Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Information Retreival - MD
Information Retreival - MD
Similarity threshold
The similarity threshold is a lower limit for the similarity of two data records
that belong to the same cluster.
For example, if you set the similarity threshold to 0.25, data records with field
values that are 25% similar are likely to be assigned to the same cluster.
If you specify a similarity threshold of 1.0, you are insisting that, for customers
to appear in the same group, their characteristics must be identical.
You might have a large number of customer characteristic variables, or the
variables might take a wide range of values.
The right setting is somewhere in between, but where? You have to preserve a
balance between the number of clusters that is acceptable and the degree of
similarity.
There is another important factor that the Distribution-based Clustering algorithm
has to consider.
A situation might occur where you try to give the Distribution-based Clustering
algorithm a similarity threshold,and you do not limit the number of clusters that
it can produce.
In this case, it will keep trying to find the minimum number of clusters that
satisfy the similarity threshold, because this also maximizes the Condorcet value.
In a different situation, you might have limited the number of clusters with the
result that, after all the possible clusters are created, a record does not have a
similarity above the threshold with any of them.
In this case, the record will be assigned to the cluster with the best similarity,
even if the similarity threshold is not reached.
Distribution-based Clustering
Distribution-based Clustering provides fast and natural clustering of very large
databases.
It automatically determines the number of clusters to be generated.
Typically, demographic data consists of large amounts of categorical variables.
Therefore the mining function works best with data sets that consist of this type
of variables.
You can also use numerical variables.
The Distribution-based Clustering algorithm treats numerical variables almost like
categorical variables by categorizing their values into buckets.
Distribution-based Clustering is an iterative process over the input data.
Each input record is read in succession.
The similarity of each record with each of the currently existing clusters is
calculated.
Initially, no clusters exist.
If the biggest calculated similarity is above a given threshold, the record is
added to the relevant cluster.
This cluster's characteristics change accordingly.
If the calculated similarity is not above the threshold, or if there is no cluster,
a new cluster is created, containing the record alone.
You can specify the maximum number of clusters, as well as the similarity
threshold.
Distribution-based Clustering uses the statistical Condorcet criteria to manage the
calculation of the similarity between records and other records, between records
and clusters, and between clusters and other clusters.
The Condorcet criteria evaluates how homogeneous each discovered cluster is (in
that the records it contains are similar) and how heterogeneous the discovered
clusters are among each other.
The iterative process of discovering clusters stops after one or more passes over
the input data if there is no time remaining to do another pass or if the
improvement of the clusters according to the Condorcet criteria would not justify a
new pass.
Similarity scale
The similarity between two data records sums the similarities between each pair of
values of these records.
For a categorical field, the similarity is 0 if both values are different, and 1 if
they are equal.
For a numerical field, the similarity depends on the difference between the two
values compared with the similarity scale of the field.
If the two values are equal, the similarity is 1. If the two values are distant
from the similarity scale, the similarity is 0.5.
Other values of the similarity are calculated using a Gaussian curve passing
through these two reference points.
You can choose to specify a similarity scale or not.
You specify the similarity scale as an absolute number. The specification is
considered only for active numerical fields. If you do not specify a similarity
scale, the default value (half of the standard deviation) is used.
Similarity matrices
For each categorical field, you can define a similarity matrix that contains user-
defined similarities between two field values.
A similarity matrix is represented as a reference to a database table containing
three columns.
Two columns contain the field values to be compared, and the third column contains
the similarity (between 0 and 1) for these field values.
You can specify the similarity for each pair of possible values.
A pair of possible values can be used only once.
The similarity of the inverse pair is the same
Field weighting
Field weighting gives more or less weight to certain input fields during a
Clustering training run.
For example, to identify different types of shoppers, you might not want to give
too much weight to the strong correlation between the number of purchases and the
total purchase amount.
Therefore you assign a smaller weight to the fields Number of purchases and Total
purchase amount.
The following table shows the decreased field weights for the fields Number of
purchases and the Total purchase amount.
Value weighting
Value weighting deals with the fact that particular values in a field might be more
common than other values in that field.
The coincidence of rare values in a field adds more to the overall similarity than
the coincidence of frequent values.
For example, most people do not have a Gold credit card.
It is not very significant if two people do not have one, however, if they do, it
is significant.
Therefore, the coincidence of people not having a Gold credit card adds less to
their overall similarity than the coincidence of people having one.
You can use one of the following types of value weighting:
Probability weighting
Probability weighting assigns a weight to each value according to its probability
in the input data. Rare values carry a large weight, while common values carry a
small weight. This weight is used for both matching and non-matching records.
Probability weighting uses a factor of 1/p, where p is the probability of a value.
Logarithmic weighting
Logarithmic weighting assigns a weight to each value according to the logarithm of
its probability in the input data.
Rare values carry a large weight, while common values carry a small weight.
This weight is used for both matching and non-matching records.
Logarithmic weighting assigns a value of (-log(p)) to both the agreement
information content value and the disagreement information content value.
The number p is the probability of a value.
Each type of value weighting looks at a problem from a different angle.
Depending on the value distribution, using one type or the other might lead to very
different results.
For example, if a supermarket is located in a retirement community, a Senior
discount field has a high probability of having the value Yes.
You might use probabilistic value weighting to assign a weight to the values in the
Senior discount field that is equal to its probability in the input data.
Value weighting has the additional effect of emphasizing fields with many values
because their values are less frequent than those of fields with fewer possible
values.
By default, the mining function does not compensate for this additional effect.
You can select whether you want to compensate for the value weighting applied to
each field.
If you compensate for value weighting, the overall importance of the weighted field
is equal to that of an unweighted field.
This is so regardless of the number of possible values.
Compensated weighting affects only the relative importance of coincidences within
the set of possible values.
I'M ABOUT TO START MY FIRST UML-BASED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. WHAT DO I NEED TO DO?
Three things, probably (but not necessarily) in this order:
1)Select a methodology: A methodology formally defines the process that you use to
gather requirements, analyze them, and design an application that meets them in
every way.
There are many methodologies, each differing in some way or ways from the others.
There are many reasons why one methodology may be better than another for your
particular project: For example, some are better suited for large enterprise
applications while others are built to design small embedded or safety-critical
systems.
On another axis, some methods better support large numbers of architects and
designers working on the same project, while others work better when used by one
person or a small group
OMG, as a vendor-neutral organization, does not have an opinion about any
methodology.
2)Select a UML Development Tool: Because most (although not all) UML-based tools
implement a particular methodology, in some cases it might not be practical to pick
a tool and then try to use it with a methodology that it wasn't built for. (For
other tool/methodology combinations, this might not be an issue, or might be easy
to work around.)
But, some methodologies have been implemented on multiple tools so this is not
strictly a one-choice environment.
You may find a tool so well-suited to your application or organization that you're
willing to switch methodologies in order to use it. If that's the case, go ahead -
our advice to pick a methodology first is general, and may not apply to a specific
project. Another possibility: You may find a methodology that you like, which isn't
implemented in a tool that fits your project size, or your budget, so you have to
switch. If either of these cases happens to you, try to pick an alternative
methodology that doesn't differ too much from the one you preferred originally.
As with methodologies, OMG doesn't have an opinion or rating of UML-based modeling
tools, but we do have links to a number of lists here. These will help you get
started making your choice.
You may find a tool so well-suited to your application or organization that you're
willing to switch methodologies in order to use it.
If that's the case, go ahead - our advice to pick a methodology first is general,
and may not apply to a specific project.
Another possibility: You may find a methodology that you like, which isn't
implemented in a tool that fits your project size, or your budget, so you have to
switch.
If either of these cases happens to you, try to pick an alternative methodology
that doesn't differ too much from the one you preferred originally.
As with methodologies, OMG doesn't have an opinion or rating of UML-based modeling
tools, but we do have links to a number of lists here.
These will help you get started making your choice.
3)Get Training: You and your staff (unless you're lucky enough to hire UML-
experienced architects) will need training in UML.
It's best to get training that teaches how to use your chosen tool with your chosen
methodology, typically provided by either the tool supplier or methodologist.
If you decide not to go this route, check out OMG's training page for a course that
meets your needs. Once you've learned UML, you can become an OMG-certified UML
Professional-check here for details.
As with methodologies, OMG doesn't have an opinion or rating of UML-based modeling
tools, but we do have links to a number of lists here.
These will help you get started making your choice.
AuthorDate:
In the authordate method (Harvard referencing), the in-text citation is placed in
parentheses after the sentence or part thereof that the citation supports.
The citation includes the author's name, year of publication, and page number(s)
when a specific part of the source is referred to (Smith 2008, p. 1) or (Smith
2008:1). A full citation is given in the references section: Smith, John (2008).
Name of Book. Name of Publisher.
How to cite[edit]
The structure of a citation under the authordate method is the author's surname,
year of publication, and page number or range, in parentheses, as illustrated in
the Smith example near the top of this article.
1)The page number or page range is omitted if the entire work is cited. The
author's surname is omitted if it appears in the text. Thus we may say: "Jones
(2001) revolutionized the field of trauma surgery."
2)Two authors are cited using "and" or "&": (Deane and Jones 1991) or (Deane &
Jones 1991). More than two authors are cited using "et al.": (Smith et al. 1992).
3)In some documentation systems (e.g., MLA style), an unknown date is cited as
having "no date of publication" by the abbreviation for "no date" (Deane, n.d.).[6]
4)In such documentation systems, works without pagination are referred to in the
References list as "not paginated" with the abbreviation for that phrase (n. pag.).
[6]
5)"No place of publication" and/or "no publisher" are both designated the same way
(n.p.) and placed in the appropriate spot in the bibliographical citation (Harvard
Referencing. N.p.).[6]
6)A reference to a republished work is cited with the original publication date
either in square brackets (Marx [1867] 1967, p. 90) or separated with a slash
(Marx, 1867/1967, p. 90).[7] The inclusion of the original publication year
qualifies the suggestion otherwise that the publication originally occurred in
1967.
7)If an author published several books in 2005, the year of the first publication
(in the alphabetic order of the references) is cited and referenced as 2005a, the
second as 2005b and so on.
8)A citation is placed wherever appropriate in or after the sentence. If it is at
the end of a sentence, it is placed before the period, but a citation for an entire
block quote immediately follows the period at the end of the block since the
citation is not an actual part of the quotation itself.
9)Complete citations are provided in alphabetical order in a section following the
text, usually designated as "Works cited" or "References." The difference between a
"works cited" or "references" list and a bibliography is that a bibliography may
include works not directly cited in the text.
10)All citations are in the same font as the main text.
11)Note that "[t]he 'Harvard System' is something of a misnomer, as there is no
official institutional connection. It's another name for the author/date citation
system, the custom of using author and date in parentheses, e.g. (Robbins 1987) to
refer readers to the full bibliographic citations in appended bibliographies. Some
Harvard faculty were among the first practitioners in the late 19th century, and
the name stuck, particularly in England and the Commonwealth countries."[8]
12)Also note that there is no official guide to Harvard citation style,[9]
consequently variations occur across various online Harvard citation and
referencing guides. For example, some universities instruct students to type a
book's publication date without parentheses in the reference list
Examples[edit]
An example of a journal reference:
Heilman, J. M. and West, A. G. (2015). Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying
Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language. Journal of Medical
Internet Research, 17(3), p.e62. doi:10.2196/jmir.4069.
Smith, J. (2005a). Dutch Citing Practices. The Hague: Holland Research Foundation.
Smith, J. (2005b). Harvard Referencing. London: Jolly Good Publishing.
Advantages[edit]
1)The principal advantage of the authordate method is that a reader familiar with
a field is likely to recognize a citation without having to check in the references
section. This is most useful in fields whose works are commonly known by their date
of publication (for example, the sciences and social sciences in which one cites,
say, "the 2005 Johns Hopkins study of brain function"), or if the author cited is
notorious (for example, HIV denialist Peter Duesberg on the cause of AIDS).
2)The use of authordate systems helps the reader easily identify sources that may
be outdated.
3)If the same source is cited more than once, even a reader unfamiliar with the
author may remember the name. It quickly becomes obvious if the publication is
relying heavily on a single author or single publication. When many different pages
of the same work are cited, the reader does not need to flip back and forth to
footnotes or endnotes full of "ibid." citations to discover this fact.
4)With the authordate method, there is no renumbering hassle when the order of in-
text citations is changed, which can be a scourge of the numbered endnotes system
if house style or project style insists that citations never appear out of
numerical order. (Computerized reference-management software automates this aspect
of the numbered system [for example, Microsoft Word's endnote system, Wikipedia's
<ref> system, LaTeX/BibTeX, or various applications marketed to professionals].)
5)Parenthetical referencing works well in combination with substantive notes. When
the note system is used for source citations, two different systems of note marking
and placement are neededin Chicago Style, for instance, "the citation notes should
be numbered and appear as endnotes. The substantive notes, indicated by asterisks
and other symbols, appear as footnotes" ("Chicago Manual of Style" 2003, 16.63-64).
This approach can be cumbersome in any circumstances. When it is not possible to
use footnotes altogether probably because of the publisher's policy, it results in
two parallel series of endnotes, which can be confusing to readers. Using
parenthetical referencing for sources avoids such a problem.
Advantages[edit]
The principal advantage of the authordate method is that a reader familiar with a
field is likely to recognize a citation without having to check in the references
section. This is most useful in fields whose works are commonly known by their date
of publication (for example, the sciences and social sciences in which one cites,
say, "the 2005 Johns Hopkins study of brain function"), or if the author cited is
notorious (for example, HIV denialist Peter Duesberg on the cause of AIDS).
The use of authordate systems helps the reader easily identify sources that may be
outdated.
If the same source is cited more than once, even a reader unfamiliar with the
author may remember the name. It quickly becomes obvious if the publication is
relying heavily on a single author or single publication. When many different pages
of the same work are cited, the reader does not need to flip back and forth to
footnotes or endnotes full of "ibid." citations to discover this fact.
With the authordate method, there is no renumbering hassle when the order of in-
text citations is changed, which can be a scourge of the numbered endnotes system
if house style or project style insists that citations never appear out of
numerical order. (Computerized reference-management software automates this aspect
of the numbered system [for example, Microsoft Word's endnote system, Wikipedia's
<ref> system, LaTeX/BibTeX, or various applications marketed to professionals].)
Parenthetical referencing works well in combination with substantive notes. When
the note system is used for source citations, two different systems of note marking
and placement are neededin Chicago Style, for instance, "the citation notes should
be numbered and appear as endnotes. The substantive notes, indicated by asterisks
and other symbols, appear as footnotes" ("Chicago Manual of Style" 2003, 16.63-64).
This approach can be cumbersome in any circumstances. When it is not possible to
use footnotes altogether probably because of the publisher's policy, it results in
two parallel series of endnotes, which can be confusing to readers. Using
parenthetical referencing for sources avoids such a problem
Disadvantages[edit]
1)The principal disadvantage of parenthetical references is they take up space in
the main body of the text and are distracting to a reader, especially when many
works are cited in a single place (which often occurs when reviewing a large body
of previous work). Numbered footnotes or endnotes, by contrast, can be combined
into a range, e.g. "[2735]". However this disadvantage is offset by the fact that
parenthetical referencing may be economical for the overall document since, for
instance, "(Smith 2008: 34)" takes up a small amount of space in a paragraph,
whereas the same information would require a whole line in a footnote or endnote.
2)In many disciplines in the arts and humanities, date of publication is often not
the most important piece of information about a particular work. Thus, in author
date references such as "(Dickens 2003: 10)", the date is essentially redundant or
meaningless when read on the page, since works may go through numerous editions or
translations long after the original publication. Compare a reference in a science
discipline such as "The last survey indicated that four hundred were left in the
wild (Jones et al. 2003)", where the date is meaningful. The reader of certain
forms of arts and humanities scholarship may thus be better aided by the use of
authortitle referencing styles such as MLA: for example, "(Dickens Oliver, 10)",
where meaningful information is given on the page. Historical scholarship is an
exception, since, when citing a primary source, date of publication is meaningful,
though in most branches of history footnotes are preferred on other grounds.
Generally speaking, however, it is instructive that authordate systems such as
Harvard were devised by scientists, whereas authortitle systems such as MLA were
devised by humanities scholars.
3)Similarly, because works are frequently reprinted in many arts and humanities
disciplines, different authordate references might refer to the same work. For
example, "(Spivak 1985)", "(Spivak 1987)", and "(Spivak 1996)" might all refer to
the same essay and might be better rendered in authortitle style as "(Spivak
'Subaltern')". Such ambiguities may be resolved by adding an original date of
publication, for example, "(Spivak 1985/1996)", though this is cumbersome and
exacerbates the principal disadvantage of parenthetical referencing, namely its
distraction for the reader and unattractiveness on the page.
4)Rules can be complicated or unclear for non-academic references, particularly
those where the personal author is unknown, such as government-issued documents and
standards.
5)When removing a portion of text which has citations in it, the editor(s) must
also check the Reference sections to see if the sources cited in the removed text
is used elsewhere in the paper or book, and if not, to delete any reference not
actually cited in the text (although this issue can be eliminated by the use of
reference manager software).
6)The use of the authordate methods (but not authortitle) can be confusing when
used in monographs about particularly prolific authors. In-text citation and back-
of-the-book listings of works arranged by date of publication are conducive to
errors and confusion: for example, Harvey 1996a, Harvey 1996b, Harvey 1996c, Harvey
1996d, Harvey 1995a, Harvey 1995b, Harvey 1986a, Harvey 1986b, and so on.
7)The mixing of text with frequent parentheses and long strings of numbers is
typographically inelegant.
8)Most historical journals (apart from economic and social history) use footnotes
because of the need for maximum flexibility. Primary source references to archives,
etc., involve long and complex information, all of which may be immediately
relevant to a serious reader. An interesting example of this arose with the famous
work of the anthropologists John and Jean Comaroff, Of Revelation and Revolution
which treated historical events from anthropological perspective: although
parenthetical references were used for scholarly sources, the authors found it
necessary to use notes for the historical archive material they were also using.
Authortitle[edit]
In the authortitle or authorpage method, also referred to as MLA style, the in-
text citation is placed in parentheses after the sentence or part thereof that the
citation supports, and includes the author's name (a short title only is necessary
when there is more than one work by the same author) and a page number where
appropriate (Smith 1) or (Smith, Playing 1). (No "p." or "pp." prefaces the page
numbers and main words in titles appear in capital letters, following MLA style
guidelines.) A full citation is given in the references section.
Vancouver style:
1)Authors name.
2)Title of article.
3)Name of journal.
4)Volume number followed by decimal & issue no.
5)Year of publication.
6)Page numbers.
7)Medium of publication.
Example
Matarrita-Cascante, David. "Beyond Growth: Reaching Tourism-Led Development."
Annals of Tourism Research 37.4 (2010): 1141-63. Print
Example:
H. Yano, K. Abe, M. Nogi, A. N. Nakagaito, J. Mater. Sci., 2010, 45, 133.
For any given question, it's likely that someone has written the answer down
somewhere. The amount of natural language text that is available in electronic form
is truly staggering, and is increasing every day.
However, the complexity of natural language can make it very difficult to access
the information in that text. The state of the art in NLP is still a long way from
being able to build general-purpose representations of meaning from unrestricted
text.
If we instead focus our efforts on a limited set of questions or "entity
relations," such as "where are different facilities located," or "who is employed
by what company," we can make significant progress.
The goal of this chapter is to answer the following questions:
1)How can we build a system that extracts structured data, such as tables, from
unstructured text?
2)What are some robust methods for identifying the entities and relationships
described in a text?
3)Which corpora are appropriate for this work, and how do we use them for training
and evaluating our models?
Along the way, we'll apply techniques from the last two chapters to the problems of
chunking and named-entity recognition.
Information Extraction
Information comes in many shapes and sizes. One important form is structured data,
where there is a regular and predictable organization of entities and
relationships.
For example, we might be interested in the relation between companies and
locations. Given a particular company, we would like to be able to identify the
locations where it does business; conversely, given a location, we would like to
discover which companies do business in that location.
If our data is in tabular form, such as the example in 1.1, then answering these
queries is straightforward.
Table 1.1
Locations data
OrgName LocationName
Omnicom New York
DDB Needham New York
Kaplan Thaler Group New York
BBDO South Atlanta
Georgia-Pacific Atlanta
If this location data was stored in Python as a list of tuples (entity, relation,
entity), then the question "Which organizations operate in Atlanta?" could be
translated as follows:
>>> locs = [('Omnicom', 'IN', 'New York'),
... ('DDB Needham', 'IN', 'New York'),
... ('Kaplan Thaler Group', 'IN', 'New York'),
... ('BBDO South', 'IN', 'Atlanta'),
... ('Georgia-Pacific', 'IN', 'Atlanta')]
>>> query = [e1 for (e1, rel, e2) in locs if e2=='Atlanta']
>>> print(query)
['BBDO South', 'Georgia-Pacific']
Things are more tricky if we try to get similar information out of text.
For example, consider the following snippet (from nltk.corpus.ieer, for fileid
NYT19980315.0085).
If you read through information extraction, you will glean the information required
to answer the example question. But how do we get a machine to understand enough
about information extraction to return the answers in 1.2? This is obviously a much
harder task. Unlike 1.1, information extraction contains no structure that links
organization names with location names.
One approach to this problem involves building a very general representation of
meaning.
In this chapter we take a different approach, deciding in advance that we will only
look for very specific kinds of information in text, such as the relation between
organizations and locations. Rather than trying to use text like information
extraction to answer the question directly, we first convert the unstructured data
of natural language sentences into the structured data of Information Extraction
Architecture.
Then we reap the benefits of powerful query tools such as SQL.
This method of getting meaning from text is called Information Extraction.
Chunking
The basic technique we will use for entity detection is chunking, which segments
and labels multi-token sequences as illustrated in Noun Phrase Chunking. The
smaller boxes show the word-level tokenization and part-of-speech tagging, while
the large boxes show higher-level chunking. Each of these larger boxes is called a
chunk. Like tokenization, which omits whitespace, chunking usually selects a subset
of the tokens.
Also like tokenization, the pieces produced by a chunker do not overlap in the
source text.
Noun Phrase Chunking:
We will begin by considering the task of noun phrase chunking, or NP-chunking,
where we search for chunks corresponding to individual noun phrases. For example,
here is some Wall Street Journal text with NP-chunks marked using brackets:
[ The/DT market/NN ] for/IN [ system-management/NN software/NN ] for/IN
[ Digital/NNP ] [ 's/POS hardware/NN ] is/VBZ fragmented/JJ enough/RB that/IN
[ a/DT giant/NN ] such/JJ as/IN [ Computer/NNP Associates/NNPS ] should/MD do/VB
well/RB there/RB]
As we can see, NP-chunks are often smaller pieces than complete noun phrases. For
example, the market for system-management software for Digital's hardware is a
single noun phrase (containing two nested noun phrases), but it is captured in NP-
chunks by the simpler chunk the market. One of the motivations for this difference
is that NP-chunks are defined so as not to contain other NP-chunks. Consequently,
any prepositional phrases or subordinate clauses that modify a nominal will not be
included in the corresponding NP-chunk, since they almost certainly contain further
noun phrases.
Tag Patterns:
The rules that make up a chunk grammar use tag patterns to describe sequences of
tagged words. A tag pattern is a sequence of part-of-speech tags delimited using
angle brackets, e.g. <DT>?<JJ>*<NN>. Tag patterns are similar to regular expression
patterns (3.4). Now, consider the following noun phrases from the Wall Street
Journal:
another/DT sharp/JJ dive/NN
trade/NN figures/NNS
any/DT new/JJ policy/NN measures/NNS
earlier/JJR stages/NNS
Panamanian/JJ dictator/NN Manuel/NNP Noriega/NNP
We can match these noun phrases using a slight refinement of the first tag pattern
above, i.e. <DT>?<JJ.*>*<NN.*>+. This will chunk any sequence of tokens beginning
with an optional determiner, followed by zero or more adjectives of any type
(including relative adjectives like earlier/JJR), followed by one or more nouns of
any type. However, it is easy to find many more complicated examples which this
rule will not cover:
his/PRP$ Mansion/NNP House/NNP speech/NN
the/DT price/NN cutting/VBG
3/CD %/NN to/TO 4/CD %/NN
more/JJR than/IN 10/CD %/NN
the/DT fastest/JJS developing/VBG trends/NNS
's/POS skill/NN
Chinking:
Sometimes it is easier to define what we want to exclude from a chunk. We can
define a chink to be a sequence of tokens that is not included in a chunk. In the
following example, barked/VBD at/IN is a chink:
[ the/DT little/JJ yellow/JJ dog/NN ] barked/VBD at/IN [ the/DT cat/NN ]
we put the entire sentence into a single chunk, then excise the chinks.
grammar = r"""
NP:
{<.*>+} # Chunk everything
}<VBD|IN>+{ # Chink sequences of VBD and IN
"""
sentence = [("the", "DT"), ("little", "JJ"), ("yellow", "JJ"),
("dog", "NN"), ("barked", "VBD"), ("at", "IN"), ("the", "DT"), ("cat",
"NN")]
cp = nltk.RegexpParser(grammar
>>> print(cp.parse(sentence))
(S
(NP the/DT little/JJ yellow/JJ dog/NN)
barked/VBD
at/IN
(NP the/DT cat/NN))
Summary:
References:
http://www.nltk.org/book
The popularity of chunking is due in great part to pioneering work by Abney e.g.,
(Church, Young, & Bloothooft, 1996). Abney's Cass chunker is described in
http://www.vinartus.net/spa/97a.pdf.
The word chink initially meant a sequence of stopwords, according to a 1975 paper
by Ross and Tukey (Church, Young, & Bloothooft, 1996).
The IOB format (or sometimes BIO Format) was developed for NP chunking by (Ramshaw
& Marcus, 1995), and was used for the shared NP bracketing task run by the
Conference on Natural Language Learning (CoNLL) in 1999. The same format was
adopted by CoNLL 2000 for annotating a section of Wall Street Journal text as part
of a shared task on NP chunking.
If you are using photographs, each must have a scale marker, or scale bar, of
professional quality in one corner.
In photographs and figures, use color only when necessary when submitting to a
print publication. If different line styles can clarify the meaning, never use
colors or other thrilling effects or you will be charged with expensive fees.
Of course, this does not apply to online journals. For many journals, you can
submit duplicate figures: one in color for the online version of the journal and
pdfs, and another in black and white for the hardcopy journal.
Another common problem is the misuse of lines and histograms. Lines joining data
only can be used when presenting time series or consecutive samples data. However,
when there is no connection between samples or there is not a gradient, you must
use histograms.
References:
https://www.elsevier.com/connect/11-steps-to-structuring-a-science-paper-editors-
will-take-seriously
What is the best software for making and editing scientific images for publication
quality figures?
>> Tecplot(3D and animation)
>> Little tip
>> GraphPad
>> Powerpoint
>> Grapher
>> Smartdraw
>> Photo/bitmap editing
>> Matlab
>> drawio
References:
Researchgate.net
https://www.publishingcampus.elsevier.com
5. Start Strongly
The beginning of your presentation is crucial. You need to grab your audiences
attention and hold it.
They will give you a few minutes grace in which to entertain them, before they
start to switch off if youre dull. So dont waste that on explaining who you are.
Start by entertaining them.
Try a story (see tip 7 below), or an attention-grabbing (but useful) image on a
slide.
7. Tell Stories
Human beings are programmed to respond to stories.
Stories help us to pay attention, and also to remember things. If you can use
stories in your presentation, your audience is more likely to engage and to
remember your points afterwards. It is a good idea to start with a story, but there
is a wider point too: you need your presentation to act like a story.
Think about what story you are trying to tell your audience, and create your
presentation to tell it.
>>Finding The Story Behind Your Presentation
>>>To effectively tell a story, focus on using at least one of the two most basic
storytelling mechanics in your presentation:
1.Focusing On Characters People have stories; things, data, and objects do
not. So ask yourself who is directly involved in your topic that you can use as
the focal point of your story.
2.A Changing Dynamic A story needs something to change along the way. So ask
yourself What is not as it should be? and answer with what you are going to do
about it (or what you did about it).
Effective Speaking:
Your voice can reveal as much about your personal history as your appearance.
The sound of a voice and the content of speech can provide clues to an
individual's emotional state and a dialect can indicate their geographic roots.
The voice is unique to the person to whom it belongs.
Vocal Production:
The following three core elements of vocal production need to be understood for
anyone wishing to become an effective speaker:
>>Volume - to be heard.
>>Clarity - to be understood.
>>Variety - to add interest.
>>>Pace,Volume,Pitch - Inflection - Emphasis,Pause.
References:
1)https://www.skillsyouneed.com/present/presentation-tips.html
2)http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/education.html