This correspondence paper disagrees with the conclusions of a previously published paper that introduced research integrating multiple disciplines. While the initial paper is applauded, this correspondence argues against some of the findings or conclusions presented in the earlier work. In conclusion, the correspondence expresses disagreement without providing further details on the point of contention.
This correspondence paper disagrees with the conclusions of a previously published paper that introduced research integrating multiple disciplines. While the initial paper is applauded, this correspondence argues against some of the findings or conclusions presented in the earlier work. In conclusion, the correspondence expresses disagreement without providing further details on the point of contention.
This correspondence paper disagrees with the conclusions of a previously published paper that introduced research integrating multiple disciplines. While the initial paper is applauded, this correspondence argues against some of the findings or conclusions presented in the earlier work. In conclusion, the correspondence expresses disagreement without providing further details on the point of contention.