On the book "Das Interpretive Universum" as posted recently on this forum:

The title is ambitious, but in the articles, there is no mention of the most relevant issue possible (at least
to me), which is how the great philosophers think out their respective philosophies. E. g., how does Kant
think out his philosophy? How does Hegel think out his philosophy? How does Heidegger think out his
philosophy?

This would be interpretation at the highest and most essential level, namel.

Orwell understood that language determined the being of Dasein. Limit the language and thus limit the
ways of being. We must be careful in how language is corrupted. In the taking over of words so that
they may be subverted, covered up in their true meaning or made unavailable, we take away the
possibility of a true understanding of our being. These are truly dangerous times.