Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Policy Considerations/ Objective Use of Philippine Waters
Policy Considerations/ Objective Use of Philippine Waters
4. Protect the rights of fisher folk, 1. All waters within the Philippine Territory
especially of the local
communities with priority to 2. Waters around, between an connecting
municipal fisher folk, in the the islands of the archipelago, regardless of
preferential use of the its breadth and dimension
municipal water 3. The territorial sea, the seabed, the
subsoil, the insular shelves and all other
5. to provide support to the waters over which the Philippines has
fishery sector sovereignty or jurisdiction
6. to manage fishery and aquatic 4. 200 nautical miles. Exclusive Economic
resources, in a manner Zone and the continental shelf
consistent with the concept of
an integrated coastal area Where is RA 8550 applied?
management
a) all Philippine waters + other waters
over which the PH has sovereignty
7. to grant the private sector the
and jurisdiction + the country's 200-
privilege to utilize fishery
nautical mile EEZ and continental
resources under the basic
shelf;
concept that the grantee,
b) all aquatic and fishery resources
licensee or permittee thereof
whether inland, coastal or offshore
shall not only be a privileged
fishing areas, including but not
beneficiary of the State but
limited to fishponds, fishpens/cages;
also active participant and
c) all lands devoted to aquaculture, or
partner of the Government
businesses and activities relating to
fishery, whether private or public
lands
CHAPTER 9
REPUBLIC ACT 8550 (amended by RA 10654)
PHILIPPINE FISHERIES CODE OF 1998 Feb 17, 1998
Having found that certain areas are w/in Baseline laws such as RA 9522
EEZ of the PH, the Tribunal declared are enacted by UNCLOS III state
that China had violated the PHs parties to mark out specific
sovereign rights in its EEZ by basepoints along their coasts from
which baselines are drawn to
1) Interfering w/ PH fishing and serve as geographic starting
petroleum exploration points to measure the breadth of
2) Constructing artificial islands the maritime zones and
continental shelf
3) Failing to prevent Chinese fishermen
from fishing in the zone o nothing but statutory
mechanisms to delimit
The tribunal found: maritime zones and
continental shelfs
1) fishermen from the PH had tradtl
fishing rights at Scarborough Shoal o gives notices of the scope
and that China had interfered w/ of the maritime space and
these rights in restricting access submarine areas w/In
which state-parties can
2) Chinese law enforcement vessels
exercise treaty based right
had unlawfully created a serious risk
of collision when they physically UNCLOS III and its baseline laws
obstructed PH vessels no role in acquisition,
enlargement or claim/diminution
RULING: Nullified Chinas 9-dash line as a
of territory
legal basis to claim historic rights to
resources w/in the disputed sea areas as o States acquire territory thru
such were incompatible with the EEZ occupation, accretion,
provided for in the UNLCOS to which China cession and prescription
is a signatory not by executing
multilateral treaties
PH archipelagic baselines law NOT
UNCONSTITUTIONAL Maritime Zones according to United Nations
Convention on Law of the Seas (UNCLOS)
(Magallona vs Ermita) Constutionality of
RA 9522 archipelagic baselines of the PH 1. Internal waters all waters landward
from baseline of the territory. According to
RULING: UNCLOS III has nothing to do w/ the constitution, the waters around,
acquisition/ loss of territory. It is a multilateral between and connecting the archipelago.
treaty regulating among others sea-use (Archipelagic waters)
rights over maritime zones
CHAPTER 9
REPUBLIC ACT 8550 (amended by RA 10654)
PHILIPPINE FISHERIES CODE OF 1998 Feb 17, 1998
PROHIBITIONS
- UNAUTHORIZED FISHING -
o No person shall exploit, occupy,
breed, culture, capture or gather
fish, fry or fingerlings of any
fishery species or fishery
products, or engage in any fishery