Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Short-Term Fluconazole Therapy For The Treatment of Candiduria in ICU and ICU Step-Down Patients
Short-Term Fluconazole Therapy For The Treatment of Candiduria in ICU and ICU Step-Down Patients
Short-Term Fluconazole Therapy For The Treatment of Candiduria in ICU and ICU Step-Down Patients
OBJECTIVE: Candiduria is very common in critically ill patients. It is often benign; however, it can develop into a serious systemic infection and treatment
is suggested in symptomatic critically ill patients. The optimal duration of therapy is unclear. Long-term therapy (14 days) is recommended by the current
guidelines, but previous data suggest that shorter-duration therapy may be effective. Minimizing the use of antifungal agents is desirable to avoid fungal
resistance and adverse events. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of short-term treatment of candiduria.
METHODS: This was an observational study in medical, surgical, and trauma intensive care unit (ICU) and ICU step-down patients. A pathway utilizing a 3-
day course of fluconazole for candiduria was implemented. The candiduria recurrence rate was compared in patients treated before (control groups with short-
# $ #
term, ie, 3 days, or longterm, ie, 7 days, therapy) and after the implementation of the pathway (study group: 3 days).
RESULTS: Thirty-seven study patients were compared to 59 control patients. There were statistically no differences in the recurrence rate for candiduria
.
among study patients, control patients with long-term therapy, and control patients with short-term therapy (32% vs 55% vs 38%, respectively; P 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Three days of fluconazole treatment for candiduria appeared to be as effective as long-term therapy in this population. KEYWORDS:
urinary tract infections, antifungals, fungal infections, critical care, health care-associated infections
CITATION: Wood et al. short-term Fluconazole therapy for the treatment of Candiduria in COPYRIGHT: the authors, publisher and licensee libertas academica limited. this is
iCu and iCu step-down Patients. Clinical Medicine Insights: Trauma and Intensive Medicine an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY-nC
2015:6 1923 doi:10.4137/CMtiM.s20140. 3.0 license.
RECEIVED: september 17, 2014. RESUBMITTED: January 15, 2015. ACCEPTED FOR CORRESPONDENCE: cwood@uthsc.edu
PUBLICATION: January 17, 2015.
Paper subject to independent expert blind peer review by minimum of two reviewers. all
ACADEMIC EDITOR: Chuanju liu, editor in Chief editorial decisions made by independent academic editor. upon submission manuscript
was subject to anti-plagiarism scanning. Prior to publication all authors have given
TYPE: Original research signed confirmation of agreement to article publication and compliance with all
FUNDING: this study was funded by a Pharmacy resident health services research grant applicable ethical and legal requirements, including the accuracy of author and
from the american society of health-system Pharmacists and was carried out at the contributor information, disclosure of competing interests and funding sources,
Regional Medical Center, Memphis, TN, USA The authors confirm that the funder had no compliance with ethical requirements relating to human and animal study participants,
influence over the study design, content of the article, or selection of this journal. and compliance with any copyright requirements of third parties. this journal is a member
of the Committee on Publication ethics (COPe).
COMPETING INTERESTS: Ka and Clr were PgY2 critical care residents and MC was a
PgY1 resident at the regional Medical Center, Memphis, tn. none of the other authors have Published by libertas academica. learn more about this journal.
a conflict of interest to report.
&OLQLFDOVXVSLFLRQRIFDQGLGXULD
2 EWDLQXULQHFXOW
XUH
3 UHVHQFHRI
FIXP/ 12
1 RWUHDWPH
RI &DQGLGD
VS" QW
<(6
) LUVWHSLVRG 12 8 VHQRQIOXFRQD]ROH
RIFDQGLGXULD"
H HPSLULFWKHUDS\
<(6
5 HPRYHFKDQJHXULQDU\
EODGGHUFDWKHWHULISUHV
HQW
%HJLQ)OXFRQD]ROH
PJ,932GDLO\ GD\V
(n = 37)
SHORT TERM (n = 37) LONG TERM (n = 22)
Sex, no. (%)
Candida .100,000 cfu/ml in urine culture, no. (%) 32 (86) 15 (68) 30 (81)
Notes: Compared to study group, P = 0.013; compared to study group, P = 0.0016. All other comparisons not statistically significant.
a b
Wood et al
(n = 37)
SHORT TERM (n = 37) LONG TERM (n = 22)
Recurrence of candiduria, no. (%) 14/37 (38) 12/22 (55) 12/37 (32)
Med/surg iCu 43 32 52 38 49 49
or fluconazole 200 mg/day for 7 days. The eradication candiduria go on to develop candidiasis. 24 This view seems to rates were
similar among the groups (77%, 75%, and 79%, be corroborated by the IDSA guidelines. 10
.
respectively; P 0.05).9 In addition, two nonrandomized This study has three primary strengths. First, this study is observational
studies showed that short-term treatment with unique because it compared short- and long-term fluconazole
ABBI for 35 days was 80%100% effective (total n = 126).12 for treating candiduria. Second, the candiduria recurrence
Two other trials studied longer durations of flucon- rates in the study group were in the range of those reported azole. 10,11 Sobel
et al10 randomized 316 patients to fluconazole in other studies. Third, this study included both trauma and 200 mg/day for 14 days
or catheter replacement alone. Fluco- medical ICU patients. Thus, the data should be applicable to a nazole resulted in superior
,
eradication at 14 days (50% vs 29%, wide variety of patient groups. respectively; P 0.001), but not at 1 month (61% vs 56%, This
.
study also has several limitations. First, the sample respectively; P 0.05). Similarly, Potasman et al11 random- size was relatively
small and thus there is a potential for a Type II ized 60 patients to receive fluconazole for 14 days or catheter statistical error in the
primary outcome. Second, this was not replacement alone. Again, fluconazole resulted in a more rapid a randomized trial, but it
rather used a before/after design. clearance of candiduria, but the eradiation rates were similar Obviously, larger randomized studies
are needed to validate between the groups after 8 weeks (87% vs 93%, respectively; or refute these findings. However, the control
and study
.
P 0.05).11 time periods were consecutive and we do not feel that there
REFERENCES
1. Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J, et al; National Healthcare Safety Network Team,
Participating National Healthcare Safety Network Facilities. Antimicrobial- resistant
pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data
reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, 20062007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:9961011.
Short-term fluconazole for Candiduria
2. Kauffman CA, Vazquez JA, Sobel JD, et al. Prospective multicenter surveillance
study of funguria in hospitalized patients. The National Institute for Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Mycoses Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30: 1418.
3. Nassoura Z, Ivatury RR, Simon RJ, Jabbour N, Stahl WM. Candiduria as an early
marker of disseminated infection in critically ill patients: the role of fluconazole
therapy. J Trauma. 1993;39:390394.
4. Bougnoux ME, Kac G, Aegerter P, dEnfert C, Fagon JY; CandiRea Study Group.
Candidemia and candiduria in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units in