Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Farmakoepidemiologi
Farmakoepidemiologi
FARMAKOEPIDEMIOLOGI
Kuliah Farmasi Masyarakat - 2017
Definisi
pharmaco - drug or medicine
1
10/7/2017
The Relationship
Epidemiology Health
services Economics
research
Clinical
Epidemiology
Health
Economics
Outcomes
Research
Pharmaco-
epidemiology
(H Guess)
The Relationship
The study of
- Pharmacokinetics
the effects of
drugs in
Clinical pharmacology - Pharmacodynamics
humans
Focus of inquiry
Methods of inquiry
2
10/7/2017
AGENT ENVIRONMENT
(drug) (context of use)
= the cause of the = conditions affecting
disease / contagion / risk survival and transmission
factors of the causative agent
3
10/7/2017
Epidemiology Concepts
Epidemic
An outbreak of a disease, a sudden dramatic increase in the
number of people with the condition or health problem, usually
defined in term of a specific population in a geographic area during
some period
Endemic
The constant presence of a disease or infectious agent within a
given geographic area (or) the usual prevalence of a given
disease within such area.
Number of Epidemic
cases
Endemic
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Time
4
10/7/2017
Epidemiology Concepts
Mortality rate (MR)
The rapidity with which people in a given population die of a
particular condition
MR = per unit of time
Morbidity
The extend of disease, illness, injury, or disability in a defined
population
Usually expressed in terms of prevalence, attack rates or incidence
rates
ogy Concepts
10
Prevalence (P)
Probability that a condition exists in a specific population / probability
of the occurence of a condition
P=
5
10/7/2017
11
Drug Approval
Phase IV Post-marketing
12
6
10/7/2017
13
Controlled Uncontrolled
assignment assignment
Experimental Observational
studies studies
Community Individual
Descriptive Analytical
assignment assignment
Case-control Cohort
14
7
10/7/2017
15
1. Evidence-Based Medicine
The best drug therapy decisions based on sound
evidence
Evidence obtained from pharmacoepidemiological
studies medical literature
Medical literature:
Primer penelitian/studi yang dipublikasikan
Sekunder indexing system, contoh: pubmed
Tersier textbook, compendia, review article
Cochrane Database of Systematic Review
16
Hierarchies of Evidence
I : Properly randomized controlled trial
II-1a : Controlled trial with pseudo-randomization
II-1b : Controlled trial without randomization
II-2a : Cohort prospective study with concurrent controls
II-2b : Cohort prospective study with historical controls
II-2c : Cohort retrospective study with concurrent controls
II-3 : Case-control retrospective study
III : Large differences from comparisons between time and/or
places with and without intervention
IV : Opinion of respected authorities, based on clinical experience,
descriptive studies, or reports of expert commitees
8
10/7/2017
17
18
Sejarah
1961: Thalidomide disaster Phocomelia
9
10/7/2017
19
Tujuan PMS
1. Provide valuable information on the use of
drugs in special patient populations
pregnant & breast feeding women (teratogenic & mutagenic effects of
drugs)
the elderly
patients with multiple comorbidities
2. Long term monitoring of the effects of drugs
adverse drug reaction (ADR) rare ADR occur at rates of 1 in 10,000
or less
tolerance to drugs effects
3. Knowledge for broader application of medicine
new indication
doses & duration not studied before drug marketing
20
Macam PMS
Spontaneous Reporting System
Case Reports
Case-Control Studies
Cohort Studies
RCT
Database Research & Monitoring
Meta-Analyses
10
10/7/2017
21
22
11
10/7/2017
23
WHO
All reports are pooled to the WHO International Drug
Monitoring Project, Uppsala, Sweden
Aim:
To identify very rare but serious reaction as early as possible
24
MESO - Indonesia
Mengapa Indonesia harus melakukan MESO
(Monitoring Efek Samping Obat) sendiri?
Karena perbedaan ras, iklim, nutrisi, sifat-sifat demografi, dapat
mempengaruhi insidensi dan bentuk ESO
Data dari negara lain tidak selamanya dapat langsung dipakai di
Indonesia
Ada panitia MESO nasional yg bertugas:
Menerima laporan ESO
Menilai laporan ESO yg diterima
Menganalisa data hasil evaluasi
Memberikan rekomendasi tindak lanjut yang perlu dilakukan
Alamat: Badan POM
Jl. Percetakan Negara 23
Jakarta
12
10/7/2017
25
26
4. Farmakoekonomi
13
10/7/2017
27
What is Pharmacoeconomics
Research that identifies, measures and compares the
costs (resources consumed) and consequences of
pharmaceutical products and services
(Bootman et al, 1989)
28
What is Pharmacoeconomics
Research that identifies, measures and compares the
costs (resources consumed) and consequences of
pharmaceutical products and services
(Bootman et al, 1989)
14
10/7/2017
29
30
The Practice
Most industrialized countries government is the
primary payer for healthcare services including
prescription drugs
Pharmacoeconomic guideline by government
Australia, Canada, UK
Nongovernmental guideline US
Australia the first government to implement
pharmacoeconomic guidelines
Australian PBS regulates over 90% of outpatient
prescription dispensed in Australia
15
10/7/2017
31
Categories of Costs
Total Cost
32
Categories of Costs
Direct medical costs:
Associated with the drug and the medical care acquisition costs,
preparation costs, physicians fees, administration of medication, cost of
treating an ADR
E.g. Pharmaceuticals, hospital costs
Direct non-medical cost:
Those relevant to providing the therapy, including transportation to health
care facilities
E.g. Home assistance, travel
Indirect costs:
Result from lost of productivity (time off work due to sick leave)
E.g. Lost work days, early retirement, reduced productivity at work
Intangible costs:
Associated with pain and suffering of disease
E.g. Quality of life
16
10/7/2017
33
Perspective
The costs included depend on the perspective of the
evaluation
Perspective of the study should be stated
The point of view from which the study is conducted:
Patients
Providers (e.g. hospitals)
Payer (e.g. governments/insurers/employers)
Employer
Society (societal perspective)
34
Outcomes
Clinical outcome
The results of treatment with a drug (+/-)
Humanistic outcome
Look at therapy from patients points of view
How the patient feels, quality of life??
Economic outcome
Cost associated with a therapy
17
10/7/2017
35
Interpretation
More effective
Less effective
36
18
10/7/2017
Cost Analysis
Analysis the costs of using a pharmaceutical
The emphasis is on total costs of a treatment
Note: Acquisition cost of a pharmaceutical is a poor
predictor of the total cost
Does not compare treatments or evaluate the efficacy
Example:
Cost comparison of iv antibiotic administration
The costs of preparing and administering several iv
antibiotics in an Australian teaching hospital were
compared.
Standard regimens based on AB Guidelines
Cost included:
Acquisition cost of the drugs
Cost associated with drug delivery
Laboratory monitoring for potential toxicity
Plumridge RJ. Cost comparison of intravenous antibiotic administration. Medical Journal of Australia
1990; 153: 516-8
19
10/7/2017
Aminoglycosides
Amikacin 500mg 3 $34.82 $9.38 $1.66 $45.86 $137.58
Gentamicin 120mg 3 $0.92 $4.55 $1.66 $7.13 $21.39
Netilmicin 150mg 3 $10.02 $4.55 $1.66 $16.23 $46.69
Tobramycin 120mg 3 $7.20 $4.55 $1.66 $13.41 $40.23
Cephalosporins
Cefotaxime 2g 3 $18.50 $5.63 - $24.31 $72.39
Cefoxitin 2g 4 $19.22 $5.63 - $24.85 $99.40
..
Plumridge RJ. Cost comparison of intravenous antibiotic administration. Medical Journal of Australia
1990; 153: 516-8
20
10/7/2017
Ondansetron vs Tropisetron
Have equal effectiveness in reducing nausea and
vomiting
Outcomes are the same
Choose drug with the lowest total cost:
Acquisition cost of each drug
Consumables for administration
Medical and nursing time
21
10/7/2017
AE = adverse event
22
10/7/2017
Example
Misoprostol as prophylaxis for NSAID induced
ulcer
Ceftriaxone vs (Ampicillin + Gentamicin) for sepsis
Ceftriaxone vs Benzylpenicillin for Community
Acquired Pneumonia
23
10/7/2017
CUA
Similar to a CEA but incorporates a quality of life
component
CUA only suitable for the assessment of chronic diseases
(e.g. cancer, renal disease, diabetes, asthma) acute
conditions of short duration (e.g. infections) do not have
enough impact on quality of life
CUA include an assessment of the patients perception of
their condition and treatment
24
10/7/2017
CUA
Example:
Omeprazole vs Fundoplication for moderate to severe
oesophagitis:
Limitation of CUA
Not easy to obtain QOL information QOL assessments
for some conditions do not exist
25
10/7/2017
CBA
Example:
Prophylaxis of hepatitis A, typhoid and malaria in
travellers: a cost benefit analysis
26
10/7/2017
53
Comparison Table
Type Description Output Typical Unit
Cost Measures total cost of a Cost Currency
analysis healthcare program
CMA Compares 2 interventions (Potential) Currency
having equal efficacy cost saving
CEA Compares interventions with Cost per unit Currency per unit of
different health benefits of clinical outcome
outcome e.g. $ per mmHg drop in
BP
CUA Measures the cost per life-year Cost per unit Currency per unit of utility
gained, adjusted for quality of of utility e.g. cost per QALY
life
CBA Compares interventions with Benefit-to-cost A ratio or a total cost
different health outcomes, in ration, or saving in currency units
purely monetary terms (potential) cost
savings
54
27
10/7/2017
55
56
Effectiveness vs Efficacy
Efficacy is the consequence (benefit) of a treatment
under ideal and controlled clinical outcomes and is
the outcome that is measured in RCTs
Assess the benefit and harm of the intervention when all
other factors are controlled
All real live does not behave like an RCTs
Different types of patients, different treatment processes,
different dose, be monitored less intensively
Thus: the intervention is likely to be less effective
Effectiveness: is the therapeutics consequence of a
treatment in real-world conditions
Effectiveness often < than its efficacy
28
10/7/2017
57
58
Pustaka
Elliott R and Payne K. 2005. Essentials of Economic
Evaluation in Healthcare. Pharmaceutical Press
Bootman JL, Townsend RJ, and McGhan WF. 1996.
Principles of Pharmacoeconomics. 3rd Edition. Harvey
Whitney
Strom BL. 2000. Pharmacoepidemiology. 3rd Ed. John
Wiley & Sons, pp. 3-15
Waning B, Montagne M. 2001. Pharmacoepidemiology:
Principles and Practice. Mc Graw Hill. pp. 1-15, 131-141,
143-157, 159-167
29