Prepare for 15 cases for reporting and recitation .

Difference between culpa contractual and culpa aquilana

As to burden of proof

As to employers defense for employees negligence

1.Cangco v manila railroad , 14 October 1918

2.Calalas v ca 31 may 2000

Can one be liable for quasi delict if there is pre existing contract.

3. Air france vs carascoso 28 september 1966

Concept of Negligence (what is the degree of diligence )

4. PNR v. CA 15 october 2007

5. PNR v. Brunty 2 Nov. 2006

What is gross negligence

6. Ilao oreta v. ronquillo 11 oct, 2007

Concept of good father of the family

7. Sicam v. Jorge 8 august 2007

Can children be quilty of negligence

8. Taylor v. manila electric railroad 22 march 1910

9. Jarco Marketing vs ca 21 dec. 1999

Pharmacist diligence

10. Us v.pineda 22 jan 1918

11. Mercury drug v. de leon 17 oct 2008

Medical professional diligence / standard of professional must be testified by expert witness

12. Cruz v. ca 18 nov. 1997

13. Cayao lasam v spouses ramonete 18 dec 2008

14. Lucas v dr tuano 17 april 2009

Presumption of negligence

Art. 2185

15. Tison v. spouses pomasin 24 august 2011

16. Sanitary steam v ca 10 dec. 1998

Res ipsa loquitur

Concept / element

17. Professional services v. Agana 31 jan 2007

18. Tan v jam transit 25 nov 2009

19. College assurance v belfranlt 22 nov 2007

20.Dm consunji v ca 20 april 2001

21. Ramos v ca 29 dec 1999

Defenses for negligence

a. Plaintiff negligence is the proximate cause

22. Pldt vs ca 29 dec 1989

b. Contributory negligence of the plaintiff

23. MH rakes v atlantic 23 jan 1907

c. fortuitous event

see article 1174

24. Juntilla v Fontanar may 1985

25. Southeastern College v CA 10 jluy 1998

d. Plaintiff assumption of risk

26.Nikko hotel v. Roberto reyes 28 feb 2005

27.Pantaleon v American Express 25 August 2010

PROXIMATE CAUSE

28.Batachan v Medina 22 October 1957

29 phoenix construction vs iac 10 march 1987 ( emphasis on intervening cause )

30. Dy Teban v Jose Ching 4 February 2008

Last clear chance

31.Picart vs Smith 15 march 1918

32.Lapanday v Angala 21June 2007

Person Vicariously Liable

Parent

33. Libi v IAC 18 September 1992

34. Tamargo v CA 3 june 1992

35.Teacher and Schools

36.Palisoc vs. Brillantes 4 Oct. 1971

37.Amadora Vds. CA 15 April 1988

38.Salvosa v IAC 5 October 1988

39.St. Joseph College v Miranda 29 June 2010

Employer employee relationship

40.Profesional Services v. Agana 31 Jan 2007

41. NPC v CA 4 August 1998

Defense of employer

42. Mercury Drug vs. Huang 22 June 2007 ( selection and supervision )

43. Lampesa v De vera 4 February 2008

The State

44. Meritt v Government 21 March 1916

45. Fontanilla vs Maliaman 1 December 1989

Possessor of Animal

46. Vestil v IAC 6 November 1989

Motor Vehicle Mishap

47. Caedo v. Yu khe Thai 18 December 1968

City and Municipality

48. Quezon City vs. Dacara 15 June 2005

49. Guilatco v Dagupan 21 March 1989

Damages s

Custodio v ca 9 February 1996 (there must be injury before damages can be awarded)

Actual damages

Omc carriers inc v ca 21 jan 1999

Pnoc vs ca 8 oct. 1998

Candano v sugata on 13 march 2007

Villa rey transit v ca 18 feb 1970

In contract and quasi contract

Sps zalamea v ca 18 nov 1993

Bpi fami;y bank v franco 23 nov 2007

Earning capacity /loss of earning capacity

Gatchalian v delim 21 oct 1991

Simex international v ca 19 march 1990

Phil. Hawk v lee 16 feb. 2010

Pleyto v lomboy 16 june 2004

In crime

Crisostomo v people 1 sept . 2010

People vs banago 29 june 1999.

Attorneys fees

Quirante v iac 31 jan1989

Manila electric company v ramoy 4 march 2008

Briones v macabagdal 3 august 2010

Bank of America vs. phil racing club 30 july 2009

Andrada v pilhino sales 23 feb. 2011

Interst

Eastern shipping v ca 12 july 1994

Pan pacific v equitable 18 march 2010

Frias vs san diego sison 3 april 2007

Moral damages

Keiruf v ca 13 march 1997

Bf metal v lomotan 16 april 2008

In Seduction rape

People v lizano 27 april 2007

Libel / slander

Occena v icamina 22 jan 1990

Juridical person

Abs cbn vs ca 21 jan 1999