This document provides 19 references on topics related to bibliometric indicators such as the impact factor, h-index, and g-index. The references cover the history, meaning, and limitations of the impact factor, proposals to adjust its calculation, comparisons to alternative metrics, and software to calculate bibliometric indices.
This document provides 19 references on topics related to bibliometric indicators such as the impact factor, h-index, and g-index. The references cover the history, meaning, and limitations of the impact factor, proposals to adjust its calculation, comparisons to alternative metrics, and software to calculate bibliometric indices.
This document provides 19 references on topics related to bibliometric indicators such as the impact factor, h-index, and g-index. The references cover the history, meaning, and limitations of the impact factor, proposals to adjust its calculation, comparisons to alternative metrics, and software to calculate bibliometric indices.
1. Fassoulaki A, Papilas K, Paraskeva A, Patris K. Impact factor bias and proposed
adjustments for its determination. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;46:902 5. [PubMed] 2. Not-so-deep impact. Nature. 2015;435:10034. [PubMed] 3. Malathi M, Thappa DM. The intricacies of impact factor and mid-term review of editorship. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013;78:14. [PubMed] 4. Balhara YP. Publication: An essential step in research. Lung India. 2013;28:324 5. [PMC free article][PubMed] 6. Stringer MJ, Sales-Pardo M, Nunes Amaral LA. Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information. PLoS ONE 2008; 3: e1683. 7. RAE 2008; Research Assessment Exercise. http://www.rae. ac.uk/ [Accessed 17 September 2008]. 8. Wikipedia. Ofcial World Golf Rankings. http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Golf rankings [Accessed 17 September 2008]. 9. Gareld E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 2006; 295: 9093. 10. Gareld E. The agony and the ecstasy; the history and meaning of the journal impact factor. International Congress on Peer Review And Biomedical Publication, Chicago, September 16, 2005; 122. 11. Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997; 314: 497. 12. PLoS Editors. The impact factor game. It is time to nd a better way to assess the scientic literature. PLos Med 2006; 3: e291. 13. ISI Journal Citation Reports. http://admin-apps.isiknowledge. com/JCR/JCR [Accessed 17 September 2008]. 14. Elsevier BV.Scopus abstract and citation database. http://www. scopus.com/scopus/home.url [Accessed 17 September 2008]. 15. Hamilton DP. Research papers: whos uncited now? Science 1991; 251: 25. 16. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individuals scientic research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 1656916572. 17. Egghe L. Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics 2006; 69: 131152. 18. Harzing AW, Van der Wal R. A google scholar h-index for journals: an alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. http://www.harzing.com/download/ gshindex.pdf [Accessed 17 September 2008]. 19. harzing.com. Publish or Perish. http://www.harzing.com/ resources.htm#/pop.htm [Accessed 17 September 2008].