Cultural rights, sometimes may be ...

and face you with the necesity of

percepted as completely separated of eating human flesh or cockroaches?
human rights. But is it so? Would you accept that?
What if somebody cut your acces to Would it be the violation of the human
the usual, culturaly acceptable food, or the civil rights?

Mrkonji Darko, Association for Heritage Interpretation in Tourism EC & Sinia Marii, Faculty of Civil Engeenering Osijek

KOPAKI RIT - SOCIO-KULTURNI ASPEKTI ZATITE

(SOCIOCULTURAL ASPECTS of PROTECTION)
Cilj je rada razmotriti pojedine mjere postojeeg modela ribolovnog gospodarenja podrujem, osobito zabrane "tradicijskog
ribolova" i drugih povezanih aktivnosti, te ispitati njihove uinke na okoli i lokalno stanovnitvo.
(The aim of the paper is to reconsider the certain measures of the existing model of fishing management of the area, in particular, the ban on
"traditional fishing" and other related activities, and to examine the impacts on the environment and the local population..)

Nature Park S W O T analysis (?)

STRENGHT ? WEAKNESS ?
Are the invasive species really a strength of the NATURE PARK? Is the traditional way of life really a weakness of the AREA?
Invasive Prussian Carp. Cleaning the fish on the shore before drying. Kopaevo (1950-es).

U ocjeni znaaja za poribljavanje injenicu da se radi o jednom od

ireg podruja dunavskog sliva,
kljuna su pitanja o vrstama i dobi
ribe, te kakav bi utjecaj imao
kontrolirani izlov. Imajui u vidu
invazivne vrste, npr. babuku,
tolstolobika i amura, koji su gotovo
istisnuli autohtonoga arana, upitni
su svrha i uinak reenog "poribljavanja" iz zatienog podruja.
In assessing the significance for the fish restocking of the wider area of Danube basin,
the key questions are, about the species and age of fish, and what would be the impact
of controlled fishing. Bearing in mind invasive species, such as Prussian carp, Silver
carp and Grass carp, which has almost completely displaced the indigenous Carp, the
purpose and effect of the certain "restocking" from the protected area are questionable.
rijetkih sauvanih poplavnih podruja,
nuno je sagledati i s kulturolokog
aspekta, pitanjem je li lokalnoj zajednici
kompenziran prijeboj tereta zatite
preko njezine kulture i gospodarskog
interesa, to je u liniji s EU normama i
Ramsarskom konvencijom, koja
upuuje na kulturno odrivi razvitak.
Finally, the fact that the area it is one of the rear protected floodplains, is necessary to be
observed from the cultural aspect. E.g. whether the local community is compensated for the
burden of protection on the account of its culture and economic interest, which is in line with
EU standards and the Ramsar Convention, which refers to culturally sustainable
development.

OPPORTUNITY ? THREAT ?
Are the allochthonous species really an opportunity for the PARK? Are the traditional fishermen really a threat for the PARK?
Allochthonous Great cormorants. Sakada company. Location: Kopaki Rit, ilinges (1950-es).

Tu je i pitanje velikog vranca, Gospodarski je ribolov u podruju

koji je danas prisutan u
nesrazmjerno veem broju nego
1967. godine kad je zatita
trebala ouvati zateeno stanje,
pri emu u obzir treba uzeti
injenicu da se radi o usko
ogranienom, te djelomino
kultiviranom podruju.
There is also the question of a Great cormorant, who is today present in
disproportionately bigger number than in 1967, when proclaimed protection was
supposed to preserve the contemporary state, taking into account the fact that it is a
narrowly restricted and partially cultivated area.
Kopakog rita dokumentiran tijekom
800 godina do sredine 1980-ih
godina, kada je razliitim mjerama
prekinut. S obzirom na svoju
dinstinktivnost, te povijesni
gospodarski znaaj za zajednicu, koja
se i s ribolovom, i s podrujem, i
danas vrlo snano identificira, nesporno se radi o iznimno vrijednoj
kulturnoj batini ije je odranje ugroeno.
Fishing in the area of Kopaki rit has been documented for 800 years, until the middle
1980s, when it was discontinued by different measures. Due to its distinctiveness, and
historical and economic significance for the community, that is still strongly identifying with
both, fishing and with the area, it is undoubtedly a particularly valuable cultural heritage
whose sustainability is endangered.

S obzirom na uoene probleme, koje postojeim pristupom nije mogue rijeiti, zakljuujemo da je nuno kontinuirano, multidisciplinarno
preispitivati model upravljanja zatienim podrujem, kako bi se sagledao cjelovit spektar uinaka, te uvele odgovarajue izmjene. Radi toga je u
raspravu potrebno ukljuiti sve zainteresirane i relevantne dionike: institucije iz podruja prirodnih i drutvenih znanosti, te oblasti kulture, javne
ustanove, lokalnu samoupravu, ali prije svega, lokalno stanovnitvo.
(Given the identified problems that the existing approach can not resolve, it is concluded that a continuous, multidisciplinary review of the area protection
management model is necessary in order to perceive the overall spectrum of impacts. For this reason, all interested and relevant stakeholders should be included
in the debate: institutions in the field of natural and social sciences and the field of culture, public institutions, local self-government, but above all, local
population.)