Density Wave Like Transport Anomalies in Surface Doped Na Iro

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

.

Density wave like transport anomalies in surface doped Na2 IrO3


Kavita Mehlawat and Yogesh Singh
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali,
Knowledge city, Sector 81, Mohali 140306, India
(Dated: April 4, 2017)
We report that the surface conductivity of Na2 IrO3 crystal is extremely tunable by high energy
Ar plasma etching and can be tuned from insulating to metallic with increasing etching time. Tem-
perature dependent electrical transport for the metallic samples show signatures of first order phase
transitions which are consistent with charge or spin density wave like phase transitions recently pre-
dicted theoretically. Additionally, grazing-incidence small-angle x-ray scattering (GISAXS) reveal
arXiv:1704.00263v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 2 Apr 2017

that the room temperature surface structure of Na2 IrO3 does not change after plasma etching.

I. INTRODUCTION II. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

The single crystals of Na2 IrO3 were grown using


5d transition metal oxides (TMO) are candidates for
self-flux growth method described in detail elsewhere8 .
novel magnetism1,2 . In 3d TMOs, electron correlation
Reactive-ion etching (RIE) technique was used to mod-
(U) is the most significant energy scale. However, for 5d
ified the surface of the crystals. The freshly cleaved (in
TMOs such as Ir-based oxides, spin-orbit coupling (SOC)
air) crystals were bombarded with high energy Ar plasma
becomes comparable to U and plays an important role
(in vacuum) for varying periods of time ranging from 0
in determining the electronic band structure and mag-
to 30 min. The parameters used during plasma etch-
netism. For example, the novel Jef f = 1/2 state in the
ing are given in Table I. The surface structure of the
perovskite iridate Sr2 IrO4 arises from splitting of the t2g
crystals before and after RIE was checked using grazing
level due to spin-orbit coupling3,4 . Sr2 IrO4 has garnered
incidence small angle x-ray scattering (GISAXS). The
a lot of recent attention due to its structural, electronic
transport measurement have been done using a Quan-
and magnetic similarities with La2 CuO4 2,3 . Recently
tum Design physical property measurement system. The
insitu surface electron doping by potassium deposition
etched surface is found to be very sensitive to ambient
has been achieved, and it was found that Fermi arcs,
lab environment. The change in the transport behaviour
pseudogap, and a low-temperature d-wave gap exist for
of etched samples is not permanent and reverts back to
these samples demonstrating properties in complete anal-
insulating behaviour on exposure to ambient atmosphere.
ogy with the cuprates57 . These studies on Sr2 IrO4 sug-
The lab exposure time required for the samples to revert
gest that properties of other iridates might also be highly
back to their original behaviour depends on the time they
tunable. Recently the layered honeycomb lattice Iridates
were etched for. For example, samples etched for longer
A2 IrO3 (A = Na, Li) have been recognized as spin-orbit
time v 30 min and 40 min, degrade very fast, within
assisted Jef f = 1/2 Mott insulators1,810 . The magnetic
about two hours or so. Whereas, the crystals etched for
frustration observed in these materials is argued to arise
10 min degrade in 1 to 2 days. Additionally, it was found
from the presence of dominant bond-directional Kitaev-
that transport properties of the crystal surface opposite
like exchange interactions with additional Heisenberg ex-
to the etched surface remains unchanged. These observa-
change present10,11 . Recent predictions have been made
tions suggest that only the surface of the Na2 IrO3 crystal
of novel states emerging on doping the Kitaev-Heisenberg
is modified and most likely only a small depth close to
model. These include topological superconductivity12,13 ,
the top of the etched surface is affected. Unfortunately
spin/charge density waves, electronic dimerization insta-
the depth of the surface layer affected by the RIE is un-
bilities, and bond order instabilities14 . This motivated
known. For this reason we present electrical transport
us to explore the properties of doped Na2 IrO3 crystals.
data as sheet resistance.
Conventional doping in the bulk has not been success-
ful so far. We have however, recently discovered that the
surface of these crystals can be doped by Argon plasma III. RESULTS
etching15 . In this paper, we reproduce surface doping
of Na2 IrO3 crystals using reactive Ar ion etching and re-
port temperature and magnetic field dependent electrical A. Crystal Structure and Chemical Analysis
transport studies on these RIE treated Na2 IrO3 crystals.
We find anomalies in the electrical transport properties The grazing incidence small angle x-ray scattering
which are consistent with spin/charge density wave-like (GISAXS) were done on the crystals before and after
phase transitions or structural transitions in these surface the plasma etching. Results of these measurements are
doped Na2 IrO3 crystals. displayed in Fig. 1. GISAXS reveals that the overall
2

70
TABLE I. Summary of Parameters used in high energy argon
(a)
plasma etching parent(unetch)

. 60 10 min etch

Intensity (arb. units)


flow of Ar gas 80 cubic centimeter per minute at
standard temperature and pressure 50
Chamber pressure 80 mTorr
RF power 200 W
40
RF bias voltage -500 V
Temperature 15 C - 20 C
30

TABLE II. Average chemical composition of the expected el- 20


ements from energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
. 2 (degrees)

Exposure time (min) Average (Na) Average (Ir) 70


(b)
0 1.78 1 parent(unetch)
60 30 min etch
10 1.73 1

Intensity (arb. units)


20 1.68 1
50
30 1.62 1
40

surface structure of the crystals does not change after 30


plasma etching. A notable change is for the high an-
gle peak (32 - 34 ) which shifts to a smaller angle in 20
the plasma etched samples. This suggests an increase
in the unit cell parameters. This however, could not be 10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
quantified with the current data. The depth D probed
2 (degrees)
during the GISAXS measurement can be estimated us-
ing the relation D = dsin, where d 1.25103 cm FIG. 1. (Color online) The grazing incidence small-angle
is the attenuation length for this sample at the used X- x-ray scattering patterns for Na2 IrO3 before and after Ar
ray energy of 15 keV, and = 0.1 is the x-ray incident plasma etching for 10 minutes and 30 minutes plasma etched
angle measured from the surface of the crystal. The esti- crystals.
mated depth comes out to be D 20 nm confirming that
GISAXS is probing the surface structure of the samples.
Since the thickness of the surface layer modified by the for various time periods, are shown in the Fig. 2 and
RIE is unknown and probably depends on the exposure Fig. 3. Figure 2 (a) show the versus T data of the
time of plasma etching, D estimated above can be used unetched Na2 IrO3 single crystal between T = 50 and
as a lower limit. The chemical composition of the etched 305 K. The (T ) data confirms the insulating behavior
surface was determined using the energy dispersive X-ray in the Na2 IrO3 sample as has been reported earlier8 . Fig-
spectroscopy (EDS) on a JEOL scanning electron micro- ure 2 (b) shows the sheet resistance Rs versus T data for
scope (SEM). The results from this analysis are shown in the 10 minutes etched crystal recorded while cooling the
Table II. From these results, we can conclude that Na is sample down from T = 305 K to 2 K and while warming
being progressively removed from the surface of the sam- back up again. The Rs (T) versus T increases on cooling
ples with increasing exposure time to the plasma, which from T = 305 K and reaches a broad maximum around
leads to hole doping at surface of the crystal. T = 100-200 K. Below the maximum Rs (T) behaves
like a metal with a weak T dependence. This unusual
behavior of transport is consistent with expectation for
B. Electrical Transport topological insulators where the insulating bulk domi-
nates the transport at high temperature and the surface
Due to the unknown geometrical factors involved in states start contributing at lower temperatures when the
the measurements, we present electrical transport for the bulk gets gaped out. Such a topological state has been
etched samples as sheet resistance Rs in the units / sq. predicted for the Na2 IrO3 under certain conditions16,17 .
A square sheet with a sheet resistance of 10 /sq will The slight hysteresis in the warming and cooling curve is
have a resistance 10 . not understood at present. We note that at the lowest
The sheet resistance Rs versus temperature T data of temperatures there is a small increase in the resistance.
the pristine (unetched) samples and the samples etched We believe that this weak upturn is arising from weak
3

200 295
(a)
(a) 20 minutes etch
unetch sample
290
H = 0 T

150 285 H = 1 T

H = 3 T
280

/ sq)
H = 5 T
cm)

H = 7 T
275
100 291

(
s
290
270 warming
4
(10

R
289

/ sq)
265 288
50

Rs (
287
260 286
cooling
285
255 284
0 180 200 220
T(K)
240 260 280

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 250


0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
T(K)
170
20
140
(b) (i) (b)
cooling

/sq)
120
Rs

160
100
fermi liquid fit
cooling
15 80

60

(
Rs
warming 40
/ sq)

150 20
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 warming
10

/ sq)
T(K)

6
(

140
s

(ii)

/ sq)
R

(
5 4
H = 0 T

s
R
130

Rs (
2

0
10 minutes etch
0

120 30 minutes etch 85 90 95 100 105 110

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 -5


T(K)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350


T(K)

T(K)

FIG. 2. (Color online)The electrical resistivity versus tem-


perature T for unetch and electrical transport as sheet resis- FIG. 3. (Color online) The electrical transport as sheet resis-
tance Rs 10 minutes of plasma etched of the Na2 IrO3 crystals tance Rs versus temperature T for 20 minutes and 30 minutes
at zero magnetic field. of plasma etched Na2 IrO3 crystals. (a) Rs versus T measured
in different applied magnetic field H while cooling from T =
305 K and warming from T = 2 K. The inset shows the cool-
ing and warming data of different applied magnetic field H
localization of the doped carriers due to the disorder in- to highlight the thermal hysteresis which indicating the first-
troduced by the RIE process. A non-monotonic electrical order nature of the phase transition. (b) Rs versus T for 30
transport behaviour is also sometimes observed due to a min exposure time crystal measured in a zero magnetic field
crossover from a larger intrinsic gap at high temperatures H while cooling from T = 305 K and warming from T = 2 K.
to a smaller dopant gap at low temperatures in doped Inset(i) shows the low-temperature data fit to a T2 below T
= 20 K suggesting Fermi-Liquid behavior. Inset(ii) shows the
semiconductors or insulators. A prominent example of
cooling and warming data at zero magnetic field H to high-
this is the correlated insulator NiS2 18 . Figure 3 (a) shows light the thermal hysteresis indicating the first-order nature
Rs (T) data measured for the sample etched for 20 min- of the phase transition.
utes, while cooling and warming in various applied mag-
netic fields H. The sheet resistance increases on cool-
ing below T = 305 K and reaches a maximum around increase in Rs (T) is similar to signatures observed in
250 K. A step-like increase iis observed n the Rs (T) at electrical transport across charge-density-wave (CDW)
T0 = 220 K after which there is a rapid decrease in sheet phase transitions. In the case of a CDW the increase
resistance suggesting metallic behaviour down to 20 K, in Rs (T) indicates a partial loss of the density of states
below which a slight increase in sheet resistance is ob- due to partial gaping of the Fermi surface19 . The transi-
served again. This upturn is stronger than observed for tion temperature at T0 also shows thermal hysteresis of
the 10 min sample and will be consistent with a stronger 10 K between cooling and warming data and indicates
localization due to the increased disorder introduced due a first order phase transition. The transition at T0 is ro-
to etching for longer times. bust in applied magnetic field of up to H = 9 T as can
The Rs (T) behavior close to the transition is high- be seen in the Fig. 3 (a). The magnitude of the increase
lighted in the inset of Fig. 3 (a). At T0 the step-like in Rs (T) increases in applied magnetic fields as seen in
4

the inset of ig. 3 (a). Figure 3 (b) show the Rs (T) versus ing incident small angle x-ray scattering (GISAXS). The
T data for the sample etched for 30 minutes, measured metallic samples are observed to show transport signa-
in zero magnetic field while cooling and heating. The tures consistent with those observed for density wave
sheet resistance increases on cooling below T = 305 K or structural transitions. Specifically, temperature de-
and reaches a maximum around 250 - 270 K, after which pendent sheet resistance Rs (T) for 20 and 30 minutes
it continuously decreases down to T0 = 95 K. At T0 an etched samples show charge density wave like phase tran-
abrupt step-like decrease in Rs (T) by more than an or- sitions with an abrupt change in Rs at T0 = 220 and 95
der of magnitude is observed and there is again a thermal K, respectively as shown in the Fig. 3. Such transport
hysteresis between cooling and warming data indicating anomalies have been observed previously for CDW tran-
the first order nature of the transition. The Rs data sitions in many other materials2123 . The phase transi-
at low temperatures follows a T 2 dependence indicating tion is first order as revealed by a 10 K thermal hystere-
Fermi liquid behaviour. The T 2 fit through the data is sis between cooling and warming measurements. The
shown in the inset in Fig. 3 (b). If the complete crystal most metallic (30 minutes etched) sample follows a T2
thickness ( 0.1 mm) is used in calculating the geometri- Fermi liquid behavior at low temperature. Remarkably
cal factor for converting resistance into resistivity then such spin/charge density waves, electronic dimerization
the coefficient of the T 2 dependence is estimated to be instabilities, and bond order instabilities have been pre-
A = 27 cm/K2 . This value is comparable to values dicted on doping for antiferromagnetic Kitaev and ferro-
obtained for Ce-based heavy Fermion compounds20 . magnetic Heisenberg interaction1214 . However, surface
sensitive probes like electron diffraction or scanning tun-
nelling microscopy (STM) will be required to confirm the
IV. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION coupled electron density and structural modulations ex-
pected below a CDW transition19 .
We have successfully shown that Ar plasma etching a. Acknowledgments. We thank the small angle
can be used to effectively dope the surface of Na2 IrO3 x-ray scattering and RIE plasma etching facility at
crystals and that their electrical conductivity can be var- IISER Mohali. YS acknowledges DST, India for sup-
ied all the way from insulating to metallic by control- port through Ramanujan Grant #SR/S2/RJN-76/2010
ling the etching time. The surface structure of Na2 IrO3 and through DST grant #SB/S2/CMP-001/2013. KM
does not change by plasma etching as revealed by graz- acknowledges UGC-CSIR India for a fellowship.

1 11
G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 S. H. Chun, J.-W. Kim, J. Kim, H. Zheng, C. C. Stoumpos,
(2009). C. D. Malliakas, J. F. Mitchell, K. Mehlawat, Y. Singh, Y.
2
M. K. Crawford, M. A. Subramanian, R. L. Harlow, J. A. Choi, T. Gog, A. Al-Zein, M. Moretti Sala, M. Krisch, J.
Fernandez-Baca, Z. R. Wang, and D. C. Johnston, Phys. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and B. J. Kim, Nat.
Rev. B 49, 9198 (1994). Phys. B 11, 462 (2015).
3 12
B. J. Kim, Hosub Jin, S. J. Moon, J.-Y. Kim, B.-G. Park, S. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. Rev. B 87, 064508 (2013).
13
C. S. Leem, Jaejun Yu, T.W. Noh, C. Kim, S.-J. Oh, J.-H. Y.-Z. You, I. Kimchi, and A. Vishwanath. Phys. Rev. Rev.
Park, V. Durairaj, G. Cao, and E. Rotenberg, Phys. Rev. B 86, 085145 (2012).
14
Lett. 101, 076402 (2008). D. D. Scherer, M. M. Scherer, G. Khaliullin, C. Hon-
4
B. J. Kim, H. Ohsumi, T. Komesu, S. Sakai, T. Morita, H. erkamp, and B. Rosenow, Phys. Rev. B 90, 045135 (2014).
15
Takagi, and T. Arima, Science 323, 1329 (2009). Kavita Mehlawat, and Yogesh Singh, Phys. Rev. B 94,
5
Y. K. Kim, O. Krupin, J. D. Denlinger, A. Bostwick, E. 041109(R) (2016).
16
Rotenberg, Q. Zhao, J. F. Mitchell, J. W. Allen, and B. J. A. Shitade, H. Katsura, J. Kunes, X.-L. Qi, S.-C. Zhang,
Kim, Science 345, 187 (2014). and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 256403 (2009).
6 17
Y. K. Kim, N. H. Sung, J. D. Denlinger, and B. J. Kim, H. S. Kim, C. H. Kim, H. Jeong, H. Jin, and J. Yu, Phys.
Nat. Phys. 12, 37 (2016). Rev. B 87, 165117 (2013).
7 18
Y. J. Yan, M. Q. Ren, H. C. Xu, B. P. Xie, R. Tao, H. Y. X. Yao, J. M. Honig, T. Hogan, C. Kannewurf, and J.
Choi, N. Lee, Y. J. Choi, T. Zhang, and D. L. Feng, Phys. Spalek, Phys. Rev. B 54, 17469 (1996).
19
Rev. X 5, 041018 (2015). G. Gruener, Density Waves in Solids Westview, Boulder,
8
Y. Singh, and P. Gegenwart, Phys. Rev. B 82, 064412 CO, (2000).
20
(2010). G. R. Stewart, Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 755 (1984).
9 21
S. K. Choi, R. Coldea, A. N. Kolmogorov, T. Lancaster, H. D. Yang, P. Klavins, and R. N. Shelton, Phys. Rev. B
I. I. Mazin, S. J. Blundell, P. G. Radaelli, Y. Singh, P. 43, 7688 (1991).
22
Gegenwart, K. R. Choi, S. W. Cheong, P. J. Baker, C. Y. Singh, D. Pal, S. Ramakrishnan, A. M. Awasthi, and
Stock, and J. Taylor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 127204 (2012). S. K. Malik, Phys. Rev. B 71, 045109 (2005).
10 23
Y. Singh, S. Manni, J. Reuther, T. Berlijn, R. Thomale, Y. Singh, R. Nirmala, S. Ramakrishnan, and S. K. Malik,
W. Ku, S. Trebst, and P. Gegenwart. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, Phys. Rev. B 72, 045106 (2005).
127203 (2012).

You might also like