Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Headed Bolt Anchor Design PDF
Headed Bolt Anchor Design PDF
1 Given Parameters
Concrete Depth; = 18
Seismic Design Category;
Y
Concrete is assumed to be cracked
Anchor Material : ASTM F1554 Grade 36
= 58000 X
= 105000
, = 0.142 2
= 0.291 2
= 4000
Loading eccentricities
= 1
= 1
Axial Tension; = 8
Axial Shear Force along X axis
= 0
Axial Shear Force along Y axis;
= 6
2 Tension in Anchors
1 = 1 =
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
3 = 5 ( 3 + 12) 8 = 8 =
3 12 = =
2 6 24 2 3 24 3 24
2 8
1
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
= + =
8 24 12 8 24 6
5
= + =
6 24 8 6 24 24
5 5
= + =
24 24 6 24 24 4
8
= = 2
4 4
Tensile component of the strength level earthquake forces applied to anchors exceeds 20%
of the total factored anchor tensile force. Hence, we have to design in accordance with
17.2.3.4.3 and corresponding strengths will be determined in accordance with 17.2.3.4.4
17.2.3.4.2
4 Failure Modes
4.1. Steel strength of anchor in tension (17.4.1)
= , Eq. 17.4.1.2
, = 0.142 2
= 58000
2
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
Edge distance to the anchors are 4 , 4 and 28 from three sides. ...17.4.2.3
1.5 = 1.5 12 = 18
Since only 2 edges are less than 1.5 , full will be taken
a) Calculate
2
= 9 = 9 122 = 1296 2 Eq. 17.4.2.1c
Fig. R17.4.2.1
3
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
b) Calculate
= (1.5 + 1 + 1 ) (1.5 + 2 + 2 + 2 )
= (1.5 12 + 8 + 4) (1.5 12 + 6 + 6 + 4) = 1020 2
Since, for our case all the anchors are in tension, the eccentricity will remain same
which can also be calculated as below:
5
(12 6 + 8 24 + 6 4 )
= 4 = 1
5
12 + 8 + 6 + 6 + 24 + 4
4
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
, = min(4, 4, 20) = 4
,
, = 0.7 + 0.3 ( ) = 0.77
1.5
= 1.5
Eq. 17.4.2.2a
5
Then, = 16
3
Eq. 17.4.2.2b
5
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
1020
= 0.897 0.77 1 1 63.65 = 34.6
1296
The anchor design tensile strength for resisting earthquake forces shall be determined by
0.75 17.2.3.4.4b
8
Strength utilization = 18.165 = 0.44
4.3. Pullout strength if cast-in, post installed expansion and undercut anchors
in tension (17.4.3)
Nominal pullout strength of single cast-in, post installed expansion and post installed
undercut anchor in tension, , shall not exceed.
= ,
= 8 Eq. 17.4.3.4
= 8 0.291 4 = 9.3120
Design strength = 0.75 for a single anchor, or the most highly stressed individual
anchor in a group of anchors. 17.2.3.4.4c
6
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
2
Strength utilization = 4.89 = 0.41
This will be same along both axis as 1 = 4 , along both the axis.
For multiple headed anchors with deep embedment close to an edge and with anchor
spacing 8 ( ) < 61 = 24 . 17.4.4.2
= (1 + )
61
where is the distance between the outer anchors along the edge, and is obtained
from before without modification for a perpendicular edge distance.
7
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
Along y-axis, the bottom most row, i.e. anchors 1 and 2, resist side-face blowout. Total
5
tension shared by this row = 6 + 4 = 12
12
So, the nominal side-face blowout strength along y-axis = 29.07 = 69.77
5
8
Strength utilization = 27.46 = 0.29
For a group
= , , , , 17.5.2.1(b)
8
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
Since = 6 1,1 = 4 ; so we can distribute the shear force on each of the anchors.
Forces acting at the centroid of the plate will be the shear acting in negative Y direction and
its corresponding torsion due to the eccentricity in positive X direction.
6
= = 1
6 6
Due to Torsion of = 6 1 = 6
9
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
Where, = 2 and from static equilibrium we know
2 2 + = Eq-1
= Eq-2
From all the above equations it can be derived that
= 2 2
= = 0.1
8 + 60
Horizontal component of R will generate forces in horizontal direction over the anchors 1, 2,
5 and 6.
= = 2 = 0.15
So, neglecting X direction forces, and adding up forces in Y direction for both the effects,
10
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
2
a) 0 = 4.51,1 = 4.5 42 = 72 2
11
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
b)
= 18 > 1.5 1,1 = 6 OK
= 1.51,1 (1.51,1 + + 1,2 ) = 6 (6 + 8 + 4) = 6 18 = 108 2
0.2
= min {7 ( ) (1 )1.5 , 9 (1 )1.5 }
Eq.17.5.2.2.a & b
where, = min( , 8 ) = 4 and = 1
= 3.8
1
, = ( )1
2
1 + 3
1
Taking the revised eccentricity based on the distribution of shear and torsion in Y
direction.
, = 0.4
, = 0.9375
e) , : modification factor for edge effect for a single anchor or a group of anchors
loaded in shear. 17.5.2.6
2
, = 0.7 + 0.3 ( ) = 0.9
1.51
12
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
a) 0 = 72 2
b) = (4 + 6 + 6 + 6) 6 = 132 2
e) , = 1
f) , = 1
g) =
0.2
min {7 ( )
(1 )1.5 , 9 (1 )1.5 } =
3.8
132
= 72
1 1 1 3.8 = 6.96
3.3
Strength utilization = = = 0.32
10.44
13
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
Since, < 2,1 (6 < 10) ; So it would not be conservative to consider breakout against the load
distributed to all the active anchors. So, we shall check for concrete breakout by applying the entire load
on the second row of anchors (CASE 3) Fig. R17.5.2.1b
14
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
b) = (15 + 8 + 4) 15 = 405 2
1
c) , = ( 2
) 1 = 0.94
1+
31
2
d) , = 0.7 + 0.3 (1.5 ) = 0.78
1
f) , = 1
0.2
g) = min {7 ( ) (1 )1.5 , 9 (1 )1.5 } = 15.05
405
= 0.94 0.78 1 1 15.05 = 9.93
450
15
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
a) 0 = 72 2
b) = (3 4) 6 = 72 2
e) , = 1
f) , = 1
g) =
0.2
min {7 ( )
(1 )1.5 , 9 (1 )1.5 } =
3.8
1 = 4
72
= 1 1 1 3.8 = 3.8
72
16
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
min(1.9 , 125000)
= 58000
58000
= 0.6 0.142 = 4.94
1000
Due to Torsion
17
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
6 6
2 2 = 6 ; = ; = =0.3
4 432 +42
4
= = = 0.24
3
= = = 0.18
6
Due to shear all the anchors will carry a force of 4 = 1.5
20.248
Revised eccentricity = = 0.64
6
Design strength of the most stressed anchor = = 0.65 4.94 = 3.21
17.3.3(a)
18
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
=
Eq. 17.5.3.1b
For cast-in anchors = , concrete breakout strength in tension. Eq. 17.4.2.1b
From 6.1 we know that the revised eccentricity for shear along Y due to combined action of
shear and torsion is = 0.4 . So,
1
, = = 0.98
2 0.4
1 + 3 12
1020
= 0.98 0.77 1 1 63.65 = 37.8
1296
Since, = 12 2.5 ; = 2
= 2 37.8 = 75.6
19
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
a) For a group of anchors; the ratio of tensile load on the most highly stressed anchor to
the steel strength of that anchor shall be equal to or greater than the ratio of tensile
load on tension loaded anchors to the concrete governed strength of those anchors.
Concrete governed strength will be the nominal strength considering pullout, side-
face blowout and concrete breakout. 17.2.3.4.3a (ii)
(i) Pullout: For consideration of pullout in groups, the ratio shall be calculated
for the most highly stressed anchor.
= 9.312
Tensile load on most highly stressed anchor (Anchor No. 2) = 2
2
Utilization ratio for pullout = 9.312 = 0.215
Hence, our mode of failure is brittle. So we need to check other options b,c, and d
20
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
6 Summary
+ 1.2
All the results have been verified using Quick Anchor, software by S K Ghosh Associates, which provides
detailed calculations at each and every step. The numbers got are within the same range as that from
the software.
21