Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Lampiran 6

ANALISA DESKRIPTIF KARAKTERISTIK RESPONDEN


FREKUENSI UMUR RESPONDEN

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative


Percent Percent
Valid < 35 TH 2 2.3 2.3 2.3
36 - 45 TH 13 15.1 15.1 17.4
46 - 55 TH 45 52.3 52.3 69.8
56 - 60 TH 26 30.2 30.2 100.0
Total 86 100.0 100.0

FREKUENSI JENIS KELAMIN

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative


Percent Percent
Valid LAKI - LAKI 46 53.5 53.5 53.5
PEREMPUAN 40 46.5 46.5 100.0
Total 86 100.0 100.0

FREKUENSI KEPATUHAN POLA MAKAN

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative


Percent
Valid PATUH 37 43.0 43.0 43.0
TIDAK PATUH 49 57.0 57.0 100.0
Total 86 100.0 100.0

FREKUENSI KEPATUHAN AKTIVITAS FISIK

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative


Percent Percent
Valid PATUH 42 48.8 48.8 48.8
TIDAK PATUH 44 51.2 51.2 100.0
Total 86 100.0 100.0

FREKUENSI KEPATUHAN PENGOBATAN

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative


Percent Percent
Valid PATUH 54 62.8 62.8 62.8
TIDAK PATUH 32 37.2 37.2 100.0
Total 86 100.0 100.0
Lampiran 6

TABULASI SILANG KEPATUHAN POLA MAKAN TERHADAP KEJADIAN


KOMPLIKASI DIABETES MELLITUS PADA DIABETISI

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
KOMPLIKASI * 86 100.0% 0 .0% 86 100.0%
KEPATUHAN POLA
MAKAN

KEPATUHAN POLA MAKAN * KOMPLIKASI Crosstabulation

KOMPLIKASI DM
TIDAK KOMPLIKASI Total
KOMPLIKASI
KEPATUHAN PATUH Count 25 12 37
POLA MAKAN
% within 67.6% 32.4% 100.0%
KEPATUHAN
POLA MAKAN
% within 58.1% 27.9% 43.0%
KOMPLIKASI
% of Total 29.1% 14.0% 43.0%
TIDAK Count 18 31 49
PATUH
% within 36.7% 63.3% 100.0%
KEPATUHAN
POLA MAKAN
% within 41.9% 72.1% 57.0%
KOMPLIKASI
% of Total 20.9% 36.0% 57.0%
Total Count 43 43 86
% within 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
KEPATUHAN
POLA MAKAN
% within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
KOMPLIKASI
% of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Lampiran 6

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.017 1 .005
Continuity Correction 6.831 1 .009
Likelihood Ratio 8.157 1 .004
Fisher's Exact Test .009 .004
Linear-by-Linear 7.923 1 .005
Association
N of Valid Cases 86
a Computed only for a 2x2 table
b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 18.50.

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. T Approx. Sig.


Error
Nominal by Nominal Contingency .292 .005
Coefficient
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .305 .102 2.939 .004
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman .305 .102 2.939 .004
Correlation
N of Valid Cases 86
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c Based on normal approximation.

Mantel-Haenszel Common Odds Ratio Estimate

Estimate 3.588
ln(Estimate) 1.278
Std. Error of ln(Estimate) .460
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .005
Asymp. 95% Confidence Common Odds Lower Bound 1.458
Interval Ratio
Upper Bound 8.830
ln(Common Lower Bound .377
Odds Ratio)
Upper Bound 2.178
The Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio estimate is asymptotically normally distributed under
the common odds ratio of 1.000 assumption. So is the natural log of the estimate.
Lampiran 6

TABULASI SILANG KEPATUHAN AKTIVITAS FISIK TERHADAP KEJADIAN


KOMPLIKASI DIABETES MELLITUS PADA DIABETISI

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
KEPATUHAN AKTIVITAS 86 100.0% 0 .0% 86 100.0%
FISIK * KOMPLIKASI

KEPATUHAN AKTIVITAS FISIK * KOMPLIKASI Crosstabulation

KOMPLIKASI DM
TIDAK KOMPLIKASI Total
KOMPLIKASI
KEPATUHAN PATUH Count 27 15 42
AKTIVITAS
FISIK
% within 64.3% 35.7% 100.0%
KEPATUHAN
AKTIVITAS FISIK
% within 62.8% 34.9% 48.8%
KOMPLIKASI
% of Total 31.4% 17.4% 48.8%
TIDAK PATUH Count 16 28 44
% within 36.4% 63.6% 100.0%
KEPATUHAN
AKTIVITAS FISIK
% within 37.2% 65.1% 51.2%
KOMPLIKASI
% of Total 18.6% 32.6% 51.2%
Total Count 43 43 86
% within 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
KEPATUHAN
AKTIVITAS FISIK
% within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
KOMPLIKASI
% of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Lampiran 6

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


(2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.701 1 .010
Continuity Correction 5.631 1 .018
Likelihood Ratio 6.791 1 .009
Fisher's Exact Test .017 .009
Linear-by-Linear 6.623 1 .010
Association
N of Valid Cases 86
a Computed only for a 2x2 table
b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.00.

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. T Approx. Sig.


Error
Nominal by Nominal Contingency .269 .010
Coefficient
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .279 .104 2.664 .009
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman .279 .104 2.664 .009
Correlation
N of Valid Cases 86
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c Based on normal approximation.

Mantel-Haenszel Common Odds Ratio Estimate

Estimate 3.150
ln(Estimate) 1.147
Std. Error of ln(Estimate) .449
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .011
Asymp. 95% Confidence Common Odds Lower Bound 1.306
Interval Ratio
Upper Bound 7.600
ln(Common Odds Lower Bound .267
Ratio)
Upper Bound 2.028
The Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio estimate is asymptotically normally distributed under
the common odds ratio of 1.000 assumption. So is the natural log of the estimate.
Lampiran 6

TABULASI SILANG KEPATUHAN PENGOBATAN INTENSIF TERHADAP


KEJADIAN KOMPLIKASI DIABETES MELLITUS PADA DIABETISI

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
KEPATUHAN 86 100.0% 0 .0% 86 100.0%
PENGOBATAN *
KOMPLIKASI

KEPATUHAN PENGOBATAN * KOMPLIKASI Crosstabulation

KOMPLIKASI DM
TIDAK KOMPLIKASI Total
KOMPLIKASI
KEPATUHAN PATUH Count 32 22 54
PENGOBATAN
% within 59.3% 40.7% 100.0%
KEPATUHAN
PENGOBATAN
% within 74.4% 51.2% 62.8%
KOMPLIKASI
% of Total 37.2% 25.6% 62.8%
TIDAK PATUHCount 11 21 32
% within 34.4% 65.6% 100.0%
KEPATUHAN
PENGOBATAN
% within 25.6% 48.8% 37.2%
KOMPLIKASI
% of Total 12.8% 24.4% 37.2%
Total Count 43 43 86
% within 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
KEPATUHAN
PENGOBATAN
% within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
KOMPLIKASI
% of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Lampiran 6

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi- 4.977 1 .026
Square
Continuity 4.031 1 .045
Correction
Likelihood Ratio 5.041 1 .025
Fisher's Exact .044 .022
Test
Linear-by-Linear 4.919 1 .027
Association
N of Valid Cases 86
a Computed only for a 2x2 table
b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.00.

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. T Approx. Sig.


Error
Nominal by Contingency .234 .026
Nominal Coefficient
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .241 .104 2.271 .026
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman .241 .104 2.271 .026
Correlation
N of Valid Cases 86
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c Based on normal approximation.

Mantel-Haenszel Common Odds Ratio Estimate

Estimate 2.777
ln(Estimate) 1.021
Std. Error of ln(Estimate) .464
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .028
Asymp. 95% Confidence Common Odds Lower Bound 1.119
Interval Ratio
Upper Bound 6.894
ln(Common Odds Lower Bound .112
Ratio)
Upper Bound 1.931
The Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio estimate is asymptotically normally distributed under
the common odds ratio of 1.000 assumption. So is the natural log of the estimate.
Lampiran 6

Variables in the Equation


B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95.0%
C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
Step 1 POLMAK 1.793 .577 9.639 1 .002 6.005 1.937 18.623
AK.FISIK 1.218 .501 5.902 1 .015 3.380 1.265 9.027
OBAT 1.504 .592 6.446 1 .011 4.498 1.409 14.362
Constant -6.720 1.697 15.674 1 .000 .001
a Variable(s) entered on step 1: POLMAK, AK.FISIK, OBAT.

You might also like