Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bolinao Electronic Vs Valencia
Bolinao Electronic Vs Valencia
FACTS:
ISSUE:
Whether or not Valencia is entitled to claim for damages.
The SC ruled in the negative. Valencia failed to show that any right of his has been
violated by the refusal of CBN to cease operation. Further, the SC noted that as the
records show, the appropriation to operate the Philippine Broadcasting Service as
approved by Congress and incorporated in the 1962-1963 Budget of the Republic of the
Philippines does not allow appropriations for TV stations particularly in Luzon. Hence,
since there was no appropriation allotted then there can be no damage; and if there are
expenditures made by Valencias department they are in fact in violation of the law and
they cannot claim damages therefrom. And even if it is shown that the then president
vetoed this provision of the Budget Act, such veto is illegal because he may not legally
veto a condition attached to an appropriation or item in the appropriation bill.