Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Pack EGCE 418
Course Pack EGCE 418
Course Documents
Foundation Design
Binod Tiwari, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
1
Civil & Environmental Engineering Department
Table of Contents
Page No.
1. Typical Syllabus 1
4. Sub-soil Exploration 55
Text Book
Principles of Foundation Engineering by Braja M. Das, 7th Edition, 2011, CENGAGE L
Publishers, ISBN 9780495668107.
Reference Materials
Handouts, website URLs, visuals, and other materials will be provided during class or
posted on Blackboard.
Foundation Analysis and Design by Bowles, 5E, McGraw Hill (1996).
Foundation Design Principles and Practices by Coduto, 2E, Prentice Hall (2001).
Engineering Manual for Retaining Walls and Abutments by Kim et al., Virginia Tech
(1991).
Engineering Manual for Shallow Foundations by Tan et al., Virginia Tech (1991).
Engineering Manual for Driven Piles by Ooi et al., Virginia Tech (1991).
Office Hours
Monday 12:00 15:00 Wednesday 12:00 13:00
As long as the office door is open, please feel free to walk in and consult. However, phone and
email appointments are encouraged.
Course Description
Design of footings and retaining walls, Mat and pile foundation for structures, Design project to
standards of professional practice using latest codes and standards, Consideration for safety,
reliability, and cost.
Class Project
Scheduled Exams
There will be two mid-term exams. No make up exams will be conducted. However, if one
misses a midterm exam for any university approved reasons, weight of the other midterm
exam will be increased. However, students should inform the instructor in written well on
time to get approval for such reasons. Missing of exams for non-approved reasons
counts as zero score. The final exam will be comprehensive and will cover the contents
covered in the entire class.
Grading Policy
The final letter grade will be computed using the following criteria:
Homework/Quizzes 20%
Midterm Exam I (September 15, 2010) 20%
Midterm Exam II (November 1, 2010) 20%
Final Exam (December 15, 2010, 17:00 18:50) 30%
Project 10%
Letter Grades
A (> 97%)
+ -
A (93 96.9%) A (90 92.9 %)
B (87 89.9%)
+ -
B (83 86.9%) B (80 82.9 %)
C (77 79.9%)
+ -
C (73 76.9%) C (70 72.9 %)
D (67 69.9%)
+ -
D (63 66.9%) D (60 62.9%)
F (< 60%)
Honor Code
California State University, Fullerton's Honor Code explained in UPS 300.021 applies to
all works performed in this class including homework, quizzes, and examinations.
Students should strictly follow those codes.
This is a professional course. A learning environment will be created in each class for
motivated students; therefore professional conduct is expected of all participants.
Professional conduct extends to use of cell phones, personal computers, iPods and
PDAs during lecture. Students violating such professional conducts are subject to
expulsion from the class.
Drop Policy
The Fall 2010 Schedule contains the University Regulations and Deadlines for dropping
this course. Students should note that the department stamp and/or department chairs
signature is also required in addition to instructors signature to drop the course.
1. Know the safe evacuation routes for your specific building and floor.
2. Know the evacuation assembly areas for your building.
EMERGENCY CALLS
DIAL 9-1-1
All campus phones and cell phones on campus reach the University Police
Department
Index properties are the characteristics of the soil that indicate its type and composition,
and provide indicators of probable engineering behavior. Most importantly, index property
tests are used to classify soil according to various soil classification systems, one of which
is the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The USCS provides a basis for common
technical communication between designers when referring to soils/geomaterials. Particle
size analysis and Atterberg Limits are two very important index properties of the soil.
Particle size analyses are used to determine the relative proportions of soil particles of
various sizes, in terms of percentage of the total dry weight. These tests are conducted by
mechanical sieving and/or sedimentation i.e. hydrometer analysis.
Grain Sizes
Soil grain sizes are divided into two broad classes: coarse and fine. The definitions of each
type are given below.
Hydrometer Analysis
Hydrometer analysis is done to measure the actual proportion of particles smaller than
0.075 mm. Following equation is used for the analysis.
18. L
D .
w (G s 1) t
Where,
w = Density water = Viscosity of water
D = Diameter of soil particle L = Distance traveled at time t
g g.sec
w = , = , L = cm, t = min, and D = mm
cm 3 cm 2
30. L
D .
w (G s 1) t
L
D K. , where
t
30.
Where, K
w (G s 1)
Gs is more or less fixed for a soil type, and varies with the temperature of water. We can
calculate K using the data shown in the table 2. Therefore, we can calculate D if we measure
L and t for the specific temperature.
Data is interpreted in a plot of percent finer versus logarithm of sieve size opening that is
referred to as the Grain Size Distribution Curve. Figure 1 shows a typical grain size
distribution curve for a coarse-grained soil. From this plot D10, D30, and D60 are determined
and then the Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) and Coefficient of Gradation (Cc) are computed.
Coefficient of Uniformity
Coefficient of curvature (Cc) is a parameter that describes the curvature of the grain size
curve. It is defined as:
2
D30
Cc
D10 D60
Cc 1 indicates that the soil grains between D60 and D10 are very similar in size.
Soils are natural materials therefore there are an infinite number of possible grain size
curves. Figure 2 shows a few examples of the grain size curve shapes that are often
encountered.
Soils are occurred in nature in a 3- phase- system: soil solid, water, and air. It is necessary
to understand the relationship between these phases to evaluate the behavior of soil.
Volume Relationship
Ws (1 w)
Vv =
Void ratio (e) = , V
Vs = d (1 w)
G (1 w)
Vv s w
Porosity (n) = 1 e
V G
d s w
Vw 1 e
Degree of saturation (S) = Gs w Se
Vv
(G e) w
sat s
n 1 e
e=
1 n d Gs w (1 n)
Gs w (1 n)(1 w)
e
n= sat Gs w (1 n) n w
1 e
n
w
Gs (1 n)
d d ,min d ,max
Dr 100%
d ,max d ,min d
Useful Hints:
Gs may be assumed when needed (Typically sand = 2.65 and clay = 2.7).
The expression: S e Gs w can be used as a check or shortcut for many problems.
V or Vs may be assumed to be equal to one (1) if no specific sample information is given.
Always draw a phase diagram as if it were a free body diagram of the soil (ie, show all
knowns and unknowns).
emax and emin represent the soil in its loosest and densest states, respectively, and are
determined using ASTM standard tests in the laboratory.
Relative Density
Relative Density (Dr) is used to indicate in-situ denseness of granular materials such as sand
and gravel.
emax e
Dr 100 %
emax emin
Where,
emax = Void ratio of the soil in loosest state emin = Void ratio of the soil in densest state
e = in-situ void ratio
Theoretically Dr varies from 0% to 100%. But Dr ranges from 20% to 85% in practice.
Fine grained soils that have clay minerals can be remolded without crumble at the presence
of water. State of fine grained soil (known as consistency) varies with the amount of water
in it. Attergerg was the first person to describe such consistency of soil. Depending on the
moisture content, the behavior of soil can be divided into four major states solid, semi
solid, plastic, and liquid. Shown in figure 4 are the consistency stages of the soil specimen.
Physical State
Slurry
Liquid Liquid Limit Water content at the boundary
between a liquid and a plastic. Also the lower
limit of viscous soil flow.
Plastic
Semisolid
The limits of those states are called consistency limits. There are three consistency limits,
which are explained below:
These limits are called Atterberg limits. In other words, Atterberg limits are the limits of
consistency of a soil as defined by water contents that are the boundaries between soil
physical states. It is specified by ASTM D 4318.
Figure 5 Chart showing the decrease in shear strength with water content
Plastic Limit
The water content at which a soil begins to crumble when rolled by hand into a 1/8 (3.18
mm) diameter threads is the plastic limit.
Shrinkage Limit
The moisture content at which the volume of the soil mass ceases to change is defined as
shrinkage limit.
PI LL PL
Plasticity of the clay is defined by the value of PI. Plasticity index depends on the clay sized
fraction and type of clay mineral.
Usual Range: 0 LI 1.
The Liquidity Index is an indication of the consistency of a soil in its natural state (at the
natural water content, wn).
Table 7 Range of Atterberg Limit values for some common clay minerals
(after Mitchell 2005)
When wn PL, the soil is near the optimum moisture content for compaction.
Where
Cc - the compression index, (about 30 % reliability).
Note
These correlations are only for natural soil, not the compacted soil
Atterberg Limits are fundamental to the USCS soil classification system. Remember
that the USCS is a functional classification system, meaning that the group symbols and
group names have specific meaning in terms of engineering behavior.
Activity
Activity of a soil is an index of the type of clay mineral and has been correlated to
engineering behavior such as the shrink-swell behavior. Activity, A, is defined as follows:
PI (%)
A
% clay fraction (< 2 m)
The percent of clay fraction is determined by hydrometer analysis. Activity of the clay is an
indicator of its activeness (Table 8).
USCS System
The USCS uses symbols for the particular size group:
G Gravel particles retained on #4 sieve (4.75 mm)
S- Sand particles passing #4 sieve, but retained on # 200 sieve (0.075 mm)
M- Silt particles passing # 200 sieve
C- Clay particles passing # 200 sieve
These are combined with other symbols with expression on gradation characteristics
W- Well graded
P- Poorly graded
And, plasticity characteristics
H High plasticity L- Low plasticity O- Organic matter
AASHTO classification classifies soil into 7 major groups: A-1 through A-7.
A-1 A-3 : Granular or coarse grained soil
A-4 A-7 : Silty clay or fine grained soil
Silty and clayey soils can be located in a plasticity chart as shown in the figure 8.
A group index value (GI) is appended in parentheses to the main group to provide a measure
of quality of a soil as highway sub grade material. The group index is given as:
Application
Estimation of the quantity of underground seepage water under various hydraulic
conditions
Quantification of water during pumping for underground construction
Stability analysis of slopes, earth dams, and earth retaining structures.
Velocity of flow, k i
Where,
k = Coefficient of Permeability or Hydraulic Conductivity of soil
A = Cross-sectional area of the flow channel
Intrinsic permeability
The parameter k is a special case for flow of water through soil at a fairly constant
temperature. However, permeability can vary if the fluid is not water, such as in petroleum
recovery, or the temperature other than 200C. The intrinsic permeability, k, is defined as:
k
k'
where,
= dynamic viscosity and is the unit weight of the fluid.
The smallest particles in a soil mixture control the permeability of the soil mass. The fine
contents of a soil have a greater influence on permeability than does density. In rocks, the
presence of fractures controls permeability.
Permeability is also dependent on the scale of the problem at hand. Direct measurements
must account for presence of contrasting permeability inclusions within a soil mass. An
Some typical values of permeability for soils are shown in table 10.
a) Hazens equation
This equation is appropriate for clean, saturated, poorly graded sands (SP) with C u < 5, and
0.1 mm < D10 < 0.3.
k = C D102 [cm/s]
where,
C = 100, and
D10 = effective grain size [cm]
or
C = 1, and
D10 = effective grain size [mm]
This equation does not account for void ratio or grain shape. This equation is empirical,
which means it was derived from experimental data. The standard error in the correlation
is unknown which means we have no way of knowing the reliability of this relationship for
computing permeability. This means we need to use Hazen's equation with caution.
b) Kozeny-Carman equation
The Kozney-Carmen equation accounts for each of the fundamental factors that influence
permeability of soils: void ratio, grain size and shape (through specific surface), amount of
fines (through specific surface), degree of saturation, flow channel conditions and fluid
properties. This equation has a theoretical basis but does contain empirical elements. It
works well for sands and gravels where laminar flow exists. It is not appropriate for clays
4 to 6 15.0
6 to 8 21.2
8 to 10 27.5
10 to 16 38.9
16 to 20 60.0
20 to 30 85.2
30 to 40 120.5
40 to 50 169.0
50 to 70 239.0
70 to 100 339.2
100 to 140 479.7
140 to 200 680.7
Chapuiss Equation
0.7825
2 e3
k (cm / s ) 2.4622 D10
1 e
D10 should be in mm.
Seepage
Darcys law is applicable when flow of water is in one direction. In real world problems,
seepage occurs in all three dimensions. Solution for 3D problems is complicated and needs
advanced mathematical calculations. In many cases, 3D problems are simplified to 2D and
seepage flow is calculated accordingly.
2h 2h
0
x 2 y 2
This equation is called Laplace Equation.
In figure 9,
q H
q h
nf nd
Seepage Calculation Using Flow Net
If our flow nets are going to have the properties of the lines mentioned above, we need
to draw them in a certain way.
b nf
q k .H .$. where, $
l nd
q k .H .$ and Q = q. L
For k x k y ,
ky
we make horizontal scale = x vertical Scale
kx
and plot the structure. Then we follow the same procedure. This gives,
H .n f
q k x .k y .
nd
' u
When seepage pressure is so high that effective stress is zero, sand boiling or quick sand
occurs. This can be checked at site easily.
At sand boiling,
z ' ic z w
Where,
ic = critical hydraulic gradient for sand boiling to occur
Therefore,
'
ic
w
Diameter = 2.80 inches Height = 6.00 inches Weight (moist) = 2.694 lbs
Weight (dry) = 2.405 lbs
What is the group name and group symbol for this soil?
Table 1 Typical value of drained friction angles for sand and silt (Das, 2006)
For sand and gravel, c = 0 (they are called cohesion less soil)
For normally consolidated and remolded clays, c = 0
For over consolidated clays, c = f (OCR)
We can draw Mohr circle for the stress condition shown above as shown in figure 3.
Figure 3 Mohr circle for the case shown in figure 2 (Das, 2006)
' '
1 ' 3 ' tan 2 (45 0 ) 2c' tan( 45 0 )
2 2
Here, c and are the effective shear strength parameters.
Strength of soil
FS
Shear stress to soil
Laboratory Measurement
There are different methods to measure shear strength of soil in laboratory.
Calculations
1. Calculate dry unit weight of the specimen.
Wd
Dry unit weight =
V
2. Calculate void ratio.
Gd w
e= 1
d
Normal Load
'
Area
Shear Force
Area
For clays, rate of strain should be very slow. Rate of strain is determined from
consolidation data.
When we conduct direct shear test to measure the friction angle due to interaction
between foundation material and soil, is replaced by , and c is replaced by ca
(adhesion).
Figure 8 Initial and final principal stresses at triaxial specimen (Budhu, 2006)
Calculations
L
Axial strain = a
L
V
Volumetric strain = v
V
Ac (1 v )
New area after deformation = A
(1 a )
Ac = Area after consolidation
1 ' 3 ' d
Plot d vs. a for at least 3 tests (figure 9).
Plot v vs. a for at least 3 tests.
Plot Mohr circle based on 1 and 3 at failure.
Plot Mohr circle for failure for all 3 confining stresses.
Make a straight line, which is tangent to all Mohrs circles.
This is failure envelope. Get c and from the line (figure 10).
Figure 13 Mohr circle plotted from a CU triaxial test data (Budhu, 2006)
Nature of change of pore water pressure for OC clay is different than that in NC clays as
shown in figure 14.
As drainage is not permitted and consolidation is not necessary, this test is very
quick, and also referred as Q-test.
As Uc = B. 3 and Ud = A . d
Total u = B. 3 + A . d
u = B. 3 + A . (1 - 3)
This test is common in clayey soils.
Steps for sample preparation and saturation are same as in the other tests. But the
sample is not consolidated in this test.
After the sample is saturated, it is sheared at higher strain rate.
L, d, and u are recorded.
The test is continued until the principal stress ratio shows ultimate value or 20%
axial strain.
Calculations
Plot d vs a for at least 3 tests.
Plot u vs a for at least 3 tests.
Plot 1/3 vs a, and p vs q . p = (1 + 3)/2 and q = (1 - 3)/2
Plot Mohr circle based on 1 and 3 at failure and 1 and 3 at failure. They should
give the same d value.
Plot Mohr circle for failure for all 3 confining stresses. All tests should give same d,
as 3 is same for all tests although 3 is different.
Make a straight line, which is tangent to all Mohrs circles. This gives c u with a
horizontal line, i.e. u = 0. Therefore this test is called = 0 test (figure 15).
cu = d/2
c. Unconfined Compression Test
This is a special type of UU test used for saturated clays, where 3 = 0.
The specimen is not enclosed into a rubber membrane, but is kept uncovered.
Axial load is applied rapidly to cause failure.
The procedure is as follows:
Get three trimmed soil specimens.
Measure dimensions of the specimens.
Measure weights of the specimens.
Load the samples into the unconfined compression device. They should be placed
in between two platens.
Lower the upper platen slowly, just to make contact with the top of the soil
specimen.
Set vertical displacement dial gauge and loading proving ring dial gauge to zero.
Lower the upper platen at the speed of about 0.5%/min.
Record the load and displacement dial gauge readings. Usually the readings are
taken at every 0.01 inch of displacement.
2. (a) The effective stress strength parameters for a saturated clay soil are c' = 180 psf and
' = 25. The value of the major principal effective stress at failure is 2130 psf. What is
the value of the minor principal effective stress at failure?
and b) long-term condition? Assume the soil above the ground water level is saturated.
Consider z = 71.1 kPa and x = 5.1 kPa
0.5
Ko = (1 sincs) (OCR)
Sub-soil Exploration
In nature, soil below the ground is heterogeneous and stratified.
To design the foundation safely, it is necessary to know the type of soil strata
with depth.
For this purpose, subsoil exploration is done. The main objectives of the subsoil
exploration can be summarized as,
To determine the nature of soil and depth-wise stratification.
To obtain the disturbed or undisturbed specimens for geotechnical
analysis
To know the depth of bedrock.
To conduct in-situ tests for the measurement of shear strength and
permeability.
To determine the position of ground water table.
Proper planning of subsoil exploration program is essential to have efficient
investigation.
Methods of Boring
4. Percussion Drilling
This method is used in drilling hard rock.
A heavy drill bit is raised and lowered to chop the rock.
Chopped soil is brought up by the force of circulating water.
Figure 5 A drilling rod with split spoon sampler is being lowered down (Das, 2006)
This N value should be corrected for actually energy applied to the hammer as opposed
to the theoretically calculated energy. The N value is corrected with various influencing
factors to get N60 (standard penetration number corrected for field condition) value,
as shown by the following equation.
N H B S R
N 60
60
Where H = Hammer efficiency (%)
B = Bore hole diameter correction
S = Sampler correction
R = Rod length correction
Shown in table 2 are those factors for various situations.
Likewise,
' 27.1 0.3 N1,60 0.00054 N1,60 2
1
Where, N1,60 C N N 60 and C N 9.78 (0 in kN/m2)
0'
0.689
N
OCR 0.193 '60
v0
Table 4 Approximate relationship between N1,60 and relative density (Das, 2006)
Vane shear tests are done to measure cu of soft to medium cohesive clays.
Shear vanes consist of 4 thin, equally spaced steel plates welded to a steel torque
rod.
Equipment is pushed into the soil and torque is applied at top.
Soil is rotated at constant speed.
T = Ms + Me + Me
Where,
Figure 10 Derivation of equatuion for : a) resisting moment of shear force, and b) variations in shear strength mobilization (Das, 2006)
d
M s ( .d .h).cu .
2
Assuming uniform mobility of undrained shear strength at the top and bottom of the device,
1 .d 2 1 .d 3
Me ( .d ).cu = ( ).cu
2 4 2 4
1 .d 3 .d 2 .h 1 d
Now, T ( ).cu .cu = .d 2 cu (h )
2 4 2 2 4
2.T
Therefore, cu
d
.d 2 (h )
4
Table 5 Recommended dimensions of field vane (Das, 2006)
Vane shear test always gives a higher shear strength than the triaxial test results.
Therefore, the results should be factored for safe design.
According to Bjerrum, cu design = . cu vane shear, where depends on PI, LL and e.
Pressuremeter Test
Dilatometer Test
#1
Shown on the attached figure is the boring log (ABH-0809) for a site in Papua (Irian Jaya),
Indonesia. At the location of the boring, an excavation will be made to a final grade elevation of
24 m. There will be a drainage system installed so that the final water table will not exceed the
final grade elevation. The saturated unit weights of the SM and SP soils were measured to be
3 3
approximately 18.8 kN/m and the moist unit weights were 18.5 kN/m . The saturated unit weights
3
of the CH and ML soils were measured to be about 18.2 kN/m and the moist unit weights were
3
measured to be 18.0 kN/m .
(a) Plot the total stress, pore water pressure, and effective stress for +24 m MSL to -20 m MSL
prior to excavation.
(b) Plot the total stress, pore water pressure, and effective stress for +24 m MSL to -20 m MSL
after excavation.
Types of foundation
Mat Foundation
Figure 1 Different type of shallow foundations
Figure 6 Various modes of foundation failure for different relative depths and densities
Df
In figure 8,
Zone I (ABJ) is an elastic zone. Angles BAJ = ABJ =
Zone II (AJE and BJD) are radial shear zones, made with spiral curved surface.
Zone III (AEG and BDF) are Rankines passive zones.
Angles AGE = GAE = FBD = BFD = 450 /2
1. Pp due to
a b c
2. Pp due to c
Pp c' H K c
This force is also acting vertical
3. Pp due to q
Pp q H K q
This force is also acting vertical
1
Pp H 2 K c' H K c q H K q
2
1
or Pp (b tan ' ) K c' (b tan ' ) K c q (b tan ' ) K q
2
2
Substituting it to equation (1)
1 b
qu b tan 2 K c' tan ' K c q tan K q c' tan ' tan '
2 2
1 b
Or qu b tan 2 K tan 'c' tan ' K c c' tan ' q tan ' K q
2 2
1 1
Or qu b ( tan 2 K tan ' ) c' tan ' ( K c 1) q tan ' K q
2 2
Therefore, qu b N c' N c q N q
2 2
c ' c' tan ' tan '
3 3
1
qu ' B N 'c ' N c ' q N q '
2
For square Footing, qu ' 0.4 B N '1.3 c ' N c ' q N q '
Figure 10 Effect of the location of ground water table on the bearing capacity of shallow foundation
= for N term
1
= average for N term average ( D ' ( B D))
B
Factor of Safety
qu qu
FS Therefore, q allowable
qallowable FS
W( D L ) W F W S
Generally, qu
A
Where, W(D+L) = Dead and live load
Wf = Weight of footing
Ws = Weight of soil above footing
A = Area of the base of the footing
Many cases, soil is considered same as concrete and as the foundation already has the
weight of soil and footing, net ultimate load is calculated as,
W( D L ) qu ( net )
qu ( net ) qu q and q allowable( net )
A FS
Replace with F
Replace with F
Replace with F
Vesics equation
N 2( N q 1) tan '
Hansens equation
N 1.5( N q 1) tan '
Q 6M
q m ax Q = Vertical load and M = Moment on foundation
BL B 2 L
Q 6M
q m in
BL B 2 L
M
e
Q
Q 6e
Therefore, q max (1 )
BL B
Q 6e
qmin (1 )
BL B
4Q
q max
3L ( B 2e)
Qult
Qall
FS
Qult = qu A
For calculation follow the same method as explained for one way eccentricity.
Case 1
1 1
eB B and eL L
6 6
The effective area is shown in the figure
1 3eB 3eL
A' B1 L1 where, B1 B(1.5 ) and L1 L(1.5 )
2 B L
A'
Effective length is larger of B1 and L1 and Effective width is equals to B '
'
L
Case 2
1 1
0 eB B and eL L
6 2
The effective area is shown in the figure.
1
A' B( L1 L2 ) L1 and L2 can be determined from the following figure.
2
A'
B '
, whichever is larger.
L1orL2
Effective length (L) is larger of L1 and L2 .
Case 3
1 1
0 eB B and eL L
2 6
The effective area is shown in the figure.
1
A' L( B1 B2 ) B1 and B2 can be determined from the following figure.
2
A'
B
'
Effective length (L) is L .
L
Case 4
1 1
eB B and eL L
6 6
The effective area is shown in the figure.
B2 and L2 can be determined by using EL/L curve sloping upward and downwards
respectively.
1
A' L2 B ( L L2 )( B1 B2 )
2
A'
B
'
Effective length (L) is L .
L
Case 5
Circular Foundation
A'
B
'
2. SPT result per depth below the ground is presented below for a foundation construction site.
Load of superstructure above the foundation is shown in the figure. Based on consideration of
3. Please calculate the allowable gross vertical load bearing capacity of foundation for the
following parameters.
8. A shallow foundation shown in the figure below is 4 ft. x 6 ft. in plan and is subjected to a
centric load and a moment. If eB = 0.4 ft, eL = 1.2 ft, and Df = 3 ft, determine the allowable load
1
z q.1
(
R / z ) 2
1
3 /
2
z
We can calculate for different values of R/z (R and z are known for one point, but as
q
R is known, we can even evaluate z for different z). As q is known, we can come up with
the value for one R/z value using the table.
2. At any point
The loading condition is shown in the figure below.
Vertical stress at any point can be calculated using the following equation (Ahlvin and
Ulery,1962)
z q( A' B ' )
Where, A and B are functions of z/R and r/R respectively. They can be calculated from
tables shown below.
Figure 3 Increase in vertical stress at any point below the uniformly loaded circular area
(Das, 2006)
Table 4 Variation of A with z/R and r/R
Table 4 continued
Table 5 continued
To calculate the vertical load at point A, which is right below a corner of the loaded
rectangular area, we can extend Boussinesqs solution.
Where,
I4 is a function of m and n. m = B/z n = L/z
We can get values of I4 from the table and figure for different m and n values.
Table 6 continued..
In most cases, the stress right below the center of the rectangular load is required.
This can be obtained by further simplification of the parameters.
z q.I 5
Where, I5 is a function of m1 and n1.
m1 = L/B and n1 = z/b
where, b = B/2
I5 can be obtained from table for different values of m1 and n1.
Figure 7 Increase in vertical stress below the center of a rectangularly loaded area
(Das, 2006)
Figure 8 Average vertical stress increase due to rectangularly loaded flexible area
1 s
2
S e q0 (B' ) IsI f
Es
Where,
q0 = Net applied pressure in the foundation
s = Poissons ratio of the soil
Es = Average modulus of elasticity of soil below foundation from z=0 to z=4B
B = B/2 for center of foundation and B for the corner of foundation
= Factor that depends on the location where settlement is calculated
1 2 s
Is = Shape factor = F1 F2
1 s
F1 & F2 = f (m, n)
L H
For center of foundation, m' n' 4
B B
2
L H
For corner of foundation, m' n' 1
B B
Es
E s (i ) z
z
Where, Es(i) = Soil modulus of elasticity within a depth z
z = H or 5B, whichever is smaller
1. A flexible circular area is subjected to a uniformly distributed stress of 3 ksf. The diameter
of loaded area is 9.5 ft. Determine the stress increase in the soil mass at a point located
7.5 ft below the center of the loaded area.
2. Figure shown below is a flexible rectangular area. Following parameters are knows:
B1 = 1.2 m B2 = 3m
L1 = 3m L2 = 6m
The area is subjected to a uniform stress of 110 kPa. Please determine the stress
increase from 0 to 5 m. below the center of the area.
3. Figure shown below is a flexible rectangular area. Following parameters are knows:
B1 = 5 ft B2 = 10 ft
L1 = 7 ft L2 = 12 ft
The area is subjected to a uniform stress of 2.5 ksf. Please determine the stress increase
from 0 to 20 ft. below the center of the area.
4. A foundation system is shown in the following figure. Determine the average stress
increase in clay layer below the center of foundation due to the net foundation load of 50
ton.
6.
Consolidation Settlement
All soils settle under load, causing settlement of the structures founded on or within them.
Settlement problems are actually two problems in one both the magnitude and time rate of
settlement should be calculated. If the settlement is not kept to a tolerable limit, the
desired use of structure may be impaired or design life of the structure may be reduced.
Settlements can be uniform or differential, the later is crucial in design.
Total settlement, ST = S c + Ss + Se
Where,
Sc = Primary consolidation settlement
Ss = Secondary consolidation settlement
Se = Elastic (immediate) settlement
For foundations bearing on coarse grained soil, most of the total settlement appears
right after the application of load.
Primary consolidation in coarse grained soil also appears rapidly due to high
permeability.
In case of fine grained soil, primary consolidation, which extends over a long time, is
the main cause of settlement although small amount of elastic settlement
(immediate settlement) is also occurred. In such soils, secondary settlement also
occurs but the magnitude is far less than the primary settlement.
Secondary settlement in organic soil is more than that in the inorganic soil.
Figure 1 Variation of total stress, pore pressure, and effective stress in a doubly drained clay layer (Das, 2006)
In figure 1, = + u
At t = 0, = 0 and at t = , u = 0
The laboratory consolidation curve will give you three patterns of settlement
Stage I = initial compression, which is caused by preloading.
Primary consolidation
Secondary consolidation
b
c
Figure 5 Loading unloading reloading cycle for e-log curve (Das, 2006)
Choose by eye the point of minimum radius of curvature on the e-log curve (point A
in figure 6).
Draw a horizontal line through point A.
Draw a line tangent to the curve at point A.
Bisect the angle made by steps 2 and 3.
Extend the straight line portion of the virgin compression curve until it intersects
the bisecting line from step 4.
The intersection point gives the best estimate of pre-consolidation pressure.
Vv V0 A.H
But, e and Vs
Vs 1 e0 1 e0
AH
Then, Vv = Sc . A = e . Vs = e.
1 e0
Find p.
Measure eo.
Make a horizontal line from e0 and a vertical line from p. They intersect at g.
Empirical equation:
n0
Cc = 0.009 (LL 10) Cc =
371 .747 4.275 n0
Swell Index (Cs)
1 1
C s ( )C c
5 10
Empirical equation:
LL
C s 0.0463 ( )Gs
100
From Terzaghis equation for time rate of pore pressure dissipation (figure 11) with
consolidation,
cv t
Time factor T 2
H dr
k
Where, cv = coefficient of consolidation =
a
w( v )
1 e0
where, av = coefficient of compressibility
2
0.848 .H dr
Therefore, cv
t 90
a) Determine the primary consolidation settlement of the fine grained soil layer when the
tank is full
b) Calculate and plot the settlement-time curve.
zzzz
Figure 1
Table 1
Table 2
2. The foundations supporting two columns of a building are shown in figure 2. An extensive
soil investigation was not carried out and it was assumed in the design of the footing that
the clay layer has an uniform thickness of 1.2 m. Two years after construction, the
building settled with the differential settlement of 10 mm. Walls of the building began
cracking. The doors have not jammed but by measuring the out of vertical distance of
the doors, it is estimated that they would become jammed if the differential settlement
exceeded 24 mm. A subsequent soil investigation showed that the thickness of the clay
layer was not uniform but varies as shown in the figure 1. The owners would like to get an
estimate of the expected total differential settlement and how long it would take before
the doors become jammed. Could you perform those calculations?
Figure 2
3. A bore hole at a site for a proposed building reveals the soil profile as shown in table 3. A
building is to be constructed on this site with its foundation at 2 m below ground level. The
building load is 30 MN and the foundation is rectangular with a width of 10 m and length of 15 m.
A sample of the clay was tested in an oedometer and the results obtained are shown in table 4.
Table 3
Table 4
Calculate the primary consolidation settlement. Assuming that the primary consolidation took 5
years to achieve in the field, calculate the secondary consolidation for the period of 10 years
beyond primary consolidation. Consider cs = one sixth of cc.
Sand Clay
Poissons ratio 0.3 0.5
Youngs Modulus of Elasticity 10 MPa 1 MPa
Effective friction angle 330 -
2. Shown in the figure is cross section of a building frame. The frost level is at 0.7 m below the
ground level. Therefore, it is recommended to locate the depth of the foundation at 1 m depth
below the ground. The total settlement should not exceed 25 mm and the differential settlement
should not exceed 10 mm. Geotechnical investigation revealed the following soil parameters.
Design the appropriate size of footing for the factor of safety of 4.
2. A residual building is to be located at a site with a representative soil strata as shown in the
figure. The loads from all columns are same and size and spacing of the columns are shown
in the figure. Please check whether the size of the mat foundation safely transmits the loads
without excessive settlement or not. Consider the following soil parameters:
sat Poissons ratio 0.5
3
19 kN/m
d
3
18 kN/m
Cu 70 kPa E 1 MPa
3. An office building is to be located at a site with a representative soil strata as shown in the
figure. The loads from two columns of preliminary size 0.3 m x 0.3 m are shown in the figure.
Determine the suitable size of shallow foundation to safely transmit the loads. The total
settlement should not exceed 25 mm and the differential settlement should not exceed 10 mm.
The finished elevation is 0+00 m. Consider the following soil parameters:
Sand Clay
Poissons ratio = 0.3 Poissons ratio = 0.5
Youngs Modulus of Elasticity = 10 MPa Youngs Modulus of Elasticity = 1 MPa
0
Effective friction angle = 33 Undrained shear strength = 55 kPa
3 3
Dry unit weight = 18 kN/m Saturated unit weight = 17.5 kN/m
3
Saturated unit weight = 19 kN/m Coefficient of Consolidation = 0.24
4. Shown in the figure is a plan and cross section of a building frame. The frost level is at 3 ft
below the ground level. Therefore, it is recommended to locate the depth of the foundation at
4 ft. below the ground. Geotechnical investigation revealed the following soil properties:
For sand: = 100 pcf sat = 122 pcf Es = 3200 psi
= 30
0
Poissons ratio = 0.3 c = 0
For Clay: sat = 118 pcf Es = 1200 psi Poissons ratio = 0.5
= 25
0
c = 400 psf e0 = 0.7
Cc = 0.25 Cr or Cs = 0.06 Preconsolidation = 1 ksf
Design the appropriate size of footing for the factor of safety of 6. Consider the bearing
capacity failure criteria only. There is a bed rock right below the clay layer.
For the footing you designed, calculate the total elastic settlement i.e. settlement at the sand
layer and settlement at the clay layer.
5. An office building is to be located at a site with a representative soil strata as shown in the
figure. The loads from two columns of preliminary size 0.3 m x 0.3 m are shown in the figure.
Determine the suitable size of shallow foundation to safely transmit the loads. The total
settlement should not exceed 25 mm and the differential settlement should not exceed 10
mm. The finished elevation is 0+00 m. Consider the following soil parameters:
Sand Clay
Poissons ratio 0.3 0.5
Youngs Modulus of Elasticity 10 MPa 1 MPa
0 -
Effective friction angle 33
3 -
Dry unit weight 18 kN/m
3
Saturated unit weight 19 kN/m 17.5
3
kN/m
Undrained shear strength - 150
kPa
Coefficient of Consolidation - 0.24
Water content - 20%
Specific gravity 2.65 2.7
6. You have to design an appropriate foundation for a 4 story residential building. Plan of the
building is shown in Figure 1. An exploratory boring revealed underground information, which
is presented in Figure 2. The column loads that was calculated based on the prevailing
practice are shown in Table 1. Because of the property line issue, you are required to design
A1 200 80
B1 300 180
C1 300 180
D1 200 80
A2 200 80
B2 300 180
C2 300 180
D2 200 80
A3 200 80
B3 300 180
C3 300 180
D3 200 80
Combined Footing
Under normal condition, the spread and strip footings are economical.
In many cases low bearing capacity of soil warrants larger footing size, but
property line limits the dimension of the footing.
In such situation, we make combined footing for two or more columns and
such types of footings are called combined footings.
Size of the combined footing is determined based on the bearing capacity.
Depending on the shape, combined footings are rectangular, trapezoidal, and
strap.
1. Determine net allowable bearing capacity of soil based on the method you
studied in the spread footing.
2. Determine the area of foundation as,
Q1 Q2
A (1)
q net,allowable
Where, Q1, and Q2 = Column loads
qnet,allowable = Net allowable bearing capacity of soil
The gross bearing capacity of the mat is same as in the spread footing.
1
qu c' N c Fcs Fcd Fci qN q Fqs Fqd Fqi B N Fs Fd Fi
2
Net ultimate bearing capacity of a mat foundation is calculated as,
qnet,u qu q
A suitable safety factor should be chosen to calculate the allowable bearing
capacity. For mats on clay and sand, safety factor of 3 is taken, but minimum
safety factor of 2 is seldom used for clays.
Bearing capacity is calculated exactly in the same way as explained in the
preceding chapters.
If SPT value is known for a granular soil layer, following equation can also be
used,
N B 0.3
2
S
qnet (kPa) 60 ' Fd ( e
0.08 B 25
Where,
Df
Fd = 1 0.33( ) 1.33
B
Se = settlement
Compensated foundation
Net pressure increase in the soil under the mat can be reduced by increasing Df.
This approach is called Compensated Foundation Design.
This method is used when foundations are designed on soft clays.
Deeper basement is made below the higher portion of superstructure and vice
versa to make the pressure distribution uniform.
At fully compensated foundation situation, depth of the foundation is
calculated as,
Q
Df
A
qnet ,u
FS
And Q
.D f
A
ACI 366 (1988) mentions that we need to use conventional rigid method if the c/c
spacing of column is less than 1.75/. Otherwise flexible method should be used.
B1K
4
4 EF I F
Where,
q
K = coefficient of sub-grade reaction = q = load/unit area
= Settlement
EF = Modulus of elasticity of foundation material
B1 h 3
IF = Moment of inertia of the cross-section of the beam =
12
B1 = Width of foundation (strip)
Following steps are followed to design the foundation with conventional rigid method.
U b0 d 0.34 f c ' U = Factored load (MN)
= Reduction factor (0.85)
fc = 28 day compressive strength of concrete (MN/m2)
For English unit
U b0 d (4) f c ' U = Factored load (lb)
fc = 28 day compressive strength of concrete (psi)
Figure 8 calculation of bo
2. A mat foundation is shown in the figure. Size of the all columns is 50 cm x 50 cm.
3. A mat foundation is shown in figure below. Design parameters are also shown below.
Calculate the consolidation settlement under the center of mat.
L = 12 m B = 10 m Df = 2.2 m
Q = 30 MN x1 = x2 = 2 m, x3 = 5.2 m
Preconsolidation pressure = 105 kPa
1. A mat foundation is shown in the figure. Size of the column is 0.5 m x 0.5 m. Calculate
the pressures at A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H.
(35 points)
Pile Foundation
When one or more soil layers at upper depth are highly compressible or too weak
to support the load, we use pile foundation instead of the shallow foundation.
For this purpose, load is transferred to the bed rock or relatively stronger layer.
When the horizontal load at foundation is very high, pile foundation is used in
place of shallow foundation.
To bypass the load from expansive or collapsible soil layer to the stable layer,
we use pile foundation.
When foundation is to be constructed under water, pile foundation is preferred.
To be safer from the loss of bearing capacity due to scouring, we found the
bridge structures on piles.
Types of Pile
Depending on the type of materials used, piles are classified as,
Steel Pile
Concrete Pile
Wooden Pile
Composite Pile
Steel Piles
They are either pipe piles (hollow or concrete filled) or H-piles. H-pile is
preferred over pipe or I sections.
Capacity: Qallowable As f s
Where, As = Cross-sectional area
fs = Allowable stress of steel (0.4 fy)
Figure 2 Steel pile sections a) splicing of H-pile by welding, b) splicing of pipe pile by welding,
c) splicing of H-pile by bolts, d) flat driving point of pile, e) conical driving point of pile
Concrete Pile
They are either pre-cast, pre-stressed, or cast-in-situ
Precast piles are available in rectangular or square shape.
Usual length for pre-cast pile ranges 30 50 ft, pre-stressed pile ranges from
30 - 150 ft, and cast-in-situ piles ranges from 15 150 ft.
Usual load for pre-cast pile ranges 67 675 kips, pre-stressed pile ranges from
1700 - 1900 kips, and cast-in-situ piles ranges from 45 - 115 kips.
Timber Pile
They are tree trunks
These piles are used under water, especially in the bay area.
Usual length ranges from 15 to 50 ft. and load carrying capacity ranges from 67
to 115 kips.
Composite Pile
They are made of more than 2 materials. Steel and concrete or concrete and
timber combinations are common.
Figure 8 Calculation for load bearing (a and b) piles and friction piles (c)
Friction Piles
When bed rock is not available at reasonable depth, load is transferred through
the skin friction even at the softer materials.
Value of Qs is very small and Qu Qs
Figure 9 Pile driving equipment- a) drop hammer and b) single acting air or stem hammer
Figure 9 Pile driving equipment- c) double acting and differential air or stem hammer, d) diesel
hammer, e and f) vibratory pile driver
1
qp Fs Fd Fi D N c' Fcs Fcd Fci N c qFqs Fqd Fqi N q
2
But D <<<<<<< than L. Therefore,
Q p q p Ap
Table 1 Meyerhofs shape, depth, and inclination factors for rectangular footing
Frictional Resistance
Qs p L f
Where, p = perimeter of pile
L = Incremental pile length that has constant p and f.
f = unit friction resistance
Allowable Load
Qu
Qall
FS
L
ql 0.4 Pa N 60 * 4 Pa N 60 Average N60 is from 4 D to 10 D depth.
D
L = 15 D Qs p L f
From 0 to L, f K 0 ' tan ' = 0.8
From 0 to L to L, f f zL'
For bored pile K = K0
For low displacement driven pile K = 1.4 x K0
For high displacement driven pile K = 1.8 x K0
Clay
Method
Qs f p L f cu = adhesion factor
'
N tan 2 (45 ) qu, design = qu, lab/5
2
qu ( design) ( N 1). A p
Qall
FS
Pile Load test
Figure 18 a) Remolded or compacted zone around a pile driven into soft clay, b) Nature of
variation of cu with time for pile driving in a soft clay
Where,
Qg(u) = Ultimate load bearing capacity of pile group
Qu = Ultimate load bearing capacity of a single pile
For friction piles, if the spacing of the piles is wide enough, each pile acts as an
individual pile.
Otherwise, all piles act as a group of pile.
Or
2(n1 n2 2)d 4D
n1n2 p
Qg (u ) Qu
2(n1 n2 2)d 4D
And
n1n2 p
Q u
But, if 1 Qg (u ) Qu
Saturated Clays
Q u n1n2 (Q p Qs )
But
Q p Ap 9cu ( p )
Qs pcu L
Therefore,
Q u
n1n2 9 Ap cu ( p ) pcu L
2. Determine ultimate bearing capacity of a pile group assuming that a pile is acting
as a block of dimension Lg x Bg x L
Q p ( g ) Ap cu ( p ) N c* Lg Bg cu ( p ) N c*
Qs ( g ) 2( Lg Bg )cu L
Therefore,
Q u( g ) Lg Bg cu ( p ) Nc* 2( Lg Bg )cu L
Note: Check settlements using the similar concepts as you used in the shallow
foundation.
2. You are driving a square prestressed concrete pile of 20 m length. Size of the
pile is 381 mm x 381 mm. The pile is embedded entirely into a saturated
homogenous clay layer. However, water table is far below the pile tip. Following
parameters are known from the field test.
Calculate the total allowable load on this pile for a factor of safety of 3.
Comment on the values.
4. A group of 9 piles are driven in a homogenous clay layer having undrained cohesion of
95.8 kPa. Diameter (D) of each pile is 406 mm and spacing of the pile (D) is 700 mm.
Length of each pile is 18.5 m. Assume that the clay is saturated and is 18 kN/m3.
Ground water table is at 30 m below the tip of pile. Calculate the allowable load on this
group of pile for a factor of safety of 3.
5. Plan and section of a building system in downtown LA is shown in the following figure.
It is impossible to extend the foundation beyond the boundary and we need to design a
pile foundation. Considering the safety factor of 3 and ignoring the effect of ground
water, please design the size, number, length, and spacing of driven concrete pile to
support the load.
1. We need to design the foundation for a building. As the soil below the
foundation is very weak, we need to design a group of pile to transfer the load.
Available diameter and length of the pre-stressed concrete piles are 0.4 m and
20 m, respectively. Total load to be transferred is 36 MN and desired factor of
safety is 3. Ground water table is more than 30 m below the ground. The
homogenous clay layer has an undrained cohesion of 100 kPa. Please calculate
the number of piles and spacing of piles to be connected with a pile cap to
transfer the load from the building. Consider that all piles behave similarly and
horizontal movement is zero.
2. We need to support the foundation for a building shown in the following figure
with a number of driven piles. Available diameter and length of the pre-stressed
concrete piles are 0.5 m and 20 m, respectively. Desired factor of safety is 3.
Ground water table is more than 35 m below the ground. The properties of the
clay layers are shown below. Please calculate the number of piles and spacing of
piles to be connected with a pile cap to transfer the load from the building.
Consider that all piles behave similarly and horizontal movement is zero.
3. It is requested to design a foundation system for a student housing project at CSUF. Plan
of the building and column loads are shown in the following figure. Preliminary design
calculation shows that we need to design a deep foundation system with piles. Noise during
pile driving is strictly prohibited. University has a stock of 500 number of circular concrete
piles of 1 ft diameter and 20 ft length. We need to use those piles to save the cost. It is
estimated that the base of pile cap is at the distance of 4 ft below the ground. Desired factor
of safety is 3. Please design the pile foundation system. Consider that all piles behave
similarly and there is no horizontal load in pile.
h
Earth pressure coefficient (K) = where z is the vertical pressure.
z
There are three types of earth pressure situations, which are described below.
For over-consolidate soil, we need to use Mayne and Kulhawy (1982)s equation, which is as
follows.
Based on the calculated earth pressure, we need to calculate lateral earth force which is
equal to the area of the pressure diagram. Line of action of this force is acting at the CG of
the pressure diagram as shown in figure 1 b (for dry case).
For the situation shown in figure 1 b,
1
P0 P1 P2 qK 0 H H 2 K 0
2
The line of action of resultant force is located at,
H H
P1 P2
z 3
2
P0
If water table is located within the retaining wall height, the pressure distribution will be
as shown figure 2.
1 1 1
P0 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 K 0 qH1 K 0 H 1 K 0 (q H 1 ) H 2 K 0 ' H 2 w H 2
2 2 2
2 2 2
Line of application of the force can be calculated by taking the moment at the base.
Figure 2 At rest earth pressure when water table is at a depth smaller than H (Das, 2006)
Figure 3 Variation of the value of earth pressure coefficient with the tilt of wall (Das, 2006)
When the frictionless wall moves away from soil mass as shown in figure 3 and 4, h
decreases. If the wall moves with a distance sufficient enough to reach plastic
equilibrium condition, the horizontal stress acted on the wall is called active earth
pressure.
h'
Earth pressure coefficient Ka =
z'
Soil should move with sufficient amount of distance to reach this condition. Table 1
shows that required distance for different types of soil.
h'
Earth pressure coefficient Kp =
z'
There are various theories to calculate earth pressures, which are described below.
Figure 6 Rankines active (b) and passive (a) zones (Budhu, 2006)
From figure 5 as we derived in Strength of Soil,
' '
a ' z ' tan 2 (45 0 ) 2 c' tan( 45 0 )
2 2
' '
Or a ' ' z tan 2 (45 0 ) 2 c' tan( 45 0 )
2 2
For NC and coarse grained soil, c = 0
a' '
Then, Ka tan 2 (45 0 )
z 2
In general, a ' ' z K a 2 c' K a
2
horizontal.
2
In practice, the wall of limited height yields certain distance La or Lp to give active or
passive pressure condition as shown in figure 6. Those limits are presented in the table 1.
The active and passive earth pressure diagram for a general case is shown in figure 7.
Figure 7 A generalized active and passive earth pressure diagram (Budhu, 2006)
Figure 8 A generalized case of Rankines active and passive earth pressure (Das, 2006)
Locations and directions of Pa and Pp are shown in figure 9. Likewise, an inclination of failure
wedge is calculated as,
' 1 sin
sin 1
4 2 2 2 sin
Table 2 shows the values of Ka(R) for different and for a vertical backfill.
Table 3 Passive earth pressure coefficient (KpR) for a vertical backfill (Das, 2006)
Figure 10 Pressure distribution against a retaining wall for cohesionless backfill with
horizontal surcharge: a) Rankines active, and b) Rankines passive (Das, 2006)
Passive Case
p ' K p H
1
Pp K p H 2
2
H
Line of action, x=
3
At z = H u = w . H2
1 1
Pa = Ka q H + Ka H12 + Ka H1 H2 + (Ka + w) H22
2 2
Figure 13 Rankines active earth pressure for cohesive soil backfill. (Das, 2006)
2 cu
z0
As the soil cant resist negative pressure, cracks are formed up to z0 depth. They
are called tension cracks. In long term, these cracks are filled with water and
provide water pressure.
1
Pa = Ka H2 2 K a c H
2
For = 0 condition,
1
Pa = H2 2 c u H
2
Generally, pressure from ground level to z0 is ignored.
From diagram shown in figure 12,
2c'
Pa
1
K a H 2 K a c' H
K a
2
1 c' 2
Pa K a H 2 2 K a c' H 2
2
For = 0 situation
2
1 c
Pa H 2 2 cu H 2 u
2
Passive Case
Figure 14 Rankines passive earth pressure for cohesive soil backfill. (Das, 2006)
p K p z 2 K p c'
At z = 0, p 2 K p c'
At z = H, p K p H 2 K p c'
1
Pp K p H 2 2 K p c' H
2
For = 0 condition, Kp = 1
1
Pp H 2 2cu H
2
Cohesionless Backfill
Figure 16 Coulombs Earth Pressure Theory: (a) trial failure wedge, and (b) Force Polygon(Das, 2006)
W Pa
sin( 90 ' ' ) sin( ' )
sin( ' )
Therefore, Pa W
sin( 90 ' ' )
1 cos( ) cos( ) sin( ' )
Or Pa H2 2
2 cos sin( ) sin( 90 ' ' )
cos2 ( ' )
Ka 2
sin( ' ' ) sin( ' )
cos cos( ) 1
2
cos( ' ) cos( )
For = 0, = 0, and = 0, Coulombs earth pressure coefficient is same as Rankines earth
pressure coefficient.
Table 5 Value of Ka for =0 and = 0 (Das, 2006)
cos2 ( ' )
Kp 2
sin( ' ' ) sin( ' )
cos cos( ' ) 1
2
cos( ' ) cos( )
Figure 5 Assumption - determination of earth pressure in semi-gravity retaining wall (Das, 2006)
But for Coubombs theory, soil structural friction angle should be known.
Excessive settlement and deep seated failure occurs when the weak soil is underlain by
a strong soil.
1
PP K P 2 D 2 2c 2 ' K P D
2
'2
K P tan 2 (45 0 )
2
M R Sum of resisting moment
FSoverturning about toe >3
M O sum of overturnin g moment
Figure 9 Shear key and extended heel can increase FS against sliding (Das, 2006)
qu
FS bearing capacity >3
q max
V 6e
q max qtoe (1 )
B B
V 6e
q min q heel (1 )
B B
1
qu c 2 ' N c Fcd Fci qN q Fqd Fqi 2 B' N Fd Fi
2
B = B 2e
3. Analyze the stability of the retaining wall shown below. The wall should be
analyzed for (1) overturning, (2) bearing capacity, and (3) sliding.
For sliding stability, you may assume that = for the foundation soil. In
determining the factor of safety against bearing capacity failure at the toe of
the wall, you may assume that the ultimate bearing pressure is 10,000 psf.
3. You have to review the design of a cantilevered concrete retaining wall designed for the height
and soil as shown in the figure. Please check the design and provide your recommendation for
the following situation:
Surcharge load on top of the backfill material = 200 psf
Lean clay at foundation same soil for backfill
Dry unit weight of soil = 115 pcf
Cohesion/adhesion of the clay/concrete = 1200 psf
Bearing capacity of the soil = 8,000 psf
Active earth pressure coefficient = 0.4
Ignore the effect of ground water table
4. An engineer designed a cantilevered concrete retaining wall for the height of 15 ft in a medium
stiff clay, properties of which are shown in the figure. Same clay material was used for the back
fill and the backfill material has the following properties.
Unit weight of soil = 113 pcf
Cohesion =0
0
Drained friction angle = 10
Bearing capacity of the foundation soil is 6,000 psf. Please check the design and provide your
recommendation.
5. For sustainable construction, use of tire derived aggregate (TDA) as a geotechnical material is
being popular lately. A retaining wall was designed and constructed at Highway 91 near Riverside
with that type of material. Shown in the following figure is a section of a cantilever retaining wall
that was designed by a geotechnical engineer. Section of the retaining wall and the properties of
the foundation soil as well as the TDA backfill material are shown in the sketch. Please ignore the
effect of thin clay layer used at the top. Bearing capacity of the foundation soil is 6,200 psf.
Please check the design and provide your recommendation. If the TDA material is replaced with
0
sand that has unit weight of 115 pcf and friction angle of 33 , will the design be better? Use unit
weight of concrete as 150 pcf and ignore the effect of soil above the base of retaining wall for the
passive earth pressure calculation.
2. A proposed super store site is shown in the figure. A cantilever retaining wall is to be designed
to retain the soil for final grade as well as the storm water, shown below. Frost depth in the area
is 3 ft. Please propose a tentative section of the retaining wall and check whether the retaining
wall you proposed is safe or not against over-turning, bearing capacity, and sliding. The
0
foundation soil as well as the backfill soil is a loose sand of 30 friction angle. Saturated unit
weight of soil is 120 pcf. Bearing capacity of the foundation material is 10,000 psf.
3. You have to review the design of a cantilevered concrete retaining wall designed for the height
and soil as shown in the figure. Please check the design and provide your recommendation for
the following situation:
= 34 d = 120 pcf
0
Sandy backfill with and
Clayey base soil with Cu/a = 1.4 ksf and d = 115 pcf
4. A retaining wall is already constructed and the section of the retaining wall is shown in the
following figure. There was a debate between two engineers regarding the use of backfill material.
Engineer A wanted to use the soil that was derived from the excavation material as a back fill soil.
Engineer B wanted to use an imported sandy backfill material. Properties of the soils are given in
Table. Please perform review calculations to evaluate the appropriateness of the backfill
materials proposed and provide your opinion.
Bearing capacity of the foundation soil is 8 ksf. Please consider: a) the surcharge load for both
resisting moment and earth pressure calculations; b) passive earth pressure below the top of the
footing/slab. Take skin friction as 0.7 times the drained friction.
For cantilever sheet pile, anchors are not necessary, but other process is same.
Design Consideration
Cantilever sheet piles are useful up to 20 ft. height above dredge line.
The wall rotates at an imaginary point O.
We dont need to consider hydrostatic pressure as they cancel out.
Pressure distribution is shown in the following figure.
Designing the sheet pile includes calculation of embedment depth, pile section
and design of anchor block.
Figure 6 Pressure and moment diagram of cantilever sheet pile penetrating sand
Therefore, HB ' ( K p K a ) L4
'
3
For equilibrium,
PH 0 M @ B 0
PH 0
P 0.5 '3 L4 0.5 L5 ( '3 ' 4 ) 0 P = Area of pressure diagram ACDE
'3 L4 2P
L5
'3 ' 4
M @ B 0
L4 L
P( L4 z ) (0.5 '3 L4 )( ) 0.5 L5 ( '3 ' 4 )( 5 ) 0
3 3
Combining both equations will give a quadratic equation in terms of L4.
L4 A1 L4 A2 L4 A3 L4 A4 0
4 3 2
Where
'5
A1
' (K p K a )
8P
A2
' (K p K a )
6 P(2 z ' ( K p K a ) '5 )
A3
'2 (K p K a ) 2
P(6 z '5 4 P)
A4
'2 (K p K a ) 2
Stepwise Procedure to get pressure diagram
' '
1. Calculate Ka and Kp K a tan 2 (45 0 ) K p tan 2 (45 0 )
2 2
2. Calculate 1 and 2 with given L1 and L2
2P
z'
( K p K a ) '
z'
M max P( z z ' ) (0.5 z ' 2 ( K p K a ) ' )
3
Design sheet pile based on the section modulus (S) calculated from Mmax and
allowable stress (all). i.e. select the right section for this section modulus.
M max
S
all
' 2 LK a
' 3 L4 ( K p K a )
' 4 5 ' L4 ( K p K a )
'5 L K p L3 ( K p K a )
'2 LK a
L3
' (K p K a ) (K p K a )
1 1
P 2 ' L 2 ' L3
2 2
L LK a L L( 2 K a K p )
z ' L3
3 K p Ka 3 3( K p K a )
'5 8P
A1 A2
(K p K a ) (K p K a )
6 P (2 z ( K p K a ) ' 5 ) P(6 z '5 4 P)
A3 A4
(K p K a )
2 2
2 (K p K a ) 2
L4 A1 L4 A2 L4 A3 L4 A4 0
4 3 2
Figure 8 Pressure and moment diagram of cantilever sheet pile penetrating clay
For equilibrium,
PH 0 M @ B 0
PH 0
1
P1 [4c (L1 ' L2 )]D L4 [4c (L1 ' L2 ) 4c (L1 ' L2 )] 0
2
P1 = Area of pressure diagram ACDE
D[4c (L1 ' L2 )] P1
L4
4c
M @ B 0
2
D 1 L
P( D z1 ) [( 4c (L1 ' L2 )] L4 (8c)( 4 ) 0
2 2 3
Combining both equations,
P1 ( P1 12c z1 )
D 2 [4c (L1 ' L2 )] 2 DP1 0
(L1 ' L2 ) 2c
Get D from the above equation.
P1 ( P1 12c z1 )
D 2 [4c (L1 ' L2 )] 2 DP1 0
(L1 ' L2 ) 2c
D[4c (L1 ' L2 )] P1
6. Calculate L L4
4c
7. Calculate 6 and 7 6 ' 4c (L1 ' L2 ) 7 4c (L1 ' L2 )
8. Draw pressure distribution diagram as shown in the figure.
9. Calculate Design D Ddesign = 1.5 D
Figure 10 Variation of deflection and moment for anchored sheet pile a) free
earth support method, and b) fixed earth support method
Penetration depth with free earth support system is always less than that with the
fixed earth support system.
For equilibrium,
PH 0 M @ O ' 0
PH 0
P 0.5 '8 L4 F 0 P = Area of pressure diagram ACDE
F P 0.5[ ' ( K p K a )] L4
2
M O ' 0
1 2
P[( L1 L2 L3 ) ( z l1 )] [ ' ( K p K a )]L4 (l 2 L2 L3 L4 ) 0
2
2 3
3P[( L1 L2 L3 ) ( z l1 )]
Or L4 1.5 L4 (l 2 L2 L3 ) 0
3 2
' (K p K a )
Get L4 from the above equation.
Dtheoretical = L3+L4
Ddesign = 1.4 Dtheoretical
Figure 12 Log vs Md/Mmax chart for sheet pile walls penetrating sand in Rowes MR Method
In figure,
H '4
relativefl exibility 10.91 10 7 H in m E in MN/m2
EI
I in m4/ m length of wall
H '4
relativefl exibility H in ft E in psi
EI
I in in4/ ft length of wall
Md = design Moment
Mmax = Maximum theoretical moment
Design of Anchored Sheet Pile with Free earth Support method Clay
For equilibrium,
PH 0 M @ O ' 0
PH 0
P1 '6 D F
M O ' 0
D
P1 ( L1 L2 l1 z1 ) ' 6 D(l 2 L2 )0
2
Or '6 D 2 2 '6 D( L1 L2 l1 ) 2P1 ( L1 L2 l1 z1 ) 0
L1 L2
Calculate Non-dimensional wall height
( L1 L2 Dactual )
cu
Calculate stability number S n 1.25
(L1 ' L2 )
L1 L2
Calculate Non-dimensional wall height
( L1 L2 Dactual )
Calculate and log
Md
Determine from chart shown below
M max
Choose a sheet pile section and follow the same technique as explained in the
case of sand.
Figure 12 Stability number vs Md/Mmax chart for sheet pile walls penetrating clay in Rowes MR
Method
a. Calculate Dtheotetical, Ddesign for 30% increment, and Length of sheet pile.
b. Mmax (theoretical)
a. Calculate Dtheotetical, Ddesign for 40% increment, and Length of sheet pile
b. Mmax (theoretical)
1. A sheet pile is to be designed for the section shown below. Using the Free
earth support method, calculate the following parameters.
a. Dtheotetical and Ddesign
b. Anchor Force per unit length of wall.
2.
a. Design a sheet pile wall section for the above problem using Rowes moment
reduction technique,
b. Design an anchor bulkhead section for the above section.
3. You have to check the calculation for the total height of an anchored sheet pile
wall as shown in the following figure. Using the free earth support method,
4. Please check the calculation for the total height of an anchored sheet pile wall
as shown in the following figure. Using the free earth support method,
5. You are required to design a total height of sheet pile system for the following topographic
condition and make a complete pressure diagram that helps to estimate the maximum
moment required for the design of sheet pile. Please perform necessary calculations for that
and present your results neatly.
Figure 1 Various types of anchor system for the sheet pile walls a) anchor plate or
beam, b) tie back, c) vertical anchor pile, d) anchor beam with batter pile
F H 0
1 1
P'u F H 2 K p cos H 2 K a cos '
2 2
1
P'u H 2 ( K p cos K a cos ' )
2
F V 0
1 1
H 2 K p sin H 2 K a sin 'W 0
2 2
1
H 2 K a sin 'W
K p sin 2
1
H 2
2
C ov 1
P'us Pu ' Pus = Ultimate resistance of a continuous anchor
H
C ov ( )
h
Cov = 19 for dense sand and 14 for loose sand.
Pu P'us Be
Equivalent length (Be) can be calculated from the above figure.
Empirical Method
Pu can also be calculated from empirical method.
0.28
5 .4 H 2
P'u AH
tan ' A
A = area of anchor i.e. B.h
Factor of safety
Pu
FS = generally 3
P' all
Figure 6 Experimental variation of Pu/(hBc) with H/h for plate anchors in clay
In clays,
Pu d l ca
Generally, FS of 2 is taken.
For the material of the sheet pile, consider E = 29 x 106 psi all = 30,000
psi
In many cases we need to construct a vertical or near vertical trench for the
construction of foundation.
We need to protect that slope from collapsing with the help of bracing system.
Those bracings are provided with a) soldier pile ( a vertical steel or timber
beam braced by horizontal members called lagging), or b) sheet pile ( a vertical
inter-locking sheet piles), and c) slurry wall
In both cases, piles are driven before trenching and once the desired depth is
reached, wales and struts are used to support the piles.
We need to calculate the lateral earth pressure distribution for designing such
bracing systems.
Mostly, the empirical pressure diagrams are used for the design purpose.
Figure 1: Different types of braced excavation systems a) soldier beams, b) sheet piles
Sequence of construction
1. Install pile.
2. Excavate a little
3. Install bracing or anchors
4. Go to 2.
Excavation in Clay ( = 0)
Figure 4: Pecks apparent pressure envelope for cuts in soft to medium stiff clays
H
For soft to medium clays with 4 , pressure should be larger of,
c
4c
a H 1
and a 0.3 H
H
Assumptions
Apply to the excavations deeper than 20 ft.
Water table is below the bottom of excavation
Sand completely drained
Clay completely undrained
Layered Soil
c av
1
2H
s K s H s 2 tan ' s ( H H s )n ' qu
For = 0, Ks = 1
n = coefficient of progressive failure = 0.75
Ks = earth pressure coefficient for sand
qu = Unconfined compressive strength of clay
Likewise, av
1
s H s ( H H s ) c
H
For different types of clay layers,
c H
1
c av i i
H
Hi
1
av i
H
Figure shown below has been developed from the data gathered from a number of
excavation projects. It is a tool to predict the ground movement in the surrounding
areas as the result of an excavation for wide varying subsurface conditions. Using this
figure one can determine the induced settlement adjacent to an excavation. It is an
empirical and not a theoretical expression of actual expectations.
Example:
5. Detail of a trench that requires a design of the bracing system is shown in the following
figure. Using steel sections with allowable stress of 4000 ksf, calculate axial loads for all
struts, and section modulus for all wales and shoulder piles. Please make necessary
assumptions.