TITLE OF WHY I CHANGED MY MIND WATER FLUORIDATION The Mystery of Declining Water fluoridation, Systematic

ARTICLES ABOUT FLUORIDATION Tooth Decay tooth decay in 5 year review of

olds, and social water
deprivation measured fluoridation
by the Jarman score:
analysis of data from
British dental surveys
AUTHORS: Colquhoun (1997) Wilson (2007) Diesendorf (1986) Jones (1997) MS
As In-text McDonagh -
citation 2000

As References Colquhoun J. (1997). Why I Wilson L. (2007). Water Diesendorf (1986). The Water fluoridation, McDonagh.
changed my mind bout water Fluoridation, Wilson mystery of declining tooth tooth decay in 5 year M.S.,
fluoridation, Perspectives in Consultant decay, Nature,322,125-129. olds, and social Whiting
Biologyand Medicine 41 29- deprivation measured P.F., Wilson,
44. by the Jarman score: P.M.,
analysis of data from Sutton, A.J.,
British dental surveys, Chestnutt, I.,
Wigan, Standish Gate: Cooper, J.,
Wigan and Bolton Misso, K.,
Health Authority Bradley, M.,
Treasure, E.,
Kleijnen,
J(2000).Syst
ematic
review of
water
fluoridation.
University
of New
York New
York: NHS
 Centre for
Reviews and
Dissemination
What is the 1)To investigate the actual 1)To investigate the cause To reassess the studies on To examine the effect To review the
objective of the purpose of declining rate of of dental problems declining rate of fluoridation of water fluoridation, safety and
study? tooth decay rate. 2) to investigate the bad both artificial and efficacy of
effects of fluoridation natural, on dental fluoridation
decay, after of drinking
socioeconomic water.
deprivation was
controlled for.
Is there a YES YES -Reduction of tooth decay YES
hypothesis? -Decreasing number of -Fluoridation does not cannot be attributed to -no clear
If so, what is tooth decay rate is not benefit dental health water fluoridation evidence on
the hypothesis? caused by the water -Fluoridation of water led to negative
fluoridation. diseases effects of
fluoridation
What is the -comparing the timeline of -animal testing by studying -re-examination and NHS dental surveys in -data
methodology? tooth decay rate and the effect of fluorine on comparison of study reports 5 year olds in 19912 extraction
improvement of nutrition rats and 19934 and
intake in household assesmentof
-comparing the tooth decay study quality
rate in fluoridated and non-
fluoridated area

What is the -tooth decay rate in un- - increased the -water fluoridation is not the The more deprived an Water
result of the fluoridated area is lower. absorption of aluminum factor of tooth decay rate area the greater water fluoridation
study? -other dental problems reduction fluoridation benefit was
into the rats brains associated
occur in fluoridated area
which gives similar with an
effects to alzheimer increased
proportion of
children
without
 caries and a
reduction in
the number
of teeth
affected by
caries
Did it support YES. The result support yes
the hypothesis? the hypothesis.
What does the Author is against water Water fluoridation does not Water fluoridation is safe but Water fluoridation is No clear
author fluoridation, water benefit our dental health but it is not the factor on tooth urgently needed to evidence on
conclude based fluoridation is not the factor it may cause serious ilness decay decrease induce dental health potential
on the result of of declining rate of dental on poor negative
the study? problems effects of
fluoridation
This helps you YES YES YES YES YES
to write your
title and thesis
statement, i.e.
your
introduction.

CONCEPT MATRIX: To what extent time management effect the university student?

NOR SHUADA HATIKA BT ABU KASSIM 19373 PE