Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 128 views

    Rhetorical Analysis Rubric f17

    Uploaded by

    api-368611105
    This document outlines the grading criteria for an assignment analyzing a website's rhetorical appeals. It will be graded on organization, argument and evidence, grammar/mechanics/style, and documentation/format. An A paper will introduce the rhetorical situation, have a clear thesis, be organized around topic sentences, and use evidence to support points. It will have no grammatical errors, use correct citations, and be the appropriate length. Lower grades indicate increasing levels of problems in these areas.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Rhetorical Analysis Rubric f17

    Uploaded by

    api-368611105
    128 views1 page
    This document outlines the grading criteria for an assignment analyzing a website's rhetorical appeals. It will be graded on organization, argument and evidence, grammar/mechanics/style, and documentation/format. An A paper will introduce the rhetorical situation, have a clear thesis, be organized around topic sentences, and use evidence to support points. It will have no grammatical errors, use correct citations, and be the appropriate length. Lower grades indicate increasing levels of problems in these areas.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    rhetorical analysis rubric f17

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines the grading criteria for an assignment analyzing a website's rhetorical appeals. It will be graded on organization, argument and evidence, grammar/mechanics/style, and documentation/format. An A paper will introduce the rhetorical situation, have a clear thesis, be organized around topic sentences, and use evidence to support points. It will have no grammatical errors, use correct citations, and be the appropriate length. Lower grades indicate increasing levels of problems in these areas.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    128 views1 page

    Rhetorical Analysis Rubric f17

    Uploaded by

    api-368611105
    This document outlines the grading criteria for an assignment analyzing a website's rhetorical appeals. It will be graded on organization, argument and evidence, grammar/mechanics/style, and documentation/format. An A paper will introduce the rhetorical situation, have a clear thesis, be organized around topic sentences, and use evidence to support points. It will have no grammatical errors, use correct citations, and be the appropriate length. Lower grades indicate increasing levels of problems in these areas.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Grade Organization (5) Argument and Evidence (5) Grammar, Mechanics, Style (5) Documentation/ Format (5)

    A Introduction briefly summarizes the rhetorical Offers a convincing analysis of the Contains no serious grammatical or Correctly cites any sources using
    situation created by the website (Author, websites use of rhetorical appeals mechanical problems MLA style
    Audience, Purpose, Genre) and builds to a thesis Uses evidence to support all points Uses appropriate transitions to Uses appropriate signal phrases
    directly related to the assigned topic Stays focused throughout on developing connect sentences and paragraphs Is of an appropriate length
    Body paragraphs are organized around thesis- the argument proposed in the thesis Avoids verbiage and redundancy
    supporting topic sentences
    Conclusion demonstrates the significance of the
    analysis

    B Slight problems: Slight problems: Slight problems: Slight problems

    C Significant problems: Significant problems Significant problems: Significant problems:

    D Serious problems: Serious problems Serious problems: Serious problems:

    F Unacceptable college-level work: Unacceptable college-level work: Unacceptable college-level work: Unacceptable college-level work--
    Come see meI can help! Come see meI can help! Come see meI can help Come see meI can help!

    You might also like