Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Type of Television Owing: Graph 1
Type of Television Owing: Graph 1
Type of Television Owing: Graph 1
22%
L.G 75 30
SAMSUNG 53 21
BPL 72 29
OTHERS 50 20
SOURCE: primary data
INTERPRETATION:
30% say its LG, 29% say BPL and 21% of them say its SAMSUNG while
20% of them say other companies live demonstration is good.
GRAPH 2:
OTHERS L.G
BPL SAMSUNG
Source: Table no 3
TABLE 4:
L.G 73 29
SAMSUNG 77 31
BPL 65 26
OTHERS 35 14
SOURCE: primary data
INTERPRETATION:
31% of the customers say SAMSUNG, 29% of them say LG, 26% of the
customers say its BPL while 14% of them say its others.
GRAPH 3:
CUSTOMER EDUCATION
14% 29%
26%
31%
Source: Table no 4
TABLE 5:
Magazines 25 10
Television 180 72
FM Radio 7 3
Outdoor 38 15
SOURCE: primary data
INTERPRETATION:
72% of the customers say its television, 15% say outdoor, 10% say
magazines while 3% say its FM Radio.
GRAPH 4:
10%
3% 15%
72%
Source: Table no 5
TABLE 6:
Yes, always 75 30
INTERPRETATION:
46% of the customers say it depends on the brand name and 30% of
them say yes, always, while 24% of them say no, will go for the own brand.
GRAPH 5:
24% 30%
46%
Yes,always
Depend on the brand name
No, will go for the own brand
Source: Table no 6
TABLE 7:
Warranties 70 85 43 32 30
Tie-in 65 78 70 20 17
offers
SOURCE: primary data
INTERPRETATION:
23% of the customer say discount offer, 18% of them also say its warranties,
20% of them say exchange offer, 23% of them say prizes while 16% of them say
its Tie-in-offers.
GRAPH 6:
16% 20%
18%
22%
24%
Source: Table no 7
TABLE 8:
L.G 73 29
SAMSUNG 77 31
BPL 65 26
OTHERS 35 14
INTERPRETATION:
31% of the customers say its SAMSUNG, 29% of them say LG, 26% of
them say BPL, while 14% say others.
GRAPH 7:
14% 29%
26%
31%
Source: Table no 8
TABLE 9:
L.G 43 29
SAMSUNG 115 31
BPL 52 26
OTHERS 40 14
INTERPRETATION:
31% of the customers say its SAMSUNG, 29% of the customers say LG,
26% of them say BPL while 14% of them say its others.
GRAPH 8:
21%
46%
L.G SAMSUNG
Source: Table no 9
TABLE 10:
L.G 40 16
SAMSUNG 102 41
BPL 83 33
OTHERS 25 10
INTERPRETATION:
41% of the customers say its SAMSUNG, 33% of them say its BPL, 16% of
them say LG while 10% of them say its others.
GRAPH 9:
10% 16%
33%
41%
Source: Table no 10
TABLE 11:
Yes 180 72
No 70 28
INTERPRETATION:
Level of satisfaction
28%
72%
Yes No
Source: Table no 11
TABLE 12:
Brand image is 92 37
demanding
INTERPRETATION:
37% of the customers say brand image is demanding, 24% of them say
durable, 21% of them say prices are cheap and quality is good while 18% of
them say friendly sales team.
GRAPH 11:
Friendly
24% sales team
18%
Brand image
is
demanding
Source: Table no 12
CONCLUSION OF ANALYSIS
All the three companies that are LG, SAMSUMG, and B P L companies
will be able to face the steep competition from the local manufacturers who are
also quite competent with the Television manufacturing technology. Since price is
the main factor for most buyers, companies will be able to stay in the market with
competitive price and may be with a lower profit margin, which can be
compensated through flat screen. This technology is not readily available with the
local manufacturers.
Companies will be able to convince the customers in a dignified manner
rather than buying their minds through gift schemes.
SUGGESTIONS: