Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Should I Use Humor in Advertising?: Do Funny Ads Work Better?
Should I Use Humor in Advertising?: Do Funny Ads Work Better?
Do funny ads work better? the final 15 seconds, in which the benefits of the advertised
service were described, were not changed at all. The enjoy-
Broadly speaking, funny ads are more likely to be memorable ment rating improved, and so did the communication levels.
than others. Almost half of the worlds most impactful ads The improved humor was resulting in more attention being
are humorous; whereas just 1 percent of the least impact- paid to the ad overall.
ful ads are humorous. Furthermore, humor is an emotional
response, and much has been written on the importance of But it is also possible for humor to hinder communication.
emotional responses to advertising. When the humor is unrelated to the key message, it may
swamp the ad, resulting in the message being lost.
But the effect of humor on communication is not so straight-
forward. There are no rules here; each case needs to be judged on its
merits, with a careful consideration of the focus of the ad. So,
Certainly, humor can aid effective communication. For ex- overall, there is no direct relationship between using humor
ample, one ad we tested was criticized for being boring and in an ad and the ads ability to communicate a message.
irritating, with a joke that was just not funny. Enjoyment was
below average. Our recommendation was that there was On the other hand, there is a tendency for funny ads to be
much in the ad that did work well, but that the ad needed seen as a little less credible and relevant so humor has a
more original humor. A new version was produced which in- slight negative effect on persuasion. But there are still plenty
cluded a more original joke at the beginning of the ad; but of examples of humorous ads which were also persuasive:
AnfhkbgZ]l&?nggr
k 6)'12
:eeZ]l @k^ZmZ]l
LiZbg *0. +11
G^ma^keZg]l *0+ -,0
<abe^ */0 *2+
<ZgZ]Z *.* +-.
BmZer *-, ++2
:k`^gmbgZ *-+ +-0
NL: *,1 +-2
F^qb\h *,/ *,/
IheZg] *,* ++)
Lp^]^g *+0 *0+
ND **/ +,)
?kZg\^ **, +.)
Lhnma:_kb\Z!ELF:" *)2 *1+
:nlmkZebZ 22 *++
;kZsbeLZhIZneh 20 .,
KnllbZ 2* 2.
@^kfZgr 02 *)2
Bg]hg^lbZ 0. .1
MaZbeZg] /1 *++
Bg]bZP^lm .. *2
CZiZg ., /2
Bg]bZGhkma -2 -)
<abgZLaZg`aZb -. 0*
Iabebiibg^l ,/ +,
MZbpZg ,) )
Bg]bZLhnma ,) */
<abgZL^\hg]Zkr<bmb^l *1 ./
Humor among men and women The demographic profile of respondents was similar,
but those who saw it in the cinema enjoyed the ad
While advertising can be seen as equally funny by considerably more than those who viewed it on TV
both sexes, there may also be marked differences, with 61 percent of the cinema viewers saying they
particularly with scatological, violent or sexist hu- enjoyed the humor compared with 52 percent of
mor. the TV viewers. Choice of media can have a substan-
tial influence on the effect of the humor.
In the example below, where the humor focused on
body parts being pulled off, men found it distinctive, Knowledge Points are drawn from the Millward Brown Knowledge Bank,
consisting of our databases of 50,000 brand reports and 40,000 ads, as well
involving and interesting, whereas women consid- as 1,000 case studies, 700 conference papers and magazine articles, and
ered it disturbing, unpleasant and irritating: 250 Learnings documents.
www.millwardbrown.com
An`^]b__^k^g\^bgk^lihgl^[^mp^^gf^gZg]phf^g
>gchrpZm\abg` -1 ++ +/
Bgoheobg` -/ ++ +-
=blmbg\mbo^ .- +/ +1
Bgm^k^lmbg` .- +/ +1
=blmnk[bg` *1 -* &+,
Ngie^ZlZgm 1 -0 &,2
&,.
BkkbmZmbg` *- -2