Example-Site Investigation Factual Report

OWNER REFERENCE
Project Package Originator Discipline Doc. Type Unit n Serial n

SUB12-
RAPID FE1 CVS ERP 0001 0002
GLB
CONTRACTOR REFERENCE Rev. Page
PETRONAS RAPID PROJECT Project Unit n Doc. Type Doc. Code Sequent. n
FEED PHASE B 3 / 30
Factual Report Additional Soil Investigation Works for RAPID Project Refinery Process Area
TABLE OF CONTENT
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 6
2.0 SCOPE OF WORKS .............................................................................. 6
3.0 FIELD EXPLORATION ........................................................................ 7

3.1 General ....................................................................................... 7
3.2 Deep Boring................................................................................. 7
3.2.1 Deep Boring Equipment .................................................. 7
3.2.2 Method of Advancing Borehole ...................................... 7
3.2.3 Sampling In Borehole ...................................................... 8
i. Disturbed sample ................................................. 8
ii. Undistured Sampling ........................................... 8
iii. Rock Sample ........................................................ 8
iv. Ground Water Sampling ...................................... 9
v. Water Tabel Measurement .................................. 9
3.3 Field Testing ................................................................................ 10

3.3.1 Standard Penetration Test ................................................ 10
3.3.2 Vane Shear Field Test...................................................... 10
3.4 Trial Pits ...................................................................................... 11
3.5 Cone Penetration Test.................................................................. 11
3.6 Earth Resistivity Test .................................................................. 12
3.7 Thermal Resistivity ..................................................................... 13
3.8 Downhole PS Logging ................................................................ 13
4.0 LABORATORY TESTING .................................................................... 14

4.1 Classification Test ......................................................................... 14
a. Natural Moisture Content ........................................................ 14
b. Bulk and Dry Density .............................................................. 15
Subject to the provision of Article 13 of the CONTRACT, TECHNIP hereby grant PETRONAS the copyright of this document. No part of this document may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the
copyright owner.
CONFIDENTIAL Not to disclose without authorization

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
FEED PHASE B 4 / 30
c. Particle Size Distributions ....................................................... 15

d. Atterberg Limits Determinations ............................................. 15
e. Linear Shrinkage ..................................................................... 15
f. Specific Gravity ....................................................................... 16
4.2 Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test.............. 16
4.3 Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test................... 16
4.4 One Dimensional Consolidation Test .......................................... 16
4.5 Point Load Test ........................................................................... 17
4.6 Uniaxial Compressive Strength Test on Rock ............................ 17
4.7 Compaction Test .......................................................................... 17
4.8 Chemical Test .............................................................................. 18
a. PH Test .................................................................................... 18
b. Organic Matter Content .......................................................... 18
c. Sulphate Content ..................................................................... 18
d. Chloride Content ..................................................................... 18
5.0 COMMENTARY ..................................................................................... 19
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
FEED PHASE B 5 / 30
APPENDICES
Appendix A - Site Plan

Appendix B - Additional Soil Investigation As-Built Layout Plan
Refinery Process Area
Appendix C - Engineering Logs with Borehole Location &
Sample Photographs
Appendix D - Field Vane Shear Test and Calibration Certificate
Appendix E - Trial Pits
Appendix F - Cone Penetration Test
Appendix G - Earth Resistivity Test
Appendix H - Thermal Conductivity / Thermal Resistivity Result
Appendix I - Downhole PS Logging Results
Appendix J - Summary and Laboratory Test Results
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
FEED PHASE B 6 / 30
1.0 INTRODUCTION.
This report presents the result of the subsurface exploration for Additional Soil Investigation
Factual Report For Rapid Project Refinery Process Area.
The work was carried out in accordance with the drawings and specifications given by the
Personnel of Messrs. Technip Geoproduction (M) Sdn Bhd. The site investigation works was
carried out accordance to the British Standard Code of Practice BS 5930: 1999 Code Practice
for Site Investigation and laboratory tests as per BS 1377: 1990 or otherwise instructed by the
client or mentioned in this report.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORKS
The scope of works involved in this investigation includes the following: -
1. To explore the subsurface condition of proposed development area and to provide

general data relating to the project.
2. To carry out Standard Penetration Test (SPT 63.5kg hammer having a free fall of
760mm) to determine the natural bearing resistance of the subsoil.
3. To obtain disturbed and undisturbed soil samples for carrying out the laboratory tests to
determine the natural and relevant physical properties of the subsoil pertaining to the
site.
4. To carry out Field Vane Shear Test to measure the in-situ shear strength of the soil.
5. To carry out Trial Pits Test to observe the true soil conditions.
6. To carry out Cone Penetration Test to determine the Engineering Parameters of

the existing soil.
7. To carry out Earth Resistivity Test in getting the knowledge for the necessary
earthing installation.
8. To carry out the Thermal Resistivity for the purpose ensuring the safe design of buried
high voltage electric cable.
9. To carry out the Downhole PS logging survey to obtain the geophysical properties of
soil at sites.
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
FEED PHASE B 7 / 30
3.0 FIELD EXPLORATION.
3.1 GENERAL
Field exploration programme was conducted during the period of 05th August 2013 to
26th August 2013. The programme was supervised by our personnel from our office.
The exploration of works involved in this investigation includes :
a) Thirty Eight (38) numbers of Borehole

b) Two (2) numbers of Vane Shear Test
c) Four (4) numbers of Cone Penetration Test
d) Seven (7) numbers of Thermal Conductivity Test
e) Five (5) numbers of Electrical Resistivity Test
f) Two (2) numbers of Trial Pits Test
g) One (1) number of Downhole PS Logging Test
to be done for the design of the foundation for the proposed project.
3.2 DEEP BORING
3.2.1 Deep Boring Equipment
The Boring equipment used was Rotary Drilling Rig which is capable of
boring and drilling to the depth about 120 meters. These boring rigs are also
suitable for advancing the borehole, sampling, in-situ testing and rock drilling in
accordance with the relevant specifications of each of these operations.
3.2.2 Method of Advancing Boreholes
Soil drill was carried out by the rotary action of drill bit attached to the bottom
of a hollow rod, which cuts/discharges all material within the diameter of
borehole washed to the ground surface by drilling fluid pumped down the
drilling rod. Normally the drill bit is rarely allowed to extend more than 150mm
ahead of the bottom of the casing (if casing is used). Advancing of the borehole
is using drill rods with suitable drill bit and casing or where permitted, proper
drilling fluids. Advancing of the borehole will be such that the disturbance to
and contamination of the soil(s) immediately below the borehole will be kept to
minimum.
Casing was required in the soft or cohesionless soils, but is often omitted in
stiff, cohesive soils when only small representative samples are desired.
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
FEED PHASE B 8 / 30
3.2.3 Sampling in Boreholes
i. Disturbed Sample
Disturbed samples may be obtained by any means as long as the soil sample
obtained is representative and unchanged in the constituent contents. After
the completion of the test, the sampler tube is removed and disassembled to
provide disturbed but representative samples.
Disturbed samples were taken from continuous sampling and split barrel
samples in conjunction with penetration resistance tests for purpose of
laboratory soil classification.
Disturbed samples were normally preserved immediately after being

recovered in doubled layered heavy polyethylene bags sealed to form an
airtight bag. Properly contained samples were stored under a shelter away
from the sun and rain.
ii. Undisturbed Sample
Undisturbed samples were taken with thin-wall tube sampler or stationary

piston sampler as according to the site conditions or as directed. The
minimum internal diameter of the tube used was 75mm and the minimum
length of the tube was 1000mm.
A minimum of 10.0mm of undisturbed materials was removed from the top
and the bottom of the tube to take up a jar sample for both the top and
bottom. Subsequent to the penetration of these samples, both ends of the
sample will be coated with a non-shrinking wax to ensure airtight seal. The
void at the top and bottom of the tube was then filled.
iii. Rock Sample
The procedure for rock drilling shall be in accordance with British Standard
Code of Practice BS 5930 Site Investigation. The diameter of core
acceptable shall be 54.00mm diameter (NMLC or NWX, NWM core barrels
where X and M refers to the design of corebit).
The Total Core Recovery (TCR) mean the ratio of the total length of good
quality core over the drilling length expressed the nearest 5%. Rock Quality
Designation (RQD) was the ratio of the total length of the good quality core
each exceeding 100mm in length over the drilling run correct to circular
circumference or in the case of broken rock fragment assembled to form
cores with circular circumference.
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
FEED PHASE B 9 / 30
iv. Ground Water Sampling
Ground water sample taken in accordance with BS 5930: Section 23.3

Groundwater samples on each occasion that ground water is encountered
during boring. In all type of boring where water is added groundwater
samples should be collected when directed by the Employer, by first
removing all water from the borehole by pumping or bailing, then taking a
groundwater sample from the water which collects by seepage.
Approximately 1.0 litre of water should be collected and stored in a clear

inert plastic bottle, rinsing the bottle three times with the water being
sampled before filling. The groundwater sample shall sensibly fill the bottle
which shall be sealed with a water-tight screw cap and transported to the lab
within 3 days.
v. Water Table Measurement
The measurement of water table in the boreholes was done using either a
measuring tape or tape rod diameter or dip-meter as directed by the Client.
The recordings were repeated daily while boring for the drilled hole in
progress and were taken in the following time intervals: -
1. Before work commences in the morning

2. At the end of the days work.
The water levels recorded in the borehole logs were levels observed in these
investigation holes during the period of the site investigation. Such
observed levels may not necessarily be the actual groundwater levels that
are subject to seasonal fluctuations from time to time.
For boreholes involving impervious stratum, the casing top was capped
overnight to prevent entry of rainwater and subsurface water.
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
FEED PHASE B 10 / 30
3.3 Field Testing
3.3.1 Standard Penetration Test
Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) was carried in accordance with BS 1377-

9:1990, 3.3. Determination of the penetration resistance using a split barrel
sampler and a self-tripping hammer of approved design.
Generally, is carried out in all types of soil except the very soft and soft clays, at
1.5m intervals or change of strata or as instructed by the S.O. representative. In
case of soft clay, vane shear test shall be carried out instead of the SPT.
The value of the N as defined in the B.S. method was reported together with the
number of blow counts for each 75mm penetration of the sampling tube. The
blow counts for the first 150mm penetration (the seating drive) which do not
contribute the value of N was also included.
Two examples are 2,3,6,7,10,19 will give N=42 and 10,12,35 15/25mm will
give N=50/100mm. When a penetration resistance of 50 blows or 150mm
penetration was encountered in a seating drive, the test would stop and the SPT
value would be N*=50/150mm. The soil samples recovered from the split barrel
were preserved as disturbed samples as disturbed samples for subsequent
testing.
3.3.2 Field Vane Shear Test
Vane test shall be carried out in accordance to BS 1377: 1990 Determination

of shear strength in the field by the vane test. The field vane shear test gives
values of the consolidated undrained shear strength of the soil on site. In general
it shall be carried out in very soft to stiff non-fissured cohesive soils. Each
operation shall include the determination of both the undisturbed and remoulded
strength.
The vane is forced into the ground either from the ground surface or from the
bottom of a borehole. For penetration vane testing, the vane is housed in a
protective shoe to protect it from damage by stones or obstructions. At the
desired depth, the vane is pushed a short distance out of the housing into the
undisturbed soil by means of the torque rod, which runs inside the extension
tube to the surface. Once the vane is in position, a torque is applied through the
extension rod.
The readings were converted to kN/m2 by using the calibration graph attached
in Appendix D. The dimension of the vane used was 65.00mm diameter and
110.00mm in length. The final results, Su, of various depths were presented in
Appendix D - Field Vane Shear Test Results.
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
3.4 Trial Pit
Shallow trial pits provide an economical method of examining in-situ conditions.

Exploration depths are between 2 and 4m, and therefore require temporary support if
personnel are to enter them. Reference should be made to BS5573 for the safety
precautions required. Investigation is normally limited to levels above the groundwater in
non-cohesive soils.
The excavation of trial pits or trenches is often the most efficient method for observing
the true soil conditions. Disturbed soil is more likely to be recognised, particularly
backfill. A trial pits can also be used for more intensive in-situ testing where necessary.
Colour photographs of side faces should be taken whenever possible, with a prominent
scale marker, and a method of identifying the photographed face on the key plan. Where
sampling is necessary, it can be carried out either from disturbed samples obtained by
excavation, or open-tubes driven into the base or side face. The exact location and
orientation of the sample relative to the pit floor and walls must be recorded.
3.5 Cone Penetration Test
The equipment used for the piezocone test follows the British Standard Code of Practice
BS 1377 : Part 9 : 1990 and the International Reference Test Procedure for the Cone
Penetration Test (CPT).
The cone has transducers to measure cone resistance, local friction, water pressure and
uniaxial inclination. Cones are calibrated by manufacturer. A filter element
(Polypropylene) with diameter 35mm one size located in the cylindrical extension above
the base of the cone allows the pore water pressure generated during the penetration to be
measured by means of a pressure transducer located in the piezometer tip (u2 type cone).
In order to ensure that pore pressure measurements are not affected by the presence of air
in the measuring transducer, a de-airing procedure is carried out as required. The filters
are saturated by de-aired silicon or glycerin. A new filter is recommended for each
sounding location. Please note that following the initial de-airing procedure, it will only be
repeated if the cone is removed from the water into air, or at the beginning of each
working day, whichever is first.
The data acquisition system is Geomils GME 500 acquisition system. Signals from the
cone are transmitted to the GME 500 system via a cable threaded through the sounding
tubes. Depth registration is provided by an event marker activated via the action of the
hydraulic rams. The equipment provides:
a. A continuous listing (10 mm interval) of all measured parameters (cone resistance, local
friction, pore water pressure and inclination) recorded inside computer memory.
b. Graphical presentation of measured parameters at any scale required.
c. Resolution of the measured parameter is:-
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
Cone resistance : 0.01 Mpa

Local friction : 0.1 kPa
Pore water pressure : 1 kPa
Inclination : 0.1 degrees
The jacking unit is a 100 KN twin cylinder hydraulic ram with 120 KN upward forces.
The jacks, data acquisition and all accessories are mounted on a self-propelled crawler
chassis. The total weight of the unit is approximately 20 ton, additional reaction can be
provided by screw anchors installed using a hydraulic turning device.
3.6 Earth Resistivity Test
The method use to carry out the test was Wenner 4 pin method. The common test type is
shown in Figure 3-1. The Wenner four pin methods is considered more accurate and
economic than the other methods, provided a current source of sufficient power is used.
Figure 3-1
Readings are usually taken at probe spacing of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 20m. If the testing is
being performed for the purposes of ground potential rise (GPR) studies or for substation
design, readings up to 30 meter probe spacing should be performed. The calculated soil
resistivity is the average of the soil Resistivity from the surface to a depth equivalent to
the probe spacing. For example, a probe spacing of 20 metre between each probe will
provide the average soil resistivity between the surface and a depth of 20 metre.
In homogeneous isotropic earth the resistivity will be constant. However, if the earth is
non-homogeneous and the electrode spacing varied, a different value of resistivity (a)
will be found for each measurement. This measured value of resistivity is known as the
apparent resistivity. The apparent resistivity is a function of the array geometry, measured
voltage (v), and injected current (I).
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
For the arrays described in the previous section the apparent resistivity is found from the
field measurements using the following formulae.
Where aw : apparent resistivity ()

a : probe spacing (m)
v : voltage measured (volts)
I : injected current (Amps)
R : measured resistance ()
The field measurement data and result are presented in Appendix G.
3.6 Thermal Resistivity
The purpose of the soil thermal conductivity and temperature measurement is for the
purpose of ensuring the safe design of the buried high voltage electric cable. The
measurements are carried out at the locations specified by the client and at various depths
as required by clients instruction.
Thermal Resistivity conducted during 16th September 2013 until 22nd September 2013.
The results presented in Appendix H Thermal Conductivity / Thermal Resistivity
Result.
3.7 Downhole PS Logging Survey
The purpose of this geophysical investigation is to obtain geophysical properties of the

soil at sites. Geophysical test were performed to obtain the P-wave and S-wave velocities
of the soil strata. The results provide the designer with the information pertinent to the
seismic wave velocities of the materials. The data may be used as input into
static/dynamic analysis, as means for computing Shear modulus, Youngs modulus and
Poissons ratio. The test method is complying to ASTM D7400.
Downhole PS Logging survey conducted during the period of 20th October 2012 to 23rd
October 2012.
The results of the Downhole PS Logging Survey as presented in Appendix I

Downhole PS Logging Survey.
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
4.0 LABORATORY TESTING
Both disturbed and undisturbed samples were obtained at various depths and at every change of
soil strata for the purpose of identification, classification and testing. The following laboratory
tests were carried out in our laboratory in accordance with the British Standard Code 1377:
1990.
The tests consisted of: -
1. Soil Classification Test

a. Natural Moisture Content
b. Bulk and Dry Density
c. Particles Size Distributions.
d. Atterberg Limits Determination.
e. Linear Shrinkage
f. Specific Gravity
2. Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Test

3. Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test
4. One Dimensional Consolidation Test
5. Point Load Test
6. Uniaxial Compression Strength Test On Rock
7. Compaction Test
8. Chemical Test
a. PH Test
b. Organic Matter Content
c. Sulphate Content
d. Chloride Content
The results of the laboratory soil test are summarised in the Summary of Laboratory Test Result
as presented in Appendix J.
4.1 Soil Classification Test
Soil Classification Test was conducted in accordance to BS: 1377. Soil Classification Test
was determined of basic physical properties. The tests are required for the classification
of soil in accordance with BS 5930. The test was included as follow:-
a. Natural Moisture Content
Moisture content and dry density determination were performed on numerous

samples in order to provide an identification of the relevant strength of the samples
and for correlation of sample type.
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
b. Bulk And Dry Density
This test follows BS 1377: Part 2: 1990 Method 7. The bulk density of a soil is the
mass per unit volume of the soil including any water it contains, expressed in
Mg/m3. The linear measurement method 7.2 was used in this project for sample
obtained from undisturbed sampling method.
c. Particle Size Distribution.
A sieve analysis consists of shaking the soil through a stack of wire screens with
opening of known sizes: the definition of particle diameter for a sieve test is,
therefore, the side dimensions of a square hole. The hydrometer method is based on
strokes equation for the velocity of a freely falling sphere: the definition of particle
diameter for hydrometer test is, therefore the diameter of a sphere of the same
density, which falls at the same velocity, as the particle is question. The test
procedure, which should be followed, depends on the soil in question. If nearly all it
grains are so large that they cannot pass through the square openings at 0.074mm
(No. 200 screen), the sieve analysis is preferable. For those soils, which are nearly
all finer than a No. 200 screen, the hydrometer test is recommended. Grained size
analysis has been widely used as a mean for identification and classification of soils.
d. Atterberg Limit
Atterberg Limit Determination Test was conducted in accordance to BS: 1377: Part
2: 1990 Test 4 & 5. The Liquid & Plastic Limit was determined to furnish basis for
the classification and identification of fine-grained cohesive soils. The liquid limit
defines the boundary lectures the liquid and plastic states. It is the water content at
which the soil has such smaller shear strength that it flows to close grove of
standard width (13mm) when jarred in a specific manner. The plastic limit defines
the boundary between the plastic and semi-solid states; it is the water content at
which the soil begins to crumble when rolls into threads of specific size (3mm). The
amount of water which must be added to change a soil from its plastic limit to its
liquid limit is measured by the Plasticity Index which is equal to the limit minus
the plastic limit. The natural moisture content at the time of testing was also
presented in the data.
e. Linear Shrinkage
Linear Shrinkage can be defined as the change in the length of a bar sample of soil
when dried (soil sample passing through 425m sieve test), from its Liquid Limit,
expressed as percentage (%) of the initial length ( l0 ). It can be used for soil of low
plasticity including silts, as well as for clays. The test can be calculated from the
equation:-
Linear Shrinkage (%) = ( 1 LD ) x 100

c LO
Where, LO = Initial length, LD = Length of dried specimen. This test is conducted to

BS 1377: Part2: 1990, Method 6.
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
f. Specific Gravity
Specific Gravity of soil is determined of particle density, Ps. The procedure of

particle density, described is applicable for soils composed of particles finer than
2.0mm in size. That is usually referred to the specific gravity of mineral grains (soil
solids), is defined as:-
W = Unit Weight of Soil Solid Only

Unit Weight of Water
The procedure of Specific Gravity is accordance with BS 1377: Part 2: 1990

(Method 8).
4.2 Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test
The Triaxial Test without measurement of pore-water pressure is carried out in

accordance with BS: 1377:1990 using cylindrical soil specimen of diameter 38mm and
height 76mm. The sample is fitted between solid end caps so that drainage is prevented.
After the all-round cell pressure has been established. The axial load increased is begin
immediately. The increased in deviator stress fairly rapid, allowing no dissipation of pore
water pressure and since no drainage is allowed and no pore pressure measurements are
taken, the results can only be expressed in terms of total stress. The duration of the test
will be about 10 to 15 minutes. Mohrs circles using the major and minor principle
stresses are then plotted on graph of shear stress versus normal stress and the Undrained
apparent cohesion C and the angle of shearing resistance determined.
4.3 Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test
Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test with pore watering pressure

measurements is carried out according to BS 1377: part 8, Method 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.
Testing is carried out on either a set of 3 x 38mm, x 50mm, or 70mm, diameter specimens
whichever is specified. The test procedure involves the successive saturation,
consolidation and shearing stages of each of the three specimens.
4.4 One Dimension Consolidation Test
The odometer consolidation test is used for the determination of the consolidation
characteristics of soil of low permeability. Two parameter normally required are :-
The compressibility of the soil (expressed in terms of the coefficient of volume change)
which is measure of the amount by which the soil will compress when loaded and allowed
consolidating.
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
The time related parameter (expressed in terms of coefficient of consolidation) which

indicates the tare of compression and hence the time period over which consolidation
settlement will take place.
The test is carried out by applying a sequence of five vertical loading and two unloading
to laterally confined specimen having a height of 20mm, and 50mm diameter. The
vertical compression under each load is observed over a period of time. Since no lateral
deformation is allowed, it is a One Dimensional Test, from which the One Dimensional
Consolidation parameter are derived, other parameters that are determined from the test
are the pre-compressions stress, Pc and compressions index Cc.
4.4 Point Load Test
Point load test is an indirect method to determine unixial compressive strength (UCS) of
a sample. Sample is placed in between conical steel platens and loaded under
compression. Using correlation UCS 20 x Is (ISRM, 1985) , point load strength is
converted to unixial compressive strength. Equipment used is ELE (England) Point Load
apparatus. Testing procedures are as ISRM (1985) and samples tested were irregular
blocks of suitable size.
4.5 Uniaxial Compression Strength Test On Rock
Uniaxial compressive strength test of intact rock often needed properties in engineering
designs of structures in rock. The test is carried out on intact rock with no discontinuities
and yields data on the rock materials properties. The length to diameter ratio of 2:1 is a
minimum for cylinders.
4.6 Compaction Test
The Compaction Test is carried out to obtain relationships between compacted dry
density and soil moisture content, using two magnitudes of manual compactive effort, or
compaction by vibration. The method of this test is referred to BS 1377: 1990: Part 4.
Compaction of soil is the process by which the solid particles are packed more closely
together, usually by mechanical means, thereby increasing the dry density of the soil. The
dry density which can be achieved depends on the degree of compaction applied and on
the amount of water present in the soil. For a given degree of compaction of a given
cohesive soil there is an optimum moisture content at which the dry density obtained
reaches a maximum value. For cohesionless soils, optimum moisture content might be
difficult to define.
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
4.7 Chemical Test
Chemical Test was conducted in accordance to BS: 1377: Part 3: 1990.The test was
included as follow:-
a. PH Test
The PH Test was carried out in accordance with BS: 1377: Part 3 :1990 to
determine the PH value by electrometric method, which gives direct reading of the
pH value of a soil suspension water.
b. Organic Matter Content
The organic matter content is carried out in accordance with BS: 1377: Part 3:
1990. The procedure covers the determination of the percentage by dry mass of
organic matters present in soil. The method, which uses dichromate oxidation, is
known as Walkley and Blacks method.
c. Sulphate Content
The sulphate content test is carried out in accordance with BS: 1377: Part 3:
1990. The procedures for determining the sulphate content of soil and ground
water. The results obtained give the sulphate content at the time of sampling only.
There are two methods for determining the sulphate contents of aggregate either
water-soluble sulphate content or total sulphate content.
d. Chloride Content
The chloride content test is carried out in accordance with BS: 1377:
Part 3: 1990. The test was carried out for determination of water-soluble and acid-
soluble chloride salt content in soil. Both procedures are based on Voldards
Method.
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
5.0 COMMENTARY
The classification of the soil as represented in the report follows the BS 5930: 1981 Section 6
Description of soil and rocks.
It must be pointed out that, where the description of the samples from the laboratory results
differ from the field description of the soil layers, the laboratory results was supplemented and
in some instances, superseded the field description. The report is limited to the representation of
the soil information data gathered from the field works and laboratory test results. It should be
noted that natural moisture content and the ground level are subjected to seasonal variation and
the drainage condition of the adjoining areas.
With this site investigation report will give part of the information to enable the designer to
decide and design the foundation system of the proposed project.
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
The interpretation of the results of the investigation and the final decision on the type of foundation
to adopt, rest with the Engineer.
Should there be any questions regarding our work, we should be pleased to discuss them with you.
Prepared by,
GEOLAB (M) SDN. BHD. (Reg. No. 210351-V)

380-380A, Jalan Simbang,
Taman Perling,
81200 Johor Bahru,
Johor Darul Takzim
Tel. No. : 07 236 4932, 07 237 9814
Fax No. : 07 236 4931
Email : geolab@streamyx.com; geolab@tm.net.my; geolab.sisection@yahoo.com.my
Web site : www.geolab-sdn-bhd.com
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
APPENDIX A
Site Plan
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
APPENDIX B
Additional Soil Investigation As-Built Layout
Refinery Process Area
copyright owner.

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
APPENDIX C
Engineering Logs with Borehole Location &

Sample Photographs
copyright owner.

PBH 10-1
Foundation, Soil & Concrete Specialists

GEOLAB (M) SDN BHD (Reg. No : 210351-V) ENGINEERING LOG
Foundation, Soil & Concrete Specialists (Test Method BS5930: 1999)
Project : Additional Soil Investigation Factual Report For RAPID Project - Refinery Process Area Borehole No. : PBH 10-1
Pages 1 of 3
Customer: : Messrs. Technip Geoproduction (M) Sdn Bhd Job No. : GLSB/SI/2566-122(Ref)/2013
Date Started : 14/08/2013 Reduced Level : 1.835 m Coordinate, E : 67000.207 Type of Boring : Rotary Boring
Date Completed : 15/08/2013 Final Depth : 30.11 m N: -73400.016 Boring Diameter : 75mm to 125mm
Depth Sample Standard Penetration Test
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
& Sample Depth Recovery 75 75 75 75 75 75 'N' Remarks
(m) Lithology Ref. (m) Ratio mm mm mm mm mm mm Value
Top Soil - Medium brownish purple, sandy D1 0.00

to
SILT. 0.30
0.835
P1/ 1.00 250/450 1 1 1 2 2 3 8
Firm to stiff, medium brownish purple, slightly D2 to
gravelly slightly sandy CLAY. 1.45
-0.165
P2/ 2.00 200/450 2 3 2 3 3 3 11
Stiff, light purplish brown with medium yellow D3 to
mottled, sandy SILT. 2.45
-1.165
P3/ 3.00 300/450 1 1 1 2 1 2 6
Firm, medium brownish pale grey with medium D4 to
-1.665 purple mottled, SILT. 3.45
UD1 470/700
Medium brownish grey with medium purple 3.50
mottled, slightly sandy SILT. to
4.20
P4/ 4.50 280/450 1 1 1 2 2 2 7

Firm, light brownish pale grey, sandy SILT.
D5 to
4.95
P5/ 6.00 400/450 2 3 3 3 4 5 15

Stiff to very stiff, light brownish grey with pale
D6 to
grey mottled, sandy SILT. 6.45
-5.665
P6/ 7.50 230/450 3 3 4 5 4 5 18
Medium dense, light greyish brown, silty D7 to
slightly gravelly fine to medium SAND. 7.95
-7.165
P7/ 9.00 290/450 2 3 3 3 3 3 12
Stiff, light brownish pale grey, slightly gravelly D8 to
sandy SILT. 9.45
P8/ 10.50 270/450 3 3 3 4 3 4 14

D9 to
10.95
Water Observation Scale of Strength Legend
Date Time Depth Casing W.L Cohesive Soil Non-Cohesive : Wash Boring D : Disturbed Sample
14/08/2013 1720 12.45m 12.00m 2.10m 0-2 Very soft 0-4 Very loose : Split Spoon Sample UD : Undisturbed Sample
15/08/2013 0935 12.45m 12.00m 1.80m 2-4 Soft 4 - 10 Loose : Thin Wall Tube Sample (UD) CL : Cored Length
15/08/2013 1200 30.11m -0.00m 1.40m 4 -8 Firm 10 - 30 Medium dense : Piston Sample (Ps) TCR : Total Cored Recovery
8 - 15 Stiff 30 - 50 Dense : Maizer Sample (M) RQD : Rock Quality Designation
15 - 30 Very stiff > 50 Very dense : Rock Core Sample V : Vane Shear Test
> 30 Hard : Water Level (WL) Pm : Permeability Test
P : Standard Penetration Test Pr : Pressuremeter Test
*
Pages 2 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P9/ 12.00 300/450 2 3 3 3 3 4 13

Stiff, light brownish purple with pale grey
D10 to
spotted, slightly gravelly sandy SILT. 12.45
P10/ 13.50 320/450 1 2 2 3 3 4 12

D11 to
13.95
P11/ 15.00 350/450 2 3 3 4 3 5 15

Stiff to very stiff, light brownish purple with
D12 to
pale grey spotted, sandy SILT. 15.45
P12/ 16.50 320/450 3 4 4 4 5 5 18

Very stiff, light brownish purple with pale grey
D13 to
spotted, sandy SILT. 16.95
P13/ 18.00 300/450 4 5 7 8 8 9 32

Hard, light brownish purple with pale grey
D14 to
P14/ 19.50 320/450 5 7 8 9 11 13 41

D15 to
19.95
P15/ 21.00 260/375 9 11 14 16 20/ 50/

Hard, light brownish purple, slightly gravelly 75mm
D16 to 225mm
sandy SILT. 21.38

0-2 Very soft 0-4 Very loose : Split Spoon Sample UD : Undisturbed Sample
2-4 Soft 4 - 10 Loose : Thin Wall Tube Sample (UD) CL : Cored Length
4 -8 Firm 10 - 30 Medium dense : Piston Sample (Ps) TCR : Total Cored Recovery
*
Pages 3 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
Hard, light brownish purple, slightly gravelly P16/ 22.50 280/330 8 13 16 19 15/ 50/
D17 to 30mm 180mm
sandy SILT. 22.83
P17/ 24.00 100/150 22 28/ 50/

Hard, light brownish purple with pale grey 75mm
D18 to 150mm
spotted, sandy SILT with some gravels. 24.15
P18/ 25.50 70/135 27 23/ 50/

D19 to 60mm 135mm
25.64
P19/ 27.00 90/140 24 26/ 50/

Hard, light brownish purple, sandy SILT with 65mm
D20 to 140mm
some gravels. 27.14
P20/ 28.50 80/125 30 20/ 50/

D21 to 50mm 125mm
28.63
-28.27 P21/ 30.00 100/105 34 16/ 50/

Hard, light brownish purple with pale grey 30mm
D22 to 105mm
spotted, very sandy SILT with some gravels. 30.11
END OF PBH 10-1 AT 30.11 m

*
Project : AdditionalSoilInvestigationFactualReportForRapidProject
RefineryProcessArea
Customer : Messrs.TechnipGeoproduction(M)SdnBhd
Photo1 : DeepBoringLocationatPBH101
Photo2 : DisturbedsampleofPBH101 at1.00m

RefineryProcessArea

RefineryProcessArea

RefineryProcessArea

RefineryProcessArea

RefineryProcessArea

RefineryProcessArea

RefineryProcessArea

PBH 10-2

Pages 1 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P1/ 1.00 340/450 1 0 1 1 1 1 4
Soft to firm, medium to dark grey, slightly
D1 to
gravelly sandy SILT. 1.45
4.536
P2/ 2.00 250/450 1 0 1 0 1 1 3
Soft, yellowish grey, sandy CLAY. D2 to
2.45
P3/ 3.00 200/450 1 2 1 2 2 2 7

Firm, light grey and dark orange, sandy CLAY.
D3 to
3.45
P4/ 4.50 230/450 1 2 2 2 2 2 8

D4 to
4.95
UD1 500/700
Light grey and dark orange, sandy CLAY. 5.00
to
5.70
0.536
P5/ 6.00 270/450 2 2 3 2 3 2 10
Stiff, medium reddish purple with pale grey D5 to
mottled, sandy SILT. 6.45
P6/ 7.50 250/450 3 2 3 2 2 3 10

D6 to
7.95
P7/ 9.00 300/450 2 3 3 4 3 3 13

Stiff, medium reddish purple, slightly gravelly
D7 to
sandy SILT. 9.45
P8/ 10.50 230/450 2 3 3 4 4 3 14

D8 to
10.95

12/08/2013 1440 33.14m 33.00m 1.20m 0-2 Very soft 0-4 Very loose : Split Spoon Sample UD : Undisturbed Sample
*
Pages 2 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P9/ 12.00 280/450 2 2 3 4 5 4 16
Very stiff, medium purple with pale grey
D9 to
spotted, sandy SILT. 12.45
P10/ 13.50 300/450 2 3 2 3 4 5 14

Stiff, medium purple with pale grey spotted,
D10 to
slightly gravelly sandy SILT. 13.95
P11/ 15.00 300/450 3 5 6 5 6 6 23

Very stiff, light to medium purple, sandy SILT.
D11 to
15.45
P12/ 16.50 280/450 4 5 7 7 9 15 38

Hard, light to medium purple, slightly gravelly
D12 to
sandy SILT. 16.95
P13/ 18.00 450/450 7 8 9 8 9 11 37

D13 to
18.45
P14/ 19.50 300/450 5 6 8 8 9 10 35

D14 to
19.95
P15/ 21.00 450/450 5 8 9 9 9 10 37

Hard, light to medium purple with pale grey
D15 to
P16/ 22.50 270/450 4 5 7 8 9 10 34

D16 to
22.95
*
Pages 3 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P17/ 24.00 250/415 4 6 9 13 16 12/ 50/

Hard, light purple with light grey, slightly 40mm 265mm
D17 to
gravelly sandy SILT. 24.42
P18/ 25.50 200/375 6 9 17 18 15/ 50/

D18 to 75mm 225mm
25.88
P19/ 27.00 250/350 5 7 10 17 23/ 50/

Hard, light purple with pale grey spotted, sandy 50mm
D19 to 200mm
SILT. 27.35
P20/ 28.50 220/330 8 10 17 19 14/ 50/

Hard, light purple with pale grey spotted, 30mm
D20 to 180mm
slightly gravelly sandy SILT. 28.83
P21/ 30.00 90/95 31 19/ 50/95mm

D21 to 20mm
30.10
P22/ 31.50 100/115 17 33/ 50/

D22 to 40mm 115mm
31.62
Hard, light purple with pale grey spotted,

slightly gravelly sandy SILT.
-26.599 P23/ 33.00 100/135 28 23/ 50/
D23 to 60mm 135mm
END OF PBH 10-2 AT 33.14 m 33.14

*
RefineryProcessArea
Photo1 : DeepBoringLocationatPBH102

RefineryProcessArea

RefineryProcessArea

RefineryProcessArea

RefineryProcessArea

RefineryProcessArea

RefineryProcessArea

RefineryProcessArea

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
APPENDIX D
Field Vane Shear Test and Calibration Certificate
copyright owner.

GEOLAB (M) SDN. BHD. FIELD VANE SHEAR
Foundation, Soil & Concrete Specialists (Test Method : BS 1377 : Part 9: 1990)
Project : Additional Soil Investigation Factual Report For Rapid Project - Refinery Process Area
Client : Messrs. Technip Geoproduction (M) Sdn Bhd Job No. : GLSB/SI/2566-122(REF)/2013
Equipment Type : Geonor H--10 Equipment Serial No. 1643 Vane Size, D : 65.00mm
BH No : PBH17-3 Depth Tes : 5.00m - 5.50m Coordinate E : 65700.292 R. Level : 4.017

Date : 18/8/2013 Test No. : VS1 N : -76549.924 Chainage :
Natural Test Remoulded Test
20
Degree of
Degree of
Degree of
Degree of
Degree of
Readings
Readings
Readings
Readings
Readings
Rotation
Rotation
Rotation
Rotation
Rotation
Gauge
Gauge
Gauge
Gauge
Gauge
18
2 0.0 102 202 2 0.0 102
4 1.0 104 204 4 1.5 104
6 2.0 106 206 6 3.0 106
8 3.5 108 208 8 4.0 108 16
10 4.0 110 210 10 5.0 110

12 6.0 112 212 12 6.0 112
14 7.0 114 214 14 7.5 114
14
16 8.0 116 216 16 8.0 116
18 9.5 118 218 18 9.0 118
20 10.5 120 220 20 9.0 120
22 11.0 122 222 22 9.0 122 12
24 13.0 124 224 24 9.0 124
Gauge Readings
26 14.0 126 226 26 9.0 126
28 15.0 128 228 28 9.0 128
30 15.0 130 230 30 9.0 130 10
32 16.0 132 232 32 9.0 132
34 17.5 134 234 34 9.0 134
36 18.0 136 236 36 9.0 136
8
38 18.0 138 238 38 138
40 18.0 140 240 40 140
42 18.0 142 242 42 142
44 18.0 144 244 44 144
6
46 18.0 146 246 46 146
48 18.0 148 248 48 148
50 18.0 150 250 50 150
52 18.0 152 252 52 152 4
54 18.0 154 254 54 154
56 156 256 56 156
58 158 258 58 158
60 160 260 60 160 2
62 162 262 62 162

64 164 264 64 164
66 166 266 66 166
0
68 168 268 68 168 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
70 170 270 70 170
72 172 272 72 172 Degree of Rotation
74 174 274 74 174 Natural Test Remoulded Test
76 176 276 76 176
78 178 278 78 178
SHEAR STRENGTH COMPUTATION
80 180 280 80 180
82 182 282 82 182
Shear Strength
84 184 284 84 184
Gauge Reading
86 186 286 86 186
88 188 288 88 188
kN/m2
90 190 290 90 190
Natural 18.0 10.0
92 192 292 92 192
94 194 294 94 194
Remoulded 9.0 5.0
96 196 296 96 196
98 198 298 98 198
Sensitivity 2.0
100 200 300 100 200
GEOLAB (M) SDN. BHD. FIELD VANE SHEAR
Foundation, Soil & Concrete Specialists (Test Method : BS 1377 : Part 9: 1990)
Project : Additional Soil Investigation Factual Report For Rapid Project - Refinery Process Area
Client : Messrs. Technip Geoproduction (M) Sdn Bhd Job No. : GLSB/SI/2566-122(REF)/2013
Equipment Type : Geonor H--10 Equipment Serial No. 1643 Vane Size, D : 65.00mm
BH No : PBH17-3 Depth Tes : 8.00m - 8.50m Coordinate E : 65700.292 R. Level : 4.017

Date : 19/8/2013 Test No. : VS2 N : -76549.924 Chainage :
Natural Test Remoulded Test
35
Degree of
Degree of
Degree of
Degree of
Degree of
Readings
Readings
Readings
Readings
Readings
Rotation
Rotation
Rotation
Rotation
Rotation
Gauge
Gauge
Gauge
Gauge
Gauge
2 1.0 102 202 2 0.0 102
4 2.0 104 204 4 1.0 104 30
6 3.0 106 206 6 2.0 106

8 5.0 108 208 8 3.5 108
10 6.0 110 210 10 4.5 110
12 7.0 112 212 12 5.0 112
14 8.5 114 214 14 6.0 114 25
16 9.0 116 216 16 7.5 116
18 10.0 118 218 18 8.0 118
20 11.0 120 220 20 9.0 120
22 12.0 122 222 22 11.0 122
24 13.5 124 224 24 11.0 124 20
Gauge Readings
26 14.0 126 226 26 11.0 126
28 14.0 128 228 28 11.0 128
30 15.0 130 230 30 11.0 130
32 16.0 132 232 32 11.0 132
34 17.0 134 234 34 11.0 134
15
36 18.0 136 236 36 11.0 136
38 19.0 138 238 38 11.0 138
40 19.0 140 240 40 11.0 140
42 19.5 142 242 42 11.0 142
44 20.0 144 244 44 144
10
46 20.5 146 246 46 146
48 21.0 148 248 48 148
50 22.0 150 250 50 150
52 23.0 152 252 52 152
54 24.0 154 254 54 154
56 25.0 156 256 56 156 5
58 26.5 158 258 58 158
60 27.0 160 260 60 160
62 28.0 162 262 62 162
64 29.0 164 264 64 164
66 29.0 166 266 66 166 0
68 29.0 168 268 68 168 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
70 29.0 170 270 70 170

72 29.0 172 272 72 172 Degree of Rotation
74 29.0 174 274 74 174 Natural Test Remoulded Test
76 29.0 176 276 76 176
78 29.0 178 278 78 178
SHEAR STRENGTH COMPUTATION
80 29.0 180 280 80 180
82 29.0 182 282 82 182
Shear Strength
84 184 284 84 184
Gauge Reading
86 186 286 86 186
88 188 288 88 188
kN/m2
90 190 290 90 190
Natural 29.0 16.0
92 192 292 92 192
94 194 294 94 194
Remoulded 11.0 6.0
96 196 296 96 196
98 198 298 98 198
Sensitivity 2.7
100 200 300 100 200
RefineryProcessArea
Photo1 : FieldVaneShearTestatPBH173atdepth5.00m
Photo2 : FieldVaneShearTestatPBH173atdepth8.00m
OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
APPENDIX E
Trial Pits
copyright owner.

Top
Reddishbrownwithpalegreymottled,lightpurpleandlightyellowspotted, slightly gravelly slightly

sandySILT.
EndofNTP12at2.50m
FaceA FaceB FaceC
TrialPitNo.
:NTP12
Project:AdditionalSoilInvestigationWorksForRapidProjectRefineryProcessArea.
GEOLAB (M) SDN BHD (210351-V)
Coordinate,E1836.6966
:
Foundation,Soil&ConcreteSpecialists
Client:Messrs.TechnipGeoproduction(M)SdnBhd Date:07thOctober2013 N4957.5089
:
Top
Mediumtodarkbrownwithpalegreystreaked,darkbrownanddarkgreyspotted,slightly gravellysandySILTwithalotofrootlet.
Yellowishbrownwithreddishbrownmottled,sandySILTwithatracesofrootlets.
EndofNTP13at3.00m
FaceA FaceB FaceC
TrialPitNo.
:NTP13
Project:AdditionalSoilInvestigationWorksForRapidProjectRefineryProcessArea.
GEOLAB (M) SDN BHD (210351-V)
Coordinate,E1425.0711
:
Foundation,Soil&ConcreteSpecialists
Client:Messrs.TechnipGeoproduction(M)SdnBhd Date:07thOctober2013 N5802.8530
:
OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
APPENDIX F
Cone Penetration Test
copyright owner.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 SCOPES OF WORK
3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE CONE PENETRATION TEST
3.1 EQUIPMENT
3.2 METHOD OF TEST
4.0 SUMMARY
4.1 SUMMARY OF CONE PENETRATION TEST
4.2 SUMMARY OF DISSIPATION TEST
5.0 REMARKS
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A : DETAILS OF 20 TON PUSH CAPACITY PENETROMETER RIG

APPENDIX B : CONE & DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS
APPENDIX C : CONE CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES
APPENDIX D : CONE PENETRATION TEST RESULTS (GRAPHS)
APPENDIX E : DISSIPATION TEST RESULTS (GRAPHS)
GLSB/CPT/17-134/2013 (02)
CONE PENETRATION TESTS REPORT

FOR
ADDITIONAL SOIL INVESTIGATION FACTUAL REPORT
FOR RAPID PROJECT - REFINERY PROCESS AREA
OWNER: MESSRS. PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS)

CLIENT: MESSRS. TECHNIP GEOPRODUCTION (M) SDN BHD
1. INTRODUCTION
Following an drawings and specification from MESSRS. TECHNIP
GEOPRODUCTION (M) SDN BHD, Soil Investigation Work which comprised 4 numbers of
Cone Penetration Tests & 3 numbers of Dissipation Test was carried out by Geolab (M) Sdn.
Bhd.
This report represents the results of 4 numbers of Cone Penetration Tests & 3 numbers
of Dissipation Tests results for the above mentioned project site. Please refer to item 4.1 for
Summary of Cone Penetration Tests & item 4.2 for Summary of Dissipation Tests.
The field work was carried out in accordance with the drawing and specification given by
the personnel of Client/Consultant. The site investigation works was carried out in accordance
with the British Standard Code of Practice BS 1377 : Part 9 : 1990 and the International
Reference Test Procedure for Cone Penetration Test (CPT).
Field testing program was conducted during the period of 23-08-2013 to 26-08-2013.
This program was supervised by our personnel from our office who was responsible for Cone
Penetration Test.
2. SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work involved in this investigation includes the following: -
2.1 To carry out 4 numbers of Cone Penetration Tests and 3 numbers of Dissipation Tests
for Clients Engineer/Designer to determine/inetpret the Engineering Parameters of
the existing soil strata.
Page - 2
GLSB/CPT/17-134/2013 (02)
3. DESCRIPTION OF THE CONE PENETRATION TEST

3.1 EQUIPMENT
The equipment used for the piezocone test follows the British Standard Code of
Practice BS 1377 : Part 9 : 1990 and the International Reference Test Procedure for the
Cone Penetration Test (CPT).
The cone has transducers to measure cone resistance, local friction, water pressure
and biaxial inclination. Cones are calibrated by manufacturer. A filter element
(Polypropylene) with diameter 36mm one size located in the cylindrical extension above
the base of the cone allows the pore water pressure generated during the penetration to be
measured by means of a pressure transducer located in the piezometer tip (u2 type cone).
In order to ensure that pore pressure measurements are not affected by the presence of air
in the measuring transducer, a de-airing procedure is carried out as required. The filters
are saturated by de-aired silicon or glycerin. A new filter is used for each sounding
location. Please note that following the initial de-airing procedure, it will only be repeated
if the cone is removed from the water into air, or at the beginning of each working day,
whichever is first.
The data acquisition system is Geomils GME 500 acquisition system. Signals from
the cone are transmitted to the GME 500 system via a cable threaded through the
sounding tubes. Depth registration is provided by an event marker activated via the action
of the hydraulic rams. The equipment provides:
a. A continuous listing (10 mm interval) of all measured parameters (cone resistance,
local friction, pore water pressure and inclination) recorded inside computer
memory.
b. Graphical presentation of measured parameters at any scale required.
c. Resolution of the measured parameter is:-
Cone resistance : 0.01 Mpa
Local friction : 0.1 kPa
Pore water pressure : 1 kPa
Inclination : 0.1 degrees
The jacking unit is a 200 KN twin cylinder hydraulic ram with 220 KN upward
forces. The jacks, data acquisition and all accessories are mounted on a self-propelled
crawler chassis. The total weight of the unit is approximately 6ton, additional reaction can
be provided by screw anchors installed using a hydraulic turning device.
Page - 3
GLSB/CPT/17-134/2013 (02)
3.2 METHOD OF TEST

The method of carrying out the penetration test follows the British Standard Code of
Practice BS 1377 : Part 9 : 1990 and the International Reference Test Procedure for the
Cone Penetration Test (CPT) as follows:-
a. The crawler is set up with the jacks vertical.
b. The cone is connected to the GME 500 data acquisition and the whole system allowed
warming up for approximately 10 minutes during which time the cone is placed in a
water bath at constant temperature.
c. Once warming up is completed and readings are steady, baseline (zero load value) is
recorded and penetration started.
d. The piezocone is advanced into the ground at a rate of 20 mm/s while the measured
parameters are recorded every 10 mm.
Dissipation Test
a. Dissipation test will be carried out at Consultant or Client Representatives specified
depth.
b. Dissipation test will be carried out by stopping penetration at specified depth and
record the in-situ pore pressure and time taken (This recording will be automatically
carried out by the GME 500 data acquisition systems program). During the
dissipation test process the rods will be clamped.
c. When the pore pressure dissipation reach more than 50% on as specified by the
consultant/client representative the dissipation test will be terminated by continuing
penetration (Continuing CPT).
The test is terminated either at the limit of the equipment or at a specified

depth, after which the cone is pulled out of the ground and a final baseline recorded.
Page - 4
GLSB/CPT/17-134/2013 (02)
The following criteria will be adopted to define termination of each CPT:

1) Reaching a specified depth specified by the Employer, or
2) Reaching the maximum thrust capacity of the system, or
3) Reaching a cone resistance of 20 Mpa, or
4) The cone reaching a maximum deviation of 10 degrees and/or an increase in deviation of
over 3 degrees per meter, or
5) If the ground no longer withstand the trust applied, or
6) Buckling of the sounding rods is imminent, or
7) At the discretion of the CPT operator if it is in his opinion, it is unsafe to continue either in
terms of safety of personnel or potential loss/damage to the equipment whichever come first.
The following criteria will be adopted to define termination of each DSSP:

1) Reaching a specified time specified percent dissipation by the Employer, or
2) Reaching or over the 55% normalized pore water pressure dissipation, or
3) Reaching overnight, or
4) If the rods are slipping down, or
5) At the discretion of the CPT operator if it is in his opinion, it is unsafe to continue either in
terms of safety of personnel or potential loss/damage to the equipment whichever come first.
Page - 5
4.0 Summary
4.1 Summary of Cone Penetration Test
ADDITIONAL SOIL INVESTIGATION FACTUAL REPORT FOR RAPID PROJECT - REFINERY PROCESS AREA
MESSRS: PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS)
MESSRS: TECHNIP GEOPRODUCTION (M) SDN BHD

GEOLAB
Job Number : GLSB/CPT/17-134/13 (02)
CPT Date (Start / Location Ground Total 0m to 20m to Terminat

No. Test No. Cone ID Remarks
Rig/Operator Complete) Level (mRL) Depth 20m 40m ion*
Northing Easting
2. Refinery (Area 1000) & SSU (Area 1700)

1 PCPT 10-1 10ton Rig/Hafifi 2013-8-25 -73499.944 66900.128 3.168 10.43 10.43 - C10CFIIP.G68 2, 6 & 7
33.78 m 33.78 m 0.00 m
* Termanation criteria for CPT

1) Reaching a specified depth specified by the Employer, or
2) Reaching the maximum thrust capacity of the system, or
3) Reaching a cone resistance of 20 Mpa, or
4) The cone reaching a maximum deviation of 10 degrees and/or an increase in deviation of over 3 degrees per meter, or
5) If the ground no longer withstand the trust applied, or
6) Buckling of the sounding rods is imminent, or
7) At the discretion of the CPT operator if it is in his opinion, it is unsafe to continue either in terms of safety of personnel or
potential loss/damage to the equipment.
Summary CPT Page 1 of 2

4.2 Summary of Dissipation Test
ADDITIONAL SOIL INVESTIGATION FACTUAL REPORT FOR RAPID PROJECT - REFINERY PROCESS AREA
MESSRS: PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS)
MESSRS: TECHNIP GEOPRODUCTION (M) SDN BHD

GEOLAB
Job Number : GLSB/CPT/17-134/13 (02)
Water Depth
Reference Date (Start / Tested Total Time Time for
No. Test No. at Start Time Cone ID Termination* Remarks
CPT Complete) Depth (m) (Min) U50 (Min)
(m) [BGL]
2. Refinery (Area 1000) & SSU (Area 1700)

1 PCPT 10-1_D6.5m PCPT 10-1 25-8-2013 6.50 1.20 60.50 37.99 C10CFIIP.G68 2
2 PCPT-10-2_D7.5m PCPT-10-2 24-8-2013 7.50 1.20 30.00 1.82 C10CFIIP.G68 2
3 PCPT 60-1_D5.5m PCPT 60-1 26-8-2013 5.50 1.30 30.00 1.63 C10CFIIP.G68 2
2.01 hr
* Termanation criteria for DSSP

1) Reaching a specified time by the Employer, or
2) Reaching or over the 50% normalized pore water pressure dissipation, or
3) Reaching overnight, or
4) If the rods are slipping down, or
5) At the discretion of the CPT operator if it is in his opinion, it is unsafe to continue either in terms of safety of personnel or
potential loss/damage to the equipment.
Summary DSPT Page 2 of 2

GLSB/CPT/17-134/2013 (02)
5.0 REMARKS
Total 4 numbers of Cone Penetration Tests and 3 numbers of Dissipation Tests were
successfully completed at the Project of for ADDITIONAL SOIL INVESTIGATION
FACTUAL REPORT FOR RAPID PROJECT - REFINERY PROCESS AREA on 26-08-
13. The tests results are presented in Appendix D & E.
Shall there be any queries about our works and our test results, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Geolab (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Page - 6
APPENDIX A
Details Of 20 Ton Push Capacity

Penetrometer Rig

HOGENT OGLER & CO., INC.
HOGENTOGLER 1-410-381-2390
Crawlers: Medium Weight
The 20 ton medium weight, track mounted Specifications:

penetrometer system is a self propelled, hydraulic, Push Capacity 20 Tons
remote controlled CPT system designed for rough Pull Capacity 26 Tons
terrain or areas where low ground pressure is Power 29 Hp diesel
required for access. The CPT is mounted on tracks Length 117"
serviceable throughout the world. It has two Width 63"
double acting hydraulic cylinders coupled by a Weight 12,200 Pounds
platen that pushes and pulls electronic cones and (depending on tools)
other tools. It is powered by a 29 Hp diesel engine Top Speed 2 Miles Per Hour
with an electric starter. An hydraulically powered Operation Hydraulic Remote Control
anchoring system can quickly screw anchors into (Walk behind)
the ground to achieve 20 tons of reaction weight.
The unit is equipped with mechanical leveling. Track Weight Capacity 15,000 Pounds
Optional hydraulic leveling jacks are available.
Cones, rods, and other accessories are furnished Ground Pressure 4.5 Pounds Per Square Inch
separately. (Based on 12,200 Pound Weight)
Options:
Tilt back rams
Hydraulic leveling
Cone penetrometers, samplers, ect.
8 WWW.HOGENT
WWW.HOGENT
.HOGENTOGLER.COM
OGLER.COM
APPENDIX B
Cone Specifications

APPENDIX C
Cone Calibration Certificates

APPENDIX D

(Graphs)

GEOLAB (M) SDN BHD (Reg NO. 210351-V)
RESULTS OF CONE PENETRATION TEST
Project : ADDITIONAL SOIL INVESTIGATION FACTUAL REPORT FOR RAPID PROJECT - REFINERY PROCESS AREA
Owner : MESSRS PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS) Job No. GLSB/CPT/17-134/13 (02)
Client : MESSRS TECHNIP GEOPRODUCTION (M) SDN BHD W.O No.
CPT No. : PCPT 10-1 Location & Coordinate

: Ground Level : 3.168 mRL
Data File : PCPT 10-1 .GEF Location : REFINERY (AREA 1000) & SSU (AREA 1700) Water Level : 1.20 m (Below Ground Level)
Tested Date : 2013-8-25 North : -73499.944 Terminated Depth : 10.43 m (Below Ground Level)
ConeID : C10CFIIP.G68 East : 66900.128 Terminated Elevation : -7.26 mRL
Cone Resistance, qc (MPa) Sleeve Friction, fs (kPa) Pore Water Pressure, u2 (kPa) Friction Ratio, Rf (%)
0 4 8 12 16 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 150 300 450 600 750 0 2 4 6 8 10
0 0 0 0
U2 Uo
4 4 4 4
Depth (m)
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20
PCPT 10-1 - Page - 1 of 1


0 4 8 12 16 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 150 300 450 600 750 0 2 4 6 8 10
0 0 0 0
U2 Uo
4 4 4 4
Depth (m)
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20


Data File : PCPT 10-3.GEF Location : REFINERY (AREA 1000) & SSU (AREA 1700) Water Level : 4.00 m (Below Ground Level)
ConeID : C10CFIIP.G68 East : 67000.172 Terminated Elevation : 0.14 mRL
0 4 8 12 16 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 150 300 450 600 750 0 2 4 6 8 10
0 0 0 0
U2 Uo
4 4 4 4
Depth (m)
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20


0 4 8 12 16 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 150 300 450 600 750 0 2 4 6 8 10
0 0 0 0
U2 Uo
4 4 4 4
Depth (m)
8 8 8 8
12 12 12 12
16 16 16 16
20 20 20 20

APPENDIX E
Dissipation Test Results

(Graphs)

RESULTS OF DISSIPATION TEST
Owner : MESSRS PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS) Job No. : GLSB/CPT/17-134/13 (02)
Client : MESSRS TECHNIP GEOPRODUCTION (M) SDN BHD W.O No. : Duration : 60.50 min
CPT No. : PCPT 10-1 Test Date : 25-8-2013 Water Depth at Start Time : 1.200 m(B.G.L) T50 : 37.992 min
Test Depth : 6.50 m (B.G.L) Cone ID : C10CFIIP.G68 Equilibrium Pore Water Pressure : 0.053 MPa U50 : 0.213 MPa
Max
Min
T50 = 37.99 Min
Interval
100 0.372
T0 Line T50 Line
Pore Water Pressure (MPa)

90
80 0.308
Normalized Excess Pore Water Pressure, U (%)
70
60 0.245
50 0.213 MPa
40 0.181
30
20 0.117
10
0 0.053
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 1000.00 10000.00
Time, t (min)
Note : m(B.G.L) = metre Below Ground Level

CPT No. : PCPT-10-2 Test Date : 24-8-2013 Water Depth at Start Time : 1.200 m(B.G.L) T50 : 1.823 min
Max
Min
T50 = 1.82 Min
Interval
100 0.321
T0 Line T50 Line

90
80 0.270
70
60 0.218
50 0.192 MPa
40 0.166
30
20 0.115
10
0 0.063
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 1000.00 10000.00
Time, t (min)

CPT No. : PCPT 60-1 Test Date : 26-8-2013 Water Depth at Start Time : 1.300 m(B.G.L) T50 : 1.625 min
Max
Min
T50 = 1.63 Min
Interval
100 0.437
T0 Line T50 Line

90
80 0.358
70
60 0.279
50 0.239 MPa
40 0.200
30
20 0.121
10
0 0.042
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 1000.00 10000.00
Time, t (min)

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
APPENDIX G
Earth Resistivity Test
copyright owner.

GEOLAB (M) SDN BHD (REG NO.210351-V)
Foundation, Soil & Concrete Specialists.
380-380A, Jalan Simbang, Taman Perling, 81200 Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
Tel07-2364932, 2379814
Fax 07-2364931
Emailadmin@geolab-sdn-bhd.com, info@geolab-sdn-bhd.com
Website www.geolab-sdn-bhd.com
FIELD MEASURED RESISTIVITY TEST DATA (WENNER METHOD)
Project PETRONAS RAPID PROJECT, FEED PHASE
Client MESSRS PETRONAS Location AREA-1000

Equipment MESSRS TECHNIP Point No ERT-9
Operator Sting R1 Azimuth Nil
Weather Clear Date 07-10-13
Electrod Resistance Current I Voltage, V Apparent Remarks

Spacing a (m) () (mA) (mV) Resistivity (m)
1.0 144.600 20 2892.0 908.549

2.0 76.900 20 1538.0 966.354
3.0 54.140 50 2707.0 1020.515
4.0 39.770 50 1988.5 999.529
5.0 31.060 50 1553.0 975.779
7.0 21.640 50 1082.0 951.777
9.0 15.730 50 786.5 889.511
12.0 11.030 50 551.5 831.642
15.0 8.897 50 444.9 838.522
20.0 6.679 50 334.0 839.308
25.0 5.550 50 277.5 871.792
30.0 4.854 50 242.7 914.957
Measured Apparent Resiitivity Vs Spacing

10000
1000
m)
Aparwnt Resistivity (
100
10
0
0 1 "
" Spacing (m) 10 100
Project: PETRONAS RAPID PROJECT, FEED PHASE
Geolab
Point: ERT-9 Method: Wenner Date : 07-10-13
Electrod Modified Measured Modified Measured Modeled Layer Soil Model Depth
Layer
Spacing (m) Resistance (
) Resistivity (
m) Resistivity (
m) Thickness (m) (m)
0.001 872.67 0.100000001
1 144.600 908.55 1 872.67 0.77 0.77
2 76.900 966.35 2 944.75 0.75 1.52
3 54.140 1020.51 3 1224.05 1.53 3.05
4 39.140 983.70 4 992.64 2.89 5.94
5 31.060 975.78 5 556.06 6.27 12.21
7 21.640 951.78 6 1093.93 17.79 30.00
9 15.730 889.51
12 11.030 831.64
15 8.897 838.52
20 6.679 839.31
25 5.550 871.79
30 4.854 914.96
Measured Resiitivity & Modeled Resistivity Vs Spacing

10000
m)
1000
100
0 1 10 100
"
" Spacing (m)
Point No. ERT-9 Date 07-10-13 Geolab

Tel07-2364932, 2379814
Fax 07-2364931


1.0 55.970 20 1119.4 351.670

2.0 30.810 20 616.2 387.170
3.0 18.700 50 935.0 352.487
4.0 15.140 50 757.0 380.510
5.0 13.860 50 693.0 435.425
7.0 10.000 50 500.0 439.823
9.0 7.616 20 152.3 430.675
12.0 5.829 50 291.5 439.496
15.0 4.687 20 93.7 441.739
20.0 3.797 20 75.9 477.145
25.0 3.360 50 168.0 527.788
30.0 2.815 20 56.3 530.615

1000
100
m)
10
0
0 1 "
Geolab
Layer
) Resistivity (
m) Resistivity (
0.001 354.28 0.100000001
1 55.970 351.67 1 354.28 0.64 0.64
2 28.352 356.29 2 349.60 0.65 1.29
3 20.017 377.31 3 299.68 1.26 2.55
4 15.652 393.38 4 676.93 2.91 5.45
5 13.192 414.43 5 271.88 6.85 12.31
7 9.722 427.60 6 789.00 17.69 30.00
9 7.616 430.67
12 5.761 434.34
15 4.687 441.74
20 3.797 477.15
25 3.267 513.19
30 2.815 530.61

1000
m)
100
0 1 10 100
"
" Spacing (m)

Tel07-2364932, 2379814
Fax 07-2364931


1.0 52.150 50 2607.5 327.668

2.0 23.600 50 1180.0 296.566
3.0 15.140 50 757.0 285.382
4.0 12.240 50 612.0 307.625
5.0 10.240 50 512.0 321.699
7.0 8.114 50 405.7 356.872
9.0 6.759 50 338.0 382.212
12.0 5.782 20 115.6 435.953
15.0 5.241 20 104.8 493.953
20.0 3.214 50 160.7 403.883
25.0 3.981 50 199.1 625.334
30.0 3.341 50 167.1 629.764

1000
100
m)
10
0
0 1 "
Geolab
Layer
) Resistivity (
m) Resistivity (
0.001 363.99 0.100000001
1 52.150 327.67 1 363.99 0.70 0.70
2 23.871 299.98 2 267.85 0.69 1.39
3 15.749 296.87 3 260.21 1.35 2.74
4 12.240 307.62 4 341.30 2.74 5.47
5 10.379 326.07 5 440.24 5.49 10.96
7 8.114 356.87 6 907.55 19.04 30.00
9 6.759 382.21
12 5.701 429.84
15 5.115 482.07
20 4.325 543.48
25 3.761 590.75
30 3.341 629.76

1000
m)
100
0 1 10 100
"
" Spacing (m)

Tel07-2364932, 2379814
Fax 07-2364931


1.0 50.150 50 2507.5 315.102

2.0 24.600 20 492.0 309.133
3.0 16.130 50 806.5 304.043
4.0 12.730 50 636.5 319.940
5.0 10.370 50 518.5 325.783
7.0 8.122 50 406.1 357.224
9.0 6.759 50 338.0 382.212
12.0 5.726 50 286.3 431.730
15.0 5.273 50 263.7 496.969
20.0 3.245 20 64.9 407.779
25.0 3.979 50 199.0 625.020
30.0 3.390 50 169.5 639.000

1000
100
m)
10
0
0 1 "
Geolab
Layer
) Resistivity (
m) Resistivity (
0.001 328.44 0.100000001
1 50.150 315.10 1 328.44 0.70 0.70
2 24.122 303.12 2 290.58 0.70 1.40
3 16.130 304.04 3 285.14 1.39 2.78
4 12.444 312.75 4 302.25 2.72 5.50
5 10.373 325.88 5 464.97 5.09 10.59
7 8.122 357.22 6 927.69 19.41 30.00
9 6.759 382.21
12 5.726 431.73
15 5.169 487.12
20 4.393 552.04
25 3.880 609.52
30 3.390 639.00

1000
m)
100
0 1 10 100
"
" Spacing (m)

Tel07-2364932, 2379814
Fax 07-2364931


1.0 144.600 5 723.0 908.549

2.0 76.900 5 384.5 966.354
3.0 54.140 5 270.7 1020.515
4.0 39.770 5 198.9 999.529
5.0 31.060 5 155.3 975.779
7.0 21.640 10 216.4 951.777
9.0 15.730 10 157.3 889.511
12.0 11.030 5 55.2 831.642
15.0 8.897 10 89.0 838.522
20.0 6.679 10 66.8 839.308
25.0 5.550 10 55.5 871.792
30.0 4.854 5 24.3 914.957

10000
1000
m)
100
10
0
0 1 "
Geolab
Layer
) Resistivity (
m) Resistivity (
0.001 874.64 0.100000001
1 144.600 908.55 1 874.64 0.78 0.78
2 76.900 966.35 2 930.53 0.75 1.52
3 54.140 1020.51 3 1267.10 1.53 3.05
4 39.770 999.53 4 982.71 2.84 5.89
5 31.060 975.78 5 553.25 6.24 12.12
7 21.640 951.78 6 1094.65 17.88 30.00
9 15.730 889.51
12 11.030 831.64
15 8.897 838.52
20 6.679 839.31
25 5.550 871.79
30 4.854 914.96

10000
m)
1000
100
0 1 10 100
"
" Spacing (m)

OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
APPENDIX H
Thermal Conductivity / Thermal Resistivity Results
copyright owner.

SOIL THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY TEST & THERMAL RESISTIVITY TEST DATA
Project : PETRONAS RAPID PROJECT, FEED PHASE (AREA 3000-3)

Client : MESSRS PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS)
Consultant : MESSRS TECHNIP GEOPRODUCTION (M) SDN BHD
Main Contractor :
Test Location : AREA 1000 & 1700

Test No : TCT-14,15,16,17,18,19 & 20
Coordinate :
Elevation :
Soil Type :
Weather :
K (Thermal R (Thermal
Soil Type / Depth Conductivity) Resistivity) Temp.
Test Number Date / Time
Weather (m) -1 -1 -1 (Deg C)
(Wm C ) (mCW )
Slightly Sandy a) Surface 0.76 1.31 30.7
16-09-13
SILT b) Surface 1.25 0.80 30.4
TCT-14
c) Surface 0.63 1.59 31.2
14:30 Sunny
Average 0.88 1.23 30.8
a) Surface 0.53 1.69 31.9
19-09-13 Dry Soil
b) Surface 0.17 5.95 31.6
TCT-15
c) Surface 1.12 0.90 31.6
17:00 Sunny
Average 0.61 2.85 31.7
16-09-13
TCT-16
c) Surface 1.02 0.98 31.2
14:20 Sunny
Average 1.07 0.94 30.7
a) Surface 1.36 0.74 34.5
20-09-13 Dry, SILT
b) Surface 1.15 0.87 35.8
TCT-17
c) Surface 0.68 0.02 35.1
11:30 Sunny
Average 1.06 0.54 35.1
a) Surface 2.07 0.48 32.2
22-09-13 Dry, SILT
b) Surface 1.48 0.67 31.0
TCT-18
c) Surface 1.53 0.65 30.9
16:20 Sunny
Average 1.69 0.60 31.4
16-09-13
TCT-19
c) Surface 1.02 0.98 30.5
14:10 Sunny
Average 1.08 0.94 31.0
16-09-13
TCT-20
c) Surface 0.98 1.02 35.1
14:00 Sunny
Average 1.34 0.78 34.0
OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
APPENDIX I
Downhole PS Logging Results
copyright owner.

ITEM CONTENTS PAGES
1. OUTLINE OF THE PROJECT

1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Particulars of the Project 1
2. SCOPE OF WORK FOR DOWNHOLE PS LOGGING

2.1 Downhole PS-Logging 2
2.2 Seismograph Equipment 3
2.3 Borehole Pick 3315 for PS-Logging 5
3. RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION
3.1 Results of Downhole PS Logging 6
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. 1 Schematic Diagram of Downhole Test

Fig. 2 Oyo McSeis SX-XP 24 Channels Seismograph
Fig. 3 BHP 3315 (Borehole Pick)
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Quantity of Works- PS-Logging Survey

Table 2 Specification of McSeis-SX XP
APPENDIX
Appendix A Downhole PS Logging Result

Appendix B Site Photographs
1. OUTLINE OF THE PROJECT
1.1 Introduction
The purpose of this geophysical investigation is to obtain the geophysical properties of the
soil at sites. Geophysical tests were performed to obtain the P-wave and S-wave velocities of
the soil strata. These results provide the designer with the information pertinent to the seismic
wave velocities of the materials. This data may be used as input into static/dynamic analysis,
as means for computing Shear modulus, Youngs modulus and Poissons Ratio.
1.2 Particulars of the Project

a) Name of Project : Downhole PS Logging-Rapid Project For Additional SI
Works at Pengerang, Johor (AREA 1000 & 1700).
b) Location : Pengerang, Johor
c) Client : Messrs. Technip Geoproduction (M) Sdn.Bhd
d) Period of Work : 20th -23th October 2013 (Fieldwork)

4th 11th November 2013 (Data Analysis and Reporting)
e) Scope of Work : Downhole PS-Logging Survey
(Quantity of works are shown in Table 1)
Table 1 Quantity of Works Downhole PS-Logging Survey
No. Borehole Location Logging Depth (m)
1. PBH 10-10 28.00

TOTAL 28.00
1
2. SCOPE OF WORK FOR DOWNHOLE PS LOGGING
2.1 DOWNHOLE PS LOGGING

The method requires one borehole per test location. The borehole is PVC-cased and grouted
to ensure the hole remains open and that the casing is in firm contact with the soil or rock
mass. The test consists of lowering a geophone to a specified depth in the borehole and
clamping it to the casing. An energy source is placed at the surface, near the top of casing.
Generally, the source is a sledgehammer which is struck vertically onto a steel plate on the
ground placed near to the borehole (ie, Compressional or P wave source) or, alternatively,
horizontally by striking the both ends of the wooden block (ie, shear or S wave source). The
wooden block is firmly sitting on the ground. The source is struck for P wave transmission as
well as for S wave transmission, and travel time from the moment of source initiation until
reception at the geophone is recorded. The geophone is next moved to a new depth and the
process is repeated.
For Downhole PS-Logging test, the wave propagates downward. Hence P-wave is monitored
by the vertical sensors while S-wave is generated through hitting the two ends of the wooden
block. This causes two waves of which one is the reverse of the other. Interval velocity
(instantaneous velocity over an interval) is determined by comparing successive readings.
This procedure is repeated at a specified depth interval from the bottom of the hole to the top.
Fig. 1 Schematic Diagram of Downhole Test
2
2.2 Seismograph Equipment
The system used for this project was a 24-Channel seismograph manufactured by Oyo
Corporation, Japan, Model McSeis SX-XP. The particulars of this instrument are listed in
Table 2.
Fig. 2 Oyo McSeis- SX XP 24 Channels Seismograph
3
Table 2 Specification of McSeis - SX XP
McSeis - SX XP
Data Acquisition
Number of Channels 1,3,6,12 or 24 + 1 AUX
Input Impedance Differential 20 k/0.05 F
Gain 24, 36, 48, 60 dB
Frequency Band 2 - 4600 Hz
A/D Resolution 24 bits
Setting feasible to 33.3, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000sec
Sample rate
Setting feasible to 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384 words
Pre-Trigger 0 (OFF), 128 (ON)
Data Length 0, 128 samples
Trigger Level 100-1000 mV (100mV step), Setting to OFF feasible
System
CPU ULV Intel Celeron Processor 400MHz
Display 640 x 480 dots 10.4 inch LCD VGA
Hard Disk 80GB
Memory 256MB
OS Windows XP SP2 Professional
LCD 1024 x 768 dots 10.4-inch Color
Display
Size XGA : TFT
USB (for external printer, memory, mouse, other USB drive)
Interface
External keyboard I/F (for device maintenance)
Dc 12V (10.5 ~ 14.0V)
Operating Power Supply
2.5 A (standby), 3.0 A (acquisition)
Dimensions 330 (W) x 280 (D) x 220 (H) mm
Weight 8kg
Sample rate Digital Low-Pass Filter

(sec) (Hz)
25 (4600) * 1
50 (4600) * 1
Anti-aliasing filter
100 1000
200 500
500 200
1000 100
2000 100
Real time Noise monitor

Digital Filtering
Others
Channel Switch function
Digital Data Stacking
4
2.3 Borehole Pick 3315 for PS-Logging
The Model BHP-3315 Borehole Pick is what we call the Borehole Geophone used for PS
logging to measure P-Wave and S-Wave velocities of the ground. This instrument is
constituted by the 3-component geophone, the unit to affect the pressurized contact of the
system to the borehole wall, and the cable with additional installation of the water supply
tube. In the geophone unit, the geophone of moving coil type is being built, constituted by
one component vertical and two components horizontal. The effective unit to the pressurized
contact of the system to the borehole wall is adapting the method of pressurizing, inflating,
and expanding the external rubber tube in the geophone for its pressurized contact to the
borehole wall. Furthermore, the cable with additional installation of the water supply tube is
used for transferring the signal from the geophone, and for supplying the water that serves to
give pressure to and inflate the rubber tube. Having the features effective for PS logging,
being handy dimensionally, and easily accessible to its operation.
Fig. 3 BHP 3315 (Borehole Pick)

Features:
Being designed small in size and light in weight, the Instruments can applied for the
borehole of comparatively small diameter (56mm)
Adopting the unit to affect the pressurized contact of the system to the borehole wall
by the rubber tube, the instrument can be fixed at the optional depth in the borehole.
Being unitized with the cable, the water supply tube for inflating the rubber tube
eliminates the complexity with jobs in the site, and enables inserting into the
borehole, and drawing out from it this Instrument.
With the depth scale marked on it, the cable offers easy access to verify the measuring
depth.
5
3. RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION
3.1 Results of Downhole PS Logging
a) P-Wave
In case of down-hole method, wave propagates downward. Therefore, P-Wave is monitored
by the vertical sensor. The distance between wave sources and sensor is calculated based on
horizontal distance of wave sources from the mouth of the borehole and depth of sensor is
calculated by the following formula:
l= X 2 + d2
Here, X is the distance from the source to the mouth of the borehole, d is the depth of the
sensor.
Corrected first arrival time is given by:

d
t= T
l
Here, T is the first arrival time at depth d.
Time-Distance curve is plotted which shows the relationship between t and d. This curve is
divided into several appropriate regions of straight lines. P-Wave velocity was obtained from
l
these lines as
t
b) S-Wave
S-Wave is created through hitting the two ends of the timber. This causes two waves of
which one is the reverse of the other. The two waves are detected and monitored from the
horizontal sensor of the borehole pick. The waveforms are superimposed with each other and
the more obvious reversed waveform, from any of the two horizontal sensors, is used for
analysis for each depth. And processing all the superimposed waveforms with depth, it can be
observed that the occurrence of these waves is delayed with increasing depth. The time
difference between the peak with the highest magnitude and the first break time is monitored
at the shallowest depth. Hence, this lapse in time is taken as constant for all depth. Thus, a
Time-Distance curve is plotted and the velocity of S-Wave is obtained in the same manner as
P-Wave.
6
c) Analysis Result of PS-Logging
The records obtained at each depth are traced up in order of depth. Results are further used
for analysis of soil geological and physical properties.
Elastic coefficient of the soil/rock can be calculated from compression and shear wave
velocities by using the following equations:
Vs 2
Rigidity factor G=
g
Youngs Modulus E = 2 (1 + ) G
V
[( P )2 2]
VS
Poissons Ratio =
V
2 [( P )2 1]
VS
Where
Vp : Compression wave velocity, m/sec
Vs : Shear wave velocity, m/sec
: Density, g/cm3
g : Acceleration due to gravity, 9.8m/s2
7
APPENDIX A
Time (msec)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Depth (m)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
P Wave Form-BH PBH 10-10

Time (msec)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Depth (m)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S Wave Form PBH 10-10

Velocity (m/s)
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Depth (m)
P Wave
Velocity
15
16 S Wave
Velocity
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
S Wave & P Wave Traveltime PBH10-10

Downhole PS Logging Result PBH10-10
P wave S Wave Input Parameters Derived Dynamic Parameters SPT RQD Geological
Depth Velocity Velocity g Rigidity Modulus, G Young's Modulus,E N-Value (%) Profile
GL-(m) (m/s) (m/s) m/s2 (g/cm3) kgf/cm2 GPa Poisson's kgf/cm2 GPa (Depth,m)
0.5 - - - - - - - - -
1.0 906.92 292.78 9.81 1.8 - - - - - 8 Firm Stiff Medium Brown With Light Grey and
1.5 906.92 292.78 9.81 1.8 1572.85 0.154 0.442 4,535.55 0.445 Light Black Sandy SILT
2.0 920.78 294.63 9.81 1.8 1592.81 0.156 0.443 4,596.75 0.451
2.5 920.78 294.63 9.81 1.8 1592.81 0.16 0.443 4,596.75 0.451 10 Stiff Medium Grey with pale Brown sandy
3.0 1181.88 290.02 9.81 1.8 1,543.33 0.151 0.468 4,531.11 0.444 12 SILT
3.5 1181.88 290.02 9.81 1.8 1,543.33 0.151 0.468 4,531.11 0.444
4.0 965.66 255.95 9.81 1.8 1,201.99 0.118 0.462 3,515.14 0.345
4.5 965.66 255.95 9.81 1.8 1,201.99 0.118 0.462 3,515.14 0.345 27 Very Stiff Medium Orange with medium grey
5.0 1395.95 306.52 9.81 1.8 1,723.90 0.169 0.475 5,084.36 0.499 Sandy SILT
5.5 1395.95 306.52 9.81 1.8 1,723.90 0.169 0.475 5,084.36 0.499
6.0 1327.08 300.28 9.81 1.8 1,654.45 0.162 0.473 4,874.07 0.478 20
Very Stiff Medium Orange with Light grey and
6.5 1327.08 300.28 9.81 1.8 1,654.45 0.162 0.473 4,874.07 0.478
Light Purple sandy
7.0 1391.44 313.96 9.81 1.8 1,808.66 0.177 0.473 5,328.96 0.523
7.5 1391.44 313.96 9.81 1.8 1,808.66 0.177 0.473 5,328.96 0.523 22
8.0 1313.83 307.52 9.81 1.8 1,735.21 0.170 0.471 5,105.04 0.501 Very Stiff medium purple with light grey sandy
8.5 1313.83 307.52 9.81 1.8 1,735.21 0.170 0.471 5,105.04 0.501
9.0 984.64 234.87 9.81 1.8 1,012.20 0.099 0.470 2,975.53 0.292 14
Stiff Medium Orange with Medium Brown
9.5 984.64 234.87 9.81 1.8 1,012.20 0.099 0.470 2,975.53 0.292 sandy SILT
10.0 997.23 225.34 9.81 1.8 931.72 0.091 0.473 2,745.02 0.269
10.5 997.23 225.34 9.81 1.8 931.72 0.091 0.473 2,745.02 0.269 15
11.0 1867.21 449.46 9.81 1.8 3706.69 0.364 0.469 10,892.09 1.068
11.5 1867.21 449.46 9.81 1.8 3706.69 0.364 0.469 10,892.09 1.068
12.0 1730.90 396.85 9.81 1.8 2889.76 0.28 0.472 8,508.95 0.834 32
Hard Medium Purple with Light Grey Sandy
12.5 1730.90 396.85 9.81 1.8 2,889.76 0.283 0.472 8,508.95 0.834 SILT
13.0 1809.33 400.03 9.81 1.8 2,936.25 0.288 0.474 8,657.84 0.849
13.5 1809.33 400.03 9.81 1.8 2,936.25 0.288 0.474 8,657.84 0.849 27 Very Stiff medium purple with light grey sandy
14.0 1865.74 410.05 9.81 1.8 3,085.08 0.303 0.475 9,098.67 0.892 SILT
14.5 1865.74 410.05 9.81 1.8 3,085.08 0.303 0.475 9,098.67 0.892
15.0 1835.97 448.32 9.81 1.8 3,687.86 0.362 0.468 10,829.75 1.062 29
15.5 1835.97 448.32 9.81 1.8 3,687.86 0.362 0.468 10,829.75 1.062 Very Stiff medium purple with light Yellow
16.0 1874.98 474.52 9.81 2.0 4,590.56 0.450 0.466 13,457.54 1.320 sandy SILT
16.5 1874.98 474.52 9.81 2.0 4,590.56 0.450 0.466 13,457.54 1.320 50
Hard Medium Purple with Light Grey and Fale
17.0 1807.50 497.13 9.81 2.0 5,038.58 0.494 0.459 14,703.40 1.442 Yellow Sandy SILT
17.5 1807.50 497.13 9.81 2.0 5,038.58 0.494 0.459 14,703.40 1.442
18.0 1973.79 471.53 9.81 2.0 4,532.86 0.445 0.470 13,324.23 1.307 50
18.5 1973.79 471.53 9.81 2.0 4,532.86 0.445 0.470 13,324.23 1.307
19.0 1978.73 495.84 9.81 2.0 5,012.34 0.492 0.467 14,701.19 1.442
19.5 1978.73 495.84 9.81 2.0 5,012.34 0.492 0.467 14,701.19 1.442 50
20.0 1989.35 522.45 9.81 2.0 5,564.78 0.546 0.463 16,282.09 1.597
Hard medium purple with pale grey, yellow and
20.5 1989.35 522.45 9.81 2.0 5564.78 0.546 0.463 16,282.09 1.597 dark orange mottled sandy SILT
21.0 1978.05 501.65 9.81 2.0 5130.57 0.503 0.466 15,039.06 1.475 50
21.5 1978.05 501.65 9.81 2.0 5130.57 0.50 0.466 15,039.06 1.475
22.0 2109.71 624.29 9.81 2.0 7,945.82 0.779 0.452 23,074.91 2.263
22.5 2109.71 624.29 9.81 2.0 7,945.82 0.779 0.452 23,074.91 2.263 50
23.0 2141.55 614.75 9.81 2.0 7,704.80 0.756 0.455 22,422.48 2.199
23.5 2141.55 614.75 9.81 2.0 7,704.80 0.756 0.455 22,422.48 2.199
24.0 2131.38 644.55 9.81 2.0 8469.92 0.831 0.450 24,557.18 2.408 50
24.5 2131.38 644.55 9.81 2.0 8469.92 0.831 0.450 24,557.18 2.408
25.0 2175.03 634.37 9.81 2.0 8204.35 0.80 0.454 23,850.25 2.339
25.5 2175.03 634.37 9.81 2.0 8,204.35 0.805 0.454 23,850.25 2.339 50
Hard medium purple with pale grey dark yellow
26.0 2186.34 605.71 9.81 2.0 7,479.83 0.734 0.458 21,817.67 2.140 an dark orange mottled sandy SILT
26.5 2186.34 605.71 9.81 2.0 7,479.83 0.734 0.458 21,817.67 2.140
27.0 2112.20 638.15 9.81 2.0 8,302.46 0.814 0.450 24,073.39 2.361
27.5 2112.20 638.15 9.81 2.0 8302.46 0.814 0.450 24,073.39 2.361
28.0 2142.23 629.45 9.81 2.0 8077.62 0.792 0.453 23,469.58 2.302 50
Analysis Result of Downhole PS-Logging
Project Name: Downhole PS Logging Survey at Pengerang Johor BH No.: PBH 10-10
Page 1 of 2
Soil Column
Depth (m) Symbol ( : G.L) N-Value Poisson's Ratio G (Gpa) E (Gpa)
Top Soil 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.4 0.42 0.44 0.46 0.48 0.5 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
__ 0 0 0
0 0
_
_
_
_
__ 1 x x x
Firm Stiff Medium Brown With 1 1 1 1
_ x x
_ x x x Light Grey and Light Black
_ x x Sandy SILT
_ x x x
__ 2 x x 2 2 2 2
_ x x x
_ x x
_ x x x
_ x x
Stiff Medium Grey with pale
__ 3 x x x Brown sandy SILT 3 3 3 3
_ x x x
_ x x -Ditto-
_
_
__ 4 4 4 4 4
_ No Recovery
_
_ x x x
_ x x
__ 5 x x x 5 5 5 5
_ x x Very Stiff Medium Orange with
_ x x x
medium grey Sandy SILT
_ x x
_ x x x
__ 6 x x 6 6 6 6
_
_ Very Stiff Medium Orange with
_ Light grey and Light Purple
_
__ 7 sandy 7 7 7
7
_
_
_
_ Very Stiff medium purple with
__ 8 light grey sandy 8 8 8 8
_
_
_
_
__ 9 9 9 9 9
_ x x x
_ x x Stiff Medium Orange with
_ x x x
Medium Brown sandy SILT
_ x x
__ 10 x x x 10 10 10 10
_ x x
_ x x x
_ x x
_ x x x
__ 11 x x 11 11 11 11
_ x x x
_ x x -Ditto-
_ x x x
_ x x
__ 12 x x x 12 12 12 12
_ x x
_ x x x
_ x x
Hard Medium Purple with Light
_ x x x Grey Sandy SILT
__ 13 x x 13 13 13 13
_ x x x
_ x x
_ x x
_ x x x
__ 14 x x 14 14 14 14
_ x x x Very Stiff medium purple with
_ x x
light grey sandy SILT
_ x x x
_ x x
__ 15 x x x 15 15 15 15
_ x x
_ x x x
_ x x Very Stiff medium purple with
_ x x x
light Yellow sandy SILT
__ 16 x x 16 16 16 16
_ x x x
_ x x
_ x x x
_ x x Hard Medium Purple with Light
__ 17 x x x 17 17 17 17
_ x x Grey and Fale Yellow Sandy
_ x x x SILT
_ x x
_ x x x
__ 18 x x 18 18 18 18
_ x x x
_ x x
_ x x x
_ x x Hard, -Ditto-
__ 19 x x x 19 19 19 19
_ x x
_ x x x
_ x x
_ x x x
__ 20 x x Hard, -Ditto- 20 20 20 20
Analysis Result of Downhole PS-Logging
Project Name: Downhole PS Logging Survey at Pengerang Johor BH No.: PBH 10-10
Page 2 of 2
Soil Column
Depth (m) Symbol ( : G.L) N-Value Poisson's Ratio G (Gpa) E (Gpa)
x x x
0 20 40 60 80 100 0.4 0.42 0.44 0.46 0.48 0.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
__20 x x 0 1 2 3 4
20 20 20 20
_ x x x
_ x x Hard medium purple with pale
_ x x x grey, yellow and dark orange
_ x x
mottled sandy SILT
__ 21 x x x 21 21 21 21
_ x x
_ x x x
_ x x
_ x x x
__ 22 x x 22 22 22 22
_ x x x
_ x x
_ x x x
_ x x -Ditto-
__23 x x x 23 23 23 23
_ x x
_ x x x
_ x x
_ x x x
__24 x x 24 24 24 24
_ x x x Hard medium purple with pale
_ x x grey dark yellow an dark orange
_ x x x
_ x x
mottled sandy SILT
__ 25 x x x 25 25 25 25
_ x x x
_ x x
_ x x x
_ x x
__ 26 x x x 26 26 26 26
_ x x
_ x x x
_ x x
_ x x x
__ 27 x x 27 27 27 27
_ x x x
_ x x
_ x x x
_
__28 28 28 28 28
_
_
_
_
__ 29 29 29 29 29
_
_
_
_
__ 30 30 30 30 30
_
_
_
_
__ 31 31 31 31 31
_
_
_
_
__ 32 32 32 32 32
_
_
_
_
__ 33 33 33 33 33
_
_
_
_
__ 34 34 34 34 34
_
_
_
_
__ 35 35 35 35 35
_
_
_
_
__ 36 36 36 36 36
_
_
_
_
__ 37 37 37 37 37
_
_
_
_
__ 38 38 38 38 38
_
_
_
_
__ 39 39 39 39 39
_
_
_
_
__ 40 40 40 40 40
APPENDIX B
Site Photographs
RefineryProcessArea
Photo1 : DownholePSLoggingLocationatPBH1010
OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
FEED PHASE B 2 / 30
Subject to the provision of Article 13 of the CONTRACT, TECHNIP hereby grant PETRONAS the copyright of this document. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the copyright owner.
OWNER REFERENCE
SUB12-
GLB
APPENDIX J
Summary and Results of Laboratory Test
copyright owner.

GEOLAB (M) SDN. BHD. (Reg. No.210351-V)
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Foundation. Soil & Concrete Specialists
Project : Additional Soil Investigation factual Report For RAPID Project - Customer : M/S Technip Geoproduction (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Refinery Process Area Job No : GLSB/SI/ 2566-122 (Refinery Process) /2013
Date : 16-Nov-13
MARKING CLASSIFICATION TEST SOIL STRENGTH TEST COMPRESSIBILITY TEST ROCK TEST CHEMICAL TEST
Triaxial Compression
Compression Test
Bulk Unit Weight
Modulus Young's
Moisture Content
Chloride Content
Chloride Content
Sulphate Content
Sulphate Content
Particle Size Distribution Atterberg Limit 1-D Consolidation Test
Organic Content
Linear Shinkage
Specific Gravity
Point Load Test
Poisson Ratio's
Test
Uniaxial
Borehole No.
Plastic Index
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Void Pre-con. Comp.
Sample No.
IS
UU CU
pH
Depth
Gravel
Ratio Pressure Index
Sand
Clay
Silt
C f Cu f e Pc Cc
metre % kg/mm3 Mg/m3 % % % % % % % % kN/m2 deg. kN/m2 deg. kN/m2 MPa MPa GPa % % g/l mg/l %
PBH P1/D2 1.00 27 3 23 35 39 55 22 33

10-1 UD1 3.50 24 19.07 2.63 0 3 54 43 57 30 27 46.0 0 0.588 220.0 0.149 4.2 <0.01 <0.01 0.34
P6/D7 7.50 21 0 86 9 5 41 29 12
P8/D9 10.50 28 3 47 31 19 40 30 10
P10/D11 13.50 28 2.48 7 50 31 12 35 24 11
P13/D14 18.00 25 1 63 26 10 NP NP NP
P16/D17 22.50 17 1 59 26 14 33 27 6
Water Sample 3.4 0.09 17
PBH P1/D2 1.00 25 1 57 22 20 43 28 15

10-2 UD1 5.00 28 19.20 2.66 0 46 14 40 64 28 36 48.0 0 0.930 316.0 0.252 4.6 <0.01 <0.01 0.18
P7/D7 9.00 33 2 44 34 20 51 33 18
P10/D10 13.50 32 2 45 34 19 49 31 18
P13/D13 18.00 29 2.44 6 53 27 14 47 32 15
P16/D16 22.50 27 2 56 28 14 45 32 13
P18/D18 25.50 21 3 56 30 11 46 31 15
P20/D20 28.50 23 8 54 25 13 45 33 12
NOTE; NP : NON-PLASTIC NES : NOT ENOUGH SAMPLE NA : NOT APPLICABLE * TESTING IN PROGRESS
Prepared By : Checked By:

(Siti Zalipah Jumary) (Norfazihah Hamadun)
Eng. Geologist Eng. Geologist
GEOLAB (M) SDN. BHD. (Reg. No.210351-V)
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Project : Additional Soil Investigation factual Report For RAPID Project - Customer : M/S Technip Geoproduction (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Refinery Process Area Job No : GLSB/SI/ 2566-122 (Refinery Process) /2013
Date : 16-Nov-13
MARKING CLASSIFICATION TEST SOIL STRENGTH TEST COMPRESSIBILITY TEST ROCK TEST CHEMICAL TEST
Triaxial Compression
Compression Test
Bulk Unit Weight
Modulus Young's
Moisture Content
Chloride Content
Chloride Content
Sulphate Content
Sulphate Content
Particle Size Distribution Atterberg Limit 1-D Consolidation Test
Organic Content
Linear Shinkage
Specific Gravity
Point Load Test
Poisson Ratio's
Test
Uniaxial
Borehole No.
Plastic Index
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Void Pre-con. Comp.
Sample No.
IS
UU CU
pH
Depth
Gravel
Ratio Pressure Index
Sand
Clay
Silt
C f Cu f e Pc Cc
metre % kg/mm3 Mg/m3 % % % % % % % % kN/m2 deg. kN/m2 deg. kN/m2 MPa MPa GPa % % g/l mg/l %
PBH P1/D2 1.00 34 1 24 36 39 NES - - 4.0 0.07 <0.01 0.10

10-3 P3/D4 3.00 12 0 50 37 13 28 17 11
P6/D7 7.50 22 0 31 26 43 68 34 34
P9/D10 12.00 25 10 57 21 12 40 29 11
P11/D12 15.00 17 2.45 1 53 34 12 39 28 11
P14/D15 19.50 14 3 67 22 8 NP NP NP
P16/D17 22.50 14 11 58 25 6 NP NP NP
PBH P1/D2 1.00 26 2.43 1 61 9 29 56 28 28

10-4 P3/D4 3.00 33 3 26 29 42 75 39 36
UD1 5.00 37 17.48 0 18 40 42 65 32 33 80.0 0 1.136 376.0 0.346 4.3 <0.01 <0.01 0.17
P6/D7 7.50 39 1 23 48 28 58 36 22
P9/D10 12.00 28 2.44 1 49 36 14 41 27 14
P11/D12 15.00 23 2 52 33 13 40 28 12
P14/D15 19.50 17 1 59 29 11 43 29 14
P16/D17 22.50 17 2 65 25 8 NP NP NP
NOTE; NP : NON-PLASTIC NES : NOT ENOUGH SAMPLE NA : NOT APPLICABLE * TESTING IN PROGRESS
Prepared By : Checked By:

(Siti Zalipah Jumary) (Norfazihah Hamadun)
Eng. Geologist Eng. Geologist
BOREHOLE

CLASSIFICATION TEST

GLSB/SI/2566-122 (Refinery Process)/2013 2nd September 2013
1 of 297
Subject Matter : Determination of Moisture Content, Atterberg Limit, Linear Shrinkage,

Particle Density, Particle Size Distribution for Coarse Grained and
Particle Size Distribution for Fine Grained on soil sample submitted.
Tested For : M/S TECHNIP GEOPRODUCTION (M) SDN. BHD.

Customer : M/S TECHNIP GEOPRODUCTION (M) SDN. BHD.
Dijaya Plaza, 10th Floor, No. 237, Jalan Tun Razak,
50400 Kuala Lumpur.
Test Methods : Reference Method/Tests

BS 1377 : Part 2 : 1990 : Clause 3 : Moisture Content
BS 1377 : Part 2 : 1990 : Clause 4 : Liquid Limit
BS 1377 : Part 2 : 1990 : Clause 5 : Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index
BS 1377 : Part 2 : 1990 : Clause 8 : Particle Density
BS 1377 : Part 2 : 1990 : Clause 9 : Particle Size Distribution
BS 1377 : Part 2 : 1990 : Clause 3 : Linear Shrinkage *
* Not Under Standard Malaysia Scope of Accreditation
Project : Additional Soil Investigation Factual Report for RAPID Project
Refinery Process Area.
Date Received : Refer to individual samples test reports.

Sample Description : Refer to individual samples test reports.
Conditions of Receipts : Refer to individual samples test reports.
Results : Refer to individual samples test reports.
Authorized Signatories:
Siti Zalipah Binti Jumary Ir. Koo Kean Siang

B.Sc.(Geology)(Hons.) B.Tech(Civil), M. Eng (Geotech)
MIEM P. Eng.
GLSB/SI/ 2566-122(Refinery Process) /2013 2nd September 2013
2 of 297
Table 1.00 Moisture Content
Soil Specimen No. Mass of Mass of

Mass of Mass of Mass of Moisture
Date Received
Borehole No.
wet soil + dry soil + Ave.

Sample No.
Date tested
container moisture dry soil Content

Depth container container Moisture
m2-m3 Content
m1 m2 m3 m2-m3 m3-m1 x 100
m3-m1
metre (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) % %
1 95.34 123.72 117.74 5.98 22.40 26.70
P1/D2 1.00 27
2 95.58 128.84 121.86 6.98 26.28 26.56
1 95.84 126.10 120.88 5.22 25.04 20.85
P6/D7 7.50 21
2 95.72 129.48 123.62 5.86 27.90 21.00
1 95.32 124.72 118.26 6.46 22.94 28.16
P8/D9 10.50 28
2 95.40 127.84 120.60 7.24 25.20 28.73
PBH 10-1
1 95.62 134.18 125.78 8.40 30.16 27.85
P10/D11 13.50 28
2 95.86 133.06 124.86 8.20 29.00 28.28
1 95.44 124.60 118.72 5.88 23.28 25.26
P13/D14 18.00 25
2 95.58 132.92 125.36 7.56 29.78 25.39
1 95.48 124.58 120.22 4.36 24.74 17.62
P16/D17 22.50 17
2 95.34 134.16 128.48 5.68 33.14 17.14
1 95.64 119.66 114.90 4.76 19.26 24.71
P2/D2 1.00 25
2 95.64 136.56 128.44 8.12 32.80 24.76
1 95.44 132.54 123.49 9.05 28.05 32.26
24-Aug-13
28-Aug-13
P7/D7 9.00 33
2 95.04 135.92 125.76 10.16 30.72 33.07
1 95.56 145.56 133.28 12.28 37.72 32.56
P10/D10 13.50 32
2 95.56 145.86 133.78 12.08 38.22 31.61
1 95.42 123.98 117.58 6.40 22.16 28.88
PBH 10-2 P13/D13 18.00 29
2 95.70 117.52 112.62 4.90 16.92 28.96
1 95.44 139.84 130.40 9.44 34.96 27.00
P16/D16 22.50 27
2 95.32 137.12 128.16 8.96 32.84 27.28
1 95.58 133.40 126.88 6.52 31.30 20.83
P18/D18 25.50 21
2 95.36 135.06 128.16 6.90 32.80 21.04
1 95.62 127.44 121.66 5.78 26.04 22.20
P20/D20 28.50 23
2 95.12 134.86 127.30 7.56 32.18 23.49
1 95.22 121.26 114.58 6.68 19.36 34.50
P1/D2 1.00 34
2 95.58 119.68 113.60 6.08 18.02 33.74
1 95.60 133.14 129.20 3.94 33.60 11.73
PBH 10-3 P3/D4 3.00 12
2 95.42 131.48 127.48 4.00 32.06 12.48
1 95.42 141.16 133.22 7.94 37.80 21.01
P6/D7 7.50 22
2 95.74 124.88 119.60 5.28 23.86 22.13
3 of 297

Date Received
Borehole No.

Sample No.
Date tested

m2-m3 Content
m1 m2 m3 m2-m3 m3-m1 x 100
m3-m1
metre (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) % %
1 95.38 132.34 124.90 7.44 29.52 25.20
P9/D10 12.00 25
2 96.62 132.14 124.94 7.20 28.32 25.42
1 95.74 135.14 129.30 5.84 33.56 17.40
P11/D12 15.00 17
2 94.06 129.04 124.04 5.00 29.98 16.68
PBH 10-3
1 95.58 121.30 118.18 3.12 22.60 13.81
P14/D15 19.50 14
2 95.48 131.28 126.66 4.62 31.18 14.82
1 95.30 127.24 123.14 4.10 27.84 14.73
P16/D17 22.50 14
2 95.78 140.76 135.56 5.20 39.78 13.07
1 95.52 126.06 119.80 6.26 24.28 25.78
P1/D2 1.00 26
2 95.30 133.46 125.76 7.70 30.46 25.28
1 94.00 111.78 107.30 4.48 13.30 33.68
P3/D4 3.00 33
2 95.56 116.50 111.30 5.20 15.74 33.04
1 95.56 136.36 124.96 11.40 29.40 38.78
P6/D7 7.50 39
2 95.58 130.52 120.84 9.68 25.26 38.32
1 95.70 127.48 120.48 7.00 24.78 28.25
24-Aug-13
28-Aug-13
PBH 10-4 P9/D10 12.00 28

2 94.99 139.24 129.76 9.48 34.77 27.26
1 95.62 128.48 122.40 6.08 26.78 22.70
P11/D12 15.00 23
2 95.80 129.68 123.28 6.40 27.48 23.29
1 95.94 140.64 134.08 6.56 38.14 17.20
P14/D15 19.50 17
2 95.42 132.44 126.99 5.45 31.57 17.26
1 93.88 133.48 127.66 5.82 33.78 17.23
P16/D17 22.50 17
2 95.50 133.92 128.28 5.64 32.78 17.21
1 95.66 125.62 119.60 6.02 23.94 25.15
P2/D3 2.00 26
2 95.48 123.99 118.04 5.95 22.56 26.37
1 95.82 131.36 121.80 9.56 25.98 36.80
P4/D5 4.50 37
2 95.66 141.50 129.28 12.22 33.62 36.35
1 95.38 130.74 120.66 10.08 25.28 39.87
PBH 10-5 P6/D7 7.50 40
2 93.99 129.52 119.22 10.30 25.23 40.82
1 95.58 144.00 133.14 10.86 37.56 28.91
P9/D10 12.00 29
2 95.78 138.58 128.74 9.84 32.96 29.85
1 95.38 139.02 129.42 9.60 34.04 28.20
P13/D14 16.50 28
2 95.00 147.08 135.84 11.24 40.84 27.52
4 of 297

Date Received
Borehole No.

Sample No.
Date tested

m2-m3 Content
m1 m2 m3 m2-m3 m3-m1 x 100
m3-m1
metre (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) % %
1 95.56 125.70 119.10 6.60 23.54 28.04
P15/D16 19.50 28
2 95.28 128.88 121.56 7.32 26.28 27.85
24-Aug-13
28-Aug-13
1 95.50 125.06 119.58 5.48 24.08 22.76

PBH 10-5 P17/D18 22.50 22
2 95.32 133.92 127.04 6.88 31.72 21.69
1 95.48 120.00 116.84 3.16 21.36 14.79
P19/D20 25.50 15
2 96.06 125.92 122.02 3.90 25.96 15.02
1 94.76 140.76 132.58 8.18 37.82 21.63
P2/D2 2.00 22
2 94.32 132.24 125.26 6.98 30.94 22.56
20-Aug-13
24-Aug-13
1 93.92 137.58 127.16 10.42 33.24 31.35

PBH 10-6 P9/D9 12.00 32
2 91.92 139.12 127.76 11.36 35.84 31.70
1 92.26 112.42 110.36 2.06 18.10 11.38
P12/D12 16.50 12
2 91.04 116.58 113.80 2.78 22.76 12.21
1 95.38 136.16 128.08 8.08 32.70 24.71
P1/D2 1.00 24
2 95.66 141.12 132.40 8.72 36.74 23.73
1 95.78 120.62 113.54 7.08 17.76 39.86
P5/D6 6.00 40
2 95.64 131.34 121.08 10.26 25.44 40.33
1 95.58 134.00 123.80 10.20 28.22 36.14
P6/D7 7.50 36
2 95.52 132.68 122.82 9.86 27.30 36.12
24-Aug-13
28-Aug-13
1 95.66 129.48 122.04 7.44 26.38 28.20

PBH 10-7 P8/D9 10.50 29
2 95.04 133.96 125.08 8.88 30.04 29.56
1 95.58 127.82 121.52 6.30 25.94 24.29
P11/D12 15.00 24
2 95.64 130.30 123.56 6.74 27.92 24.14
1 95.64 129.66 124.06 5.60 28.42 19.70
P14/D15 19.50 20
2 95.98 131.90 126.00 5.90 30.02 19.65
1 95.60 129.24 124.34 4.90 28.74 17.05
P16/D17 22.50 17
2 95.58 154.78 146.00 8.78 50.42 17.41
1 95.44 126.99 118.00 8.99 22.56 39.85
P1/D2 1.00 40
2 94.34 129.78 119.58 10.20 25.24 40.41
20-Aug-13
24-Aug-13
1 91.89 122.32 114.54 7.78 22.65 34.35

PBH 10-8 P3/D4 3.00 35
2 91.76 123.58 115.34 8.24 23.58 34.94
1 94.78 142.20 134.32 7.88 39.54 19.93
P5/D6 6.00 20
2 92.54 143.52 134.70 8.82 42.16 20.92
19 of 297
Table 3.00 Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index
Borehole No. PBH 10-1

Sample Ref. P1/D2 P8/D9 P10/D11 P13/D14
Depth 1.00 10.50 13.50 18.00
Date Received 24-Aug-13
Date Tested 31-Aug-13
Sample Preparation* B B B B
Weight of sample g 272.84 270.56 338.00 340.60
Weight of sample passing 425um g 125.96 154.94 180.06 203.18
% Passing 425um % 46 57 53 60
Test No. 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Initial dial gauge reading mm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Final dial gauge reading mm 20.2 20.3 20.2 20.3 21.3 21.4 20.5 20.6
Cone penetration mm 20.2 20.3 20.2 20.3 21.3 21.4 20.5 20.6
Average mm 20.3 20.3 21.4 20.6
Mass of container g 86.52 83.71 102.07 104.31 102.40 101.20 103.77 102.74
Mass of wet sample + container g 98.53 96.52 116.10 118.17 114.81 114.89 117.47 117.81
Mass of dried sample + container g 94.27 91.95 112.03 114.17 111.26 110.90 113.91 113.88
Mass of moisture g 4.26 4.57 4.07 4.00 3.55 3.99 3.56 3.93
Mass of dry sample g 7.75 8.24 9.96 9.86 8.86 9.70 10.14 11.14
Moisture content % 55 55 41 41 40 41 35 35
Average (w) % 55 41 41 35
FACTOR** 1.000 1.000 0.984 0.984
LIQUID LIMIT ( w x FACTOR ) % 55 41 40 35
Average % 22 29 30 24
PLASTIC LIMIT % 22 29 30 24
PLASTICITY INDEX =
% 33 12 10 11
Liquid Limit - Plastic Limit
* A) As received B) Oven dried at below 50 oC and sieved on 425um
** Base on Table 1 : Factors For One-Point Cone Penetrometer Liquid Limit Test; BS 1377 : Part 2 : 1990 : 4.4
20 of 297

Sample Ref. P16/D17
Depth 22.50
Sample Preparation* B
Weight of sample g 252.86
Weight of sample passing 425um g 165.4
% Passing 425um % 65
Test No. 1 2
Initial dial gauge reading mm 0.0 0.0
Final dial gauge reading mm 21.9 22.1
Cone penetration mm 21.9 22.1
Average mm 22.0
Mass of container g 104.16 101.14
Mass of wet sample + container g 117.39 114.64
Mass of dried sample + container g 114.03 111.15
Mass of moisture g 3.36 3.49
Mass of dry sample g 9.87 10.01
Moisture content % 34 35
Average (w) % 34
FACTOR** 0.971
LIQUID LIMIT ( w x FACTOR ) % 33
Mass of container g 43.27 43.24
Mass of wet sample + container g 46.25 46.22
Mass of dried sample + container g 45.62 45.58
Mass of moisture g 0.63 0.64
Mass of dry sample g 2.35 2.34
Moisture content % 27 27
Average % 27
PLASTIC LIMIT % 27
PLASTICITY INDEX =
% 6
21 of 297

Sample Ref. P2/D2 P7/D7 P10/D10 P13/D13
Depth 1.00 9.00 13.50 18.00
Sample Preparation* B B B B
Weight of sample g 309.10 372.30 317.80 401.60
Weight of sample passing 425um g 128.25 181.4 163.84 155.69
% Passing 425um % 41 49 52 39
Test No. 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Initial dial gauge reading mm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Final dial gauge reading mm 17.4 17.5 18.7 18.8 18.8 18.9 20.8 20.9
Cone penetration mm 17.4 17.5 18.7 18.8 18.8 18.9 20.8 20.9
Average mm 17.5 18.8 18.9 20.9
Average (w) % 42 50 48 48
FACTOR** 1.039 1.020 1.020 0.984
LIQUID LIMIT ( w x FACTOR ) % 43 51 49 47
Average % 28 33 31 32
PLASTIC LIMIT % 28 33 31 32
PLASTICITY INDEX =
% 15 18 18 15
22 of 297

Sample Ref. P16/D16 P18/D18 P20/D20
Depth 22.50 25.50 28.50
Sample Preparation* B B B
Weight of sample g 330.30 243.08 224.7
Weight of sample passing 425um g 138.08 121.47 127.37
% Passing 425um % 42 50 57
Test No. 1 2 1 2 1 2
Initial dial gauge reading mm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Final dial gauge reading mm 24.7 24.8 24.3 24.4 23.7 23.8
Cone penetration mm 24.7 24.8 24.3 24.4 23.7 23.8
Average mm 24.8 24.4 23.8
Mass of container g 52.95 56.26 60.26 60.77 58.09 52.23
Mass of wet sample + container g 61.49 65.26 66.98 68.69 66.13 62.16
Mass of dried sample + container g 58.73 62.29 64.80 66.09 63.51 58.98
Mass of moisture g 2.76 2.97 2.18 2.60 2.62 3.18
Mass of dry sample g 5.78 6.03 4.54 5.32 5.42 6.75
Moisture content % 48 49 48 49 48 47
Average (w) % 49 48 48
FACTOR** 0.934 0.943 0.943
LIQUID LIMIT ( w x FACTOR ) % 45 46 45
Mass of container g 53.37 57.82 59.31 59.68 59.06 61.01
Mass of wet sample + container g 56.67 60.95 62.77 62.92 62.49 64.18
Mass of dried sample + container g 55.87 60.20 61.93 62.16 61.66 63.39
Mass of moisture g 0.80 0.75 0.84 0.76 0.83 0.79
Mass of dry sample g 2.50 2.38 2.62 2.48 2.60 2.38
Moisture content % 32 32 32 31 32 33
Average % 32 31 33
PLASTIC LIMIT % 32 31 33
PLASTICITY INDEX =
% 13 15 12
76 of 297
Table 4.00 Linear Shrinkage
Linear Shrinkage
Initial Length Oven Dried LD
Depth Mould
Borehole No. Sample No. LO Length LD 100 x 1-
Code LO
metre (mm) (mm) %
PBH 10-9 P1/D2 1.00 LS002 127.00 112.70 11.26
PBH 10-11 P2/D2 2.00 LS003 127.00 111.40 12.28
PBH 10-15 P3/D4 3.00 NOT ENOUGH SAMPLE
PBH 10-17 P2/D2 2.00 LS027 126.60 114.90 9.24
PBH 10-22 P1/D2 1.00 LS030 125.70 113.20 9.94
PBH 10-31 P1/D2 1.00 NOT ENOUGH SAMPLE
* Not Under Standard Malaysia Scope of Accreditation

GLSB/SI/ 2566-122 (Refinery Process) /2013 2nd September 2013
77 of 297
Table 5.00 Particle Size Distribution

Borehole No. : PBH 10-1 Sample No. : P1/D2 Depth (m) : 1.00
Sieve Size Weight of Soil Retained * Percent Retained Percent Passing
(mm) (g) (%) (%)
10.0 0.00 0.00 100.00
6.3 0.00 0.00 100.00
5.0 0.26 0.51 99.49
3.4 0.44 0.87 98.62
2.0 0.80 1.58 97.04
1.18 2.12 4.19 92.85
0.600 3.34 6.60 86.25
0.425 1.34 2.65 83.60
0.300 1.28 2.53 81.07
0.212 0.92 1.82 79.26
0.150 0.86 1.70 77.56
0.063 1.72 3.40 74.16
Pan
HYDROMETER READING Note: * Weight of Soil Retained during DRY sieving do not include WET sieving portion passing 63 m
Hydrometer
Elapsed Time True Reading Effective Depth Modified Reading Particle Diameter % Finer
Reading
t (min) Rh' Rh Hr (mm) R D (mm) k
1 20.50 21.00 134.92 21.00 0.050 69.52
2 19.50 20.00 138.68 20.00 0.036 66.21
4 19.00 19.50 140.56 19.50 0.025 64.55
8 18.50 19.00 142.44 19.00 0.018 62.90
30 16.50 17.00 149.96 17.00 0.010 56.28
60 15.00 15.50 155.60 15.50 0.007 51.31
120 14.00 14.50 159.36 14.50 0.005 48.00
240 13.00 13.50 163.12 13.50 0.004 44.69
480 12.50 13.00 165.00 13.00 0.003 43.03
1440 10.00 10.50 174.39 10.50 0.001 34.76
100
90
80
70
Percentage Passing,%
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Grain diameter,mm
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.063 0.2 0.6 2.0 20.0 60.0

FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE MEDIUM COARSE
CLAY
SILT SAND GRAVEL COBBLE
39 % 35 % 23 % 3%
GLSB/SI/ 2566-122 (Refinery Process) /2013 2nd September 2013
78 of 297

Borehole No. : PBH 10-1 Sample No. : P6/D7 Depth (m) : 7.50
(mm) (g) (%) (%)
10.0 0.00 0.00 100.00
6.3 0.00 0.00 100.00
5.0 0.00 0.00 100.00
3.4 0.00 0.00 100.00
2.0 0.30 0.30 99.70
1.18 1.20 1.19 98.51
0.600 24.48 24.34 74.17
0.425 19.24 19.13 55.04
0.300 21.50 21.38 33.66
0.212 11.26 11.20 22.47
0.150 5.48 5.45 17.02
0.063 3.01 2.99 14.03
Pan
Hydrometer
Elapsed Time True Reading Effective Depth Modified Reading Particle Diameter % Finer
Reading
1 6.50 7.00 187.55 7.00 0.056 11.18
2 6.50 7.00 187.55 7.00 0.039 11.18
4 6.50 7.00 187.55 7.00 0.028 11.18
8 6.50 7.00 187.55 7.00 0.020 11.18
30 5.50 6.00 191.31 6.00 0.010 9.58
60 4.50 5.00 195.07 5.00 0.007 7.98
120 4.00 4.50 196.95 4.50 0.005 7.19
240 3.50 4.00 198.83 4.00 0.004 6.39
480 3.00 3.50 200.71 3.50 0.003 5.59
1440 2.50 3.00 202.59 3.00 0.002 4.79
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Grain diameter,mm
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.063 0.2 0.6 2.0 20.0 60.0
CLAY
5% 9% 86 % 0%
UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED
TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST
(UU TEST)

UU TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST
SOILPRO TECHNICAL SERVICES SDN BHD
Project : PETRONAS RAPID PROJECT SampleNo.: PBH10-01/UD1

Location : REFINERY PROCESS AREA Depth, m. : 3.50
Client : Geolab (M) Sdn Bhd Lab.Ref: L130366

Specimen A Specimen B Specimen C
CELL PRESSURE >>> 30 kN/m 60 kN/m 120 kN/m
SKETCH OF
FAILURE
CONDITION >>>
Size: 50mm x 100mm
FAILURE TYPE >>> Shear Plastic Plastic

Bulk Density 1.891 Mg/m 1.903 Mg/m 2.039 Mg/m
Moisture Content 27 % 24 % 19 %
Normal Load at Failure 0.1343 kN 0.1835 kN 0.2873 kN

Normal Stress 60.20 kN/m 83.19 kN/m 131.68 kN/m
Lateral Pressure 30.00 kN/m 60.00 kN/m 120.00 kN/m
Total Normal Stress 90.20 kN/m 143.19 kN/m 251.68 kN/m
Deformation Dial : 0.01 mm/div Av.Bulk Density : 1.944 Mg/m

Load Ring Factor : 0.00133 kN/div. Dry Density : 1.579 Mg/m
Rate of Deformation : 1.2 mm/min Av.Moisture Content : 23 %
Soil Type : (Partial) Saturated Total Stress:
Light brown SILT
Shear Strength, c = 15 kN/m
Test Method: BS1377:Part 7: Method 8 Shear Angle, = 15
Tested by: Nor Theoretical Total Stress:

Test Date: 02.09.2013 Shear Strength, c = 46 kN/m
Shear Angle, = 0
Checked by: Wong K.Y.
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280
NORMAL STRESS, kN/m2
Project: PETRONAS RAPID PROJECT Sample No. : PBH10-01/UD1
Location: REFINERY PROCESS AREA Depth, m : 3.50
Ring Factor : 0.00133 kN/div
Client: Geolab (M) Sdn Bhd Tested by : Nor
Lab.Ref : L130366 Date : 02.09.2013

DEFORMATION Cell Pressure - 30 kN/m Cell Pressure - 60 kN/m Cell Pressure - 120 kN/m
Corrected Load Deviator Load Deviator Load Deviator
dL dL Strain Area Dial Stress Dial Stress Dial Stress
(div) (mm) (%) (mm2) (div) (N) (kN/m) (div) (N) (kN/m) (div) (N) (kN/m)
0 0 0 1963.5 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0
20 0.20 0.20 1967.4 26.5 35.2 17.91 18.5 24.6 12.51 23.5 31.3 15.89
40 0.40 0.40 1971.4 38 50.5 25.64 27 35.9 18.22 31 41.2 20.91
60 0.60 0.60 1975.3 49.5 65.8 33.33 34 45.2 22.89 39.5 52.5 26.60
80 0.80 0.80 1979.3 60 79.8 40.32 40 53.2 26.88 47 62.5 31.58
100 1.00 1.00 1983.3 64 85.1 42.92 44 58.5 29.51 54.5 72.5 36.55
150 1.50 1.50 1993.4 68 90.4 45.37 50 66.5 33.36 64 85.1 42.70
200 2.00 2.00 2003.6 72 95.8 47.79 56 74.5 37.17 71.5 95.1 47.46
250 2.50 2.50 2013.8 75.5 100.4 49.86 62 82.5 40.95 80 106.4 52.83
300 3.00 3.00 2024.2 80 106.4 52.56 70.5 93.8 46.32 93 123.7 61.10
350 3.50 3.50 2034.7 81 107.7 52.95 75 99.8 49.02 108 143.6 70.59
400 4.00 4.00 2045.3 82 109.1 53.32 77 102.4 50.07 121.5 161.6 79.01
450 4.50 4.50 2056.0 84 111.7 54.34 80 106.4 51.75 130 172.9 84.09
500 5.00 5.00 2066.8 87 115.7 55.98 85 113.1 54.70 147 195.5 94.59
550 5.50 5.50 2077.8 90 119.7 57.61 89.5 119.0 57.29 159 211.5 101.78
600 6.00 6.00 2088.8 92 122.4 58.58 94 125.0 59.85 167 222.1 106.33
650 6.50 6.50 2100.0 93 123.7 58.90 97 129.0 61.43 179.5 238.7 113.68
700 7.00 7.00 2111.3 93.5 124.4 58.90 101 134.3 63.62 187 248.7 117.80
750 7.50 7.50 2122.7 94 125.0 58.90 107 142.3 67.04 194 258.0 121.55
800 8.00 8.00 2134.2 94.5 125.7 58.89 112 149.0 69.80 201 267.3 125.26
850 8.50 8.50 2145.9 95 126.4 58.88 120 159.6 74.37 205 272.7 127.06
900 9.00 9.00 2157.7 96 127.7 59.17 124.5 165.6 76.74 209 278.0 128.83
950 9.50 9.50 2169.6 96.5 128.3 59.16 128 170.2 78.47 214 284.6 131.18
1000 10.00 10.00 2181.7 97 129.0 59.13 132 175.6 80.47 216 287.3 131.68
1050 10.50 10.50 2193.8 98 130.3 59.41 135 179.6 81.84 217 288.6 131.55
1100 11.00 11.00 2206.2 98.5 131.0 59.38 138 183.5 83.19 217 288.6 130.82
1150 11.50 11.50 2218.6 99 131.7 59.35 138.5 184.2 83.03 217 288.6 130.08
1200 12.00 12.00 2231.2 101 134.3 60.20 139 184.9 82.86
1250 12.50 12.50 2244.0 101.5 135.0 60.16 139.5 185.5 82.68
1300 13.00 13.00 2256.9 102 135.7 60.11 140 186.2 82.50
1350 13.50 13.50 2269.9 102.5 136.3 60.06 140 186.2 82.03
1400 14.00 14.00 2283.1 103 137.0 60.00 140
1450 14.50 14.50 2296.5 103 137.0 59.65
1500 15.00 15.00 2310.0 103 137.0 59.30
1550 15.50 15.50 2323.7
1600 16.00 16.00 2337.5
1650 16.50 16.50 2351.5
1700 17.00 17.00 2365.7
1750 17.50 17.50 2380.0
1800 18.00 18.00 2394.5
1850 18.50 18.50 2409.2
1900 19.00 19.00 2424.1
1950 19.50 19.50 2439.1
Stress A Stress B Stress C
140
120
Sample Size
100 Dia.: 50.0 mm
Length : 100.0 mm
80 Area : 1963.5 mm
60
40
20
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Strain, %
Test Method: BS1377:Part 7: Method 8
CHECKED BY:
Project : PETRONAS RAPID PROJECT SampleNo.: PBH10-02/UD1

Location : REFINERY PROCESS AREA Depth, m. : 5.00
Client : Geolab (M) Sdn Bhd Lab.Ref: L130366

CELL PRESSURE >>> 40 kN/m 80 kN/m 160 kN/m
SKETCH OF
FAILURE
CONDITION >>>
Size: 50mm x 100mm
FAILURE TYPE >>> Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate

Bulk Density 1.915 Mg/m 1.973 Mg/m 1.983 Mg/m
Moisture Content 25 % 22 % 19 %
Normal Load at Failure 0.1729 kN 0.2128 kN 0.2886 kN

Normal Stress 75.29 kN/m 91.58 kN/m 123.47 kN/m
Lateral Pressure 40.00 kN/m 80.00 kN/m 160.00 kN/m
Total Normal Stress 115.29 kN/m 171.58 kN/m 283.47 kN/m
Deformation Dial : 0.01 mm/div Av.Bulk Density : 1.957 Mg/m

Load Ring Factor : 0.00133 kN/div. Dry Density : 1.605 Mg/m
Rate of Deformation : 1.2 mm/min Av.Moisture Content : 22 %
Soil Type : (Partial) Saturated Total Stress:
Light brown sandy CLAY
Shear Strength, c = 25 kN/m
Test Method: BS1377:Part 7: Method 8 Shear Angle, = 8
Tested by: Nor Theoretical Total Stress:

Test Date: 02.09.20013 Shear Strength, c = 48 kN/m
Shear Angle, = 0
Checked by: Wong K.Y.
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340
NORMAL STRESS, kN/m2
Project: PETRONAS RAPID PROJECT Sample No. : PBH10-02/UD1
Location: REFINERY PROCESS AREA Depth, m : 5.00
Ring Factor : 0.00133 kN/div
Client: Geolab (M) Sdn Bhd Tested by : Nor
Lab.Ref : L130366 Date : 02.09.20013

DEFORMATION Cell Pressure - 40 kN/m Cell Pressure - 80 kN/m Cell Pressure - 160 kN/m
Corrected Load Deviator Load Deviator Load Deviator
dL dL Strain Area Dial Stress Dial Stress Dial Stress
(div) (mm) (%) (mm2) (div) (N) (kN/m) (div) (N) (kN/m) (div) (N) (kN/m)
0 0 0 1963.5 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0
20 0.20 0.20 1967.4 28.5 37.9 19.27 20.5 27.3 13.86 30.5 40.6 20.62
40 0.40 0.40 1971.4 32 42.6 21.59 27 35.9 18.22 37.5 49.9 25.30
60 0.60 0.60 1975.3 40 53.2 26.93 33 43.9 22.22 43 57.2 28.95
80 0.80 0.80 1979.3 46 61.2 30.91 40.5 53.9 27.21 50 66.5 33.60
100 1.00 1.00 1983.3 52 69.2 34.87 44 58.5 29.51 56.5 75.1 37.89
150 1.50 1.50 1993.4 61.5 81.8 41.03 47 62.5 31.36 60 79.8 40.03
200 2.00 2.00 2003.6 67 89.1 44.48 50 66.5 33.19 67 89.1 44.48
250 2.50 2.50 2013.8 70 93.1 46.23 53.5 71.2 35.33 78 103.7 51.51
300 3.00 3.00 2024.2 75.5 100.4 49.61 56 74.5 36.79 90.5 120.4 59.46
350 3.50 3.50 2034.7 79 105.1 51.64 60 79.8 39.22 107 142.3 69.94
400 4.00 4.00 2045.3 82 109.1 53.32 64 85.1 41.62 116 154.3 75.43
450 4.50 4.50 2056.0 83 110.4 53.69 67 89.1 43.34 130 172.9 84.09
500 5.00 5.00 2066.8 83.5 111.1 53.73 72 95.8 46.33 137.5 182.9 88.48
550 5.50 5.50 2077.8 84 111.7 53.77 80 106.4 51.21 146 194.2 93.46
600 6.00 6.00 2088.8 86 114.4 54.76 86.5 115.0 55.08 150 199.5 95.51
650 6.50 6.50 2100.0 88 117.0 55.73 92 122.4 58.27 152.5 202.8 96.58
700 7.00 7.00 2111.3 90 119.7 56.70 99.5 132.3 62.68 154 204.8 97.01
750 7.50 7.50 2122.7 92 122.4 57.64 107 142.3 67.04 157 208.8 98.37
800 8.00 8.00 2134.2 93.5 124.4 58.27 115 153.0 71.67 159 211.5 99.08
850 8.50 8.50 2145.9 95 126.4 58.88 121 160.9 74.99 162 215.5 100.41
900 9.00 9.00 2157.7 99 131.7 61.02 126 167.6 77.67 170.5 226.8 105.10
950 9.50 9.50 2169.6 103 137.0 63.14 129 171.6 79.08 175 232.8 107.28
1000 10.00 10.00 2181.7 105 139.7 64.01 132 175.6 80.47 180 239.4 109.73
1050 10.50 10.50 2193.8 107.5 143.0 65.17 134 178.2 81.24 180.5 240.1 109.43
1100 11.00 11.00 2206.2 110 146.3 66.31 136.5 181.5 82.29 181 240.7 109.12
1150 11.50 11.50 2218.6 113.5 151.0 68.04 138 183.5 82.73 181.5 241.4 108.80
1200 12.00 12.00 2231.2 115 153.0 68.55 141 187.5 84.05 186 247.4 110.87
1250 12.50 12.50 2244.0 118 156.9 69.94 143 190.2 84.76 190 252.7 112.61
1300 13.00 13.00 2256.9 121 160.9 71.31 145 192.9 85.45 194 258.0 114.33
1350 13.50 13.50 2269.9 124 164.9 72.65 147 195.5 86.13 197 262.0 115.43
1400 14.00 14.00 2283.1 127 168.9 73.98 150 199.5 87.38 199.5 265.3 116.22
1450 14.50 14.50 2296.5 130 172.9 75.29 154 204.8 89.19 205 272.7 118.72
1500 15.00 15.00 2310.0 130 172.9 74.85 157 208.8 90.39 210 279.3 120.91
1550 15.50 15.50 2323.7 130 172.9 74.41 160 212.8 91.58 213 283.3 121.92
1600 16.00 16.00 2337.5 160 212.8 91.04 217 288.6 123.47
1650 16.50 16.50 2351.5 160 212.8 90.50 217 288.6 122.73
1700 17.00 17.00 2365.7 217 288.6 122.00
1750 17.50 17.50 2380.0
1800 18.00 18.00 2394.5
1850 18.50 18.50 2409.2
1900 19.00 19.00 2424.1
1950 19.50 19.50 2439.1
Stress A Stress B Stress C
140
120
Sample Size
100 Dia.: 50.0 mm
Length : 100.0 mm
80 Area : 1963.5 mm
60
40
20
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Strain, %
Test Method: BS1377:Part 7: Method 8
CHECKED BY:
CONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED
TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST
(CU TEST)

pwp Chg : Deviator Stress, kN/m2 Volume, ml B Value
Stress (s1'-s3')/2, kN/m2 Pore Pressure, kN/m2 Volume Change, ml

ONE DIMENSIONAL
CONSOLIDATION TEST

2 2 Void Ratio, e
Mv (m /MN) Cv (m /yr)
ONE DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION TEST
Project : PETRONAS RAPID PROJECT Borehole No. : PBH10-01

Location : REFINERY PROCESS AREA Sample No. : UD1
Lab.Ref : L130366 Depth, m. : 3.5
Customer : Geolab (M) Sdn Bhd Test Start : 28/08/2013
Test End : 07/09/2013
Note:
Specimen Size mm: 50.00 50.00 S.G. of Soil, Gs : 2.63 2.63
Wt.of Ring+Wet Soil, g: 146.66 143.11 Ht.of Solid, ho mm : 12.595 12.595 D, Total Deflection
INITIAL FINAL Ht.of Sample,h mm : 20.000 18.106 e, Void Ratio (H-ho)/ho
Weight of Ring, g: 68.09 68.09 INITIAL FINAL de, Change in Void Ratio
Weight of Wet Soil, g: 78.57 75.02 Void Ratio, e : 0.588 0.438 Cv, Coeff.of Consolidation
Weight of Dry Soil, g: 65.05 65.05 Bulk Density Mg/m3 : 2.001 2.110 Mv, Coeff.of Compressibility
Weight of Water, g: 13.52 9.97 Dry Density Mg/m3 : 1.656 1.830 k, Coeff.of Permeability
Water Content, %: 20.8 15.3 Deg of Saturation % : 93 92
Applied Pressure Sample % Height Void Mean Ht k=

Pressure Increment D Height Sample of Voids Ratio Sample t90 Cv Mvw.Cv.Mv
(kN/m2) dp,(kN/m2) (mm) H,(mm) Height H-ho,(mm) e de hm,(mm) (MIN) (m2/yr) (m2/MN) (m/yr)
0 - 20.000 100.0 7.405 0.588

25 0.014 19.910 7.86 5.60 0.36 0.01996
25 0.180 19.820 99.1 7.225 0.574
25 0.018 19.707 11.85 3.64 0.46 0.01646
50 0.226 19.594 98.0 6.999 0.556
50 0.021 19.461 8.59 4.89 0.28 0.01321
100 0.266 19.328 96.6 6.733 0.535
100 0.023 19.182 6.60 6.19 0.15 0.00932
200 0.292 19.036 95.2 6.441 0.511
200 0.027 18.865 6.16 6.41 0.09 0.00575
400 0.342 18.694 93.5 6.099 0.484
400 0.035 18.476 4.45 8.51 0.06 0.00498
800 0.436 18.258 91.3 5.663 0.450
800 0.038 18.018 12.00 3.00 0.03 0.00099
1600 0.480 17.778 88.9 5.183 0.411
1600 0.046 17.491 2.80 12.13 0.02 0.00248
3200 0.574 17.204 86.0 4.609 0.366
800 0.195 17.399 87.0 4.804 0.381 } RECOVERY
25 0.707 18.106 90.5 5.511 0.438 } RECOVERY
Ref: BS1377: 1990, Part 5, Method 3 CHECKED BY:

2 2 Void Ratio, e

Lab.Ref : L130366 Depth, m. : 5.0
Test End : 07/09/2013
Note:

0 - 20.000 100.0 9.639 0.930

25 0.008 19.960 7.48 5.91 0.16 0.00931
25 0.080 19.920 99.6 9.559 0.923
25 0.013 19.853 2.69 16.29 0.27 0.04362
50 0.135 19.785 98.9 9.424 0.910
50 0.018 19.692 3.14 13.70 0.19 0.02565
100 0.187 19.598 98.0 9.237 0.892
100 0.026 19.462 3.13 13.45 0.14 0.01856
200 0.272 19.326 96.6 8.965 0.865
200 0.037 19.136 2.82 14.43 0.10 0.01420
400 0.380 18.946 94.7 8.585 0.829
400 0.051 18.684 2.88 13.45 0.07 0.00938
800 0.524 18.422 92.1 8.061 0.778
800 0.066 18.082 2.25 16.12 0.05 0.00758
1600 0.680 17.742 88.7 7.381 0.712
1600 0.076 17.347 2.43 13.76 0.03 0.00394
3200 0.791 16.951 84.8 6.590 0.636
800 0.238 17.189 85.9 6.828 0.659 } RECOVERY
25 0.813 18.002 90.0 7.641 0.738 } RECOVERY

2 2 Void Ratio, e

Lab.Ref : L130366 Depth, m. : 5.0
Test End : 07/09/2013
Note:

0 - 20.000 100.0 10.638 1.136

25 0.011 19.949 3.01 14.69 0.21 0.02955
25 0.102 19.898 99.5 10.536 1.125
25 0.015 19.826 2.31 18.90 0.29 0.05445
50 0.145 19.753 98.8 10.391 1.110
50 0.023 19.647 2.80 15.30 0.22 0.03272
100 0.213 19.540 97.7 10.178 1.087
100 0.030 19.400 2.78 15.02 0.15 0.02142
200 0.280 19.260 96.3 9.898 1.057
200 0.044 19.056 2.46 16.39 0.11 0.01740
400 0.408 18.852 94.3 9.490 1.014
400 0.065 18.550 2.37 16.11 0.08 0.01308
800 0.604 18.248 91.2 8.886 0.949
800 0.085 17.850 2.21 16.00 0.06 0.00896
1600 0.797 17.451 87.3 8.089 0.864
1600 0.104 16.966 2.22 14.42 0.04 0.00521
3200 0.971 16.480 82.4 7.118 0.760
800 0.324 16.804 84.0 7.442 0.795 } RECOVERY
25 0.984 17.788 88.9 8.426 0.900 } RECOVERY

POINT LOAD TEST

GEOLAB (M) SDN. BHD. (Reg. No.: 210651-V)
380 & 380A Jln. Simbang, Taman Perling, 81200 Johor Bahru.
Tel : 07 - 2364932, 2379814 Fax : 07 - 2364931
POINT LOAD TEST

(ISRM : 1985)
Project : Additional Soil Investigation Factual Report for RAPID Project - Refinery Process Area
Customer : M/S Technip Geoproduction (M) Sdn. Bhd. Date Tested : 3-Sep-13
Consultant : - Job No. : GLSB/SI/2566-122/2013
Borehole No.
Sample No.
Width, W Diameter, D
Test Type
Load
Depth De2 De Is F Is(50) UCS
P
W1 W2 W D1 D2 D
(m) (mm) (mm) kN (mm2) (mm) MPa MPa MPa
PBH C1 18.30 i 113.0 99.0 106.0 45.0 41.0 43.0 15.87 5803.4 76.2 2.73 1.21 3.31 69.41
10-14
C2 19.80 i 138.0 115.0 126.5 33.0 29.2 31.1 3.92 5009.1 70.8 0.78 1.17 0.91 19.20
C3 21.30 i 69.2 68.5 68.9 51.5 51.5 51.5 4.78 4514.6 67.2 1.06 1.14 1.21 25.38
PBH C1 17.30 i 104.0 104.0 104.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 4.12 6885.7 83.0 0.60 1.26 0.75 15.78
10-26
C2 18.80 i 125.1 125.3 125.2 52.0 52.0 52.0 8.37 8289.3 91.0 1.01 1.31 1.32 27.76
PBH C1 28.00 i 61.8 61.8 61.8 40.2 37.2 38.7 1.08 3045.2 55.2 0.35 1.05 0.37 7.79
17-1
PBH C2 24.30 i 83.0 77.0 80.0 33.5 33.8 33.7 5.35 3427.6 58.5 1.56 1.07 1.67 35.16
17-2
C3 25.80 i 90.0 89.9 90.0 35.0 33.8 34.4 4.89 3939.8 62.8 1.24 1.11 1.37 28.87
Note :
d = diametral; a = axial; b = block; i = irregular lump test; = perpendicular; // = parallel to planes of weakness
UCS = (K) Is(50) : where, conversion factor, K = 21 (Christopher Mark, 2005)

GEOLAB (M) SDN. BHD. (Reg. No.: 210651-V)
380 & 380A Jln. Simbang, Taman Perling, 81200 Johor Bahru.
Tel : 07 - 2364932, 2379814 Fax : 07 - 2364931
POINT LOAD TEST

(ISRM : 1985)
Project : Additional Soil Investigation Factual Report for RAPID Project - Refinery Process Area
Customer : M/S Technip Geoproduction (M) Sdn. Bhd. Date Tested : 3-Sep-13
Consultant : - Job No. : GLSB/SI/2566-122/2013
Borehole No.
Sample No.
Width, W Diameter, D
Test Type
Load
Depth De2 De Is F Is(50) UCS
P
W1 W2 W D1 D2 D
(m) (mm) (mm) kN (mm2) (mm) MPa MPa MPa
PBH C1 23.00 i 164.0 164.2 164.1 65.0 41.8 53.4 23.20 11157.3 105.6 2.08 1.40 2.91 61.14
17-3
C2 24.50 i 120.1 120.3 120.2 44.3 42.2 43.3 7.41 6619.1 81.4 1.12 1.24 1.39 29.25
C3 26.00 i 104.0 104.0 104.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 15.29 6885.7 83.0 2.22 1.26 2.79 58.57
PBH C1 25.60 i 68.0 64.0 66.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 2.82 3781.5 61.5 0.75 1.10 0.82 17.18
17-4
C3 28.60 i 103.0 99.0 101.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 2.17 6687.1 81.8 0.32 1.25 0.41 8.51
C4 30.10 i 70.0 70.0 70.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 3.88 4634.6 68.1 0.84 1.15 0.96 20.18
Note :
d = diametral; a = axial; b = block; i = irregular lump test; = perpendicular; // = parallel to planes of weakness
UCS = (K) Is(50) : where, conversion factor, K = 21 (Christopher Mark, 2005)

YOUNGS MODULUS
&
POISSON RATIO

DETERMINATION OF YOUNG'S MODULUS, POISSON RATIO AND
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ON ROCK
Project : RAPID PROJECT, FEED PHASE
Client : M/S PETRONAS & M/S TECHNIP GEOPRODUCTION (M) SDN BHD
Job No. : Tested Date : 29-09-13
BH No. : PBH 10-6 Depth : 17 Diameter : 52.0 mm

Sample ID : C1 Length : 104.0 mm x-Area : 0.0021 mm^2
Stress Strain Graph

120.00
100.00
Stress (kN/mm2)
80.00
y = 277088x
60.00
40.00
y = -44537x
20.00
0.00
-0.002500 -0.002000 -0.001500 -0.001000 -0.000500 0.000000 0.000500 0.001000 0.001500
Strain (mm/mm)
Young Modulus = Slope of Stress Vs Axial Strain Line

= 44537 N/mm2
= 44.5 GPa
Poisson Ratio = Axial Strain Vs Lateral Strain

= 0.16 0 96.33 MPa
1000 96.33 MPa
Stress VsTime
120
100
96.33 MPa
Stress (N/mm2)
80
60
40
20
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time (sec)
UCS = Uncomfined Compressive Strength

= 96.33 MPa
PBH10-6_C1_17m.xls Page 1 - 1
BH No. : PBH 10-6 Depth : 18.5 Diameter : 52.0 mm

Stress Strain Graph

160.00
140.00
120.00
Stress (kN/mm2)
100.00
80.00
y = 319468x
60.00
40.00
y = -71745x
20.00
0.00
-0.002000 -0.001500 -0.001000 -0.000500 0.000000 0.000500 0.001000 0.001500
Strain (mm/mm)

= 71745 N/mm2
= 71.7 GPa

= 0.22 0 134.04 MPa
1000 134.04 MPa
Stress VsTime
160
140
120 134.04 MPa

Stress (N/mm2)
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time (sec)

= 134.04 MPa
PBH10-6_C2_18.5m.xls Page 1 - 1
BH No. : PBH 10-6 Depth : 20 Diameter : 52.0 mm

Stress Strain Graph

100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
Stress (kN/mm2)
60.00
50.00
40.00 y = 250375x
30.00
y = -25933x 20.00
10.00
0.00
-0.003000 -0.002500 -0.002000 -0.001500 -0.001000 -0.000500 0.000000 0.000500 0.001000 0.001500
Strain (mm/mm)

= 25933 N/mm2
= 25.9 GPa

= 0.10 0 89.52 MPa
1000 89.52 MPa
Stress VsTime
120
100
Stress (N/mm2)
80 89.52 MPa
60
40
20
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time (sec)

= 89.52 MPa
PBH10-6_C3_20m.xls Page 1 - 1
CLASSIFICATION TEST

GLSB/SI/2566-122 (Refinery Process)/2013 15th November
2013
1 of 4
Subject Matter : Determination of Moisture Content, Particle Size Distribution for Coarse
Grained and Particle Size Distribution for Fine Grained on soil sample
submitted.

50400 Kuala Lumpur.
Test Methods : Reference Method/Tests

BS 1377 : Part 2 : 1990 : Clause 3 : Moisture Content
BS 1377 : Part 2 : 1990 : Clause 9 : Particle Size Distribution

Refinery Process Area. (Trial Pit)
Date Received : Refer to individual samples test reports.

Sample Description : Refer to individual samples test reports.
Conditions of Receipts : Refer to individual samples test reports.
Results : Refer to individual samples test reports.
Siti Zalipah Binti Jumary Ir. Koo Kean Siang

B.Sc.(Geology)(Hons.) B.Tech(Civil), M. Eng (Geotech)
MIEM P. Eng.
GLSB/SI/2566-122 (Refinery Process)/2013 15th November 2013
2 of 4
Mass of Mass of
Soil Specimen No.

Date Received Mass of Mass of Mass of Moisture
Borehole No.
wet soil + dry soil +

Sample No.
Ave.
Date tested
m2-m3 Content
m1 m2 m3 m2-m3 m3-m1 x 100
m3-m1
metre (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) % %
1 93.46 130.72 125.32 5.40 31.86 16.95
13-Nov-13
25-Oct-13
NTP 12 - 0.00 16
2 91.44 132.38 126.72 5.66 35.28 16.04
1 94.84 124.78 119.44 5.34 24.60 21.71
NTP 13 - 0.50 22
2 94.16 128.48 122.30 6.18 28.14 21.96
3 of 4

Borehole No. : NTP 12 Sample No. : - Depth (m) : 0.00
(mm) (g) (%) (%)
10.0 0.00 0.00 100.00
6.3 0.00 0.00 100.00
5.0 0.00 0.00 100.00
3.4 0.52 1.03 98.97
2.0 0.82 1.63 97.34
1.18 0.94 1.87 95.47
0.600 1.24 2.46 93.01
0.425 0.52 1.03 91.98
0.300 0.62 1.23 90.75
0.212 0.82 1.63 89.12
0.150 3.92 7.78 81.34
0.063 6.40 12.70 68.64
Pan
Hydrometer Particle
Elapsed Time True Reading Effective Depth Modified Reading % Finer
Reading Diameter
1 15.00 15.50 155.60 15.50 0.051 49.41
2 14.00 14.50 159.36 14.50 0.036 46.22
4 12.00 12.50 166.88 12.50 0.026 39.85
8 11.00 11.50 170.63 11.50 0.019 36.66
30 9.00 9.50 178.15 9.50 0.010 30.28
60 8.50 9.00 180.03 9.00 0.007 28.69
120 7.50 8.00 183.79 8.00 0.005 25.50
240 6.50 7.00 187.55 7.00 0.004 22.32
480 5.50 6.00 191.31 6.00 0.003 19.13
1440 4.50 5.00 195.07 5.00 0.001 15.94
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Grain diameter,mm
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.063 0.2 0.6 2.0 20.0 60.0

CLAY
17 % 51 % 29 % 3%
4 of 4

Borehole No. : NTP 13 Sample No. : - Depth (m) : 0.50
(mm) (g) (%) (%)
10.0 0.00 0.00 100.00
6.3 0.00 0.00 100.00
5.0 0.00 0.00 100.00
3.4 0.10 0.20 99.80
2.0 0.54 1.06 98.74
1.18 2.16 4.24 94.50
0.600 7.26 14.26 80.24
0.425 3.70 7.27 72.97
0.300 3.98 7.82 65.15
0.212 2.58 5.07 60.08
0.150 1.86 3.65 56.42
0.063 2.08 4.09 52.34
Pan
Hydrometer Particle
Elapsed Time True Reading Effective Depth Modified Reading % Finer
Reading Diameter
1 11.00 11.50 170.63 11.50 0.053 36.29
2 10.50 11.00 172.51 11.00 0.038 34.71
4 10.50 11.00 172.51 11.00 0.027 34.71
8 10.00 10.50 174.39 10.50 0.019 33.13
30 10.00 10.50 174.39 10.50 0.010 33.13
60 9.50 10.00 176.27 10.00 0.007 31.55
120 8.50 9.00 180.03 9.00 0.005 28.40
240 8.00 8.50 181.91 8.50 0.004 26.82
480 8.00 8.50 181.91 8.50 0.003 26.82
1440 7.00 7.50 185.67 7.50 0.001 23.66
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Grain diameter,mm
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.063 0.2 0.6 2.0 20.0 60.0

CLAY
26 % 27 % 46 % 1%
COMPACTION TEST
AND
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO
TEST (CBR SOAKED)

GLSB/CV/R6971-771/13 27th November 2013
1 of 19
Subject : To carry out Compaction Test (6) nos. and CBR Soaked 1 mould method (6)
nos.on samples received.
Owner : MESSRS. PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS)
Level 73, Tower 2, Petronas Twin Towers,
Kuala Lumpur City Centre,
50088 Kuala Lumpur
Customer : MESSRS. TECHNIP GEOPRODUCTION (M) SDN BHD

2nd Floor, Wisma Technip,
241, Jalan Tun Razak,
50400 Kuala Lumpur
Consultant : MESSRS. GCU CONSULTANTS SDN BHD

Unit 3F-09, IOI Business Park,
Bandar Puchong Jaya,
47170 Puchong, Selangor Darul Ehsan
Method of Test : Tests Reference Methods

Compaction/Modified Proctor BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
CBR Soaked BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
Project Title : 2. ADDITIONAL SOIL INVESTIGATION FACTUAL REPORT FOR RAPID

PROJECT REFINERY PROCESS AREA
Sample Description : a) NTP12

b) NTP13
Condition of Receipt : 2 bags of sample weighing approximately 20kg/each were received on 5th October
2013.
Results : Refer page 2 to page 19.
(Mohd Sulaiman Omar) (Ir. Koo Kean Siang)

Assistant Engineer Professional Engineer
B.Tech M. Eng (Geotech)
MIEM. P. Eng. (Malaysia)
2 of 19
Results:
Table 1 : Determination of Dry Density/Moisture Content Relationship. ( BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990 )
Sample : Reddish brown with pale grey mottled, light purple and light yellow spotted, sandy SILT
Borehole No. : NTP-12 Depth (m) : 0.0-1.0
Method of Compaction: (1) 4.5kg rammer 27 blow, 5 layers
Modified Proctor (2) Single/separate sample
a Test No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
3
b Volume of mould (v) cm 1005 1005 1005 1005 1005
c Wt. of compacted soil + mould g 6803 6898 6984 7052 7021
d Wt. of mould g 5021 5021 5021 5021 5021
e Wt. of compacted soil c-d g 1782 1877 1963 2031 2000
f Wet density P = e Mg/m3 1.77 1.87 1.95 2.02 1.99
b
g Container no. S14 1K G17 11B 9B 14B 5B 15B 1B 7B
Moisture Content
h Wt. of wet soil + cont. g 123.1 123.3 123.2 123.6 123.4 123.5 123.7 123.8 123.8 123.6
i Wt. of dry soil + cont. g 116.0 116.2 114.0 114.3 111.8 112.0 109.8 109.9 107.4 107.4
j Wt. of container g 18.7 18.7 18.8 23.3 23.5 23.6 24.4 24.4 23.6 23.7
k Wt. of water (W w) h-i g 7.1 7.1 9.2 9.3 11.6 11.5 13.9 13.9 16.4 16.2
l Wt. of dry soil (W s) i-j g 97.3 97.5 95.2 91.0 88.3 88.4 85.4 85.5 83.8 83.7
m Moisture content m = k % 7.3 7.3 9.7 10.2 13.1 13.0 16.3 16.3 19.6 19.4
l 7.3 9.9 13.1 16.3 19.5
n Dry density Pd = 100P Mg/m3

1.65 1.70 1.73 1.74 1.67
100 + m
Maximum dry density 1.74 Mg/m3
Optimum moisture content. 15.0 %
Amount retained on 20 mm BS test sieve 0%
Dry density vs Moisture Content Assumed S.G = 2.58
1.80
1.70
AIR VOID 0%
AIR VOID 5%
1.60
AIR VOID 10%
1.50
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
21
Note: Opinions and interpretation expressed herein are outside the Scope of SAMM Accreditation
3 of 19
Table 2 : California Bearing Ratio Test- Soaked ( BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990 )

Soil Description : Reddish brown with pale grey mottled, light purple and light yellow spotted, sandy SILT
Borehole No : NTP 12 Depth(m) :0.0 - 1.0
Sample Preparation Method : 2.5kg rammer / 4.5kg rammer / vibrating hammer 62 blows 5 layers
Density Before Soaking Moisture Content Top Bottom

Mould no. NTP12 (0-1) Container no. A11 A12
Wt. of mould and wet soil g 9169 Wt. of cont. & wet soil g 128.6 129.1
Wt. of mould g 5086 Wt. of cont. & dry soil g 121.8 122.0
Wt. of soil g 4083 Wt. of container g 26.1 22.7
Mould Dia. 151.86 mm Mould Height 127.00 mm Wt. of water g 6.8 7.1
Volume of mould cm3 2299 Wt. of dry soil g 95.7 99.3
Wet density Mg/m3 1.776 Moisture content % 7.1 7.2
Dry density Mg/m3 1.66 Av. moisture content % 7.1
(Unsoaked/soaked C.B.R. test) Proving ring constant : 0.02166 kN/Div
Penetration Dial Gauge Force (kN) Corrected (kN) Penetration Dial Gauge Force (kN) Corrected (kN)
(mm) Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom (mm) Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom
0.25 2 6 0.04 0.13 4.00 30 63 0.65 1.36
0.50 3 13 0.06 0.28 4.25 31 65 0.67 1.41
0.75 5 20 0.11 0.43 4.50 33 67 0.71 1.45
1.00 7 26 0.15 0.56 4.75 34 69 0.74 1.49
1.25 9 31 0.19 0.67 5.00 36 71 0.78 1.54
1.50 11 35 0.24 0.76 5.25 37 73 0.80 1.58
1.75 13 39 0.28 0.84 5.50 38 74 0.82 1.60
2.00 15 42 0.32 0.91 5.75 39 75 0.84 1.62
2.25 17 45 0.37 0.97 6.00 40 76 0.87 1.65
2.50 18 49 0.39 1.06 6.25 41 76 0.89 1.65
2.75 20 52 0.43 1.13 6.50 42 76 0.91 1.65
3.00 22 55 0.48 1.19 6.75 43 76 0.93 1.65
3.25 24 57 0.52 1.23 7.00 43 76 0.93 1.65
3.50 26 59 0.56 1.28 7.25 43 76 0.93 1.65
3.75 28 61 0.61 1.32 7.50 43 76 0.93 1.65
Expansion & Absorption Determination Moisture Content Top Bottom
Surcharge kg 4.5 Container no. C1 C2
Gauge reading after soaking mm 8.65 Wt. of cont. & wet soil g 114.8 115.2
Gauge reading before soaking mm 5.00 Wt. of cont. & dry soil g 103.5 99.8
Total expansion mm 3.65 Wt. of container g 18.7 18.6
Wt. of mould & soil after soaking g 9422 Wt. of water g 11.3 15.4
Wt. of mould & soil before soaking g 9169 Wt. of dry soil g 84.8 84.4
Wt. of water absorption g 253 Moisture content % 13.3 18.2
TOP
Penetration,mm Load, kN Standard Load, kN CBR Value
2.5 0.4 13.2 3
5.0 0.8 20.0 4
BOTTOM
2.5 1.1 13.2 8
5.0 1.5 20.0 8
Accepted CBR Value : 8 %

4 of 19
Graph Force v/s Penetration
10
7
Force, kN
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TOP BOTTOM
Penetration, mm
5 of 19
Results:
a Test No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
3
d Wt. of mould g 5021 5021 5021 5021 5021
b
g Container no. C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10
Moisture Content
l 7.1 9.3 12.2 15.0 18.4

1.64 1.70 1.74 1.75 1.67
100 + m
1.80
1.70 AIR VOID 0%
AIR VOID 5%
1.60
AIR VOID 10%
1.50
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
21
6 of 19


0.25 1 4 0.02 0.09 4.00 29 64 0.63 1.39
0.50 3 9 0.06 0.19 4.25 31 66 0.67 1.43
0.75 5 15 0.11 0.32 4.50 32 68 0.69 1.47
1.00 7 20 0.15 0.43 4.75 34 70 0.74 1.52
1.25 9 25 0.19 0.54 5.00 35 72 0.76 1.56
1.50 10 30 0.22 0.65 5.25 37 73 0.80 1.58
1.75 12 36 0.26 0.78 5.50 38 73 0.82 1.58
2.00 14 40 0.30 0.87 5.75 39 73 0.84 1.58
2.25 16 44 0.35 0.95 6.00 40 73 0.87 1.58
2.50 18 48 0.39 1.04 6.25 41 73 0.89 1.58
2.75 20 51 0.43 1.10 6.50 42 73 0.91 1.58
3.00 22 54 0.48 1.17 6.75 43 73 0.93 1.58
3.25 24 57 0.52 1.23 7.00 44 73 0.95 1.58
3.50 25 60 0.54 1.30 7.25 45 73 0.97 1.58
3.75 27 62 0.58 1.34 7.50 45 73 0.97 1.58
TOP
2.5 0.4 13.2 3
5.0 0.8 20.0 4
BOTTOM
2.5 1.0 13.2 8
5.0 1.5 20.0 8

7 of 19
10
7
Force, kN
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TOP BOTTOM
Penetration, mm
8 of 19
Results:
a Test No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
3
d Wt. of mould g 4904 4904 4904 4904 4904
b
g Container no. E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 E10
Moisture Content
l 7.3 9.3 12.3 15.1 18.2

1.66 1.73 1.77 1.78 1.71
100 + m
1.90
1.80
AIR VOID 0%
1.70
AIR VOID 5%
1.60
AIR VOID 10%
1.50
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
21
9 of 19


0.25 1 6 0.02 0.13 4.00 30 67 0.65 1.45
0.50 2 14 0.04 0.30 4.25 31 68 0.67 1.47
0.75 4 21 0.09 0.45 4.50 33 69 0.71 1.49
1.00 6 28 0.13 0.61 4.75 35 69 0.76 1.49
1.25 8 37 0.17 0.80 5.00 37 69 0.80 1.49
1.50 10 45 0.22 0.97 5.25 38 69 0.82 1.49
1.75 12 49 0.26 1.06 5.50 39 69 0.84 1.49
2.00 14 52 0.30 1.13 5.75 40 69 0.87 1.49
2.25 16 55 0.35 1.19 6.00 41 69 0.89 1.49
2.50 18 58 0.39 1.26 6.25 41 69 0.89 1.49
2.75 20 60 0.43 1.30 6.50 41 69 0.89 1.49
3.00 22 62 0.48 1.34 6.75 41 69 0.89 1.49
3.25 24 64 0.52 1.39 7.00 41 69 0.89 1.49
3.50 26 65 0.56 1.41 7.25 41 69 0.89 1.49
3.75 28 66 0.61 1.43 7.50 41 69 0.89 1.49
TOP
2.5 0.4 13.2 3
5.0 0.8 20.0 4
BOTTOM
2.5 1.3 13.2 10
5.0 1.5 20.0 8

10 of 19
10
7
Force, kN
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TOP BOTTOM
Penetration, mm
11 of 19
Results:
Sample : Medium to dark brown with pale grey streaked, sandy SILT
a Test No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
3
d Wt. of mould g 5021 5021 5021 5021 5021
b
g Container no. A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10
Moisture Content
l 11.0 13.3 16.4 19.5 22.4

1.60 1.69 1.73 1.71 1.62
100 + m
1.80
1.70
AIR VOID 0%
1.60
AIR VOID 5%
AIR VOID 10%

1.50
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
21
12 of 19

Soil Description : Medium to dark brown with pale grey streaked, sandy SILT

0.25 1 4 0.02 0.09 4.00 19 42 0.41 0.91
0.50 2 8 0.04 0.17 4.25 20 43 0.43 0.93
0.75 3 12 0.06 0.26 4.50 22 43 0.48 0.93
1.00 4 16 0.09 0.35 4.75 23 44 0.50 0.95
1.25 5 20 0.11 0.43 5.00 25 45 0.54 0.97
1.50 7 23 0.15 0.50 5.25 26 45 0.56 0.97
1.75 8 25 0.17 0.54 5.50 27 45 0.58 0.97
2.00 9 28 0.19 0.61 5.75 29 45 0.63 0.97
2.25 10 30 0.22 0.65 6.00 30 45 0.65 0.97
2.50 11 32 0.24 0.69 6.25 31 45 0.67 0.97
2.75 13 34 0.28 0.74 6.50 32 45 0.69 0.97
3.00 14 36 0.30 0.78 6.75 33 45 0.71 0.97
3.25 15 38 0.32 0.82 7.00 34 45 0.74 0.97
3.50 16 40 0.35 0.87 7.25 35 45 0.76 0.97
3.75 18 41 0.39 0.89 7.50 36 45 0.78 0.97
TOP
2.5 0.2 13.2 2
5.0 0.5 20.0 3
BOTTOM
2.5 0.6 13.2 5
5.0 1.0 20.0 5

13 of 19
Soil Description : Medium to dark brown with pale grey streaked, sandy SILT
10
7
Force, kN
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TOP BOTTOM
Penetration, mm
14 of 19
Results:
Sample : Yellowish brown with reddish brown mottled, sandy SILT

a Test No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
3
d Wt. of mould g 4904 4904 4904 4904 4904
b
g Container no. C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10
Moisture Content
l 9.9 12.1 14.5 17.1 20.2

1.61 1.68 1.74 1.73 1.65
100 + m
1.80
AIR VOID 0%
1.70
AIR VOID 5%
1.60
AIR VOID 10%
1.50
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
21
15 of 19

Soil Description : Yellowish brown with reddish brown mottled, sandy SILT

0.25 1 3 0.02 0.06 4.00 21 39 0.45 0.84
0.50 2 6 0.04 0.13 4.25 23 40 0.50 0.87
0.75 4 9 0.09 0.19 4.50 24 41 0.52 0.89
1.00 6 11 0.13 0.24 4.75 25 42 0.54 0.91
1.25 7 15 0.15 0.32 5.00 27 43 0.58 0.93
1.50 8 17 0.17 0.37 5.25 28 44 0.61 0.95
1.75 10 19 0.22 0.41 5.50 29 44 0.63 0.95
2.00 11 22 0.24 0.48 5.75 30 45 0.65 0.97
2.25 12 25 0.26 0.54 6.00 31 46 0.67 1.00
2.50 13 27 0.28 0.58 6.25 32 47 0.69 1.02
2.75 15 29 0.32 0.63 6.50 33 47 0.71 1.02
3.00 17 31 0.37 0.67 6.75 34 47 0.74 1.02
3.25 18 33 0.39 0.71 7.00 35 47 0.76 1.02
3.50 19 35 0.41 0.76 7.25 36 47 0.78 1.02
3.75 20 37 0.43 0.80 7.50 37 47 0.80 1.02
TOP
2.5 0.3 13.2 2
5.0 0.6 20.0 3
BOTTOM
2.5 0.6 13.2 5
5.0 0.9 20.0 5

16 of 19
10
7
Force, kN
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TOP BOTTOM
Penetration, mm
17 of 19
Results:
Sample : Yellowish brown with reddish brown mottled, sandy SILT

a Test No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
3
d Wt. of mould g 4904 4904 4904 4904 4904
b
g Container no. S14 1K G17 5B 9B 15B 7B 11B 14B 1B
Moisture Content
l 9.6 12.2 15.2 17.9 20.8

1.61 1.68 1.73 1.72 1.64
100 + m
1.80
1.70 AIR VOID 0%
AIR VOID 5%
1.60
AIR VOID 10%
1.50
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
21
18 of 19


0.25 1 4 0.02 0.09 4.00 18 37 0.39 0.80
0.50 2 7 0.04 0.15 4.25 19 38 0.41 0.82
0.75 3 10 0.06 0.22 4.50 20 39 0.43 0.84
1.00 4 13 0.09 0.28 4.75 21 40 0.45 0.87
1.25 5 16 0.11 0.35 5.00 22 41 0.48 0.89
1.50 6 20 0.13 0.43 5.25 23 42 0.50 0.91
1.75 7 23 0.15 0.50 5.50 24 43 0.52 0.93
2.00 8 25 0.17 0.54 5.75 25 44 0.54 0.95
2.25 9 26 0.19 0.56 6.00 26 45 0.56 0.97
2.50 10 28 0.22 0.61 6.25 27 46 0.58 1.00
2.75 11 30 0.24 0.65 6.50 28 46 0.61 1.00
3.00 13 31 0.28 0.67 6.75 29 46 0.63 1.00
3.25 15 33 0.32 0.71 7.00 30 46 0.65 1.00
3.50 16 34 0.35 0.74 7.25 31 46 0.67 1.00
3.75 17 35 0.37 0.76 7.50 32 46 0.69 1.00
TOP
2.5 0.2 13.2 2
5.0 0.5 20.0 3
BOTTOM
2.5 0.6 13.2 5
5.0 0.9 20.0 5

19 of 19
10
7
Force, kN
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TOP BOTTOM
Penetration, mm
CHEMICAL TEST

GLSB/CH/SI/2566-122(Refinery Process)/13(3) 14 November 2013
1 of 4
Subject Matter : 1. Determination of Sulphate Content, Chloride Content, pH Value

and Organic Content on TWENTY FOUR soil samples submitted.
2. Determination of pH Value, Sulphate Content and Chloride
Content on THIRTY EIGHT water samples submitted.

50400 Kuala Lumpur.
Test Methods : Tests Reference Methods

pH Value BS 1377 : Part 3 : 1990 : 9
Chloride Content BS 1377 : Part 3 : 1990 : 7
Sulphate Content BS 1377 : Part 3 : 1990 : 5
Organic Content BS 1377 : Part 3 : 1990 : 3
Sulphate Content(water) BS : 1377 : Part 3 : 1990 : 5.4 and 5.5
BS 6068 : Section 2.37 : 1990
Chloride Content (water)
ISO 9297 : 1989(E)

Refinery Process Area.
Date Received : 27August 5 September 2013
Samples Description : Refer to Table 1 & 2: Samples Description and Results of Analysis
Conditions of Receipts : Thirty eight bottles of water samples approximately 1.5L and twenty four
samples of soil weighing approximately 500g were received.
Results : Refer to Table 1 & 2: Samples Description and Results of Analysis
Authorized Signatory:
Ahmad Zamani Ab. Halim

Chemist (A/2539/5222/2007)
2 of 4
Results:
Table 1: Samples Description and Results of Analysis for Soil
RESULTS
Sulphate Organic Chloride Passing
Sample pH Value
Content Content Content 2mm
- % % % %
1. PBH10-03/P1D2/1.00 4.0 0.07 0.1 <0.01 97
2. PBH10-05/P6D7/7.50 4.0 0.05 0.2 <0.01 98
3. PBH10-08/P3D4/3.00 4.0 0.04 1.4 <0.01 99
4. PBH10-9/P10D11/13.50 4.8 0.04 0.1 <0.01 98
5. PBH10-10/P11D12/15.00 5.6 0.05 0.1 <0.01 73
6. PBH10-12/P3D4/3.00 3.7 0.05 0.2 <0.01 98
7. PBH10-13/P7D7/9.50 6.1 0.04 <0.1 <0.01 92
8. PBH10-15/P3D4/3.00 2.9 0.49 20.9 <0.01 98
9. PBH10-16/P5D5/6.00 3.7 0.04 0.2 <0.01 97
10. PBH10-17/P9D9/12.00 4.2 0.03 0.1 <0.01 87
11. PBH10-20/P4D5/4.50 4.2 0.06 0.2 <0.01 94
12. PBH10-22/P9D10/12.00 4.3 0.03 0.1 <0.01 98
13. PBH10-23/P6D6/7.50 4.1 0.06 0.1 0.01 96
14. PBH10-30/P13D14/18.00 4.7 0.06 0.1 <0.01 95
15. PBH10-31/P11D12/15.00 4.7 0.04 <0.1 <0.01 97
16. PBH10-32/P5D6/6.00 5.1 0.05 <0.1 <0.01 22
17. PBH10-33/P13D14/18.00 4.7 0.05 <0.1 0.01 97
18. PBH10-35/P8D9/10.5 5.9 0.09 2.7 <0.01 100
19. PBH10-35/P14D15/19.5 5.4 0.04 <0.1 <0.01 99
20. PBH10-36/P12D12/16.50 6.4 0.05 <0.1 <0.01 96
21. PBH10-37/P14D14/19.50 4.5 0.04 0.1 0.01 43
22. PBH17-02/P13D14/18.00 5.7 0.07 0.1 <0.01 94
23. PBH17-04/P10D11/13.50 4.0 0.04 <0.1 <0.01 79
24. NTP13/0.50 4.6 0.08 0.4 <0.01 99
3 of 4
Table 2: Samples Description and Results of Analysis for Water
RESULTS
Sample pH Value Sulphate Content Chloride Content
- g/l mg/l
1. PBH10-01/GROUNDWATER 3.4 0.09 17
10. PBH10-10/GROUNDWATER 5.0 0.03 7.4
11. PBH10-11/GROUNDWATER 4.0 0.03 22
12. PBH10-12/GROUNDWATER 4.1 0.02 12
13. PBH10-13/GROUNDWATER 4.5 0.02 11
14. PBH10-14/GROUNDWATER 5.4 0.02 17
15. PBH10-15/GROUNDWATER 4.1 0.03 22
16. PBH10-16/GROUNDWATER 5.4 0.01 11
17. PBH10-17/GROUNDWATER 5.2 0.01 11
18. PBH10-18/GROUNDWATER 3.4 0.26 1900
19. PBH10-20/GROUNDWATER 5.4 0.01 11
20. PBH10-21/GROUNDWATER 5.6 0.02 18
21. PBH10-22/GROUNDWATER 4.8 0.10 6.8
22. PBH10-23/GROUNDWATER 4.4 0.02 11
23. PBH10-25/GROUNDWATER 3.9 0.02 12
4 of 4
RESULTS
Sample pH Value Sulphate Content Chloride Content
- g/l mg/l
24. PBH10-26/GROUNDWATER 4.3 0.01 19
25. PBH10-27/GROUNDWATER 3.6 0.03 14
26. PBH10-28/GROUNDWATER 4.7 0.03 8.1
27. PBH10-30/GROUNDWATER 5.6 0.03 16
28. PBH10-31/GROUNDWATER 4.3 0.03 9.9
29. PBH10-32/GROUNDWATER 4.5 0.02 8.1
30. PBH10-33/GROUNDWATER 4.5 0.01 10
31. PBH10-34/GROUNDWATER 3.9 0.02 14
32. PBH10-35/GROUNDWATER 4.3 0.02 12
33. PBH10-36/GROUNDWATER 6.4 0.02 7.4
34. PBH10-37/GROUNDWATER 6.3 0.01 23
35. PBH17-01/GROUNDWATER 6.1 0.03 12
36. PBH17-02/GROUNDWATER 4.7 0.02 8.1
37. PBH17-03/GROUNDWATER 6.1 0.02 11
38. PBH17-04/GROUNDWATER 3.6 0.05 5.0
Job No : L130366
SOILPRO TECHNICAL SERVICES SDN BHD (380315-T) Date : 19.09.2013
16 Jalan TIB-1/17, Taman Industri Bolton, 68100 Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia
CERTIFICATE OF CHEMICAL
Tel: 603-6188 6975, 03-6188 9964 Fax: 603-6185 5903
eMail: soilpro@tm.net.my Website: http://soilpro.com.my ANALYSIS
Project : PETRONAS RAPID PROJECT

Location : REFINERY PROCESS AREA
Customer : Geolab (M) Sdn Bhd
WATER SAMPLE SOIL SAMPLE
REFERENCE SAMPLE DEPTH pH SOLUBLE SOLUBLE ORGANIC TOTAL CHLORIDE pH
NO No (metre) VALUE SULPHATE CHLORIDE MATTER SULPHATE CONTENT VALUE
(SO3, g/L) (Cl, g/L) (OM, %) (SO3, %) (Cl, %)
PBH 10-01 UD1 3.5 - - - - 0.34 <0.01 <0.01 4.2

PBH 10-02 UD1 5.0 - - - - 0.18 <0.01 <0.01 4.6
PBH 10-04 UD1 5.0 - - - - 0.17 <0.01 <0.01 4.3
PBH 10-06 UD1 5.0 - - - - 0.35 <0.01 <0.01 4.4
PBH 10-07 UD1 3.5 - - - - 0.29 <0.01 <0.01 4.2
PBH 10-11 UD1 5.0 - - - - 0.61 <0.01 <0.01 4.6
PBH 10-14 UD1 5.0 - - - - 0.54 <0.01 <0.01 4.8
PBH 10-14 UD2 6.5 - - - - 0.30 <0.01 <0.01 4.7
PBH 10-18 UD1 3.5 - - - - 0.80 <0.01 <0.01 4.0
PBH 10-21 UD1 3.5 - - - - 1.25 <0.01 <0.01 4.2
PBH 10-25 UD1 3.5 - - - - 8.45 <0.01 <0.01 3.3
PBH 10-25 UD2 6.0 - - - - 2.53 <0.01 <0.01 3.5
PBH 10-26 UD1 6.5 - - - - 1.37 <0.01 <0.01 4.2
PBH 10-26 UD2 9.5 - - - - 1.88 <0.01 <0.01 4.9
PBH 10-27 UD1 3.5 - - - - 7.94 <0.01 <0.01 3.3
PBH 10-28 UD1 3.5 - - - - 2.23 <0.01 <0.01 4.4
PBH 10-34 UD1 3.5 - - - - 0.73 <0.01 <0.01 4.9
PBH 10-34 UD2 6.5 - - - - 2.29 <0.01 <0.01 4.2
Notes: The tests reported herein have been reported in accordance with BS1377 : 1990, Part 3
This document shall not be reproduced except in full.
WONG KIM YUEN

Technical Manager
APPROVED SIGNATORY
for SOILPRO TECHNICAL SERVICES SDN BHD 19.09.2013
(Company No.380315-T)
REPORT ON CHEMICAL TEST RESULTS ON 18 No.SOIL SAMPLES TESTED BY : Mary Page

pH VALUE, TOTAL SULPHATE, ORGANIC MATTER AND CHLORIDE CONTENT REPORTED BY WONG K.Y. 1 of 1
Job No : L130366
SOILPRO TECHNICAL SERVICES SDN BHD (380315-T) Date : 19.09.2013
16 Jalan TIB-1/17, Taman Industri Bolton, 68100 Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia
CERTIFICATE OF CHEMICAL
Tel: 603-6188 6975, 03-6188 9964 Fax: 603-6185 5903
eMail: soilpro@tm.net.my Website: http://soilpro.com.my ANALYSIS
Project : PETRONAS RAPID PROJECT

Location : REFINERY PROCESS AREA
Customer : Geolab (M) Sdn Bhd
WATER SAMPLE SOIL SAMPLE
REFERENCE SAMPLE DEPTH pH SOLUBLE SOLUBLE ORGANIC TOTAL CHLORIDE pH
NO No (metre) VALUE SULPHATE CHLORIDE MATTER SULPHATE CONTENT VALUE
(SO3, g/L) (Cl, g/L) (OM, %) (SO3, %) (Cl, %)
PBH 17-01 UD1 6.5 - - - - 0.50 <0.01 <0.01 4.5

PBH 17-01 UD3 12.5 - - - - 0.22 <0.01 <0.01 4.8
PBH 17-02 UD1 9.5 - - - - 0.34 <0.01 <0.01 5.5
PBH 17-03 UD1 3.5 - - - - 11.46 <0.01 <0.01 2.9
PBH 17-03 UD5 15.5 - - - - 2.25 <0.01 <0.01 3.9
PBH 17-04 UD1 3.5 - - - - 5.37 <0.01 <0.01 3.4
Notes: The tests reported herein have been reported in accordance with BS1377 : 1990, Part 3
This document shall not be reproduced except in full.
WONG KIM YUEN

Technical Manager
APPROVED SIGNATORY
for SOILPRO TECHNICAL SERVICES SDN BHD 19.09.2013
(Company No.380315-T)
REPORT ON CHEMICAL TEST RESULTS ON 6 No.SOIL SAMPLES TESTED BY : Mary Page

pH VALUE, TOTAL SULPHATE, ORGANIC MATTER AND CHLORIDE CONTENT REPORTED BY WONG K.Y. 1 of 1

Example-Site Investigation Factual Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Example-Site Investigation Factual Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

OWNER REFERENCE

Project Package Originator Discipline Doc. Type Unit n Serial n

1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 6

2.0 SCOPE OF WORKS .............................................................................. 6

3.0 FIELD EXPLORATION ........................................................................ 7

3.3 Field Testing ................................................................................ 10

4.0 LABORATORY TESTING .................................................................... 14

CONFIDENTIAL Not to disclose without authorization

c. Particle Size Distributions ....................................................... 15

5.0 COMMENTARY ..................................................................................... 19

CONFIDENTIAL Not to disclose without authorization

Appendix A - Site Plan

CONFIDENTIAL Not to disclose without authorization

2.0 SCOPE OF WORKS

The scope of works involved in this investigation includes the following: -

1. To explore the subsurface condition of proposed development area and to provide

6. To carry out Cone Penetration Test to determine the Engineering Parameters of

CONFIDENTIAL Not to disclose without authorization

3.0 FIELD EXPLORATION.

The exploration of works involved in this investigation includes :

a) Thirty Eight (38) numbers of Borehole

3.2 DEEP BORING

3.2.1 Deep Boring Equipment

3.2.2 Method of Advancing Boreholes

CONFIDENTIAL Not to disclose without authorization

3.2.3 Sampling in Boreholes

Disturbed samples were normally preserved immediately after being

ii. Undisturbed Sample

Undisturbed samples were taken with thin-wall tube sampler or stationary

iii. Rock Sample

CONFIDENTIAL Not to disclose without authorization

iv. Ground Water Sampling

Ground water sample taken in accordance with BS 5930: Section 23.3

Approximately 1.0 litre of water should be collected and stored in a clear

v. Water Table Measurement

1. Before work commences in the morning

CONFIDENTIAL Not to disclose without authorization

3.3 Field Testing

3.3.1 Standard Penetration Test

Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) was carried in accordance with BS 1377-

3.3.2 Field Vane Shear Test

Vane test shall be carried out in accordance to BS 1377: 1990 Determination

CONFIDENTIAL Not to disclose without authorization

3.4 Trial Pit

Shallow trial pits provide an economical method of examining in-situ conditions.

3.5 Cone Penetration Test

b. Graphical presentation of measured parameters at any scale required.

c. Resolution of the measured parameter is:-

CONFIDENTIAL Not to disclose without authorization

Cone resistance : 0.01 Mpa

3.6 Earth Resistivity Test

CONFIDENTIAL Not to disclose without authorization

Where aw : apparent resistivity ()

The field measurement data and result are presented in Appendix G.

3.6 Thermal Resistivity

3.7 Downhole PS Logging Survey

The purpose of this geophysical investigation is to obtain geophysical properties of the

The results of the Downhole PS Logging Survey as presented in Appendix I

CONFIDENTIAL Not to disclose without authorization

4.0 LABORATORY TESTING

The tests consisted of: -

1. Soil Classification Test

2. Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Test

4.1 Soil Classification Test