Page 1

WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Chairman Peter Vogel 23-8-2017
(And other members of the Board of Directors) GWMWater
5 info@gwmwater.org.au Ref: 2305224

Sir,
further to my previous c orrespondences, while the bills (GWMWater) are in the name of G
Schorel reality is that I always sign as G H Schorel. I have not checked the Titles of both
10 properties but suspect they will show my proper names. Why not try to find a single signature of
mined as G Schorel? You may find that I always sign as G H Schorel even with my hyphenated
(lawful) surname Schorel-Hlavka.
I also wonder if GWMWater sold the original alleged debt regarding Richard which it then so
to say by sleight of hand converted to G Schorel then why did then Creditcollect (debt
15 collection agency) not pursue the matter further? Was it that it recognised there was no debt I had
incurred? And yet GWMWater nevertheless continued since then to pursue this and add to it.
Did GWMWater purchase the purported debt back from Credit collect or are both holding
somehow an alleged debt?
For how much did GWMWater then sell the rights to Credit collect?
20 If GWMWater in any shape or matter transferred the rights of the claimed debt (some years
ago) to Creditcollect then what was the write off? Did GWMWater claim it as a taxation write
off at the time and the ATO may have included that in its consideration?
Did GWMWater notify the ATO about any change?
Why does GWMWater in its notice refer to that it can pass on the claimed debt to a debt
25 collector? After all isnt it that we have the courts to decide if a debt e4xist or not? As such, has
GWMWater made the decision for the court to dictate the court it must do as it is told by
GWMWater representatives?
By the way, did you ever bother to read the Letters Patent published in the Victorian Gazette on
2 January 1901? It refer to the impartial administration of justice it means any court that is
30 associated with an ABN to the Department of Justice fails to be an impartial administration of
justice as;
Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte
McCarthy ([1924].
Hansard 1-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
35 Convention), Mr. OCONNER (New South Wales).- QUOTE Because, as has been said before, it is [start page
357] necessary not only that the administration of justice should be pure and above suspicion, but that it should be
beyond the possibility of suspicion; END QUOTE
Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-Now it is coming out. The
Constitution is made for the people and the states on terms that are just to both. END QUOTE
40
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

(Our name is our motto!)

Page 1 23-8-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation.