Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ver.7 Effects of Fibrin 23 and ARG Fibers On Porous Concrete
Ver.7 Effects of Fibrin 23 and ARG Fibers On Porous Concrete
Ver.7 Effects of Fibrin 23 and ARG Fibers On Porous Concrete
Introduction
Environmental issues has changed the mindset and the mechanism of material
and structural designing. Since then, a lot of structures design and specifications has
effects is now one of the factors to be considered when designing structures. The use of
locally produced eco- friendly alternative building materials that offer unique strength,
stability and versatility in its applications have significantly become a necessity in material
exemption. Porous concrete is a free drainage concrete, it means that the air and water
permeate freely through systems of interconnected voids and pores. In this perspective it
pavements, parking lots, sidewalks and so on. Also, porous concrete has alternate names
mixing coarse aggregates with cement, water, little to no fine aggregates and admixture.
Porous concrete helps in storm/ rain water runoff management recharging local aquifers
cement was probably amongst the latest materials on the market to have contained large
quantities of asbestos (Hardie, 2003) but in recent decades, government regulations have
banned the use of asbestos due to its harmful effects on health. Thus, attempts have
been made to find replacement for asbestos (Morteza et al, 2010). The most commonly
used fibers are synthetic, steel, glass, carbon, and graphite which contribute high strength
Newly introduced to the Philippines and just recently been approved for use by the
polypropylene extract fiber, non-toxic and not hazardous to health specifically develop as
a crack control additive for cementitious material. It is resistant to acid and alkali
chemicals and reduces the occurrence of plastic shrinkage and settlement cracks, while
enhancing the surface properties and durability of hardened concrete. The fiber are
extremely fine, single filament and coated with special compound to aid dispersion that
Fibrin 23 is used in all ground and suspended floor slabs, plastering of internal or
Properties of FIBRIN 23
Polypropylene extract
Material
synthetic fiber
Design Micromonofilament
Fiber Length 12 mm
18m nominal diameter
Diameter (almost half the diameter
of human hair)
Shape Crimped
Color Natural
Tensile Strength 550 MPa max.
Melting Point 160 C max
UV Resistance High
Matrix Bonding Excellent
Coated for Dispersion,
Surface
adhesion and bonding
Density 0.91 g nominal
Absorption Nil
Chemical Resistance Satisfactory
Conductivity Minimal
Glass fibers are among the oldest and most versatile industrial materials known
today. They are readily produced from raw materials, which are available in virtually
unlimited supply. All glass fibers are derived from compositions containing silica. They
exhibit properties such as strength, flexibility, and stiffness. Glass fibers are used in the
manufacture of structural composites, printed circuit boards and a wide range of special-
purpose products.
designed specifically for use in concrete to prevent cracking and increase its engineering
properties. ARG fibers are manufactured from a specially formulated glass composition
with an optimum level of Zirconia (ZrO2) to be suitable for use in concrete. These ARG
fibers are designed to resist breaking down during mixing and processing so that it stays
basically as a bundle of filaments. ARG fiber have high tensile strength and modulus.
fiber- reinforced porous concrete, this research investigates the potentials of Fibrin 23
Many of the conventional structural materials has its own strengths and
weaknesses like steel has high tensile strength but corrodes if exposed for a long time.
Porous Concrete has high void content and good in sound absorption. However, it
has low compressive strength and flexural strength thus, making porous concrete limited
fibers are mixed with porous concrete as reinforcement for investigation. Can these
synthetic fibers contribute to any significant increase in strength qualified for standards?
We used synthetic fibers because natural fibers deteriorate rapidly due to constant
Resistant Glass Fiber enhance the properties of porous concrete in terms of strength
Porous concrete allows rain and storm water runoff to infiltrate through it rather
than flood the surrounding areas or create ponding. Also, it acts as a filter trapping and
removing pollutants from rain runoff. Although porous concrete is ecologically good, it has
a lot of voids causing the strength of the concrete to significantly decrease. Because of
this, porous concrete is often limited to its use as sidewalks, driveways and parking lots.
There are previous studies made that uses Fibrin 23 and ARG fibers in
conventional concrete but not in porous concrete. This study is done to assess the
effectiveness of the newly produced synthetic fiber, specifically Fibrin 23 and ARG Fibers,
on a porous concrete mix for pavement in order to increase the flexural strength while
maintaining the its porosity. Also, this studys purpose is to compare which between the
Fibrin 23 and ARG fibers is more effective in porous concrete in terms of strength and
porosity.
To determine the effects of adding Fibrin 23 and Alkali Resistant Glass (ARG)
strength and porosity of porous concrete and evaluate the effectiveness of using fibers in
reinforcement
The study is concentrated on the development and finding out the effects of Fibrin
The study aims to carry out physical and mechanical properties of the Fibrin 23 and Alkali
Resistant Glass Fiber reinforced porous concrete in accordance with ASTM Standards.
Unit Weight, Specific Gravity and Water Absorption of the aggregates, abrasion
resistance and void content test determined the material properties. Infiltration rate test
(ASTM C1701) determines the physical property while Compressive strength test (ASTM
C39) and Flexural strength test (ASTM C78) determines the mechanical property of the
pavement. Also, the producing and testing of samples shall be done with accordance to
the design parameters for materials and test requirements stated in Item 311: Portland
compressive strengths in the range of 500 to 4000 psi (3.5 MPa to 28 MPa), which is
suitable for a wide range of applications. (Tennis et al, 2004) Typical values are about
2500 psi (17 MPa). As with any concrete, the properties and combinations of specific
materials, as well as placement techniques and environmental conditions, will dictate the
actual in-place strength. However, currently there is no ASTM test standard for
compressive strength of porous concrete. Testing variability measured with various draft
test methods has been found to be high and therefore compressive strength is not
content between 15% to 25% as measured by ASTM C1688: Standard Test Method for
Density and Void Content of Freshly Mixed Pervious Concrete, be specified for quality
University of the East
College of Engineering 7|Page
assurance and acceptance. As stated in ACI 522.1-13: Specification for Pervious
Concrete Pavement, the tolerance for the specified void content is 5%.
Flexural strength in pervious concretes generally ranges between about 150 psi (1
MPa) and 550 psi (3.8 MPa). Many factors influence the flexural strength, particularly
degree of compaction, porosity, and the aggregate-to-cement (A/C) ratio. However, the
typical application constructed with pervious concrete does not require the measurement
not qualified and quantified in this research. Flexural strength test (ASTM C78) at fourteen
(14) days and compressive strength test (ASTM C39) at twenty- eight (28) days will be
done according to the test requirements for pavements required by the DPWH Blue Book
(Item 311.2.11). The design strength for compression is 24.1 MPa (3500 psi) and flexural
strength of not less than 3.8 MPa (550 psi) when tested by the third-point method or 4.5
MPa (650 psi) when tested by the mid-point method at fourteen (14) days (DPWH Blue
Book Item 311.2.11). The value of infiltration rate of porous concrete should be between
288 756 in/hr (0.203 0.533 cm/sec) (Tennis et al, 2004). Due to time and financial
constraint, curing days are limited to only one per test. 14 days for flexural strength test
and 28 days for both compressive strength test and Infiltration rate test. Costing of the
porous concrete pavement fabrication was not also included in this study.
Concrete. The framework is divided into three (3) phases, Input Process Output. This
framework is considered to be the general guideline and procedure that the research
Input phase
It is essential to determine the focus study and background of the research which
is to evaluate and assess the effectiveness of Fibrin 23 and ARG Fiber as Reinforcement
in Porous Concrete Pavement. The main components for comparison of the Fiber
reinforced Porous Concrete are Fibrin 23 and Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers. Other
components of the porous concrete are as follows: Portland cement, Coarse Aggregates,
Fine Aggregates, Admixture and Potable Water. These materials are subjected to
undergo process and several tests using the instruments used for the specific tests in the
Process phase
It is essential to identify and produce a time frame for the study, from Material
Procurement and Preparation to the application of tests on the materials to secure the
Preparation and testing of Coarse and Fine aggregates, and cement, Fabrication of
specimens for laboratory testing, curing of specimens. The specimens are subjected to
different tests according to American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) Standards
and ARG Fibers in Porous Concrete pavement. Consequently, the specimens (Fiber
reinforced Porous Concrete) will undergo tests to determine its compressive strength,
Output phase
entitled, Effects of Fibrin 23 and Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers in Porous Concrete.
Herewith are the results and graphs of the tests undertaken to the material, Fibrin 23
Reinforced Porous Concrete and Alkali Resistant Reinforced Porous Concrete in relative
Specifically, this study entitled: The Effects of Fibrin 23 and Alkali Resistant Glass
To the Civil Engineers, this will provide data to those professionals who are
materials for reinforcement of porous concrete pavements which can offer unique
strength, stability, versatility, affordability, and safety to both users and environment.
To the Construction Industry, this will give them information on meeting the
market standards and on building roadways and sidewalks with complete advantages
To the Community, this will give them insights about prospective sources of
fibers and other natural resources. Also, using porous concrete as research will promote
To the Future Researchers, this will serve as their reference for the future studies
using other fibers or mix designs as a potential source information that could be used in
Alkali- Resistant Glass Fiber (ARG) Derived from silica, a specially formulated glass
AR Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (ARGFRC) - Concrete mixed with Alkali Resistant
Glass Fibers
Asbestos A naturally occurring silicate materials which were often mixed with concrete
Coarse Aggregate - Particles greater than 4.75mm, but generally range between 9.5mm
Concrete Composite made by mixing Cement, Fine and coarse aggregates, water,
and/ or admixture
Fiber Reinforced Concrete (FRC) Concrete mixed with fibers either natural or
Fine Aggregate Sand or crushed stones with particles passing through a 9.5mm sieve
Flexural Strength The parameter or ability to resist deformation under load, also known
Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) - Concrete mixed with Ordinary Glass Fibers
Porous Concrete A concrete that allows water to pass through it due to its voids, also
Specific Gravity The ratio of density of the material to the density of a standard (usually
water or air)
SSD Saturated Surface Dry. It is a state where the surface of a particle is dry but its
This chapter shows the different foreign and local studies related to this research.
connected to the present work are also examined. Moreover, comparisons from previous
related studies are discussed and the framework of the concept to be conducted are
The pervious concrete system and its corresponding strength are as important as its
indicate that porous concrete has lower strength capabilities than conventional concrete
and will only support light traffic loadings. Voids are supposed to reduce the strength of
concrete (Klieger, 2003), In spite of the high voids content, properly placed pervious
concrete pavements can achieve strengths in excess of 3000 psi or 20.5 MPa and flexural
strengths of more than 500 psi or 3.5 MPa. This strength is more than adequate for most
low-volume pavement applications, including high axle loads for garbage truck and
characteristics. However, to achieve these results, mix design and construction details
According to the DPWH Blue Book, the only test done to pavements is the flexural
strength test. A previous study was conducted to test the durability and flexural strength
of porous concrete by varying cement content. Using cement weighing 600 lbs., 548 lbs.,
and 462 lbs. for Mix 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The water- cement ratio used for all mixes
is 0.35. The results of the flexural strength test are: Mix 1 and 2 were acceptable for
pavement usage and durable considering that they reached the 600 lbs. flexural strength
2004).
Use of fibers in a brittle is not a new concept, the Egyptians used animal hairs,
straw to reinforce mud bricks and walls in houses, around 1500 B.C. (Balaguru et al,
1992). Ronald F. Zollo presented a report on fiber reinforced concrete in which he had
mentioned about 30 years of development and research. In the report it is claimed that
the work on Fiber Reinforced Concrete (FRC) started around 1960. Since than a lot of
work has been done on FRC using different methods of production as well as different
types of fiber, size of fiber, orientation and distribution. Portland cement pervious concrete
(PCPC) is increasingly used in the United States because of its various environmental
benefits such as controlling storm water runoff, restoring groundwater supplies, and
reducing water and soil pollution (Youngs, 2005 and Kajio et al, 1998). PCPC is usually
designed with high void content ranging from 15 to 25% due to its permeability
requirement. Single sized aggregate is commonly used to achieve such void content
(Tennis et al, 2004). Because of the single sized aggregates, the strength of PCPC
made is inadequate. As a result of this, addition of a small amount of fine sand and fiber
will improve the mixture. Replacement of fine sand (approximately 7% by weight of total
aggregate) to the mixes significantly improved the concrete strength and freezing
thawing resistance while maintaining adequate water permeability. Also, addition of fiber
increased the concrete strength, freezing thawing resistance as well as void content
significantly increased the permeability of the concrete. More importantly, it improved the
splitting tensile strength of concrete, which in turn enhanced the concrete freezing
Instead of using natural fibers such abaca and coconut fiber, this study will use
Reasons for putting these fibers into cement-based materials are generally agreed
to be as follows:
Results of the study indicated that the Portland Cement Porous Concrete (PCPC)
made with single-sized coarse aggregate generally had high permeability but not
of total aggregate) to the mixes significantly improved the concrete strength and freezing-
amount of fiber varying from 1%, 3%, and 5% of the total mass of cement, cut in 5 cm (2
in) length, slightly increased the void content and increased the permeability of the
concrete. More importantly, it improved the compressive and splitting tensile strength of
the concrete, which in turn enhanced the concrete Freeze-Thaw durability. The study
concludes that when properly designed and constructed, proper strength and F-T
durability of PCPC can be achieved by use small amount of sand and microfibers in the
The table below shows the summary of related PCPC properties from literature:
the concrete properties and improve its durability. It is developed as a crack control
additive for concrete. The use of Fibrin, mainly to increase the impact resistance and to
reduce the shrinkage cracking of concrete, is a defined additive in the DPWH Blue Book
Section 311.2.8 issued in year 2013. It has contributed to increase the compressive and
and Standard, conducted a series of tests in year 2000 and lately this year 2015 to confirm
if the studies abroad on the use of polypropylene fibers can be used considering
Philippine conditions. The tests aim to know the effects of polypropylene fibers using
University of the East
College of Engineering 20 | P a g e
Fibrin 23 on concrete in its fresh and hardened state for compressive strength, flexural
Fibrin 23, used as secondary reinforcement, helps reduce shrinkage and control
cracking without altering the mix design. Adding fibers to concrete normally reduces the
slump with minimal effect in workability thus, requiring the use of super plasticizer.
The 2000 test program showed that the compressive strength increased by 18.4%
at the 28 day curing period. The results showed that the slab with Fibrin can resist impact
at a ratio of 1.6 to 5.4 times stronger compared to a control concrete. Also, the results
showed minimal increase in flexural strength. The main objective of the 2015 test program
was to confirm previous testing done in year 2000 and further know the use of Fiber
Reinforced Concrete to improve the durability and workability of the concrete, minimizing
rate of bleeding, and preventing segregation during placement to achieve a durable and
longer lasting service life of the concrete structure. The 2015 test showed that the
compressive strength increased about 12% on the concrete with Fibrin 23 compared with
the control concrete. In terms of flexural strength, it became higher by 18% when
reinforced with Fibrin 23. Like the previous test, results of impact resistance showed 2
glass fiber reinforced polyester polymer concrete. Griffiths concluded that the modulus of
rupture or flexure of polymer concrete containing 20% polyester resin and about 79% fine
silica aggregate is about 20 MPa. The addition of about 1.5% chopped glass fibers (by
weight of cement) to the material increases the modulus of rupture by about 20% and the
fracture toughness by about 55%. Overall, glass fibers improve the strength of the
concrete by increasing the design force required for deformation and improve the
concrete with grades of M20 to M50 in 2010. They observed that the percentage increase
of compressive strength of various grades of glass fiber concrete mixes compared with
28 days compressive strength is observed from 20 to 25% and the percentage increase
of flexural and split tensile strength of various grades of glass fiber concrete mixes
Jamboo Kumar Jain (2015) studied the effect of short discrete glass fibers on the
strength of concrete tiles by using up to 1.5% fiber content by weight of concrete. ARG
fibers were used. The glass fibers used had a density of 2.7 gm/cm 3, tensile strength
1700 MPa and Youngs Modulus 72 GPa. Compressive strength, split tensile, and flexural
strength test were used to determine the strength properties. Jain observed that the fiber
content must not be beyond 0.7% for proper workability. Observations of the study are as
follows:
presence of short discrete glass fibers with fiber content in the range 0.1 to 0.3 %
2. The split tensile strength of concrete increases with the addition of glass fibers.
3. The flexural strength of concrete increases with the increase in fiber content and
4. The wet transverse strength of tiles increases and the increase has been found
5. The water absorption of the concrete also decreases with increase in fiber
content.
6. The compressive strength of concrete with admixture was not affected up to 0.4
% fiber content but decreased with the presence of higher amount of fibers.
3.1. Methodology
In order to evaluate the effects of fibrin 23 and alkali-resistant glass fiber on the
considered as one of the most precise studies and has the most conclusive power. And,
its also known to be particularly effective in supporting hypotheses about cause and
effect relationships.
The Fibrin 23 was collected from Tertex International Philippines Inc. and the
Alkali-Resistant Glass (ARG) fiber was collected from Polymer Products Philippines Inc.
The strands were prepared into 12 mm cut fibers for Fibrin 23, and 50 mm cut fibers for
ARG, to serve as an additional material for the desired porous concrete mix prior to
The standards adopted prior to the designing of porous concrete mix as per
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) are composed of ASTM C188 -
Standard Test Method for Density of Hydraulic Cement, ASTM C29 - Standard Test
Method for Bulk Unit Weight in Aggregate, ASTM C127 and C128 -Standard Test Method
for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Fine and Coarse Aggregates, ASTM C136 -
Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates, ASTM C131 -
Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine, and ASTM C143 - Standard Test
determined through each laboratory test includes the specific gravity of cement, unit
weight, specific gravity, absorption, fineness modulus of fine aggregates, and hardness
The design of porous concrete mix was based on a previous study, Development
of Mix Proportion for Functional and Durable Pervious Concrete by Wang et al, 2006.
The cement coarse aggregate ratio is 1:4.5, but a small amount of sand was added to
increase the strength of concrete, replacing approximately 10% of the total mass of
coarse aggregates. Due to the low strength of porous concrete and to avoid accumulation
of cement paste in the bottom of the sample, the water-cement ratio recommended for
porous mix ranges from 0.26 0.30. In order to increase the workability of the mix without
compromising its strength, a super-plasticizer, Spark Superplas 0831, was added to the
mix. Three specimens were prepared for each test for compressive and flexural test
analysis, three samples of plain porous concrete, and three samples each reinforced with
fibrin 23 and ARG fiber, were tested in the universal testing machine (UTM). For infiltration
rate analysis, the same number of samples were tested. The curing of samples is exactly
fourteen (14) days for compressive and flexural strength tests and exactly twenty-eight
accordance with ASTM C39 - Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of
accordance with ASTM C78 - Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete
(Using Simple Beam with Third- Point Loading). The infiltration rate test of porous
Eagle Portland cement was used as binder of the porous concrete mix, and is
Standard gravel, passing 3/8 (9.5 mm) sieve but retained on No.4 (4.75 mm)
sieve, was used as a component of the porous concrete mix, and is here
Standard sand was used to replace 6.5% of the total mass of gravel, and is
Spark Superplas 0831 was used as super plasticizer in the porous concrete
Synthetic fibers, namely Fibrin 23 and Alkali-Resistant Glass, ARG) fiber were
Potable water was used in washing of synthetic fibers and in the porous
concrete mix.
Universal Testing Machine (UTM) was used for the compressive and flexural
strength test in accordance with ASTM C39 and ASTM C78, respectively.
Los Angeles Abrasion Machine was used for testing the abrasion of coarse
ASTM C136, and also were used by the researchers to obtain a well-graded
coarse aggregates.
Beam moulds (4 x 4 x 12) were used for the flexural strength test in
Rectangular moulds (14 x 14 x 4) were used for the infiltration rate test in
Infiltration ring (12 x 2) was used to measure the infiltration rate of the
oven-dry the aggregates in accordance with ASTM C127, ASTM C128, and
ASTM C136.
Solid, steel spheres were used as abrasive charge for testing the hardness
Grease were applied at the sides of the mold to prevent sample from sticking
Measuring device for measuring dimensions of molds and samples, and for
The gathering and preparation of materials was done first. The aggregates were
soaked in water for one day and then wiped using a dry towel to achieve Saturated
Surface Dry (SSD) condition. The tests performed were ASTM C188 (Standard Test
Method for Density of Hydraulic Cement), ASTM C29 (Standard Test Method for Bulk
Unit Weight in Aggregate), ASTM C127 and C128 (Standard Test Method for Specific
Gravity and Absorption of Fine and Coarse Aggregates), ASTM C136 (Standard Test
Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates), ASTM C131 (Standard Test
In accordance with ASTM C188, a water bath was used to stabilize the
temperature of the kerosene at 20OC. A standard weight of 64g was placed at the Le
Chatelier flask, with the initial and final volumetric readings of the kerosene noted. The
unit weight and specific gravity of cement were then calculated from the weight and
volumetric data.
determine the unit weight of aggregates. The measure was filled with water at room
temperature with any water that have overflowed eliminated, and the mass of water and
measure was determined. To calculate the volume, V, of the cylindrical measure, the
temperature of the water was determined and its density was calculated based on the
temperature measured. After determining the volume of the measure, the measure was
filled to approximately 1/3 of the measure with aggregates and stroked 25 times with a
tamping rod, and the procedure was repeated until the measure was filled with
aggregates. The mass of the measure plus its contents was determined, and the mass of
the measure alone. The unit weight of aggregates was then calculated from the weight
M = (G T) / V
where:
gravel and sand into water is done 24 hours prior to the test proper to essentially fill the
while a wire basket and spring balance are used in weighing the gravel. Weight by
displacement method was adopted for computing the volume of the sample that was used
to calculate the relative density (specific gravity) of the aggregates, while the ratio
between the weights of aggregates at both SSD and oven-dried states were adopted in
where:
In accordance with ASTM C136, a 500 g sample of sand and 1 kg sample of gravel
is prepared prior to drying into the oven capable of maintaining a uniform temperature of
110OC for 15 to 20 minutes. The standard sizes of sieves are arranged in decreasing
sizes wherein the over-dried aggregates will be putted on the uppermost sieve. Agitate
sieves by hand or by a sieve shaker for five (5) minutes, thereafter, the individual weights
in each sieve and pan are determined. A tabulated summary of the weights retained in
each sieve were used to determine the fineness modulus (FM) of the aggregates.
In accordance with ASTM C131, a 5 kg sample of gravel was washed and oven-
dried in oven capable of maintaining a uniform temperature of 110 OC. Prior to testing, the
gravel was divided in different size fractions by sieving depending on the grading of the
coarse aggregates. The grading of coarse aggregates in the study was Grade C, thus
2500 grams of gravel passing 3/8 (9.5 mm) sieve but retained on (6.35 mm) sieve
and 2500 grams of gravel passing (6.35 mm) sieve but retained on No. 4 sieve (4.75
mm) sieve were prepared, and put in the Los Angeles Abrasion machine together with 8
solid steel spheres having a mass between 390 and 445 g. The drum was rotated for 500
revolutions at 30 to 33 rev/min. After the machine finished rotating the required revolution,
the gravel was then sieved on the No. 4 (4.75 mm) sieve, then sieve those that passed
the No.4 sieve on the No. 12 (1.70 mm) sieve. The materials retained on the No. 4 and
No. 12 sieve were combined and oven-dried to calculate the percent wear or Los Angeles
Abrasion Value (L.A.A.V.) of the coarse aggregates. The value of L.A.A.V. should be less
than 30% for the coarse aggregate to be deemed suitable for all mixture (ASTM C131).
( #12)
. . . . = 100
Proportion for Functional and Durable Pervious Concrete (Wang et al., 2006) as shown
in Table 3.1. The cement coarse aggregate ratio is 1:4.5, but a small amount of sand
was added to increase the strength of concrete, replacing approximately 10% of the total
mass of coarse aggregates. Due to the low strength of porous concrete and to avoid
accumulation of cement paste in the bottom of the sample, the water-cement ratio
recommended for porous mix ranges from 0.26 0.30. In order to increase the workability
of the mix without compromising its strength, a super-plasticizer, Spark Superplas 0831,
was added to the mix. Fibrin 23 and alkali-resistant glass (ARG) fiber was used as fiber
reinforcement for flexure. The length of the fiber was 12 mm for fibrin 23 and 50 mm for
ARG and the fiber content of each sample was varied from 1%, 3% and 5% of the total
mass of cement. On the preparation of cylindrical concrete specimen, concrete beam and
rectangular mold (14 x 14 x 4) were used in pouring the concrete mix. During the
experiment, the mixing of the components was done manually, facilitated properly and
following the mixing proportions of sand, water, gravel, cement, and admixture. However,
careful addition of water was observed in the preparation, since overfed water in the
concrete mix causes it to be permanently unusable. Before the pouring of concrete to the
molds, a slump test in accordance with ASTM C143, was conducted from a portion of the
1).
mold with oil/grease applied at the sides of the molds to prevent the sample from sticking
to the mold after drying. Three samples for cylinders, beams and/or porous pavement for
each fiber type (fibrin 23 and alkali-resistant glass), fiber content (0, 1, 3, 5%), mechanical
and physical tests (compression, flexure, and infiltration rate), and curing age (14 and 28
days) were prepared. The poured concrete was tamped 25 times by a tamping rod, at
every layer, for a total of three layers. Then, the top of the beam and cylindrical sample
In accordance with ASTM C143, a sample of freshly mixed concrete was placed
and compacted by rodding each of the 3 layers for 25 times in a clean and dampened
mold shaped as the frustum of a cone. After the top layer has been rodded, the excess
material were stroked off the surface of the concrete by means of a rolling motion of the
tamping rod. Concrete from the area surrounding the base of the mold were removed to
preclude interference with the movement of slumping concrete. The mold is raised
carefully in a vertical direction, and the concrete is allowed to subside. The vertical
distance between the original and displaced position of the center of the top surface of
3.6. Curing
Twenty-four (24) hours from the time of preparation, the porous concrete samples
were immersed underwater. Curing period of exactly fourteen (14) days for flexure, and
a curing period of exactly twenty-eight (28) days for compression and infiltration rate is
then started.
In accordance with ASTM C39, the equipment used to test the compressive
Taking into account compression only, compressive axial load is applied to molded
cylinders at a rate which is within a prescribed range until failure occurs. The loads are
then recorded on the machine where the compressive strength can be determined.
University of the East
College of Engineering 34 | P a g e
=
where:
In accordance with ASTM C78, the equipment used to test the flexural strength of
concrete beam specimens is also the Universal Testing Machine (UTM). Taking into
account the flexure only, three point flexural test is applied, wherein the beam is subjected
to loads at three points (middle and ends). The loads are then recorded on the machine
3
=
2 2
where:
sealed to the surface of the porous pavement by applying clay around the bottom edge
of the ring. Two lines at a distance of 10 and 15 mm (0.40 and 0.60 in.) from the bottom
of the ring were marked on the inner surface of the ring. After pre-wetting the test location,
a given mass of water, depending on how long the porous concrete can drain the water
during pre-wetting, was poured into the ring and the time for water to infiltrate the porous
pavement is then recorded. Recording will start as soon as the water first touch the porous
pavement and will stop when free water is no longer present on the porous surface.
=
2
where:
This chapter comprises the presentation, analysis, and interpretation of the data
and results gathered through proper testing, with and without Alkali-resistant Glass (ARG)
mechanical properties of the porous concrete mix, tested in accordance with ASTM
Standards for Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength, and Infiltration Rate of Porous
Concrete.
specimens: denoted as Control for Control Specimen, ARG-1 for Specimen with 1%
ARG, ARG-3 for Specimen with 3% ARG, ARG-5 for Specimen with 5% ARG, F23-1
for Specimen with 1 % F23, F23-3 for Specimen with 3% F23, and F23-5 for Specimen
From the testing of construction materials prior to the design of porous concrete
Based on the (1: 0.45: 4.5) design of the porous concrete mix, it is calculated that
concrete beams, and 3 pavement samples. 196g (1%), 587g (3%), or 978g (5%) of either
Test (MPa), Flexural Strength Test (MPa), and Infiltration Rate Test (cm /sec) of
specimens Control, ARG-1, ARG-3, ARG-5, F23-1, F23-3, and F23-5 were
Table 7 shows the data and results of the control specimen with respect to property
testing in accordance with ASTM C39, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength
of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM C78, Standard Test Method for Flexural
Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third- Point Loading), and ASTM 1701,
In accordance with DPWH Blue Book Item 311, Portland Cement Concrete
attained only 59.7% and 87.1%, respectively. This means that all samples failed to attain
the required strength of Item 311. But, in comparison to the specifications proposed by
Tennis, et al, 2004, for porous concrete, which is 3.5 - 28 MPa for compression, and 1 -
3.8 MPa for flexure, the results more than satisfied the criteria both for compressive and
Table 8 shows the data and results of specimen ARG-1 1% ARG with respect
to property testing in accordance with ASTM C39, Standard Test Method for
Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third- Point Loading),
and ASTM 1701, Standard Test Method for Infiltration Rate of In Place Pervious
Concrete.
Contrary to what is expected, in comparison to the Control Mix, the physical and
fiber was introduced to the mix, which means that the required compressive and flexural
strength of Item 311 in the DPWH Blue Book was not met. However, it can be noted that
the results still comply with the recommended values by Tennis et al, (2004).
Table 9 shows the data and results of specimen ARG-3 3% ARG with respect
to property testing in accordance with ASTM C39, Standard Test Method for
Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third- Point Loading),
and ASTM 1701, Standard Test Method for Infiltration Rate of In Place Pervious
Concrete.
The physical and mechanical properties of the porous concrete mix with 3% ARG
further decreased, which again means that the DPWH Blue Book requirement for
concrete pavement was not met. And although the compressive and flexural strength of
the specimen still falls within the range specified by Tennis for porous concrete pavement,
the infiltration rate is lower than the proposed rate by Tennis et al, (2004).
Table 10 shows the data and results of specimen ARG-5-5% ARG with respect
to property testing in accordance with ASTM C39, Standard Test Method for
Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third- Point Loading),
and ASTM 1701, Standard Test Method for Infiltration Rate of In Place Pervious
Concrete.
Again, the results were lower than the Control Mix, but in comparison with the
results of the mix with 3% ARG, the compressive strength of the specimen is lower but
the flexural strength and infiltration rate of the specimen are slightly higher. This means
that the increase in the amount of fiber from 3% to 5% results to the fiber acting as a
Table 10 shows the data and results of specimen F23-1 -1% Fibrin 23 with respect to
property testing in accordance with ASTM C39, Standard Test Method for Compressive
Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM C78, Standard Test Method for
Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third- Point Loading), and ASTM
1701, Standard Test Method for Infiltration Rate of In Place Pervious Concrete.
of the specimen decreased compared to the Control Mix, which means that the values
are also below the range specified by Item 311 of the DPWH Blue Book. However, all
Table 12 shows the data and results of specimen F23-3 3% Fibrin 23 with
respect to property testing in accordance with ASTM C39, Standard Test Method for
Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third- Point Loading),
and ASTM 1701, Standard Test Method for Infiltration Rate of In Place Pervious
Concrete.
Compared to the Control Specimen, all three properties were lower, which means
that the DPWH-Bluebook specifications were not met. Compared to specimen F23-1
1% Fibrin 23, the compressive strength and infiltration rate decreased while the flexural
strength slightly increased. All three properties satisfy the proposed criteria by Tennis et
al, (2004)
Table 13 shows the data and results of specimen F23-5 5% Fibrin 23, with
respect to property testing in accordance with ASTM C39, Standard Test Method for
Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third- Point Loading),
and ASTM 1701, Standard Test Method for Infiltration Rate of In Place Pervious
Concrete.
Again, all three properties are lower compared to the Control Specimen. In
comparison to specimen F23-3 3% Fibrin 23, the compressive and flexural strengths
are lower, but the infiltration rate is higher. This means that the 5% addition rate of fiber
produces interconnection of voids facilitating flow, however, since the fibers are very
short, it failed to provide flexural reinforcements, unlike the ARG. The three properties of
the specimen F23-5 still passes the specifications set by Tennis for porous concrete
pavement.
Based on the experimental results gathered, the following analyses are derived:
Porous Concrete
Porous Concrete
For the compressive strength of the porous concrete cylinders, a column chart is
adopted to show the strengths attained by specimens with and without fiber, and also
adopted as the graphical basis to clearly show the trend of the compressive strength when
fiber is introduced to the mix. A plot between the compressive strengths versus the fiber
As more fiber, both for Fibrin 23 and ARG, was introduced to the mix, the
compressive strength of the specimens continues to drop. This is because the more fiber
added to the mix, the more volume it occupies, which means that the volume of voids
increases as more fiber is added. And since the formula to compute the capacity of the
specimen due to compressive strength is P = FA, the more area reduced by voids, the
lower the compressive capacity of the specimen. But all specimens, including those with
reduced compressive strength due to the addition of fiber, still falls within the
Porous Concrete
Porous Concrete
For the flexural strength of the porous concrete specimens, a column chart is
adopted to show the strengths attain of specimens with and without fiber, and also
adopted as the graphical basis to clearly show the trend of the flexural strength when
more fiber is introduced to the mix. A plot between the flexural strengths versus the fiber
For ARG-reinforced Porous Concrete. The start of the graph, from Specimen
ARG-1 to ARG-3, the trend of flexural strength is similar to the trend of the compressive
strength due to the same reason. As more fiber was introduced to the mix, the strength
of the specimen continues to drop, due to the accumulation of more voids from the
addition of more fibers. But the trend goes upward when the percent of fiber added was
5%, this is because the fiber are now starting to be interconnected with each other, they
are starting to reinforced the porous concrete mix, unlike in the 1% and 3% wherein the
fiber only contributes to the void content of the specimen. This trend became possible
because the mix is a porous concrete mix, not a regular concrete mix. Unlike in normal
concrete mix, porous concrete mix has little to no sand that could have served as mortar
that will bind the fiber together with the concrete. But all specimens, including those that
decreases due to the addition of ARG fiber, still falls within the recommended flexural
For Fibrin 23-reinforced Porous Concrete. The trend continues to go down even
when fiber content is 5%. This is due to the difference in length of ARG fiber and Fibrin
23 fiber. Fibrin 23 is a lot shorter (12 mm) than ARG fiber (50 mm), resulting for the Fibrin
Porous Concrete
Porous Concrete
For the infiltration rate of the porous concrete specimens, a column chart is
adopted to show the strengths attain of specimens with and without fiber, and also
adopted as the graphical basis to clearly show the trend of the infiltration rate when more
fiber is introduced to the mix. A plot between the infiltration rates versus the fiber content
For ARG-reinforced Porous Concrete. The start of the graph, from Specimen ARG-
1 to ARG-3, the trend of infiltration rate is similar to the trend of the compressive and
flexural strength. If strength decreases when more voids are present in the mix, it is not
necessarily the same for the infiltration rate. This is because synthetic fiber is an
impermeable material, it only allows water to flow above it. Therefore, instead of just
percolating to the specimen, the water is blocked by the synthetic fibers, thus slowing the
rate of water to infiltrate to the specimen. But similar in flexural strength, the trend goes
upward when the percent of fiber added was 5%, this is because the impermeable layers
which are the fibers, are now starting to connect with each other, thus bridging the path
of water. But all specimens, except specimen ARG-3, falls within the recommended
For Fibrin 23-reinforced Porous Concrete. The trend is similar to the ARG-
reinforced Porous Concrete. The only difference is that the infiltration rates of the Fibrin
23-reinforced have higher value than ARG-reinforced. This is due to the thinner and
shorter length of Fibrin 23, allowing water to flow easier and reduce ponding of water
compare to ARG.
This chapter evaluates the properties of Fibrin 23 reinforced porous concrete and
ARG fiber reinforced porous concrete in accordance with the DPWH Standards and
Specifications (Blue Book), ASTM C39, C78 and C1701 to the general procedures of
different property testing of materials. This chapter assesses whether the Fibrin 23 and
Alkali- resistant Glass Fiber as an additive will give a substantial contribution acting as
reinforcement to the Porous Concrete. This chapter also covers the findings, conclusions
a. Flexural Strength: The highest Flexural Strength among the Fibrin 23 reinforced
porous concrete was obtained in Specimen F23-1 1%, while among the ARG
Flexural Strength. Comparing the two, Specimen ARG-5 (with 5% ARG) showed
higher Flexural Strength, but is also lower than the Control Specimen.
reinforced porous concrete was obtained in Specimen F23-1 1%, while among
the ARG fiber reinforced porous concrete, Specimen ARG-1 1% also registered
the highest Compressive Strength. Overall, Specimen F23-1 (with 1% Fibrin 23)
a. Void Content: The mix proportion adopted (1: 0.45: 4.05) produced an
21.91%. This value is within the specified limits for porous concrete which is
15-25%.
5% while among the ARG fiber reinforced porous concrete, was Specimen
ARG-5 5% also. Overall, Specimen F23-5 (with 5% Fibrin 23) was found to
5.2. Conclusions
The following are the conclusions in this research study on the Effects of Fibrin 23 and
The compressive and flexural strength of the porous concrete mix without fibers
was 14.4 MPa and 3.9 MPa, respectively. This is only 59.7% and 87.1%, of the
DPWH Blue Book requirements for Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (Item
pavement of 24.1 MPa and 4.5 MPa, respectively. However, in comparison to the
specifications proposed by Tennis et al, 2004, for porous concrete, which is 3.5 to
28 MPa for compression, and 1 to 3.8 MPa for flexure, the results more than
satisfied the criteria both for compressive and flexural strengths, as well as with
As more fiber was introduced to the mix, the compressive strength of the
specimens continue to decrease. This is because the addition of fibers add more
fiber content since the length of the fibers (12 mm) is not sufficient to provide
flexural reinforcement. For the infiltration rate, there was a decrease with the
addition of fiber until 3%, but slightly increased at 5%, implying that a path for water
As more fiber was introduced to the mix, the compressive strength of the
specimens continue to decrease. This is because the addition of fibers add more
compression. Similarly, the flexural strength decreases with the increasing addition
of fiber from 1% to 3%, but there was an increase at the addition of 5%, which
implies that flexural reinforcement is provided at this rate. For the infiltration rate,
5%, implying that a path for water was established at this addition rate of fiber,
Comparing the data gathered, the Compressive and Flexural strength of ARG-
reinforced porous concrete are slightly higher than those of the Fibrin 23-reinforced
5.2.1 Addition of ARG fibers is considered effective in terms of Permeability and Flexure
5.2.2 Addition of fibers significantly reduced the cracking and shrinkage of the porous
concrete.
5.2.3 Overall, the addition of fibers up to 5% fiber content in the porous concrete reduced
but still passing the criteria for porous concrete pavement according to Tennis, et
al. However, it did not meet the requirements set by the DPWH Standards and
5.3 Recommendations
1. The analysis of the Fiber- reinforced porous concrete has not yet taken into
account the crack resistance property of the specimen. The researchers have
observed the minimized cracking and deflection during flexural strength test. From
2. The method of mixing can affect the quality of porous concrete. It is suggested and
3. The test results for the Infiltration Rate Test and Flexural Strength test are based
as per ASTM C 1701 and C 78. The trend of results from the graph suggests that
higher fiber content than 5% may lead to higher infiltration rate or permeability and
reinforced porous concrete using Fibrin 23 or ARG fibers to use higher than 5%
fiber content in order to see if it would exhibit higher permeability and flexural
strength.
4. The future researchers may consider the use other synthetic fibers for study
involving fiber reinforced porous concrete to observe whether the Fibrin 23, ARG
or other synthetic fibers has good and optimal effects as an additive and
5. The calculated void content of the control sample was 21.91%, which is still in the
15-25%. The researchers suggest to add more sand in the design mix to increase