Acute Exacerbations of COPD - Clinical History and Effect of Frequency and Severity On Risk of Death

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

B15 COPD EXACERBATIONS AND READMISSIONS / Mini Symposium / Monday, May 22/9:15 AM-11:15 AM / Room 207 A-B (South

Building, Level 2) Walter E. Washington Convention


Center

Acute Exacerbations Of COPD: Clinical History And Effect Of Frequency And Severity On Risk Of Death

K. Rothnie1, H. Mullerova2, J. K. Quint1


1Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, 2GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Uxbridge, United Kingdom

Corresponding author's email: k.rothnie@imperial.ac.uk

Introduction
Although acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are important events for people with COPD, their long-term natural history and impact
on mortality have not been sufficiently studied in representative cohorts. We used a population-based cohort to investigate the effect of
AECOPD frequency and severity on risk of future AECOPD and death.
Methods
We identified 120,334 patients with a validated diagnosis of COPD 01/01/04-31/03/15 from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink
(CPRD) with linked hospital episodes statistics and office of national statistics death data. We defined moderate AECOPD as those treated
in primary care and severe events as those requiring hospitalisation. During the baseline period (first year of follow-up), we grouped
patients according to number and severity of AECOPD during this year (0-5+ moderate events, and 1+ severe events). We followed up
patients from the end of their baseline period until 31/03/15 or death.
We used Cox regression to investigate the effect of baseline AECOPD number and severity on risk of death adjusted for age, sex, smoking
status, and GOLD grade of airflow limitation.
Results
More than half (57%) of COPD patients did not have an AECOPD in the baseline year. Of these non-exacerbators, around a half did not
exacerbate at all during follow up (up to 10 years, Figure). Patients who never exacerbated throughout the baseline and follow-up periods,
had similar distribution of grades of airflow limitation compared to the general COPD population (Grade 1: 16% vs. 15%, Grade 2: 53% vs.
50%, Grade 3: 26% vs. 30%, Grade 4: 5% vs. 7%). Compared to non-exacerbators at baseline, those who had one moderate event at
baseline period didnt have a higher risk of death (adjHR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94-1.11), but those who had two or more events did (2 events,
adjHR 1.19 (1.08-1.32); 3 events adjHR 1.34 (1.18-1.52); 4 events adjHR 1.49 (1.28-1.75); 5+ events adjHR 1.91 (1.69-2.15)). Those who had a
severe event in the baseline year had a doubling of risk of death (adjHR 2.21, 1.98-2.49).

Conclusions
In this primary care population-based cohort, we identified a group of COPD patients (27%) who do not seem to exacerbate, even over up
to 10 years of follow-up. 'Non-exacerbators' have a similar risk of death to those who had one moderate AECOPD at baseline period.
Having two or more moderate events or one severe event during baseline period is associated with increasing risk of death.
Sponsored by MRC and GSK (WEUSKOP5893)

This abstract is funded by: This study was supported by the Medical Research Council [G0902135] and GSK [WEUSKOP5893].
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195:A2888
Internet address: www.atsjournals.org Online Abstracts Issue

You might also like