‘avy oySny UeUMNE pure Av] UOREUIDIOT ‘Ae] wORDIT ‘ss0yes0ds07 Jedrorany UO Ae] ‘8I90IGO IAGNY JO Avy] ‘mvy] VanENSIUNUpY WT] MoAsYy Ae] [eTONMIASUOD 03 pasejas syoaiqns yo 2ouaspnsdsun{ puv me yo Apms aanoweiut pue jeuonesidsur ue ysnomp Mee y INOLLATHISAC ASUNOD Tl ausmbararg 3amoy “y Shara 8 eg 0D DOpMOUSSED BAO} “CL son per) esmoD “D maTAsy Ar] [euONAINSTOD BEL 980 “gE p09 asmon “¥ NOLLVOMMILNAGI 3SYN09 I Toc AV ‘10;s0m19g AHIATY AVT TVNOLLOA.LILSNOD ay saqeyAgLo OLN@INUVS ‘A FNAW" ALLY Gpnoe, jo suey 2hq paredarg canqedg paypene 295 “| (-o1a ‘eraafosd ‘euodas uowpas ‘suopeypes ‘suopeUTExs) spoTRIW suawesossy Suquser] popusiny ‘dn uaqR 9q 03 poped/2eq ‘sdoL :AOVUAAOD ASUNOD ‘AT \ ; “A PONAC UF UOpEUTETEKe seq otp apes OF Apeas aq ApuepyuOD ‘€ “RET TORT Jo Lsovery pur Aqdosopyd op puesesopuy, 7 *BOHNINSUOD WOPT2s,1 9861 >t) eee WORNIRSUOD ¢/6T ‘BONMINSUOD CpET ‘BONNIN: *aonns! m1 a 1a ntUA&P SCHOOL OF LAW AND GOVERNANCE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REVIEW ‘SY 2017-2018 SYLLABUS ‘The President and Proclamation of Martial Law 1. Article VII, Sec. 18, 1987 Constitution 2 1935 Constitution, 1973 Constitution 3. Lagman vs. Medialdea, et. al., July 4, 2017 General Principles ‘The 1987 Constitution Francisco vs. House of Representatives, G.R. No. 160261, November 10, 2003 CHREA vs. CHR, G.R. No. 155336, November 25, 2004; July 21, 2006 Civil Liberties Union vs. Executive Secretary, 194SCRA 317 ‘Manila Prince Hotel vs. GSIS, 267 SCRA 408 ». ‘Sanidad vs. COMELEC, 73 SCRA 333 10. PBA vs. COMELEC, 140 SCRA 455 11. Lawyers League vs. Aquino, G.R. No. 73748, May 22, 1986 12, Defensor-Santiago vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 127325, March 19, 1997 13, Salonga ve. Pato, 134 SCRA 438 14, Tadiada vs. Angara, 272 SCRA 18 15, Sanlakas vs. Executive Secretary, G-R. No. 159085, February 3, 2004 16. David, et.al. vs. Pres. Gloria Macapagal-Acroyo, et. al, G.R. No. 171396 17. Senate vs. Sec. Enmita, G.R. No. 169777, April 20, 2006 18. Bayan va. Sec. Ermita, G.R. No. 169881, Apsil 25, 2006 19. Roque vs. COMELEG, G.R. No. 188456, September 10, 2009 ‘The Philippine As A State 1, Collector of Intemal Revenue vs. Campos Rueda, 42 SCRA 23 2 Romualdez-Yap vs. Civil Service Commission, 225 SCRA 285 3. Shipside, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G-R. No. 143377, February 20, 2001 4, Cabanas vs, Pilapil, 58 SCRA 94 5. Laurel vs. Misa, 77 Phil. 856 6 Peralta vs. Disector of Prisons, 75 Phil. 285 7. Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center vs. NLRC, 206 SCRA 283 & — Minucher vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 142396, February 11, 2003 9. — Callado ve. IRI, 244 SCRA 210 10. SSS va. Coust of Appeals, 120 SCRA 707 11. Bureau of Printing vs. Bureau of Printing Employees Association, 1 SCRA 340 12, Department of Agsicultee vs. NLRC, 227 SCRA 693 13. Sanders vs. Veridiano, 162 SCRA 88lic vs. Sandoval, 220 SCRA 124 US. vs. Ruiz, 136 SCRA 487 RCBC vs. De Castro, 168 SCRA 49 Province of North Cotabato vs. GRP Peace Panel on Ancestral Domain, et. al, GR. No. 183591, October 14, 2008 Nicolas vs. Romulo, et. al, G.R. No. 175888, February 11, 2009 National Housing Authosity vs. Roxas, 773 SCRA 358 (2015) Fundamental Powers of the State 10. 1 12 13. 14, 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20, 21. 2. 2B. Lambino vs. COMELEG, GR. No. 174153, October 25, 2006 Haig vs. Agee, 453 US. 280 (1981) NY Times vs. US. (Pentagon Papers) 403 U.S. 713 (1971) PPI vs. COMELEC, 244 SCRA 272 Tio vs. Videogram Regulatory Board, 151 SCRA 208 (Ortigas vs. Court of Appeals, GR. No. 126102, December 4, 2000 Chavez vs. Romulo, 431 SCRA 534 Metro Manila Development Authority vs. Bel-Air Village Association, GR. No. 135962, Masch 27, 2000 Professional Regulations Commission vs. De Guzman, G.R. No. 144681, June 21, 2004 JMM Promotion and Management, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, 260 SCRA 319 Dela Gruz vs. Paras, 123 SCRA 569 Republic vs. PLDT, 26 SCRA 620 Jesus is Lord Christian School Foundation vs. Municipality of Pasig, G.R. No. 152230, ‘Augest 9, 2005 Bardillon vs. Barangay Masili of Calamba, Laguna, G.R. No. 146886, April 30, 2003 Republic vs. Castelvi, 58 SCRA 336 Filstream International, Inc. vs. Coust of Appeals, 284 SCRA 716 Lageao vs. Judge Labra, G.R. No. 155746, October 13, 2004 Ealaban vs, De Onorio, G.R. No. 146062, June 28, 2001 Republic (DAR) vs. Court of Appeals, 263 SCRA 758 Land Bank vs. Coutt of Appeals, 249 SCRA 149 ‘National Power Corporation vs. Angas, 208 SCRA 149 ‘Mactan Cebu Intemational Aispost vs. Marcos, 261 SCRA 667 ‘Republic vs. Mupas, 769 SCRA 384 (2015) Principles and State Policies 1 iz 3 4 5. 6 7. 8 9. 10. Villavicencio va. Luchan, 39 Phil. 778 ‘Tuason vs. Register of Deeds of Caloocan City, 157 SCRA 613 ‘Angara vs. Electoral Commission, 63 Phil. 139 ‘Marcos vs. Manglapus, 178 SCRA 760 Casibang vs. Aquino, 92 SCRA 642 Garcia vs. Executive Secretary, 211 SCRA 219 ‘Araneta vs. Dinglasan, 84 Phil. 368 ‘Chiongbian vs. Orbos, 245 SCRA 253 Kuroda vs. Jalandoni, 42 O.G. 4282 Secretary of Justice vs. Lantion, G.R. No. 139465, January 18, 2000cvs 12. 13. 14, 15. 16. 7 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24, ‘Alih vs. Castro, 151 SCRA 279 Lim vs. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 151445, Apsil 11, 2002 Calalang vs. Williams, 70 Phil. 726 Postigo vs. PISI, G.R. No. 155146, January 24, 2006 PT&T vs. NLRC, GR. No. 118978, May 23, 1997 Oposa vs. Factoran, 224 SCRA 792 Villar vs. TIP, 135 SCRA 706 Soriao vs. Pineda, CA-G.R. SP No. 31546, August 10, 1994 Philippine Association of Service Exporters vs. Drilon, 163 SCRA 386 Association of Philippine Coconut Desiccators vs. PHILCOA, G.R. No. 110526, February 10, 1998 Basco vs. PAGCOR, 197 SCRA 52 Pamatong vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 161872, Apsil 13, 2004 Legaspi vs. Civil Service Commission, 150 SCRA 530 Aquino-Sarmiento vs. Morato, 203 SCRA 515 Bill of Rights eee BSBARGESREBS ROA x BESSBSRREBBE PBM Employees Organization vs. Philippine Blooming Mills, 51 SCRA 189 ‘Simon vs. Commission on Human Rights, G-R. No. 100150, January 5, 1994 Ermita Malate Hotel & Motel Operators Association vs. City of Manila, 20 SCRA 849 Biraogo vs. The Philippine Truth Commission; Lagman vs. Ochoa, et. al., GR. Nos. 192935 and 193036, December 7, 2010 White Light Corporation, et.al. vs. City of Manila, G.R. No. 122846, January 20, 2009 Silahis Intemational Hotel Inc. vs. Soluta, G.R. No. 163087, February 20, 2006 Rubi ve. Provincial Board of Mindoro, 39 Phil. 660 Libanan vs. Sandiganbayan, 233 SCRA 163 Orquiola vs. Tandang Sora Development Corporation, 386 SCRA 301 (2002) Diloso ve. Sandiganbayan, 173 SCRA 409 Javier vs. COMELEC, 144 SCRA 194 ‘Galman vs. Sandiganbayan, 144 SCRA 43 People vs. Castillo, 289 SCRA 213 ‘Tejano vs. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 159190, June 30, 2005 Tatad vs. Sandiganbayan, 159 SCRA 70 Caras vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 129900, October 2, 2001 ‘Masiveles Shipyard vs. Court of Appeals, G:R. No. 144134, November 11, 2003 ‘Zaldivar vs. Sandiganbayan, 166 SCRA 316 Villarvel vs. Femando, G.R. No. 136726, September 24, 2008 Losbes vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 139884, February 15, 2001 ‘Tropical Homes vs. NHA, 152 SCRA 540 Sajot vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 107921, March 11, 1999 Rogue vs. Ombudsman, G-R. No. 129978, May 12, 1999 ‘Ang Tibay vs. CHR, 69 Phil. 635, Dumlao vs. COMELEC, 95 SCRA 392 Conference of Maritime Manning Agencies vs. POEA, 243 SCRA 666 People vs. Jalosjos, G.R. No. 132875-76, February 3, 2000 ‘Stonehill vs. Diokno, 20 SCRA 383 Manlavi vs. Gacott, 244 SCRA 50 Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 255 SCRA 438 Nolasco vs. Patio, 139 SCRA 152 Uni vs. Ramos, 187 SCRA 311SREB BES PSSSSARRRSPeSSS Zulueta vs. Coust of Appeals, 253 SCRA 699 Moquiling vs. PTSI, GR. No. 143384, February 4, 2005 Baguio Midland Cousier vs. Court of Appeals, GR. No. 107566, November 25, 2004 US. ve. Bustos, 37 Phil. 731 AM. No. 10-11-5-SC, Re: Petition for Radio and Television Coverage of Multiple Murder Case against Gov. Ampatuan, et.al, June 14, 2011 Baldoza vs. Dimaano, 71 SCRA 14 Social Security Employees Association vs. Court of Appeals, 175 SCRA 686 PNB vs. Remigio, G.R. No. 78508, March 21, 1994 People vs. Judge Ayson, 175 SCRA 216 People vs. Bravo, G.R. No. 135562, November 22, 1999 Navallo vs. Sandiganbayan, 234 SCRA 175 Gamboa vs. Cruz, 162 SCRA 642 People vs. Bandula, 232 SCRA 565 ‘Aberca vs. Ver, 160 SCRA 590 People vs. San Diego, 26 SCRA 522 Narciso vs. Cruz, 328 SCRA 505 Chavez vs. Gonzales and NTC, G.R. No. 168338, February 15, 2008 Government of Hong Kong vs. Olalia, G.R. No. 153875, Apal 19, 2007 Convoy Marketing Corporation vs. Albia, 772 SCRA 162 (2015) 7107 Islands Publishing, Inc. vs. The House Printers Corporation, 772 SCRA 392 2015) Homar vs. People, 768 SCRA 584 (2015) Ogayon vs. People. 768 SCRA 670 (2015) People vs. Calantiao, 727 SCRA 20 (2014) etl AAPA NS Mercado vs. Manzano, 307 SCRA 630 Matia Janette Tecaon vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 161434, March 3, 2004 Co vs. HRET, 199 SCRA 692 Faivaldo vs. COMELEC, 257 SCRA 727 Bengzon III vs. HRET, G.R. No. 142840, May 7, 2001 Cordora vs. COMELEC and Tambunting, GR. No. 176947, February 19, 2009 De Guzman vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 180048, June 19, 2009 ‘The Legislative Department Pee PARED i 12, Tobias vs. Abalos, 239 SCRA 106 ‘Marcos vs. COMELEC, 248 SCRA 300 BANAT vs. COMELEG, G.R. No. 179271, Apsil 21, 2009 ‘Ang Bagong Bayani vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 147589, June 26, 2001 ‘Ligot vs. Mathay, 56 SCRA 823 ‘Jimenez vs. Cabangbang, 17 SCRA 876 ‘Sampayan vs. Daza, 213 SCRA 807 ‘Sarmiento vs. Mison, 156 SCRA 549 Philippine Judges Association vs. Prado, 227 SCRA 703 COMELEC vs. Judge Quijano Padilla, et. al, G.R. No. 151992, September 18, 2002 Bengzon vs. Senate Blue Ribbon Committee, 203 SCRA 767 Lico vs. COMELEG, 771 SCRA 596 (2015)‘The Executive Department 1. Makalintal vs. COMELEC, G.R No. 157013, July 10, 2003 2 Baillantes vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 163193, June 15, 2004 3. Estrada vs. Desiesto, G.R. No. 146710-15, March 2, 2001 4. — Givil Liberties Union vs. Executive Secretary, 194 SCRA 317 5. Estrada vs. GMA, G.R. No. 146738, March 2, 2001 6 — Marcos vs. Manglapus, 177 SCRA 668 7. Matibag vs. Benipayo, G.R. No. 149036, Apsil 2, 2002 & Pimentel vs. Emnita, G.R. No. 164978, October 13, 2005 9. Integrated Bar of the Philippines vs. Zamora, G.R. No. 141284, August 5, 2000 10. People vs. Patriarca, G.R. No. 135457, September 29, 2000 re 12, Ned vs. Senate Committee, G:R. No. 180643, March 25, 2008 SM Land, Inc. vs. BCDA, 769 SCRA 310 (2015) Judicial Department araeye 1 a 9. 10. pose eres ae De Leon vs. Coust of Appeals, G.R. No. 127182, December 5, 2001 People vs. Gutierrez, 39 SCRA 173 In Re: Atty. Marcial dillon, A.C. No. 1928, August 3, 1978 Dizon vs. Judge Lopez, AM No. RT}-96-1338, September 5, 1997 ‘Judge Cacibes vs. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 132177, July 17, 2001 Re: Derogatory News Item Charging Court of Appeals Justice Demettio Demetria with Intecference oo Behalf of a Suspected Drug Queen, AM No. 00-7-09 CA, March 27, 2001 Santiago vs. Tulfo, 773 SCRA 558 (2015) Basroso ve. Omelio, 772 SCRA 437 (2015) ‘Hemandez vs. Gella, 725 SCRA 330 (2014) ‘Alano vs. Sabi, 727 SCRA 171 (2014) Commissi CSC vs. Department of Budget, G.R. No. 158791, July 22, 2005 CHREA vs. CHR, G.R. No. 155336, November 25, 2004; July 21, 2006 Gaminde vs. Commission on Audit, G.R. No. 140335, December 13, 2000 Estrella vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 160465, May 27, 2004 “Alvacez vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 142527, March 2, 2001 General vs. Roco, G.R. No. 143366 & 143524, January 29, 2001 ULP. vs. Civil Service Commission, G.R. No. 132860, April 13, 2001 Del Castillo vs. CSC, GR. No. 112513, August 21, 1997 PNB vs. Gascia, G.R. No. 141246, September 9, 2002 Bantay Republic Act vs. COMELEC, G.R. No, 177271, May 4, 2007 Santos ve. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 139792, November 22, 2000 Cayetano vs. Monsod, G.R. No. 100113, September 3, 1991 Penesa vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 181613, September 11, 200%; G.R. No. 181613, ‘November 25, 2009 Quinto vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 189698, February 22, 2010 Mendoza vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 191084, March 25, 2010 Liberal Party vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 19171, May 6, 2010 Lonzanida vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 135150, July 28, 1999 LADLAD vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 190582, Apsil 8, 2010 Caballero vs. COMELEG, 771 SCRA 213 (2015)6 20. Legaspi vs. COMELEG, 768 SCRA 484 (2015) a. Mary Grace Natividad S. Poe-Llamanzares v. COMELEC, GR. Nos. 221697 & 221698-700, March 8, 2016 Accountability of Public Officers YEN AAA SN Jarque vs. Desierto, 250 SCRA 11 Francisco vs. House of Representatives, G.R. No. 160261, November 10, 2003 Gutierrez vs. House of Representatives Committee on Justice, G.R. No. 193459, February 15, 2011 Binay vs. Sandigaabayan, G.R. No. 120281-83, October 2, 1999 Diaz vs. Sandiganbayan, 219 SCRA 675 Buenaseda vs. Flavier, 226 SCRA 645 Ledesma vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 161629, July 29, 2005 10. PDIC vs, Casimiro, 769 SCRA 110 (2015) National Economy and Patrimony PRAHA Pe Lee Hong Kok vs. David, 48 SCRA 372 Ditector of Lands vs, Intermediate Appellate Court, 219 SCRA 339 ‘Telecommunications and Broadcast Attomeys of the Philippines vs. COMELEC, 289 SCRA 337 Republic vs. Court of Appeals, 148 SCRA 480 Republic vs. Imperial, G.R. No. 130906, February 11, 1999 ‘Ong Ching Po vs. Court of Appeals, 239 SCRA 341 Baguio vs. Republic, G.R. No. 119682, January 21, 1999 Gamboa vs. Teves, G-R. No. 176579, October 9, 2012 Roy vs. Herbosa, G.R. No. 207246, November 22, 2016 10. Republic vs. Raneses, 725 SCRA 424 2014) Social Justice and Human Rights eae Astudillo vs. Board of Directors, PHHC, 73 SCRA 15 ‘SSS Employees vs. CA, 175 SCRA 686 vv. Leachon, G-R. No. 108725, September 25, 1998 PT&T vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 118978, May 23, 1997 EPZA vs. CHR, 208 SCRA 125 Lingan vs. Calubaquib, 727 SCRA 341 (2014) Education, Science & Technology, Arts, Culture and Sports seyee ope ‘Tablasin vs. Gutierrez, 154 SCRA 730 Midam Collge Foundation ve Cour of Appel, GR. No. 127930, November 15, Camacho vt. Cons, GR. No. 134372, Agost 22,2002 Capitol Medical Ceater vs. Court of Appeals, 178 SCRA 493 ‘Tan vs. Court of Appeals, 199 SCRA 212 UP. Board of Regents vs. William, G.R. No. 134625, August 31, 1999 Cagayan Capitol Valley vs. NLRC, 189 SCRA 658ARV ARP » Readings ‘Towards More Justice and More Liberty (Understanding Wsit of Amparo and Wait of Habeas Data), Sarmiento Intemational Criminal Court (Rome Statute) Grow in Grace and Govern in Wisdom (Readings in Legal Philosophy), Sarmiento RA No. 9369 RA. No. 9522 (Baselines Law) ‘The Teial of Jose Rizal: Was Due Process Observed? We, The Sovereign Filipino People (A Book of Seven Filipino Constitutions), ‘Sarmiento Outline Reviewer in POLITICAL LAW, Nachura XVII. Practicum epee ‘An Aftemoon Session with a Supreme Court Justice, Senator and Cabinet Secretary Our Favorite Lawyer-Presidenta/Prime Ministers In World’s Democracies Field Trip (Mabini Shsine; Taal, Batangas; San Narciso, Zambales; Malacanang Museum; Congress of the Philippines)