Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Order 95501 Casual Sex Revised
Order 95501 Casual Sex Revised
Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
A REVIEW OF CASUAL SEX ENCOUNTERS 2
Introduction
The twenty-first century is an unmatched period in the record of the sexuality of humans.
In the US, the age when individuals first get married and have children has risen considerably,
whereas the age when teenagers reach puberty has reduced. This situation has resulted in an age
where youngsters are physiologically capable of getting children but not socially or
psychologically prepared to take up family responsibilities (Bogle, 2007; Garcia & Reiber,
2008).
Scientific studies suggest that these developmental changes are some of the dynamics
behind the rise in casual sex encounters, uncommitted sexual experiences, or hookups, a
component of a trendy cultural change that has permeated the existences of budding grownups
Casual sex is getting more ingrained in accepted civilization, mirroring both transforming
sexual and social scripts, and evolved sexual preferences. Casual sex encounters may comprise a
broad range of sexual conducts like penetrative intercourse, oral sex, and kissing. Nonetheless,
these experiences mostly take place with no desire for or promise of a more conventional
romantic association.
This paper reviews the literature regarding casual sex encounters and reflects on research
that draws on hypothetical tensions and evidence between socio-cultural conjecture and
evolutionary conjectural models. It implies that these experiences are getting more and more
A REVIEW OF CASUAL SEX ENCOUNTERS 3
normative among teenagers and youngsters in North America and can best be comprehended
The current casual sex culture symbolizes a marked change in acceptance and openness
of uncommitted sex.
A Cultural Uprising
Casual sex, described in this paper as short uncommitted sexual experiences between
people who are not dating one another or romantic partners, have surfaced from more broad
social changes occurring in the last century. Casual sex encounters started to get more common
in the 1920s, with the expansion of motor vehicles and novel leisure like film theaters. Instead of
wooing at home under a guardians vigilant eye, youngsters left home and got the capability to
In the 1960s, youngsters got even more sexually freed, with the growth of feminism, the
rise of sex-integrated school party occasions, and broad accessibility of birth control. Currently,
sexual conduct outside of conventional committed, passionate pair-bonds has got more and more
Many of todays youngsters detail some casual sex encounter. The most current data
imply that around sixty to eighty percent of tertiary institution learners in the US have had
various types of unfussy sexual encounter. This is in order with the perception of up-and-coming
maturity (common age of college) as a time of growth changeover (Arnett, 2000), internalizing
and exploring sexuality and affectionate relationship, now comprising casual sex (Stinson, 2010).
A REVIEW OF CASUAL SEX ENCOUNTERS 4
Even if a large amount of the contemporary exploration has been undertaken on higher
learning institution grounds, among youngsters, seventy percent of sexually active twelve to
twenty-one-year-olds detailed having participated in informal sex in the previous twelve months
(Grello et al., 2003). Correspondingly, in a test group of students in either the seventh, ninth or
eleventh grade, thirty-two percent of partakers had encountered sexual interaction and sixty-one
association; this symbolizes around a fifth of the whole test population (Manning et al., 2006).
Approximately, both women and men appear to have elevated constructive affect than
unconstructive affect after casual sex. In one research, among partakers who were requested to
describe the morning after a casual sex encounter, 82% of males and 57% of females were by
and large happy they had had it (Garcia & Reiber, 2008). The percentage difference between
males and females is remarkable and illustrates standard sex dissimilarity in emotional
responses.
Likewise, both sexes also encounter some unconstructive affect also. In a subjective
research that requested a hundred and eighty seven partakers to detail their thoughts following a
distinctive casual sex encounter, 35% detailed feeling disappointed or regretful, 27% happy or
good, 20% contented, 11% perplexed, 9% pompous, 7% nervous or excited, 5% uneasy, and 2%
wanted or desirable (Paul & Hayes, 2002).Nevertheless, the research also established that
emotions varied through casual sex weighed against after casual sex: in a common casual sex
encounter, sixty-five percent of partakers detailed feeling excited, aroused, or good, seventeen
percent wanted or desirable, seventeen percent nothing in particular or were on the casual sex
A REVIEW OF CASUAL SEX ENCOUNTERS 5
encounter, eight percent regretful or embarrassed, seven percent scared or nervous, six percent
In spite of the commonness of affirmative feelings, casual sex encounters can comprise
negative consequences like unintended pregnancy, diseases that are transmitted sexually, sexual
cruelty, and psychological and emotional injury. In spite of those threats a subjective research of
seventy-one university learners (thirty-nine females and thirty-two males) established that almost
half of the partakers were not worried regarding getting infections that are transmitted through
sex from penetration during a casual sexual encounter, and most were not concerned regarding
getting infections from cunnilingus or fellatio in casual sexual encounters (Downing-Matibag &
Geisinger, 2009).
Complicating the threat of infections, individuals who engage in casual sexual encounters are
more likely to have multiple sexual partners. Furthermore, in a study population of one thousand
four hundred and sixty-eight university learners, in the four hundred and twenty-nine learners
who had engrossed in vaginal intercourse, anal sex, or oral sex in their most recent casual sexual
A personal history of casual sex conduct has been linked to various psychological
wellness dynamics. In a research of three hundred and ninety-four youngsters followed over a
college three-month term, those who had higher depressive warning signs and higher feelings of
lonesomeness who participated in interactional casual sex afterward detailed a decrease in both
feelings of aloneness and depressive indications (Owen et al., 2011). Simultaneously, partakers
A REVIEW OF CASUAL SEX ENCOUNTERS 6
who detailed lesser depressive indicators and lesser loneliness feelings who took part in casual
sexual intercourse consequently documented a rise in the mutual feelings of isolation and
depressive indicators (Owen et al., 2011). In another research, among two hundred and ninety-
one sexually knowledgeable persons, folks who had the greatest regret following casual sexual
intercourse also had higher indicators of despair than the ones who had no lamentations (Welsh
et al., 2006). Nevertheless, in the same test population, females and not males extent of
depressive indications rose with the quantity of past sex patterns in the previous twelve months
In the earliest investigation to examine the subject of sense of worth and casual sex, both
women and men who had ever participated in casual sex had lesser general confidence score
weighed against those with no unattached sexual encounters (Paul et al., 2000). The probable
underlying course of the link between sense of worth and casual sex is not yet clear (Fielder &
Just as numerous stimuli can be in quarrel, an individuals affective response during and
after casual sex can be in disagreement. Inconsistencies between desires and conducts,
mental and physical wellness. In spite of the allure of participating in casual sex, scientific
studies indicate that individuals take part in these conducts even when they are not comfortable
about them (Lambert et al., 2003; Reiber & Garcia, 2010). Additionally, folks overrate the
comfort of other regarding uncommitted sex and allot variable connotations to those conducts
(Lambert et al., 2003; Reiber & Garcia, 2010). Misjudgment of sexual customs is one probable
motivator for individuals to conduct themselves in a way they do not individually approve. In a
duplication and expansion of Lambert et al.'s (2003) research Reiber and Garcia (2010)
A REVIEW OF CASUAL SEX ENCOUNTERS 7
established that seventy-eight percent of persons overrated the comfort of others concerning
many dissimilar casual sex conducts, with males predominantly overrating the actual comfort of
Casual sex situations may comprise feelings of pressure and performance nervousness,
adding in to feelings of distress. According to a study on casual sex by Paul et al. (2000), sixteen
percent of partakers felt strained during their characteristic hookup. In the sample, twelve percent
of partakers felt out of power when penetration was not engrossed, while twenty-two percent felt
out of power when sexual penetration occurred. (It should be noted that this research questioned
partakers concerning normal hookups, and even if this is useful for overall models, it does not
capture definite dynamics swaying particular individual situations. For example, it is not clear
how one might rate a characteristic casual sex encounter if one occasion engrossed sexual
compulsion and lamentation while the other, after or before, was consenting and more
pleasurable).
Casual sex can lead to negative feelings and guilt. In an investigation of one hundred and
sixty-nine sexually experienced women and men assessed in bars meant for singles, when
handed the proclamation I feel culpable or would feel culpable regarding engaging in sexual
penetration with a person I had just known, seventy-two of females and thirty-two percent
males concurred (Herold & Mewhinney, 1993). The proportion of females conveying culpability
was further than double that of males. This finding is in line with an archetypal research
undertaken by Clark and Hatfield (1989) that established that males are a lot more probable than
females to allow informal sex propositions from persons they find eye-catching. Conley (2011)
imitated and expanded this establishment, illustrating that, under particular circumstances of
supposed soothe, the sexual category dissimilarities in approval of uncommitted sex are reduced.
A REVIEW OF CASUAL SEX ENCOUNTERS 8
responses than males (Paul & Hayes, 2002). The finding is also in line with previous work
illustrating sex dissimilarity, with females, by and large, identifying more emotional engagement
1995).Furthermore, in a research of one hundred and forty ( one hundred and nine female and
thirty-one male), foremost semester undergraduates, females and not males, who had participated
in casual sex indicated greater rates of psychological anguish (Fielder & Carey, 2010). Probably
hundred and seven undergraduate learners, more females than males hoped that connection
would grow following a casual sex encounter. Merely 4.4% of males and 8.2% of females
percent of males and 42.9 percent of females (36.57% of partakers) idyllically sought such an
eventuality (Garcia & Reiber, 2008). Therefore, it is likely that lamentation and unconstructive
outcomes from casual sex encounters result from people endeavoring to bargain numerous
constrained to openly take part in casual sex while yearning both instant sexual satisfaction and
Conclusion
Casual sex, now being studied across various disciplines and theoretical perspectives is
and pleasure intentions may control these sexual models, as witnessed in partakers responses
after hookups. Moreover, the discoveries that a majority of both males and females are motivated
to take part in casual sex, but mostly yearn a more passionate association, are in line with a toned
perspective that takes into detail new models of development, transforming social scripts, and
By description, casual sex encounters offer the attraction of sex with no emotional
attachments. In spite of their growing social tolerability, nonetheless, budding studies imply that
casual sexual encounters may leave more emotional attachments than most partakers might
initially assume. Additionally, in spite of the ordinariness of confirmatory feelings, casual sexual
experiences can have harmful consequences like inadvertent pregnancy, infections that are
transmitted via sex, sexual brutality, and mental and emotional harm.
References
A REVIEW OF CASUAL SEX ENCOUNTERS 10
Arnett, J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the
066x.55.5.469
Bogle, K. (2007). The shift from dating to hooking up in college: What scholars have missed.
Bogle, K. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York, NY: New
Clark, R. (1989). Gender Differences in Receptivity to Sexual Offers. Journal Of Psychology &
Downing-Matibag, T., & Geisinger, B. (2009). Hooking Up and Sexual Risk Taking Among
Fielder, R., & Carey, M. (2009). Predictors and Consequences of Sexual Hookups Among
1105-1119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4
Garcia, J., & Reiber, C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. The Journal
Grello, C., Welsh, D., & Harper, M. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552324
Grello, C., Welsh, D., Harper, M., & Dickson, J. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship
Herold, E., & Mewhinney, D. (1993). Gender differences in casual sex and AIDS prevention: A
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499309551676
Kunkel, D., Eyal, K., Finnerty, K., Biely, E., & Donnerstein, E. (2005). Sex on TV 4. Menlo
Lambert, T., Kahn, A., & Apple, K. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and Hooking up. Journal Of
Lewis, M., Granato, H., Blayney, J., Lostutter, T., & Kilmer, J. (2011). Predictors of Hooking Up
Manning, W., Giordano, P., & Longmore, M. (2006). Hooking Up. Journal Of Adolescent
Owen, J., & Fincham, F. (2010). Young Adults Emotional Reactions After Hooking Up
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x
A REVIEW OF CASUAL SEX ENCOUNTERS 12
Owen, J., Fincham, F., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-Term Prospective Study of Hooking Up
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x
Paul, E., & Hayes, K. (2002). The Casualties of `Casual' Sex: A Qualitative Exploration of the
Paul, E., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). Hookups: Characteristics and correlates of
Reiber, C., & Garcia, J. (2010). Hooking up: Gender differences, evolution, and pluralistic
98-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87568220903558596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01541580