Association for the Protection of Victims European Court of Human Rights

of Croatian Judiciary Veronica Vere Council of Europe

Zapoljska 6 67075 Strasbourg
10000 Zagreb / Croatia France

Strasbourg, September 7, 2017

Predmet: Zahtjev za hitnom pomoi nadlenih institucija EU glede neizdrive korupcije u hrvatskom pravosuu
Subject: Request for urgent help of relevant EU institutions regarding unsustainable corruption in the Croatian
judiciary

Dear Sirs,
we have decided to address you because of extremely difficult situation in the Croatian judiciary, which you surely
already know about, because it was the subject of controversy during the process of Croatian accession to the EU (Chapter 23).
Although the EU has made a political decision that, despite the bad state of the Croatian judiciary, which has not improved, Croatia
would be received in the membership of the EU, this decision proved to be completely wrong literally from the first day (during the
"Lex Perkovic" situation), so Viviane Reding then publicly admitted that "Croatia abused trust" 1, announcing EU sanctions and
monitoring of the Croatian judiciary.
However, there were neither sanctions nor monitoring, and the EU bodies consciously let their citizens from the territory
of Croatia to be destroyed by local Croatian judiciary!
That was confirmed by the most recent research by GRECO, an organization for Combating Corruption set up by the
Council of Europe, which was published a few months ago. 2
This research has shown that the mistrust of Croatian citizens towards the judiciary has considerably increased since
Croatian joining the EU, and now 53% of citizens and even 64% of persons working in the judiciary believe that Croatian judges
are corrupt, and such a situation has also been confirmed by long scientific research of other independent sources. 3
The situation is so bad that, for example, seven judiciary officials have been publicly accused of crime in the book
Judiciary and Police Mafia based on irrefutable evidence published and available to everyone on the Internet, but they simply
ignore those public statements, and they are even filing no lawsuits for defamation, because they know that at the court trial that
would be interesting to the media, all those accusations would be proved correct, and the State Attorney's Office knows all this,
but does not do anything.4
The result of such state of radical corruption for which by failing to act the EU is responsible, are numerous personal
and family tragedies, suicides and displacement of people from Croatia, which has taken apocalyptical proportions. These people,
after leaving Croatia, explain: "We have not just gone away because there is no job, but also because of injustice" - as the title of
the longest article on this subject (published on 6 pages, in the biggest Croatian daily newspaper, Veernji list, no. 18646, 19. 12.
2015., p. 18-23) says.
Therefore, we, members of the Association for the Protection of Victims of Croatian Judiciary Veronica Vere, have
decided to ask you for urgent assistance in all available ways concerning unsustainable corruption in the Croatian judiciary and
also in the form of supervision of the work of our judiciary 5, which gave excellent results in Romania, where it has become the
basis of the country's prosperity. We are asking you this as citizens of the EU, and if necessary, we are begging you, because the
situation in which we find ourselves is unsustainable and threatens to destroy our lives or even send us to death.

These are our stories:

In 1994, DUBRAVKA MILOSAVLJEVI exchanged her house in Banja Luka for a house in Sv. Filip i Jakov, but she
could not enter it, because there were refugees living in it. Then she sold the house to Marin Kneevi, but he never gave her any
money for the house. A witness of the alleged payment for the house, Petar Sui, later gave his statement to the public notary,
in which he admitted that he had lied in the court that he saw that Marin Kneevi gave money to Dubravka Milosavljevi for her

1 Available at: http://www.dw.com/hr/reding-hrvatska-je-zloupotrijebila-povjerenje/a-17096049

2 Available at: http://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/veliko-istrazivanje-o-pravosudnom-sustavu-vise-od-polovice-gradana-ne-vjeruje-u-posteno-sudenje-petina-zaposlenih-u-pravosudu-
iskusila-korupciju/5715703/
3 See: https://www.scribd.com/document/357895679/Kriminal-i-korupcija-na-hrvatskim-sudovima-su-sustavni-i-odlu%C4%8Duju-u-vi%C5%A1e-od-64-postupaka

4 Vidjeti: https://www.scribd.com/document/334948743/Ministarstvo-pravosu%C4%91a-svjesno-%C5%A1titi-pravosudnu-mafiju

5 On our individual requests we have not received any answer. See: https://www.scribd.com/doc/280543266/Official-letter-to-Mrs-Vera-Jourova-sent-on-Aug-31-2015 ;

https://www.scribd.com/doc/281592120/Official-letter-to-Mrs-Jourova-Septebmer-18-2015
house. Kneevi is still the owner of the house. It is also a case of legal discrimination on national basis, because Dubravka
Milosavljevis father was a Serb.6

In a series of misconceptions and frauds BRANKA PERI was deprived of her house and has her case is now at the
European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. The witnesses confirmed that the judges in Bjelovar received money to judge in
favour of Branka`s court opponent, prof. Nikola Vukovi. Branka Peri reported the corrupt judges to the State Attorney's Office,
and they responded with an initiative to declare Branka Peri insane, and thus disable her in the struggle for her legal rights.

In 1992, DRAGO RASPUDI bought an apartment in Zagreb from the company "Parket" in which he worked. Raspudi
owns all possible legal documentation about the allocation of the apartment and its purchase: the company's decision on the
allocation of the apartment, the signed contract, the ownership card, the ID card at that address. But the right to the apartment is
also claimed in court by Boica Nuinovi, the wife of university professor Mustafa Nuinovi, claiming that her mother Margita
Kekelj bought that apartment, although the first payment was made for that purpose two weeks after Margita Kekelj's death. The
company "Parket" returned the paid money the same day, and there is valid documentation confirming that. All the witnesses and
all the documents indicate that Drago Raspudi legally bought the apartment and that he is the owner. However, the Zagreb Court
of first instance ruled in favor of M. Nuinovi's wife on the basis of Nuinovi's testimony and the enclosed forged documents
with a mirrored seal(!). The court expert confirmed that the documents were forgeries. The Zagreb County Court issued a verdict
in favor of Nuinovi's wife on Sunday(!) even though she did not pay for the apartment, and is asking that Raspudi with his
family goes on the street, and hands over his apartment to Nuinovis who are not the owners and who have arrogantly sued
Raspudi for trespassing of their property. After 23 years, the Croatian Supreme Court returned the case to a retrial. Even though
Raspudi has the ownership card, the agony that started in 1992 continues! 7

In 2009, SONJA TAKI received an unlawful dismissal from the well-known tycoon eljko Orekovi "Macola", one
of the 200 richest Croats, and her lawsuit, after a series of irrational court delays at the Municipal Court in Gospi, and after eight
years of trial has not been solved, although such a lawsuit the labor dispute should according to law be resolved within 3
years. The Supreme Court recently returned the case to a retrial in Gospi. 8

In 2009 ANTE VRANKOVI was deprived of his fundamental human and constitutional right to life by taking away of
the means by which Vrankovi was earning for his living. This was done by the judge of the Municipal Court in Stari Grad (island
of Hvar) Jadranka Jelii, on the request of Vrankovi`s 7 years older biological sister, a rich lawyer Dijana Zorii. All these facts
were publicly confirmed as correct in the leading newspapers by the Croatian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, which
expressed support to Vrankovi during his hunger strike. In 2012 Vrankovi reported unethical conduct of his biological sister (in
the meantime it had been proved by final court verdicts that she was responsible for the death of their mother, and similarly for
the death of their father), to the Croatian Bar Association (CBA), whose disciplinary persecutor, Predrag Laban, requested the
bribe from Vrankovi to handle that disciplinary report. Vrankovi reported this to USKOK (Croatian State Prosecutor's Office for
the Suppression of Organized Crime and Corruption), who did not reject his criminal report, but did not do anything about it. At
the request of the Ministry of Justice, the State Attorney General, Dinko Cvitan, stated that USKOK did not act on Vrankovi's
report because he did not submit a requested addition, although Vrankovi did that on the same day, and that addition was
received in USKOK on January 24, 2013 (and together with the postal Advice of its delivery is available on the Internet). On July
27, 2016, Vrankovi reported the Cvitan`s false report to the Ministry of Justice 9 from which he received the "reply" from Marinka
Jeli, in which neither Cvitan nor Vrankovi's report was mentioned(!). Since four courts, police, human rights organizations, the
Ministry of Finance, the Ombudsman and the President of the Republic of Croatia proved him right, Vrankovi decided that after
his return from Strasbourg he would go on a hunger strike again, demanding from CBA and the Ministry of Justice to start to work
by law.10

6 Well known Jutarnji list: http://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/crna-kronika/dignut-cu-i-sebe-i-kucu-u-zrak-zbog-delozacije-ocajna-majka-zrtva-ucjene-i-prevare-u-filip-jakovu/1073672/

7 See: http://www.maxportal.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/drago-raspudic-gubi-stan-sud-je-odluku-donio-nedjeljom-temeljem-krivotvorenih-dokumenata/
8 The story was reported about by Novi list and 24 sata: https://www.scribd.com/document/353461528/Sonja-%C5%A0taki%C4%87

9 See report at: https://www.scribd.com/document/319899381/Disciplinska-odgovornost-Dinka-Cvitana-za-neistinito-izvije%C5%A1%C4%87e-DORH-a-od-28-lipnja-2016

10 See detailed information at: https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suradnik:Ante_Vrankovi%C4%87 ; https://www.scribd.com/document/355945574/%C5%A0TRAJK-GLA%C4%90U-Otvoreno-pismo-

HOK-u-8-8-2017 ; http://www.hazud.hr/djelatnici-ministarstva-pravosuda-se-drsko-javno-izruguju-gradanima-disciplinskoj-prijavi-ministarstvu-pravosuda-marinke-jelic-odlucuje-marinka-jelic/
 IN CROATIAN

Potovani,
obraamo Vam se povodom izuzetno teke situacije u hrvatskome pravosuu, koja Vam je sigurno
poznata, jer je bila predmetom prijepora tijekom procesa ulaska Hrvatske u EU (poznato Poglavlje 23). Iako je
EU donijela politiku odluku da usprkos loem stanju u pravosuu, koje se nije poboljalo, Hrvatska bude
primljena u lanstvo EU, ta se odluka doslovno od prvoga dana (tijekom situacije oko Lex Perkovi) pokazala
potpuno pogrjenom, pa je tako i sama Viviane Reding tada javno priznala da je Hrvatska zloupotrijebila
povjerenje11, najavljujui i sankcije, te monitoring nad hrvatskim pravosuem.
Meutim, niti sankcija, niti monitoringa nije bilo, te su tijela EU svjesno pustila svoje graane s podruja
Hrvatske na unitenje lokalnom hrvatskome pravosuu!
Da je tome tako, pokazuje i najnovije istraivanje GRECO-a, organizacije ustanovljene od Vijea Europe
za borbu protiv korupcije, objavljeno pred par mjeseci.12
To istraivanje je pokazalo da je nepovjerenje hrvatskih graana prema pravosuu znatno poraslo od kada
je Hrvatska lanica EU, te sada ak 53 % graana, i ak 64% djelatnika u pravosuu smatra da su hrvatsku suci
korumpirani, a takvo su stanje temeljem desetogodinjih egzaktnih istraivanja potvrdili i drugi nezavisni izori. 13
Stanje je toliko loe da se primjerice dogaa da 7 pravosudnih djelatnika u knjizi Pravosudna mafija
bude poimence javno prozvano za kriminal, temeljem neoborivih dokaza objavljenih te svima dostupnih i na
Internetu, no oni se naprosto oglue, ne podiui ak ni tube za klevetu, jer znaju da bi se na suenju koje bi
medijima bilo zanimljivo bilo dokazalo da su optube tone, a Dravno odvjetnitvo sve to zna ali ne poduzima
nita.14
Rezultat takvog stanja radikalne korupcije za koje je svojim nepostupanjem odgovorna EU su brojne
osobne i obiteljske tragedije, samoubojstva i iseljavanje ljudi iz Hrvatske, koje je poprimilo apokaliptine
razmjere. Ti ljudi nakon svojeg odlaska objanjavaju: Ne odlazi se samo zato to nema posla, boli i nepravda
kako glasi naslov najveeg do sada lanka na tu temu, objavljenog na ak 6 strana, u najtiranijoj hrvatskoj
novini, Veernjem listu, broj 18646, 19. 12. 2015., str. 18-23.
Stoga smo mi, lanovi Udruge za zatitu rtava hrvatskoga pravosua Veronika Vere odluili zamoliti Vas
i zatraiti od Vas hitnu pomo glede korupcije u hrvatskom pravosuu, na sve raspoloive naine pa i u formi
uvoenja nadzora nad radom naeg pravosua 15, koji je u Rumunjskoj dao odline rezultate i postao temeljem
prosperiteta te zemlje. Ovo Vas kao graani EU molimo, te ako je nuno i preklinjemo, jer je situacija u kojoj se
nalazimo neizdriva, i prijeti unititi nae ivote ili nas ak otjerati u smrt.
Evo naih pria:
DUBRAVKA MILOSAVLJEVI je 1994. zamijenila svoju kuu u Banja Luci za kuu u Sv. Filipu i Jakovu,
ali u nju nije mogla ui, jer su u njoj ivjeli prognanici. Tada je kuu prodala Marinu Kneeviu, ali joj on za kuu
nikada nije dao nikakav novac. Svjedok navodnog plaanja kue Petar Sui je kasnije kod javnog biljenika
ovjerio izjavu da je na sudu lagao da je vidio kako je Kneevi Dubravki Milosavljevi platio kuu. Kneevi je i
dalje vlasnik kue. Radi se o pravnoj diskriminaciji i na nacionalnoj osnovi, jer je otac D. Milosavljevi bio Srbin. 16
BRANKA PERI je nizom zabluda i prijevara na nezakonit nain ostala bez kue te je njezin predmet
sada na sudu u Strasbourgu. Svjedoci su potvrdili da su bjelovarski suci dobili novac kako bi sudili u korist njezine
protustranke, prof. Nikole Vukovia. Branka Peri je korumpirane suce prijavila Dravnom odvjetnitvu, na to
je iz DORH-a odgovoreno inicijativom da ju se proglasi ludom, i tako ju se onemogui u borbi za njezina prava.

11 Dostupno na: http://www.dw.com/hr/reding-hrvatska-je-zloupotrijebila-povjerenje/a-17096049

12 Dostupno na: http://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/veliko-istrazivanje-o-pravosudnom-sustavu-vise-od-polovice-gradana-ne-vjeruje-u-posteno-sudenje-petina-zaposlenih-u-pravosudu-
iskusila-korupciju/5715703/
13 Vidjeti: https://www.scribd.com/document/357895679/Kriminal-i-korupcija-na-hrvatskim-sudovima-su-sustavni-i-odlu%C4%8Duju-u-vi%C5%A1e-od-64-postupaka

14 Vidjeti: https://www.scribd.com/document/334948743/Ministarstvo-pravosu%C4%91a-svjesno-%C5%A1titi-pravosudnu-mafiju

15 Na nae osobne apele u tom smjeru nismo nikad dobili adekvatan odgovor. Vidjeti: https://www.scribd.com/doc/280543266/Official-letter-to-Mrs-Vera-Jourova-sent-on-Aug-31-2015 ;

https://www.scribd.com/doc/281592120/Official-letter-to-Mrs-Jourova-Septebmer-18-2015
16 Renomirani Jutarnji list: http://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/crna-kronika/dignut-cu-i-sebe-i-kucu-u-zrak-zbog-delozacije-ocajna-majka-zrtva-ucjene-i-prevare-u-filip-jakovu/1073672/
 DRAGO RASPUDI je 1992. otkupio stan u Zagrebu od tvrtke Parket u kojoj je radio. O dodjeli stana i
njegovom otkupu Raspudi ima svu dokumentaciju koju je mogue imati: odluku tvrtke o dodjeli stana, potpisani
ugovor, vlasniki list, osobnu iskaznicu na tu adresu. No, pravo na stan na sudu potrauje i supruga sveuilinog
profesora Mustafe Nuinovia, Boica, tvrdei da je njezina majka Margita Kekelj otkupila taj stan, iako su prve
uplatnice u tu svrhu uplaene 2 tjedana nakon smrti M. Kekelj. Tvrtka Parket je isti dan vratila uplaeni novac,
o emu postoji dokumentacija. Svi svjedoci i svi dokumenti govore da je Drago Raspudi legalno kupio stan i da
je njegov vlasnik. Prvostupanjski sud u Zagrebu meutim presuuje u korist supruge M. Nuinovia, i to temeljem
Nuinovievog iskaza i naoigled krivotvorenih dokumenata sa zrcalno okrenutim peatom(!). Sudski vjetak je
potvrdio da su dokumenti krivotvorine. upanijski sud u Zagrebu u nedjelju(!) donosi presudu u korist
Nuinovieve supruge, iako ona nije platila stan, te trai da Raspudi s obitelji iseli na ulicu i preda stan
Nuinovievima koji nisu vlasnici, a koji su Raspudia drsko tuili za ometanje posjeda. Vrhovni sud nakon 23
godine vraa predmet na ponovno suenje. Iako Raspudi ima vlasniki list, agonija zapoeta 1992. se nastavlja!17
SONJA TAKI je 2009. dobila nezakonit otkaz od poznatog tajkuna eljka Orekovia Macole, jednog
od 200 najbogatijih Hrvata, i njezina tuba, radi niza iracionalnih sudskih odugovlaenja na Opinskom sudu u
Gospiu, niti nakon 8 godina nije rijeena, iako je po zakonu takav predmet - radni spor - trebao biti rijeen
unutar 3 godine. Vrhovni sud je nedavno vratio predmet na ponovno suenje u Gospi. 18
ANTI VRANKOVIU je 2009. sutkinja Opinskog suda u Starom Gradu (o. Hvar) Jadranka Jelii, na
traenje njegove bioloke sestre, odvjetnice Dijane Zorii, osporila temeljno ljudsko i ustavno pravo na ivot, na
nain oduzimanja sredstava kojima je Vrankovi skrbio za ivot. Tu je injenicu u novinama potvrdio i HHO, koji
je Vrankoviu izrazio podrku tijekom trajka glau. Vrankovi je 2012. postupanje svoje biol. sestre (za koju je u
meuvremenu pravomonim sudskim presudama dokazano da je odgovorna za smrt njihove majke, a slino i u sluaju oca oca) prijavio Hrvatskoj
odvjetnikoj komori, iji ga je disciplinski tuitelj Predrag Laban za rjeavanje prijave zatraio mito. Vrankovi je
to prijavio USKOK-u, koji nije odbacio prijavu, ali po njoj nije nita nije poduzimao. Na upit iz Ministarstva
pravosua o tome, glavni dravni odvjetnik Dinko Cvitan je naveo da USKOK ne postupa po Vrankovievoj prijavi
zato jer on nije poslao njezinu dopunu, iako je Vrankovi to uinio isti dan, i ona je primljena u USKOK-u 24. 1.
2013., te je zajedno s povratnicom koja to dokazuje, dostupna na Internetu. Vrankovi je 27. 7. 2016. prijavio
Cvitanovo lano izvijee Ministarstvu pravosua19 iz kojeg je nakon godinu dana dobio odgovor Marinke Jeli u
kojem se ni Cvitan ni Vrankovieva prijava niti ne spominju(!). Obzirom da su mu 4 suda, policija, udruge za
zatitu ljudskih prava, Ministarstvo financija, Puka pravobraniteljica i Predsjednica RH dali za pravo, Vrankovi
je odluio po povratku iz Strasbourga iznova stupiti u trajk glau, kojim trai od HOK-a i Ministarstva pravosua
da rade po zakonu.20

President/Predsjednik:
___________________
(Drago Raspudi)

Members/lanovi:
________________ ________________ _________________ _______________
(Dubravka Milosavljevi) (Branka Peri) (Sonja taki) (Ante Vrankovi)

Dubravka Milosavljevi, Rogovske opatije 96, 23207 Sv. Filip i Jakov, Croatia, EU
Branka Peri, Alojzija Stepinca 19, 47000 Bjelovar, Croatia, EU
Drago Raspudi, Zapoljska 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia, EU
Sonja taki, Marka Mesia 3, 53243 Udbina, Croatia, EU
Ante Vrankovi, Domjanieva 15, 10380 Sv. Ivan Zelina, Croatia, EU

17 Vidjeti: http://www.maxportal.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/drago-raspudic-gubi-stan-sud-je-odluku-donio-nedjeljom-temeljem-krivotvorenih-dokumenata/
18 O sluaju je pisao Novi list i 24 sata: https://www.scribd.com/document/353461528/Sonja-%C5%A0taki%C4%87
19 Vidjeti prijavu na: https://www.scribd.com/document/319899381/Disciplinska-odgovornost-Dinka-Cvitana-za-neistinito-izvije%C5%A1%C4%87e-DORH-a-od-28-lipnja-2016

20 Detaljno o tome: https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suradnik:Ante_Vrankovi%C4%87 ; https://www.scribd.com/document/355945574/%C5%A0TRAJK-GLA%C4%90U-Otvoreno-pismo-HOK-u-8-8-

2017 ; http://www.hazud.hr/djelatnici-ministarstva-pravosuda-se-drsko-javno-izruguju-gradanima-disciplinskoj-prijavi-ministarstvu-pravosuda-marinke-jelic-odlucuje-marinka-jelic/