Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

REVIEW ARTICLE

published: 24 November 2009


HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.053.2009

Cannabis use and cognition in schizophrenia


Else-Marie Lberg1,2* and Kenneth Hugdahl 1,2
1
Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
2
Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

Edited by: People with schizophrenia frequently report cannabis use, and cannabis may be a risk factor
Vince D. Calhoun, University of
for schizophrenia, mediated through effects on brain function and biochemistry. Thus, it is
New Mexico, USA
conceivable that cannabis may also influence cognitive functioning in this patient group. We
Reviewed by:
Francesca Filbey, The Mind Research report data from our own laboratory on the use of cannabis by schizophrenia patients, and
Network, USA review the existing literature on the effects of cannabis on cognition in schizophrenia and
Vince D. Calhoun, University of related psychosis. Of the 23 studies that were found, 14 reported that the cannabis users had
New Mexico, USA
better cognitive performance than the schizophrenia non-users. Eight studies reported no or
*Correspondence:
minimal differences in cognitive performance in the two groups, but only one study reported
Else-Marie Lberg, Division of
Psychiatry, Helse-Bergen HF, better cognitive performance in the schizophrenia non-user group. Our own results confirm the
Haukeland University Hospital, overall impression from the literature review of better cognitive performance in the cannabis
Forskningsenheten, Bergen Mental user group. These paradoxical findings may have several explanations, which are discussed.
Health Research Center, 5045 Bergen,
We suggest that cannabis causes a transient cognitive breakdown enabling the development
Norway.
e-mail: else.marie.loeberg@psych.uib.no of psychosis, imitating the typical cognitive vulnerability seen in schizophrenia. This is further
supported by an earlier age of onset and fewer neurological soft signs in the cannabis-related
schizophrenia group, suggesting an alternative pathway to psychosis.
Keywords: schizophrenia, psychosis, cannabis, neurocognition, substance abuse, neuropsychological functioning,
illegal drugs

INTRODUCTION several large-scale longitudinal studies have reported a relation-


A history of cannabis use is more common in schizophrenia than in ship between cannabis use in adolescence and later symptoms
the normal population (Regier et al., 1990; Arseneault et al., 2004b; of psychosis in the normal population (Tien and Anthony, 1990;
Barnes et al., 2006). Life-time cannabis use has been reported to be Arseneault et al., 2002; van Os et al., 2002; Fergusson et al., 2003;
as high as 64.4% in patients with schizophrenia (Barnes et al., 2006), Stefanis et al., 2004; Ferdinand et al., 2005; Henquet et al., 2005a).
and Lberg et al. (2003) found that 45% of schizophrenia patients In one study, cannabis use at age 18 and 21 led to 3.7 and 2.3 higher
participating in research studies had a history of previous cannabis rates of psychotic symptoms, respectively (Fergusson et al., 2003).
use. Since cannabis may be a risk factor for schizophrenia, mediated The relationship between cannabis and schizophrenia seems fairly
through changes in brain functioning and biochemistry, cannabis specific to schizophrenia, as compared to other mental disorders
may also have an effect on cognitive functioning in this patients (Chambers et al., 2001; Degenhardt et al., 2007; Di Forti et al.,
group. In a preliminary study in our laboratory we were struck 2007; Moore et al., 2007), and cannot be explained by potentially
by apparent paradoxical positive effects of cannabis on cognition confounding factors, like premorbid disorders, drug use, intoxica-
in patients with schizophrenia (Lberg et al., 2003, 2008). These tion, personality traits, sosiodemographic markers and intellec-
preliminary findings prompted a review of the existing literature on tual ability (Smit et al., 2004; Moore et al., 2007). Accordingly, five
the relationship between cannabis use and cognitive functioning in recent reviews concluded with an increased risk for schizophrenia
schizophrenia. For this purpose, we found 23 studies (see Table 1) and psychosis in individuals who have used cannabis (Arseneault
that have looked at the relationship between cannabis use and cog- et al., 2004b; Macleod et al., 2004; Smit et al., 2004; Henquet et al.,
nitive impairments in schizophrenia. The results from the review 2005b; Semple et al., 2005; Moore et al., 2007).
are discussed and possible explanations suggested. An alternative explanation is what can be called reversed
causality, namely that schizophrenia patients use cannabis as a
CANNABIS USE A RISK FACTOR FOR SCHIZOPHRENIA? form of self-medication, although existing data does not seem
Longitudinal studies have reported an increased risk for schizo- to support this hypothesis (Chambers et al., 2001). An impor-
phrenia and other psychoses after cannabis use. In two large- tant argument against reversed causality is an order-effect; i.e.
scale Swedish studies, the same cohort of about 50 000 military cannabis use seems to occur before the outbreak of psychosis,
conscripts were for followed longitudinally over 15 and 26 years. and not the other way around (Linszen et al., 1994; Degenhardt
Dose-dependent relationships were found between cannabis use at et al., 2007; Corcoran et al., 2008). Furthermore, in contrast to a
18 years of age and a later diagnosis of schizophrenia (Andreasson self-medication hypothesis, the psychoactive substance in can-
et al., 1987; Zammit et al., 2002). Cannabis have also been shown nabis, delta-(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), increases, and not
to increase the rate of conversion to psychosis in individuals at risk decreases, anxiety (Fusar-Poli et al., 2009; Morrison et al., 2009).
for psychosis (Kristensen and Cadenhead, 2007). Furthermore, Several studies have also shown that THC increases symptoms

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org November 2009 | Volume 3 | Article 53 | 1


Lberg and Hugdahl Cannabis and schizophrenia cognition

Table 1 | Overview of 23 studies on the effects of cannabis/drug use in schizophrenia and related psychoses on cognition by n, drug type,
diagnoses, type of drug use, and results.

n: drug group/no- Multiple drugs Diagnostic characteristics Current or former Cognitive results: Reference
drug group or cannabis drug use, SUD if drug group versus
diagnosed no-drug group

33/33 (13 in no-drug Multiple drugs Schizophrenia (outpatients) Current (SUD) No difference Addington and
group had former Addington (1997)
drug use)
110/42 Multiple drugs Schizophrenia + schizophreniform Both No difference Barnes et al. (2006)
22 (moderate); 16 Multiple drugs Schizophrenia Former No difference Cleghorn et al. (1991)
(severe)/25
18/59 Cannabis Non-affective Current (SUD) Minimal difference Liraud and Verdoux (2002)
psychoses + mood disorder
128/138 Multiple drugs First episode psychoses Current (SUD) No difference Pencer and Addington (2003)
14/13 Cannabis Schizophrenia + schizoaffective Current (SUD) No difference Sevy et al. (2007)
21/23 Multiple drugs Schizophrenia + schizoaffective Current Minimal difference Wobrock et al. (2007)
(recent onset)
27/23 Multiple drugs Schizophrenia (paranoid type) Current (SUD) Minimal difference Thoma and Daum (2008)
15 (current); 26 Multiple drugs Psychiatric outpatients Both (SUD) Better in both drug Carey et al. (2003)
(former)/15 groups
44/15 Cannabis Schizophrenia + schizoaffective Both Better in drug group Coulston et al. (2007a)
46/43 Multiple drugs Schizophrenia (inpatients) Current (SUD) Better in drug group Herman (2004)
19/20 Cannabis Schizophrenia Former Better in drug group Jockers-Scherubl et al. (2007)
16/14 Multiple drugs Schizophrenia (men only) Current (SUD) Better in drug group Joyal et al. (2003)
12/16 Cannabis schizophrenia + schizoaffective Former Better in drug group Kumra et al. (2005)
(adolescent)
13/13 Cannabis Acute psychoses Current More improved in drug Lberg et al. (2008)
group
13/16 Cannabis Schizophrenia Former Better in drug group Lberg et al. (2003)
57 (mild); 35 Multiple drugs First episode psychoses Current Better in both drug McCleery et al. (2006)
(severe)/91 (severe = SUD) groups
44/32 Multiple drugs Schizophrenia + schizoaffective Current (SUD) Better in drug group Potvin et al. (2005)
35/34 Cannabis Schizophrenia + schizoaffective Former (SUD) Better in drug group Schnell et al. (2009)
27/91 Multiple drugs Schizophrenia + schizoaffective Both (SUD) Better in drug group Sevy et al. (2001)
26/37 Cannabis First episode psychoses Both Better in drug group Stirling et al. (2005)
27/23 Multiple drugs Schizophrenia Current (SUD) Better in drug group Thoma et al. (2007)
61/71 Cannabis Non-affective psychoses Former Better in no-drug group Mata et al. (2008)

of psychosis and cognitive impairments (DSouza et al., 2005; (2004) found that subjects with established vulnerability for psycho-
Morrison et al., 2009), with a possible increased sensitivity in ses showed a stronger risk of follow-up psychosis after cannabis use
schizophrenia to the adverse effects of THC (DSouza et al., 2004). than individuals without such vulnerability. The relationship between
Moreover, cannabis has been shown to have clinical significance. cannabis use and psychosis may also be genetically mediated. In a lon-
Cannabis use in schizophrenia can lead to worsened illness prog- gitudinal study of 803 individuals, an interaction between the Val allele
noses; worsened clinical outcome, longer psychotic episodes, more of the Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene and adolescent
relapse and re-hospitalizations, poorer social functioning, more cannabis use significantly increased the likelihood of exhibiting psy-
frequent relapses, poorer compliance, and increased treatment chotic symptoms and the development of schizophreniform disorders
needs (Linszen et al., 1994; Caspari, 1999; Grech et al., 2005). Thus, (Caspi et al., 2005). In accordance with this, an interaction between
taken together, the available data seem to point to cannabis use as the COMT Val allele and sensitivity for psychosis and cognitive effects
increasing psychotic symptoms, and increasing the vulnerability of the psychoactive substance in cannabis has been found in individu-
for a psychotic outbreak. For example, Moore and colleagues have als with psychosis and their relatives (Henquet et al., 2006, 2009).
argued that we now know enough to warn young people about the
risk for psychosis after cannabis use (Moore et al., 2007). CANNABIS AND BRAIN FUNCTION
However, most individuals do not develop schizophrenia after The relationship between cannabis and schizophrenia may be
cannabis use, suggesting that a heightened risk for a development attributed to effects of cannabis on brain functioning and bio-
of psychosis must be related to other vulnerability factors. Verdoux chemistry. The endogenous cannabinoid system may directly or

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org November 2009 | Volume 3 | Article 53 | 2


Lberg and Hugdahl Cannabis and schizophrenia cognition

indirectly be involved in the development of the effects of cannabis group. The aim of the present review was therefore to examine
on symptoms of psychosis and cognition (Solowij and Michie, the relationship between cannabis use and cognitive functioning
2007). THC affects cannabinoid receptors, which are distributed in schizophrenia.
with high density in the cerebral cortex, including brain regions
implicated in schizophrenia (DSouza et al., 2005). The endog- COGNITION IN PATIENTS WHO USE CANNABIS A PARADOX
enous cannabinoid system interacts with the dopaminergic system Cognitive impairment is now universally recognized as a core feature
of the brain, and THC influence dopamine synthesis and uptake of schizophrenia, and clinically relevant cognitive impairments are
(DSouza et al., 2005). Abnormalities of the endogenous cannabi- observed in a majority of patients with schizophrenia (Green, 1996;
noid system in schizophrenia, not caused by cannabis use, have also Palmer et al., 1997, 2009). Cognitive impairment is often observed
been reported. Increased levels of endogenous cannabinoids have before the development of psychosis and in close relatives, and cog-
been found in the frontal cortex (Dean et al., 2001), in addition to nitive symptoms may also reside after clinical symptoms have been
elevated levels of endogenous cannabinoids in the cerebral spinal reduced or are no longer seen (Neuchterlein et al., 1994; Weinberger,
fluids (Leweke et al., 1999). 1995; Heaton et al., 2001; Gschwandtner et al., 2003), Thus, it is
A stronger relationship between adolescent cannabis use and clear that eventual effects of cannabis use on cognitive functioning
psychosis or schizophrenia, as compared to adult use, has been in schizophrenia would be of both theoretical value for the under-
reported in several studies (Caspi et al., 2005; Konings et al., 2008). standing of the disorder, and of clinical relevance for the diagnosis
Even though some of these findings can be explained by an increased and treatment of the disorder. Intuitively, a worsened outcome on
cumulative exposure to cannabis with earlier onset of cannabis use, cognitive functioning would be expected after cannabis use, since
it may also suggest that a developing brain is more vulnerable to cannabis has negative effects on psychosis in general, and from find-
the effects of cannabis than a matured brain. ings that cannabis use impairs illness prognosis (Linszen et al., 1994;
However although there seems to be ample evidence for Caspari, 1999; Grech et al., 2005), in addition to the adverse effects
the influence of cannabis on the development and outbreak of cannabis on brain functioning (DSouza et al., 2004).
of psychosis or schizophrenia (Moore et al., 2007), possibly For this purpose we reanalyzed previously collected data in our
mediated by adverse effects on brain functioning acting on the laboratory on cognitive performance in schizophrenia patients,
dopaminergic system (DSouza et al., 2005), much less is known including cannabis use as an explanatory variable (data from Lberg
regarding the effects of cannabis use on cognitive functioning in et al., 2003, 2008). Information on the history of cannabis use was
schizophrenia. If cannabis influences schizophrenia neurodevel- based on the patients clinical records and therapist questionnaires,
opment and brain functioning, it could be expected that can- and was further validated through SCID-interviews. Surprisingly,
nabis use may impact on cognitive functioning in this patients we found that patients with schizophrenia who had a history of

55

50
Cannabis group

45
Mean t-score

No cannabis group
40

35

30

25
General abilities Attention/working mem. Psychomotor speed
Learning/memory Executive functions

FIGURE 1 | Mean T-scores for the cannabis and no-cannabis group for the Complex Figure Test. Attention/working mem. = attention/working memory =
five cognitive functions. General abilities = general verbal and visuospatial Digit Vigilance Test, Calcap Continuous Performance Test (CPT), Trail Making Test
abilities = WAIS (Information, Vocabulary, Block Design), Verbal Fluency (FAS), B. Execute functions = Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Stroop Test.
Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Psychomotor speed = Trail Making Test A, Grooved Pegboard Test,
Learning/memory = California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) II, Rey-Osterrieth Fingertapping Test.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org November 2009 | Volume 3 | Article 53 | 3


Lberg and Hugdahl Cannabis and schizophrenia cognition

cannabis use scored significantly above their fellow counterparts with and without cannabis use (alone or in combination with
without a history of cannabis use (see Figure 1). This was found other substances) on cognitive performance (see Table 1 for
for almost all cognitive functions investigated, such as general intel- further details).
lectual ability, executive functions, attention, working memory and Fourteen of the studies listed in Table 1 reported that the
psychomotor speed. These results did not change when other illegal cannabis groups showed better cognitive performance than the
drugs where controlled for, and there were no differences in the two no-cannabis groups (Sevy et al., 2001; Carey et al., 2003; Joyal
groups with regard to clinical variables (Lberg et al., 2003). et al., 2003; Lberg et al., 2003, 2008; Herman, 2004; Kumra
In a second, prospective, study of patients with acute psychosis et al., 2005; Potvin et al., 2005; Stirling et al., 2005; McCleery
we assessed cognitive function at admission to a psychiatric emer- et al., 2006; Coulston et al., 2007a; Jockers-Scherubl et al., 2007;
gency ward, after 6 weeks, and after 3 months. Information on the Thoma et al., 2007; Schnell et al., 2009). Eight of the studies in
history of cannabis use was based on patients clinical records and Table 1 reported no or minimal differences in cognitive per-
the Clinician Drug Use Scale (Drake et al., 1990), and was further formance in the two groups (Cleghorn et al., 1991; Addington
validated through urine samples. The patients with both cannabis and Addington, 1997; Liraud and Verdoux, 2002; Pencer and
use and psychosis showed a significantly larger improvement in Addington, 2003; Barnes et al., 2006; Sevy et al., 2007; Wobrock
their cognitive performance in the three months after admission, et al., 2007; Thoma and Daum, 2008), and one study reported
as compared to the psychotic patients with no cannabis use. Both better cognitive performance in the no-cannabis compared to
groups showed cognitive impairments at admission, but these were the drug group (Mata et al., 2008).
more prevalent in the non-cannabis psychosis group (see Figure 2; Most of the studies in Table 1 have small n, and may there-
Lberg et al., 2008). fore be influenced by Type-II statistical errors (false negatives),
underestimating group differences due to lack of power. For
COGNITION IN PATIENTS WHO USE CANNABIS A instance, Thoma and Daum (2008) suggested that this may have
LITERATURE REVIEW been a problem in their 2008 study, influencing their conclu-
The paradoxical results reported by Lberg et al. (2003, 2008) sion of no differences between the groups. Furthermore, some
seem to be consistent with several other studies on the rela- of the studies included diverse drug use in addition to cannabis
tionship between cognition, cannabis and/or illegal drugs and use, for instance alcohol and opiates in clusters of stimulating
schizophrenia (Joyal et al., 2003; Jockers-Scherubl et al., 2007). and/or hallucinatory illegal drugs. These drugs may have differ-
We performed a PubMed search on all combinations of the fol- ent, and sometimes opposite effects on brain functioning and
lowing search words: cannabis, substance, schizophr*, psychos*, neurochemistry, and consequently on cognition. In the overview
cognit* and neuropsych*, and searched the reference lists for all in Table 1, all studies included cannabis; as a high frequent drug
included papers of other studies covering this topic. This resulted together with other drugs used, or as the only drug used. Thus, no
in 23 studies comparing schizophrenia and related psychoses study was included that did not include cannabis. Previous drug

55

50

45
Mean t-score

No cannabis group
40

35
Cannabis group

30

25
At admission After 6 weeks After 3 months

FIGURE 2 | Mean neuropsychological T-scores for the cannabis and no-cannabis group at admission, after 6 weeks and 3 months.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org November 2009 | Volume 3 | Article 53 | 4


Lberg and Hugdahl Cannabis and schizophrenia cognition

use versus current drug use is included in Table 1 as a separate A second explanation could be that cannabis imitates the typi-
factor since this may have influenced the results. Current drug cal cognitive vulnerability seen in schizophrenia. The major psy-
use may influence cognition by means of persisting intoxication choactive component in cannabis, THC, creates transient negative
effects or more acute effects on brain functioning, thus creating a effects on cognitive functioning and psychotic symptoms (DSouza
false cognitive impairment not otherwise present. Furthermore, et al., 2005; Semple et al., 2005; Morrison et al., 2009). Cannabis
the use of diagnostic criteria is noted, yielding a SUD, since this use of sufficient magnitude, or in individuals particularly vulner-
usually means that the patients meet criteria for abuse or addic- able to the effects of cannabis, may lead to compromised brain
tive behavior, and that the drug use has negative consequences functioning, causing a breakdown of reality testing. In addition,
for everyday living. This may bias the drug groups to consist of adolescent cannabis use seems to cause an especially strong risk
quite heavy users due to the exclusion of patients without a SUD for later psychosis (Caspi et al., 2005; Konings et al., 2008), con-
diagnosis who nevertheless may have a frequent drug problem. sistent with a sensitive adolescent brain in the middle of impor-
An example of this is the study by Addington and Addington tant neurodevelopmental processes. Thus, cannabis would induce
(1997) where it was reported that the no-drug group actually more transient cognitive changes that mimic the typical cognitive
included 13 patients with previous drug use. Another problem vulnerability. These changes can cause psychosis for some indi-
when comparing the studies in Table 1 is the different diagnostic viduals, but will normally not cause the characteristic persistent
groups included in the studies, possibly with different levels of cognitive impairments seen in schizophrenia. Consistent with this,
cognitive vulnerability. fewer neurological soft signs have been shown in schizophrenia
Coulston et al. (2007b) did not find consistent neuropsycho- patients who also use cannabis (Bersani et al., 2002; Ruiz-Veguilla
logical patterns of cannabis use on cognition when examining et al., 2009). Stirling et al. (2005) also reported fewer neurologi-
seven studies (one of these studies reported intoxications effects, cal soft signs, and better cognitive functioning, in the drug group
though), and attributed this to methodological variability between after 1012 years, and suggested that the drug group followed a
and methodological limitations within the studies. Methodological different path to schizophrenia with less negative events of early
and clinical heterogeneity is also a problem in studies comparing brain development.
differences in brain structure and function between drug and no- Further support for the imitation of cognitive vulnerability
drug groups by means of brain-imaging methods, and inconsistent hypothesis is findings regarding age of onset of the disorder.
results have been reported (Quickfall and Crockford, 2006; Rais The development of schizophrenia is usually seen in late adoles-
et al., 2008; Wobrock et al., 2009). cence/early adulthood. This is in line with a neurodevelopmental
model (Weinberger, 1995), since the age of onset coincides with
CONCLUSION LITERATURE REVIEW the late maturation of the prefrontal cortex through pruning of
Table 1 show that a majority of the studies report better cogni- exuberant synapses and myelination of axons (Woo and Crowell,
tive functioning in the cannabis-related schizophrenia and psy- 2005). Studies have reported earlier age of onset in schizophrenia
chosis groups compared to non-drug groups. This conclusion patients who have used cannabis (Stirling et al., 2005; Barnes
is supported even when confounding factors, like age, years of et al., 2006). Consistent with this, data from our own laboratory
education, premorbid IQ, medical history, substance use, and showed four years earlier debut of schizophrenia in cannabis users
psychiatric symptoms (Coulston et al., 2007a) are controlled (Lberg et al., 2003). Again, this suggests a different pathway to
for. Likewise, Potvin et al. (2008) argued that most studies have schizophrenia, and is consistent with a hypothesis stating that
shown superior neuropsychological functioning in cannabis use cannabis is an environmental factor imitating the effect of the
and schizophrenia combined, then in schizophrenia patients alone typical cognitive vulnerability (Solowij and Michie, 2007).
(Potvin et al., 2008).
CONCLUDING REMARKS
EXPLANATIONS FOR THE PARADOXICAL EFFECT Cannabis seems to be a risk factor for the development of schizo-
The seemingly paradoxical cognitive findings in cannabis-related phrenia, mimicking the typical cognitive vulnerability. As an
schizophrenia could have several explanations. One explanation is environmental factor, cannabis use has the potential for being
that the group differences in cognition are attributed to superior influenced by interventions, thus indirectly having an effect on the
social skills in the cannabis schizophrenia groups, making them development of schizophrenia. Accordingly, clinical implications
skillful enough to get hold of illegal drugs. Superior social skills (Moore et al., 2007) and public health implications (Arseneault
are however not consistent with the finding of poorer prognosis in et al., 2004a) have been suggested. A promising clinical interven-
this group. Few studies have, however, examined this directly, and the tion would be to monitor cannabis use in patients known to be vul-
issue therefore remains unresolved. Two Norwegian studies reported nerable for psychosis, and help them to stay away from cannabis.
poorer premorbid functioning in psychosis patients who also abused Cannabis does not appear to create additive cognitive impairments,
illegal drugs (Ringen et al., 2008), and better premorbid social func- however, and cannabis-using patients may actually have better
tioning and poorer premorbid academic functioning in this group cognitive functioning. This could suggest that cannabis-related
(Larsen et al., 2006), respectively. It has also been suggested that the schizophrenia represents a different subtype, although few consist-
group differences could be caused by cannabis having a protective ent clinical differences in regard to symptom profiles have been
or positive influence on brain functioning (Coulston et al., 2007a). found (Boydell et al., 2007). This necessitates a better understand-
Based on the effects of cannabis on brain function and prognosis of ing of the paradox of better cognitive functioning, similar clinical
the psychosis, this is not supported by the existing data. profiles, and worse prognosis in this group, through for instance

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org November 2009 | Volume 3 | Article 53 | 5


Lberg and Hugdahl Cannabis and schizophrenia cognition

longitudinal studies on the effect of previous and ongoing cannabis psychosis, in spite of the absence of proper cognitive vulnerability.
use on the fluctuations of cognitive and clinical functioning in Thus, the effects of cannabis on cognition and brain functioning
schizophrenia. model the cognitive vulnerability in schizophrenia, and under-
Possibly cannabis mimics the typical cognitive vulnerability seen standing this cognitive breakdown may provide a unique window
in schizophrenia. Solowij and Michie (2007) suggested that can- to understanding schizophrenia neurodevelopment.
nabis leads to similar cognitive impairment as what is typically seen
in schizophrenia, but of a lower magnitude. Several studies have
shown cognitive impairment during THC-intoxication (DSouza ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
et al., 2005; Morrison et al., 2009). The preliminary data from our Financial support for the research reported in this article was given
own laboratory suggest more transient cognitive impairments in by Research Council of Norway (RCN), Haukeland University
the cannabis group (Lberg et al., 2008). Perhaps cannabis causes Hospital Strategic Research Programme, and Health Authority
a transient cognitive breakdown enabling the development of for Western Norway.

REFERENCES role functioning, and psychiatric sta- evaluation of methodological and vice versa. Addiction 100,
Addington, J., and Addington, D. (1997). tus. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 191, 300308. issues. Aust. N Z J. Psychiatry, 41, 612618.
Substance abuse and cognitive func- Caspari, D. (1999). Cannabis and schizo- 869884. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., and
tioning in schizophrenia. J. Psychiatry phrenia: results of a follow-up study. Dean, B., Sundram, S., Bradbury, R., Swain-Campbell,N.R.(2003). Cannabis
Neurosci. 22, 99104. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. Scarr, E., and Copolov, D. (2001). dependence and psychotic symptoms
Andreasson, S., Allebeck, P., Engstrom, 249, 4549. Studies on [3H]CP-55940 binding in in young people. Psychol. Med. 33,
A., and Rydberg, U. (1987). Cannabis Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Cannon, M., the human central nervous system: 1521.
and schizophrenia. A longitudinal McClay, J., Murray, R., Harrington, H., regional specific changes in density Fusar-Poli, P., Crippa, J. A., Bhattacharyya,
study of Swedish conscripts. Lancet Taylor, A., Arseneault, L., Williams, B., of cannabinoid-1 receptors associated S., Borgwardt, S. J., Allen, P., Martin-
2, 14831486. Braithwaite, A., Poulton, R., and Craig, with schizophrenia and cannabis use. Santos, R., Seal, M., Surguladze, S.
Arseneault, L., Cannon, M., Poulton, R., I. W. (2005). Moderation of the effect Neuroscience 103, 915. A., OCarrol, C., Atakan, Z., Zuardi,
Murray, R., Caspi, A., and Moffitt, T. of adolescent-onset cannabis use Degenhardt, L., Tennant, C., Gilmour, A. W., and McGuire, P. K. (2009).
E. (2002). Cannabis use in adolescence on adult psychosis by a functional S., Schofield, D., Nash, L., Hall, W., Distinct effects of {delta}9-tetrahy-
and risk for adult psychosis: longitu- polymorphism in the catechol-O- and McKay, D. (2007). The temporal drocannabinol and cannabidiol on
dinal prospective study. BMJ 325, methyltransferase gene: longitudinal dynamics of relationships between neural activation during emotional
12121213. evidence of a gene X environment cannabis, psychosis and depression processing. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 66,
Arseneault, L., Cannon, M., Witton, J., interaction. Biol. Psychiatry 57, among young adults with psychotic 95105.
and Murray, R. (2004a). Cannabis as 11171127. disorders: findings from a 10-month Grech, A., Van Os, J., Jones, P. B., Lewis,
a potential causal factor in schizophre- Chambers, R. A., Krystal, J. H., and Self, prospective study. Psychol. Med. 37, S. W., and Murray, R. M. (2005).
nia. In Marijuana and Madness, D. D. W. (2001). A neurobiological basis 927934. Cannabis use and outcome of recent
Castle and R. Murray, eds (Cambridge, for substance abuse comorbidity in Di Forti, M., Morrison, P. D., Butt, A., onset psychosis. Eur. Psychiatry 20,
Cambridge University Press), pp. schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 50, and Murray, R. M. (2007). Cannabis 349353.
101118. 7183. use and psychiatric and cogitive dis- Green, M. F. (1996). What are the func-
Arseneault, L., Cannon, M., Witton, J., and Cleghorn, J. M., Kaplan, R. D., Szechtman, orders: the chicken or the egg? Curr. tional consequences of neurocogni-
Murray, R. M. (2004b). Causal associa- B., Szechtman, H., Brown, G. M., and Opin. Psychiatry 20, 228234. tive deficits in schizophrenia? Am. J.
tion between cannabis and psychosis: Franco, S. (1991). Substance abuse and Drake, R. E., Osher, F. C., Noordsy, D. Psychiatry 153, 321330.
examination of the evidence. Br. J. schizophrenia: effect on symptoms L., Hurlbut, S. C., Teague, G. B., and Gschwandtner, U., Aston, J., Borgwardt,
Psychiatry 184, 110117. but not on neurocognitive function. Beaudett, M. S. (1990). Diagnosis of S., Drewe, M., Feinendegen, C.,
Barnes, T. R., Mutsatsa, S. H., Hutton, S. J. Clin. Psychiatry 52, 2630. alcohol use disorders in schizophrenia. Lacher, D., Lanzarone, A., Stieglitz,
B., Watt, H. C., and Joyce, E. M. (2006). Corcoran, C. M., Kimhy, D., Stanford, Schizophr. Bull. 16, 5767. R.-D., and Riecher-Rssler, A. (2003).
Comorbid substance use and age at A., Khan, S., Walsh, J., Thompson, DSouza, D. C., Abi-Saab, W. M., Neuropsychological and neurophysi-
onset of schizophrenia. Br. J. Psychiatry J., Schobel, S., Harkavy-Friedman, J., Madonick, S., Forselius-Bielen, K., ological findings in individuals sus-
188, 237242. Goetz, R., Colibazzi, T., Cressman, V., Doersch, A., Braley, G., Gueorguieva, pected to be at risk for schizophrenia:
Bersani, G., Orlandi, V., Gherardelli, S., and and Malaspina, D. (2008). Temporal R., Cooper, T. B., and Krystal, J. H. preliminary results from the Basel
Pancheri, P. (2002). Cannabis and neu- association of cannabis use with (2005). Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol early detection of psychosis study
rological soft signs in schizophrenia: symptoms in individuals at clinical effects in schizophrenia: implications Fruherkennung von Psychosen
absence of relationship and influence high risk for psychosis. Schizophr. Res. for cognition, psychosis, and addic- (FEPSY). Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 108,
on psychopathology. Psychopathology 106, 286293. tion. Biol. Psychiatry 57, 594608. 152155.
35, 289295. Coulston, C. M., Perdices, M., and DSouza, D. C., Cho, H.-S., Perry, E. B., Heaton, R. K., Gladsjo, J. A., Palmer, B.
Boydell, J., Dean, K., Dutta, R., Giouroukou, Tennant, C. C. (2007a). The neu- and Krystal, J. H. (2004). Cannabinoid W., Kuck, J., Marcotte, T. D., and Jeste,
E., Fearon, P., and Murray, R. (2007). ropsychological correlates of can- model psychosis, dopamine-canna- D. V. (2001). Stability and course of
A comparison of symptoms and fam- nabis use in schizophrenia: lifetime binoid interactions and implications neuropsychological deficits in schiz-
ily history in schizophrenia with and abuse/dependence, frequency of use, for schizophrenia. In Marijuana and ophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 58,
without prior cannabis use: implica- and recency of use. Schizophr. Res. 96, Madness, D. Castle and R. Murray, eds 2432.
tions for the concept of cannabis psy- 169184. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Henquet, C., Krabbendam, L., Spauwen, J.,
chosis. Schizophr. Res. 93, 203210. Coulston, C. M., Perdices, M., and Press), pp. 142165. Kaplan, C., Lieb, R., Wittchen, H. U., and
Carey, K. B., Carey, M. P., and Simons, Tennant, C. C. (2007b). The neu- Ferdinand, R. F., Sondeijker, F., van der van Os, J. (2005a). Prospective cohort
J. S. (2003). Correlates of substance ropsychological of cannabis and Ende, J., Selten, J. P., Huizink, A., and study of cannabis use, predisposition
use disorder among psychiatric other substance use in schizophrenia: Verhulst, F. C. (2005). Cannabis use for psychosis, and psychotic symptoms
outpatients: focus on cognition, social review of the literature and critical predicts future psychotic symptoms, in young people. BMJ 330, 11.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org November 2009 | Volume 3 | Article 53 | 6


Lberg and Hugdahl Cannabis and schizophrenia cognition

Henquet, C., Murray, R., Linszen, D., (1999). Elevated endogenous cannabi- Palmer, B. W., Dawes, S. E., and Heaton, Semple, D. M., McIntosh, A. M., and
and van Os, J. (2005b). The envi- noids in schizophrenia. Neuroreport R. K. (2009). What do we know Lawrie, S. M. (2005). Cannabis as
ronment and schizophrenia: the role 10, 16651669. about neuropsychological aspects of a risk factor for psychosis: system-
of cannabis use. Schizophr. Bull. 31, Linszen, D. H., Dingemans, P. M., and schizophrenia? Neuropsychol Rev, 19, atic review. J. Psychopharm. 19,
608612. Lenior, M. E. (1994). Cannabis 365384. 187194.
Henquet, C., Rosa, A., Delespaul, P., Papiol, abuse and the course of recent-onset Palmer, B. W., Heaton, R. K., Paulsen, J. Sevy, S., Burdick, K. E., Visweswaraiah, H.,
S., Fananas, L., van Os, J., and Myin- schizophrenic disorders. Arch. Gen. S., Kuck, J., Braff, D., Harris, M. J., Abdelmessih, S., Lukin, M., Yechiam,
Germeys, I. (2009). COMT ValMet Psychiatry 51, 273279. Zisook, S., and Jeste, D. V. (1997). E., and Bechara, A. (2007). Iowa
moderation of cannabis-induced Liraud, F., and Verdoux, H. (2002). Is it possible to be schizophrenic gambling task in schizophrenia: a
psychosis: a momentary assessment Effect of comorbid substance use on yet neuropsychologically normal? review and new data in patients with
study of switching on hallucinations neuropsychological performance in Neuropsychology 11, 437446. schizophrenia and co-occurring can-
in the flow of daily life. Acta Psychiatr. subjects with psychotic or mood dis- Pencer, A., and Addington, J. (2003). nabis use disorders. Schizophr. Res. 92,
Scand. 119, 156160. orders. Encephale 28, 160168. Substance use and cognition in early 7484.
Henquet, C., Rosa, A., Krabbendam, Lberg, E. M., Hugdahl, K., and psychosis. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 28, Sevy, S., Robinson, D. G., Holloway, S.,
L., Papiol, S., Fananas, L., Drukker, Jrgensen, H. A. (2008). Lower 4854. Alvir, J. M., Woerner, M. G., Bilder,
M., Ramaekers, J. G., and van Os, neurocognitive vulnerability in Potvin, S., Briand, C., Prouteau, A., R., Goldman, R., Lieberman, J., and
J. (2006). An experimental study schizophrenia with a history of can- Bouchard, R. H., Lipp, O., Lalonde, Kane, J. (2001). Correlates of substance
of catechol-o-methyltransferase nabis abuse? Abstract. Schizophr. Res., P., Nicole, L., Lesage, A., and Stip, E. misuse in patients with first-episode
Val158Met moderation of delta- 98(Suppl. S), 73. (2005). CANTAB explicit memory is schizophrenia and schizoaffective
9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced Lberg, E. M., Jrgensen, H. A., and less impaired in addicted schizophre- disorder. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 104,
effects on psychosis and cogni- Hugdahl, K. (2003). The effects of nia patients. Brain Cogn. 59, 3842. 367374.
tion. Neuropsychopharmacology 31, previous drug abuse on neurocogni- Potvin, S., Joyal, C. C., Pelletier, J., and Smit, F., Bolier, L., and Cuijpers, P.
27482757. tion in schizophrenia. Abstract. J. Int. Stip, E. (2008). Contradictory cog- (2004). Cannabis use and the risk
Herman, M. (2004). Neurocognitive Neuropsychol. Soc. 9, 172. nitive capacities among substance- of later schizophrenia: a review.
functioning and quality of life Macleod, J., Oakes, R., Copello, A., abusing patients with schizophrenia: Addiction 99, 425430.
among dually diagnosed and non- Crome, I., Egger, M., Hickman, M., a meta-analysis. Schizophr. Res. 100, Solowij, N., and Michie, P. T. (2007).
substance abusing schizophrenia Oppenkowski, T., Stokes-Lampard, 242251. Cannabis and cognitive dysfunction:
inpatients. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. H., and Davey Smith, G. (2004). Quickfall, J., and Crockford, D. (2006). parallels with endophenotypes of
13, 282291. Psychological and social sequelae of Brain neuroimaging in cannabis schizophrenia? J. Psychiatry Neurosci.
Jockers-Scherubl, M. C., Wolf, T., Radzei, cannabis and other illicit drug use by use: a review. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. 32, 3052.
N., Schlattmann, P., Rentzsch, J., young people: a systematic review of Neurosci. 18, 318332. Stefanis, N. C., Delespaul, P., Henquet, C.,
Gomez-Carrillo de Castro, A., and longitudinal, general population stud- Rais, M., Cahn, W., Van Haren, N., Bakoula, C., Stefanis, C. N., and Van
Kuhl, K. P. (2007). Cannabis induces ies. Lancet 363, 15791588. Schnack, H., Caspers, E., Hulshoff Os, J. (2004). Early adolescent canna-
different cognitive changes in Mata, I., Rodriguez-Sanchez, J. M., Pol, H., and Kahn, R. (2008). Excessive bis exposure and positive and negative
schizophrenic patients and in healthy Pelayo-Teran, J. M., Perez-Iglesias, R., brain volume loss over time in can- dimensions of psychosis. Addiction 99,
controls. Prog. Neuropsychopharm. Gonzalez-Blanch, C., Ramirez-Bonilla, nabis-using first-episode schizophre- 13331341.
Biol. Psychiatry 31, 10541063. M., Martinez-Garcia, O., Vazquez- nia patients. Am. J. Psychiatry 165, Stirling, J., Lewis, S., Hopkins, R., and
Joyal, C. C., Halle, P., Lapierre, D., and Barquero, J. L., and Crespo-Facorro, B. 490496. White, C. (2005). Cannabis use
Hodgins, S. (2003). Drug abuse and/ (2008). Cannabis abuse is associated Regier, D. A., Farmer, M. E., Rae, D. prior to first onset psychosis pre-
or dependence and better neuropsy- with decision-making impairment S., Locke, B. Z., Keith, S. J., Judd, dicts spared neurocognition at 10-
chological performance in patients among first-episode patients with L. L., and Goodwin, F. K. (1990). year follow-up. Schizophr. Res. 75,
with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. schizophrenia-spectrum psychosis. Comorbidity of mental disorders 135137.
63, 297299. Psychol. Med. 38, 12571266. with alcohol and other drug abuse. Thoma, P., and Daum, I. (2008). Working
Konings, M., Henquet, C., Maharajh, H. McCleery, A., Addington, J., and Results from the Epidemiologic memory and multi-tasking in para-
D., Hutchinson, G., and Van Os, J. Addington, D. (2006). Substance Catchment Area (ECA) Study. JAMA noid schizophrenia with and without
(2008). Early exposure to cannabis and misuse and cognitive functioning in 264, 25112518. comorbid substance use disorder.
risk for psychosis in young adolescents early psychosis: a 2 year follow-up. Ringen, P. A., Melle, I., Birkenaes, A. Addiction 103, 774786.
in Trinidad. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 118, Schizophr. Res. 88, 187191. B., Engh, J. A., Faerden, A., Vaskinn, Thoma, P., Wiebel, B., and Daum, I.
209213. Moore, T. H., Zammit, S., Lingford- A., Friis, S., Opjordsmoen, S., and (2007). Response inhibition and
Kristensen, K., and Cadenhead, K. S. Hughes, A., Barnes, T. R., Jones, P. Andreassen, O. A. (2008). The level of cognitive flexibility in schizophrenia
(2007). Cannabis abuse and risk for B., Burke, M., and Lewis, G. (2007). illicit drug use is related to symptoms with and without comorbid sub-
psychosis in a prodromal sample. Cannabis use and risk of psychotic and premorbid functioning in severe stance use disorder. Schizophr. Res.
Psychiatry Res 151, 151154. or affective mental health outcomes: mental illness. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 92, 168180.
Kumra, S., Thaden, E., DeThomas, C., a systematic review. Lancet 370, 118, 297304. Tien, A. Y., and Anthony, J. C. (1990).
and Kranzler, H. (2005). Correlates of 319328. Ruiz-Veguilla, M., Gurpegui, M., Epidemiological analysis of alco-
substance abuse in adolescents with Morrison, P. D., Zois, V., McKeown, D. Barrigon, M. L., Ferrin, M., Marin, hol and drug use as risk factors for
treatment-refractory schizophrenia A., Lee, T. D., Holt, D. W., Powell, J. F., E., Rubio, J. L., Gutierrez, B., Pintor, psychotic experiences. J. Nervous
and schizoaffective disorder. Schizophr. Kapur, S., and Murray, R. M. (2009). A., and Cervilla, J. (2009). Fewer Mental Disease 178, 473480.
Res. 73, 369371. The acute effects of synthetic intra- neurological soft signs among first van Os, J., Bak, M., Hanssen, M., Bijl, R. V.,
Larsen, T. K., Melle, I., Auestad, B., venous 9-tetrahydrocannabinol on episode psychosis patients with de Graaf, R., and Verdoux, H. (2002).
Friis, S., Haahr, U., Johannessen, psychosis, mood and cognitive func- heavy cannabis use. Schizophr. Res. Cannabis use and psychosis: a longi-
J. O., Opjordsmoen, S., Rund, B. tioning. Psychol. Med. 39, 16071616. 107, 158164. tudinal population-based study. Am.
R., Simonsen, E., Vaglum, P., and Neuchterlein, K. H., Dawson, M. E., and Schnell, T., Koethe, D., Daumann, J., J. Epidem. 156, 319327.
McGlashan, T. H. (2006). Substance Green, M. F. (1994). Information- and Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, E. (2009). Verdoux, H. (2004). Cannabis and psy-
abuse in first-episode non-affective processing abnormalities as neuropsy- The role of cannabis in cognitive chosis proneness. In Marijuana and
psychosis. Schizophr. Res. 88, 5562. chological vulnerability indicators for functioning of patients with schizo- Madness, D. Castle and R. Murray, eds
Leweke, F. M., Giuffrida, A., Wurster, schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. phrenia. Psychopharmacology (Berl) (Cambridge, Cambridge University
U., Emrich, H. M., and Piomelli, D. 90, 7179. 205, 4552. Press), pp. 7588.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org November 2009 | Volume 3 | Article 53 | 7


Lberg and Hugdahl Cannabis and schizophrenia cognition

Weinberger, D. R. (1995). From abuse and neurocognitive function conscripts of 1969: historical cohort Citation: Lberg EM and Hugdahl K (2009)
neuropathology to neurodevelop- in recent-onset schizophrenia. Eur. study. BMJ 325, 1199. Cannabis use and cognition in schizo-
ment. Lancet 346, 552557. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 257, phrenia. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 3:53. doi:
Wobrock, T., Sittinger, H., Behrendt, B., 203210. Conflict of Interest Statement: The 10.3389/neuro.09.053.2009
DAmelio, R., and Falkai, P. (2009). Woo, T. U., and Crowell, A. L. (2005). authors declare that the research was con- Copyright 2009 Lberg and Hugdahl.
Comorbid substance abuse and brain Targeting synapses and myelin in ducted in the absence of any commercial or This is an open-access article subject to an
morphology in recent-onset psycho- the prevention of schizophrenia. financial relationships that could be con- exclusive license agreement between the
sis. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. Schizophr. Res. 73, 193207. strued as a potential conflict of interest. authors and the frontiers research founda-
259, 2836. Zammit, S., Allebeck, P., Andreasson, S., tion, which permits unrestricted use, distri-
Wobrock, T., Sittinger, H., Behrendt, B., Lundberg, I., and Lewis, G. (2002). Received: 01 June 2009; paper pending pub- bution, and reproduction in any medium,
DAmelio, R., Falkai, P., and Caspari, Self reported cannabis use as a risk lished: 22 August 2009; accepted: 04 November provided the original authors and source
D. (2007). Comorbid substance factor for schizophrenia in Swedish 2009; published online: 24 November 2009. are credited.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org November 2009 | Volume 3 | Article 53 | 8

You might also like