The Davao Saw Mill Company operated a lumber business on land owned by Aproriano Castillo. When Davao Light and Power Company won a case against Davao Saw Mill, the sheriff levied the machineries located on the property. This case determines whether the machineries are considered real or personal property, as this distinction would affect whether they could be used as security in a mortgage on the land. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled the machineries were personal property despite being mounted on foundations, as Davao Saw Mill had previously treated them as such by taking out chattel mortgages. Therefore, the machineries could not be included as security in a real property mortgage on the land.
The Davao Saw Mill Company operated a lumber business on land owned by Aproriano Castillo. When Davao Light and Power Company won a case against Davao Saw Mill, the sheriff levied the machineries located on the property. This case determines whether the machineries are considered real or personal property, as this distinction would affect whether they could be used as security in a mortgage on the land. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled the machineries were personal property despite being mounted on foundations, as Davao Saw Mill had previously treated them as such by taking out chattel mortgages. Therefore, the machineries could not be included as security in a real property mortgage on the land.
The Davao Saw Mill Company operated a lumber business on land owned by Aproriano Castillo. When Davao Light and Power Company won a case against Davao Saw Mill, the sheriff levied the machineries located on the property. This case determines whether the machineries are considered real or personal property, as this distinction would affect whether they could be used as security in a mortgage on the land. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled the machineries were personal property despite being mounted on foundations, as Davao Saw Mill had previously treated them as such by taking out chattel mortgages. Therefore, the machineries could not be included as security in a real property mortgage on the land.
September 1, 2016 Facts Davao Saw Mill is the holder of a lumber concession. The land on which the business was conducted belonged to another person(Castillo). Davao Light and Power Co. filed an action against Davao Saw Mill and won.
The machineries belonging to the business were levied upon
as personalty by the sheriff.
The machineries in this case were placed and mounted on
foundations of cement. Issue Whether or not the machineries in dispute fall under the scope of real property that can be used as security for mortgage Arguments Machineries are movable by nature. It will only become immovable when it is the owner who placed the machineries, receptacles, instruments or implements, unless the person is duly authorized by the owner. DSM placed the machineries in the business establishment.
DSM has, on a number of occasions treated the machinery as personal property
by executing chattel mortgages in favor of third persons.
It can be inferred from its conduct that DSM characterizes the
machineries as chattels, which in turn, make them fall under the scope of personalty or movable property.
The Contract of Mortgage necessitates the use only of Immovable Property as
security, thus the machineries in dispute do not fall under this category.