Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ENG-001 - Capex Plan
ENG-001 - Capex Plan
ENG-001 - Capex Plan
ENG-001
CAPEX PLAN
ENGINEERING PROCESS
ENG-001
CAPEX PLAN
Hildo
0 1/jun/11 Original Edition
ADMGG
Hildo
A 14/jan/13 First Revision
ADMGG
Peter
B 1/dec/16 Second Revision
GPA
Target Public
Engineering Managers
Engineering Teams: Project Coordinators, Discipline Coordinators, Industrial
Installation Coordinators, Civil Construction Coordinators, Capex Planning and
Control, and Draftsmen.
Prerequisites
Gerdau Capex Management (GIG)
Duration
It is estimated that this self-training can be adequately carried out in a total of three
hours of study. Two sessions of study are recommended, organized in different
shifts, as follows:
First session - two hours of careful reading;
Second session - half hour review of the main contents, half hour performing
the self-evaluation, followed by a review of theoretical issues where there was
doubt.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this module is to present the procedures for:
(i) preparation of the Preliminary Study (PS) as described in GG-PR-169-012;
(ii) preparation, approval, implementation and control of the Capex Plan as
described in GG-PR-169-001.
LEARNING STAGES
EVALUATION PROCESS
After studying the content covered in this module, you will make a Theoretical Self
Evaluation, included in this training material.
Next you will submit yourself to a Theoretical Evaluation, where you should answer
correctly at least 70% of the questions. If you do not answer correctly 70% of the
questions, you should review the learning stages where you had more difficulty.
If necessary, ask for help to the Facilitator.
LEARNING STAGES
Activities Resources
FIELD OF APPLICATION
This document applies to all Engineering areas of Gerdau Business Divisions.
REFERENCES
GG-PR-169-003 - Engineering Action Plan
GG-PR-169-012 - Preliminary Study (PS)
GG-PR-169-501 - Technical Study (TS)
GG-PR-169-501 - Technical Study Preparation
DC 08 - Approval of Fixed Asset Projects.
RESPONSIBILITY
DEFINITIONS
The Part 1 presents the procedures for Preliminary Study (PS) preparation, as
described in GG-PR-169-012.
As presented in Figure 1, the Preliminary Study (PS) for a Capex must be prepared
during Conception phase, with the purpose of identifying, recording and assessing
the opportunities for new Capex under analysis.
Present information to identify the Capex for the selection and prioritization stages
in the preparation of the Capex Plan, according to the GG-PR-169-001 procedure.
It is important that the information used in the preparation of the study be up-to-
date and reliable, especially regarding budget, deadline and quantification of
benefits. This information is essential for proper calculations of financial indicators
and their criticality.
Figure 2 shows the relationship of the PS, developed in Conception phase, with the
other procedures and phaes previously referred.
Title: Inform the title of the Capex. The title must be aligned with the main scope
of the Capex. Pay attention, the same title will identify the Capex along its
implementation.
Objective: Describe the main objective of the Capex, explaining why it is being
proposed. The objective must be aligned with the benefits of the Capex.
Classification of objectives: Classify the Capex according to form GG-FM-169-
501 - Technical Study Preparation.
Criticality: Classify the Capex according to the evaluation criteria presented in
pages 16 to 19.
Scope: Describe the summary of the work to be carried out, mentioning the main
equipment, facilities and changes proposed for the Capex.
Budget:
Prepare a detailed budget of the main budget items in the
Capex, according to the Project Structure Plan (PEP
Elements);
Inform the schedule of disbursements for the budget items;
Include in the budget the amount planned for the
Transitional Investment execution (if you need a budget for
preparing the Technical Study);
Inform the main suppliers used as benchmark;
Schedule:
Inform the deadline for each of the activities in the standard-schedule of the
Preliminary Study. The schedule will be presented in months, 2-months,
quarters or semesters, depending on the total duration of the Capex;
Inform the milestones of Conclusion" and Start of Operation to define the
implementation deadlines of the Capex until its conclusion and start of
operation, respectively;
Assure to also include in the schedule the period of preparation of the
Technical Study and approval of the Capex;
Observe that the two first activities in the schedule (preparation of Technical
Study and approval of Capex) refer to the Transitional Investment;
Quantifiable benefits:
Describe only the benefits with financial gain with the implementation of the
Capex, classified as:
- cost reduction.
- increased capacity.
- quality improvement.
Inform the planned schedule for the estimated quantifiable benefits.
Comments:
Describe the benefits, classified as safety, reliability, environment and
administration/support;
Include information regarding the technology employed, aspects of safety and
environment, general observations and attachments.
Inform the defined Key Performance Indicators in order to measure the Capex
benefits. Attention: Key Performance Indicators must not refer to the Capex
management.
When preparing the Preliminary Study (PS), verify that the information it contains is
supported by the minimum data presented in Table 1.
Engineering Deliveries
Initial/Preliminary
Process - Block Diagram
The layout is schematic and is based on information
Layouts
available from other Capex.
Table 1. Data for PS preparation
NOTE:
Table 1 should be used as a checklist to assure the responsible team
that all minimum data were used during PS preparation. This is
important to assure the necessary quality for budget and schedule,
providing estimations with deviations equal or less than 30%.
Criticality (CR) is, therefore, the indicator used to compare and prioritize
sustainability Capex. Observe that mitigate means reduce to an
acceptable level the probability of occurrence and the impact that a
specific event would have over the business if the Capex is not
implemented.
CRITICALITY MATRIX
Criticality (CR) must be determined through the Criticality Matrix, considering the
impact and the probability of the occurrence of the event that the Capex is
supposed to eliminate or mitigate occurring.
To establish Criticality (CR) do the following:
Analyze the Capex classified as Safety, Environment and Reliability, together with
the people in charge of each process, using the qualification criteria defined by
the respective process;
The Capex classified as Administration/Support must use the probability (Table 3)
and impact criteria (Table 4);
Engineering must ensure comparability between the definitions of the different
processes and define the Criticality (CR) according to the Criticality Matrix, as
presented in Table 2.
Impact
Criticality Matrix
Low Medium High
High CR3 CR2 CR1
Probability Medium CR4 CR3 CR2
Low CR5 CR4 CR3
Table 2. Criticality Matrix
The values presented in Table 2 inform the different levels of Criticality, as follow:
By those criteria, the Capex categorized in the CR1 and CR2 range should be
selected and prioritized with the purpose of reducing their Criticality to CR3 or below.
The levels of probability and impact of the events must be evaluated according with
the metrics presented in next sections.
PROBABILITY
In order to determine the probability, the criteria presented in Table 3 must be used,
considering the evidence that lead to the possibility of the event occurring.
LEVEL OF IMPACT:
To establish the level of impact, use the criteria presented in Table 4, considering the
classification of the sustainability Capex.
Environmental
Continue...
LEVEL OF IMPACT:
Reliability / Quality
Evaluate
accumulated
economic impact due
to production delays1,
repair costs and Total accumulated Total accumulated Total accumulated
remaining costs impact less than impact between impact more than 25%
caused by the event, 2.5% of the Mill 2.5% and 25% of of the Mill monthly net
or for Quality monthly net sales the Mill monthly net sales revenue or US$ 10
projects, due to revenue. sales revenue. million.
Market Share
reduction caused by
non-compliance to
quality requirements.
1- The economic impact linked to production loss or Market Share reduction is only valid if it cannot be compensated by
another unit.
DEFINITIONS
The Part 2 presents the procedures for preparation, approval, implementation and
control of the Capex Plan, as described in GG-PR-169-001.
The Capex Plan (CP) represents all capital investments necessary to achieve the
strategic goals defined in the BD Roadmap, with a more detailed view of the
Business Division Execution Plan (PEX).
This procedure is part of Capex Plan and Execution and Control phases.
The preparation of the Capex Plan is shared: it begins at the level of all the areas
and processes of the Industrial Unit (with focus on results, risks and sustainability of
the operation) and it is complemented and consolidated on the Business Division and
Gerdau levels.
Figure 4 shows how Capex Plan interacts with other Engineering Process phases.
The Capex is developed and approved in Capex Plan phase. All available input data
that contributes for the procedures, from identification of opportunities to Plan
approval, must be used.
In the Planning phase, the Capex Plan approved is used to develop the Technical
Studies Preparation Plan (TSs) which is part of the Engineering Action Plan.
In the Execution and Control phase, during the Engineering Meeting, the
implementation and control of the Capex Plan is carried out.
The investments included in the Capex Plan must be in line with the
Execution Plan of the Business Division and with the Action Plan
for the Industrial Unit.
In this procedure, the Capex Plan defines the portfolio of capital investments planned
for the next planning cycle. To prepare the Capex Plan, observe the following steps:
The Capex necessary to realize the Execution Plan for the Business Divisions
and the Action Plan for the Industrial Unit and main Capex necessary to
support the strategies of the BD Roadmap;
The Capex that can be included in the plan from the prepared Preliminary
Studies. It is important that these studies are up-to-date, mainly regarding the
quantification of benefits in order to define financial indicators and their Level
of Criticality;
NOTE:
According to literature, the step of identification consists of developing
an updated list with sufficient information about new opportunities for
investments and those already in progress.
Categorize, in turn, is to combine the opportunities of the portfolio into
groups pre-established and strategically important, allowing a view of
the investments in each category.
Categorize: Group and prioritize Capex projects within the portfolio in accordance
with the three classifications following:
Type of Direction:
- Competitiveness: defined by the level of the Industrial Unit, or Business
Division which add value and improve results through quantifiable benefits
of cost reduction, increased quality (price) and increased capacity (sales).
These types of preliminary studies must present indicators for the
evaluation of financial return, according to the GG-PR-169-002 Return on
Investment (ROI).
- Sustainability: contributes to maintain Business Divisions through
improvements in Capex with benefits in safety, environment, reliability,
quality assurance and administration/support. This type of direction must
present the results for the Criticality evaluation, as established by procedure
GG-PR-169-012 Preliminary Study;
NOTE:
Prioritizing is to sort the selected components within each category,
according to expected benefits and established criteria. Meanwhile,
balancing aims to check whether the set of opportunities is balanced to
meet all guidelines, given the constraints of existing resources.
Important: Approval of the Capex Plan does not eliminate the need for
individual approval of each Capex.
For execution and control of the Annual Capex Plan, do the following:
Prepare the Annual Capex Plan according to the standardized form (see attached
example). The data included in the Plan must be the same as those approved in
the 3-year Capex Plan.
The following information must be presented:
Original Planned: the originally approved
Capex Budget (in the 3-year Capex Plan).
It is important to remember that the
original Capex budget in the approved
Capex Plan must be kept fixed
throughout the year.
Present Estimate: the best estimate for the updated value of the budget based
on more accurate information in regard to the Capex on the date of revision.
Approved: the approved budget; considering that the Capex has been
approved at the appropriate level.
The number of the final document (PAI, PAI-C or RAI) used in the approval
and the date of approval by the last approval level planned in Guideline DC 08
Approval of Fixed Asset Projects;
The categorization of capex regarding the type of direction (Expansion/New
Business, Operational Efficiency or Sustainability);
Use the Annual Capex Plan as the reference for the control of what is planned
and executed. Conduct the follow-up in The Execution and Control phase, during
the Engineering Meeting. Items that must specifically be monitored are as follows:
The status of cancelled capex. In this case, the information under the current
budget estimate column must be zeroed out;
New capex projects under consideration, scheduled to undergo approval, but
which are not in the approved plan. In this case, the information under the
original planned budget column must be kept at zero.
The best estimate for the total budget amount of the Capex which is still under
consideration. This is important to keep the column current budget estimate
updated with the total amount planned for the year;
Observe that changes in the total budget of the Capex Plan can be requested by
the Industrial Unit (operational level) or by the Business Division and Gerdau
(Strategic level). These changes must be approved by the Gerdau Executive
Committee (GEC) and by the Board of Directors (BD) before they can be
considered as effective;
5. Choose the alternative that indicates how should be evaluated the Capex that
have no quantifiable benefits (Safety, Environment, Reliability and Administration /
Support):
A. ( ) should be evaluated by the similarity they have with other previous Capex.
B. ( ) should be evaluated by an economic forecasting conducted by the team.
C. ( ) should be evaluated by the criticality of the event that the Capex is intended to
eliminate or mitigate.
D. ( ) cannot be evaluated, since only Capex with quantifiable benefits can be
evaluated.
6. Indicate who has responsibility for implementing the procedure of the Capex Plan:
A. ( ) Project Coordinator.
B. ( ) Engineering Manager.
C. ( ) Area Manager.
D. ( ) Draftsman.
9. Complete the gaps: in the Capex Plan, __________ refers to the originally
approved Capex Budget (in the 3-year Capex Plan). This budget __________ be
kept fixed throughout the year.
A. ( ) Value Analysis; does not have to.
B. ( ) Original Planned; must.
C. ( ) Value Analysis; must.
D. ( ) Original Planned; does not have to.
10. Mark the indicator to be used for measuring the execution and control of the 3-
Year Capex Plan:
A. ( ) The productive growth of the Industrial Unit.
B. ( ) The management goal - Improvements achieved.
C. ( ) The Control Item - Compliance with the Capex Plan.
D. ( ) The Control Item - Quality of the Capex Plan.
ANSWERS
1. A
2. C
3. D
4. B
5. C
6. B
7. A
8. D
9. B
10. C
REFERENCES
FRAME, D.J. Managing Project in Organizations:how to make the best use of time,
techniques, and people. Planning and Control Tolls, 3 ed. ISBN 0-7879-6831-5. San
Francisco:Jossey-Bass, 2003.