For
fully constrained pipe, a detailed stress analysis shall be performed by the Contractor.
Fitting metal retaining rings around the liner flanges. These are designed to a
controlled thickness to limit compression of the flanges to a pre-determined value
when bolting adjacent segments and to prevent spreading of the flange material under
load.
Flange bolts shall be tightened with a torque wrench, using greased bolts and nuts, in
sequence and to the torque values as specified by the Manufacturer. Too great a bolt
loading may damage the plastic facing on the flanges. Appropriate spring washers should
be used between the nut and the flange. Bolts should be re-torqued after an initial service
period of 24 hours.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 52
5.6 TESTING
The complete lined pipeline system shall be hydro-tested with water at ambient
temperature at the lower of 1.5 times the maximum operating pressure or the pressure of
the pipeline strength test for a period of 24 hours. For the duration of the test all vent points
shall remain open (refer to Section 5.2.3).
The pressure may fluctuate due to variations in ambient temperature, and care shall be
taken that the test pressure does not exceed the lowest rated element in the system.
During hydrotesting, temperature and pressure shall be recorded continuously unless
otherwise agreed with The Principal.
During the hydrotest the pressure shall be increased first to 3 times the liner pipe free-
standing pressure rating with all vents open to allow annular fluids to escape. If all fluids
have escaped or after one hour, which ever takes longer, the pressure shall be increased
to the required hydrotest pressure.
All end terminations and vents shall be visually inspected.
Acceptance criterion shall be that no weeping at flanges or through vent holes, if present,
is witnessed during the test.
At the end of the hydrotest the vents shall all be closed whilst the line is still under
pressure. Two to four weeks after commissioning all vents should be opened and closed
again to allow fluids which may have permeated through the annulus to the vents to
escape as well as to check whether any liner defects have developed.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 53
6. OPERATION
6.1 START-UP
Immediately prior to starting up lined pipeline systems in gas service, any accumulated
pressure shall be bled off at all the vents. As soon as the pipeline is up to operating
pressure, the pressure at each vent point shall be checked and recorded. This should be
repeated after 48 hours' operation.
6.2 DE-PRESSURISING
Before de-pressurising the pipeline the vent points should opened for at least one hour.
The rate at which the vent point can relieve the gas trapped in the annulus should be
estimated to ensure that the venting rate, during de-pressurisation, is sufficient to prevent
a positive pressure difference between the annulus and the pipeline, i.e. at no time during
de-pressurisation should the annulus pressure be greater than the line pressure.
6.3 PIGGING
Pipelines with liners do not usually require pigging. However, if the line requires pigging to
remove fluids, then only foam pigs shall be used.
NOTE: The above velocities are based on the assumption that no hard particles are present in the flow. Hard
particles can be tolerated but the potential erosion rate shall then be assessed.
6.5 VENTING
Venting procedures are required to prevent liner collapse during process upset conditions
(large pressure fluctuations) or shutdowns. Venting is required when gases are present in
the pipeline fluids. Venting is not required for liquid lines.
Vents shall be opened for the following conditions:
before changes in the operating conditions;
before shutdown;
at least monthly to evacuate the permeated gas accumulated in the annulus.
Venting operations shall be recorded in a log and include: date, length of time vent
remained open, vent pressure, volume of gas vented and other general observations. The
requirement for monthly venting may be revised according to experience using the log
entries to justify revising the venting frequency.
Alternatively it may be decided to operate the pipelines with the vents open (assuming
approval from the appropriate Health, Safety and Environment authority), i.e. continuously
venting the annulus. Open vents shall be inspected at least monthly to check integrity of
the thermoplastic liner and blockage of the vent points.
6.6 MAINTENANCE
Vent points shall be kept free from paint or other deposits. Blocked vent points, pipes and
fittings should be cleaned with low-pressure water only. The use of rods, steam jets or
sharp tools for cleaning shall not be permitted.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 54
The vent holes and flange bolt torques shall be checked regularly.
Amended per
Circular 39/08
If very toxic gases (see PTS 01.00.01.30-Gen.) are present the local HSE authority shall
be consulted before venting operations.
6.7 REPAIR
Lined pipes and fittings shall not be repaired by welding, since heat could cause damage
to the liner. If damage occurs to a component of an installed lined piping system, the
damaged component shall be replaced.
Consideration may be given to returning damaged pipes to the Contractor for relining.
Leakage at flanged connections shall be remedied by the measures in the following
sequence:
Re-torquing of flange bolts to the specified values. Care shall be taken that these
values are not exceeded.
Replacement of the pipe spool having the suspect flange face.
7. DOCUMENTATION
8. REFERENCES
In this PTS, reference is made to the following publications:
NOTE: Unless specifically designated by date, the latest edition of each publication shall be used, together
with any amendments/supplements/revisions thereto.
Amended per
Circular 05/02
PETRONAS STANDARDS
Index to PTS publications and standard PTS 00.00.05.05
specifications
Amended per
Circular 39/08
Definition of temperature, pressure and toxicity PTS 01.00.01.30
levels
Piping - general requirements PTS 31.38.01.11
Pipeline and riser engineering PTS 31.40.00.20
Carbon and low alloy steel pipeline flanges for use in PTS 31.40.21.34
oil and gas operations (amendments/supplements to
MSS SP-44)
Non-metallic materials selection and application PTS 30.10.02.13
AMERICAN STANDARDS
Pipe flanges and flanged fittings NPS 1/2 through ASME B 16.5
NPS 24
Large diameter steel flanges NPS 26 through NPS ASME B 16.47
60
Issued by:
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
345 East 47th Street
New York NY 10017
USA
Issued by:
American Petroleum Institute
Publications and Distribution Section
1220 L Street Northwest
Washington DC. 20005
USA
Issued by:
American Society for Testing and Materials
1916 Race Street,
Philadelphia Pa 19103
USA
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
Plastics Determination of Izod impact strength ISO 180
Plastics Determination of tensile properties ISO 527 R
Plastics and ebonite Determination of indentation ISO 868
hardness by means of a durometer (Shore
hardness)
Issued by:
International Organisation for Standardisation
1, Rue de Varemb
CH-1211 Geneva 20
Switzerland
The Shell Group has more than 10 years of favourable operating experience with
thermoplastic liners in water injection, gas and crude oil applications in moderate operating
conditions.
FIGURE A.1 GROUP EXPERIENCE OF THERMOPLASTIC LINED PIPELINES IN
TERMS OF PRESSURE - DIAMETER RANGE
(Figure A.1) presents the broad range of application currently in Group service in terms of
pressure-diameter range. (Figure A.2) presents the current usage as a function of fluid
transported.
FIGURE A.2 GROUP EXPERIENCE OF THERMOPLASTIC LINED PIPELINES AND
FLOWLINES IN TERMS OF FLUID TRANSPORTED
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 60
The bulk of liner applications are for water transport, although several long low-pressure
gas transport lines are also in service.
Polyethylene (PE) is the most commonly used thermoplastic polymer material to date. The
bulk of current applications are limited to operating temperatures below 60 C. It is
anticipated that this service temperature will rise as the application envelope of lined
carbon steel pipelines and flowlines is broadened, implying that other thermoplastic
polymer materials will have to be considered.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 61
The following example is taken from the Shell Canada, Waterton 24 inch gas pipeline.
A.2.1 Scope
Due to excessive internal corrosion on the existing Waterton 24-inch steel pipeline, a
31.5 mm polyethylene liner has been installed.
PE liners do not corrode therefore no corrosion inhibitor injection is required.
The maximum operating pressure of the pipeline has been de-rated to 99.30 bar.
The high-pressure setting on check valves at the upstream and downstream end of the line
has been set to 90 bar to provide additional protection.
A.2.2 Vents
The liner has been pulled into the pipeline in six segments. These segments are joined by
flanges which are buried underground. On each side of the flange a half-inch vent pipe
rises to surface, isolated with a valve. A 1/8" hole has previously been drilled through the
steel pipeline only to vent any annular gas which may permeate through the plastic liner
and migrate up into the vent pipes.
Vents are also required to check the integrity of the liner.
When checking the vents for pressure or bleeding-off the pressure, they shall be dealt with
in the same manner as breaking the integrity of any system:
2 men are required;
1 safety person;
self-contained breathing apparatus shall be worn by worker performing task;
safety person shall be upwind and a safe distance away;
record the vent pressure on the venting log sheet;
annular pressure should be kept below 50 bar at all times;
vents are to be left in the closed position at all times;
during normal operation the pipeline vents will be filled with 100% glycol. This will
reduce the volume of H2S that can accumulate in the vent lines.
CAUTION: Do not use pressure to fill vent lines.
A.2.3 Temperature
If the gas in the line reaches high temperatures the liner could soften. This can cause
weakening of the liner and collapse.
At no time should the temperature of the fluid entering the liner be greater than 45 C.
The upstream heater shall be set to maintain a temperature at 40 C with the high-
temperature alarm set at 45 C.
A.2.4 Pigging
Pipelines with liners do not usually require pigging. However, if the line requires pigging to
remove fluids then it can be pigged with the following restrictions:
- 3 lb (psi) density foam pigs to be used;
- do not pig with ball or hard style pigs. There are signs located at each end to alert
operators to this.
A.2.5 Start-up procedure
Immediately prior to start-up bleed the pressure off all the vents.
Introduce gas into the pipeline.
As soon as the pipeline is up to operating pressure, check and record all vent pressures.
Maintain/record each vent pressure after first 2 days on venting log sheet.
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 62
A.2.6 Operation/routine
Check liner pressure and record on venting log sheet once per month. If time to bleed off
annulus pressure is very short (<10 s) leave closed and continue to check on monthly
basis.
The following information shall be provided by the Contractor during the tender:
Installation technique to be used:
If no, go to Step 10
Step 10
Minimum liner wall thickness mm
PTS 31.40.30.34
January 2011
Page 65
The following information shall to be provided by the Contractor during the tender for:
- Pipe material
- Flange material
- Lined spools
The following information shall be provided by the Principal in the purchase documents:
Process design data Unit Value
Tmax, Maximum design temperature C
Tmin, Minimum design temperature C