Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Japanese Tanks
Japanese Tanks
Wiki book
Contents
i
ii CONTENTS
1.10 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.11 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3 Type 89 I-Go 25
3.1 History and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.2 Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.3 Variants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.4 Combat history . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.4.1 Battle of Khalkhin Gol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.4.2 Other Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.5 World War II Japanese units equipped with the Type 89 Tank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.6 Survivors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.7 In Popular Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.8 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.9 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.10 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
4 Type 95 Ha-Go 30
4.1 History and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
CONTENTS iii
4.2 Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4.3 Variants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
4.4 Combat history . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.4.1 Khalkhin Gol (Nomonhan) 1939 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.4.2 British Malaya and Burma 1941 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
4.4.3 America's rst clash of armor in World War II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
4.4.4 10-year-old warhorse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
4.4.5 China-Burma-India theater of operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.4.6 Manchuria and the Kuril Islands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.5 Survivors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.6 Japanese WWII units equipped with Type 95 Ha-G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.7 Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.8 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4.9 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
4.10 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
5 Type 98 Ke-Ni 40
5.1 History and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
5.2 Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
5.3 Variants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
5.4 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
5.5 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
5.6 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
6 Type 3 Chi-Nu 42
6.1 History and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.2 Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.2.1 Armor and Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.2.2 Armament . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.2.3 Mobility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.3 Service record . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.4 Variants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.5 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.5.1 Tanks of comparable role, performance, and era . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
6.6 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
6.7 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
6.8 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
7 Type 5 Chi-Ri 45
7.1 History and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
7.2 Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
7.3 Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
iv CONTENTS
7.4 Variants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
7.5 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
7.6 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
7.7 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
8 Type 97 Chi-Ha 48
8.1 History and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
8.2 Japanese tank designations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
8.3 Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
8.3.1 Development of the improved Shinhoto Chi-Ha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
8.4 Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
8.5 Further development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
8.6 Combat history . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
8.6.1 Wars against China and the Soviet Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
8.6.2 World War II and beyond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
8.7 Variants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
8.8 Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
8.9 Survivors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
8.10 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
8.11 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
8.12 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
8.13 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
9 Type 4 Chi-To 53
9.1 Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
9.2 Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
9.3 Variants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
9.4 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
9.5 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
9.6 Further reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
9.7 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
9.8 Text and image sources, contributors, and licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
9.8.1 Text . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
9.8.2 Images . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
9.8.3 Content license . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Chapter 1
1.1 Overview
The First World War established the validity of the tank
concept. After the war, many nations needed to have
tanks, but only a few had the industrial resources to design
and build them. During and after World War I, Britain
and France were the intellectual leaders in tank design,
with other countries generally following and adopting
their designs. Japan took interest in tanks and procured
some of the foreign designs, and then went to build its
IJA 4th Armored Division with Type 3 Chi-Nu tanks and Type 3 own. The designs built were light tanks which Japan
Ho-Ni III tank destroyers used in China in the mid-1930s against opposing infantry
in campaigns in Manchuria and elsewhere in China, as
the Chinese National Revolutionary Army had only three
tank battalions consisting of Vickers export tanks, Ger-
man PzKpfw I light tanks, and Italian CV33 tankettes* [1]
to oppose them. Because of the Imperial Japanese Army
emphasis on the infantry at the expense of all other
branches, armored vehicle development and elding suf-
fered as a result; a shift to designs with heavier armor and
larger guns to ght against the larger tanks of the Allies
came too late for the Japanese to eld superior tanks on
the battleeld.
After the Second World War, the Supreme Commander
of the Allied Powers dismantled all military manufactur-
ing and development facilities in Japan, causing Japan to
lose the technology base required to manufacture tanks
and armored vehicles. However, due to the outbreak of
the Korean War, SCAP ordered Japan to re-militarize,
forming the Japanese Ground-Self Defense Force and
providing M4A3E8 Sherman and M24 Chaee tanks (an
initial plan to provide M26 Pershings was abandoned in
the face of State Department opposition). For various
reasons, including obsolescence of the tanks in JGSDF
service at the time, the JGSDF in 1954 was given the
option to either purchase new American built M46 Pat-
Japanese Type 95 Ha-Go rst prototype, 1934 tons and later the M47 Patton or develop its own Main
Battle Tank (MBT). The JGSDF decided to develop its
This article deals with the history and development of own tank, which resulted in the development of the cur-
tanks of the Japanese Army from their rst use after rent range of modern Japanese tanks built by Mitsubishi
1
2 CHAPTER 1. TANKS IN THE JAPANESE ARMY
Heavy Industries.
1.3 Naming system for tanks Experimental tank No.1 (Type 87 Chi-I), 1927
Ton tanks and Carden Loyd tankettes from the British and
used these as a basis for further development.* [5]
Building tanks of their own met several problems, as
Japan's priority tended to be with naval procurements so
production for tank steel would have been on a lower
level. However, they nally began designing tanks by
the mid-1920s. It was decided to build two dierent ex-
perimental tanks for evaluation, which diered from the
conventional practice of giving the same specications to
several competitors and having each make a prototype.
Development of the rst Japanese-designed tank began
in June 1925. A team of engineers in the motorcar group
of the Technical Bureau participated in the development,
Japanese tankettes in China at the attack on Wuhan
including a young army ocer, Major Tomio Hara who
later became the head of the tank development depart-
ment and would rise to the rank of General.* [6] The de-
sign was nished in May 1926 and the prototype was
completed by February 1927.* [7] After trials, the IJA de-
cided that the Type 87 Chi-I was too heavy at 20-ton and
too slow to be used as its main tank.* [8] The design was
rejected. A new requirement was issued for a lighter tank,
with a nominal 10-short-ton (9.1-metric-ton) weight. The
new design was modeled after the Vickers Medium C
which had been bought by the Japanese Army in March
1927. By 1929 the prototype of the Type 89 Chi-Ro (Ex-
perimental Tank Number 2) was completed.* [9]* [10]
Type 97 Te-Ke side view.
took over and remained the standard type until the end direct threat but it was too late. As with many innovative
of the war in 1945. Its shortcomings were clear since the weapons projects launched by Japan in the nal years of
Battle of Kalkin Go in 1939 though. The Shinhoto Chi- World War II, production could not advance beyond ei-
Ha, the same hull with a new turret to install a better gun ther small numbers or the prototype stage due to material
appeared only in 1942. While vulnerable to opposing Al- shortages, and the loss of Japan's industrial infrastructure
lied tanks (US M3 Lee/British M3 Grant, M4 Sherman to the Allied bombing of Japan.* [21]* [22]
and Soviet T-34), the 47 mm high-velocity gun did give
the Shinhoto some ghting chance against them. The 47
mm gun was eective against light tanks and against the
sides and rear of the Sherman tank.* [18] The Japanese
1.6 Post World War II
designed some additional models, some were produced
in limited numbers (such as the Chi-He or the Chi-Nu)
but none were mass-produced.
With the German armor led victories in Europe in 1940,
the Japanese changed their deployment and doctrine and
organized tank divisions.* [17] By 1940 they were the fth
largest tank force in the world behind the Soviet, France,
Britain and Germany, but were behind in medium and
heavy tanks. However, after 1941 the Japanese focused
their industry on building warships and aircraft after the
attack on Pearl Harbor brought the United States into the
conict, as priorities shifted to weapons they felt were
more important to attack across the Pacic and defend
the Empire against the American naval eet.* [19]
So although the Japanese Army widely employed tanks The M24, though it was popular amongst the Japanese
within the Pacic theater of war, the tanks that Allied crews, was inadequate when facing Soviet T-34/85s, as
forces in the Pacic faced were mostly older designs or seen in Korea. Thus, as the tanks in the Japan ground self-
even obsolete as the most modern Japanese tanks, such defence force (JGSDF) service at the time were obso-
as the Type 3 Chi-Nu were delayed by material and pro- lete/inadequate, the JGSDF was provided with the option
duction shortages. Even after they started to come out of of either purchasing the new American built M46 Patton
the factories the idea was to hold them for the defense of and, later, the M47 Patton or develop their own MBT in
the mainland, and not dispersed to the far ung Imperial 1954. Due to the high cost of purchasing American made
Japanese Army or Navy forces. Between 1931 and 1945, tanks, and because the M47 did not meet their require-
Japan produced 6450 tanks. Half of them (3300) were ments, the JGSDF decided on developing their own main
made by the Mitsubishi Company. The sub-total of tanks battle tank, resulting in the development of the Type 61
produced between 1940 and 1945 is 4424, i.e. a yearly tank.
average comparable to Italy. For a country as large and as The rst test vehicles, STA-1 (completed in December
industrialized as Japan, that is modest. This being due to 1956) and STA-2 (completed in February 1957) were
the higher priority of steel allocated to the Imperial Navy built and tested. The results were used to develop the
for warship construction.* [20] It changed to a degree in STA-3 (completed in January 1960) and STA-4 (com-
1944/45, when the homeland became increasingly under pleted in November 1959) in 1960. More improvements
6 CHAPTER 1. TANKS IN THE JAPANESE ARMY
gas chemical agent with an 8m width and the Disinfecting 1.7.4 Type 89 Chi-Ro medium tank
Vehicle version scattered "bleaching powder to counter-
act the poison gasor pathogenic agents.* [35] Main article: Type 89 Chi-Ro
The IJA decided that the Type 87 Chi-I was too heavy
Type 1 Chi-He
Main article: Type 4 Chi-To shiki chusensha Chi-ri) was the ultimate medium tank de-
The Type 4 medium tank Chi-To ( veloped by the Imperial Japanese Army in World War
II. Intended to be a heavier, lengthened, more powerful
version of Japan's sophisticated Type 4 Chi-To medium
tank, in performance it was designed to surpass the US
M4 Sherman medium tanks being elded by the Allied
forces. It was to be powered by a Kawasaki Type 98
800 HP engine Ha-9-IIbdetuned for the tank to 550 hp.
Originally, the tank was to be tted with the same Type
5 75 mm tank gun used on the Type 4 Chi-To.* [71]* [72]
Eventually, an 88 mm gun (based on the Type 99 88
mm AA Gun) was planned for the turret; a secondary
weapon of a front hull-mounted Type 1 37 mm tank gun
was tted in the position normally taken by a machine
Type 4 Chi-To medium tank. gun.* [22]* [71]
As with many innovative weapons projects launched by
Yonshiki chsensha Chi-To) was one of several Japan in the nal days of World War II, production could
12 CHAPTER 1. TANKS IN THE JAPANESE ARMY
hull mounted a Type 1 47 mm tank gun.* [83] Type 2 Ho-I Gun tank
The Type 1 Ho-Ni I was developed by utilizing the ex- Type 3 Ho-Ni III tank destroyer
isting Type 97 chassis and engine, and replacing the gun
turret with a 75 mm Type 90 Field Gun mounted in an Main article: Type 3 Ho-Ni III
open casemate with frontal and side armour only, which The Type 3 Ho-Ni III ( III San-
made it very vulnerable in close combat.* [84] The Type shiki hsensha) gun tank was a tank destroyer and self-
1 Ho-Ni I was designed to operate as self-propelled ar- propelled artillery of Imperial Japanese Army in World
tillery in the armored divisions.* [85]* [84] The mounting War II. The Type 3 No-Ni II superseded the Type 1 Ho-
for the 75 mm Type 90 eld gun allowed for ten degrees Ni I in production, and was much safer for the crew due
of traverse and elevation from 5 to +25 degrees.* [85] to its having a completely enclosed superstructure.* [84]
One variant produced was known as the Type 1 Ho-Ni The Type 3 Ho-Ni III utilized the chassis of the earlier
II which mounted a Type 91 105 mm howitzer. It had Type 97 Chi-Ha medium tank.
a slightly changed superstructure as far as the side armor The main armament of the Type 3 Ho-Ni III was a
with re-positioned observation visors.* [86] Type 3 75 mm tank gun, based on the 75 mm Type
14 CHAPTER 1. TANKS IN THE JAPANESE ARMY
90 Field Gun, which was also used in the Type 3 Chi- 1.7.18 German-inuenced variants
Nu tank.* [22]* [65] Previous gun tanks, Type 1 Ho-Ni I
and Type 2 Ho-I, were not really optimized designs. The Throughout the war Germany supplied blueprints, tech-
fully enclosed and armored casemate of the Type 3 Ho-Ni nological support, and some examples of their tanks to
III was intended to address these issues, and an order of Japan in accordance with the Tripartite Pact signed by the
57 was placed with Hitachi Ltd in early 1944.* [84] Pro- Axis powers. Some of knowledge shared with Japan in-
duction was hampered by material shortages, and by the spired or inuenced later Japanese armored vehicles, for
bombing of Japan in World War II, and only 31 to 41 were example:
completed.* [90]* [91] The Type 3 Ho-Ni III tank destroy-
ers were assigned to various combat units, most stationed Type 3 Chi-Nu medium tank, roughly equivalent to
within the Japanese home islands to defend against the Panzer IV tanks.
projected Allied Invasion. As the surrender of Japan oc-
curred before that invasion, there is no record of the Type Type 4 Chi-To medium tank with Type 5 75 mm
3 Ho-Ni III ever being used in actual combat.* [90] tank gun; a variant of the Type 4 75 mm AA Gun,
inspired by the Panther tank.
Type 5 Na-To tank destroyer Type 5 Chi-Ri heavy tank with Type 99 88 mm AA
Gun, inspired by the Tiger I.
Main article: Type 5 Na-To
Type 1 Ho-Ha halftrack, inspired by the SdKfz 251
The Type 5 Na-To ( Go-shiki hsensha) was
O-I superheavy tank and experimental ultraheavy
tank, equivalent to the Panzer VIII Maus
Type 10 uses the same 120 mm smoothbore gun as the [30] Zaloga 2007, p. 7.
Type 90, which is made by Japan Steel Works.* [25] The [31] Coox 1985, pp. 154, 157.
gun re newly developed APFSDS, type 10 APFSDS.
Type 10 can re JM33 APFSDS or all standard 120 [32] Tomczyk 2002, pp. 46, 54.
mm NATO ammunition. However, Type 10 APFSDS
[33] Tomczyk 2002, pp. 39, 46.
is specically designed for and can only be red by the
Type 10's gun.* [99] [34] Report on Type 92 from September 1945 issue of Intel-
ligence Bulletin
[58] Zaloga 2007, pp. 10, 11. [94] Tomczyk 2005, pp. 22, 30.
18
2.3. JAPANESE DESIGNS 19
Type 89 Chi-Ro advancing towards Manila, Philippines, January tanks (M3 Stuart light tanks in the Philippines) during
1942 World War II; and the only enemy tanks to have ever
landed on North American soil during any war.* [24]* [25]
and too slow to be used as its main tank, so the Type Several variants were built, among them: the prototype
89 Chi-Ro was developed to overcome these shortcom- Type 3 Ke-Ri, which mounted a 57 mm Model 97 gun;
ings.* [14] The new design weighed 12.8 tons and used the Type 4 Ke-Nu; and the Type 5 Ho-Ru, a proto-
stronger and lighter steel plate instead of the Type 87's type casemate-hulled turretless self-propelled gun simi-
iron armor. Armament was a Type 90 57 mm gun, lar to the German Hetzer, but with a Type 1 47 mm tank
along with two Type 91 6.5mm machine guns.* [15] The gun.* [26]
Type 89 design was completed in 1929, with production
starting in 1931, making this the rst tank to be mass-
produced in Japan.* [16] The Type 89 had two variants - 2.3.4 Type 97 Chi-Ha medium tank
the KA
( ), which used a water-cooled gasoline engine,
and the Otsu (B), with an air-cooled diesel engine and
improved frontal armor.* [16] Of the two versions made,
a total of 113 K tanks and 291 Otsu tanks were pro-
duced.* [17] The Type 89 rst saw combat in China, but
was in the process of being replaced by the Type 97 Chi-
Ha by the start of World War II. The designation is also
known as the Type 89 I-Goand sometimes translit-
erated Yi-Go.* [18]* [19]
Kyuhachi-shiki keisensha Ke-Ni) was designed to replace Main article: Type 3 Chi-Nu
the Imperial Japanese Army's Type 95 Ha-Go light tank. The Type 3 Chi-Nu medium tank was urgently de-
It is also referred to as the Type 98 Chi-Ni light tank by
some sources.* [31] Although developed in 1938 to ad-
dress deciencies in the Type 95 design already apparent
from combat experience in Manchukuo and China in the
Second Sino-Japanese War. The prototype of the new
Type 98 tank was completed in 1939 but production did
not begin until 1942. With the start of World War II,
the Imperial Japanese Army General Sta quickly real-
ized that the Type 95 design was vulnerable to heavy ma-
chinegun re - 0.5 in (13 mm) - and as such attempted
to develop a light tank with the same weight as the Type
95, but with thicker armor.* [32] The Type 98 had a two-
man turret, an improvement on the asymmetrical turret
used on the Type 95, carrying a Type 100 37mm tank
gun, with a muzzle velocity of 760 m/s (2,500 ft/s) and Type 3 Chi-Nu
with a coaxial 7.7 mm machine-gun to the side. A to-
veloped to counter the American M4 Sherman medium
tal of 104 Type 98s are known to have been built: 1 in
1941, 24 in 1942 and 79 in 1943.* [33] One prototype tank. Originally, the next tank in development to replace
the Chi-He was the Type 4 Chi-To medium tank. How-
variant built was the Type 98 Ta-Se, an anti-aircraft tank
which mounted a 20 mm AA gun.* [34] Another variant ever, the development of the Chi-To and the Type 5 Chi-
was known as the Type 2 Ke-To light tank, which be- Ri were delayed, and a stopgap tank was required.* [37]
gan production in 1944. It mounted an improved Type 1The development of Chi-Nu started in May 1943 and was
nished by October. The low priority given tanks, along
37mm gun in an enlarged turret.* [32] However, only 34
tanks were completed by the end of the war.* [35] with the raw material shortages meant that the Type 3
did not enter production until 1944.* [38] The Chi-Nu re-
tained the same chassis and suspension of the Type 97
2.3.6 Type 1 Chi-He medium tank but with a large new hexagonal gun turret and a comman-
der's cupola.* [39] The main armament, a Type 3 75 mm
Main article: Type 1 Chi-He tank gun, was one of the largest guns used on Japanese
The Type 1 Chi-He was developed in 1942 to replace tanks.* [40] The Chi-Nu was the last IJA tank deployed,
the Type 97. The newer tank proved to be superior to and production continued until the end of the war. The
22 CHAPTER 2. JAPANESE TANKS OF WORLD WAR II
Yonshiki chsensha Chi-To) was one of several 2.3.10 Experimental Type 5 Ho-Ri tank
new medium and heavy tanks developed by the Imperial destroyer
Japanese Army towards the end of World War II. It was
by far the most advanced Japanese wartime tank to reach
the production phase.* [41]
The Type 4 Chi-To was a thirty-ton, all-welded tank
with a maximum armor thickness of about 75 mm.
It was much larger than the Type 97 Chi-Ha, with
a longer, wider, tall chassis, supported by seven road
wheels.* [6]* [42] The main armament, a Type 5 75 mm
tank gun was housed in a large powered, well-armoured
hexagonal gun turret along with a coaxial machine gun. A
single Type 97 heavy tank machine gun was mounted in
the front hull. Only two Type 4 Chi-To tanks were com- Experimental Type 5 gun tank Ho-Ri I mock-up scale model
pleted prior to the end of the war with an additional four
chassis being manufactured. Neither of the two com- See also: Type 5 Chi-Ri
pleted units saw combat use.* [41]* [43]
The Ho-Ri was a more powerful tank destroyer (gun
2.3.9 Type 5 Chi-Ri medium tank tank) using a 105 mm cannon in place of the 75 mm
design and an additional 37 mm gun. It was to use the
Main article: Type 5 Chi-Ri Type 5 Chi-Ri tank chassis. The superstructure for the
The Type 5 medium tank Chi-Ri ( Go- main gun was placed at the rear and the engine was to
shiki chusensha Chi-ri) was the ultimate medium tank de- be placed in the center area of the chassis.* [47] Another
veloped by the Imperial Japanese Army in World War version was to have a twin 25 mm anti-aircraft gun on
II. Intended to be a heavier, lengthened, more powerful top of the rear superstructure.* [48] No prototypes were
version of Japan's sophisticated Type 4 Chi-To medium built.* [49]
tank, in performance it was designed to surpass the US
M4 Sherman medium tanks being elded by the Allied
forces. Originally, the tank was to be tted with the
2.3.11 O-I superheavy tank
same Type 5 75 mm tank gun used on the Type 4 Chi-
To.* [44]* [45] Eventually, an 88 mm gun (based on the Main article: O-I
Type 99 88 mm AA Gun) was planned for the turret; a
secondary weapon of a front hull-mounted Type 1 37 mm The O-I experimental superheavy tank had three turrets
tank gun was tted in the position normally taken by a and weighed 120 tons, and required a crew of 11 men.
machine gun.* [6]* [44] It was 10 meters long by 4.2 meters wide with an overall
2.4. SEE ALSO 23
Type 2 Ka-Mi being tested by Australian soldiers, 1945 List of Japanese armored divisions
In the period between 1931 and 1938 the Japanese built [10] Tomczyk 2002, pp. 6, 7.
nearly 1,700 new tanks* [17] giving them, by 1940, the
[11] Tomczyk 2002, p. 7.
5th largest tank force in the world.* [55] By 1937, Japan
elded 1,060 tanks in 8 regiments. The peak of Japanese [12] Tomczyk 2002, pp. 7, 10.
tank production was in 1942, but declined afterwards ow-
ing to aircraft and warship priorities, along with mate- [13] Hara 1972, pp. 1517.
rial shortages. By 1944, total production of tanks and [14] Tomczyk 2002, pp. 7, 10, 17.
AFV's had fallen to 925 and for 1945, only 256 were pro-
duced.* [33] Japan developed many experimental and op- [15] Tomczyk 2002, pp. 19, 25.
24 CHAPTER 2. JAPANESE TANKS OF WORLD WAR II
[16] Zaloga 2007, pp. 5, 6. [52] Taki's Imperial Japanese Army: Type 2 Amphibious Ve-
hicle Ka-Mi
[17] Zaloga 2007, p. 10.
[53] Zaloga 2007, pp. 23, 24.
[18] Tomczyk 2002, p. 17.
[54] Taki's Imperial Japanese Army: Type 3 Amphibious
[19] Zaloga 2007, p. 5. Tank Ka-Chi
[20] Zaloga 2007, pp. 10, 17. [55] Zaloga 2007, p. 3; Japan was in the forefront of tank
[21] Tomczyk 2002, pp. 67, 74. technology in the 1930s.
[28] Zaloga 2007, p. 11. Hara, Tomio (1972). Japanese Medium Tanks.
AFV Weapons Proles No. 49. Prole Publications
[29] Zaloga 2007, pp. 13, 14. Limited.
[30] Zaloga 2007, p. 14. Hara, Tomio (1973). Japanese Combat Cars, Light
[31] History of War: Type 98 Light Tank Tanks, and Tankettes. AFV Weapons Prole No.
54. Prole Publications Limited.
[32] Zaloga 2007, p. 18.
Hunnicutt, R. P. (1992). Stuart: A History of the
[33] Zaloga 2007, p. 17. American Light Tank. Volume One. Presidio Press.
[34] Tomczyk 2007, p. 14. ISBN 978-0-89141-462-9.
[35] Zaloga 2007, pp. 17, 18. Tomczyk, Andrzej (2002). Japanese Armor Vol. 1.
AJ Press. ISBN 83-7237-097-4.
[36] Zaloga 2007, pp. 21, 22.
Tomczyk (II), Andrzej (2007) [2002]. Japanese Ar-
[37] Taki's Imperial Japanese Army: Tanks after Chi-Ha mor Vol. 2. AJ Press. ISBN 978-8372371119.
[38] Tomczyk 2005, p. 3.
Tomczyk, Andrzej (2003). Japanese Armor Vol. 3.
[39] Tomczyk 2005, pp. 3, 32. AJ Press. ISBN 978-8372371287.
[40] Tomczyk 2005, pp. 3, 5. Tomczyk, Andrzej (2005). Japanese Armor Vol. 4.
AJ Press. ISBN 978-8372371676.
[41] History of War: Type 4 Chi-To Medium Tank Retrieved
10 December 2014 Tomczyk, Andrzej (2007). Japanese Armor Vol. 5.
AJ Press. ISBN 978-8372371799.
[42] Tomczyk 2005, pp. 19, 20.
[43] Tomczyk 2005, pp. 19, 2022, 30. Zaloga, Steven J. (2007). Japanese Tanks 193945.
Osprey. ISBN 978-1-8460-3091-8.
[44] History of War: Type 5 Chi-Ri Medium Tank Retrieved
10 December 2014
Type 89 I-Go
The Type 89 medium tank I-Go ( ter the Vickers Medium tank.* [7] By February 1927, the
Hachiky-shiki ch-sensha I-g) was a medium tank Type 87 Chi-I medium tank was ready for trials. How-
used by the Imperial Japanese Army from 1932 to 1942 ever, it was 20-ton and under-powered.* [8] The weight of
in combat operations of the Second Sino-Japanese War, the initial prototype and its low speed did not impress the
at Khalkhin Gol against the Soviet Union, and in the Imperial Japanese Army General Sta Oce, and a new
Second World War. The Type 89B model was the world's requirement was issued for a lighter tank, with a nomi-
rst mass-produced diesel engine tank.* [2] The tank was nal 10-short-ton (9.1-metric-ton) weight. The new design
armed with a short-barrel 57 mm cannon for knocking was modeled after the Vickers Medium C which had been
out pillboxes and masonry fortications, and proved ef- bought by the Japanese Army in March 1927.* [9]
fective in campaigns in Manchuria and China, as the By April 1928, the new light tank design was nished and
Chinese National Revolutionary Army had only three designated as the Type 89. The prototype of the Type
tank battalions to oppose them, which consisted primar- 89 light tank ( 1 ) was com-
ily of Vickers export models, German Panzer Is, and pleted in 1929.* [6] Later, the Type 89 was re-classied
Italian CV33 tankettes.* [3] The Type 89 was a 1920s as amedium tankbecause the weight increased to over
design medium tank, built to support the infantry, and 10 tons due to several improvements.
thus lacked the armor or armament of 1940s generation
Allied armor; and was regarded as obsolete by the time As the Army's Sagami Arsenal lacked the capacity for
of the 1939 battles of Khalkhin Gol, against the Soviet mass production, a contract was awarded to Mitsubishi
Union.* [4] The code designation I-Gocomes from Heavy Industries, which built a new tank factory to
the katakana letter [] forrstand the kanji [] for specically produce this model.* [6] Production of the
number. The designation is also transliterated Chi-Ro Type 89 began in 1931 and it soon became the main tank
and sometimes Yi-Go.* [5]* [6] of the Imperial Japanese Army.* [10]
Although the Type 89 was well regarded by the Japanese
Army, there were several small problems to be rectied,
notably a gap under the mantlet on early models that al-
lowed rie re to enter the turret. Work continued on
improving the Type 89 after the production started, and
as a result variants were developed.* [11]
3.2 Design
Experimental tank No.1(ja: 1 ), 1927 (Imperial The Type 89 required a crew of four (comman-
year 2587) der/gunner, loader, driver and hull gunner).
The design of the Type 89 was relatively conventional
with a forward-mounted gun turret carrying the main ar-
mament, a Type 90 57 mm gun that was complemented
3.1 History and development by two Type 91 6.5 mm machine guns. One was placed
in the turret and pointed towards the rear, a practice fol-
The Type 89 evolved from Japan's rst domestic tank lowed with most Japanese tanks, and one was located in
project initiated by the Japanese Army's Osaka Techni- the hull.* [12] The Type 90 57 mm Tank Gun had a bar-
cal Arsenal in 1925. The original plan was for two types rel length of 0.85 metres (33 in) (L14.9) el angle of re
of tanks to be created. A light tank at 10-ton based on the of 15 to +20 degrees, AZ angle of re of 20 degrees,
French Renault FT tank and a 20-ton design modeled af- muzzle velocity of 380 m/s (1,200 ft/s), and could pene-
25
26 CHAPTER 3. TYPE 89 I-GO
3.3 Variants
Type 89A I-Go K ( )
- The initial production model had a water-cooled
Daimler-type 100 hp engine (
da-shiki hyaku-bariki hatsudki) 6-cylinder Japanese tanks moving toward Manila, January 1942.
gasoline engine and mounted a machine gun on the
right side of the hull.* [6] This design could only at-The Type 89 was deployed for infantry support opera-
tain 15.5 km/h, and was also limited by the severe tions in the Second Sino-Japanese War. It served with
winter climate in northern China. A total of 113 Japanese infantry divisions before that, and rst saw com-
tanks were produced.* [15] bat use during the First Battle of Shanghai in 1932.* [17]
The short-barreled 57 mm gun was eective at destroy-
ing machine gun nests and its 15 mm (0.59 in) armor,
Type 89B I-Go Otsu () although thin, was enough to stop small arms re. The
- The Ko was superseded in production from 1934 relatively low speed of 25 km/h *(16 mph) was not an is-
by the model Otsu with an air-cooled Mitsubishi sue in these types of operations. [18]
A6120VD 120 hp diesel engine.* [6] The improved The following year, the Japanese Army formed its rst in-
model had a new asymmetric shapedgun tur- dependent armor force by creating three regiments armed
ret complete with a cupola for the commander, and with the Type 89 I-Go,* [2] each consisting of two com-
with the machine gun relocated to the left side of panies with ten tanks each. Three more regiments were
the hull.* [10] The multiple armor plates of the front formed in 1934. Type 89s were the main medium tank
3.5. WORLD WAR II JAPANESE UNITS EQUIPPED WITH THE TYPE 89 TANK 27
of the Japanese military through 1937 and were used in moved several thousands yards* [26] where they met up
various campaigns throughout China after 1937.* [19] with Japanese infantry.
The 4th Tank Regiment had expended 1,100 37 mm and
3.4.1 Battle of Khalkhin Gol 129 57 mm tank shells during the ght, as well as about
16,000 machine gun rounds. Of the approximate 73 light
and medium Japanese tanks from both regiments com-
mitted to the oensive, 13 were damaged beyond re-
pair by Soviet gunre, about 14 others were repaired af-
ter major overhauls, and 17 tanks were repaired in the
eld.* [27]
Soviet forces concluded that the 1st Tank Corps had pen-
etrated the defenses of their 9th Armored Brigade and
149th Infantry Regiment and had reached Soviet artillery
positions.* [28]
Sinbudai Old Weapon Museum, Camp Asaka, [29] Foss. The Great Book of Tanks.
Japan [30] Dunstan, Vietnam Tracks: Armor in Battle 1945-1975,
pp. 1011.
Villa Escudero, Tiaong, Quezon Province, Philip-
pines [31] http://girls-und-panzer.jp/mecha_89shiki.html
3.10. EXTERNAL LINKS 29
3.9 References
Coox, Alvin D. (1985). Nomonhan: Japan Against
Russia, 1939 (Two volumes). Stanford, California:
Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-1160-7.
Type 95 Ha-Go
30
4.2. DESIGN 31
Type 95 light tank Ha-Go 1st Prototype, before the weight reduc-
tion modication.
Due to issues in Manchukuo with sorghum grass in elds Type 3 Ke-Ri proposition
getting trapped in the suspension/wheels, the wheel sus-
pension components were inverted so the tanks could This was a proposed model with a Type 97 57
move freely through the grass. This modied version was mm gun as the main armament. This design
used in the Battle for Nomohan. never got past testing in 1943.
The Type 95 So-Ki was a armored rail- Main article: Type 4 Ke-Nu
road car designed to a requirement of the
Kwantung Army for patrolling and guarding
remote narrow gauge railway lines. It was t- The conversion that replaced the existing turret
ted with a retractable wheel arrangement un- with the large turret of Type 97 Chi-Ha, armed
derneath to enable it to run on rails. Between with the low-velocity 57 mm gun. The conver-
121 and 138 units were manufactured between sion was done in 1944, with approximately 100
1935 and 1943, which operated in both China units completed.* [24]
and Burma.* [18]* [19]
4.4. COMBAT HISTORY 33
The Ho-Ru was a light tank destroyer simi- Under the mistaken belief that the Red Army was retreat-
lar to the German Hetzer, but armed with the ing from the area of the Khalkhyn Gol river,* [38] the IJA
weaker 47 mm main gun (Type 1 47 mm tank command in Manchuria transferred the 1st Tank Corps,
gun). The Type 5 Ho-Ru utilized the chassis under the command of Lt. Gen. Yasuoka Masaomi to the
of the Type 95 Ha-Go, but its suspension was village of Nomonhan to cut o the retreating Soviets at
enlarged to 350 mm track link width. There Khalkhyn Gol.* [39] After a two-day journey by rail, the
were two set rows of wheel guide pins, holding 1st Tank Corps began unloading its 3th Tank Regiment
a road wheel between them. The sprocket of and 4th Tank Regiment from their trains at Arshaan in
the driving wheel was the grating type to gear Manchuria on 22 June 1939. While the 3rd Tank Reg-
with the wheel guide pins like on the Soviet iment was composed primarily of the nearly decade-old
T-34. The development of the Type 5 Ho-Ru Type 89 medium tanks, the 4th Tank Regiment, com-
started in February 1945 with only a single pro- manded by 48-year-old Col. Tamada Yoshio, consisted
totype being completed before the end of the of 35 Type 95 light tanks, eight Type 89s, and three Type
war.* [26]* [27] 94 tankettes.* [40]
From the beginning of Soviet General Zhukov's assump-
tion of command at Nomonhan in June 1939,* [41] he
4.4 Combat history had deployed his BT-5 and BT-7 light tanks (Bystrokhod-
nyi tanks, meaning high-speed tank* [42]) and incor-
It is considered one of the best light tanks in 1935, being porated them into all of his combined artillery, infantry,
armed with a 37 mm cannon, and powered by a diesel and armor attacks.* [43] Although in the same light tank
engine, a fuel considered by some to be superior due to category as the Type 95, also with 3 man crews, and
its low volatility.* [16]* [28]* [29]* [30]* [31] As with most similar dimensions, the BT tanks were nearly twice as
armies in the 1930s, including the US Army, the tank, heavy, at 13.8 tons* [42] but were highly susceptible to
and the light tank in particular, were used primarily to close-quarter (tank killer) teams* [44] using re bombs
support infantry* [32] or serve as cavalry reconnaissance (molotov cocktails* [45]); which was primarily due to
and to a lesser extent, as raiding vehicles. Its speed was their gasoline engines.* [30]* [46] As such, Japanese tank
about 18 mph cross country, which was comparable to the crews held a generally low opinion of the Soviet Army
M3 Stuart's 20 mph nearly 6 years later in 1941.* [3]* [33] tanks, but the BT tank's 45 mm gun was an altogether
In armor, road speed, and weaponry, the Type 95 was dierent matter. With a velocity of over 2,000 feet per
far inferior to the (ve years older) American M3 Stu- second, Soviet tanks could penetrate the Japanese tanks at
art light tanks, but the environment of the Philippines a range of over 1,000 meters (the Type 95's 37 mm main
(where roads were sparse and tank engagements took gun had a maximum eective range of less than 700 me-
place at near point blank range) largely minimized these ters* [17]); as one Type 95 tank ocer put it, "...no sooner
34 CHAPTER 4. TYPE 95 HA-GO
U.S. Army Museum of Hawaii, United States 2nd Independent Tank Company
Indiana Military Museum, United States 1st Company of 4th Tank Regiment
Adisorn Cavalry Centre, Saraburi, Thailand 3rd Company of 4th Tank Regiment
Australian War Memorial, Australia (undergoing 2nd Tank Division
restoration* [74]* [75])
26th Tank Regiment
Reserve Aairs Center, Thailand
27th Tank Regiment
Surasakmontree Army Camp, Lampang, Thailand
11th Tank Regiment
Cavalry Tank Museum, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra,
India* [76] Training Group of Kungchuling Army Tank School
of Kwantung Army.
Units equipped with Type 95 Ha-G: Itoh SNLF Detachment (Navy Gr.)
The Chinese Red Army captured examples from [22] Tomczyk 2003, p. 30.
the National Revolutionary Army (in turn captured
[23] Zaloga 2007, p. 17.
from the Japanese) and received others captured by
the Soviet Union. They were used in the Chinese [24] History of War: Type 4 Ke-Nu
Civil War and the Korean War alongside the Type
97 Chi-Ha. [25] Takis Imperial Japanese Army: THE DEVELOPMENT
OF IMPERIAL JAPANESE TANKS, Self-Propelled
Guns
France
[26] Zaloga 2007, p. 20.
[10] Tomczyk 2002, pp. 64, 66. [42] Coox 1985, p. 641, notation #23.
[11] Tomczyk 2002, pp. 67, 74. [43] Coox 1985, p. 1089.
[12] Type 95 Ha-Go5, Type 95 Ke-Go5, Type 3 Ke-Ri, Type [44] Coox 1985, p. 318.
4 Ke-Nu, Type 5 Ke-Ho. WWII Vehicles.com. [45] Coox & 1985 309.
[13] US Department of War, Japanese Tank and Anti-Tank [46] Coox 1985, p. 437.
Warfare. United States Government Printing Oce.
Washington D.C., p. 80. [47] Coox 1985, p. 362.
[14] U.S. War Department Japanese Light Tank Tactical [48] Coox 1985, p. 370.
and Technical Trends, No. 31, August 12, 1943.
[49] Coox 1985, p. 371.
[15] History of War: Type 95 Ha-Go Light Tank
[50] Coox 1985, p. 381.
[16] War Department, TM-E 30-480 pp. IX-183, 184
[51] Coox 1985, p. 383.
[17] Coox 1985, p. 433.
[52] Coox 1985, p. 385.
[18] Zaloga (II) 2008, p. 24.
[53] Coox 1985, p. 394.
[19] Takis Imperial Japanese Army: Type 95 Armored Rail-
road Car So-Ki [54] Coox 1985, p. 386.
[21] Tomczyk 2003, pp. 29, 30. [56] Coox 1985, p. 395.
4.10. EXTERNAL LINKS 39
[57] Horner, David (1995).The Gunners: A History of Aus- Hara, Tomio (1973). Japanese Combat Cars, Light
tralian Artillery. Forgotten Campaign: The Dutch East Tanks, and Tankettes. AFV Weapons Prole No.
Indies Campaign 19411942. 54. Prole Publications Limited.
[58] Zaloga 2007, pp. 15, 17. Hunnicutt, Richard (1992). Stuart, A history of the
[59] Zaloga 2007, pp. 16, 17. American Light Tank Volume 1. Novato, California:
Presidio Press. ISBN 0-89141-462-2.
[60] Zaloga 2007, pp. 15, 16.
Handbook on Japanese Military Forces, TM-E 30-
[61] Foss, The Great Book of Tanks 480 (1945). TM-E 30-480. War Department.
[62] Hunnicutt (Stuart) p. 395 Tomczyk, Andrzej (2002). Japanese Armor Vol. 1.
[63] Hunnicutt (Stuart) p. 478 AJ Press. ISBN 83-7237-097-4.
[64] Zaloga (Armored Thunderbolt) pp. 229, 230 Tomczyk, Andrzej (2003). Japanese Armor Vol. 3.
AJ Press. ISBN 978-8372371287.
[65] Zaloga 2007, p. 17, photo caption.
Zaloga, Steven J. (1999). M3 & M5 Stuart Light
[66] Zaloga (M3/M5 Stuart) p. 15 Tank 194045. Osprey. ISBN 978-1-85532-911-
[67] Hunnicutt (Stuart) p. 475
9.
[68] Hunnicutt states that the British M3s were destroyed (to Zaloga, Steven J. (2007). Japanese Tanks 193945.
prevent enemy use) during the British retreat, however the Osprey. ISBN 978-1-8460-3091-8.
photo on page 397 shows them intact. Likewise, Zaloga
states that some were ultimatelyre-usedby the enemy.
Zaloga, Steven J. (2008). Armored Thunderbolt, the
US Army Sherman in World War II. Mechanicsville,
[69] Hunnicutt (Stuart) p. 396 PA (USA): Stackpole Books. ISBN 978-0-8117-
0424-3.
[70] Zaloga 2007, p. 40.
Zaloga (II), Steven J. (2008). Armored Trains. Os-
[71] http://www.1937china.com/xsyj/xsdt/20131120/16955.
shtml
prey. ISBN 978-1-8460-3242-4.
4.9 References
Coox, Alvin D. (1985). Nomonhan; Japan Against
Russia, 1939 (Two volumes). Stanford, California:
Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-1160-7.
Type 98 Ke-Ni
The Type 98 light tank Ke-Ni ( of bogies with six road-wheels connected to the chas-
Kyuhachi-shiki keisensha Ke-Ni) or Type 98A Ke-Ni Ko sis using bell cranks, which transferred any movement
(also known as Type 98 Chi-Ni light tank* [2]) was de- in the bogies into sideways motion that was absorbed by
signed to replace the Imperial Japanese Army's Type 95 springs.* [2]
Ha-Go light tank, Japan's most numerous armored ght- In contrast to the one-man turret of Type 95, the Type 98
ing vehicle during World War II. Although designed be-
had a two-man turret, which oered more room for the
fore World War II, production did not start until 1942, gunner/commander and carried a Type 100 37 mm tank
with 104 being produced by the end of the war.* [1]
gun, with a muzzle velocity of 760 m/s, and also a coaxial
7.7 mm machine gun.* [2]* [3]
40
5.6. EXTERNAL LINKS 41
gun featuring a muzzle velocity of 800 m/s.* [7] 5.6 External links
The new 37 mm gun used gave the tank
slightly better performance.* [3] The Type History of War: Type 98 Chini Light Tank
2 Ke-To went into production in 19441945
with 34 tanks built.* [8] Taki's Imperial Japanese Army Page: Type 98 Light
Tank Ke-Ni
Type 98 Ta-Se 20 mm anti-aircraft tank
5.4 Notes
[1] Zaloga 2007, p. 17.
5.5 References
Foss, Christopher (2003). Great Book of Tanks: The
World's Most Important Tanks from World War I to
the Present Day. Zenith Press. ISBN 0-7603-1475-
6.
Foss, Christopher (2003). Tanks: The 500. Crest-
line. ISBN 0-7603-1500-0.
Tomczyk, Andrzej (2007). Japanese Armor Vol. 5.
AJ Press. ISBN 978-8372371799.
Zaloga, Steven J. (2007). Japanese Tanks 193945.
Osprey. ISBN 978-1-8460-3091-8.
Chapter 6
Type 3 Chi-Nu
42
6.4. VARIANTS 43
6.2.3 Mobility
Type 5 Chi-Ri
The Type 5 medium tank Chi-Ri ( stead of the seven of the Chi-To. It had the usual Japanese
Go-shiki chusensha Chi-ri) (Imperial Year 2605 track arrangement with forward mounted drive sprockets
Medium Tank Model 9) was the ultimate medium tank and rear mounted idlers. The Type 5 Chi-Ri had sloped
developed by the Imperial Japanese Army in World War welded armor, with a maximum thickness of 75 mm at
II. Intended to be a heavier, more powerful version of the front hull; 2550 mm on the side; 50 mm on the rear
Japan's sophisticated Type 4 Chi-To medium tank, in and 50 mm on the turret.* [1]* [6]
performance it was designed to surpass the US M4 Sher- The Type 5 Chi-Ri was initially to be powered by a Mit-
man medium tanks being elded by the Allied forces. A
subishi Diesel engine, but the advancements needed to
single prototype was incomplete when the war ended. provide the necessary horsepower fell behind schedule,
and an 800 hp V-12 gasoline-fueled aircraft engine de-
signed by BMW in Germany and licensed to Kawasaki
7.1 History and development Heavy Industries in Japan was selected instead. The
Kawasaki Type 98 800 HP engine Ha-9-IIbwas de-
tuned for the tank to 550 hp.* [6]* [7]
Based on battleeld information from the Eastern Front,
Department of Arm Weaponry published a report de-
manding a shift of tank design focus from Infantry tank
to tanks specialised for anti-tank missions. The Army's
requirements for the new medium tanks were an increase
of weight from 20 tonnes to 35 tonnes and an armour up-
grade from 50 mm to 75 mm. The new tank would be
mounted with a new 75 mm gun instead of the previous
57 mm anti-tank gun. Production focus would also pri-
oritise quality over quantity. The new medium tank was
designated as Type 5 Medium Tank Chi-Ri (
).* [2]
A single unarmed prototype of the Type 5 Chi-Ri was
completed by May 1945. The project was abruptly aban-
doned to free up manpower and critical resources to con-
centrate on the development and production of the more Type 5 75 mm tank gun Mark I (semi-auto loader)
practical Type 4 Chi-To medium tank.* [3] As with many
The tank had a hexagonal gun turret and on the left side
innovative weapons projects launched by Japan in the
of the turret roof was a commander's cupola. In front of
nal years of World War II, production could not ad-
that was a crew hatch.* [8]
vance beyond either small numbers or the prototype stage
due to material shortages, and the loss of Japan's indus- Originally, the prototype tank was to be tted with the
trial infrastructure to the Allied bombing of Japan.* [4] It
same Type 5 75 mm tank gun (based on the Type 4 75
was the last tank developedby the Imperial Japanese mm AA Gun) used on the Type 4 Chi-To.* [7] However,
Army.* [5] eventually an 88 mm gun (based on the Type 99 88 mm
AA Gun) was planned for the main turret gun; a sec-
ondary weapon of a front hull-mounted Type 1 37 mm
tank gun was tted in the position normally taken by a
7.2 Design machine gun.* [1]* [3] Alternatively, the design called for
using two Type 97 heavy tank machine guns in place of
The Type 5 Chi-Ri featured a lengthened version of the the front hull-mounted Type 1 37 mm tank gun.* [1]* [5]
Type 4 Chi-To chassis, with eight road wheels per side in- Accordingly to another source, the design called for a ball
45
46 CHAPTER 7. TYPE 5 CHI-RI
mount for a Type 97 machine gun on the left side of the have a crew of six. It was to use the Type 5 Chi-Ri tank
turret for use in close combat situations.* [6] There were chassis. The superstructure for the main gun was placed
also plans for a Type 5 Chi-Ri II, to be diesel powered at the rear and the engine was positioned in the center
and using the Type 5 75 mm tank gun as its main arma- area of the chassis; similar in design to the German Fer-
ment.* [9] dinand/Elefant heavy tank destroyer.* [11] Another ver-
sion was to have a twin 25 mm anti-aircraft gun on top of
the rear superstructure in a swivel mount.* [12] No
7.3 Service prototypes were built.* [13]
Yet another version planned was the Ho-Ri II heavy tank
As with the Type 4 Chi-To medium tanks, the Type 5 destroyer. It was to use the Type 5 Chi-Ri tank chassis.
Chi-Ri tanks were chosen for the nal defenses of the The boxy superstructure for the main gun was completely
Japanese home islands against the expected Allied inva- integral with the hull's sides and placed at the center of the
sions. However, only the one unarmed prototype had chassis (similar in design to the German Jagdtiger). The
been completed by the time the war in the Pacic came engine compartment was moved in the rear area of the
to an end.* [3] chassis. It also was to use a 105 mm cannon as its main
armament.* [14]
The single prototype Type 5 was seized by American
forces during the occupation of Japan and earmarked for
tests at the Aberdeen Proving Grounds.* [10] However, its
subsequent fate is unknown. 7.5 Notes
[1] Tomczyk 2005, p. 30.
7.4 Variants
[2] Chi-Ri - Imperial Japan's most advanced tank
7.6 References
Experimental 105 mm tank gun
Type 97 Chi-Ha
48
8.4. PRODUCTION 49
1940: 315
8.3.1 Development of the improved Shin-
hoto Chi-Ha 1941: 507
Total production of the 57 mm & 47 mm gun Type 97 able success, as the ill-equipped National Revolution-
medium tanks was 2,092. Although production peaked ary Army of the Republic of China forces were lim-
in 1943 it was the last year any Type 97 was produced, as ited to only three tank battalions consisting of British
factories switched to the new tank designs, most notably exports of the Vickers, German Panzer Is, and Italian
the Type 1 Chi-He.* [17] CV33 tankettes.* [24] However, its rst real test in com-
bat against opposing armor came with the Battles of
Khalkhin Gol in July 1939 against the Soviet Union. The
8.5 Further development IJA 1st Tank Groups consisting of the 3rd and 4th Tank
Regiments (Yasuoka Detachment) had been assigned to
the Nomonhan region, under the command of Lt. Gen-
eral Yasuoka Masaomi.* [25] Of the two regiments, only
the 3rd Tank Regiment had been supplemented with 4
of the new Type 97 medium tanks, of which one was
selected as the regimental commander's tank during the
Battles of Khalkhin Gol. During erce ghting against
the Red Army, in which the 3rd Tank Regiment was as-
saulting an objective ringed with strung coiled wire (pi-
ano wire),* [26] the regimental commander, LTC Yoshi-
maru Kiyotake's Type 97 tank had become entangled up
to its drive sprockets. Struggling to extract itself from
the tank trap, LTC Yoshimaru managed to move his tank
only about 40 yards rearward, when his machine became
stopped completely.* [27] Now exposed to Soviet defen-
Type 3 Chi-Nu sive positions, Yoshimaru's Type 97 was subjected to the
re of a dozen Soviet BT-7 tanks and anti-tank guns.* [27]
The last design that based directly on Type 97 lineage was Soviet shells struck the tank's drive gear, hull, and the en-
the Type 3 Chi-Nu medium tank with a 75 mm main gun gine area, causing the vehicle to erupt into ames. When
of which 144 were built from 1944 to 1945.* [18] The the re reached the tank ammunition, the tank exploded,
Type 3 Chi-Nu retained the same chassis and suspension tearing o the turret and throwing it several feet away
of the Type 97 based Type 1 Chi-He tank, but with from the hull.* [28] Only the tank's gunner survived un-
a large new hexagonal gun turret and a commander's wounded, abandoning the tank prior to the explosion.
cupola.* [19] The Type 4 Chi-To was a separate design, The 3rd Tank Regimental commander's body was recov-
the last Japanese medium tank design to be completed ered after the battle.* [29]
during the war, considered equivalent* [20] to the Ger-
man Panther tank, but with only two vehicles completed
by war's end. By the time, the Japanese industry had been 8.6.2 World War II and beyond
badly crippled by the American bombing campaign; as a
result, few of these newer vehicles were ever built.
The IJA's need to supplement their tank units with ar-
tillery led to a need for self-propelled guns (SPGs). Sub-
sequently, the Type 97 chassis was utilized to manufac-
ture nearly a hundred SPGs, consisting primarily of 75
mm guns.* [21] Since the IJA's 1930's era tanks didn't
have the repower to penetrate the 1940s generation of
Allied armor, a need for tank destroyers arose, and exper-
iments ranging from 47 mm to 120 mm guns were con-
ducted.* [22] However, due to naval priorities, raw mate-
rials for any IJA production were limited.* [23]
Main article: List of Type 97 Chi-Ha variants List of Japanese armoured ghting vehicles of
World War II
52 CHAPTER 8. TYPE 97 CHI-HA
[6] History of War: Type 97 Chi-Ha Tank Foss, Christopher (2003). Great Book of Tanks: The
World's Most Important Tanks from World War I to
[7] Zaloga 2007, p. 8. the Present Day. Zenith Press. ISBN 0-7603-1475-
[8] Zaloga 2007, pp. 11, 12.
6.
[9] World War II vehicles website Foss, Christopher (2003). Tanks: The 500. Crest-
line. ISBN 0-7603-1500-0.
[10] Taki's Imperial Japanese Army: THE DEVELOP-
MENT OF IMPERIAL JAPANESE TANKS: Shin- Gander, Terry J. (1995). Jane's Tanks of World War
hoto Chi-Ha II. Harper Collins. ISBN 0-00-470847-4
[11] Tomczyk 2007, pp. 7, 8. Tomczyk, Andrzej (2007) [2002]. Japanese Armor
Vol. 2. AJ Press. ISBN 978-8372371119.
[12] Tomczyk 2007, pp. 19, 24.
[17] Zaloga 2007, pp. 10, 17, 2021. 8.13 External links
[18] Zaloga 2007, pp. 17, 21.
Imperial Japanese Army Page - Akira Takizawa
[19] Tomczyk 2005, p. 3.
The Most Eective Jap Tank- Intelligence Bul-
[20] Zaloga 2007, p. 22.
letin, July 1945
[21] Zaloga 2007, pp. 17, 19.
History of War.org
[22] Zaloga 2007, pp. 19, 20.
Type 4 Chi-To
53
54 CHAPTER 9. TYPE 4 CHI-TO
9.4 Notes
[1] Tomczyk 2005, p. 30.
9.8.2 Images
File:1st-IJA-Tank-Division,-night-practice-shooting.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/
1st-IJA-Tank-Division%2C-night-practice-shooting.jpg License: Public domain Contributors: https://www.flickr.com/photos/
dani1944/3526936918/in/photostream/ Original artist: Imperial Japanese Army
File:95 .JPG Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/95%E5%BC%8F%E8%BB%BD%E6%88%
A6%E8%BB%8A%E3%83%91%E3%83%A9%E3%82%AA.JPG License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Contributors: Original artist:
File:AMISOM_T-55.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/53/AMISOM_T-55.jpg License:
Public domain Contributors: self-made, appearance taken from http://warisboring.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/
ugandan-tank-presidential-palace-mogadishu-nov1-25-2007small.jpg Original artist: Orlovic
File:Ambox_important.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/Ambox_important.svg License: Public do-
main Contributors: Own work, based o of Image:Ambox scales.svg Original artist: Dsmurat (talk contribs)
File:Amph_tank_(AWM_099057).jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/Amph_tank_%28AWM_
099057%29.jpg License: Public domain Contributors: This image is available from the Collection Database of the Australian War
Memorial under the ID Number: 099057
This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing for more information.
Original artist: Unknown<a href='//www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4233718' title='wikidata:Q4233718'><img alt='wikidata:Q4233718'
src='https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Wikidata-logo.svg/20px-Wikidata-logo.svg.png' width='20'
height='11' srcset='https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Wikidata-logo.svg/30px-Wikidata-logo.svg.png 1.5x,
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Wikidata-logo.svg/40px-Wikidata-logo.svg.png 2x' data-le-width='1050'
data-le-height='590' /></a>
File:Battle_of_Khalkhin_Gol-Japanese_Type_89_Chi-Ro_midium_tank.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/
commons/1/19/Battle_of_Khalkhin_Gol-Japanese_Type_89_Chi-Ro_midium_tank.jpg License: Public domain Contributors:
Contemporary Military Historian Original artist: Dmei Tsushin
File:Chi-Nu.JPG Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/Chi-Nu.JPG License: Public domain Contributors:
Andrzej M. Tomczyk Japonska bron pancerna. Gdansk: AJ Press, 2005. Vol.4 (TankPower 13). ISBN 8-37237-167-9 Orig-
inal artist: Unknown<a href='https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4233718' title='wikidata:Q4233718'><img alt='wikidata:Q4233718'
src='https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Wikidata-logo.svg/20px-Wikidata-logo.svg.png' width='20'
height='11' srcset='https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Wikidata-logo.svg/30px-Wikidata-logo.svg.png 1.5x,
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Wikidata-logo.svg/40px-Wikidata-logo.svg.png 2x' data-le-width='1050'
data-le-height='590' /></a>
File:Chi-Nu_2.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Chi-Nu_2.jpg License: Public domain Contributors:
Andrzej M. Tomczyk. Japoska bro pancerna Vol. 4. AJ Press, 2005 (TankPower 12). ISBN 8-37237-167-9 Original artist: ?
File:Chi-Nu_4th_Tank_Division.JPG Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9f/Chi-Nu_4th_Tank_Division.
JPG License: Public domain Contributors: Andrzej M. Tomczyk Japoska bro pancerna Vol. 4. AJ Press, 2005 (TankPower 12).
ISBN 8-37237-167-9 Original artist: ?
File:Chi-Nu_assembly_1.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/80/Chi-Nu_assembly_1.jpg License: Public
domain Contributors: Andrzej M. Tomczyk. Japoska bro pancerna Vol. 4. AJ Press, 2005 (TankPower 12). ISBN 8-37237-167-9
Original artist: ?
File:Chi-Nu_production_line.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Chi-Nu_production_line.jpg Li-
cense: Public domain Contributors: Andrzej M. Tomczyk Japoska bro pancerna Vol. 4. AJ Press, 2005 (TankPower 12).
ISBN 8-37237-167-9 Original artist: ?
File:Chi-Nu_transmission.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3d/Chi-Nu_transmission.jpg License: Pub-
lic domain Contributors: Andrzej M. Tomczyk. Japoska bro pancerna Vol. 4. AJ Press, 2005 (TankPower 12). ISBN 8-37237-
167-9 Original artist: ?
File:Chi-Ri.JPG Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/75/Chi-Ri.JPG License: Public domain Contributors: ?
Original artist: ?
File:Chi-To.JPG Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7d/Chi-To.JPG License: Public domain Contributors: ?
Original artist: ?
File:Commons-logo.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4a/Commons-logo.svg License: PD Contributors: ? Origi-
nal artist: ?
File:Experimental_Type_5_gun_tank_Ho-Ri_mock-up_scale_model_01.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/
commons/a/ad/Experimental_Type_5_gun_tank_Ho-Ri_mock-up_scale_model_01.jpg License: Public domain Contributors: Tomio
Hara, Akira Takeuchi Nihon no sensha Japanese tanks)" p165, Shuppan Kyodosha, 1978. Original artist: Imperial Japanese Army
File:Experimental_Type_91_Heavy_Tank_01.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Experimental_
Type_91_Heavy_Tank_01.jpg License: Public domain Contributors: Tomio Hara, Akira Takeuchi Nihon no sensha Japanese tanks)"
p143, Shuppan Kyodosha, 1978. Original artist: Imperial Japanese Army
9.8. TEXT AND IMAGE SOURCES, CONTRIBUTORS, AND LICENSES 57
This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing for more information.
Original artist: photographer not identied
File:Type_95_Ha-Go.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Type_95_Ha-Go.jpg License: Public domain
Contributors: This image is available from the Collection Database of the Australian War Memorial under the ID Number: 011299
This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing for more information.
Original artist: The original uploader was Wolcott at English Wikipedia
File:Type_95_Ha-Go_tank_Malaya_AWM_011298.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/Type_95_
Ha-Go_tank_Malaya_AWM_011298.jpg License: Public domain Contributors: This image is available from the Collection Database of
the Australian War Memorial under the ID Number: 011298
This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing for more information.
Original artist: photographer not identied
File:Type_95_Ha_Go_tank_under_restoration_in_Sept_2012.JPG Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/25/
Type_95_Ha_Go_tank_under_restoration_in_Sept_2012.JPG License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Contributors:
Olympus E-PL3
Original artist: Nick-D
File:Type_95_Tank_Lampang_Thailand_016.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c6/Type_95_Tank_
Lampang_Thailand_016.jpg License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Contributors: Own work Original artist: Z3144228
File:Type_95_light_tank_Ha-Go_early_model.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Type_95_light_
tank_Ha-Go_early_model.jpg License: Public domain Contributors: Jiro Sayama Kiko nyumon : kikaika butai tettei kenkyup214,
Kojinsha, 2002. Original artist: Unknown<a href='//www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4233718' title='wikidata:Q4233718'><img alt='wikidata:
Q4233718' src='https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Wikidata-logo.svg/20px-Wikidata-logo.svg.png'
width='20' height='11' srcset='https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Wikidata-logo.svg/30px-Wikidata-logo.
svg.png 1.5x, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Wikidata-logo.svg/40px-Wikidata-logo.svg.png 2x'
data-le-width='1050' data-le-height='590' /></a>
File:Type_95_top_rear_3-4_view.JPG Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/Type_95_top_rear_3-4_view.
JPG License: CC BY-SA 2.5 Contributors: No machine-readable source provided. Own work assumed (based on copyright claims). Original
artist: No machine-readable author provided. Makthorpe assumed (based on copyright claims).
File:Type_97_(AWM_P00001-361).jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/Type_97_%28AWM_
P00001-361%29.jpg License: Public domain Contributors: This image is available from the Collection Database of the Australian War
Memorial under the ID Number: P00001.361
This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing for more information.
Original artist: ?
60 CHAPTER 9. TYPE 4 CHI-TO