Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Enriquez v.

SunLife- Insurance
Policy
41 PHIL 269
Facts:
> On Sept. 24 1917, Herrer made an application to SunLife through its office in Manila for life
annuity.
> 2 days later, he paid the sum of 6T to the companys anager in its Manila office and was given a
receipt.
> On Nov. 26, 1917, the head office gave notice of acceptance by cable to Manila. On the same
date, the Manila office prepared a letter notifying Herrer that his application has been accepted and
this was placed in the ordinary channels of transmission, but as far as known was never
actually mailed and never received by Herrer.
> Herrer died on Dec. 20, 1917. The plaintiff as administrator of Herrers estate brought this action
to recover the 6T paid by the deceased.

Issue:

Whether or not the insurance contract was perfected.

Held:
NO.
The contract for life annuity was NOT perfected because it had NOT been proved satisfactorily that
the acceptance of the application ever came to the knowledge of the applicant. An acceptance of an
offer of insurance NOT actually or constructively communicated to the proposer does NOT make a
contract of insurane, as the locus poenitentiae is ended when an acceptance has passed beyond the
control of the party.

NOTE: Life annuity is the opposite of a life insurance. In life annuity, a big amount is given to the
insurance company, and if after a certain period of time the insured is stil living, he is entitled to
regular smaller amounts for the rest of his life. Examples of Life annuity are pensions. Life
Insurance on the other hand, the insured during the period of the coverage makes small regular
payments and upon his death, the insurer pays a big amount to his beneficiaries.

You might also like