Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lutz V Araneta GR No L-7859 December 22, 1955
Lutz V Araneta GR No L-7859 December 22, 1955
Lutz v Araneta
GR No L-7859 December 22, 1955
HELD:
Yes. The tax is levied with a regulatory purpose, i.e. to provide
means for the rehabilitation and stabilization of the threatened
sugar industry. The act is primarily an exercise of police power
and is not a pure exercise of taxing power.
As sugar production is one of the great industries of the
Philippines and its promotion, protection and advancement
redounds greatly to the general welfare, the legislature found
that the general welfare demanded that the industry should be
stabilized, and provided that the distribution of benefits had to
sustain.
Further, it cannot be said that the devotion of tax money to
experimental stations to seek increase of efficiency in sugar
production, utilization of by-products, etc., as well as to the
improvement of living and working conditions in sugar mills
and plantations without any part of such money being
channeled directly to private persons, constitute expenditure of
tax money for private purposes.
Hence, the tax is valid.