MWmoPAouo ATTHE ArtgOLAPCfiIYLS

IN DHX -

.i:nt of Page

Lt:;io Sigler,_Solicitor a Office, Department of

the Interior 68

m. Q. Sharpe, Kennobeo, South Dakota, and Ralpih

H. Case, Washington,-D. C., Representing the
Standing Rook Sioux Tribe of Indinns .7

.1

'A--
 t L E NAYIONA1 AItCHVE* 67

H. R. 5608

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 1956

House of Representativeo,:
Suboommiittee--onW Ili
~d At i
of the Committee on Interior
and Znsular Affairs,
Washington, D. C.

The subcommittee met,,pursuant.to reoess, at:100l a.m.,

. th committee room, New House Office Building, Honorable

,.::
' A. Haley (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding.

:r. Haley. The Interior and Insular Affairi Subcommitteo

i: inJian Affairn will be in order.

!,'; have under discussion for the committee this morning

:. :T.3608. I believe we had finished going over the amendment

~d by the Department of the Interior.

pxc')o;

Berry.
MI.'. The first amendment is whether it should be

" ;.ic're-fourths vote~or a majority vote. The Department has

roia:nded a majority, and the Indians, because of their treaty,

:;;ich provides three-fourths of the male members, stuck to the

.:t; e-fourthe figure. I do not think it makes much difference

:.;c.uo, in the instanoo of the Cheyenne, Congress stayed-bytt e

:;'ordlnS of this bill, and they adopted it by about 93 percent,

I boltove. So I do not think it makes too much difference.

hr. Haley. Mr. Sigler,-would the adoption of this

:.., :;.cition on-the basis of majority vote violate a treaty we

r,
 A THENATIONAL APC$IVES
RPR006EU 6

t.with these Indians now?

STATEMENT OF LEWIS SIOLER, SOLIOI'IORtS OFfPXCE,
DEPARTI4E1IT OF THE INTERIOR.

Mr. Sigler. In my judgment, it would not, Mr. Chairman.

wAt thoro are others who disagree with me.
Mr. Siskc. Mr. Chairman?

- Mr. Haley. The gentleman from California.

14r. Siskc.On the basis -of' that, would an amendment ot

:mendmant be in order? B that, i mean an amendment to thij
twro oned amendment by the Department.
Mr. Haley. Ir somebody will offer'the arendt'neit~. I "thin
tormine'what,'
-4o an get into this thing.- I wanted first to do
-1o. Sigler's opinion was, and ho says there would be-'no violi 1
to~01' the treaty,, but--there are other people who di~agree
..;tth him.

Is Mr. Abbott out in the office?

:1r. Taylor. He has'gone over to the Rules Committee.

IVt~. Haley. Did via-propound that question to him on Monric1j

an ,_(lid he_ give an answer?
Mr. Taylor. I do not recall.

1.1r. Berry.The treaty cays three-fourthsj of the male nom,

*baru. In any event, it will ohango the treaty because it Days!
thrce-fourths of all members. In any event, the treaty ias
:o~i~idandi the Department says, as long as; you aro maodifyinii
tas ell -nodify 50 percent. I onteeeAfly up

til-

4 4f
 ,RiPROUCEO AT THE NATIONAL ACHI VES
S -Y 69

;f utAiring up any fusa. As far as the Cheyonnoa were concerned

.,c
,P .a.ntained it as it i 'in sootion 1.

Dr. Miller. Will the gentleman yield?

Mr. Berry. Yes.

SDr. Miller. In the case of the Cheyenne Indians we iain-

'in
.i three-fourths "of the male?

Mrr. Berry. The'wording in this bill.

D r. Miller. And that' is the wording in -the treaty?

S Mr. Berry. NO. We said three-fourth' of all. The

j:Cheyonno law says it shall"be adopted by a three-fourths of all.

jTheo wording of the Cheyenne'bill is identical withthe wording

-' thia bill. At that time the Department made the same

f;recoinmondation, I think.

Di. Miller. Does the gentleman think it is wise to change

;.he forn in the treaty? Would that cause any dissensioI

S Mr. Berry. It would oause, in my Judgment, unnecoooary.

:iissoen.ion and possibly heap more coal on the Congress for doing

co;:T..h-ing they did not have'to do.

- D.-Miller. The Congressy-howeverhae-pasoed-thebil-fO

it Chyoenno?

Mr. Borry. Yes.

Dr. Miller. And if we are going to follow the same patter,

S.ts;aie to follow that pattern instead of going back to the

pa-rn seuet up in the treaty?

-!.Berry. I would recommend this, although the Departmen,

 H -r.OOUCEO
AT WIE 'IATlONAL .APCHIlVE 70

not.

Dr. Miller. I wonder if the Department could tell un wyihy

, h.y are changing the pattern from what was in the Cheyenne

1:r. Haley. Mr. Siglor, can you answer tht?

I:r, Sigler. Yes, Mr. Chairman. The treaty that you are

.-:.'<rring to, Dr. Millor, has a provision in it to the effect

t
'i::t no further session of land by the Cheyenne Riiver Tribe

,; Ji b2 effected unless approved-by throoefourtho of the adult

:dl3o members. Now a vote f' three-fourths of the adult male

meirbrs -- first, thief is not acossion of land. This'is a'.

Uonc3saonal Act taking the land and paying the Indians for it

noro
out, i..portantly, a three-fourths vote of the male member

is not practical and is not:recommendod by anybody. The Tribo

itsolf in recommending a departure from that requirement in th<

trc:any.

I would like to suggest, I think the Department is:not

!
colly seriously interested in whether the vote is three-fourtts

. o a majority. We recommended a majority of all members, not

,ijunt the male members, because we thought it was uore democrat c

iand Iaoro practical. But ifthere is opposition to a majority

ivoto, I am sure the Department would have no strenuous opposition

to that change.

I do wish to call your attention to the fact that our

fir:i .amendment'ddaeamore. than just change that three-fourths

*.4.-
 MRCPR~.CO AT THE NATIONAL A CHIVES 71

,roviion; it converts the bill into the usual pattern of

i.-ilation rather than a negotiated agreement, which ai isrth

,nture of a treaty, and Congress quit making treaties ith

iniano and agreements of this kind many years ago.

Dr. Miller. Thank you,

Mr. Sisk. Will the gentleman yield?

,r. Berry. Yes.

MIr. Sisk. On the point that has just been trade by Mr.

irloer, I want to bring out that actually, so far as the langge -

I.n thoir proposed amendment, which is a substitution for sae'ti

j

., I was wondering if the author of the bill would object to -4

in vie of the faot the amendment has not been'offered' I cannot

off.r a substitute amendment. I had in mind an amendment whio

,:ould simply strike out "majority".and put in "ratified and

op:-ovc-d in writing by three-quarters", which would bring it

.o:: in line with the treaty we are disusing. I wonder if t

- tcir of the bill feels a substitution like that for the

-:.:-rt'.nt'o proposal for section 1, with the amendment I Just

; u--O -., would=bring it-in-line with what-you -fel-wouild-b .--

:.r. Borry. I would disagree with both you and the counsel

C..ds3ate-- think you are wrong. I think it might be better if

t' c :ihole thing were drafted as legislation instead of an

i:,rco;.: t. But in that event we are going to have to change th

:.t-:o :ill. Section 2 starts out "The United States agrees to

' 'RCOOueo AT THEHAT IOUAL AfHIVES -'

pay", and section 3, "The United States further agroo to ',;.t

j appropriate." If you are going to change one section, do you

.;;ot have to change all of them, Mr. Sigler?

Mr. Sigler. No, I think not, Mr. Berry.

SMr. Berry. All the rost of it is in that form.

* Mr. Sigler. Thero is no reason why the United States

.:.:.nt agree to pay something without having to start'off with"

t'1i usual contract form. I would like to call your attention

Sto tho fact that the next two bills you take up, the Crow Creol

n-:,d Lower Brule, must be converted because the United States

Shi already condemned the'land and taken it, and the agreement

f'onr will not fit those at all. I believe Mr. Case will agree

i:th no on those two. If you are going to do it for those two

.I; seems to me you might Just as well dc it for this one.

Mr. Berry. All right. Let's change it to three-fourths,

mr. Sisk, I am not adamant, I am just meroiy auggeting

:It as a remedy in order to comply with the treatylaw, which

:. am rather opposed to tinkering with. I feel it is not good.

Mr. Haley. We still are in discussion here. I think the

fir3t thing to do is for somebody to offer the amendment.

S I will offer the amendment proposed by the Department.

On pages 1 and 2, revise section 1 to road in its entirety as

follous:

"title to all tribal, allotted, assigned, and inherited

la;:do or interests'therein within the Standing Rook Reservation

1 .' *

.: ' . .' ' , - .*

 A*;-HIVES
; . ^ .... . ./ 73 -

.n -outh
Dakota and lorth Dakota that are within the Taking

: cu.
dc ribed in section 19 of this Act is hereby taken by
St, Uni.ted States for the purposes of the Oahe Dam and

; ;orvoir projeot on the Missouri River in South Dakotas.

! 'ovided, That the effootive date of this Aot shall be th

i dato when the Secretary of the Intorior shall by proolaation

J:clna that the provisions of the Act have been nooopted by a

.ic-ritty of the adult Indiansof the Standing Rook Reservation

' :in ;. by the tribal rollaof the Reservation."

iHc-: you have it before you.

hi
isent.'.eman from Calfornia.

:v. Sink. I would propose ah' amendment: to.tho. amendment.

:C d Iotl; know what lines, butin thoeDepartment's amendment

i y::'.
you have. Just proposed ,they have, over on page 3, second

?.J1:, ".coepted by a majority of the." I would a.tiike "aooeptd

-:/ .: majority" and substitute the following language:

S':Ati~.d and approved in writing by threo-quartoro.

(Discussion off the record.)

Sr. Berry. All you have to do is insert the word !three-_

: r. Haley. On page 2, after the "a" on line 2 insert

".h:hr'e,-fourths".. Is that correct?

ir.- Sisk. Then that would make 'it "accepted by a three-

Wouthinha majority of the adult population."

SMr. Haley. As shown by:the tribal rolls of the reservation.

 'REPAOOcWEo
AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVE"

i Mr. Aopinall. Mr. Chairman, I just wish to have a definl o

. rneratanding of.thio. This means a three-fourths majority f

all the Indians of the tribe entitled to vote who aresadults,

BI that correct? And whether they are on the reservation or

off the reservation, whether they are men or whether they are

w.or.o.n, :

Mr. Sisk. That is right. Their present cmondmont is

I'"of he adult Indians of the Standing Rook Reservation, as

shown by the tribal rolls of the reservation." I propose to

leanvo that language exactly as-it is. -

I.t. Haley, If I understand the gentleman from California,

jall ho is doing here is adding after the word."a"'on lire02,

"three-fourths". Is that right?

Mr. Sisk. That is right, Mr. Chairman, And the only

Purpose is to change it from a simple majority of, say, $1

pior.ent to, say, three-fourths, which will be in compliance

I.th the Treaty of 1867.

:. Haley. Is there any further discussion?

All those in favor of.the-anendment to the amendment say

Thoso opposed say "No."

Tho "Ayes" have it and it is so ordered.

.hat is your pleasure with the amendment?

Ilr. Sisk. I would move the amendment.

IMr. Berry. Second.

 REPROOUCEO AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIV$ 75

:'. Haley. You have all hoard tho motion for tho amend-

*:;., aa amended. Thoso in favor say "Aye".

Those opposed say "No."

The "Ayes" have it and it is so ordered.

iWo will now take up amendment No. 2. On page 2, line 214,

Saiid on page 3, lino7 r,modify the dollar figure" to re id

:z:sunt which Congress determines is fair compensation for the

SdlCreot and indiret'damages sustained by the Indians.

Mr. Berry.
S This applies first to the-lanrd values, i.4i

I Chnirmin, and in that respect the bill does this: The bill

fiurea the land at t50 ana ore, and that is the figure, about

the average figure, that the:Federal Court has allowed on the

a;crcos that have gone to Federal Court.

The HRBI figured the value at $28-plus. -I wonder if it i ul

not be a good idea to have Governor Sharpe, who has tried a

nu.bcr of these cases in Federal Court -- would you care - to

hea. very briefly from Mr. Sharpe? .

SWhat are the faotors,'Mr. Sharpe, upon-which the Court hai

b?.,d thia $50 an acre value:in most of the oaseo that have becn

L .~;, or an average of $50"an acre?

STATEMENT OFIM
H. . SHARPE, KBNNEBEC, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND
RALPH H. CASE, WASHINOTON, D. C., REPRESETINO THE
; STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE OF INDIANS.

Shr.
Sharpe. If it please the chairman, that value is

i:'.tvcd at by trial, in whioh both the Government, the Army

:i;;.nl-e Corps appears with :thoir attornb sand tho United State

' ' *o' .

 nREPOOUC(O AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVE 76

SIat1rict Attorney and the land owners appear with their

I:ttcrnies before a commission under the now rule of the United

Stataa Supreme Court to try by land commission or the juty,

hichvor
i the land owners or Army might move for. So they

i;,a tried those cases.

In those cases each .aide was able to present what you

;>.Jlht call.the highest and lowest values, and they could pro-

i .umc :;uoh ideas as productivity and the yields of the various

!crop3 and the use value of the land. And they could produce

Iv d nces for the market value of like land in the neighborho{

a3 to what it had been selling at. And there viould be some to

i Support the Army EngiiOers and some to support the land owner

SAs a result of the 12 or 4 excerpts oertified.by the

Clor: of the United States District Court which appear in the

Srocord now before you, gentlemen, it appears In round nur4boro

tholne -an at which.they decided these oases :as about 40 pgyient

Sabovo the appraisals. Other factors were develop ped ,cbhas th

troen of market values. por instance, they would put in evideoc

Sstatiotics of the United States Department of Agriculture .-

and it appear ir your recor' or-eo ds

o f-it -- showing-th -

iup1owng turn of market.values of lands. Some of these appraisO

Li~mCnt wore up .15 percent between the tirmo it wa3 appraised by

lthe Bureau and the date when they were having these trials.

iAndi all those things could be brought into the picture.

Therefore, those factors, plus the timber potential and

i
 'R(P AQAT&TH'E HbA=TAL6ARkIVAk7& 77

sevewcmce datraeo, and all .thee itoe.s, were developed in m110h

niorc detail than you could *.possiblydo before this committee,
ai1though there are record in here that would show all of
th-Nio details I am now reciting. Some are in tho consolidated
'atejmont I filed and others.
Does that answer your question oufficientlyj, r BerryT.
.T-xhot, going into a lot of ,detail?
E r. Berry. Without going into a lot of detail,, on :ge
1i o1' the !URBI report if, we assume we did the right thing
'.41t.ho Cheyenne, the Congrese allowed $2s250oOOO'fOr the land.
1: 1.ii13I appraisal on the Chyenne was $2,053,000. In other
*~'1,Congress raised it, about $200,000.
le it not a i'act that the IWWI report shows thereis near.-V
'Atimoo as manj crop land sores qn Standing IHo~k a h

It'. Shar'pe. Sure. Crop land io-the big value. That is

i,.TVJOO-an-acre land, I used that reportin this coneoidt
t 1,n
Imade to the Oomittoe. .oiae

1.1. Aspinall. 14r. Chairman, I-am a little bit befutddled

"t 10v-eI. e -are- talking -about -the -lands -that, are--taken, -not
.bout the lands that are in the area. Do yoU mean to toll me

;L:T-re five,times as many acres or crop lands?

Mr. Sharpe, The"Congressman is correct. There"Is. not 'rIV
*1Al,:o-a as many taken.
z;.Berry. 6n page 31. of report No. '13$, you got an Idea

A
 MIEPROOLRE0 AT THE'NATIOtLAL k~cHI YES /
tif foi).'noe in -*oluation.

Mr. vti otu yQStinH'Berry.N

11n0l
quftion i:flwiicmr and66beng taken intia tand

rea -than -in-the thoyenne area?

n~e AsI undesodyut

it 16 five ticeD as uoh.

1.1r. Berry.N,'.op-ad.In other wordir, thobia.

lan t~'n imber land On $aci3Tokta
;~'.ch ~orecro

~ heene Coenuhas narrowbto ads hz yUZI

Ad up on, Standin l', i idex ott

r.Aspiflall. I gux'sfv io smc rriid

lip. Berry'. Waitu mnute*Ta stme. IO oe

c rop, land o h ~dn ok 0on6.6. h6y~e u

-a qurter times., 19.0,010 'eres o.tmero tndibgA661c

11,000 onl Cheyenne' .v rAzing land ithereaia 9 "'00006

acrs

a>j compared ith"1 501',0OO.

1L.AsInal 1:or ositiefl is- thatfo me.eono

ft~ethre is not tW.)right relAtionshiAp of th' arounit -Of m

.13Seot-forth
't in . bilas thero-was- in the Chey~bhnf bl
~cwoyou have an .'Areajse from $4'856,OW0 whieh the Btlreai~'"U_
pop" SSto $10 ,1)-) whiah .this bill i"tself 'provid~s -for.
ir the .genlemsn . rom South'Dak t 10 corr00t - n

i.ono reason to douf); tha t he is not oorreot -- amphei

*~ there must be -in equitable Liguro, -but most orafl

.: equitable f igilro i s not been round here at ti ~s in

r.Brry.- We 9 talking onily about the land, are -we noll?

 n the, MWUX table 1 on,,,page 24i, the i f66urk i iV6r BasInl
r
~twhich'tiado thib" sUrV*Y fiJur~d- the lanid on standing
~okt1,613,_000 acresu h aisabout t~g-plj18. The Indian6s

ir. Aatpiflal. _ndthe Dureauisuotig*)94

Nr Berr~.Weei ht

koi.Apinal Tht-i8. what we" hAd 14Monday foraAtiBtiit

-W At

111. Berry.@ d10%,no wgr ~ o~igt thi fi! we

W~. e' Will he rtlr.nil?

i'.Sick. 1fih dIto atnuerot Thy$o

'ais.

au an iin6iraso 0o9.pro P ent or a lI kb 'alhtin

~.ivo to Cheyenno,. That is where they

~~A~s' othiitO.

tinot correct#, IrApinll?

epnal.Ithink you are corct.
Ii,

I.Sick. I i riured 'it'on a flat tenpercent,', whitch ueuld

.1"up to $1,14-0799,,,.baaed on that a ame f iguro .

o~tI,_l about' theae apprN1ailsin view of your statement,

1V11-h I am sure is' correot, t thn value of --the land: whti;-

'W-11ho0,taken iilthioeStafldilgRook area'i~ uhgqtrO

acra ibcoauso it- is-crop land and 5tanding~timber -ahd so, on,,I
 -REPPMO E~AT THE NATIOt L- ARH IVE

riX.il tolundrsitand' why thezxe was -noV&orOate r Iconsideorait"il of

vi3t~von in teappraia' by the HieOWAriBasin 0eopl.

1-7,., Ord$ , certninlyit apparenitly Is not-4eflec-teod in hi

40i)3,wuld' you say?-

mlr. Belky- It is o crtain extent bcue5,0

-is rigj6d to be val~ed 'at $1.6 million. io, 0acrea

X~vo lued at $2 ilin little over*_ S, there san eight

~1l~iradite'ftilIin" hir-acro -value, in-th6i iursi

'-rapprtisal.
mr. Sisk, I 6ppreoi6tO there is somedi'errae but 'it

~:~~~yis not nearly as much difreronce as there -shoUldhdVc

0'xVn in view of the ,faet'there, were three times -as much of the0
*.MZ4 priced. land s1iiertn tfo tejet oy-hero
reort. hat-appraisal should have,bee
;a~dthe u ihr

i.!.zij1ing there is three time-8as much' high p'iodlnO",S6tho'"

lwsin CheyOnne. 'Maybe I a'm not making MYsefcea. do 66

urderstnnd why, on the basie of 'that,' their appraisall wa not

much hither than" it-,as. -

Mjr. Brry, I annot' answerth 't;-either, eoxcept that yo

i will find the same thing r hi pria of the inhtangibles,1l

St'.o. They have not taken ,ito considera tion 'tiber valQ'6 abd-
in my judge.
wforth, I mean theyhave not -done it prop orly,
,.,mnt, in the OaAptk iz~atidnorl0 the value110-f the timAber.
hr Apia~..I -my cllague from 8outhDalkota yield?"
Mr., Berry. yes.
 4 rE~eW THE NATIONAL WRH~IE!

Ir. Asrpinall.. HaVe' they not' uted the sae f oruin aIW~
~3.2 (btorzinations for both'these tribes ausfir as the
o' alesiconcorned?
.~~a

Ihve onlA one iteret here. The question oidlar

:_-.-3Iot make any differenceoto Lie, because I thJink perhaps th(

nnore cnuo it and you can buildup--the eonomy -,of the trib.
!"u mot cortatnly -I do- notw to indirectly 0t 6 Sh

pcolioy different for the Standing Rook than we s alhd for''

I..~ Cheyanne, because there has not be enough time lbj)5bt

Oo that. I1think tatis- theo important argument in ara

Vt:A13particular matter is con'erned.

Mr. Sisk, Will the gentlemmn 1ild fuithe '?
Mr. Berry. Yes.3
14P. Sisk * - would certtainly like to concur iiith0 6 if t-
rvnt itiado bytegeleaVtm orao*Afr as dollarS,
X a not worried about 'thait-eithe'r. It isrmy nzrsolal desire
t'o aq ,a these people adequately taken cere-of in Vivi'0_of 'the

-itau I understand, thelvery heart or theiiroserVAti~io sr

<bainataken-from them,.as understood the chairman Mond'ay.

ctainly we should give it due consideration, But it'corn
* O,!a $

Cl~jqn to a matter'of'precedent, holt we have delt*Witho the r

hw e my oa'Vith tribes in the future das to the-
t.ooc,

of the mount we-give 'these 'people. nd tA sthe'""

Or1'j thing I am concerned, ibg-to be h16idio

-h.Xamnttr '

anrWAY.
a'l
 NATIONAL /iP.CHIVES-
AT T14E
IUP1~CCO

r'.Berry. Lot ua do thios: If we are g~ihg o seth

fCinur0in two years, let -us take v cc ount or'the facot "tha1
:11 two years the ourt&)aera these land- VaW atth

.,une -time-the pubih:4 raised -these land -vAUalue. 'nth

Choy,'nno they hav v 6,or

e six o&Isoo'nowi that- are.goingl to go

-,o court anyhow., But they cannot nettle6o the bnthait

und in t1he COyenno-ifla
Co:1,aszs ave them. -And there- iis 7no
from 4shioh Thi's money can'b akntowke'extra'payment. to

Vt' 60 five or six, Who are Oapeairkgto the court.,VI'We are

* oinr; to'do thWt- W6 went to- be aelta--we- vd ~e,

' -opie can-make so'ttlemeht out of the intngiblestr h

cu!Pforeno in thie value that the*ourt a e bv htw

0n t. Otleid ne,o-What: C yeno'eis actually do"ingnhow - an~

ihad better-'y, this'-off thie record.

(Disdusdion off' the record.)

Mr. Ber4,y We had better leave4-some-kind of looph~le'no
. they can go into 'the intangibles to make up -that-differencoe ik
Jio are going -to -proae4-by- that -formula.,

Mr. Aspinall. I sooeno reason why 'the geintlemnan oul'd ri

;put a proviso'in hero to pirovido 'for that. lrtaiihiy it then
Ce
Iputzs it',up-to teidvdaswoaesing fr-higther v6luess1*

la:; oppotied to the general -Interest'or"the tribe 'it they Jih-t6

::J-ceput that ran one b~i~t iho0ul d -aV1
But'I do'not believe you s
-, tip figure out 'of line wwt you have aready'est bii6id
2~ n1rtibe and -do--t eiwaly-oh the -argument -that- the iff13-
 OA T IONL ANIYet8

a' received a higher- Appraisal antid greater valu o' thagn

.ihbe
wa expected. -f you do that, all of them ar'goihg to tak
advantage Of It,
Dr.
Berr. If goon
w with that, then, Ifam go6ing ,to
ail 'c that you"do not' establish thatei tl it ointAn ~rig'

b-.cavso mome-'pUac we havesgot -to' take-into ai ount the

tiffrenceoin the rductiity 0uth
oftetaind. If e it ovof'

t thioit ngibles or t tibertheniti

--Vc -'you have bt-t ioo as many acres subject to Orodp lnd l
<I irrigOted. Yu oautake thi'ea 6roPs, of alfrl-a offf hit

t;,n irithout a drop of ranh., and -soro place

o e should reflec

* lta; in the 'piart.

f se .puit Sn the inrtangibles and do' not tie the in.
t,7 n:lblos up* sotht they cannot dig'! into -themU a lit
m-k-a ettloment, maybe that'woUld bo'all right.
Aspinll 1.r.You can make a first lien -againt -the
':Cnorol appropriation of i 6 miiliio0-1a Provided' in section 1$.

4r. Bjerry, -hat?

M
Mr. Aspinall. Makoa firtSt lienhaganht the i6Ini lio

appropriaton:,,that in prov4,ided in section 5 ,fofrrehaiblititiOI6 *1

Mr. Borry. We oannotgo Ito rehabilitation..

Mr. Aepinail.t You can it we say so. You are going to h& .6
IDoe th
tout h-re are not. satisfied 'with
that ctio -of ~On.
1ffreas-~-

~ ~
14t'~ ~ ~ oit~ nnnil$beu
~~~~~:
~ * herIwudrte
 tL
i :ou have got some baois for it. IC you go over -hero to
y~~'~o~blia ion Wmoyt itoesout of the rdaaur3y. Thid
:ij pni~d for by th6 e' df itldro heMi Uri Ji i hre ard

11r. A87pindll, You have VfUO. 17

if& ii*iii-t1
yo~u whichaver one' you want to choose.__
Nr. Berry'. Let: us ude ,the- ihntible's
Mr, Bisk,; Will-the gentlema&n yielf

In

ere, it seemd'as- though, w"ar,6talkfi4g-of a-difzeronco of

scathinging like m
millions'. -on'line 24, age2, your ,bi tallf
!' a total Of lO$O,63.ohg on the basid of' the OhoyeM ,i

't if we were using -the Cheyenne

-tis, aonPl,
n i~adin V
byr9 6 peroent f'would comte u apoito sih y'$4259,OG0:
~i-tead oft *O3
0 OO:Ifgue natnp ftebit oroatv.

fir, Bariry, That "is not' quite th i ;' The0-fisure- of,

A(.0 miilllon iindodes-the land and the intangileUbth.*
USok. I aprofit htM.Berry. And, o ours,
th~c $f,2799,OOO 'is juot fo0'r theo la&dprin and the othei s1

But getting back'to the baais-of the proposcA amendow-t

xc.In front of'us,' and tryi-Ang to bring 'it in Iline -With
~ some of te A particul rly i
-~gtatexists,

t~ie ~.'econimenatiosothDpatient, we have to consider' bott

 :I::;.~. Do tyou not agree,*Mr. Berry?
re Brry. Yea.

tri. Siok. Tho point' am trying to make is that,) bctl;Oen

6~ ;I ,0the$11,000aan -over-;al figue
and' for

~~_W:Ii ~n~i~ ilr

;i.dl2,ii.d, a ow rehro is a Justiib)o-- --

In thdre

2 wouldd lilto to ask the ohairmaan in view of his6viiit dowi

,anobservation. I have not iited it. 'ut' I ool, in -

to get along sdth the buossa smo way we ore going to

i v*' to o up tiith- fiague tht wfilol"b equ~iitable to the

r tnrd t'the son tie equitable and far to all tibe

kl ye boon paid in h aatand may be paid Sn the fut~fre.

SBorry. cannot Answer that,

IA,11, ono more step here -- and it i

if we take -- tflf
tin

ertendmont
;:a:l -- and.step into the intangible, le.ir the

an&ll valuo as it is,, there is no-way that yoU oan 4e~trmine

Ilfll)I
the of 000 -2,363,
3ak
3t8 for intangibles. BoqUqo#o- S
riguro~r's'wat epr
their own rigures'forinstance, hre is what reprt Ikon1,

eaa 29 esys -- The ageny etablibhd te valW ot'fih, ga:n

birda,plt, bigamy tkenin 19n,0n 486,160.

at50 They go on

to ay that, if that is capitalized t foui' porocnt, whidh

cconit6
eco11 will"- tell y is a smali igure to oapiitaliio
.Lt beoauoo these pople are losing that forever -- you capital to

lait fom% percent and y'ou geta'figure of $9,150;06just fOrt

ljaoc of their mildio.
 REPAQOUCEA-T THE tAO'NAL AikIYS (X

Gn pago 12 over horc they have not about $900,006ins~tead

S2.,150s 06 floiethey picked that out of th~ air' X'do o

'You take their fuel value. Take their own'Cigures d'- tue
r~u. n~age29 -No -,1241,they-.ay:i
-freport
"F~looding oft the valley and destruotion -of'the timber 01i10

a.leo deprive 0.1-nia fai i -or a souroi rf-

~ io~

Udla.corral poioa, and house logo, as well apototion for*

thoir homesteads, For the P'Ast ten yeiae,- agoe.ncy r cords eili
Wint 'anannual average or i6i million-board'feet or logo, 5812,
P01s,59.0931 posto, and !5,'9W4O'ords- or -fuel' wood Wore ,used by

Taking- their own f igurpa On "page 12 of report No.v 138j,

ani to the dollar value-or, those, -they say the 'VAlue W'a0
Super -houelog, $1 for corral- pOdlag, 5V0 cents fox post6-, nd
'$~
frcord 'wood.

5,94111 cords per year a $15 a ord, capitalize at four

~pwo~cent.. give$- you $2,-290',000 'for the Val'ue storfuel-$ 14

I hosmro t hn 87t- flme i oPapi ta XIze their -ow4n-

2~;-aw out- at fu ecn. You have, a total 'not or what-we

San~cing for, but you come up ,with "a,total - and I figured

1.;11AtnIght very carefully - you, come with a total or

*66l0on third nfiur -,andthat does- not _take into0

.onasld~ation anything for .rA igor anythif ~for U6 l1058odf,

pro taC tion thatt is golie forever.

 %_.,AEPW'cilOl C THENATIONAL AHIVES

r . Siak' M' Chrman, could X ask a quc'tiol orf the

Mir. HaeO. Off the -record.

(DCUussioinrff the reord.)

~h'. iraioil- viflig liotiied

-) to the v6r peraua e

2.'-t~ihO- C~rOS naUrnorits.iof t

the genitjleman frp 3oth Dakota 011'

tr )~ikelihO0 there may be some inoreaseul i t

ggestion-
irjdo t and I asit a8ub'tjtit8
: -;.'p.'

z~~on~rbof-t- that the fir oi tn2thio bottol or PAS

at

:*.be Changed *to read d that th- figure6npage

5*;'it45.7".3!,

S3 be changed 'd
to red 459'168,aaesuggeated by the Bureau.

lrirnt is on lino I, page3^ 41,59,16.

The addition tat i Made is, of course, ono'-halr'f t th
;ezJ t bten he two figOresopposed, -one in the bill-',6ne

4y t~o Bureau, on page 3, i~e 7, and dividodthatfigureo and

e Bureau's roormerhdatio0,nt kr
difference to tho
:that

I ino 24, paggo2.

might say to my'colleague that I wold ike to 'see a

Ipiv!uo then placed inthe billhbit there are any tide

h o I arewon by court action.,to" take care ortthe direct dwaa

Kw,-/- uhall be token from ,the -amounts for the int8r6gibi, t

K s:un, proposed intheointifa5lea.

thei
 -REPfOOIJED'AT W~E MI .CtiES
,lA

me.-Aspiuial1 mr. Chairman, I ask 'unanimous conent

'I
-,ithdraw the -amendmeont-whIch proposed.,

l. Hal eye b6requbest.

You have I hoard the Xe th'ore obj6c.'-
V

1410objotibu. It, is. 50 ordorod'

I;'Api~i. r.Ch-airimad, I ask'unuaLSmouS cOnont'

am
thvwn~n hc as suggested by tho"9 f Ifididii
V~io

nd proposed by the Chairman, ho wlthdinvne.

",9:~A
V'r. Ila ley. without' oectionit-is so ordered.
Mr
Api~l Nowt. himaroffer the. to 164W9n

.:13nevent Page 2t-line 24, atie$3O3O,6. insrt in

9

I~ thorbof the figure 4655,O.

LIVI.'I Ilaley. You have"'hoar d the Motion of the geniteman

'2 Colorado, is-there" Any discussions~?
All in-favor say-aye. -

it is so ordered. -i

r.Aspinkll; I otfferthe follo aen

-9wing ""'-N e 3

1-46o 7, strike the fgre $,2,t799;,683. Insert _#in !6u-eVthereo

k~r. laloy, You ave1ard-the amendment: All in favor

way aye.
All opposed, no.
it is so ordered.
I ould like to6 k uanluout' conoent o h outo't
 ATTHENAT IONALARCHI"VES
*AEAQ~ICE

vLkeup ORt5478.

ira,- Kutson. Iaok'*permiSbidfl to insert ysaoel

ihoutpbjot ionl, your aetntouont wllb

Ut'.nale.

placed in tercr tti~~n. .. 7 .

(atIle s0tatement preferred to i n~o~wt

5d
.3 'I

IL -

4.

*1.
~4
 4"4

Haleyo ON wl return t R56-,We *01 te

11P rProndnOnt'Ho..3, page 3, line0 15. Change the period-to n

cornta anid add:

"ProV
- iddfur thdrthat theb"alsnce of fsaidi Bun

j *1
ursantto'secion
iOappro "IatipU6 made
aha1I bedonriotidited with the
f thisactad sall be eXpond~

In accordance viith the provisions- of such snoctibon 5,

1-0t ke any discussion on that?
her

ir 'Ilorry.
M Mr. Cholirman.U-this i6 the thing we ivoro
3nat; talltoing kout,
* Iiiotfio). words -

I wilAl offeor the arieridnoit-No. 3. An X

Mlr. A60pitll.'
~-!n,i.nbor the 'd Issi yesterday, thero was no objection t
toio unonduent.
Mr*Bet. ost"is',not put -our Aintngfibles into txt
eabAll-tis os spti
dhLilits:tiOnfl money?pU
f 'Inds Into the 'rehsbIlfit i'flmoney, does it, mot?

Yes,*Mr. Chairman, that in, right. 'The

tire Sigler,.
int,,ng ible fUndWill1-be bconsol idsatedwith tha' rehabilitti-n
Zanmd and both expenided under the same Plan. Without the

pwov is ion there 'is nothinin It'he bill"that will iodicat

t~io intangible fund wl

~~ h~w eset

Mr. Brry. Mr; Ch lrmian t1k& thAtl t#y 'are 'going

uworlc Lan
Shava to'have seome m~oey .out of. Wthiintao'giblo-to

- vitt the rehsblittiou ,$certaiilAy-

 ATTHEATItAl UM, n
'REROOUm.CnD -

You cannot use rehm'Abi a i moey for ,a lot of t13gti

IL'o
'i~tue hywno o have a home fo r chtdr n of

bi .o)cora 'honos. They want to do 'that out Of thqsoo fudo,

doubt the sdV!isabii ty -o'f tyling this a--il'l ito r1 1U

14".);ion.Ihik thre
o obe o osome adththy aro

Iong to buy and -sond improvemonts''they wilriat'to r*OAR'j on

thds reservaion *andyo coid '0ot 'do' anhy oflt hat If it' Vill,

%To)did 'not tie th is' down* that way foir the- Ch6yonnoaI

Ii'. Si1gle I am vorry, Mfr. BoL'ry, I dco't rerombor,.1I

kVo did not.
Ytr., Aupin'all'. If-we'leave thebill nas it'is now,-they
):eper capita payments eOut- of it.
mnko,
Utr. Berry, They .can make porocapita pilyftntsj.

~.1 Aeptdall.o The gentleman does not wish that,'*deo

Fe Beorry#., . he same'time, there a*.

But""*it tO
1mr1!bar of things' tha~-t Itilmithoy 'should"do 'with-,thigs
;nnoy that they-,could nio t d' i itwas i oail'tol

Want the mooy 'prototed' er efntey

Anther'tAing that they could do with this money, i"f
-hoy could'find so*e induis~vy that I'ud acOoeInto the ra

3.2"thoy -put, up' a building sorntinj1ikO tha t, It.1

11 t dofinitely is 'tied in iith'roha1bilit~tIbfl, ut he could.

 K 1A
AT T~lE
.RPROU( IO*p
M I YES.. .

-z tnka rnhabllitfti n io;jsey to do that.

But yet, it voild be for the boeneit*of theosrveation

the
3uppno you put alf of iV U*Under oegl0t6ion o o

mr-hnblitition, and leavehal f it for the'dovolopa'ont of

oi

rrtorvation, do' you tlijjk tht wvou.ld meet with" their

-cvnl, Mr.' Case?

11. Cane. If.I got it cioar, I think I C'd, i think

they euld appAve. .'t least, me would reoommond it.

!:r. Dik,. In view of;thtlte 'statomont ado by' Ur.; Bigler,$iV!-

:-,vdcrnnnd now, if that proviso doos' not go in thoro, or

-i;othing along that linesho. a0e. You going to apond-'thot.

11'I undoretood hi, 'there is no proviso for' phyiog-l

,,A.-, t onoy.

mr. Berry., No..

yr . Bisk. 'I would like'to have Mr, Sigler restate his'

' fors that arnndoront.,,

mr. Siglor. Without proviso,

rhe wat'Ithlik I's"

oA,, at leost, what I intaoudad to say, was -that.thro ould bo

;Icthig in tho b l indicate in what mann-r themoney.

lzould be spout.

roxiovor, I should have-,added that that loavos it o'oM

-.dIotoly open-endod, V o tibe a-on opond it'for any purposo

thelymnted to ith sooroterial approval.

'

- . . . . "
 AT TE NAIORAL ARCHIVES.
EOWWC

I think t he 'SuggeDtilob' that was mentioned o beoeia thi

C,:v)that ought to ho onphasized. -This b% is16aimed or imn i:L'

1.0 P~evonting per capita pyet out of .tho "Iitabiblo fund'*,'

thi nk the department would like not. to. be In a pot1 o-
of boing under prossuro to approve disbursomonts' for such
iun sprcAit out of a fund of .thin kind.,

Tho reason f or our ouggootion that' it bo lunpod with thu

nbil'itt tion fund is that rehabilitation in a very broad.
z:-1
: w;oatid I am not'aware of anything that could not bo donor

-ce- Vntat 1abilitt ormthat ttibo io planning

*ZotCo, but I cannot 'Opo k definiilytth..
Mr . As pin-all. Why would we not acomoplish the eno
-,-n by saying further that no-part--of the blae
.'o.do
0& said sum shall bemused for per capita pAYcients"?
mr.siglor, That certainly would prevent the per capItaB
Hr. AspInall. Then theoorotary would ihave'-to M lthd
trdtorilftnation on iiuo to,timo as to the' maber In whioh- It

%iouldho used.

it th iitily
wish to put t into the robabilitto und'by
icouudil a wtio,oore'tarial approval -they -could, do-It,
I ,:)Ulcdthey-not?
iir. Siglor. Yos. ' rhat is another. alternative , tr.

You see, the 'department. Viev"in ,that t)Ais funidfo%%

 9EPcO Ar 08 K

intnnIblos l goammaa otney that thd -tYibe boB 'to'

uno for any purpose Tho Congress will permit. it to uno It,'

-#loutthe rohabiiatin rogram is oed

0 ndt 1po

Soconomic and sodial sithtus of th' tIOe in Any waY osbf

~ ic ~ boad bockc. B3ut your suggo!tion,t~ ike

!;.00(4 one.
Mir, Borry,, You could not'take rohabilitation money and
Invos t it In'lands'.for the tribe, o0ouldyou?
~ M r. Sigler* I think you could, Sir. norry, For OXAMPl14),

YOU nontioned a homeo for "homoless children. it seems to ne

i~ta tould be a logiti O~a of rohabilitiatilig thoso

Mr. Asplnil1. Yo9, but if'you could do that, -youcol

"oout and buy the, wholo iroaorvatioh -

- hr. iglor., oraprpone that lB designed to improve

tko eooi tt ofti6tribe.-

* Mr. Berry. I have bion under the 'impressi on-a ll-the

tat hs
*~'~i~o ability* "f
mny'is more for theopl

ofthe tribe, That Is' ielinIaea n all tis

ii iork that tbat'-r 6 it MnrY cannot be put Into

:t vRi
*anything that is land ubUlss it is a loan. You could' loan At-

ito RU Indiabn antid take a mortgage backt,or somthibng 1li tt

but tot to 'buythe ianhd iroot,
 t TIE HATIQUAL APHIV&S
UCCbOIEO

llr, Siglor. I do not have that understanding of robab!1!--

t. 0 1 I do agreed thnt,'for tho u'st part the omphasia 1413
ndviu~~loorfa__
uo~n 4P but the actual' takrmused In our.

,- ecommnation about rohablitation lnug

:.Sisk, in line with w.hot the' gontl emckofrom Colowadc
o;o n bout por capita.;paymont you suggostcd 'in your
11 on page 86 lino 9, wih rforonco to tho
I~&:rtol.
:;*d:U1itntion fund, the sxtea-llindolrt;, YOU

---n -itocI nn amonduent that_ provided forthor no part of such

Vod -ill be used for car.opita payaonte
:1ihy would that not luff ice in roference to. thin Other
arA iLi tilat -way I think youa would havoc no restriction on the
! W~xr-'-.ont -that it could wt-bo ue for per capita paymnts.
i'r. Sig lor.I I think" that was Congressman.Aspiflall'1Bf
on~ugetion. It goes part ofthway. I don't know that I can
eocjlain. it any further than the purpose to 'give Slone Con-
.0-.rons.4tonal guide,, andhow-the money is to ho used. Rh a bilitt-

tion io the* broad program that 'we feolt'"t~is fund, shoulId7bqe

*uci 1to further. I'think that Is all I can suggest on it.
isr. Borry. The eoliditor told'us thatit washiune.
: tanding that'the rehabtiiation money'could not be used for,
building up the reservation. so we could protect It If we
-took balf of 'it and put At' Into rb iitAtion; and lofit half

of it to ho for thoe purpoi~e of land.

*(Didduabion off the' record)
 .lPOUED AT THE MAQIORAL WH~CIM.~
100

iiL. aley. Are you gont1'dien'ready to' propose.such.

P~roviso?

Hir, Aspinall. .1 offer the fo61leiowg, amondent as -a

LU1stituto for thoe au~ndiMientIo.3 as -proposeod by the bureau,
"ProVide'd further' that aea -of- tbef und of

oa'id/cousolidGt6dfor--appropifatioIns made puriuuabt' to

Section 6 of this1act shall2: bo'expended in
accordance neitli t orv n e~o~' n
uc ao
that no part of teraifilng.6io-half of such fund
shlf 14-6oId
e for per*4apita paymontijii
m.
r -H Iou'hive heard the sukbtitute apoedst-
loy.Yo
:orod by the goitloman fl 0~~t
Clrao Yuhae
;usion.
All in f04vor say, aye...

All opposed say'no. .

X s so ordor4d.Y..
* Aiondmaint proposed byj partmont to. 4:
110 a ge 4, line'9, insrtdrtor 'all'the word

Without objectibn the' amondmant is-agreed-to.

41 Atondmont'No. 6l on page 4, delete 1inoo 1sliihough

Ufr. neriry. What Wtdoes Is, tako out a bunch f6f.roads h-

At-

at 50 uggste -)ith "d' rmen - banotwad a t-d

 .REPAouEO AT*.liE NAM~TN

10)1

Har.ley. Without oljection, tho amOndibout i6 agreed

ArmondmntNo -',0:
110A pa ge' 5,lines 10 and 11, the fi"Wsite
oiiion'dollars shoulld be Nodified t' r ota:-
grossilona1, dorzintiono the' approptato amount for'
d rehabiiti purposes.
"For purposes of'.comparison, your attoution is8
'iroctod to tho fact, that Public Law 7700' Bighty-'Thid
Coougrovs (68 Stat. 111), author izod an appropriation
of $8,100,000 for- the rehabilitationn -of mombers of the,
Rv~ Trbbbo resided within tho reservation,
ihoono
hich-amounfttoapproxmtl 2,20pr-esn

1)ixteoenmilion dolIaiso for theorehal1filition of

iombors of the Stand4_9 Rook Sioux Tribe who. reside
Other on or o'ff the rieservaion, mbich amoubts. to.
upproximately:$3,7.00 per portion (for- 4$324 persons)..;
Both. sums kae n add ition -tothe Bums authorized 'to bo
tippropriated for,-indirect damages and -for tfe :vA~iO 6f
tribal'-lands'.
what-is your plaeure6?
tar Asinal. r.6taima,,of for theofolloi~iAM~aOn

...- .--.-~
 *REPAOOREO
EFNEIATION~AL A5PCHv.

-0o5, linen 10 and 11, strilico, the, fiigure sixten

million dollars; insert In lieu thereof $6,65OO,000,,,,,
(Discuna iou, off the'.record)

mite Bioko *hat 1is the total number'-of morboro- of

Vho Etanding fook Reservation-residinag n the' rosorvation'

Mr', Bigler., I must, APOlogiz, he figures I gavo you'

S(lay baforo yesterday veroiho boat I had 'At the time,. but we
11-wd since gotten curent figures, at least our best estimate
0-41current figuroal, and that figure is thirty-six' hundred,
1ppnv oxinatelyy,.-living on, tho resorvation.-
Tho total enrollment t is 3,303.

mr. 'Aspinall. Ur. himans I ask unauqus contsent t9

ti
ut" deraw my-awedmient.

W!. Haley. Yithout;'obfjecon oamndent-offorod by

L!,ntlemawn rr:os colorado Is withdrawn.'

11r, Asj~inflI , ow pUt. Chairman,*i of for the following
8Ond - out:

On page 5, Ineo 10' and, 11,striko'the figure asixtoen,

i:.i-Alon dollars and-insert '-in liou theroof "the figure

Hay I sayl, *r.Cha tat isa

-n.that ltl 1 a

C-*a~urov but.'that voul d t ae care of what- MIjMi be cons iderted

tlao usual"inc es ythwiiowegettaround to get.-tist
vcOnoy fa1lo00ated*.%
U The Chaitpath. %'ou-have heard'.the'.amondimont oftet'edb
 10 THE NATIONAL ARCIIVES7 10

,.-n~uufrom colorado.-
.~thore any discussion?
J1ll1 in .favor say ayo.
P,11-opposd no,, -.

it isS
so ordered, 4

on page 5, line 14, -delete "rohabtitioi 'd" n f

in liou thereof, "Dovelopipg individual" and''famIly '1no,

relocatin~g, roestiblislfing and, providing other assae
dosigrnod 'to help improvethe ecoootsc and social status o41.
In thore any objootifon to,-the 'amendment?
All in favor say aye. -

All opposed, nto,

4 It'is ac ordered.
Auendhaont ?o. 8, page;,,, line*.18, delete the comma and
03~ roivaindor of the sentouco that-precedes.the colod'in,

xS there any object int

'ihoro is no olijoction;j. it'IsN so ordered.,
on page G0, line 4, chbinge "115"to -"10".o
*r thore any objection to, the proposed amendmont?

Vi.Afspinaftl1,.*This brings, us .Inline with the Cheyeiin''

r.Ltaf. Asa', actlc aI matter.' theoy are goingt

lotul-on th adjwtii>n'a~o'it d46es not vake

m ubit

4 4 ~ 'q

4 . A
 iRPAOUEOAT THE NATIONAL ARC nE /04

MIV.Haley. Is there anyojcinttoawdunt

There is no objoctioi..
Pago 0.i:nos 6 to -O*Irthe, auondwent you hn~lvo before- you.0
grr. Aspin all,,, r.'CbaIianthere Is A question of
"0o1ny., As I remember' the,.explanat ion, yootordnyq I pould'llk(
111-1gont lotil" from south"Dakota to restate his; roasonfi for
tho proving tORAt is to 'b6 strickeout, by this amendmont.A.
me, Haley. is thioeoany further discugsiofl?,
Isthee any bjection to the auondmont as propod'y
btho ropartment?-U

Th9-Cha ir hears the amendment is aidoptod.

.ooand

ir.Sisk*' Beforoewi O section cUldIuk

prtatomont?'
In viewof .the faot now that we have suggoated tho
' of the funds o. est'aside-for riohabiitt ionbdsbd-
roits

piiari ly on the-'fig .ures-,of those residing"on the reservation ,

Ianondring whther there should not be ooclaritafiaionli

!no to whotWr'*o r'ot thls going tobe;exponde4.cy 4for.

;tho"u.) ivii'g o6n the'"reservation -,.or' for .the ent ire t~o
0
As' I underatand -itnow the.,provision*leaves ,it w.1do '

it would app 0to anyone -*nrollef1 inthe Standing Rocwk Tibo. _

v ould!'Iiko to ask !you,:or Aksk'&i'p.~igleor,,.to'cormont
So $.In' ieu o the fa6tthat, we bUVO se t -- figure,
pa
 . I
AT THE NATIONAL AKRCHIVt.~
0APOUE

/ ~odon ths 13reIng onte reservation, I thiik thed

irrashould rjako a detornvdntiLon now as to'vhother'or not

it choulci apply to'those on or off the reservcttionf or
11er. it is to -sppJky, only to those on -the roerituion.
ro I understand that 'the Cheoyenne bill'.p~~ only 'to
S;h-zo on tho reservation?
~:.Aspinall. Yes.a-
r, 13orry.
-.. Is there not another section that applies
;that?
Haloya.
.1ir. Ur. 81glet, would you care to comment on

2r. Sigler,1, thiink i.Sik is right. tho'billns it

-; p.'montly draf ted, plis o noeonrolled in "the tibe
-h'avor theylie
Tho Cheyenue River Aot. is restricted to theo residents of

Ito la purely.'a.. question of policy on whther you want thij

r(Aa 1)111t atlo'n fund restricted in-Cheyonne or broadened-'as 4it
is oi
03 rittou here. *

LV., Aspina04.40 erooudyou suggest' t t bo&U4

ront be placed? .,

S.Mondment 'should 'be placed?

ur si8gl-or.NYou,, moan'redtri~t- to w; the'reservation?,
Mr. IlaleyI0

Z-' z
 AT THE NLATIONAL ARCHIVS.
[aPQOJE

11r. 8isk. Mi Chairiaa, while hoeisoheok~pg"Aha,

iiruld like to' ask kr. Barry a dea'tlon,
In it -your thinking that with reference' to thi'6 proviso
U0 Should foll10" throuhaotoCeenne bill, or Is thor6
arilar reason it'should, bo broader in %hle case?
soro
HIx.Berry. Ali- those tlitving off the o'-or~utlon weo
vary unhappy about the Chieyenne bill. Thabt is the 'reason
it has not boon Included to hero.
(DiecUssionroff, the record).

fir.Sisk, I appreclitewhat you have in4 wihd.

h1,3ttot leaving It up to.'the othor',body t6writ . i~o 1,090
Ilatlon. I do'thnk thi s is -the place-to make suoh* a- dotcr'td..

rr. lHtcalf. The computation which vas made on tho

:x ~bblitfttion fund'was based on the fact that It,
was only
4o bo distributed to the Peol, ntersrainadi i

.CtI I flact we'ade the'decision-there,-I think w6 should' ti6

;doiin bore, ..orwrVerthre -anappropriate' laoqo for
iiting the' decision, as8-to 'Wing- diatributod only fr"bbl

~;iq maviong the

6 thir7'ty-naihundrod,. rather thathe'fifty-tlt 00

-(DiDooussIon ff thoe record)'

H~.Aspiuall T ask, Unanimous oaoent'to return 'to.th
:call. dcraiIon,o"f-'wki~.a~kotaii th:-ur att endmnti No.
 AME kgfA TV TOAAC4V$

-~;'1iacawe have just had -action,

if I got unftnimous consent# I woill make a notion 'to
i~r!ethose lnos.
ua'. jaloy. You bavo hoard tho request fron the gentlolda'a
11,0roturn to' It,
Tit n tlengmatn Is recognized.

r.Aspipall., I offeir the following .aweadmont

Pa goe61,li0e&t. strike the colon after the word noti,

aadiaSnsort a poriod in'lieu thereof, and strike thlo' b~luoO

of tho paragraph., ,

* IP. 14,10y, You have #eard the amondriont. is thoro any'

diccuassIon?

without objection-the ame&pndment is agrood to.

r
L a.isk. IHibat we vot-hoar from Mr. Siglor-'no to vliett
uri
ha hr.( an amendmentt to proposed.
miz'S iglor. I u no whore we miight
ertodyuaked

~plaloo aL%
amendmn* you.wanted to restrict it to -the

~rosoirfltiol*, MY sugeqon would ho on page ,line lotastr ik

J tho orE; ar6 enroled memtors of the taidlig Rpak '$ioux

iVtinlo~thoreof "resdn
U, lbo", and li",h.on siding the resorvA-'

ton".
14 hat will make 'tbe wehabilitation.-fund available foral
=-~tbra of sAIT tribeo who'reside on the reservation atth
1 of passage of thisat
0

fir. Aspinalo It.ii ma the legisblation cbonform to,

-4
Al
 -- 4F

T~H IOL&L
'RPOOCOAT* 6ciiV, 18

.o viions of tlio Ch10Oynno bill, no I undersitand It.

I~r. Sigler. Thlt is.4y undorstan d1131, too.

?fr. eioht. Mr4 hairman,. I will offer, the amonduont as

rod9y'r. . Strikethe words beginning ith the
0lr
viord "aro", line AS' to the word "tioln 1,adisrt

-*3n liou ther&-f "reside on, tho* resrtin.'

Hr. Haley. 'You; have heard thoe ameuetioeod by the
Sgontlaman from California.-'
is thoro any obJectioq,'to the amndment?
If not, the ameidmonti is.adopted without objoction.
I1.Aspluall. 1 offthe odmente 11,g-12, and 13 on*

banc. I have n6 objecttion" to thorn.

ar9 ialeyq4 You have heard tho request of tVe geutlomon
Pi ron Colorado.

Without objection the requost of the gentleman from-

SCo1"-Nado Is adopted.

Thatapplesto'amendments 11, 120 and 13.;

'rho subcommittee wilf4,receass until' 10:006-o look tozotirvoof

(Thereupon, at 1:5pmthe subcounritteo va a

rooeaooe,to roconveno at100 'oknm,

Thuraday,.Fobruary 2, 1050)